GLORY OF '92
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2007
- Runs
- 13,007
With our openers and pace bowlers scraping the barrel I can see we are going to get humiliated like we never have before. Worse than our previous 3 tours.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nothing new. Every team except south africa and england lately have been demolished by australia in australia.
They lost 0-5 in last Ashes down under.
Except SA no one has done well in AUS flat wickets or not at least we drew 2 matches.
We have done more than just drawing in australia especially in the 2003-2004 and 2008 tour of australia. That was australia's best era in cricket.
All depends on our batting.
We should be able to do better on those flat wickets (MCG, SCG).
But this is Pakistan the most unpredictable side in the world.
Aussies are also capable of producing non-flat wickets and their batsmen (although mediocre) will be able to bat better on those pitches than our band of no-hopers.
Aus is as ordinary as it gets if ball moves sideways. Even Pakistan may be able to out bat Aus. Main issue may be lack of good pacers with Pakistan here.
The openers are fine. And I say that as someone who wanted Salman Butt to tour.
The problems are basically three players: Younis Khan and Misbah will be smashed to pieces while Sohail Khan has no stamina and is too slow to bowl his erratic line and length. But at least he will score a few runs.
I think we can win in Australia. Just need one very good line and length bowler like philander alongside couple of decent spinners.
We will suprise some people in Australia imo. If we can see of the new ball and catch the ball we have a chance. Aussies new players will be under pressure to perform so got to take advantage of that.
Line up the players:Doesn't look good does it.
Even one draw would be an achievement for this lot.
That's a massive ask right now. Our bowlers at the moment are bowling like bowling machines on 'random deliveries' setting.
Our seam bowlers are pretty pedestrian at the moment that's for sure (except Imran Khan for Australian pitches) but then again Australian batting right now is also pretty awful. So should be a competitive series.
Actually, although Imran is a very good bowler in Asian conditions he is completely unsuited to Australian conditions.Our seam bowlers are pretty pedestrian at the moment that's for sure (except Imran Khan for Australian pitches) but then again Australian batting right now is also pretty awful. So should be a competitive series.
I'd agree with you but our preparations have been god awful, squad selections have not helped either. There is no urgency unlike for the England tour.
Line up the players:
Warner v Azhar Ali: 8 v 6
Renshaw v Sami Aslam: 5 v 6
Khawaja v Babar: 7 v 7
Smith v Younis: 8 v 3
Handscomb v Misbah: 5 v 5
Maddinson v Shafiq: 3 v 6
Wade v Sarfraz: 4 v 6
Starc v Amir: 8 v 7
Hazlewood v Sohail: 7 v 4
Bird v Wahab: 4 v 6
Lyon v Yasir: 4 v 8
It's do-able.
So Amir is as good as Hazelwood because you gave both a 7.
Amir is considerably better than Hazlewood but has inferior slips to catch the edges.So Amir is as good as Hazelwood because you gave both a 7.
Amir is considerably better than Hazlewood but has inferior slips to catch the edges.
Hazlewood is a very poor man's version of Asif or McGrath. Terrific accuracy at fast-medium pace, but inferior because he is gunbarrel straight.It's kind of hard to know when you're being serious or not.
How is Amir considerably better?
Cancel the tour on security ground.
Hazlewood is a very poor man's version of Asif or McGrath. Terrific accuracy at fast-medium pace, but inferior because he is gunbarrel straight.
So you think that Amir is just as good as Hazlewood?.
No, I think Amir is considerably better than Hazlewood, but takes less wickets because he bowls to an elderly slip cordon with the reflexes of a blind man.
Hazlewood is a very poor man's version of Asif or McGrath. Terrific accuracy at fast-medium pace, but inferior because he is gunbarrel straight.
I've watched Hazlewood since he was a junior.Thanks you just made me laugh, we need little things like this during the day to make us smile.
No, I think Amir is considerably better than Hazlewood, but takes less wickets because he bowls to an elderly slip cordon with the reflexes of a blind man.
You are assuming that Amir is an inswing bowler like Wasim Akram. He isn't. Not with the red ball.Wasim and Waqar had tons of catches dropped off of them, but still ended ATGs.
You know why?
Because Waqar got people bowled with his Yorkers and LBW at pace.
Wasim was deceptive and could bowl 6 different deliveries and outfox people.
Amir is pedestrian straight at the moment (it could change at some point as I write this), and needs an ultra green track to get those edges. And when fielders don't catch, he goes into moping oblivion.
How in the world would anyone rate Amir as better than Hazelwood and then label himself as Australian is beyond me.
I've watched Hazlewood since he was a junior.
Excellent bowler who has a nagging line and length.
Exceedingly similar to Ehsan Adil, but groomed much better.
Hazlewood is a very poor man's version of Asif or McGrath. Terrific accuracy at fast-medium pace, but inferior because he is gunbarrel straight.
You are assuming that Amir is an inswing bowler like Wasim Akram. He isn't. Not with the red ball.
But he is better with the new ball than Wasim was and he is better at slanting the ball across to the slips. Amir makes the right-handed batsman play more of those balls ironically (for me!) due to his lack of height meaning that he gets less bounce and the batsman can't leave balls on length like they could with Wasim Akram.
Hazlewood moves the ball both ways. Not sure if we are talking about the same Hazlewood here. You watched him and think that he is gun barren straight?
I am sure people underestimating Hazelwood and calling him worse than Amir are going to wake up in a month's time.
They got 1, we got 5.Hope Starc picks up a 10fer.
Pakistan be prepared, Australia have found their own Azhar Ali, Renshaw is going to bore your fielders and sneak a century. Fight fire with fire.
Amla also thinks he is gunbarrel straight and we all know how that worked out.
This gun barrel straight bowler will run through Pakistan's line up at least twice in 3 tests like a knife slices through hot butter.
I am not worried about Starc because he has pace, but he will need breathers.
I am sure people underestimating Hazelwood and calling him worse than Amir are going to wake up in a month's time.
Hazlewood is a really good line and length bowler. No argument.
But he tried to develop some swing in England and it was a disaster.
Yes, the odd one deviates if he hits the seam. But generally he gets batsmen out when they misjudge the line and length and go fishing outside off-stump.
lol these are the best openers technically we've had in a while. They'll come good, we have to be patient.
Pace bowlers are crap yes I agree.
taking 60 overs to score 100 odd runs is the latest example of how they lack the scoring shots. Defense is not the only thing you need to be successful. You have to score which is what matters the most. Survival is good when you are looking to draw but we have to win no?
A quickfire 30 off 20 balls, just puts pressure on the team.
We all saw what happened when Babar Azam threw his wicket in search of quick runs and Sarfraz committed suicide.
Instead of the chase happening, we actually lost.
If you want to win, you need proper batsmen.
I didn't say they should be batting like T20 but at least what modern test cricket requires. They should be able to bat at a standard test rate and not bat like it's 60s of cricket.