What's new

"We signed a proper contract with India, not an MoU" : Shahryar Khan

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
LAHORE: Chairman Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Shaharyar Khan on Monday said that the board had signed a proper contract with Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) in 2014 as a result of which the PCB had favoured India while supporting the now defunct Big Three formula, and it was not just an MoU for the resumption of bilateral series between the two countries.

“We have received a reply from the BCCI about our notice sent to them for not fulfilling the contract and because of it the PCB has suffered huge financial losses.

The BCCI’s reply has two objections,” Shaharyar told Dawn from Karachi. “Firstly, there is no term is included in the contract under which the word of government’s permission is mentioned as necessary. Secondly, it was not an MoU but a contract as India sought PCB’s support for the Big Three formula, from which it earned huge revenue as a member of Big Three.

“Our benefit was only if the bilateral series would have started, which could not be happened, causing us massive losses.

“Our legal team has prepared the case on strong footings and now we will again send a response to the BCCI’s letter before moving to the ICC dispute resolve committee.”

Elaborating further, the PCB chief said: “Let me clear that the PCB’s case is strong and we will go to the last stage to win at the ICC level since it is our right to demand justice.”

Last week, the PCB had sent a notice to BCCI, seeking claims reportedly of $6.4 million for India’s refusal to honour the contract, which was signed three years ago. “It is not our [government] but the Indian government which is creating hurdles in the way of resumption of bilateral cricket and as that term related to the government’s permission is not included in the contract, so, it is not our responsibility to get permission from the Indian government,” he said.

Both the countries have not played bilateral cricket since 2007 when Pakistan visited India for a full series.

Meanwhile, Shaharyar said he was on a three-day visit to Karachi to have talks with high-ups including Sindh chief minister, chief secretary and DG Rangers Sindh on resumption of international cricket in the city.

“We are expecting some international cricket in near future and we also want to hold some matches in Karachi for which detailed meetings with the high-ups of Sindh government are necessary,” Shaharyar said.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1331875/we-signed-a-proper-contract-with-india-not-an-mou-shaharyar
 
If not MOU ,then you have all the options to sue BCCI. Hope you are telling truth Mr. SK
 
Interesting. Game over for BCCI then, provided PCB sincerely takes up this case.
 
If that's true, then the PCB can successfully sue the BCCI.
 
Why does this guy keep talking?
 
So has the PCB withdrawn their support for the big three which is part of the "contract".
 
^Good point, since the bilateral series were on premise of big 3 structure being passed, does it mean withdrawing from Big 3 also makes this contract null and void?

Can't really say what's what untill full details comes out.
 
“We have received a reply from the BCCI about our notice sent to them for not fulfilling the contract and because of it the PCB has suffered huge financial losses.

The BCCI’s reply has two objections,” Shaharyar told Dawn from Karachi. “Firstly, there is no term is included in the contract under which the word of government’s permission is mentioned as necessary. Secondly, it was not an MoU but a contract as India sought PCB’s support for the Big Three formula, from which it earned huge revenue as a member of Big Three.

“Our benefit was only if the bilateral series would have started, which could not be happened, causing us massive losses.

Calling all those who were against the Big 3 ... how about directing your wrath and ire towards those who voted for Big3 since you never tire of telling us how evil that was.
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] etc etc ...
 
Open season on the BCCI at the moment.

But to be honest, I am sure that it was an MoU. The whole argument on the previous threads discussing it was whether an MoU was legally enforceable. After 4 years, SK claims that it was a contract all along. Does not add up.

My guess is that PCB is trying to put pressure on BCCI at a time when it is vunerable and try and get them to agree a series. No way they will actually go the legal route.
 
Elaborating further, the PCB chief said: “Let me clear that the PCB’s case is strong and we will go to the last stage to win at the ICC level since it is our right to demand justice.”

So they are not going to the courts then but an ICC dispute committee .. why do they keep using the word 'legal' ?
 
BCCI never do anything gets wrong so what's the problem? The amount of lies they tell even in the face of some home truths doesn't deter them.
 
This is like buying vote with money... As blatantly as possible.
Both boards should be sued by ICC for corruption.
 
Calling all those who were against the Big 3 ... how about directing your wrath and ire towards those who voted for Big3 since you never tire of telling us how evil that was.
[MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] etc etc ...
I'm English and I live in Australia, and forcefully condemn both boards for joining India in the Big Three coup.
 
Not a day goes by without Sheri uncle talking about his agreement with India :))
 
I'm English and I live in Australia, and forcefully condemn both boards for joining India in the Big Three coup.

Not just ECB and CA, the rest of them voted for the "Big 3" as well. So why just blame the "Big 3".
 
The same paradise in which Kami Akmal was an "aggressive and explosive" opener :)))

He won't answer that but you will see him ranting and raving about TTFs all day but for some bizarre reason Kamran will be left out. :))His reasoning is that he is 'explosive'. Barely an 85 SR at an abysmal average. Even if he was explosive his crap average means he is useless.
 
This is great he is aggressively pursing BCCI. Why should we walk away from much needed cash? It's not even about playing a series anymore. It's about giving us what we are owed. Proud of PCB for having a spine and standing up the bully BCCI
 
from day one the pcb were screaming from rooftops that we hve a signed mou , now suddenly it has become not an official but a propper contract.. !!
 
Every contract has"force majeure" clause. Which give exemptions in arm conflicts. Tension at line of control is enough justification for BCCI.
 
Pakistan to take up India to International Cricket Council

ISLAMABAD, May 10 (APP): Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) would be taking up the matter with the International Cricket Council (ICC) after Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) refused to compensate for not playing with Pakistan in bilateral series as outlined in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU).

According to details, the PCB had received a response from BCCI on the notice sent to BCCI last week demanding compensation for not playing with Pakistan in bilateral series as outlined in the MoU.

BCCI have raised some points. One of them is they don’t consider the MOU a binding legal agreement between the two Boards.
Secondly, they have pointed out that permission of government is necessary for any Indo-Pak series and since their government is not giving them permission, they can’t play with Pakistan.

Talking to APP, a PCB official said PCB would be taking up the matter in the ICC’s Annual General meeting to be held in June. “The agreement to play series against India was a legal contract but India did not honour it,” he said.

He said the final constitution of winding up of the Big 3 would also be approved in the meeting.

http://timesofislamabad.com/pakistan-to-take-up-india-to-international-cricket-council/2017/05/10/
 
Not a day goes by without Sheri uncle talking about his agreement with India :))

As I said in a previous thread, the Sher will have "Honour the MOU !" marked on his tombstone. He'll pursue this fight even from beyond the grave.
 
Back
Top