What's new

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s sweeping tariffs in 6-3 ruling - 'Taxing power lies with Congress'

Bhaag Viru Bhaag

T20I Star
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Runs
32,286

The majority found that the Constitution ‘very clearly’ gives Congress the power to impose taxes, which include tariffs. ‘The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch,’ Chief Justice John Roberts wrote​


US Supreme Court on Friday, struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs in a 6-3 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts. The bench upheld a lower court's decision that the Republican president's use of this 1977 law exceeded his authority.

The majority found that the Constitution “very clearly” gives Congress the power to impose taxes, which include tariffs. “The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, mentioned a report by Reuters.

Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

What the US Supreme Court said?​

According to a report by The Washington Post, the US apex court held that the US President did not possess the authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose extensive import duties on goods from nearly all US trading partners.

Trump had slapped sweeping tariffs on almost all of America's trading partners – invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The IEEPA is a 1977 law that allows the US President to regulate economic transactions during a declared national emergency.

 

The majority found that the Constitution ‘very clearly’ gives Congress the power to impose taxes, which include tariffs. ‘The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch,’ Chief Justice John Roberts wrote​


US Supreme Court on Friday, struck down President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs in a 6-3 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts. The bench upheld a lower court's decision that the Republican president's use of this 1977 law exceeded his authority.

The majority found that the Constitution “very clearly” gives Congress the power to impose taxes, which include tariffs. “The Framers did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, mentioned a report by Reuters.

Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

What the US Supreme Court said?​

According to a report by The Washington Post, the US apex court held that the US President did not possess the authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose extensive import duties on goods from nearly all US trading partners.

Trump had slapped sweeping tariffs on almost all of America's trading partners – invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The IEEPA is a 1977 law that allows the US President to regulate economic transactions during a declared national emergency.

So what happens, now? His ability to blackmail is gone...
 
The guy is flipping out, hilarious.
Someone should listen to his rant on how he can destroy trade a country but can’t charge money.

Absolute fool.
 
Man Costco , will always remember how you were the best under this administration!
 
The wannabe dictator described the SC judges as fools and lapdogs.

Maybe this rabid 🐕 has forgotten he appointed two of the judges who struck down these tariffs.

Anyway thanks for single handedly continuing to grow my gold portfolio Don.
 
Wings clipped. Enough of Tariffs. But Stock Market id reacting negatively. They don't know how to react to this news and dumping as usual.
 
Easily the worst, most childish, most amateurish, most retarded president in America's history.

It is like bowling 10 overs with a part-time bowler. Trump is that part-timer. :inti
 
Yes. Looming Iran war and all the SAAS companies shutting bricks because of AI taking over it. Very bad time to be in growth stocks and crypto.
I am loading up on some of the AI proof software stocks....most will do well..I am not sure about Intuit and Alassian...adobe too but lower risk just because AI is not known for accuracy or precision...
 
Trump brings in new 10% tariff as Supreme Court rejects his global import taxes

US President Donald Trump has imposed a new 10% global tariff to replace ones struck down by the Supreme Court, calling the ruling "terrible" and lambasting the justices who rejected his trade policy as "fools".

The president unveiled the plan shortly after the justices outlawed most of the global tariffs the White House announced last year.

In a 6-3 decision, the court held that the president had overstepped his powers.

The decision was a major victory for businesses and US states that had challenged the duties, opening the door to potentially billions of dollars in tariff refunds, while also injecting new uncertainty into the global trade landscape.

Speaking from the White House on Friday, Trump indicated that refunds would not come without a legal battle, saying he expected the matter to be tied up in court for years.

He also said he would turn to other laws to press ahead with his tariffs, which he has argued encourage investment and manufacturing in the US.

"We have alternatives - great alternatives and we'll be a lot stronger for it," he said.

The court battle was focused on import taxes that Trump unveiled last year on goods from nearly every country in the world.

The tariffs initially targeted Mexico, Canada and China, before expanding dramatically to dozens of trade partners on what the president billed as "Liberation Day" last April.

The White House had cited a 1977 law, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president power to "regulate" trade in response to an emergency.

But the measures sparked outcry at home and abroad from firms facing an abrupt rise in taxes on shipments entering the US, and fuelled worries that the levies would lead to higher prices.

Arguing before the court last year, lawyers for the challenging states and small businesses said that the law used by the president to impose the levies made no mention of the word "tariffs".

They said that Congress did not intend to hand off its power to tax or give the president an "open-ended power to junk" other existing trade deals and tariff rules.

In his opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative, sided with that view.

"When Congress has delegated its tariff powers, it has done so in explicit terms and subject to strict limits," he wrote.

"Had Congress intended to convey the distinct and extraordinary power to impose tariffs, it would have done so expressly, as it consistently has in other tariff statutes."

The decision to strike down the tariffs was joined by the court's three liberal justices, as well as two justices nominated by Trump: Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch.

Three conservative justices, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Samuel Alito, dissented.

At the White House, Trump said he was "absolutely ashamed" of the Republican appointees on the court who voted against his trade policy.

He said they were "just being fools and lap dogs" and were "very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution".

Shares on Wall Street rose after the announcement, with the S&P 500 closing up about 0.7%, as businesses across the US cautiously welcomed the ruling.

"I feel... like a thousand-pound weight has been lifted off my chest," said Beth Benike, the owner of Busy Baby products in Minnesota, which manufactures products in China.

Nik Holm, chief executive of Terry Precision Cycling, one of the small businesses involved in the case, called the ruling a "relief".

"Though it will be many months before our supply chain is back up and running as normal, we look forward to the government's refund of these improperly-collected duties," he said.

On Friday, Trump signed a proclamation imposing the new 10% tariff under a never-used law known as Section 122, which gives the power to put in place tariffs up to 15% for 150 days, at which point Congress must step in.

It will go into effect on 24 February.

The order states a variety of exemptions, including certain minerals, natural resources and fertilizers; some agricultural products like oranges and beef; pharmaceuticals; some electronics and certain vehicles.

For many of the categories of exempt goods, the order is broad and does not specifically say what items might be exempt.

Canada and Mexico will retain an exemption under a North American free trade pact, the USMCA, on tariffs covering a vast majority of goods.

A White House official said countries that struck trade deals with the US, including the UK, India and the EU, will now face the global 10% tariff under Section 122 rather than the tariff rate they had previously negotiated.

The Trump administration expects those countries to keep abiding by the concessions they had agreed to under the trade deals, the official added.

Analysts expect the White House to also consider other tools, such as Section 232 and Section 301, which allow import taxes to address national security risks and unfair trade practices.

Trump has previously used those tools for tariffs, including some announced last year on sectors such as steel, aluminium and cars. Those were untouched by the court ruling.

"Things have only gotten more complicated and more messy today," said Geoffrey Gertz, senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security in Washington.

Reaction by major trade partners was relatively muted.

"We take note of the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court and are analysing it carefully," European Commission spokesman Olof Gill wrote on social media.

 
Back
Top