What's new

Who is behind the 'Free Karachi' campaign? [Ad appears in Washington Post]

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
5a625ae533ead.jpg


WASHINGTON: The United States has assured Pakistan that it does not support any group threatening the country’s territorial integrity, a traditional US position re-emphasised following a recent advertising campaign targeting Islamabad.

“We took it up with the State Department and they assured us that they continue to support Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity as strongly as they always have,” said Pakistan’s ambassador in Washington, Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhary.

He noted that during a recent visit to Islamabad, US Assistant Secretary of State Alice Wells gave a similar assurance to Pakistani officials, telling them that the “US considers Pakistan’s enemy as its own enemy”.

The ambassador said that some “negative posters and billboards” had appeared in New York, including some on cabs and were removed when Pakistan protested. Similar signs appeared on a few cabs in Washington, “but only for a short while”, he added.

Pakistan reacted strongly to the campaign, raising it with the State Department as well as with other US government agencies that assured Pakistan that the groups behind these campaigns had no support from any US agency. They were using the space provided by US freedom of expression laws to propagate their views, US officials added.

Similar advertisements had appeared in London and Geneva and Pakistan was able to get them removed.

Ambassador Chaudhary said people behind such campaigns had “no support, no voice”, either in Pakistan or abroad. “But there are unknown hands behind it, having their own agenda,” he said.

“[These] forces [are] not in this country [the United States] but linked to our eastern neighbours, as we saw in the recent past,” said Mr Chaudhary when asked to identify the hidden hand.

The ambassador pointed out that Balochistan had an elected government and there had been “unprecedented economic development” in the province, which “exposes the hollowness of the propaganda” conducted by these tiny groups on outside encouragement.

But a recent, anti-establishment campaign shows that the ongoing tension between the United States and Pakistan has created new space for such groups, who are now putting up billboards, posters and newspaper ads to project their views.

The campaign began with “Free Balochistan” signs on a number of yellow taxicabs — 100 according to the World Baloch Organisation — in New York last month. And it came to the US capital this week when “FreeKarachi” signs appeared on some Washington cabs.

On Thursday, a local newspaper — the Washington Times — distributed a wrap with its regular edition, repeating the demand for a “Free Karachi”.

The “Free Balochistan” campaign, which came to US cities from London and Geneva, was handled by a private advertising agency called Clear Channel Outdoor. But it’s not clear if the agency is also involved in the Karachi campaign.

“It’s very disturbing. Obviously, hiring a mainstream advertising agency requires a lot of money and somebody is providing that money,” said M. Ali, a Pakistani-American businessman who has been involved in charity campaigns.

“Charities are fine. But turning political grievances into a commercial campaign is dangerous. Anyone with funds can start a campaign. There’s no end to it,” he said. “There are many financers with grievances against various states.”

The advertising agency, when contacted by Dawn, refused to respond.

A press release from the so-called Free Karachi campaign claimed that Nadeem Nusrat, the US-based former convener of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-London is the main spokesperson for this campaign.

The group said it launched the campaign on Jan 15, when America observes the Martin Luther King Jr Day, to link it with the human rights champion.

The Washington Times wrap called for ending disappearances of political activists and alleged abuses of human rights in Pakistan. It also demanded justice for Prof Hasan Zafar Arif, identifying him as an MQM leader.

Talking to Pakistani journalists in New York, Nusrat said they were not demanding Karachi’s separation from the Pakistani state. “The campaign is against atrocities and abuses,” he claimed.

“We want this campaign of terror — not just against Muhajirs but [also] against the Baloch, Sindhis and other ethnic and religious minorities — to end.”

He claimed that if the rulers stopped terrorising people, “all groups, including Muhajirs and the Baloch, can be reunited with the mainstream”.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1384030/n...s-after-free-karachi-ads-appear-in-newspapers
 
https://www.dawn.com/news/1389718/steps-taken-to-counter-free-karachi-drive-senate-told

ISLAMABAD: Minister of State for Finance Rana Muhammad Afzal told the Senate on Thursday the government had reacted stro*ngly over the ongoing “Free Karachi” campaign in Washington, but the US laws did not provide it any forum to challenge such acts.

The minister, while responding on behalf of Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif to a calling-attention notice about the media campaign on US soil, said Islamabad had taken up the issue with Washington but “the situation is that under the cover of free speech and other such factors they have not really responded to us”.

Moreover, the minister said, “perpetrators of this game had acted very smartly” as they had written the words “Free Karachi and Free Balochistan” in big letters whereas in fine print below they had written the words “from atrocities and human rights violations”.

“So if you take them to court or to the State Department under the available laws, the whole text does not qualify” for any legal action and “the American laws do not provide us any legal forum where we can ask for implementation of certain laws and regulations”, he said.

PPP leader requests Senate chairman to announce his ruling on trichotomy of powers

“We know it is all India-sponsored and they are paying $3,000 per cab to put up such banners,” said Mr Afzal, adding that the US system only allowed them to react in the same manner.

So the Pakistani community had come forward and launched the “Free Kash*mir” and “Free Khalistan” campaigns there.

Previously anti-Pakistan campaigns had been launched in Switzerland and the UK and the Pakistan government had effectively taken up the issue with the governments of the two European countries.

Giving a policy statement on the US move, launched with the help of some European countries, to place Pakistan on the global terrorist-financing list, the finance minister said the government was “aggressively contesting” the move “which we feel is politically motivated”.

Mr Afzal said that Pakistan had done more than any other country to curb money laundering.

Meanwhile, PPP’s Farhatullah Babar urged Senate chairman Raza Rabbani to announce his ruling on the issue of trichotomy of powers that he had reserved after a comprehensive debate in which the members had expressed their apprehension over the shifting of power balance away from the elected parliament.

“Power is continuously shifting away from civilian structures of the state as invisible forces are relentlessly busy in rewriting the political and parliamentary narrative and it is critical that an appropriate ruling is announced to put on notice these elements ahead of the forthcoming Senate elections,” Mr Babar said while speaking on an issue of public importance.

Mr Rabbani said he had almost finalised his ruling and would announce it soon.

Earlier, responding to another calling attention notice on the halting of PIA’s flight operation to Kuwait and Oman, Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Sheikh Aftab Ahmed admitted that there had been no improvement in the financial position of the PIA.

He said the routes had been closed as the losses of the national flag carrier had increased manifold.

The PPP’s Sherry Rehman, who had raised the matter, said air traffic had swelled 40 per cent over the past five years to 20 million passengers and “it is shocking and disturbing to see PIA halting international flight routes.”

WALKOUT: The opposition members staged a token walkout to lodge their protest over the government’s decision to increase the prices of petroleum products.
 
lol

I guaranteee that not even a 1,000 people of the 20 million or so genuinely want independence for Karachi.

20-30% may want a new province perhaps but even that has died down in recent years
 
Definitely Altaf's right hand Nadeem Nusrat wit help of his Indian friends.

There is more chance of Free Delhi or Free Mumbai than Karachi but no harm in trying.
 
“We know it is all India-sponsored and they are paying $3,000 per cab to put up such banners,” said Mr Afzal, adding that the US system only allowed them to react in the same manner.

So the Pakistani community had come forward and launched the “Free Kash*mir” and “Free Khalistan” campaigns there.

I was about to feel happy until I learned Pakistanis wasted money on this ad campaign too.
 
Karachi will be the last place to seek independence from Pakistan.... Those behind this move don't have two brain cells put together.
 
Definitely Altaf's right hand Nadeem Nusrat wit help of his Indian friends.

There is more chance of Free Delhi or Free Mumbai than Karachi but no harm in trying.

One wonders why the MQM, which is supposed to hate India with a passion, suddenly has 'Indian friends'.
 
Indian propaganda. Pakistan needs to step up the counter propaganda, the washignton post and most fake media sites are raging this propaganda war with India.
 
One wonders why the MQM, which is supposed to hate India with a passion, suddenly has 'Indian friends'.

Why is mqm supposed to hate india with a passion?

lol there are allegations that they are indian agents.
 
Why is mqm supposed to hate india with a passion?

lol there are allegations that they are indian agents.

Because the MQM is made of Mohajirs, who were the first Indian Muslims to adopt Pakistan as homeland and migrate there.

You don't expect them to love India, much less, take Indian help to undermine Pakistan, a country they fought hard to create and migrated to with a lot of hope.

Which makes me believe that all this talk of them being Indian agents is just plain rubbish.
 
Because the MQM is made of Mohajirs, who were the first Indian Muslims to adopt Pakistan as homeland and migrate there.

You don't expect them to love India, much less, take Indian help to undermine Pakistan, a country they fought hard to create and migrated to with a lot of hope.

Which makes me believe that all this talk of them being Indian agents is just plain rubbish.

you do know that ALL Mohajirs dont think same way. it certainly isnt rubbish allegation though. exaggerated prolly
 
Lols, Karachi is like heart of Pakistan.
 
Because the MQM is made of Mohajirs, who were the first Indian Muslims to adopt Pakistan as homeland and migrate there.

You don't expect them to love India, much less, take Indian help to undermine Pakistan, a country they fought hard to create and migrated to with a lot of hope.

Which makes me believe that all this talk of them being Indian agents is just plain rubbish.

That's like saying all Italian Americans are in the mafia, that's so dumb.
 
That's like saying all Italian Americans are in the mafia, that's so dumb.

Wrong analogy.

Unlike India and Pakistan, Italy and America were never on the two sides of a partition, and unlike the mohajirs in Pakistan, Italian -Americans did not migrate as a result of the partition.

I thought the one thing that united the mohajirs was the idea of Pakistan, which is why it is surprising that some of them must talk of seccession, and worse, take help from India for it.
 
Wrong analogy.

Unlike India and Pakistan, Italy and America were never on the two sides of a partition, and unlike the mohajirs in Pakistan, Italian -Americans did not migrate as a result of the partition.

I thought the one thing that united the mohajirs was the idea of Pakistan, which is why it is surprising that some of them must talk of seccession, and worse, take help from India for it.

My point is that no one community is a monolith, they all have a diversity of opinions. Even within the same family people can hold vastly different views and opinions, your. opinion is ovwr simplifying and generalizing things.
 
Wrong analogy.

Unlike India and Pakistan, Italy and America were never on the two sides of a partition, and unlike the mohajirs in Pakistan, Italian -Americans did not migrate as a result of the partition.

I thought the one thing that united the mohajirs was the idea of Pakistan, which is why it is surprising that some of them must talk of seccession, and worse, take help from India for it.

There is no demand for succession in Karachi. Not even within 0.01% of the population. Heck even if the rest of Pakistan declares independence, Karachi will still be a part of Pakistan.
 
Back
Top