What's new

Uranium detected in breastmilk samples in Bihar, 70% of infants at risk: Study

Ball Blazer

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 13, 2025
Runs
3,734
A new scientific study has raised red flags over the presence of uranium in the breastmilk of lactating mothers across six districts of Bihar, indicating potential health risks for infants who rely exclusively on breastmilk during their early months of life. The research, published in Scientific Reports, is the first assessment of uranium contamination in breastmilk in the Gangetic plains of Bihar — a region already known for toxic exposure to heavy metals like arsenic, lead and mercury.

DISTRICT-WISE VARIATION

The study mapped uranium levels district by district. The data tables revealed that Khagaria bore the highest average burden. The decreasing order of mean exposure to uranium [U238] contamination is: Khagaria > Samastipur > Begusarai > Katihar > Bhojpur > Nalanda.

-Katihar recorded the highest single peak uranium concentration at 5.25 g/L.
-Khagaria showed the highest mean (average) contamination level at 4.035 g/L.
-Nalanda had the lowest mean concentration at 2.354 g/L.

Spatial maps in the study visually establish uranium spread across these districts, hinting at underlying hydrogeochemical patterns and environmental sources.

The researchers analysed breastmilk samples from 40 lactating mothers between 17 and 35 years of age, selected from Bhojpur, Samastipur, Begusarai, Khagaria, Katihar, and Nalanda. Every participant provided informed consent, and detailed interviews were conducted to understand breastfeeding practices, child growth, and residential history. The study was conducted by teams from Mahavir Cancer Sansthan & Research Centre (Patna), Lovely Professional University, NIPER-Hajipur, and other collaborating institutions.

ALL SAMPLES CONTAINED URANIUM

One of the most striking findings is stated clearly in the paper: “The present study reports 100% lactating mothers having their breastmilk highly contaminated with uranium.”

Although the concentration varied from sample to sample, every single breastmilk sample showed detectable uranium (U-238), with values ranging up to 5.25 g/L. While no international body has set an official permissible limit for uranium in breastmilk, the presence of any radioactive heavy metal in infant food sources is considered a matter of health concern.

INFANTS FACE HIGHER RISK THAN MOTHERS

To understand how uranium exposure might affect babies, the researchers assessed how much uranium infants may ingest through breastmilk. Using a Monte Carlo simulation (a statistical technique that ran 10,000 iterations to predict risk scenarios), the analysis showed that about 70% of the infants were at risk of developing non-cancer health effects if exposure continued.

The study notes that “infants are highly vulnerable... in comparison to their mothers” because their organs are still developing, their body weight is low, and they cannot flush out uranium as efficiently. Because of this, even small amounts of uranium can have a proportionally larger impact on infants.

SHOULD MOTHERS STOP BREASTFEEDING?

Despite alarming findings, the study strongly cautions against any abrupt shift away from breastfeeding. The authors state: “It is also recommended to emphasise that breastfeeding is the optimal method for infant nutrition, and its discontinuation should only occur based on clinical indication.” They note that breastmilk offers unmatched nutritional and immunological benefits, and the uranium levels detected, while concerning, do not warrant stopping breastfeeding without medical advice.

WHAT CAN BE DONE?

The study concludes with a call for:

-Statewide biomonitoring of uranium contamination
-Regular groundwater testing
-Public health advisories, especially for pregnant and breastfeeding women
-Further research into uranium mobility in water, soil, and food chains
-Safer water access, including filtration methods capable of removing uranium (e.g., RO systems)

The authors stress that: “There is also a need for biomonitoring of U238 in these regions at a broader level.”

GROWING PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN

Bihar has already faced headlines for arsenic, lead, and mercury contamination in the past decade, with several studies — including some by the same research team — reporting heavy metal exposure in both mothers and infants.

This latest uranium study underscores a recurring theme: the environmental burden on Bihar’s families, especially in rural districts where groundwater is the lifeline.

 
Dr Ashok Sharma from AIIMS said the source of uranium is not yet known. He said, “We do not know where this uranium is coming from. The Geological Survey of India is also trying to find out. Uranium can enter the food chain and cause cancer, neurological problems and affect the growth of children. This is a very serious concern.”

Insane .. how did uranium come in contact?
 
Literally BIMARU.

We pay so much taxes and instead we can't get anything other than trash roads, air, water, schools, hospitals and now milk.
 
This is why I say don’t read too much into 4th largest economy etc etc. sounds great when you compare to rest of third world, but India is still very much third world… this is an insane discovery. Masses of new borns at risk of uranium exposure is no joke, 70% is crazy.
 
Clearly food and or water supply is contaminated.

May also explain the behaviour of some posters on PP :D
 
Clearly food and or water supply is contaminated.

May also explain the behaviour of some posters on PP :D

ROFL! True.

To be honest, I don't mind if sanghis get uranium in their system. I mean adult sanghis (not the kids). They are like the evil Nazis.

As for non-sanghis and decent Indians, I hope they will be safe. :inti
 
This is why I say don’t read too much into 4th largest economy etc etc. sounds great when you compare to rest of third world, but India is still very much third world… this is an insane discovery. Masses of new borns at risk of uranium exposure is no joke, 70% is crazy.
Imagine spiraling this thread into India being third world country. Dude, give some rest to your crying mind. 4rth largest or not, India is still the fastest growing major economy. Deep down, I know you wish for Pakistan to have a similar growth trajectory.

Coming to the point, it is unfortunate that while country was moving towards IT and corporate employment in 2000’s, Bihar was still stuck in GUNDA raj. Give them a break my fellow Indians, for its not the fault of the people. Even now, its politics is muddled by inept leaders. In any other South / West Indian state, these issues would have been the hot topics and been dealt with.

A similar issues arose in Andhra (Uddanam) region where people were suffering with kidney issues from unknown land/water contamination. Government is providing free dialysis to 10,000+ patients (from both Central and State governments)


I am sure people know nit everyone can afford dialysis even in the US.

Obviously, parts of India is literally poor. But those parts of India that contributed to us becoming the 4rth largest economy is supporting with the issues in poorer states.

Thanks for the report who brought it to the light as the government can focus on resolving it.

Instead of taking potshots, you should ask Pakistan on eradicating polio, where most of countries have eradicated it by 2000’s
 
Imagine spiraling this thread into India being third world country. Dude, give some rest to your crying mind. 4rth largest or not, India is still the fastest growing major economy. Deep down, I know you wish for Pakistan to have a similar growth trajectory.

India is a 3rd world unappealing $hithole just like many other 3rd world countries (Bangladesh, Bolivia, Nigeria etc.).

India is all about quanity over quality.

I also think India faked a lot of their numbers. It is possible they are not the 4th largest. :inti

 
Imagine spiraling this thread into India being third world country. Dude, give some rest to your crying mind. 4rth largest or not, India is still the fastest growing major economy. Deep down, I know you wish for Pakistan to have a similar growth trajectory.

Coming to the point, it is unfortunate that while country was moving towards IT and corporate employment in 2000’s, Bihar was still stuck in GUNDA raj. Give them a break my fellow Indians, for its not the fault of the people. Even now, its politics is muddled by inept leaders. In any other South / West Indian state, these issues would have been the hot topics and been dealt with.

A similar issues arose in Andhra (Uddanam) region where people were suffering with kidney issues from unknown land/water contamination. Government is providing free dialysis to 10,000+ patients (from both Central and State governments)


I am sure people know nit everyone can afford dialysis even in the US.

Obviously, parts of India is literally poor. But those parts of India that contributed to us becoming the 4rth largest economy is supporting with the issues in poorer states.

Thanks for the report who brought it to the light as the government can focus on resolving it.

Instead of taking potshots, you should ask Pakistan on eradicating polio, where most of countries have eradicated it by 2000’s
You sound emotional. Not sure why.

There’s positive tracker threads for India and many other like minded threads that paint it as some utopia when that isn’t reality. Issues like this show that.

No need to get butt-hurt.
 
India is a 3rd world unappealing $hithole just like many other 3rd world countries (Bangladesh, Bolivia, Nigeria etc.).

India is all about quanity over quality.

I also think India faked a lot of their numbers. It is possible they are not the 4th largest. :inti

Please stick to your typical religious extremism and don't poke nose into economics which you have no clue about.

A 2024 World Bank studyfound that between 2010 and 2020, the IMF and World Bank got same-year GDP growth estimates wrong by around 1.3–1.5% on average. And the largest errors were in the Middle East and North Africa, where economic data is often weak or delayed.

But India seems to fare well. Because the IMF updates India’s forecasts far more frequently than it does for most countries. While many economies get only two updates a year, India often triggers mid-year revisions in the WEO, because its economic data moves quickly.



Infact, India fares the highest among data completeness. Better than China, Bangladesh and Pakistan etc with revisions being very minimal.


I have shown you with World bank data that, India has better robustness in GDP numbers than other emerging nations. Now, show me the evidence that India manipulated numbers.

Or else, you will run away like you always do. Zero contribution to any discussion other than the typical hatred spewing.

I am not an ungrateful person like some who can call their own country as a ****-hole. At least I try to make my life better in my country and wishes that my country develops faster. Such a pathetic loser behavior that you want to bring your own country down for the sake of argument. India like Pakistan, Bangladesh etc may be poorer compared to the West but its not a ****-hole. We don't call out home that way.
 
You sound emotional. Not sure why.

There’s positive tracker threads for India and many other like minded threads that paint it as some utopia when that isn’t reality. Issues like this show that.

No need to get butt-hurt.
Ahh! When someone tries to have a logical argument, you call that emotional. I can see the burn in your posts trying to take potshots against India, and I cannot even blame you. I know its hard for you as your establishment is spiraling your country down and you wish for India the same, the typical CRAB mentality.

But the least I can do is to teach you the reality.
 
Ahh! When someone tries to have a logical argument, you call that emotional. I can see the burn in your posts trying to take potshots against India, and I cannot even blame you. I know its hard for you as your establishment is spiraling your country down and you wish for India the same, the typical CRAB mentality.

But the least I can do is to teach you the reality.
I literally said it being 4th best economy wise puts it ahead of rest of the third world… which would include Pakistan, you do realize that right?

You can’t tell me with a straight face that India isn’t brandished as some sort of utopia on this forum by a lot of Indians.

The discovery in this research shows that that isn’t the case.

But you’re reading too much into it and overthinking things from my post and fighting ghosts. All good. Keep swinging lol.
 
You can’t tell me with a straight face that India isn’t brandished as some sort of utopia on this forum by a lot of Indians.
I dont think any sane Indian would claim India as utopia. But certainly, India is a land of opportunities now. On the contrast, its posters like you who call India some sort of dead economy and continue to take potshots.
The discovery in this research shows that that isn’t the case.

But you’re reading too much into it and overthinking things from my post and fighting ghosts. All good. Keep swinging lol.
I don't even know how this discovery ties to the economy. May be if the government ignores it and the issue persists, then may be.

Your logic was absurd and just want to discredit India’s growth. India have lot of issues but issues like these are outliers and our governments are dealing with it.
 
This is why I say don’t read too much into 4th largest economy etc etc. sounds great when you compare to rest of third world, but India is still very much third world… this is an insane discovery. Masses of new borns at risk of uranium exposure is no joke, 70% is crazy.
That’s actually true but that’s also the reason many don’t take American or Chinese economic numbers seriously compared to Japanese and Europeans who have much higher standards of living..(for now)

In terms of health inspite of decent gdp India is behind Nepal Bhutan Lanka in South Asia.. but that’s because population is a bane, and nothing to be proud of having 5th largest economy but these are different things, it’s because of inequality.
 
Back
Top