What's new

What will be the suitable sentence for the perpetrators of the Sialkot incident?

What should be the sentence for the perpetrators of the Sialkot incident?


  • Total voters
    8

Last Monetarist

T20I Debutant
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Runs
7,910
What should the state prosecutors aim for in this case?

900 workers involved, it'll be an almighty mess to collect evidence of direct involvement in relation to this case.

So what is realistic for the individuals directly implicated?

- Death sentence
- Life imprisonment
- 5-10 year imprisonment
 
Special Representative to Prime Minister on Religious Affairs Tahir Ashrafi on Sunday asked Chief Justice of Pakistan Gulzar Ahmed to treat the Sialkot lynching as a test case and ensure a speedy trial into the case.

He made the remarks while addressing a press conference at the Quran and Seerat Academy in Lahore along with religious leaders from different schools of thought.

The special representative said that followers of all religions and religious parties in the country strongly condemn the lynching, and express grief and concern on linking the incident to religion.

"Those involved in the incident have brought a bad name to the religion as well as the country," he added.

Ashrafi demanded exemplary punishment for the perpetrators of the incident to avoid recurrence of such incidents in future.

He said Muslim, Hindu, Christian and Sikh communities of Pakistan want to convey to the Sri Lankan people that “we are ashamed at the incident and we apologise to you”, adding that all-out efforts would be made to eliminate culture of extremism from the society.

The special representative termed the incident "an individual act", saying it did not represent the whole nation.

Ashrafi further said that so far, 19 key suspects have been arrested. He said the case would be tried in an anti-terrorism court.

He observed that the law of Tauheen-e-Namoos-e-Risalat and Tauheen-e-Mazhab as well as the courts and legal procedure are already in place, therefore, no one should be allowed to take law into their hands.

On the occasion, the special representative announced that a delegation of clerics, headed by Federal Minister for Religious Affairs Pir Noor-ul-Haq Qadri, would visit the Sri Lankan embassy to express their grief over the tragic incident.

The religious leadership expressing solidarity with the people of Sri Lanka also apologised on brutal murder of Sri Lankan factory manager who was lynched to death in tragic Sialkot incident.

The religious leadership also stated unanimously that Sialkot tragic incident will be strongly condemned in all mosques across the country in Friday congregations and in all churches and places of worship on Sunday.

Central leaders of all the religions of Pakistan including Muslims, Christians, Hindu, Sikh religions and all Muslim schools of thought termed the Sialkot tragic incident as barbaric and brutal and condemned it vehemently expressing solidarity with the victim's family and the people of Sri Lanka.

The lynching of the Sri Lankan National factory manager was not religious but of an administrative nature as the slain factory manager used to ask the factory workers to do work with honesty and diligence.

The religious leadership also announced that on Friday, 'Condemnation Day' will be observed across the country against tragic incident of Sialkot and public will be given awareness on blasphemy laws.

The Pakistan Ulema Council and Interfaith Harmony Councils also announced giving shields and acclamation certificates to the two brave young men who did their best to rescue the Sri Lankan manager from mob.

The joint meeting of religious leadership was attended by Christian leaders Father James Channan, Dr Majeed Abel, Khateeb of Datadarbar Mosque Muhammad Ramzan Sialvi, Muhammad Ali Naqshbandi, Maulana Abdul Wahab Rupari, Sikh leader Dr. Sikandar Singh, Hindu leader Bhagat Lal Khokhar, Pir Allama Zubair Abid, Hafiz Noman, Naeem Badshah, Mahmood. Ghaznavi, Emanul Khokhar, Hafiz Abdul Wahab Rupari, Hafiz Kazim Raza, Abdul Ghaffar Farooqi, Maulana Fazal Din, Maulana Aslam Qadri, Qari Mubashir Rahimi and others were also present on this occasion.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2332591/ashrafi-asks-cjp-to-treat-sialkot-lynching-as-test-case
 
Suitable punishment? Not death. Death is the easy way out.

How about full blown torture. Hogtie them and drag’em with horses through the rough, then pour salt and alcohol over their wounds. Once done, rinse and repeat. Keep them alive and in pain, deny them death.
 
Last edited:
The quantum of punishment does not matter. It wont solve anything. Bcoz the perpetrators believe they are martyrs for a just cause

The way forward is de-radicalization of the society. That's the difficult part
 
First of all, the state is not gonna hang even 500 of the people. Infact, not even 100 people will be hanged, even though in the videos you can see that punches, kicks of 500+ people. 2-3 people might get hanged, 7-8 would probably get life imprisonment. The rest of the people would eventually be freed after 10 years. Infact, Pakistans life imprisonment is very short.

Also, the lawyers will be able to get most of these guys free. Pakistan as always is emotional and whenever any tragedy happens we love putting charges of Terrorism or Terrorist act on people. Its really important that relevent laws are filed when filling an FIR or else you make the case weak in the court.



Anyways, long story short, the punishment means nothing. The govt could release all the killers and I wouldn't even care. By hanging them, or by keeping in jail or even by releasing them wont make any difference.

Real justice would be to make sure that Priyantha was the last guy to die under blasphemy mobs. But we all know that Priyantha was the not the first to die and wont be the last to die. There would be more deaths.

You can hang 100 perpetrators each time a mob accused blasphemy case comes forward, its not gonna solve the real issue. The real issue can only be solved if you tap the grass roots.

Thus, any sentence means nothing, our society still doesnt become a better place.
 
nothing gonna happened by going our history. Nothing happened in past.


By tomorrow we all will forget this incident. Then in 6 months new incident will happen.
 
What should the state prosecutors aim for in this case?

900 workers involved, it'll be an almighty mess to collect evidence of direct involvement in relation to this case.

So what is realistic for the individuals directly implicated?

- Death sentence
- Life imprisonment
- 5-10 year imprisonment

Definitely life imprisonment for those 30 odd individuals who have been the main attacker. Maybe capital punishment for some depending on evidence and circumstances. But harsh judgement is necessary to set an example.

At the same time while quick justice is important, this can also be a great opportunity for Pakistan to push for reforms on blasphemy law. Understand that abolition is difficult with certain nuisance groups having active space, but abolition of death penalty and a rigorous framework with equally harsh punishment for false allegations can be a start.
 
First of all, the state is not gonna hang even 500 of the people. Infact, not even 100 people will be hanged, even though in the videos you can see that punches, kicks of 500+ people. 2-3 people might get hanged, 7-8 would probably get life imprisonment. The rest of the people would eventually be freed after 10 years. Infact, Pakistans life imprisonment is very short.

Also, the lawyers will be able to get most of these guys free. Pakistan as always is emotional and whenever any tragedy happens we love putting charges of Terrorism or Terrorist act on people. Its really important that relevent laws are filed when filling an FIR or else you make the case weak in the court.



Anyways, long story short, the punishment means nothing. The govt could release all the killers and I wouldn't even care. By hanging them, or by keeping in jail or even by releasing them wont make any difference.

Real justice would be to make sure that Priyantha was the last guy to die under blasphemy mobs. But we all know that Priyantha was the not the first to die and wont be the last to die. There would be more deaths.

You can hang 100 perpetrators each time a mob accused blasphemy case comes forward, its not gonna solve the real issue. The real issue can only be solved if you tap the grass roots.

Thus, any sentence means nothing, our society still doesnt become a better place.

Bro they do not need lawyers.
Only thing they need is one phone call from any kind of ministers/officers.
 
What will be a suitable sentence?

Hanging, and the bodies thrown into shark infested waters in the Arabia sea so there are no shrines built to these verminous human beings...because let's be honest, to some in Pakistan, perhaps many, they are heroes for protecting the honour of Islam.
 
The quantum of punishment does not matter. It wont solve anything. Bcoz the perpetrators believe they are martyrs for a just cause

The way forward is de-radicalization of the society. That's the difficult part

This, in a nutshell.

The point of capital punishment is to strike fear in the hearts of people so that the crime is not repeated again. What's the point of death sentence when none of the perpetrators fear death and are brainwashed to believe in their own mind that there's a higher reward that's waiting for them in the heaven due to their actions. Not just the accused, but there'd be a fair few who share the sentiments of the attackers, wishing they had the opportunity to do the same and attain glory and 'martyrdom'. And they'd be part of a mob doing the same some years later, if the opportunity arose. Religion is opium for the masses, particularly in our part of the world.

Killing these people would be just treating the symptom but not curing the disease.
 
'Time to take action': Govt to review counter-terrorism strategy after Sialkot lynching, says Mazari

Human Rights Minister Dr Shireen Mazari said on Monday that the government had decided to review the National Action Plan (NAP) on counter-terrorism in the wake of the brutal lynching of a Sialkot factory manager Priyantha Kumara — a Sri Lankan national — over blasphemy allegations last week.

The National Action Plan, enacted through a strong political consensus after the 2014 attack on the Army Public School in Peshawar, was aimed at taking result-oriented measures to counter terrorism in the country.

The minister's remarks come amid countrywide outrage after a mob comprising hundreds of protestors tortured to death Kumara over blasphemy allegations and then burnt his body on Friday.

Speaking exclusively to Dawn.com, the minister rued the recurrence of such incidents and called for "strict government action", terming it the "need of the hour".

"This lynching was not the first of its kind. We have seen the case of Mashal Khan, and two of our Christian community members were burnt... it's now time to take definitive action as the state".

She said the distortion of religion and torture of people in its wake should be condemned in the strongest terms.

The human rights minister also expressed worry over growing "extremism" in the country, saying the NAP had to be fully enforced to combat the menace.

"We need to review our laws for devising a comprehensive strategy to prevent such incidents in the future," Mazari stressed. Specifically pointing to the NAP, the minister said it must be seen where the action plan had not been implemented.

She also called upon different parties within the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) to "de-link" themselves from Maulana Fazlur Rehman and his leadership for his controversial statement in which he had said that if the state did not take action against those accused of blasphemy, then such incidents will continue to happen.

In the same breath, she defended Defence Minister Pervez Khattak, saying he had already clarified on Twitter that he was misunderstood and that his remarks were reported out of context in sections of the media. It remains unclear which tweet the minister was referring to with regards to the clarification.

Addressing a media talk in Peshawar a day earlier, Khattak had suggested that the ghastly incident should not be linked to the government's decision to lift the ban on the Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), saying "murders take place" when young people get emotional.

"You know the reasons [behind this incident] too. When children ... grow up, they become spirited and do things out of emotions. This does not mean 'this was the result of that action'," he had stressed, saying in Sialkot too, some young men had gathered and accused Kumara of disrespecting Islam, which led to the "sudden" lynching.

"We should focus on his clarification that what he had said was misunderstood and reported out of context," said the minister, adding that the prime minister's position was very clear on the issue and this was also the government's position.

'Is the govt mulling a ban on the TLP'?
To a question whether the government planned to ban the TLP after the Sialkot incident, she said the federal cabinet would debate on it before reaching any final decision.

The TLP was linked to the gory incident by users on social media, but the group distanced itself from the lynching and condemned it.

Earlier in October, the TLP and the federal government had reached an agreement after many rounds of talks and two weeks of clashes which left seven policemen and a number of TLP workers dead. The agreement was kept secret, but leaked information suggested consensus on removing the party from the list of banned organisations, release of TLP chief Saad Hussain Rizvi and setting TLP workers free that were held under various charges including anti-terrorism.

A week later, on November 7, the federal cabinet had decided to revoke the declaration putting the TLP on the list of “proscribed” organisations under the country’s anti-terrorism law.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1662259/t...m-strategy-after-sialkot-lynching-says-mazari
 
What does the death sentence achieve? An easy way out?

There has to be something more, something more terrifying for those who witness this. So that in the future, any idiot who thinks it is ok to accuse a non Muslim of blasphemy to vent personal frustrations will think 1 million times before going ahead with it.
 
Just hope in the process they dont end up punishing any one innocent.
 
What does the death sentence achieve? An easy way out?

There has to be something more, something more terrifying for those who witness this. So that in the future, any idiot who thinks it is ok to accuse a non Muslim of blasphemy to vent personal frustrations will think 1 million times before going ahead with it.

Like what..

How will you induce fear in a person who doesn't fear death?
 
Like what..

How will you induce fear in a person who doesn't fear death?

Tell them they will be thrown into a cage with lions as a death penalty if they have wrongfully accused someone of blasphemy leading to that innocent person’s death.

Would love to see them embrace such a death.
 
Tell them they will be thrown into a cage with lions as a death penalty if they have wrongfully accused someone of blasphemy leading to that innocent person’s death.

Would love to see them embrace such a death.

Come on man, this might happen in movies or in North Korea for Kim to punish his uncles. Very unrealistic to see it happening in the rest of the world.
 
Meanwhile, the so called ghazis recieved 6 daigs of food and doezen of blankets by the traders.......

Same traders who are apologising to sri lanka... Same police that says we were overpowered by the mob......
 
Come on man, this might happen in movies or in North Korea for Kim to punish his uncles. Very unrealistic to see it happening in the rest of the world.

So until you do not take such unrealistic measures, forget that anything will change
 
I think people have bought into the theory about these type of people not fearing death.

In fact very few of these extremists fall into this category. Perhaps some Taliban and ISIS, and of course suicide bombers.

These lynchers arent as 'brave' as that. They are extremist in groups but not to that level. In their private lives they will be stalking white girls on FB and watching pornography.

They are hypocrites of the highest order and will be cowering at the prospect of death...about what will happen to their loved ones and wives etc.

Ideally they should be buried alive and not given an Islamic funeral.
 
Hanging, burning alive, putting them behind the bars is, meaningless until the blasphemy law is removed, and no efforts undertaken to educate the masses about Blasphemy.

Understandably, it won't happen, but none of the punishment will deter anyone from being barbaric unless and until the State of Pakistan goes against ill-used of blasphemy law by few political parties.

Vast majority of the people in my circle, are upset, sick to their stomach and support the removal of the blasphemy law.
 
Severe punishments are needed. That's for sure.

They brought shame to Islam even though they may think they have honored Islam.

Also, ulemas need to give fatwas that this type of action is not okay. They have a key role to play.
 
Last edited:
So until you do not take such unrealistic measures, forget that anything will change

You're just trying to treat the symptom, rather than the disease. The mob is merely the symptom. You can punish them, but it will keep happening again though. Qadri was hanged, did it change things.. It's like giving Paracetamol to control the pain in a person who has cancer. The pain may subside temporarily, but it will keep happening again and again until you root out the cancer itself from the body.

Let's for argument sake assume that the victim had knowingly committed blasphemy. Then watch the public opinions change on the same incident. The outright ones will justify the lynching and say he deserved it while the educated liberal elite would say let the law take its course, which awards the death penalty anyway for such crimes. There in lies the issue, that people think killing someone legally or illegally is an acceptable action for hurting his religious sentiments.

This is silly because "hurting one's religious sentiments" differs with every person. I might be okay to take jokes on religion, but another person might get enraged with fury on such jokes. This leads to bizarre circumstances when people accuse someone of hurting their religious sentiments for simply peeling posters off a wall or a machine or throwing a newspaper containing religious text, etc., and they end up taking the law into their hands.
 
You're just trying to treat the symptom, rather than the disease. The mob is merely the symptom. You can punish them, but it will keep happening again though. Qadri was hanged, did it change things.. It's like giving Paracetamol to control the pain in a person who has cancer. The pain may subside temporarily, but it will keep happening again and again until you root out the cancer itself from the body.

Let's for argument sake assume that the victim had knowingly committed blasphemy. Then watch the public opinions change on the same incident. The outright ones will justify the lynching and say he deserved it while the educated liberal elite would say let the law take its course, which awards the death penalty anyway for such crimes. There in lies the issue, that people think killing someone legally or illegally is an acceptable action for hurting his religious sentiments.

This is silly because "hurting one's religious sentiments" differs with every person. I might be okay to take jokes on religion, but another person might get enraged with fury on such jokes. This leads to bizarre circumstances when people accuse someone of hurting their religious sentiments for simply peeling posters off a wall or a machine or throwing a newspaper containing religious text, etc., and they end up taking the law into their hands.

Unless Pakistan goes through a world war 2 like situation in which Nazi Germany was completely seized and overpowered by the allied forces, it cannot have a complete overhaul of mindset.

Education is apparently the answer but Pakistan is Trillions of dollars, resources such as teachers willing to work in Pakistan before it can erase the extremist ideology.
 
people think killing someone legally or illegally is an acceptable action for hurting his religious sentiments.

This is silly because "hurting one's religious sentiments" differs with every person. I might be okay to take jokes on religion, but another person might get enraged with fury on such jokes. This leads to bizarre circumstances when people accuse someone of hurting their religious sentiments for simply peeling posters off a wall or a machine or throwing a newspaper containing religious text, etc., and they end up taking the law into their hands.

Those laws and anyone supporting such law belongs in the medieval age.
 
I think these people need to be humiliated. Outcast them and lable them as non muslims by the highest religious body in Pakistan. Let them survive the rest of their life with fear of blasphemy and minority agony for the rest of their life.
 
Punishment will not make a difference because radicalisation is the root cause which nobody is willing to discuss. The country is full of hate preachers who brainwash children into killing blasphemers, Hindus and Christians, and the government has adopted hands-off approach to extremism. We have seen how the government as well as the military surrendered to the TLP five times in the last 4 years despite the TLP killing at least 20 police officers. All criminal cases against them were dropped.

There are videos of teachers in schools (not religious schools) telling kids that the only purpose in their life should be killing blasphemers. However, the government cannot even arrest a single extremist or hate preacher because doing so would mean putting a target of their own backs. The problem of extremism in Pakistan is beyond recovery. Any mob can kill anyone in the name of religion without facing any ramifications. All previous killers who killed alleged blasphemers have become national heroes. It is a hopeless situation and my advice to all is to "Pakistan say zinda bhaag".
 
So the Anti-Terrorism Court ('ATC') has sentenced the accused perpetrator to one year in prison and imposed a fine of Rs 10,000.

Pitiful.
 
NAROWAL: A man was sentenced to one-year imprisonment and a fine of Rs10,000 on Friday by the Gujranwala anti-terrorism court for justifying the killing of a Sri Lankan citizen on social media and inciting religious sentiments.

Priyantha Kumara, a Sri Lankan citizen, general manager of Rajco Industry and Garments Factory, was lynched by a mob at the factory on Dec 3, 2021, on Wazirabad Road in Sialkot.

Convict Muhammad Adnan, 27, of Nizampur, Sialkot, uploaded a video on his YouTube channel of the murder of Priyantha and justified the killing and burning of the body.

On Dec 5, on the request of Assistant Sub-Inspector Mubarak Ali, an FIR was registered against Adnan at Ringpura Police Station for spreading religious hatred and inciting public sentiments.


He stood trial in the anti-terrorism court of Gujranwala. Judge Natasha Naseem announced the verdict on Friday.

Other accused in the murder case of the Sri Lankan citizen are on physical remand. Those accused will be produced before the anti-terrorism court in Gujranwala on Jan 31.

Published in Dawn, January 22nd, 2022
 
Back
Top