What's new

US mainstream conservative media exposed. Tucker's true feelings about Trump revealed

Stewie

Test Debutant
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Runs
15,639
On Jan. 4, 2021, Fox News host Tucker Carlson was done with Donald Trump.

"We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can’t wait," he texted an unidentified person.

"I hate him passionately. ... I can’t handle much more of this," he added.

By this time, Fox News was in crisis mode. It had angered its audience when it correctly said Joe Biden had won Arizona in the presidential election. Executives and hosts were worried about losing viewers to upstart rivals, most notably Newsmax.

The private comments were a far cry from what Carlson's viewers were used to hearing from the stalwart conservative host on his prime-time show every night.

“We’re all pretending we’ve got a lot to show for it, because admitting what a disaster it’s been is too tough to digest,” he wrote in another text message, referring to the "last four years." “But come on. There isn’t really an upside to Trump.”


The revelation is in hundreds of pages of testimony, private text messages and emails from top Fox News journalists and executives that were made public Tuesday, adding to the trove of documents that show a network in crisis after it alienated core viewers by reporting accurately on the results of the 2020 presidential election.

A judge unsealed the documents, along with parts of some employee depositions, as part of Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News.

The messages are blunt and, at times, profane, as hosts and top executives panicked about how to boost their ratings as Trump refused to acknowledge his defeat. The depositions, meanwhile, offer the broadest picture yet of how executives including Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch allowed baseless conspiracy theories to flourish on air.

In a statement, Fox News accused Dominion of dishonestly portraying key figures' internal communications.

“Thanks to today’s filings, Dominion has been caught red handed using more distortions and misinformation in their PR campaign to smear FOX News and trample on free speech and freedom of the press," the statement said. "We already know they will say and do anything to try to win this case, but to twist and even misattribute quotes to the highest levels of our company is truly beyond the pale.”

Smaller snippets of the exchanges were referred to in two Dominion briefs made public in a Delaware court last month, when Dominion sought a summary judgment ruling from the judge and opposed Fox News' motion asking the judge to dismiss the case.

Dominion's briefs previously revealed that top figures at Fox News privately blasted election fraud claims as "crazy" and "insane," even as the network aired them on television, and that top boss Murdoch considered some of Trump's voter fraud claims to be “bulls--- and damaging” yet acknowledged in a deposition that he did nothing to rein in hosts who were promoting the bogus claims in the days after the 2020 election.

“The emails, texts, and deposition testimony speak for themselves. We welcome all scrutiny of our evidence because it all leads to the same place — Fox knowingly spread lies causing enormous damage to an American company," a Dominion spokesman told NBC News.

Dominion, a voting machine company, sued Fox News in March 2021, alleging it caused "severe damage" by giving oxygen to conspiracy theories it knew were false, including bogus claims that Dominion equipment was used to rig the 2020 election for Biden, that it was tied to the late Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez and that it bribed U.S. government officials.

Tensions between Trump and Fox News have escalated in recent months as more revelations have come out and as Murdoch's media empire has featured Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a possible 2024 rival. Steve Bannon, a former White House official and longtime Trump ally, has in essence declared war on Murdoch and Fox. Trump has also been going after them in messages on his Truth Social platform.

Fox News has said it was "proud of our 2020 election coverage, which stands in the highest tradition of American journalism," and it argued that the Dominion lawsuit is designed only to garner headlines. Dominion argues that the First Amendment does not allow media outlets to broadcast conspiracy theories they know are false.

“As the dominant media company among those viewers dissatisfied with the election results, Fox gave these fictions a prominence they otherwise would never have achieved. With Fox’s global platform, an audience of hundreds of millions, and the inevitable and extensive republication and dissemination of the falsehoods through social media, these lies deeply damaged Dominion’s once-thriving business,” the 441-page lawsuit says. “Fox took a small flame and turned it into a forest fire.”

Here are some of the key highlights:

Murdoch worried Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham 'went too far'
In his email to Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott on Jan. 21, 2021, the day after Biden was inaugurated, Murdoch discussed the heat he was getting from GOP senators for stories suggesting the election had been stolen.

“Still getting mud thrown at us!” Murdoch wrote. “Maybe Sean and Laura went too far,” he continued, referring to prime-time hosts Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham.

He also asked Scott whether it was “unarguable that high profile Fox voices fed the story that the election was stolen and that January 6th an important chance to have the result overturned.”

Scott punted the request to a group of executives, noting “please send specifics.”

Six hours later, Irena Briganti, the Fox News executive in charge of communications, responded with more than 15 pages of transcripts of examples.

In a group text chain from mid-November, Hannity, Ingraham and Carlson complained about their news colleagues and the network’s decision to call Arizona in favor of Biden. Fox News was the first network to do so, and the call was accurate.

“Why would anyone defend that call,” Hannity asked.

“My anger at the news channel is pronounced,” Ingraham said later in the exchange.

Carlson piped in, saying: “It should be. We devote our lives to building an audience and they let Chris Wallace and Leland [expletive] Vittert wreck it. Too much.”

Wallace and Vittert were Fox News hosts and anchors at the time.

In text messages with Bannon on Nov. 10, 2020, Fox News host Maria Bartiromo said, "Omg I'm so depressed. I can't take this," and lamented how upsetting it was to watch the "world move forward."

"I want to see massive fraud exposed. Will he be able to turn this around," she added, referring to Trump. "I told my team we are not allowed to say pres elect at all. Not in scripts or in banners on air. Until this moves through the courts."

"You are our fighter," Bannon later replied. "Enough with the sad ! We need u."

Biden was projected the winner of the presidential race on Nov. 7.

In an email to former Fox executive Preston Padden 20 days after the election, Murdoch said he believed the network was "navigating" everything "pretty well."

"And losing tons of viewers - but not leadership yet! Just have to hold our nerve and up our game! In another month Trump will be becoming irrelevant and we'll have lots to say about Biden, Dems, and appointments - so far pretty dull," he predicted.

Murdoch's name is redacted, but the email was mentioned and attributed to him in previously released briefs.

In a conversation with Fox News journalist Chris Stirewalt on Dec. 2, 2020, about a month after the election, Bill Sammon, who was then the network's managing editor, lamented the state of the place they worked.

"More than 20 minutes into our flagship evening news broadcast and we're still focused solely on supposed election fraud — a month after the election. It's remarkable how weak ratings make good journalists do bad things," Sammon said.

Stirewalt added: "It's a real mess. But sadly no surprise based on the man I saw revealed on election night."

Sammon replied, "In my 22 years affiliated with Fox, this is the closest thing I've seen to an existential crisis — at least journalistically."

Stirewalt later said he believed they were "losing the silent majority of viewers as we chase the nuts off a cliff."

Carlson, one of Fox News' top hosts, made it clear on Jan. 4, 2021, that he was getting fed up with Trump. In a text exchange with an unknown person, Carlson said: "We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can't wait."

"I hate him passionately. I blew up at Peter Navarro today in frustration," he added, referring to the former Trump administration official. "I actually like Peter. But I can't handle much more of this."

He wrote in another text message: "That's the last four years. We're all pretending we've got a lot to show for it, because admitting what a disaster it's been is too tough to digest. But come on. There isn't really an upside to Trump."

Carlson, however, has complained about how reporters appear to "hate Trump with an all-consuming mania," as he did in a segment on Oct. 30, 2020.

In an email Jan. 12 to Paul Ryan — the former House speaker from Wisconsin who served on Fox Corp.'s board — and his son Lachlan Murdoch, Rupert Murdoch talked about the fallout from the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.

"Just talked at length with Suzanne Scott," he said, referring to the Fox News CEO. "Everything changed last Wednesday. She thinks everyone is now disgusted and previous supporters broken hearted."

Murdoch also said Trump was now in serious trouble.

"His businesses now ruined!" he said. "Who is going to throw a party at one of his golf clubs or hotels? Let alone a tournament. So he has more than just legal problems, bad though they are. The brand is now poison! Who wants Ivanka's fashion lines, jewelry, etc?!"

Murdoch even wondered whether Trump could resign and have Vice President Mike Pence pardon him.

The newly unsealed documents call into question whether Murdoch did in fact share unaired Biden campaign ads with the Trump campaign through Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser, as a Dominion filing last week claimed.

In his sworn deposition, Murdoch both denies and admits to having shared campaign ads with the Trump campaign before they were public. In emails released as exhibits, Murdoch promises to share an ad timed for a football game. It is unclear whether he is talking about an aired or an unaired ad.

“Mr. Murdoch forwarded an already-publicly available Biden campaign ad which was available on YouTube,” a Fox Corp. spokesman, Lauren Townsend, said in an email to NBC News.

Two groups filed complaints with the Federal Election Commission against the Trump campaign and Fox Corp. over the alleged ad sharing.

Two days after the 2020 election, Hannity was making Fox Corp. lawyer Viet Dinh nervous.

"Let's continue to buckle up for the ride for next 24 hours," Dinh wrote in an email to other top executives. "Hannity is getting awfully close to the line with his commentary and guests tonight."

The week after the election, Fox Corp. Senior Vice President Raj Shah sent around a memo about the state of the Fox "brand" — and it showed that the network was taking a severe hit from its conservative audience.

"This week we continued to see extremely high levels of conservative discontent towards Fox News, both on social media and in the pro-Trump commentariat," read the weekly report on Nov. 13. "Roughly half of the top 100 tweets and a third of the top 100 Facebook posts mentioning Fox News were from angry conservatives criticizing Fox or threatening to boycott the network. Both Donald Trump and Newsmax have taken active roles in promoting attacks on Fox News, including by pushing leaked footage and false reports about Fox News talent."

The report included a graph showing Fox News' net favorability among its viewers that week — with a trend line dropping dramatically.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...sages-emails-released-dominion-suit-rcna72693
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump seems like a hard guy to like and work with. To many, he's not fit for the top job and is always the brunt of jokes. I'm genuinely amazed at how successful he's been in politics
 
Trump wasnt good but he isnt as bad as the liberal media and their minions (most South Asians in the US among them) make him out to be
At the very least he doesnt believe in kids being encouraged to change their genders
 
Amazing to see how Fox's relationship with Trump has changed over years.
 
Trump wasnt good but he isnt as bad as the liberal media and their minions (most South Asians in the US among them) make him out to be
At the very least he doesnt believe in kids being encouraged to change their genders

He believes in whatever advances him on a moment-by-moment basis. If he thought trans kids would win him votes he would be for them.

The man fomented an assault on his own government because he was pathologically unable to accept that he lost the election. How much worse can you get than that?
 
One of the most anticipated defamation trials in recent US history is about to start, pitting one of the world's most famous news brands against a little known voting technology firm.

At stake is the reputation of Fox News, the strength of US libel laws versus the right to free speech and a sense of where the false 2020 election claims go next.

The start of the trial was postponed until Tuesday amid reports the two sides are in settlement talks.

Here's a few key questions about the case and what to look for if it goes to trial.


What exactly is Fox accused of?

In the lawsuit, Dominion Voting Systems - whose equipment was used in 28 states during the election - argues that Fox News on-air personalities regularly repeated and amplified anti-Dominion conspiracy theories and demonstrably false claims about the firm in order to avoid a backlash from a largely pro-Trump audience.

As the outgoing president, Mr Trump had attacked the voting machine company, claiming it rigged the election to favour winner Joe Biden.

These claims, for example, included assertions that Dominion altered voting results and that it worked with late Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez to create machines that would "make sure he never lost an election".

Dominion claims that these allegations hurt the company's business and its reputation - and is now seeking $1.6bn (£1.3bn) in damages.

To prove that defamation took place, Dominion's lawyers will have to argue that Fox News willingly and knowingly provided false information to its viewers, despite knowing that the information was untrue.

Their case will rely heavily on emails, text messages and depositions showing that Fox employees - ranging from producers and journalists to on-air personalities and executives - in which they questioned and belittled the claims about Dominion.


How will Fox defend itself?

Ahead of the trial, Judge Eric Davis ruled that the claims made against Dominion have already been proven false.

This means that jurors are not expected to deliberate on the validity of claims themselves.

Instead, they will have to decide whether Fox acted with "actual malice" by knowingly providing falsehoods to its viewers, despite knowing that the information was untrue.

To defend itself against these claims, Fox's attorneys will argue that its reporting on Dominion was legitimate journalism in which its reporters and commentators reported on fraud allegations, rather than endorsing them.

"It is plain as day that any reasonable viewer would understand that Fox News was covering and commenting on allegations about Dominion," a Fox court filing argued. "Not reporting that the allegations were true."

This sort of coverage, Fox has claimed, is protected by the First Amendment to the US Constitution which guarantees freedom of expression and the press.

In a statement sent to the BBC in February, Fox also claimed that the Dominion lawsuit "mischaracterizes the facts by cherry-picking soundbites, omitting key context, and mischaracterizing the record".


Will Rupert Murdoch testify?

One highlight of the upcoming court proceedings will be the expected appearance of Rupert Murdoch, the billionaire owner of Fox News.

While his appearance has not been confirmed, Bloomberg - citing people familiar with the lawsuit - has reported that Mr Murdoch is expected to testify as early as Monday or Tuesday.

If he does testify, Mr Murdoch will face questions by Dominion's attorneys about the Fox News hosts and guests who made unsubstantiated claims about Dominion, as well as about his role in the coverage.


Rupert Murdoch is expected to testify alongside several other Fox figures, including his son Lachlan.

In a sworn deposition filed in February, Mr Murdoch appeared to acknowledge that many of the claims were baseless and without merit, and said that he did not personally believe that Dominion "engaged in a massive and coordinated effort to steal the 2020 presidential election".

"Some of our commentators were endorsing it," he said in the deposition, referring to falsehoods about Dominion. "I would have liked us to be stronger in denouncing it, in hindsight."

Mr Murdoch's son Lachlan - the CEO of Fox Corp, one of the defendants in the case - is also expected to testify.


What about Tucker Carlson?

Among the Fox News TV hosts that is expected to testify is Tucker Carlson, host of the network's top-rated programme.

Court documents have revealed that Mr Carlson - a vocal supporter of Donald Trump - was privately contemptuous of the former president and dismissive of many of the claims against Dominion, calling them "absurd" and "insane".

"I hate him [Trump] passionately," reads one text message from Mr Carlson that was included in Dominion's court documents. "What he's good at is destroying things. He's the undisputed world champion of that."

In another message, Mr Carlson said he felt that Fox was "very close" to being able to ignore Mr Trump.

"I truly can't wait," he wrote.

BBC
 
Dominion should be able to take Fox to the cleaners, its an open and shut case really. If they fail to do so, their lawyers would have done a pretty poor job.
 
Dominion should be able to take Fox to the cleaners, its an open and shut case really. If they fail to do so, their lawyers would have done a pretty poor job.

I was talking to a friend who is Ivy League lawyer. He said it wil be very hard to concoct Fox News It’s very hard to prove malicious deliberate intent. . Fox will use freedom of speech cover. They are scared for sure .
 
I was talking to a friend who is Ivy League lawyer. He said it wil be very hard to concoct Fox News It’s very hard to prove malicious deliberate intent. . Fox will use freedom of speech cover. They are scared for sure .

I guess I got one over your ivy leaguer lawyer friend.

Fox is settling with Dominion for approximately $800 million. That’s a pretty big chunk of change. It means they feared losing even more in damages if the case had gone to court.
 
Fox News will pay more than $787 million to Dominion Voting Systems after the sides hammered out a last-minute settlement Tuesday in the explosive defamation case launched against the right-wing network.
Fox acknowledged the court's rulings finding "certain claims about Dominion to be false." However, the network will not have to admit on air that it spread election lies, a Dominion rep said.
By settling, influential Fox executives and prominent on-air personalities will be spared from testifying about their 2020 election coverage, which was filled with lies about voter fraud.
Dominion also has pending lawsuits against right-wing networks Newsmax and OAN, as well as against Trump allies Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Mike Lindell.





So basically they are paying this much money because they don’t want to apologize and lose all their customer base. So they knew they would have to if the case went to court. Haha
 
Fox have got away with it. $700mn is peanuts and as their viewers don't even know that they have admitted liability, they dont lose anything.
 
Fox have got away with it. $700mn is peanuts and as their viewers don't even know that they have admitted liability, they dont lose anything.

No they have not. They just avoided saying they are sorry. The settlement is one the largest in media history and the fact they settled out of court for that much says a lot
 
I guess I got one over your ivy leaguer lawyer friend.

Fox is settling with Dominion for approximately $800 million. That’s a pretty big chunk of change. It means they feared losing even more in damages if the case had gone to court.

Hahhahaha yup. That went fast
 
Fox News has settled a defamation lawsuit from the voting machine company, Dominion, over its reporting of the 2020 presidential election.

In a last-minute settlement before trial, the network agreed to pay $787.5m (£634m) - about half of the $1.6bn initially sought by Dominion.

Dominion argued its business was harmed by Fox spreading false claims the vote had been rigged against Donald Trump.

The deal spares Fox executives such as Rupert Murdoch from having to testify.

The judge in the case is not required to give his approval for the agreement.

Fox said Tuesday's settlement in one of the most anticipated defamation trials in recent US history reflected its "commitment to the highest journalistic standards".

The Fox statement added without elaborating that the network "acknowledges the court's rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false".

Dominion chief executive John Poulos told a press conference the deal included Fox "admitting to telling lies, causing enormous damage to my company".

Justin Nelson, a Dominion attorney, told reporters that "the truth matters".

"Lies have consequences," he added. "Over two years ago a torrent of lies swept Dominion and election officials across America into an alternative universe of conspiracy theories, causing grievous harm to Dominion and the country."

Mr Nelson added that for "democracy to endure", Americans must "share a commitment to facts".

Opening arguments in the case had been due to start on Tuesday afternoon.

The announcement of a settlement came after an unexplained delay of several hours once jury selection had finished, prompting speculation that talks were under way behind the scenes.

On Monday, Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis announced that the start of the trial would be delayed by 24 hours.

Although he gave no reason, US media reported that it was to give both sides an opportunity to reach a settlement.

On Tuesday morning, however, both sides appeared to be digging in for a lengthy trial.

Attorneys for Fox had repeatedly objected to the $1.6bn in damages sought by Colorado-based Dominion, characterising the figure as massively inflated.

The "real cost" of the case, Fox had argued, would be the "cherished" rights to freedom of speech and of the press enshrined in the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Dominion's lawsuit argued that the conservative network had sullied the electronic voting company's reputation by airing falsehoods about the 2020 vote being stolen from former President Trump.

The lawsuit said that the false claims were partly an effort to win over viewers who were angered by Fox's decision on election night to - correctly - declare that Mr Trump's then-challenger, Joe Biden, had won the crucial state of Arizona.

Two of the Fox executives responsible for the Arizona decision lost their jobs two months later.

Legal findings released ahead of the trial suggested that a number of Fox executives and journalists privately questioned and dismissed conspiracy claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen, but still put them on air.

Court documents show that Mr Murdoch referred to the claims about Dominion as "really crazy", but failed to take any action.

In one series of text messages, top-rated host Tucker Carlson said some of the claims were "insane". Another host, Sean Hannity, said privately he did not believe them "for one second".

Fox has said the words were taken out of context.

Ahead of the trial, Judge Davis ruled that the claims against Dominion had already been proven false, emphasising that the falsehoods were "crystal clear".

Despite the mammoth pay-out, some legal experts believe the settlement was overall a positive outcome for the network.

Syracuse University professor and First Amendment expert Roy Gutterman said: "Looking down the line at a six-week trial, this was going to be gruelling for everyone involved and likely embarrassing for Fox.

"But a verdict against Fox could have been even costlier, and had serious implications on subsequent rulings on the actual malice standard and the First Amendment itself."

Had the defamation trial gone ahead, jurors would have been tasked with determining whether Fox News acted with "actual malice" by broadcasting claims it knew to be false.

Civil litigation attorney Michelle Simpson Tuegel told the BBC that the settlement "speaks to the massive threat Fox saw from this litigation".

"The reputational harm of having executives, including chairman Rupert Murdoch, and hosts take the stand seems to have moved the parties towards a resolution," Ms Tuegel added.

Fox still faces a second, similar defamation lawsuit from another election technology firm, Smartmatic, which is seeking $2.7bn.

Dominion still has litigation pending against two conservative news networks, OAN and Newsmax.

The company has also sued Trump allies such as Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Mike Lindell.

BBC
 
The 19 July 2011 was the "most humble day" of Rupert Murdoch's life.

Until now, at least.

On that day in 2011, the world's most powerful media mogul was called before Parliament's culture and media committee as the phone hacking scandal engulfed his UK newspaper operations.

The final straw had been the revelation that the News of the World had listened in to the voicemails of the murdered schoolgirl Millie Dowler.

The horror of it still resonates (and the story of phone hacking is far from over).

Back then, Murdoch's damage limitation exercise was swift. He shut down the 168-year-old newspaper and apologised privately to the Dowler family.

The man who has had such a hold over Britain's media since he arrived in London in the late 1960s to buy the News of the World was forced into that humiliating one-liner.

"This is the most humble day of my life," he told MPs (with the theatre of the event heightened by his then wife Wendi Deng later launching herself at a protester who attacked her husband with a custard pie).

Now Murdoch has been forced into another humiliating climbdown, this time in relation to his US operations.

Yet again, it's the Murdoch empire's approach to truth that is in the spotlight.

Fox News argued it was fighting a court case against voting machine company Dominion in the interests of free speech, a US First Amendment right.

Instead, it appeared that the network relegated fact-based journalism for fiction in the wake of America's 2020 presidential election.

BBC
 
Tucker Carlson, the highest-rated cable TV host credited with setting the agenda for US conservatives, has left Fox News, the network announced.

In a statement, Fox News said it and Carlson had agreed to "part ways".

His last TV programme was Friday 21 April, the statement added. His primetime slot will now be hosted by a series of interim hosts until a permanent replacement is found.

The brief two-paragraph statement gave no reason for the abrupt decision.

The Los Angeles Times, citing unnamed people familiar with the situation, reports that the decision to fire Carlson came from the top, including Fox chairman Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan.

The 53-year-old was not just a popular presenter, but also a hugely influential one. His shows frequently set the agenda for conservatives and, by extension, the Republican party.

His programme offered a blend of populist conservative takes on issues ranging from immigration, crime, race, gender and sexuality, with "woke" ideology becoming a frequent target.

It made up four of the top 10 rated programmes on US cable TV, according to Nielsen data for the week 27 March to 2 April.

He was Fox News' top-rated host, with more than three million viewers tuning in on an average night.

While Carlson often publicly agreed with Donald Trump, whose politics have transformed the Republican party in recent years, he would occasionally diverge from the former president's political views.

Fox News' competitors were quick to capitalise on Carlson's departure.

One rival network, Newsmax, said it had successfully attracted viewers from Fox News in recent months and Carlson's departure would "only fuel that trend".

The announcement of Carlson's departure comes just days after Fox News settled a defamation lawsuit from the voting machine company Dominion over the cable network's coverage of the 2020 presidential election.

In the lawsuit, Dominion argued that its business was harmed by Fox spreading false claims that its machines were rigged against Mr Trump.

The case prompted disclosures of text messages that showed Carlson's private views often contrasted with his on-air output.

BBC
 
I guess Fox decided to cut their losses and run. They knew all the election stolen lies their team was peddling was going to land them in hot water and it did. Smartmatic has a similar lawsuit as Dominion and I expect anoother big out of court settlement. Tucker Carlson was the face of this narrative.

HE will be fine though. He will easily find a new home with so many other alt right media outlets.
 
Fox News has announced that long-time network personality Jesse Watters will replace ousted star Tucker Carlson.

The departure of Carlson, the most-watched cable news host in US history, has led to a downturn in the channel's primetime ratings.

Watters, 44, joined the network as a production assistant in 2002 and has anchored the 19:00 EDT (23:00 GMT) timeslot since the start of this year.

Fox News said in April that it was parting ways with Carlson.

The announcement came less than a week after the network settled a defamation lawsuit from the voting machine company Dominion over coverage of the 2020 presidential election.

The $787.5m (£619m) settlement narrowly averted a potentially embarrassing trial for Fox, and one at which Carlson was expected to be called to testify.

Carlson, 54, has since launched a new show he presents twice weekly on Twitter. Its first episode, on 6 June, has racked up nearly 120 million views.

Tucker Carlson Tonight drew upwards of three million daily viewers, regularly topping its cable competitors in the 20:00 hour.

Earlier this month, Fox sent Carlson a cease-and-desist letter, arguing that his new show was a breach of contract as he is still being paid by the network until the end of 2024.

Since his show was taken off air, a series of rotating hosts - including Watters - have anchored the timeslot, drawing roughly half of Carlson's audience.

Earlier in June, the network briefly lost its 120-week streak at the top of the primetime ratings to liberal rival MSNBC, although it has since reclaimed the spot.
 
The right wing media has a bunch of Rush Limbaugh, Carlson, Hannity wannabes so no shortage in demagogues to fill in these slots.
 
Defiant Trump turns up at $250m New York fraud trial to blast 'scam'
Former President Donald Trump has attacked a judge and prosecutor in a day of courtroom drama as he attended the opening of a fraud trial that could threaten his business empire.

On entering the room on Monday dressed in a blue suit, Mr Trump - who turned up voluntarily - looked ahead as he walked past the prosecutor who brought the case.

State's attorney general Letitia James, sitting in the front row, averted her gaze.

Their paths did not cross for the rest of opening statements as both sides laid out their case.

Mr Trump, the Trump Organization, several executives and two of his children - Donald Jr and Eric - are the defendants in the civil trial in New York Superior Court.

They are accused of fraud, falsification of business records, issuing false financial statements and conspiracy.

As the trial got under way, the former president occasionally glanced in the direction of Judge Arthur Engoron as he addressed the court.

Moments beforehand, in a tirade outside court that echoed across the chamber, Mr Trump had called the judge a "rogue adjudicator".

 
Back
Top