Rana
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Runs
- 71,608
I, along with others, have been saying this for years: Pakistan cricket's progress has stalled since losing accomplished middle-order batters Mohammad Hafeez and Shoaib Malik in the T20 format. They provided some stability despite the flawed approach of using two accumulators as openers in the powerplay.
Despite continued failures, Pakistan persists with this approach, playing the same players with subpar strike rates for their positions. The disastrous 2024 T20 World Cup performance, where Pakistan struggled against the USA and failed to chase 120 against India, should have prompted change.
Instead, the same underperforming openers, with over 70 games experience, continue to play every match. This is borderline insanity. Why maintain a failed template and only replace players in other positions?
Awarding captaincy to a player with a strike rate of 90 in the last two T20 World Cups defies logic, especially considering their impressive strike rate of 120 in the PSL on Pakistani pitches. It's perplexing to promote mediocrity to leadership.
Despite continued failures, Pakistan persists with this approach, playing the same players with subpar strike rates for their positions. The disastrous 2024 T20 World Cup performance, where Pakistan struggled against the USA and failed to chase 120 against India, should have prompted change.
Instead, the same underperforming openers, with over 70 games experience, continue to play every match. This is borderline insanity. Why maintain a failed template and only replace players in other positions?
Awarding captaincy to a player with a strike rate of 90 in the last two T20 World Cups defies logic, especially considering their impressive strike rate of 120 in the PSL on Pakistani pitches. It's perplexing to promote mediocrity to leadership.
Last edited by a moderator: