What's new

Time is right for cricket to enter Olympics, says ICC chief executive

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,979
LONDON: The time is right for cricket to bid to become an Olympic sport with the 2024 Games being eyed as a strong possibility, International Cricket Council (ICC) chief executive David Richardson said on Thursday.

The 57-year-old South African — who was the national side’s wicketkeeper for seven years when they were welcomed back into the international arena in the 1990’s — said that added exposure in the Olympics would help to globalise the game. “I think a majority of the (ICC) members and certainly myself think the time is right,” Richardson told a small group of journalists after speaking at the SportsPro Live conference in London.

“I think we have come to the conclusion the overall benefit to globalise it and grow the game will outweigh any negatives. “We need to make a decision I would guess by July this year because I believe the IOC will in September be considering new sports for 2024.” Appropriately one of the two remaining candidates to host the 2024 global sporting extravaganza is Paris where cricket was last played at a Games in 1900 — Great Britain beating the only other entrant France by 158 runs.

“Neither Los Angeles and Paris would be disasters and and each might hold opportunities for us, especially the United States option,” said Richardson. “In Europe, too, it would be good although we would have to spend a bit more on cricket pitches in France than the US but it’s not impossible.” Richardson, who has been in his post since June 2012, admitted the scheduling, especially if held in Paris, would be the biggest challenge.

“From an ICC perspective the most challenging part is the scheduling as the Olympic Games is normally held in the Northern Hemisphere summer,” said Richardson. “It could be a problem for England, who for instance wouldn’t want to send their best players during an Ashes series and they have raised that concern in the past.”

That could be problematic as one of the IOC’s stipulations to sports wishing to gain entry is that the best players turn up — golf’s return to the Games last year was marred with several of the top stars withdrawing. Richardson, though, says the ICC can ensure the best do turn up. “To some extent you can control that,” he said. “In the participation agreements there is a clause that all the best available players must be selected.” Richardson, a qualified lawyer, said the IOC had not said whether a sport from the present roster would have to be removed if cricket was to be admitted.

“When taking any decison to admit any new sport the IOC has to take into account a limitation on the number of athletes,” he said. “Cricket, being a team sport, could not cater for more than six to eight teams and we must not send a beach cricket team or a six a side team. It must be in a format played at international level.” Richardson, who said there would be regional qualifying and finals and then an Olympic qualifier, said Twenty20 would be the perfect fit.

“Twenty20 is the ideal format and would be even better than (rugby) sevens, we would say, as it is one of the mainstream formats of cricket,” he said. Richardson doesn’t believe the fact neither the West Indies nor England could send a team would be a problem. “The countries who make up the West Indies haven’t raised it as an issue and similarly England, well they could include a Scotsman and an Irishman. “I don’t think that it will be an issue.

“As there are only going to be six or eight teams it is unlikely teams like Barbados and Jamaica would qualify.”

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/201...t-to-enter-olympics-says-icc-chief-executive/
 
There isnt need for cricket to be in olympics.

We already have got world t20, world cup, champions trophy and the icc test championship. Having another cricket tourny makes no sense. Also dont forget the premier t20 leagues around the world


I would prefer a hong kong soxes style torny for olympics. Good enjoyment and for spreading the game accross globally, while at the same time has no real meaning
 
There isnt need for cricket to be in olympics.

We already have got world t20, world cup, champions trophy and the icc test championship. Having another cricket tourny makes no sense. Also dont forget the premier t20 leagues around the world


I would prefer a hong kong soxes style torny for olympics. Good enjoyment and for spreading the game accross globally, while at the same time has no real meaning

The reason is not so we can have another prestigious tournament, it's so that other countries can pick up the sport as well. Countries that don' play cricket much get funded so little. I read somewhere that if cricket was to become an Olympic sport, China's annual funding would go much, much higher.
 
I'd take cricket in Olympics over the plethora of domestic leagues any day of the week. Atleast this way we are increasing the outreach of the sport and countries like China, US, Germany etc try to compete in every sport possible. This may mean 10-15 years down the line these nations will have good minnow level sides.
 
If cricket gets inducted in the Olympics, I full expect Shadab to be the flag bearer for team Pakistan as the captain of the Pakistani cricket side and the nation's marquee player.

:pkflag
 
Such a noble idea. Olympics is approx two weeks long so how many test matches will he get in. Or are they talking the "not so proper" cricket.
People need to realize there is no way cricket will ever get to be a popular sport besides India, Pakistan and BD. Productive contries cannot afford this crap.
 
Such a noble idea. Olympics is approx two weeks long so how many test matches will he get in. Or are they talking the "not so proper" cricket.
People need to realize there is no way cricket will ever get to be a popular sport besides India, Pakistan and BD. Productive contries cannot afford this crap.

T20 cricket can easily be popular in countries where cricket isn't played at the moment. A T20 match lasts about 3 hours. A football match lasts about 2 hours (2 halfs + halftime). The whole world is crazy about the sport, I don't think one extra hour for T20 will put off all these "productive" countries.
 
T20 cricket can easily be popular in countries where cricket isn't played at the moment. A T20 match lasts about 3 hours. A football match lasts about 2 hours (2 halfs + halftime). The whole world is crazy about the sport, I don't think one extra hour for T20 will put off all these "productive" countries.

Let us say North America. Cricket would be fortunate if it even gets in the top 10 sports. Nobody will play it, nobody (except immigrants).
 
Let us say North America. Cricket would be fortunate if it even gets in the top 10 sports. Nobody will play it, nobody (except immigrants).

Sir if they can play a sport like curling I think they can play any sport
 
For those who don't know, curling is a sport where one guy pushes a rock down a straight length of ice and two other guys mop the rock's path so that is goes faster or slower and comes to stop at a circle
 
For those who don't know, curling is a sport where one guy pushes a rock down a straight length of ice and two other guys mop the rock's path so that is goes faster or slower and comes to stop at a circle

Curling is entertainment. I am talking proper game where there is a viable revenue model.

Assuming you are from Canada, most of you rather watch Canucks, Blue Jays or CFL. Cricket will never be more than curiosity.
 
Curling is entertainment. I am talking proper game where there is a viable revenue model.

Assuming you are from Canada, most of you rather watch Canucks, Blue Jays or CFL. Cricket will never be more than curiosity.

It doesn't need to be better than Hockey or baseball, and at least in my lifetime, it won't be. But just because it'll never be as popular doesn't mean we can't expand the game here too.

Plus, North America is not the only place where the game can expand.
 
Curling is entertainment. I am talking proper game where there is a viable revenue model.

Assuming you are from Canada, most of you rather watch Canucks, Blue Jays or CFL. Cricket will never be more than curiosity.

Canada isn't a huge sporting country anyway and don't win a bucketload of medals at the Olympics like the US or China.

What I'm saying is that those two countries and a few others like Britain/Germany try to compete in every sport possible and cricket at Olympics will mean that atleast they will be assembling a team. There are many sports in the Olympics which do not have alot of viewership but these same countries compete in them just so they can win more medals.
 
The reason is not so we can have another prestigious tournament, it's so that other countries can pick up the sport as well. Countries that don' play cricket much get funded so little. I read somewhere that if cricket was to become an Olympic sport, China's annual funding would go much, much higher.

again waste of money and resources.

There is no way a new team could enter amongest the top 12 teams. It aint that easy.
Even getting all the games done in a month would be really hard, especially if there is only 1 playing wicket.

Better thing to do is start a Hong Kong sixes style tourny for the Olympics, keeps all teams in balance.
 
6 teams will mean West Indies and Srilanka would miss the tournament.

not really.

What happens is they end up putting age restrictions on the good teams just to level the playing field. ridiculous stuff honestly.

But thats how it is.

also they will have to add continental qualification
 
again waste of money and resources.

There is no way a new team could enter amongest the top 12 teams. It aint that easy.
Even getting all the games done in a month would be really hard, especially if there is only 1 playing wicket.

Better thing to do is start a Hong Kong sixes style tourny for the Olympics, keeps all teams in balance.

You need to introduce them somehow, being in the top 12 is far far away.
 
6 teams will mean West Indies and Srilanka would miss the tournament.

It would depend who would actually send a side. Not sure if GB would send one or not for starters.

Also why does he say it would have to be limited to 6-8 teams being a team sport? Football had 24 whilst hockey, basketball, handball, rugby and water polo all had 12.
 
You need to introduce them somehow, being in the top 12 is far far away.

you already have the world division leagues going on, and thats how Afghanistan got into cricket and Hong Kong got its ODI status.

Having another cricket tourney is just useless, you cant even play your best 11 in such events just to even out the playing fields for other countries.

i will go for this idea if they make the tournament a knockout and be replaced with the champions trophy with a team with no restrictions being allowed to play
 
It would depend who would actually send a side. Not sure if GB would send one or not for starters.

Also why does he say it would have to be limited to 6-8 teams being a team sport? Football had 24 whilst hockey, basketball, handball, rugby and water polo all had 12.

T20 games could take like 4 hours, plus there will be only 1 ground on which 2 wickets would be used. Wickets need to be remade after every match, or else an unmade wicket could just destroy the batting team.

Olympics are very short
 
you already have the world division leagues going on, and thats how Afghanistan got into cricket and Hong Kong got its ODI status.

Having another cricket tourney is just useless, you cant even play your best 11 in such events just to even out the playing fields for other countries.

i will go for this idea if they make the tournament a knockout and be replaced with the champions trophy with a team with no restrictions being allowed to play

Being in the Olympics would have the potential to increase the funding for cricket in countries where it's currently unheard of hugely. Having it in the Olympics for that reason alone is worth it.
 
T20 games could take like 4 hours, plus there will be only 1 ground on which 2 wickets would be used. Wickets need to be remade after every match, or else an unmade wicket could just destroy the batting team.

Olympics are very short

12 teams, 4 groups of 3. 3 games per group, 12 games in the group stages get them done in 4 days. Semi finals and a final done the day after and you're done in 5 days. Either have 3 drop in pitches making up the square for the games or play it on an artificial wicket if you really need to.

Alternatively make it HK6s style, have 16 teams in 4 groups of 4. 24 group games over 4/5 days, 4 quarter finals the day after then a semi final and semis and a final the day after that. All done in 6/7 days.
 
Olympic will grow cricket as associate countries' government will invest more. Only Olympic and T20 leagues are the hope for associate cricket nations.
 
The time was ripe in 2012.

It was going to be held in Eng and the T20 format had proven to be a mega success.

It would have been a massive hit in 2012.
 
It would be great for the game and don't mind the format being T20 either
 
Cricket At Olympics: It's Not About Making Money, Says ICC CEO Geoff Allardice

ICC CEO Geoff Allardice on Sunday said the ICC's bid for cricket's inclusion at the Olympics is not aimed at making money but it's about taking the sport to non-cricketing markets to grow its global reach. (More Cricket News)

Allardice made the statement following the ICC's push for inclusion of the sport in the Olympics after women's T20 cricket is set to make its debut at the 2022 Commonwealth Games in Birmingham.

The men's competition has already made its debut at the 1998 Commonwealth Games in Kuala Lumpur.

"In many of our members, being seen as an Olympic sport and having an association with the government and the national Olympic movement is something that is going to be really beneficial in terms of facilities and high-performance assistance,” Allardice was quoted as saying in SEN Radio show 'This Is Your Journey – thanks to Tobin Brothers'.

"It's certainly not a money-making exercise from our point of view, it's about getting exposure for cricket in markets where we may not be popular.

"And the other one is about giving all of our 106 members the opportunity to engage more closely with their governments."

The ICC top official said being a part of the Olympics is key to building strong relationship with respective governments in many of its member nations.

"In some countries, being an Olympic sport gets you closer to your government than not being an Olympic sport," Allardice said.

The ICC had last year confirmed its intention to bid for cricket's inclusion in the Olympic Games and is working towards becoming a part of the Olympic family for the 2028 Los Angeles, 2032 Brisbane Games and beyond.

https://www.outlookindia.com/sports...oney-says-icc-ceo-geoff-allardice-news-189862
 
The new Chairman elect of ICC, Jay Shah shared following ambitions regarding the sport of cricket:

“While we will build on the valuable lessons learned, we must also embrace fresh thinking and innovation to elevate the love for cricket worldwide. The inclusion of our sport in the Olympics at LA 2028 represents a significant inflection point for the growth of cricket, and I am confident that it will drive the sport forward in unprecedented ways.”
 
The new Chairman elect of ICC, Jay Shah shared following ambitions regarding the sport of cricket:

“While we will build on the valuable lessons learned, we must also embrace fresh thinking and innovation to elevate the love for cricket worldwide. The inclusion of our sport in the Olympics at LA 2028 represents a significant inflection point for the growth of cricket, and I am confident that it will drive the sport forward in unprecedented ways.”

Chat GPT at work again. His real prose is like this:

 
would probably be a joke format like t10 to slot into a packed schedule
still though we might have an outside chance of bronze
 
Los Angeles 28 could take cricket 4,000km in search of audience

the requirement that an Olympic Games must be held in the host city and only exceptionally can events be scheduled in other cities, usually because of the need for specific facilities (football stadiums, regatta courses if the venue is inland...) is increasingly theoretical. Paris 2024 already had events in Lille and Chateauroux and now Los Angeles 2024 is considering taking the cricket competitions to the East Coast of the United States, some 4,000 kilometers away to reduce the time difference with India and Pakistan.

Novak Djokovic shows off incredible versatility: Cricket gymnastics, basketball all in one go
According to the president of the Los Angeles 2028 organizing committee, Casey Wasserman, the possibility is on the table, despite the fact that there are no cricket facilities in California and Los Angeles 2028 does not plan to build new facilities. The main market for cricket is in India and Pakistan, two countries with little weight in the world of sport despite their population (more than 1.66 billion people currently), but which now find that one of the few sports in which they have a leading role will become Olympic.

However, if cricket competitions were to be held in California, they would have to contend with a 12-and-a-half-hour time difference. On the East Coast, the situation is not much better, but it would be three hours less.

The potential market is huge. The India-Sri Lanka match at the 2011 Men's World Cup attracted 558 million viewers and the semi-final between India and Pakistan attracted 495 million. The India-Australia match at the 2023 World Cup attracted 'only' 300 million.

Source: Marca
 
I don't agree or support the idea - cricket should never be part of Olympics.

What are they going to contest form - T20, T10, Six a Side ..... these jokes don't represent cricket, neither showcase the skills of cricket. The sports will be misinterpret, if it's represented by something which actually isn't cricket. Yes, T20/10/5, Six/Five a Side ... sort of games do use Cricket gears, rules & regulations..... but so does futsol, beach soccer, 5 a side indoor soccer - do we call them association football!!!

If cricket is to be part of Olympics, it has to be Test cricket, or at least ODI - which I think isn't possible for a 2.5 weeks tournament. Rather than represented by a perverted version, I would take it out of the show - there are 35+ events in Olympics, they should pick from those, cricket is fine as boring & slow as it is - something I watched for last 3 weeks, sacrificing most of my sleep.
 
I don't agree or support the idea - cricket should never be part of Olympics.

What are they going to contest form - T20, T10, Six a Side ..... these jokes don't represent cricket, neither showcase the skills of cricket. The sports will be misinterpret, if it's represented by something which actually isn't cricket. Yes, T20/10/5, Six/Five a Side ... sort of games do use Cricket gears, rules & regulations..... but so does futsol, beach soccer, 5 a side indoor soccer - do we call them association football!!!

If cricket is to be part of Olympics, it has to be Test cricket, or at least ODI - which I think isn't possible for a 2.5 weeks tournament. Rather than represented by a perverted version, I would take it out of the show - there are 35+ events in Olympics, they should pick from those, cricket is fine as boring & slow as it is - something I watched for last 3 weeks, sacrificing most of my sleep.
The problem is there is not many of us left who will sacrifice sleep for cricket.

If left as is, the test game will die anyway with or without olympics.

But there is a small hope that fans introduced through T20 olympics ( a small percentage) can grow into cricket fans and help keep the game going.
 
ICC Chair meets with IOC President to discuss key LA 2028 Initiatives for Cricket

ICC Chair Jay Shah this week met with IOC President Thomas Bach and other senior officials from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and attended an LA 2028 International Federations seminar at the Olympic House in Lausanne, Switzerland.

The ICC Chair was also joined by ICC Chief Executive, Geoff Allardice with the meeting focusing on key areas of collaboration between the ICC and the IOC in the build-up to the LA 2028 Olympic Games.

This was the first time Mr Shah was meeting with Mr Bach and they explored potential avenues for collaboration in promoting the Olympic values of excellence, friendship, and respect within the cricketing world.

It is an exciting time for cricket with tremendous opportunity to engage with existing and new fans ahead of the LA 2028 Games, paving the way for potential future collaborations with the Olympic movement that will benefit athletes, fans, and the global sporting community.

ICC Chair, Jay Shah said: “We were delighted to meet with Thomas Bach and IOC officials, it was a productive meeting and an important milestone on the road to LA 2028. The inclusion of cricket in the Olympic Games represents a watershed moment for our sport and a real opportunity for transformative growth for 2028 and beyond.

“We discussed a range of critical issues and continued to build relationships with our friends across the Olympic movement. We look forward to the next three and half years working in collaboration with the IOC and LA 2028.”
 
Back
Top