What's new

Which country has best handled the coronavirus pandemic?

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
As governments fumbled their coronavirus response, these four got it right. Here's how.

London (CNN)Like a line of dominoes, country after country has been shut down by the novel coronavirus. Despite signs the threat was making its way across the globe, there was a clear pattern of response in many parts of the world -- denial, fumbling and, eventually, lockdown.

In our globalized world, it's puzzling that so few lessons were learned in the early weeks of each country's outbreak, when the chances of containing and stopping the virus were highest. Now the focus is on flattening the curve, or slowing the virus' spread, to keep death tolls from climbing further.

As much of the world mulls gradually lifting lockdowns, there are still lessons to be learned from these four places that got it right. Here are 12 of those lessons.

Taiwan

Sitting just 180 kilometers (110 miles) off the coast of mainland China, Taiwan's outbreak could have been disastrous. At the end of January, the island was estimated to have had the second-highest number of cases in the world, according to Johns Hopkins University (JHU). 

But Taiwan, with a population of around 24 million people, has recorded just over 390 cases and six deaths, and yesterday, it reported no new cases at all. It's managed to do that without implementing severe restrictions, like lockdowns, or school and nursery closures.

In terms of its death toll, at least, Taiwan doesn't even have much of a curve to flatten, more of a line with a couple of rigid steps.

Compare that to the United States -- now the world's hardest-hit nation, at least in raw numbers -- which has reported at least 26,000 deaths. Even when you take population size into account, a level of success like Taiwan's could have meant just 83 deaths in the US.

Although Taiwan has high-quality universal health care, its success lies in its preparedness, speed, central command and rigorous contact tracing.

Lesson #1: Be prepared

Taiwan's preparedness came largely from some hard-learned lessons from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003, which killed 181 people on the island.

As a result, the island established a specialized Central Epidemic Command Center, which could be activated to coordinate a response in the event of an outbreak. In a sign of how Taiwan wanted to get ahead of the coronavirus, the center was activated on January 20, a day before the island even confirmed its first infection.

Because its authority was already established, the center was able to implement stringent measures without being slowed down by lengthy political processes. It put more than 120 action items into place within three weeks, according to a list published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). That list alone could serve as a manual on exactly what to do during an outbreak.

Lesson #2: Be quick

Taiwan's action came well before its first Covid-19 infection was confirmed on January 21. Three weeks before, within days of China's first reported case to the World Health Organization (WHO), Taiwanese officials began boarding and inspecting passengers for fever and pneumonia symptoms on flights from Wuhan, the original epicenter of the virus in China. The island issued a travel alert for Wuhan on January 20, and two days later, still with just a single case, officials began updating the public in daily briefings.

A week after its first case, Taiwan began electronic monitoring of quarantined individuals via government-issued cell phones, and announced travel and entry restrictions, mostly targeting China's Hubei province, of which Wuhan is the capital. Just about every day after until the end of February, the government implemented new measures to keep the virus at bay.

Taiwan had only 329 cases when it imposed strict social distancing measures on April 1. In comparison, there were already 335 deaths and more than 3,000 cases on March 20, when Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced that pubs and restaurants were to close, and that most children would be pulled from schools and nurseries. And as the UK is not testing widely, the true number of infections is believed to be much higher than official figures show.

Lesson #3: Test, trace and quarantine

Authorities carried out widespread testing and tracing the contacts of infected people, putting them all under quarantine. It proactively tested anyone who got off cruise ships and even retested people diagnosed with influenza or pneumonia, to make sure they hadn't been misdiagnosed and were infected with coronavirus.

Lesson #4: Use data and tech

"A coordinated government response with full collaboration of its citizenry [was] combined with the use of big data and technology," associate professor of pediatrics at Stanford Medicine, Jason Wang, told CNN. Wang has also studied public health policy and co-authored the JAMA report on Taiwan's response.
Taiwan merged national health insurance data with customs and immigration databases to create real-time alerts to help identify vulnerable populations.

"Having a good health data system helps with monitoring the spread of the disease and allows for its early detection. When someone sees a physician for respiratory symptoms, the national health insurance database will have a record of it. It is easier to track clusters of outbreaks," Wang said.

Taiwan used mandatory online reporting and check-ins for 14 days after travel restrictions. It also employed "digital fencing" for close to 55,000 people in home quarantine, where alarms would sound if a quarantined person wandered too far from home. The technical surveillance methods used in Taiwan and by other governments have raised privacy concerns from civil society groups.

Iceland

Getting a coronavirus test in many countries can be near impossible, unless you're already very ill. Not so in Iceland, where anyone who wants a test gets one. Widespread testing has been crucial to the country's low number of infections and deaths, authorities there say. Only around 1,700 people have been infected in Iceland, and only eight have died.

Lesson #5: Be aggressive

Iceland's response to the coronavirus hasn't been particularly innovative. It's just been meticulous and quick. Like Taiwan, its speed has meant it hasn't had to be too restrictive -- people can still meet in groups of up to 20, if they stay two meters away from each other. While universities are closed, schools and nurseries are still open, allowing more parents to work.

"From the beginning, since we diagnosed our first case, we worked according to our plan. Our plan was to be aggressive in detecting and diagnosing individuals, putting them into isolation, and to be very aggressive in our contact tracing. We used the police force and the healthcare system to sit down and contact trace every newly diagnosed case," Iceland's chief epidemiologist Thorolfur Gudnason told CNN.

"We are finding that above 60% of new cases are in people already quarantined. So that showed that contact tracing and quarantining contacts was a good move for us," Gudnason said.

Lesson #6: Get the private sector involved

In a public-private partnership between the National University Hospital of Iceland and biotech company deCODE Genetics, Iceland designed tests early and expects to have tested 10% of its population by the end of this week. It aims to test just about everyone and has already become a valuable laboratory for the world to learn more about the novel virus.

Recent revelations that 50% of the people who tested positive in a lab in Iceland showed no symptoms at all, for example, has prompted other countries to take firmer action through social distancing, as they begin to realize preventing the virus' spread will be more challenging than initially thought.

Kári Stefánsson, CEO and director of deCODE Geneticsm, told CNN that as of Monday, it had found 528 mutations of the coronavirus in mass testing in the community. These mutations could give insight to how lethal the virus becomes and offers important data to the world to better understand how it operates.

Lesson #7: Act preventatively

Icelandic Health Minister Svandís Svavarsdóttir has emphasized speed as a powerful tool, saying the approach is to stay "ahead of the curve." The country appears to have done just that. After just six imported cases were confirmed on March 3, Iceland immediately issued quarantine measures for all travelers returning from Italy, and increased travel restrictions in the following weeks.

The National Police Commissioner declared a state of emergency on March 6, when the first two community-transmitted infections were confirmed. This sent a signal to government bodies to improve their preparedness, but it kept public gatherings as they were, only warning vulnerable people to stay away from crowded places.

The country closed universities and junior colleges on March 13 and banned gatherings of more than 100 people on March 16, when it had just 61 confirmed cases and not a single death.

Three days later, all Icelandic residents that entered the country were required to go into 14 days of quarantine, regardless of where they were traveling from.

It wasn't until after all this action that, on March 24, Iceland's first death was reported. That same day, authorities banned gatherings of above 20 people and shut down public amenities, such as bars, swimming pools, museums and gyms.

Lesson #8: Use tech, but respect privacy

Like in Taiwan, Icelandic officials also made an app available for people to download to help chart the virus' spread. It creates a log of where the user has been. Users don't have to share that data with authorities -- but many do as it helps contact-tracing teams work out who may have been put at risk.

In comparison, the UK's response has been slow. A government-supported app is only now in the works and is weeks away from launching. As it lags behind in testing, it is only just now looking into public-private partnerships.

South Korea

It's telling that South Korea reported its first coronavirus case at around the same time as the US and UK. South Korea is confirming aroundd 30 new cases a day, while in the UK it's around 5,000, and the US it's more than 20,000.

The way each country tests varies, but their death rates among the population contrast just as dramatically. Fewer than one in every 100,000 people in South Korea's population have died from the virus, while in the UK it's around 18. It's almost eight in every 100,000 in the US, JHU data shows.

Lesson #9: You can drive-through test

South Korea's success has been largely down to its testing, according to Dr. Eom Joong Sik from the Gil Medical Center near Seoul. Eom is treating coronavirus patients in hospital and sits on a committee that advises the government in its response.

"Early diagnosis, early quarantine and early treatment are key," he told CNN.

"Since the first patient was confirmed, by installing more than 500 screening clinics all over the country, we sorted suspected cases and conducted tests, and we have worked hard to develop and maintain a system to conduct many tests with a small workforce over a short period of time," he said.

The country has also been innovative in how it tests. Eom's advisory team had hundreds of drive-through booths, just like at a McDonald's, set up across the country to offer tests that were largely free, quick and done by staff at a safe distance. The US has since replicated that model in some states.

On March 16, the WHO called on governments of the world to "test, test, test." South Korea had already been doing that for weeks, and has to date tested more than 500,000 people, among the highest number in the world per capita.

Many countries are struggling to carry out thousands of tests each day. It's so difficult to get tested in the UK, for example, that people have been turning to mail-order kits, in an industry that hasn't yet been regulated by the government.

South Korea was also quick to move, implementing quarantining and screening measures for people arriving from Wuhan on January 3, more than two weeks before the country's first infection was even confirmed. Authorities rolled out a series of travel restrictions over the weeks after.

South Korea has also been rigorous in its contact tracing, though it was able to do that easily when it realized a large number of cases could be traced to one religious group in the city of Daegu, making contact tracing easier and giving authorities a specific area to carry out intensive testing.

"By carrying out tests on all members of the congregation and diagnosing even infected people without symptoms, the government carried out quarantine and treatment side by side," Eom said.

Once Daegu was established as the epicenter, authorities were ready with the ability and political will to test broadly, to trace contacts of people infected, and to quarantine them to try and contain the virus before it became a case of mitigating widescale death, as is now the case in much of Europe and the US.

Lesson #10: Learn from the past

South Korea was able to move quickly because, like Taiwan and many other Asian nations, it had been burned before. South Korea was mostly unaffected by the SARS outbreak, only reporting three cases and no deaths at all. But it was caught off guard by the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2015, when it recorded 186 cases and 38 deaths, making it the worst-impacted country outside the Middle East.

So the political will needed to enforce measures during the coronavirus outbreak wasn't a problem and there was good coordination between the central government and the provinces.

It also helped that South Korea is one of the most technologically innovative countries in the world. Much of life there is already conducted online, so developing and enforcing the use of an app to monitor people in quarantine wasn't too difficult, though activists there too have warned of invasion of privacy.

Germany

Germany's case is a little different. The country hasn't really been able to keep infection numbers at bay much better than some of the hardest-hit nations. It currently has more than 132,000 confirmed infections, the fifth-highest in the world, JHU reports.

But Germany has been able to keep the death rate in its population relatively low. More than 3,400 people have died from the virus in Germany, around four people in every 100,000 across the country. That's well below Italy's 35 and the UK's 18.

Lesson #11: Test more as restrictions ease

Germany's success has also been its mass testing, but its well-resourced universal healthcare system has played a major role too, according to Martin Stürmer, a virologist who heads IMD Labor in Frankfurt, one of the labs conducting tests. Germany has also drawn in the private sector to make sure enough tests are carried out.

"From the beginning, Germany didn't stick to one or two or three central labs doing all the tests. Many private companies were involved, so we've been able to do 100,000 tests a day," Stürmer told CNN.

"There are some countries that have done it even better than Germany, in controlling infections, but what's quite important is broad testing, where we were able to see what was happening in our population. Only with mass testing can you identify people who might be infected."

Like Taiwan, South Korea and Iceland, Germany devised a test for the coronavirus and prepared a large number of kits early, well before the country even reported its first death.

As German Chancellor Angela Merkel announced Wednesday that the country would begin gradually scaling back its lockdown, the country is planning on carrying out even more tests, in case the increased contact leads to a second wave of infections. Like many countries, it will also test for antibodies to try and determine who among the community may be immune to the virus.

Germany's death toll has remained relatively low in part because the coronavirus trickled into the country mostly in young people. Many had been visiting Italy or Austria on ski trips.

Authorities were able to test people returning to Germany from these ski resorts and trace their contacts for testing too. Most of those people were young, and still today, the biggest age group by infections is 35-59, followed by 15-34. The virus is proving to be deadlier among the elderly around the world.

But as communal infections in the country grow, Stürmer fears that more elderly people could die in coming weeks and that the country's death rate will go up.

Germany recorded 315 deaths from complications related to Covid-19 in the past 24 hours, the country's center for disease control, the Robert Koch Institute, wrote on its website on Thursday. This is the first time more than 300 deaths have been reported in a 24-hour span.

Lesson #12: Build capacity at hospitals

Germany ranks 18th in the world in terms of access to quality healthcare, according to an index published by The Lancet, sitting above the UK at 23rd and the US at 29th. But these indices only tell us so much. Italy, for example, ranks ninth and the country also carried out rigorous testing, yet it has recorded the second-highest number of deaths per capita in the world, after Spain.

In this situation, the difference appears to be the German healthcare system's huge capacity. Germany is projected to need about 12,000 beds at the peak of this outbreak in the middle of the month, according to projections from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. It has over 147,000, more than 10 times its need.

In contrast, the US has around 94,000 beds, some 15,000 beds short of its need. Germany has more spare beds in intensive care units that Italy has altogether.

In fact, Germany's health system has such a large capacity, its hospitals are now treating people for coronavirus from Italy, Spain and France.

Authorities have been able to get people with even moderate symptoms to hospital well before their conditions deteriorate, leading some experts to consider whether treating people early, getting them on ventilators before their condition worsens, for example, improves their chances for survival.

"Germany is not in a situation where the healthcare system is overloaded, like you see in Italy, where they need to decide whether to treat a patient or not. We don't have that," Stürmer said.

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/16/world/coronavirus-response-lessons-learned-intl/index.html
 
Last edited:
Without opening the link I would say

Korea
Germany
Thailand (considering they could have been so much worse)
Pakistan (no seriously, 5th populous country in world, but no knee jerk reactions, only mistake was not quarantining Iran returnees)
 
Without opening the link I would say

Korea
Germany
Thailand (considering they could have been so much worse)
Pakistan (no seriously, 5th populous country in world, but no knee jerk reactions, only mistake was not quarantining Iran returnees)

The only way to judge this will be in a month from now when the true effects of this relaxation is known.

Given how life has returned to normal in China, I would say they have done it quite well
 
I would say Germany. The way people in Karachi were beating up policemen and the way people were performing Friday prayers without any social distancing. It was terrible. Pakistan got lucky in a sense that no one travels to Pakistan as a tourist, 1 in 1000, and moreover, Pakistanis do not get to travel elsewhere in droves apart from Iran again not in huge numbers. So in a sense, Pakistan has God blessings i.e only during this pandemic Pakistan's bottom passport ranking After Afghanistan and Iraq have come to fruition. As it came into existence on the day of 27 Ramadan so Pakistan has got special blessings from Almighty God and spared the custodians of Islam from this pandemic.

Other than that, Germany has always been God's favorite people. Be it brains and beauty they have got it covered. Had not been their brains at work, this place would have been a pitch dark hole. So no surprise here. Very educated and rule abiding people. They do not even break signals even if there is no car or no one is watching over your shoulders. No wonder they follow social distancing like a T and follow other hygiene precautions.

Considering the facts that how evil the USA and China have been in killing innocent people over the decades so hardly it has been a surpise that it is leading the deaths toll among other countries. I am more than sure not even 9/11 caused such as an impact on its economy.

If you kill his innocent human beings without any logical reasons, then, He is going to punish them. Look how easy it is for HIM to turn the whole world upside down. God acts like that in an empty vacuum/space. When it defies LOGIC, then, the rest assured is, GOD IS TALKING!
 
Last edited:
South Korea has done an exceptional job. They reacted early and implemented many testing stations.
 
Taiwan coz it didn’t listen to WHO and used its past experiences with China and SARS to make decisions.
 
I would say Germany. The way people in Karachi were beating up policemen and the way people were performing Friday prayers without any social distancing. It was terrible. Pakistan got lucky in a sense that no one travels to Pakistan as a tourist, 1 in 1000, and moreover, Pakistanis do not get to travel elsewhere in droves apart from Iran again not in huge numbers. So in a sense, Pakistan has God blessings i.e only during this pandemic Pakistan's bottom passport ranking After Afghanistan and Iraq have come to fruition. As it came into existence on the day of 27 Ramadan so Pakistan has got special blessings from Almighty God and spared the custodians of Islam from this pandemic.

Other than that, Germany has always been God's favorite people. Be it brains and beauty they have got it covered. Had not been their brains at work, this place would have been a pitch dark hole. So no surprise here. Very educated and rule abiding people. They do not even break signals even if there is no car or no one is watching over your shoulders. No wonder they follow social distancing like a T and follow other hygiene precautions.

Considering the facts that how evil the USA and China have been in killing innocent people over the decades so hardly it has been a surpise that it is leading the deaths toll among other countries. I am more than sure not even 9/11 caused such as an impact on its economy.

If you kill his innocent human beings without any logical reasons, then, He is going to punish them. Look how easy it is for HIM to turn the whole world upside down. God acts like that in an empty vacuum/space. When it defies LOGIC, then, the rest assured is, GOD IS TALKING!

Not a very intelligent post, no reason to insult Pakistan or its passport. How many people travel to and from Iran, I'm sure less than Pakistan. Pakistan is not world's hottest tourist destination but Pakistanis and others travel to and from Pakistan in big numbers, thanks to huge number of expats.

Credit should be given where its due. Considering Pakistan's limited resources and complicated domestic situation including Mullahs, Pakistan government is doing a good job, otherwise things would have been really bad.

India is also doing a very good job, considering the huge population.

I don;t trust China's stats, but S Korea has done the best job so far.

England really did a horrible job, particularly in regards to providing safety to their health care providers.

Overall USA, even with its huge resources has done the worst job in the world.
 
Is it over yet? Most of the countries are on lockdown. Once it is lifted another wave will come. This is just the end of the beginning not beginning of the end (until a vaccine is found).
 
The way it should be measured is based on population and international traveller or business activity, Because this was a foreign virus.
New Zealand and Australia have done well till now in containing the spread
 
I think Taiwan and South Korea handled it really well. Western countries were sloppy.
 
South Korea, Taiwan, New Zealand and Hong Kong. Singapore really messed up and all bangla workers got infected
 
New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has said her country has "done what few countries have been able to do" and contained the community spread of Covid-19 and can start easing its lockdown measures. As the BBC's Shaimaa Khalil writes, the country's success - and Ardern's leadership - have won it global attention.

On 13 March, New Zealand was about to mark the first anniversary of the Christchurch shooting with a national memorial event.

I asked Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern then if she was concerned about hosting such a large gathering, just after the World Health Organization (WHO) had declared a pandemic. She said she wasn't, based on the existing scientific advice.

Things changed overnight. Not only was the event cancelled, the prime minister announced that almost everyone coming into New Zealand would have to self-isolate for 14 days.

It was among the earliest and toughest self-isolation measures in the world, which, a week later, would lead to a complete lockdown.

"We're going hard and we're going early," Ms Ardern told the public. "We only have 102 cases, but so did Italy once."

During the next two weeks of lockdown, New Zealand saw a steady decline in the number of new cases. To date, it has had 12 deaths, and has confirmed that on average each infected person is passing the virus to fewer than one other person.

The country is now preparing to move out of its most severe level of lockdown on 28 April.

And while there has been some criticism over how the government has reacted, others say New Zealand has offered a model response of empathy, clarity and trust in science.

Health before the economy

New Zealand is of course a small nation - its population is smaller than New York City's - and it is remote with easily sealable borders, which all played in its favour when the virus broke out.

But its relative success - it has among the lowest cases per capita in the world - has mainly been attributed to the clarity of the message coming from the government.

Unlike the countries that declared "war on Covid-19", the government's message was that of a country coming together. It urged people to "Unite Against Covid-19". Ms Ardern has repeatedly called the country "our team of five million".

"Jacinda [Ardern] is a brilliant communicator and an empathetic leader," says Prof Michael Baker from Otago University's Public Health Department, who helped advise the government on its response. "But what she's said also made sense and I think people really trusted that. There's been a high level of compliance."

For a pandemic response to be effective, he says, "science and leadership have to go together".

In New Zealand, that scientific insight has come through Director-General of Health Ashley Bloomfield, who has stood alongside Ms Ardern at her daily press conferences.

"From the outset he has carefully and calmly communicated many complex health issues around Covid-19 paving the way for government decisions," says Sarah Robson, a senior journalist at Radio New Zealand.

"Because he had clearly communicated the trajectory we were on in terms of the increase in the number of cases, when Jacinda Ardern said we were going into lockdown, people understood why."

Shaun Hendy, professor at the Faculty of Science at Auckland University, says this strong working relationship with the science community has put New Zealand at an advantage compared with countries which "have had difficult relationships with their science community in recent times".

"This seems to have led to a much less functional science advice system, where scientists feel they have little influence and are likely to be ignored," Prof Hendy says.

'Be strong, be kind'
But similar to the time of the mass shootings in Christchurch, it's her leadership style that's caught particular global attention.

While telling the public in detail the rules of the lockdown and the trajectory of the new cases, Ms Ardern has also focused on kindness.

She has ended almost all her public appearances with the same message: "Be Strong. Be Kind".

After she announced the lockdown, the prime minister went on to Facebook Live, saying she wanted to "check in with everyone" as they prepared to hunker down.

She's regularly been on Facebook, casually dressed, always smiling and sharing slivers of her personal life, but never underplaying the seriousness of the situation while answering people's questions.

The overwhelming response in New Zealand has been public praise for her manner and steadfastness.

"Every decision is made with the disclaimer that she knows how difficult it's going to be for people," Thomas Weston, an Auckland-based insurance administrator, told the BBC.

"It's delivered with kindness but also very decisive. It's clear what we can and can't do."

In that vein, the prime minister recently announced she, ministers in her cabinet and public service chief executives would take a 20% pay cut for the next six months, to recognise the impact on other New Zealanders.

Dr Siouxie Wiles, Associate Professor at the University of Auckland, has also been advising the government, as well as regularly updating the New Zealand public on the latest virus research.

A lack of transparency?

Key to New Zealand's response to Covid-19, Dr Wiles argues, was that the prime minister and government visibly put people's health first, whereas other countries which delayed imposed social distancing measures for fear of the economic damage are now having a much harder time controlling the virus.

"Surely, a dead or a dying population is bad for the economy," she says.

Despite wide praise for the government's response, some journalists have criticised its daily Covid-19 briefings for not allowing enough time to ask questions, seek additional clarity on information or challenge the statements made.

Michael Morrah is an investigative journalist for the television news outlet, Newshub. He says some of the questions he's emailed to health ministry's communications team have gone unanswered while others took days to get a response.

"Getting clear, timely answers to questions has frequently been an arduous and deeply frustrating process," he says. He adds that government reassurances over the availability of PPE contradicts evidence he has heard from frontline healthcare workers.

There has also been criticism over the relative lack of clarity around some of the big virus clusters which make up the bulk of New Zealand's cases, especially where the origin of cases it not clear.

Observers have said these significant clusters - with more than 230 unknown-origin cases - show a weak contact-tracing system, which many argue is essential for containing the virus.

Prof Hendy says any lack of transparency seemed to stem from the health system being under-prepared for dealing with information flows in a nationwide emergency, rather than from any intent to disguise shortcomings.

"New Zealand is a spread country with a low population density and a decentralised healthcare system. It's a challenge for contact tracing," he says.

The government is now putting an extra $55m into its contact tracing operation, and it hopes it will soon be able to trace 5,000 contacts a day. It also has only eight cases now with no proven connection to other cases.

New Zealanders will begin moving out of the most severe lockdown level next Tuesday, with a partial reopening of schools and businesses and a slight easing of movement, but the prime minister has said the sacrifices made so far cannot be wasted by rushing to open up the economy too soon.

Professor Baker says the ultimate aim is to eradicate Covid-19 not just suppress it. China is the only other country working to that ambition.

"The reason we know it works is because China has done it," Professor Baker adds. "1.4 billion people haven't got the virus. They have been protected from it.

"If China can protect a population of that scale, surely New Zealand can protect five million people."

Ms Ardern said on Monday that she had taken a phone call about each one of the 12 New Zealanders who have died, saying: "We may be among the few countries where that's still able to happen."

She gives the credit for the country's success to medical staff and the way the public have supported the rules of the lockdown, telling them: "New Zealanders have proven themselves, and they've done so in the most incredible way."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-52344299
 
Everyone wants to know how well their country is tackling coronavirus, compared with others. But you have to make sure you're comparing the same things.

The United States, for example, has far more Covid-19 deaths than any other country - as of 20 April, a total of over 40,000 deaths.

But the US has a population of 330 million people.

If you take the five largest countries in Western Europe - the UK, Germany, France, Italy and Spain - their combined population is roughly 320 million.

And the total number of registered coronavirus deaths from those five countries, as of 20 April, was over 85,000 - more than twice that of the US.

So, individual statistics don't tell the full story.

For comparisons to be useful, says Rowland Kao, professor of data science at the University of Edinburgh, there are two broad issues to consider.

"Does the underlying data mean the same thing? And does it make sense to compare two sets of numbers if the epidemiology [all the other factors surrounding the spread of the disease] is different?"

Counting deaths
Let's look at some of the numbers first. There are differences in how countries record Covid-19 deaths.

France, for example, includes deaths in care homes in the headline numbers it produces every day, but the daily figures for England only include deaths in hospitals.

After criticism, the government's chart now has a line for deaths in hospitals and a line for all deaths (including in care homes) - but there is a time lag on this last set of figures.

There's also no accepted international standard for how you measure deaths, or their causes.

Does somebody need to have been tested for coronavirus to count towards the statistics, or are the suspicions of a doctor enough? Does the virus need to be the main cause of death, or does any mention on a death certificate count?

Are you really comparing like with like?

Death rates
There is a lot of focus on death rates, but there are different ways of measuring them too.

One is the ratio of deaths to confirmed cases - of all the people who test positive for coronavirus, how many go on to die?

But different countries are testing in very different ways. The UK has mainly tested people who are ill enough to be admitted to hospital. That can make the death rate appear much higher than in a country which had a wider testing programme.

The more testing a country carries out, the more it will find people who have coronavirus with only mild symptoms, or perhaps no symptoms at all.

So, the death rate in confirmed cases is not the same as the overall death rate.

Another measurement is how many deaths have occurred compared with the size of a country's population - the numbers of deaths per million people, for example.

But that is determined partly by what stage of the outbreak an individual country has reached. If a country's first case was early in the global outbreak, then it has had longer for its death toll to grow.

The UK government compares how each country has done since recording its 50th death, but even that poses some problems.

A country that reaches 50 deaths later should have had more time to prepare for the virus and reduce the eventual death toll.

When studying these comparisons, it is also worth remembering that the vast majority of people who get infected with coronavirus will recover.

Political factors

It is more difficult to have confidence in data which comes from countries with tightly controlled political systems.

Is the number of deaths recorded so far in countries like China or Iran accurate? We don't really know.

Calculated as a number of deaths per million of its population, China's figures are extraordinarily low, even after it revised upwards the death toll in Wuhan by 50%.

So, can we really trust the data?

Population factors
There are real differences in the populations in different countries. Demographics are particularly important - that's things like average age, or where people live.

Comparisons have been made between the UK and the Republic of Ireland, but they are problematic. Ireland has a much lower population density, and a much larger percentage of people live in rural areas.

It makes more sense to compare Dublin City and County with an urban area in the UK of about the same size (like Merseyside) than to try to compare the two countries as a whole.

You also need to make sure you are comparing like with like in terms of age structure.

A comparison of death rates between countries in Europe and Africa wouldn't necessarily work, because countries in Africa tend to have much younger populations.

We know that older people are much more likely to die of Covid-19.

Different health services

On the other hand, most European countries have health systems that are better funded than those in most African countries.

And that will also have an effect on how badly hit a country is by coronavirus, as will factors such as how easily different cultures adjust to social distancing.

Health systems obviously play a crucial role in trying to control a pandemic, but they are not all the same.

"Do people actively seek treatment, how easy is it to get to hospitals, do you have to pay to be treated well? All of these things vary from place to place," says Prof Andy Tatem, of the University of Southampton.

Another big factor is the level of comorbidity - this means the number of other conditions, such as diabetes, heart disease or high blood pressure - which people may already have when they get infected.

Testing

Countries that did a lot of testing early in the pandemic, and followed it up by tracing the contacts of anyone who was infected, seem to have been most successful in slowing the spread of the disease so far.

Both Germany and South Korea have had far fewer deaths than the worst affected countries.

The number of tests per head of population may be a useful statistic to predict lower fatality rates.

But not all testing data is the same - some countries record the number of people tested, while others record the total number of tests carried out (many people need to be tested more than once to get an accurate result).

The timing of testing, and whether tests took place mostly in hospitals or in the community, also need to be taken into account.

Germany and South Korea tested aggressively very early on, and learned a lot more about how the virus was spreading.

What can the UK learn from Germany on testing?

But Italy, which has also done a lot of tests, has suffered a relatively high numbers of deaths. Italy only substantially increased its capacity for testing after the pandemic had already taken hold. The UK is doing the same thing.

Comparisons are difficult

So, is anything useful likely to emerge from all these comparisons?

"What you want to know is why one country might be doing better than another, and what you can learn from that," says Prof Jason Oke from the University of Oxford.

"And testing seems to be the most obvious example so far."

But until this the outbreak is over it won't be possible to know for sure which countries have dealt with the virus better.

"That's when we can really learn the lessons for next time," says Prof Oke.
https://www.bbc.com/news/52311014
 
It has to be Hong Kong. We only have had 1000 cases with only 3 deaths despite the fact that we are a part of China and there is a huge movement of goods and people between Hong Kong and China every day!

The success lies in comprehensive and thorough social distancing measures and a robust medical system.

All public parks, BBQ sites, swimming pools and have been closed. Patrons in restaurants are made to sit 1.8 meters apart from each other with the police going around in restaurant with measuring tapes and enforcing the rule and fining those who did not follow.

All schools have been suspended since 2nd February.
 
A country that you won't expect but has managed the pandemic very well despite a lack of resources is Greece.
 
The first case of Covid-19 outside China was announced in Thailand on 13 January. The prediction was that this region, with huge numbers of Chinese visitors, would be among the worst affected. But that has not happened.

Vietnam is the standout success with only 268 cases and no deaths. The communist party leadership recognised the threat very early, declaring in late January the need to fight the virus like a war, and deploying propaganda reminiscent of the conflict with the US to get the public on board. Vietnam was also ruthless in quarantining entire districts where the virus was detected. It has limited healthcare resources and lacks the testing capacity of advanced economies like South Korea. Vietnam’s achievement is likely down to containing Covid-19 early, and using an intrusive state apparatus effectively.

Thailand’s Covid-19 numbers are also strikingly low, fewer than 3,000, with just 49 deaths. Thailand too is unable to test widely. Only 140,000 have been conducted since January. Health officials say mass testing would be too expensive. But Thailand also got its population on board very early with measures like facemasks. It has been able to isolate and trace contacts for identified cases, and has a network of one million health volunteers across the country.

Infections - and deaths - are rising quickly in Indonesia, where measures have been minimal. In Myanmar, which has a testing capacity of just 300 a day, there are fears the official Covid-19 number is far too low.

But none of these countries has levels anywhere near those in Europe and the US. Health experts aren’t sure why. Weather may play a part, as may social behaviour. It is probably too soon to know whether South East Asia will escape the terrible scenes witnessed at hospitals in Italy and New York.
 
One way to check is which country has done how many test for each million of the population. Higher the numbers better has been the job done by the country. Its also depends upon the money and resources.

tests/million

USA: 13,067 Total cases :848,994 Deaths : 47,676

Italy : 25,028

Germany: 24,738

UK: 8,248

UAE: 79,875 Total cases: 8238 Deaths : 52

Iceland: 130,312; Total cases: 1785: Deaths : 10

India : 335 Total Case :21,370 Deaths : 681

Pakistan: 534 Total cases :10,076 Deaths : 212

Bahrain: 57,474 Total Cases : 2027 Deaths : 7

Iceland is the clear winner.

Pakistan has done more tests per Million of the population than India .
 
With no new cases in seven days the Vietnamese authorities have announced they will start easing the lockdown in most of the country from today. There have been only 268 confirmed infections and no deaths.

How did they do it?

Vietnam acted with speed when the first Covid-19 cases were reported in late January, stopping flights, closing the border with China, and launching a nationwide information campaign, with slick video messages and posters reminiscent of the heroic style used in the Vietnam War. It is a one-party, communist state with an efficient local administration and intrusive security apparatus, able to enforce quarantine even on entire districts to stop them spreading.

It has been unable to replicate the mass testing carried out by Germany and South Korea; its health system is poorly resourced, and would have been quickly overwhelmed by a more serious outbreak.

But Vietnam has shown that political will, a well-organised state and a compliant public have been sufficient to spare the country from the worst effects of the coronavirus.
 
South East Asia, New Zealand and Australia have all done an amazing job.

Germany has been quite good too.
 
Why do female leaders seem to be more successful at managing the coronavirus crisis? Plenty of countries with male leaders have also done well. But few with female leaders have done badly, write my colleagues John Henley and Eleanor Ainge Roy.

Jacinda Ardern, 39, New Zealand’s prime minister, has held Kiwis’ hands through the lockdown, delivering empathetic “stay home, save lives” video messages from her couch and communicating daily through non-combative press conferences or intimate Facebook Live videos, her favourite medium.

In Germany, Angela Merkel has been hailed for direct but uncharacteristically personal public interventions, warning that up to 70% of people would contract the virus – the country’s “greatest challenge” since 1945 – and lamenting every death as that of “a father or grandfather, a mother or grandmother, a partner …”

Taiwan’s president Tsai Ing-wen responded equally fast, activating the country’s central epidemic command centre in early January and introducing travel restrictions and quarantine measures. Mass public hygiene measures were rolled out, including disinfecting public areas and buildings.

Source Guardian.
 
One country that's been in the news for doing more than just "flattening" the curve is New Zealand.

It says it has stopped community transmission, and with just one case reported on Sunday, Prime Minister Jacinda Adern said the virus was "currently" eliminated.

Fewer than 1,500 people have been infected among New Zealand's nearly five million population - and only 19 have died.

So how did New Zealand get to where it is now? Some experts point to it making an earlier start. Adern announced strict lockdown measures in March - when only about 100 people had tested positive and no one had yet died.

The country's geography has also played a role in its success. A relatively small country, New Zealand has more control over who can come in than a larger country with more porous borders.

But many experts have attributed its main success to the clarity of the message coming from the government. Unlike nations that declared "war on Covid-19", the New Zealand government message was that of a country coming together. It urged people to "Unite Against Covid-19". Ardern has repeatedly called the country "our team of five million".

"Jacinda [Ardern] is a brilliant communicator and an empathetic leader," Prof Michael Baker from Otago University told the BBC.
 
One country that's been in the news for doing more than just "flattening" the curve is New Zealand.

It says it has stopped community transmission, and with just one case reported on Sunday, Prime Minister Jacinda Adern said the virus was "currently" eliminated.

Fewer than 1,500 people have been infected among New Zealand's nearly five million population - and only 19 have died.

So how did New Zealand get to where it is now? Some experts point to it making an earlier start. Adern announced strict lockdown measures in March - when only about 100 people had tested positive and no one had yet died.

The country's geography has also played a role in its success. A relatively small country, New Zealand has more control over who can come in than a larger country with more porous borders.

But many experts have attributed its main success to the clarity of the message coming from the government. Unlike nations that declared "war on Covid-19", the New Zealand government message was that of a country coming together. It urged people to "Unite Against Covid-19". Ardern has repeatedly called the country "our team of five million".

"Jacinda [Ardern] is a brilliant communicator and an empathetic leader," Prof Michael Baker from Otago University told the BBC.

Its easier to control when you have a small population of 5 million, no land borders, educated and more wealthier population and a good healthcare.
 
75% of New Zealand economy re-opens

New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern is speaking now about the country’s lifting of its most extreme restrictions.

Today, 400,000 Kiwis will return to work, and takeaway food services will re-open.

But she said that New Zealanders should be more cautious than ever, due to the virus’s incubation period

“It can take from two to 10 days for people to have been exposed to Covid-19 to come down with symptoms. That means we would not smell the smoke for a few weeks and that could put us back where we started before the lockdown.

“With more people going back to work today, we need to be even more vigilant.”

“Level three will see 400,000 more New Zealanders back at work, taking the total to 1 million Kiwis working. At level three, 75% of the economy is working, with building and construction, forestry, manufacturing and contactless retail starting up, major infrastructure projects start again today.”
 
'Won that battle': NZ takes first steps out of virus lockdown

New Zealand has begun a phased exit from its coronavirus lockdown - on of the most stringent imposed anywhere in the world - with Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern claiming the country scored a significant victory against the disease.

After nearly five weeks at the maximum Level Four restrictions - with only essential services operating - the country moved to Level Three late on Monday night.

"There is no widespread, undetected community transmission in New Zealand," Ardern declared. "We have won that battle."

About 400,000 people returned to work on Tuesday morning, as the move to Level Three, allowed some businesses to reopen, schools to resume classes for some children and delivery and takeaway food outlets to open their doors.

However, Ardern warned there was no certainty about when all transmission would be eliminated, allowing a return to normal life. Strict social distancing remains in force.

Everyone wants to "bring back the social contact that we all miss, but to do it confidently we need to move slowly and we need to move cautiously".

"I will not risk the gains we've made in the health of New Zealanders. So if we need to remain at Level Three, we will."

New Zealand is home to about five million people and reported only one new case of COVID-19 in the 24 hours ahead of the relaxation, taking the total to 1,122 cases and 19 deaths. Three new cases were reported on Tuesday morning.

The loosening of the restrictions triggered an early morning rush for burgers, fries and coffee, with long queues of cars appearing outside outlets of fastfood chain McDonald's hours before they were due to open, according to the New Zealand Herald.

New Zealand imposed the lockdown in late March closing its borders, shutting down all non-essential businesses and services, and telling people to stay at home - unless for a short walk around the neighbourhood or to visit the supermarket for supplies.

Under Level Three, people are still being urged to stay at home when they are not at work, school or getting food and other essentials. Strict social distancing remains in force, and police will be on the look out for large groups of people.

Ardern is expected to speak to the media later on Tuesday to assess the transition from Level 4 to Level 3, and provide an outline of the government's plans going forward.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...xit-coronavirus-lockdown-200427190321053.html
 
New Zealand. As if Jacinda Ardern couldn't be more widely admired around the world before. Seems to be doing everything right.
 
After aggressive mass testing, Vietnam says it contains coronavirus outbreak

HANOI (Reuters) - Businessman Phan Quoc Viet was making his usual prayers at a pagoda in Tay Ninh, a province in southern Vietnam, when the government official’s call came.

It was late January, just after the Lunar New Year. Vietnam had detected its first two cases of the new coronavirus days earlier, and the government was contacting companies with experience of medical testing for urgent help.

“The official said Vietnam needed to act quickly,” said Viet, whose medical equipment company, Viet A Corp, makes test kits and has been central to Vietnam ramping up its testing programme in response to the outbreak.

Vietnam, a country of 96 million people which shares a border with China, is signalling that it has succeeded where many wealthier and more developed countries have not by containing the new coronavirus.

The government is officially reporting a relatively small 270 cases and zero deaths. That puts the country on course to revive its economy much sooner than most others, according to several public health experts interviewed by Reuters.

Its slightly more populous regional neighbour the Philippines, in comparison, has reported almost 30 times as many cases and more than 500 deaths. For an interactive graphic tracking the global spread, click tmsnrt.rs/3aIRuz7

These public health experts say Vietnam was successful because it made early, decisive moves to restrict travel into the country, put tens of thousands of people into quarantine and quickly scaled up the use of tests and a system to track down people who might have been exposed to the virus.

“The steps are easy to describe but difficult to implement, yet they’ve been very successful at implementing them over and over again,” said Matthew Moore, a Hanoi-based official from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), who has been liaising with Vietnam’s government on the outbreak since early January. He added that the CDC has “great confidence” in the Vietnamese government’s response to the crisis.

Vietnam increased the number of laboratories that can test for COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus, from three at the beginning of the outbreak in January, to 112 by April.

As of Wednesday, 213,743 tests had been conducted in Vietnam, of which 270 were positive, according to health ministry data.

That ratio of 791 tests to every confirmed case is by far the highest in the world, according to data from health ministries compiled by Reuters. The next highest, Taiwan, has conducted 140 tests for every case. To see results by country, click tmsnrt.rs/3bO6dsK

Reuters could not independently verify the accuracy of the government’s testing data. The Vietnamese government did not reply to questions about its data and the extent of its awareness of virus-related cases. The two officials leading the country’s efforts against the virus were not made available for interviews to answer questions about their work.

Kidong Park, the World Health Organization’s representative in Vietnam, said there was no indication of any outbreaks beyond what had been reported by the government.

Vietnam has been helped, experts said, by the combination of its authoritarian leadership and its open market economy, and a population with a memory of previous epidemics ready to cooperate.

“It is organised, it can make country-wide policy decisions that get enacted quickly and efficiently and without too much controversy,” said Guy Thwaites, director of the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit in Ho Chi Minh City. Thwaites’s laboratory has been helping to process tests.

Thwaites said the number of positive tests processed by his organisation’s lab was in line with government data. He said the hospital where he works on the wards – Ho Chi Minh City’s 550-bed Hospital for Tropical Diseases, serving a population of 45 million people in southern Vietnam – had not admitted any additional cases not reflected in the government’s numbers.

“If there was ongoing and unreported or unappreciated community transmission, we would have seen the patients in our hospital. We have not,” he said. Thwaites said his organisation’s lab increased capacity from being able to do around 100 tests a day to around 1,000 a day.

Managers of 13 funeral homes in Hanoi contacted by Reuters said they had seen no uptick in deaths. One said requests for funerals had gone down during the country’s lockdown, now lifted, because of the reduction in traffic accidents, one of the biggest killers in Vietnam.

Todd Pollack, a Hanoi-based infectious diseases specialist at Harvard Medical School, said that less than 10% of the people who tested positive for the virus in Vietnam were over 60 – the age group most likely to die from COVID-19. All patients, he added, were closely monitored in health facilities and given good medical care. Pollack said a good comparison to Vietnam was South Korea, another country which managed to roll out a large testing programme and keep deaths relatively low.

“The case fatality rate in South Korea is around 2%, in part because they are testing so widely,” said Pollack. “If we apply that rate to Vietnam’s number of confirmed cases, and consider these other factors, we can understand how they have avoided any deaths so far.”

Krutika Kuppalli, an infectious disease physician and biosecurity fellow at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, said: “There is no way to possibly know for certain, but they have done a great job with their response, with the testing and isolating and quarantining people.”

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP

In late February, as U.S. President Donald Trump was still downplaying the dangers of the new coronavirus, Viet and his colleagues began sourcing crucial components needed to mass produce COVID-19 testing kits from the United States and Germany.

Researchers at Vietnam’s state-run Military Medical University, working with Viet A Corp, had already designed a test kit, and the government handed a license to the private company to mass produce the kit. Viet said his company’s kits – which can perform multiple tests – had now provided 250,000 tests in Vietnam and had exported kits with capacity for 20,000 tests.

As early as Jan. 23, Vietnam suspended flights to and from the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the outbreak started, immediately after discovering its first two cases. It acted even though the WHO was at that point advising against travel restrictions. A week after that, Vietnam effectively closed its 1,400-km (870-mile) border with China to all but essential trade.

By mid-March, Vietnam made the wearing of masks in public places mandatory nationwide, well ahead of most other countries and not heeding the WHO’s advice that only people with symptoms should wear them. Some of Vietnam’s garment factories turned to making surgical and cloth masks to meet demand.

The WHO said that in April it had published advice on non-medical mask wearing in situations where social distancing cannot be avoided, but said medical masks must be prioritised for health care workers.

MASS QUARANTINE
Vietnam’s testing ramp-up took place in tandem with a thorough contact-tracing programme and the quarantine of tens of thousands of people, many of them overseas Vietnamese returning home to escape worsening outbreaks in Europe and the United States.

Viet A Corp’s tests were first put into use on March 4, Viet told Reuters. In the six weeks prior to that, the country had gradually increased testing, but the number of people with the virus remained below 20. In the second week of March, that number more than doubled.

In early March, only a fraction of the tens of thousands of arrivals in the military-run quarantine centres set up to house them were tested for the virus, according to health ministry data. But by early April, testing numbers began to surpass the number of those in quarantine.

Medical officials tested and retested suspected cases, gradually discharging from quarantine those who tested negative several times. Many tests were also made on groups of people not in quarantine who may have been exposed to the virus.

The country’s swift response does not appear to have been hampered by the retirement of its health minister in November. The interim replacement, Deputy Prime Minister Vu Duc Dam, a Communist Party official with no experience of public health, has emerged as a hero on social media for his role leading Vietnam’s coronavirus task force.

Neither Dam nor Deputy Health Minister Nguyen Thanh Long was made available for an interview.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vietnam-fight-insi-idUSKBN22B34H
 
Earlier we reported that the number of people confirmed to have recovered from the virus had passed one million, according to Johns Hopkins University in the US.

Below are the countries which according to Johns Hopkins have recorded the highest number of people recovering.

The US has had the most recoveries from Covid-19 - but has also had the largest number of cases.

US 153,947 (from a total of 1,070,026 cases)
Germany 123,500 (163,009 cases)
Spain 112,050 (213,435 cases)
China 78,523 (83,956 cases)
Italy 75,945 (205,463 cases)
But these figures come with caveats attached.

Firstly, they probably underestimate the true number of people who have recovered because many infections are mild and go unrecorded. The extent of testing also varies widely between countries.

Different countries may also record data about who has recovered in different ways.

With that said, Johns Hopkins says there has been a total of 1,014,931 recoveries from Covid-19 worldwide.

The UK is shown to have recorded only 859 recoveries from 172,481 confirmed cases of the virus.

However, that is likely to be a significant underestimate of the true figure. On Thursday, there were 15,043 people in hospital with coronavirus, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said.
 
Sweden and New Zealand.

Sweden for not destroying its economy and NZ for the way it eliminated.
 
New Zealand, despite its size, has done an admirable job of pretty much eliminating the virus.
 
With testing, Iceland claims major success against COVID-19

HVAMMSTANGI, Iceland (AP) — Winter storms isolated the northern village of Hvammstangi from the rest of Iceland. Then spring brought the coronavirus, isolating villagers from each other. Now, as summer approaches, residents hope life is getting back to some kind of normal.

High schools, hair salons, dentists and other businesses across Iceland are reopening Monday after six weeks of lockdown, after this North Atlantic nation managed to tame its coronavirus outbreak.

Iceland has confirmed 1,799 cases of the virus, but just 10 people have died. The number of new COVID-19 cases each day has fallen from 106 at the peak of the outbreak to single digits — even, on some days, zero.

“I didn’t expect the recovery to be this fast,” said Iceland’s chief epidemiologist, Thorolfur Gudnason.

Iceland’s success is partly testament to its tiny population — just 360,000 people. But it also reflects decisive action by authorities, who used a rigorous policy of testing and tracking to find and isolate infected people, even when they had no symptoms.

That has helped Iceland weather the pandemic without resorting to the near-total social and economic shutdowns enforced in many other European countries. Infected people and their contacts were quarantined, but the rest of the population was not forced to stay inside, only to be careful.

A volcanic island nudging the Arctic Circle, Iceland may be remote, but it is far from isolated. Its Keflavik Airport is a trans-Atlantic hub, and Icelanders are enthusiastic travelers. As in several other European countries, some of the first cases of the virus here were brought back from ski resorts in the Alps, including the Austrian village of Ischgl.

Early vigilance was key to Iceland’s success. The country confirmed its first case of the virus on Feb. 28, and declared Ischgl a high-risk zone on March 5, two days before authorities there confirmed the first case.

Gudnason said Iceland had been updating and testing its response to a global pandemic since 2004. Hospitals had been testing people arriving from abroad for a month before the first confirmed case, and a media campaign urged hand washing and social distancing.

“Each institution involved in the response knew its role from the start,” he said.

Iceland quarantined everyone returning from virus hotspots and began test-and-trace measures to locate and isolate every case. Bigger countries such as Britain took the same approach, at first. But the U.K. abandoned test-and-trace in March as the number of cases overwhelmed the country’s testing capacity. More than a month later and with almost 30,000 Britons dead, the U.K. is scrambling to resume testing and tracing as part of its route out of national lockdown.

Iceland’s testing capacity was helped by the presence of Reykjavik-based biopharmaceutical company deCODE Genetics, which early in the outbreak teamed up with health authorities to ramp up public testing.

Over six weeks, Iceland managed to test almost 50,000 people, more than 13 percent of the population, the biggest chunk of any country in the world.

DeCODE did not test people already feeling sick or in quarantine, who were tested in hospitals. The company used its facilities to test a cross-section of the population, and identified scores of new cases, including people with mild or no symptoms.

Kari Stefansson, deCODE’s ebullient CEO, said the approach showed that “with the use of modern science, even an epidemic like this one can be contained.”

Iceland’s testing yielded new leads for scientists about how the virus behaves. Early results suggested 0.6 percent of the population were “silent carriers” of the disease with no symptoms or only a mild cough and runny nose.

Preliminary research suggests one-third of those who tested positive at deCODE infected someone around them, providing evidence that silent carriers do transmit the disease but much less than symptomatic patients.

In a random sample of 848 children under the age of 10 none of them tested positive, which guided Icelandic authorities’ decision to keep schools open for children under 16.

Alongside the testing, civil defense authorities set up a Contact Tracing Team, including police officers and university students, which used legwork and phone calls to identify people who had come into contact with infected individuals. A mobile phone tracing app was up and running a few weeks later.

Gudnason said the approach’s success is shown by the fact that about 60% of people who tested positive were already in quarantine after being contacted by the tracing team.

Altogether, 19,000 people were ordered into two-week quarantine. Everyone else carried on with a semblance of normality. Primary schools remained open, and some cafes and restaurants kept operating, following social distancing rules: no more than 20 people gathered at once and everyone 2 meters (6.5 feet) apart.

Starting Monday, gatherings of up to 50 will be permitted, high schools and colleges can resume classes and all businesses except bars, gyms and swimming pools can reopen.

The entire country, however, must self-isolate from the rest of the world for the time being. Everyone arriving from abroad faces a 14-day quarantine.

That means a bleak economic outlook for a country that depends on tourism. On Road Number One, the “Ring Road” looping through Iceland’s coastal towns and villages, the Associated Press passed empty vista points and few cars.

“Business can only go up from here,” said Margrét Guðjónsdóttir, 28, working alone at the roadstop in Hvammstangi.

The village, population 600, was hit badly early on. The town ended up having 26 confirmed cases of the virus, and was put under lockdown for a week while the transmission was being mapped out.

The local grocery store created “shifts” for customers so they could shop while socially isolating. In an April snowstorm, local search and rescue volunteers used their super-jeeps to drive hospital staff to and from work and shuttled warm meals to elderly residents around town.

“Making each other’s lockdown a little more pleasant became people’s mission,” Guðjónsdóttir said. “It really showed me the benefit of living in a small community.”
 
New Zealand to reopen malls, cinemas and other businesses from Thursday

After more than a month of strict restrictions on movement, New Zealand has decided to reopen businesses including malls, cinemas, cafes and gyms from Thursday, Reuters reported.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the staggered move from "level 4" to “level 2” restrictions will mean retail, restaurants and other public spaces including playgrounds can reopen from Thursday. Schools can open from next Monday while bars can only reopen from May 21, Ardern said. Gatherings would be limited to 10 people.
 
Among the South Asian countries, Sri Lanka has handled it the best.

Only around 800 cases yet, with 8 deaths. Everyone else has been a lot worse.
 
Last edited:
Sweden - as Herd immunity was the best approach. The lock down has caused massive damage for small business owners. This is not sustainable, and its good thing the lock down is ending.
 
Second wave 'highly unlikely' in Denmark

Denmark was one of the first European nations to adopt lockdown measures, and one of the first to end them. Primary school pupils returned to class on 15 April, and hairdressers reopened just days later.

Now, the country has started to reopen restaurants and shopping malls, and has laid out new measures to track and trace infections.

Chief epidemiologist Kare Molbak told reporters that even with all the restrictions ending, infection rates remain low, and he didn't think a second wave would hit.

"No country has seen an actual second wave yet. Some countries have seen the spread go up and down," he said. "But with the knowledge we have today, I find it very unlikely that we'll see a second wave," he said.
 
Second wave 'highly unlikely' in Denmark

Denmark was one of the first European nations to adopt lockdown measures, and one of the first to end them. Primary school pupils returned to class on 15 April, and hairdressers reopened just days later.

Now, the country has started to reopen restaurants and shopping malls, and has laid out new measures to track and trace infections.

Chief epidemiologist Kare Molbak told reporters that even with all the restrictions ending, infection rates remain low, and he didn't think a second wave would hit.

"No country has seen an actual second wave yet. Some countries have seen the spread go up and down," he said. "But with the knowledge we have today, I find it very unlikely that we'll see a second wave," he said.

Denmark have gone quite under the radar, but they seem to be handling it remarkably.
 
As long as the virus is curbed throughout the world, no country is safe. Simple as that. Open international borders again and virus will start again.
 
In December 2019, the coronavirus was seemingly confined to China. But, a few weeks later, the virus, which causes the illness known as COVID-19, became a global pandemic.

The virus, which leads to a respiratory illness that can be transmitted from droplets of bodily fluids - such as mucus and saliva, has now been reported in at least 185 countries.=

Scientists, health officials and governments across the world have encouraged citizens to practise physical distancing and to avoid going out unless for necessary purposes.

According to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University, more than 4.2 million people have been infected, and the global death toll is more than 288,000. More than one million patients have recovered.

Here are a few countries that have not reported any cases of the coronavirus so far:

Kiribati

Lesotho

Marshall Islands

Micronesia

Nauru

North Korea

Palau

Samoa

Solomon Islands

Tonga

Turkmenistan

Tuvalu

Vanuatu

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/04/countries-reported-coronavirus-cases-200412093314762.html
 
Cinemas, museums and theatres reopen in Denmark

Many readers will feel a pang of envy when they see Denmark's gradual reopening under social distancing.

Museums, art galleries and zoos are all allowed to open their doors, as are cinemas and theatres. Denmark's TV2 says they'll even have an audience of family and friends for Friday's X Factor talent show finale.

The news comes amid dire predictions for the UK's theatre industry if no government rescue package is agreed. Top West End producer Sonia Friedman has talked of British theatre being on the brink of collapse.

Danish guidelines for seated audiences came out late on Thursday so here's a brief summary:

- Maximum audience of 500 in a hall
- Every other seat should be empty or the distance between each person should be 1m (3ft) - unless people have close contact every day
- There should be a distance of at least 2m between performer and audience
- In foyers there should also be social distancing

No deaths were reported by Denmark's SSI health institute on Friday - for the second time in a week.
 
Denmark once again far ahead of the curve and ahead of most countries.
 
New Zealand wins hands down!

==

New Zealand has no single active Covid-19 infection, officials said on Monday, after the last remaining patient recovered.

That's after more than two weeks of no new infections.

Later on Monday, the government of Jacinda Ardern will announce whether it'll remove the remaining social distancing restrictions.

New Zealand had one of the world's strictest lockdowns for weeks and successfully stopped the pandemic from escalating.

There have been 1,504 confirmed cases in New Zealand, and 22 deaths.
 
Thailand says it had no new virus infections or deaths over the past day - the first time in almost three weeks there were no new cases.

It's also been 17 days since a local transmission was recorded. All other recent cases had been imported by people returning from abroad.

The country's total stands at 3,125 confirmed infections, while 58 deaths have been linked to Covid-19.
 
Deaths per capita around the world

Following on from our post on the countries with the highest number of cases per capita, here are the countries with the highest numbers of deaths, relative to population size.

Not all countries record deaths in the same way. The data comes from the WHO dashboard.

1. San Marino - 1,235 deaths per million people

2. Belgium - 830

3. Andorra - 662

4. UK - 601

5. Spain - 580

6. Italy - 563

7. Sweden - 467

8. France - 448

9. Netherlands - 352

10. Ireland - 342

11. US - 335
==

Cases per capita around the world

As the US exceeds two million cases, it's worth remembering that its high total is partly down to widespread testing and a large population.

Using data from the WHO dashboard, the worst-affected countries relative to population size are as follows (note that many in the list have tiny populations, with only small outbreaks in total terms):

1. Qatar - 24,949 cases per million people

2. San Marino - 20,441

3. Vatican City - 14,545

4. Andorra - 11,065

5. Bahrain - 9,518

6. Kuwait - 7,759

7. Chile - 7,468

8. Singapore - 6,584

9. Luxembourg - 6,463

10. Peru - 6,057

11. US - 5,894
 
Back
Top