The_Odd_One
ODI Debutant
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2015
- Runs
- 8,950
I have seen plenty of tests in which Akram could not take any top order wickets and he took a lot of lower order wickets. That is why I rate McGrath, Ambrose, and Steyn as better tests bowlers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have seen plenty of tests in which Akram could not take any top order wickets and he took a lot of lower order wickets. That is why I rate McGrath, Ambrose, and Steyn as better tests bowlers.
Lol. I love how non sub-continental players are usually less talented and just hard workers.
I have seen plenty of tests in which Akram could not take any top order wickets and he took a lot of lower order wickets. That is why I rate McGrath, Ambrose, and Steyn as better tests bowlers.
It's a consistent theme in PP. There is another thread going about Sanga and Amla. Take a look at how much underrated Amla, AB etc are even for period starting from 2010. Performance is not important to rate players in PP. It's talent and only SC players have copyright on talent.
It's been a case with posters underrating SA players here on PP.
Amla in tests or even Steyn who gets compared to Jimmy Anderson when there is a gulf of difference between the two in tests and not that Jimmy is better than Steyn in other formats.
AB avgs 60+ in World Cups and is considered a failure in WC's lol as per high standards set for him.
Name one inning that AB played against a non-minnow team in WC that brought SA any success in world cups and please do not mention WI.
AB is rightly criticized for lack of world cup performances. Not his fault though that rain ruined his chance in the semi-final of 2015 WC.
Pollock vs Wasim is a better comparision.
They are comparable. Similar records and handy bats.There you go.. This should lighten up fire in some part of the world for sure.
IMO, Pollock was a better batsmen of the two.
One player alone can't win you games. It's a team effort that wins you game.
AB has performed in World Cups as well as he could but the reason they haven't win is because as a unit they have failed to seize big moments and hence lost in crucial juncture.One player doesn't win you unless the whole team stood up as unit( the best example was semis vs NZ).
If you talk about a win , then even a 53(39) vs India in 11 WC gave his team the momentum required and they won the game but clearly that was a case when his team performed as unit( Kallis, Amla, Steyn, Peterson all did well ) and seized the big moment and chased down the target.
AB has many superior knocks to that ( 53 vs Ind was just a good knock at max) but in those games the team effort wasn't there and henceforth the main reason for SA failure in WC.
Blame AB for his leadership and man management but as a player he is too good to be undermined.
Anyways, we already had a lot of discussion on these points in recent times and this thread is not about it. So I have no problems if someone still agree to disagree on it.
His 92 against Australia in 2007 was terrific too.So, all you could come up with was 53(39)?
AB's true great WC inning was the semi-final of 2015 WC which was ruined by rain. Other than that, he really does not have much to show on his WC resume.
He is the most talented batsman I have ever watched, no disagreement there but he clearly lacks memorable world cup performances.
So, all you could come up with was 53(39)?
AB's true great WC inning was the semi-final of 2015 WC which was ruined by rain. Other than that, he really does not have much to show on his WC resume.
He is the most talented batsman I have ever watched, no disagreement there but he clearly lacks memorable world cup performances.
I am not too sure of a match winning inning being necessarily the one that results in win. This is because it's the team effort that wins you game and not one player.I have already said it once.
As for his best knock, the one vs Australia in 07 WC and vs NZ in semis 15 were his best one.Against Aus, When he got run out( something which is a norm in WCs for him) , the score was 160-1 in 20 overs and SA were well in game with a chance considering they chased down 436 an year back. Clearly, it was not what you call easy runs when team is assured to lose.
Against Pak in 15 WC, he did a Misbah but not the one of Mohali but the one of Johannesburg.
Against Australia, he did not even take his team close to that total. It cannot be regarded as a memorable world cup knock.
They are comparable. Similar records and handy bats.
Wasim Akram was better than Dale Steyn by lightyears.
In both formats.
Wasim Akram was so dominant and fierce a fast bowler in the limited overs format that no fast bowler in the history of the game approaches him in terms of talent, variation, performance, ability or record.
In Test matches, Dale Steyn is about 20% inferior, on average.
Wasim bhai had more variety, more control, greater performance, better records, poorer fieldsmen dropping catches one after the other while Dale Steyn or other Saffies had some of the best fielding units in the world helping them boost their averages and other stats in bowling friendly saffer conditions.
On top of that, there are numerous obvious cases some of which you can find videos of even today where Wasim bhai and Team Pakistan was blatantly robbed of Test victories abroad, two prominent cases being the Hobart test where Justin Langer was caught behind and the Antigue Test where Jimmy Adams was caught behind, but the umpires either cheated or made terrible decisions that cost Pakistan the games, and Wasim bhai's stats also suffered accordingly.
In both ODIs and Tests, there are dozens of such examples where let alone umpires, the nonstriker had a hard time figuring out the late swing or deviation or some other mesmerizing variation of his delivery that Wasim bhai would come up with.
Stats wise, Wasim Bhai is at least 20% better than Steyn in Tests. No contest in ODIs as Wasim Bhai is the best ever ODI bowler by quite some margin.
FYI, Wasim Bhai averages 24.28 despite all those dropped catches, denied LBWs, denied caught behinds, conflicts in the dressing room and all that - against Top 8 sides, away from home.
243 wickets, at 24.28, with 16 5Ws, in 58 Matches, 103 innings. Econ rate of 2.59, 11 MoM, 5MoS.
Against the Top 8 sides, away from home, Dale Steyn despite benefitting from the superior Saffer fielding unit and emergence of much poorer batting techniques and temperament around the world due to T20 influence, averages 26.09.
147 wickets, at 26.09 with 9 5Ws, in 33 Matches, 59 Innings. Econ rate of 3.36, 3 MoM, 1MoS
Even in his supposedly favoured format of Test cricket, Dale Steyn still comes up short by a significant margin by all available indicators. In terms of stats. And in terms of ability, talent, imposing presence, ability to toy with the best and most technically correct and/or aesthetically pleasing batsmen.
Wasim Bhai wins it comfortably in all formats, Statistically, in terms of ability, control, match winning performance, variation, records, and you name it.
Wasim Akram was better than Dale Steyn by lightyears.
In both formats.
Wasim Akram was so dominant and fierce a fast bowler in the limited overs format that no fast bowler in the history of the game approaches him in terms of talent, variation, performance, ability or record.
In Test matches, Dale Steyn is about 20% inferior, on average.
Wasim bhai had more variety, more control, greater performance, better records, poorer fieldsmen dropping catches one after the other while Dale Steyn or other Saffies had some of the best fielding units in the world helping them boost their averages and other stats in bowling friendly saffer conditions.
On top of that, there are numerous obvious cases some of which you can find videos of even today where Wasim bhai and Team Pakistan was blatantly robbed of Test victories abroad, two prominent cases being the Hobart test where Justin Langer was caught behind and the Antigue Test where Jimmy Adams was caught behind, but the umpires either cheated or made terrible decisions that cost Pakistan the games, and Wasim bhai's stats also suffered accordingly.
In both ODIs and Tests, there are dozens of such examples where let alone umpires, the nonstriker had a hard time figuring out the late swing or deviation or some other mesmerizing variation of his delivery that Wasim bhai would come up with.
Stats wise, Wasim Bhai is at least 20% better than Steyn in Tests. No contest in ODIs as Wasim Bhai is the best ever ODI bowler by quite some margin.
FYI, Wasim Bhai averages 24.28 despite all those dropped catches, denied LBWs, denied caught behinds, conflicts in the dressing room and all that - against Top 8 sides, away from home.
243 wickets, at 24.28, with 16 5Ws, in 58 Matches, 103 innings. Econ rate of 2.59, 11 MoM, 5MoS.
Against the Top 8 sides, away from home, Dale Steyn despite benefitting from the superior Saffer fielding unit and emergence of much poorer batting techniques and temperament around the world due to T20 influence, averages 26.09.
147 wickets, at 26.09 with 9 5Ws, in 33 Matches, 59 Innings. Econ rate of 3.36, 3 MoM, 1MoS
Even in his supposedly favoured format of Test cricket, Dale Steyn still comes up short by a significant margin by all available indicators. In terms of stats. And in terms of ability, talent, imposing presence, ability to toy with the best and most technically correct and/or aesthetically pleasing batsmen.
Wasim Bhai wins it comfortably in all formats, Statistically, in terms of ability, control, match winning performance, variation, records, and you name it.

)Wasim Akram in his pomp was poetry in motion.
Absolutely lethal with both new and the old ball and I have no doubt that had he been a South African, English or Australian player, especially in this era, he would have broken every single bowling record and be held as an undisputed all time great.
By this I mean that with the right diet and fitness/exercise regime and an overall professional outlook combined with players who can actually catch a ball, Akram would have truly fulfilled his undoubted talent and ability with the ball. I also think he would have achieved more with the bat.
Steyn at his peak is yet to master a yorker or even reverse swing. Without these things bowler is incomplete.
Both are legends but Wasim was a complete bowler. Not to forget Steyn played most of his career on bowler friendly wickets of SA.
Akram in his prime would have Kohli every day of the week and twice on sundays. That's how great he was, especially the swing at 140s was just lethal
In that case he should have been averaging below 10 shouldn't he? Be objective bro, don't go overboard. Don't throw one liners which you can't back up. If your sole intention is to trigger a response then you are doing a good job I suppose and by all means please carry on.
Kohli can't play in swing. And Akram was great at it. Amir took Kohli out on in swing and an lbw shouts which didnt go in favor in t20 and so did Junaid Khan. It wasn't something irrational, as you made it look like. Akram was the greatest bowler, and Kohli is known as modern great, so Akram with tools enough to make modern day batsman suffer, is enough to show you that he is greatest!
Steyn has gotten reverse swing consistently with all the cameras around. In bottle cap era, he would have been unplayable with his reverse.
There was no such thing as a 'bottle cap era', unless you are talking about one specific county match, which would be ludicrous to extrapolate from.
In recent years, SA have been caught twice iirc.
That was just to refer to era when you can do whatever you wanted with the ball.
If you allow the same freedom to Steyn, he will run riots with the old ball. We have seen enough evidence of that. Steyn can't reverse that ball is simply not true.