What's new

Why is it that players involved in corruption are usually the best players in the team?

ExpressPacer

ODI Debutant
Joined
Aug 3, 2016
Runs
8,560
Post of the Week
1
I couldn't help but notice this. At least for Pakistan. We're always deprived of the best players that we have or who can play the game we need at the current moment. I'm not suggesting this is a conspiracy against Pakistan or anything of that sorts.

Earlier it was Amir, Asif and Butt. Asif was easily a future ATG at that time and one of the best bowlers in the world. Amir had just burst onto the scene, could swing it miles, bowled at express pace and was even a good batsman. All great cricketers of the past saw a future legend in him and what not. Even Butt, inferior of the two was a young batsman who had runs in Australia and was a great tactician and an excellent captain.

All of them were really good players. Now the fixers include:

- Sharjeel Khan: God. Was this guy a breath of fresh air or what.. During a time where Pakistan is plagued with slow players and accumalators who can't play quick (the modern game) to save their lives bursts onto the scene a huge batsman who hits sixes for one, plays express pace like its a club level bowler bowling, works on his spin game and smashes spinners and even gets runs in Australia and England, two of the toughest places to bat at even while the rest of the team struggles.

- Khalid Latif: One of the few guys in Pakistan who could hit the ball hard. Nobody in the current domestic setup has the strength to muscle the ball over the boundary.

- Shahzaib Hasan: This man had worked really hard on himself. Worked on his fitness. Worked on his game. Everything. The only player in the whole of Pakistan who was suited and accustomed to playing the modern game apart from Sharjeel and was on the verge of selection. Him and Sharjeel were going to be the perfect opening pair and a lot of PP'ers were waiting for this too.

So, when Pakistan was on its last legs sitting on the 9th rank, below Bangladesh, mostly because of their pathetic, slow, 70's style batting, they lose they only few batsmen that could take them forward. Why is it so?
Why is it usually the best players that fall to fixing?
 
Because fixing with crap players is useless, since they would not affect the game much.
 
Because fixing with crap players is useless, since they would not affect the game much.

It doesn't work like that. Most of the fixing these days are spot fixing for small, but multiple fun. You can only bet once on the match result, but these days addict people bet on almost every ball. It's like - 4th ball of 2nd over - 4 or not, 50K vs 1K; Sharjeel will score - over or under 35 ........ Often these small bets don't influence the direct result of the match (which will take almost entire team to be fixed ........ like the 90s situation).

Most cases, often the scouting is done at early stages of career on potential. Many of these players are not used for spot fixing once they are star, because of low stakes; rather they are kept to influence future recruits. I won't take any names, but be sure that Sharjeel (subject to proof) isn't the only here; rather he is the one on whom the bets will be higher.

PCB (or any cricket board) has to protect players at young age. For example, today Sakib earns over a million dollar/year - it's too costly to recruit him now; rather invest little on Miraj & Mosaddek & 5 years later, if they reach to Sakib's stature, they might get caught. But, if they are like Jamshed, it's better to feed them small amount & keep in the system.
 
Apart from Asif, none of those names are exactly stand outs. Amir may be but he has some way to go.

Butt wasn't the best batsman in the side at the time and was a pretty average captain tbh, not to mention Misbah took Pakistan to superior heights.

Sharjeel was def a breath of fresh air but in Babar we have our best ODI batsman and in Zaman a great new find.

Etc etc.

India, South Africa and Australia (covered up well) have had far bigger names involved in their match fixing/betting scandals.
 
Why would you pay a mediocre player to fix a match ? They quite very well would be failing to perform anyway
 
Back
Top