What's new

[VIDEO] U-19 cricketer Ahmed Shafiq quits cricket

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,132
So another cricketer has decided he can not progress any further due to the new domestic system.

Ahmed Shafiq:

Capture.JPG

<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 100%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/hlv98a" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
 
Very unfortunate. Another talent lost due to lack of money and opportunity.
 
He hasn’t played FC/List A/T20 cricket even before the new system. He wasn’t good enough for 16 teams, how the heck is good enough for 6 teams :)))
 
There should be an u23 tournament, many players quit cricket after the u19 level because of lack of opportunities. Not everyone will be good at that age but there are chances of developing with the passage of time and with experience of playing with and against better players.
 
Was he any good?

If not, then I'm afraid he should have seen it coming.
 
Lol, the new PTI and IK regional system is working. Its filtering out the garbage. Anyone who decides and realizes in a merit system, he is not good enough to progress further, wise decision to move on and do other things.
 
There should be an u23 tournament, many players quit cricket after the u19 level because of lack of opportunities. Not everyone will be good at that age but there are chances of developing with the passage of time and with experience of playing with and against better players.

This is a good point and the PCB is working towards this
 
Btw, what are these players going to do if they decide to quit cricket? Do they have better opportunities outside the game?
 
Was he any good?

If not, then I'm afraid he should have seen it coming.

I suppose the question is, was the U-19 talent pool of all teenagers all over Pakistan that bad in 2016 that one of the top 11 can’t find a place?
 
Lol, the new PTI and IK regional system is working. Its filtering out the garbage. Anyone who decides and realizes in a merit system, he is not good enough to progress further, wise decision to move on and do other things.

Agreed. A few good cricketers might fall through the cracks but a strong city cricket association system will act as the safety net.

If these cricketers don’t think their good enough to even make a city cricket association, or believe it’s below their level, then there needs to be an attitude readjustment. And setting a precedent by kicking non-hardworkers out is exactly how future attitudes will change.
 
I suppose the question is, was the U-19 talent pool of all teenagers all over Pakistan that bad in 2016 that one of the top 11 can’t find a place?

That is common occurrence if I'm not wrong.. very few(4-5) from U-19 actually make it..
 
Was he any good?

If not, then I'm afraid he should have seen it coming.

Well he was good enough to play for Pakistan U19, without nepotism. He feels he had more of a chance to get a go in the old system as opposed to the new system with 6 teams- which is mainly filled up of TTFs and domestic veterans.
 
I haven't seen this lad play so I don't know what his potential was.

This new system will only work if the people making the decisions on who to include are smart, strategic and unbiased. From what I remember Imran Farhat made one of the teams? That to me is a massive red flag.
 
That is common occurrence if I'm not wrong.. very few(4-5) from U-19 actually make it..

Very few make it to the Pakistan team but surely there was enough space in domestics in the previous system (before 6 regions)?

It only highlights the need further for the 6-team system with a further 6-team second XI and then 20-30 city teams where these cricketers could have been employed.
 
Last edited:
I haven't seen this lad play so I don't know what his potential was.

This new system will only work if the people making the decisions on who to include are smart, strategic and unbiased. From what I remember Imran Farhat made one of the teams? That to me is a massive red flag.

Imran Farhat, Umar Gul, Kamran Akmal represented Pakistan internationally. They will still be better than your average domestic cricketer, even if they have no future with the Pakistani team but their presence will be helpful for inexperienced, raw, young domestic cricketers. You can't have completely raw inexperienced cricketers, needs to be a good blend of youth and experience
 
I suppose the question is, was the U-19 talent pool of all teenagers all over Pakistan that bad in 2016 that one of the top 11 can’t find a place?

If you are interested, Suleman Shafat(or Shafqat) and Zaid Alam form the 2016 u19 batch are part of Central Punjab and Northern (albeit 2nd XI)
 
If you are interested, Suleman Shafat(or Shafqat) and Zaid Alam form the 2016 u19 batch are part of Central Punjab and Northern (albeit 2nd XI)

This suleman shafqat has links. What i have seen of him he looked like a club cricketer. Pathetic.
 
If you are interested, Suleman Shafat(or Shafqat) and Zaid Alam form the 2016 u19 batch are part of Central Punjab and Northern (albeit 2nd XI)

Well it was more of a different question. That batch had Hasan Mohsin, Saif Badar, Shadab Khan, and Zeeshan Malik. Umair Masood was the wicket keeper.

So the batch was quite decent. The real question is, could he have been that bad that he didn’t get a departmental contract?

(Also, Zaid Alam came later. Has a hundred from Pakistan u-19’s tour in 2018 to Australia, a good talent).
 
Btw, what are these players going to do if they decide to quit cricket? Do they have better opportunities outside the game?

Its better to concentrate on studies or some other profession at 19 rather than after wasting another 6=7 years if you are not good enough a cricketer.
 
Our fans have deluded themselves into thinking that having less number of teams is the magic key to building a high performance environment that will make Pakistan an elite team in the future.

Pakistan team is in such dire straits and our fans are in such a miserable situation that you can sell them any dummy and they will run with it.

We have blindly copy pasted the Australian model without thinking it through and without realizing that it is not suitable or sustainable in a country with 200m+ people with the second largest pool of cricketers in the country.

If this dumb theory of less teams = higher quality was true, India would not have had 38 FC sides and New Zealand would not have 6 teams for 5 million people.

So if this dumb theory would work, India would become invincible if they have 9 FC teams like the 9 IPL franchises. In a country of 1.3 billion people, with only 9 FC teams, only the elite of the elite will make it to FC cricket.

Heck, if they only have 2 teams, then every single player will be of the quality of Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma and Bumrah, and India will never lose a game of cricket again.

New Zealand have less people than Karachi and Lahore put together and cricket is not even their most popular sport, but yet they have 6 FC teams.

So perhaps New Zealand should also have only 2 FC teams and they would become the strongest team in the world.

This 6 team drama will never work in Pakistan. It is simply not sustainable. It can only work in theory where the regions do not pick TTFs and only go for young players who could potentially excel in international cricket.

However, practically, that is not possible because regions will always pick domestic bullies and proven performers because they need to win matches as well and not just look at the interests of the national team.

That is why in every domestic system, you will find players who have failed at the international level or are not good enough for international level but are still picked because they do well in domestic.

So what has this lead to? Young cricketers in Pakistan are moving away from the game because they will never get a fair shot in this ridiculous system that is completely incompatible with our population.

It is easy for some to say now that good riddance, he was not good enough so he ran away etc., but this is only the beginning. Eventually, some genuinely talented players will also get filtered out because there are not enough spots (even with the second teams) and there are too many domestic bullies who are hogging the spots.

As a result, you will find young players moving away from the game or trying to become PSL specialists and use that route to get into the Pakistan side, which is a recipe for disaster because cricket skills are and always will be honed in FC cricket.

We will then keep picking and hyping players with no FC experience like Naseem or Rauf, and then they will fail with flying colors like Naseem did against England after all the big talk and expectations, and then our fans will make excuses and celebrated the “he bowled a great delivery to Joe Root” trophy after 3 wickets in 3 Tests at an average of 70+.

This model is not sustainable and I can guarantee that PCB will take a U-turn on it in the near future. They already know that it is a blunder but they cannot back-track immediately out of shame and because of their bloated egos.

In the future, we will either see a return of departmental cricket or the number of teams will be increased to 12-15.

Anyone who thinks this current model is a sustainable one and will help Pakistan become a more competitive, strong side in all formats is in for a brutal reality-check and Pakistani fans love reality-checks.
 
Our fans have deluded themselves into thinking that having less number of teams is the magic key to building a high performance environment that will make Pakistan an elite team in the future.

Pakistan team is in such dire straits and our fans are in such a miserable situation that you can sell them any dummy and they will run with it.

We have blindly copy pasted the Australian model without thinking it through and without realizing that it is not suitable or sustainable in a country with 200m+ people with the second largest pool of cricketers in the country.

If this dumb theory of less teams = higher quality was true, India would not have had 38 FC sides and New Zealand would not have 6 teams for 5 million people.

So if this dumb theory would work, India would become invincible if they have 9 FC teams like the 9 IPL franchises. In a country of 1.3 billion people, with only 9 FC teams, only the elite of the elite will make it to FC cricket.

Heck, if they only have 2 teams, then every single player will be of the quality of Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma and Bumrah, and India will never lose a game of cricket again.

New Zealand have less people than Karachi and Lahore put together and cricket is not even their most popular sport, but yet they have 6 FC teams.

So perhaps New Zealand should also have only 2 FC teams and they would become the strongest team in the world.

This 6 team drama will never work in Pakistan. It is simply not sustainable. It can only work in theory where the regions do not pick TTFs and only go for young players who could potentially excel in international cricket.

However, practically, that is not possible because regions will always pick domestic bullies and proven performers because they need to win matches as well and not just look at the interests of the national team.

That is why in every domestic system, you will find players who have failed at the international level or are not good enough for international level but are still picked because they do well in domestic.

So what has this lead to? Young cricketers in Pakistan are moving away from the game because they will never get a fair shot in this ridiculous system that is completely incompatible with our population.

It is easy for some to say now that good riddance, he was not good enough so he ran away etc., but this is only the beginning. Eventually, some genuinely talented players will also get filtered out because there are not enough spots (even with the second teams) and there are too many domestic bullies who are hogging the spots.

As a result, you will find young players moving away from the game or trying to become PSL specialists and use that route to get into the Pakistan side, which is a recipe for disaster because cricket skills are and always will be honed in FC cricket.

We will then keep picking and hyping players with no FC experience like Naseem or Rauf, and then they will fail with flying colors like Naseem did against England after all the big talk and expectations, and then our fans will make excuses and celebrated the “he bowled a great delivery to Joe Root” trophy after 3 wickets in 3 Tests at an average of 70+.

This model is not sustainable and I can guarantee that PCB will take a U-turn on it in the near future. They already know that it is a blunder but they cannot back-track immediately out of shame and because of their bloated egos.

In the future, we will either see a return of departmental cricket or the number of teams will be increased to 12-15.

Anyone who thinks this current model is a sustainable one and will help Pakistan become a more competitive, strong side in all formats is in for a brutal reality-check and Pakistani fans love reality-checks.

India has 6 times the population of Pakistan. If you do your math calculation properly then the ratio is similar. The 9 team added by Lodha committee make up 1% of Indian population. They did pretty well with 29 teams despite being such a populous country.
 
India has 6 times the population of Pakistan. If you do your math calculation properly then the ratio is similar. The 9 team added by Lodha committee make up 1% of Indian population. They did pretty well with 29 teams despite being such a populous country.

It is not about math only. If we use math only then how many teams should New Zealand and England have?

The point is that 6 teams are nowhere near enough for a huge country (population wise like Pakistan). Of course there is no magic number that you can derive with calculations, but the point is that this 6 team drama will fizzle out and not produce the results that our fans desperately hope.
 
Our fans have deluded themselves into thinking that having less number of teams is the magic key to building a high performance environment that will make Pakistan an elite team in the future.

Pakistan team is in such dire straits and our fans are in such a miserable situation that you can sell them any dummy and they will run with it.

We have blindly copy pasted the Australian model without thinking it through and without realizing that it is not suitable or sustainable in a country with 200m+ people with the second largest pool of cricketers in the country.

If this dumb theory of less teams = higher quality was true, India would not have had 38 FC sides and New Zealand would not have 6 teams for 5 million people.

So if this dumb theory would work, India would become invincible if they have 9 FC teams like the 9 IPL franchises. In a country of 1.3 billion people, with only 9 FC teams, only the elite of the elite will make it to FC cricket.

Heck, if they only have 2 teams, then every single player will be of the quality of Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma and Bumrah, and India will never lose a game of cricket again.

New Zealand have less people than Karachi and Lahore put together and cricket is not even their most popular sport, but yet they have 6 FC teams.

So perhaps New Zealand should also have only 2 FC teams and they would become the strongest team in the world.

This 6 team drama will never work in Pakistan. It is simply not sustainable. It can only work in theory where the regions do not pick TTFs and only go for young players who could potentially excel in international cricket.

However, practically, that is not possible because regions will always pick domestic bullies and proven performers because they need to win matches as well and not just look at the interests of the national team.

That is why in every domestic system, you will find players who have failed at the international level or are not good enough for international level but are still picked because they do well in domestic.

So what has this lead to? Young cricketers in Pakistan are moving away from the game because they will never get a fair shot in this ridiculous system that is completely incompatible with our population.

It is easy for some to say now that good riddance, he was not good enough so he ran away etc., but this is only the beginning. Eventually, some genuinely talented players will also get filtered out because there are not enough spots (even with the second teams) and there are too many domestic bullies who are hogging the spots.

As a result, you will find young players moving away from the game or trying to become PSL specialists and use that route to get into the Pakistan side, which is a recipe for disaster because cricket skills are and always will be honed in FC cricket.

We will then keep picking and hyping players with no FC experience like Naseem or Rauf, and then they will fail with flying colors like Naseem did against England after all the big talk and expectations, and then our fans will make excuses and celebrated the “he bowled a great delivery to Joe Root” trophy after 3 wickets in 3 Tests at an average of 70+.

This model is not sustainable and I can guarantee that PCB will take a U-turn on it in the near future. They already know that it is a blunder but they cannot back-track immediately out of shame and because of their bloated egos.

In the future, we will either see a return of departmental cricket or the number of teams will be increased to 12-15.

Anyone who thinks this current model is a sustainable one and will help Pakistan become a more competitive, strong side in all formats is in for a brutal reality-check and Pakistani fans love reality-checks.

Actually this is how the model is conceptualized to work

6 primary region teams, 6 second eleven grade 2 region teams below that, each region will have its various city teams below that and the PCB is working on setting up 90 city associations i.e. that means 90 teams, these cities will have various clubs, schools and universities which will feed to it.

Lets assume that a primary regional team has 15 players, 5 coaches, 1 manager, 3 selectors and a CEO i.e. 25 people x 6 teams, 150 people in the primary tier, in the second tier 150 people in the second eleven tier, then you have 90 city associations i.e. 2,250 people in the cities, it is impossible to count how many players, officials will be involved in club, school and university cricket. Based on my calculation, opportunities will be created for approximately 2,550 players and officials. This is more than sufficient for a country like Pakistan.

Only difference is that selection in terms of players and coaches in the first tier is going to be very competitive and the players who miss out and have to play in the second tier or for the cities will have to work very hard to break through, they have to be extraordinarily gifted and if they don't have the right attitude, work ethic they will struggle and remain in the bottom tiers or they will leave the game for good.
 
It is not about math only. If we use math only then how many teams should New Zealand and England have?

The point is that 6 teams are nowhere near enough for a huge country (population wise like Pakistan). Of course there is no magic number that you can derive with calculations, but the point is that this 6 team drama will fizzle out and not produce the results that our fans desperately hope.

How about we refer to it as 12 team drama rather than 6 team drama? Secondly, why will more competitive domestic cricket not foster more competitive cricketers?

(Let’s assume I agree some talented youngsters will not enter the system at all, which itself is debatable.)
 
Actually this is how the model is conceptualized to work

6 primary region teams, 6 second eleven grade 2 region teams below that, each region will have its various city teams below that and the PCB is working on setting up 90 city associations i.e. that means 90 teams, these cities will have various clubs, schools and universities which will feed to it.

Lets assume that a primary regional team has 15 players, 5 coaches, 1 manager, 3 selectors and a CEO i.e. 25 people x 6 teams, 150 people in the primary tier, in the second tier 150 people in the second eleven tier, then you have 90 city associations i.e. 2,250 people in the cities, it is impossible to count how many players, officials will be involved in club, school and university cricket. Based on my calculation, opportunities will be created for approximately 2,550 players and officials. This is more than sufficient for a country like Pakistan.

Only difference is that selection in terms of players and coaches in the first tier is going to be very competitive and the players who miss out and have to play in the second tier or for the cities will have to work very hard to break through, they have to be extraordinarily gifted and if they don't have the right attitude, work ethic they will struggle and remain in the bottom tiers or they will leave the game for good.

Precisely.
 
How about we refer to it as 12 team drama rather than 6 team drama? Secondly, why will more competitive domestic cricket not foster more competitive cricketers?

(Let’s assume I agree some talented youngsters will not enter the system at all, which itself is debatable.)

Second XIs are not the same as having different teams. My view is that we need around 12-15 different teams and I think that is where we will end up once PCB swallows it’s pride.
 
Actually this is how the model is conceptualized to work

6 primary region teams, 6 second eleven grade 2 region teams below that, each region will have its various city teams below that and the PCB is working on setting up 90 city associations i.e. that means 90 teams, these cities will have various clubs, schools and universities which will feed to it.

Lets assume that a primary regional team has 15 players, 5 coaches, 1 manager, 3 selectors and a CEO i.e. 25 people x 6 teams, 150 people in the primary tier, in the second tier 150 people in the second eleven tier, then you have 90 city associations i.e. 2,250 people in the cities, it is impossible to count how many players, officials will be involved in club, school and university cricket. Based on my calculation, opportunities will be created for approximately 2,550 players and officials. This is more than sufficient for a country like Pakistan.

Only difference is that selection in terms of players and coaches in the first tier is going to be very competitive and the players who miss out and have to play in the second tier or for the cities will have to work very hard to break through, they have to be extraordinarily gifted and if they don't have the right attitude, work ethic they will struggle and remain in the bottom tiers or they will leave the game for good.

All that is well and good, but 6 regional teams are remotely not enough to cater to our population because most of the spots will always be hogged by domestic performers who don’t have anything to give in international cricket.

So players that come through the ranks in school/university cricket, club cricket and other junior levels etc. will be filtered out by the time they reach regional cricket because there aren’t enough available spots.

6 regional teams can only cater to the second biggest cricket population in the world if and only if the regions agree that domestic bullies and TTFs (players who will never be picked by Pakistan again) will not be played and their spots will be given to young players.

That of course cannot happen.
 
Secondly, why will more competitive domestic cricket not foster more competitive cricketers?

Because domestic bullies and international TTFs will continue to hog spots. This model can only work if such players are weeded out of the system, but that cannot happen because these players perform in domestic cricket and regions want to win as well.

And if less teams = more competitive cricket worked, other boards would be following our lead as well.
 
Second XIs are not the same as having different teams. My view is that we need around 12-15 different teams and I think that is where we will end up once PCB swallows it’s pride.

Why though? Your argument is premised on the assumption of having talent fall through the cracks. In your model you have 12*11 players all playing first class and I have 12*11 players as well. No one is falling through the cracks in the system. At least not more than in your model.

You put your higher limit at 15 teams. I’ll do you one better - 8 domestic teams with first and second XIs.

That’s 16, so 11 players extra who you’re really concerned about.

Finally, I thought you had no hope in the future of Pakistani youngsters? Why dilute the quality of cricket for our top 100 cricketers just to accommodate another overrated lad? If that lad is that good, he can shine his way through the city cricket system, and get into the regional second XI!
 
All that is well and good, but 6 regional teams are remotely not enough to cater to our population because most of the spots will always be hogged by domestic performers who don’t have anything to give in international cricket.

So players that come through the ranks in school/university cricket, club cricket and other junior levels etc. will be filtered out by the time they reach regional cricket because there aren’t enough available spots.

6 regional teams can only cater to the second biggest cricket population in the world if and only if the regions agree that domestic bullies and TTFs (players who will never be picked by Pakistan again) will not be played and their spots will be given to young players.

That of course cannot happen.

Agreed! 6 isn’t enough. But like you yourself said, 12 is.

Because domestic bullies and international TTFs will continue to hog spots. This model can only work if such players are weeded out of the system, but that cannot happen because these players perform in domestic cricket and regions want to win as well.

And if less teams = more competitive cricket worked, other boards would be following our lead as well.

Then isn’t it good that Wasim Khan and Ehsan Mani are purging coaches who have backed oldies (Ijaz Ahmed Jr), begun offering “mentor” and coaching roles to senior players across the domestic circuit (Aizaz Cheema, Umar Gul) to phase them out, and are emphasizing a youngster first policy while reviewing coaches?

If you take a look at the second XI squads, I’m sure you’ll be pleasantly surprised. There’s a lot of good youngsters in there, and not too many TTFs and domestic bullies. Captaincy roles aside, since those have been provided to seniors for the most part whose job is to groom the younger players.
 
Why though? Your argument is premised on the assumption of having talent fall through the cracks. In your model you have 12*11 players all playing first class and I have 12*11 players as well. No one is falling through the cracks in the system. At least not more than in your model.

You put your higher limit at 15 teams. I’ll do you one better - 8 domestic teams with first and second XIs.

That’s 16, so 11 players extra who you’re really concerned about.

Finally, I thought you had no hope in the future of Pakistani youngsters? Why dilute the quality of cricket for our top 100 cricketers just to accommodate another overrated lad? If that lad is that good, he can shine his way through the city cricket system, and get into the regional second XI!

Because these second XIs are not going to function the way people here think. A lot of players are going to perform in second XIs and not make the jump to the first XI because there is no room.

Speaking of dilution, I do not believe this nonsense that number of teams has anything to do with quality of cricket.

Do you think India will become unbeatable if they decide to follow PCB and only have 6 teams?

If you have 6 teams for 1.3B people, then in theory, every domestic player who would break through should be ATG material like Kohli and Rohit. However, realistically, that will not happen.

PCB thinks they have cracked the code, but all they have done is steal livelihood from people and ruined lives.

I am hope I am alive when PCB takes a shameless U-turn on this because all this drama will achieve is to contribute to unemployment.

Wasim Khan says PCB is not a job-proving organization, but he is earning a fortune for taking dumb decisions, and he has given high paying fancy jobs to useless folks like Saqlain and Bradburn who have failed in their previous capacities.

They will achieve nothing as director to director to director to high performance international player development bla bla nonsense except make a fortune, while professional cricketers have been rendered jobless.
 
Agreed! 6 isn’t enough. But like you yourself said, 12 is.



Then isn’t it good that Wasim Khan and Ehsan Mani are purging coaches who have backed oldies (Ijaz Ahmed Jr), begun offering “mentor” and coaching roles to senior players across the domestic circuit (Aizaz Cheema, Umar Gul) to phase them out, and are emphasizing a youngster first policy while reviewing coaches?

If you take a look at the second XI squads, I’m sure you’ll be pleasantly surprised. There’s a lot of good youngsters in there, and not too many TTFs and domestic bullies. Captaincy roles aside, since those have been provided to seniors for the most part whose job is to groom the younger players.

Like I said in my previous post, the second XIs are not going to work like people think. It is not going to be as simple as performing in second XI and then get promoting to the first XI.

It is going to be far more complicated than that with added layers of complexity.

12 different teams will work much better than 6 first and 6 second teams.
 
Cricket is dying a slow death in Pakistan.

Too many bits and pieces ones falling away which to some comes as a shock.

PCB is an organisation to produce professional athletes not to provide hundreds or thousands of people jobs and paying them salaries as that seems to have been a normal for the past 30-40 years.

Teams and the PCB just need to focus on getting the over 30's out of the first playing teams and shift their focus to selecting deserving ones below that age into the first teams and showcasing if their worth the investment.

There is still a lot more that needs to change with this system.
 
Cricket is dying a slow death in Pakistan.

Too many bits and pieces ones falling away which to some comes as a shock.

PCB is an organisation to produce professional athletes not to provide hundreds or thousands of people jobs and paying them salaries as that seems to have been a normal for the past 30-40 years.

Teams and the PCB just need to focus on getting the over 30's out of the first playing teams and shift their focus to selecting deserving ones below that age into the first teams and showcasing if their worth the investment.

There is still a lot more that needs to change with this system.

It's already starting to happen but obvs it's not an over day thing but it's a start
 
Like I said in my previous post, the second XIs are not going to work like people think. It is not going to be as simple as performing in second XI and then get promoting to the first XI.

It is going to be far more complicated than that with added layers of complexity.

12 different teams will work much better than 6 first and 6 second teams.

I am not sure there is currently enough quality available to fill in 12 teams and have a competitive tournament especially when you take into account international players will almost never be available for full seasons. If we take out the national players from the domestic teams, the available lot which will also require fill in from 2nd xi can only be said as decently competitive. If there is a proper grass root structure in place and talent is overflowing through then I think one can argue for increasing the no of teams.

Yes many people play cricket in Pakistan but not enough quality players are developed or come to the top domestic level which nullifies the population aspect. That was the problem with the previous structure where a lot of mediocre players didnt offer much competition and thus the development of young players wasnt great.

Even in the current setup I think promotion to main team hasnt been too difficult for players who performed well like Zeeshan Ashraf (Was able to get even PSL contract which shows 2nd xi performances are recognized), Abdullah Shafique who got opportunity for main team at the end of same season and now are very much likely to represent their respective teams across the formats. Irfan Niazi and few others are also examples of young players getting the contracts by performing well at U19 level and in some matches for 2nd XI as well. At the same time some players from second xi did get matches for first xi during the last season. Some did miss out as well like Mohammad Imran (23 year old pacer) who was outstanding in 2nd XI national T20 cup for Southern Punjab.

Just my view, I understand the argument for more teams as well.
 
Back
Top