Will Britain-based PTI supporters forgive Rishi Sunak for his comments in the next elections?

[MenInG]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Imran Khan's arrest is Pakistan's internal matter, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak says <a href="https://t.co/W59tqlgI5I">pic.twitter.com/W59tqlgI5I</a></p>— Spriter (@Spriter99880) <a href="https://twitter.com/Spriter99880/status/1656284555869839361?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


So, he had a chance to condemn the loss of life and the way political rivals are being arbitrarily arrested in Pakistan but all he could say was this.

Question is, will UK based PTI supporters forgive him come next time he asks the Pakistani-origin voters to vote conservative?

 

[JaDed]

I didn’t think Pakistani Brits voted for conservatives.

 

[Minnowbasher]

Pakistani Brits do not vote for the Tories. I hope so anyway.
Hoping for a labour victory in the next election.

 

[Bewal Express]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Imran Khan's arrest is Pakistan's internal matter, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak says <a href="https://t.co/W59tqlgI5I">pic.twitter.com/W59tqlgI5I</a></p>— Spriter (@Spriter99880) <a href="https://twitter.com/Spriter99880/status/1656284555869839361?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 10, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


So, he had a chance to condemn the loss of life and the way political rivals are being arbitrarily arrested in Pakistan but all he could say was this.

Question is, will UK based PTI supporters forgive him come next time he asks the Pakistani-origin voters to vote conservative?

It's the type of mealy mouthed response you expect from him.

 

[MenInG]

It's the type of mealy mouthed response you expect from him.

Human rights abuses in Pakistan and he has nothing to say.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Human rights abuses in Pakistan and he has nothing to say.

Why will he involve UK into a quagmire? Its a political fight in Pakistan, no nation will try to get involved and burn their hands.

And i am surprised, but do pakistanis really want foreigners to poke their noses into Pakistan?

 

[MenInG]

Why will he involve UK into a quagmire? Its a political fight in Pakistan, no nation will try to get involved and burn their hands.

And i am surprised, but do pakistanis really want foreigners to poke their noses into Pakistan?

As a Western leader running around speaking about China/Ukraine, he should be concerned about Pakistan because there is a significant amount of Pakistani origin people in the UK

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Punjab Police torturing and beating up young boys for holding a PTI flag in their vehicle.<br><br>Is this any kind of a crime? Under which law ? <a href="https://t.co/s7uI4oUbRB">pic.twitter.com/s7uI4oUbRB</a></p>— Annus Raza (@annusraza) <a href="https://twitter.com/annusraza/status/1656893285137252354?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 12, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[cricketjoshila]

As a Western leader running around speaking about China/Ukraine, he should be concerned about Pakistan because there is a significant amount of Pakistani origin people in the UK

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Punjab Police torturing and beating up young boys for holding a PTI flag in their vehicle.<br><br>Is this any kind of a crime? Under which law ? <a href="https://t.co/s7uI4oUbRB">pic.twitter.com/s7uI4oUbRB</a></p>— Annus Raza (@annusraza) <a href="https://twitter.com/annusraza/status/1656893285137252354?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 12, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

In Russia Ukraine conflict he has a dog and he has picked a side.

Here he has no interest and he won't take a side, because of obvious reasons. While the odd MP may speak, he as a PM won't. This is geo politics and diplomacy.

 

[MenInG]

In Russia Ukraine conflict he has a dog and he has picked a side.

Here he has no interest and he won't take a side, because of obvious reasons. While the odd MP may speak, he as a PM won't. This is geo politics and diplomacy.

I agree.

Now upto Britain based Pakistanis to make themselves heard via their MPs in parliament on this issue.

 

[MenInG]

And some more for Rishi to check on

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Who are these armed people without uniform with Islamabad police, unleashing brutality? <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PakistanUnderFascism?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PakistanUnderFascism</a> <a href="https://t.co/hZICJfrIFV">pic.twitter.com/hZICJfrIFV</a></p>— PTI (@PTIofficial) <a href="https://twitter.com/PTIofficial/status/1657008208450404353?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 12, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[Varun]

These PTI supporters are the same ones who chose to spend 0% of their lives in Pakistan when Imran Khan is in power, and 100% of the time was spent in the UK under the likes of Boris Johnson.

They deserve Sunak or even Pol Pot as long as the benefits keep rolling in.

 

[MenInG]

These PTI supporters are the same ones who chose to spend 0% of their lives in Pakistan when Imran Khan is in power, and 100% of the time was spent in the UK under the likes of Boris Johnson.

They deserve Sunak or even Pol Pot as long as the benefits keep rolling in.

Would these be the same ones who are protesting against The Sharifs in London?

The question for this thread is not about why they aren't in Pakistan - please don't derail.

 

[Champ_Pal]

UK and West should stay out of Pakistani politics. Its none of their business. I support Sunak.

 

[KingKhanWC]

Why will he involve UK into a quagmire? Its a political fight in Pakistan, no nation will try to get involved and burn their hands.

And i am surprised, but do pakistanis really want foreigners to poke their noses into Pakistan?

Sunak is a puppet on string, he was never voted in by the public and only got the gig after Liz Truss made a fool of herself, she wasnt elected either.

Sunak has no chance of winning the next election. He is hated by most Asians inc many Indians but more importantly he is hated by many in the Torty party. Sunak can be a good uncle Tom but he cant change the colour of his skin or his background.

Its more to do with the policy of the UK, which Sunak has no say in.

The UK want Pakistan to stay in the Western camp , the same as the Yanks which is why the dumb woman the press secretary had no clue of the situation. West doesnt mind Pak or India for that matter to be ruined, kept down as this gives them leverage to force either side to do their biddings in the region.

 

[RexRex]

So, he had a chance to condemn the loss of life and the way political rivals are being arbitrarily arrested in Pakistan but all he could say was this.

Question is, will UK based PTI supporters forgive him come next time he asks the Pakistani-origin voters to vote conservative?

But this is essentially asking for a bit of foreign 'intervention' on a domestic matter. Last year Imran Khan complained about exactly this. Shouldn't Pakistani citizens be fixing this on their own ?

 

[KingKhanWC]

But this is essentially asking for a bit of foreign 'intervention' on a domestic matter. Last year Imran Khan complained about exactly this. Shouldn't Pakistani citizens be fixing this on their own ?

Nobody wants intervention.

This thread is asking Brits what they think of his statement.

Britain is the first to stand up and cry over human rights, democracy etc. But only when its in their interest and only when they want to install a government which will do their bidding.

The western leaders and governments are seen as fraud, liars and puppets of the elites. They have no credibility in the west , let alone from Pakistani public.

 

[RexRex]

Nobody wants intervention.

This thread is asking Brits what they think of his statement.

Britain is the first to stand up and cry over human rights, democracy etc. But only when its in their interest and only when they want to install a government which will do their bidding.

The western leaders and governments are seen as fraud, liars and puppets of the elites. They have no credibility in the west , let alone from Pakistani public.

What british bidding will an Imran Khan government refuse to do that a PDM government is willing to do ? Making generic statements like this is very typical of you.

 

[KingKhanWC]

What british bidding will an Imran Khan government refuse to do that a PDM government is willing to do ? Making generic statements like this is very typical of you.

Most who have followed his politics would know but you're looking to me to be educated.

Imran has been against all western foreign policies in the region since 2001.

 

[MenInG]

Let's try a mental experiment. Let’s suppose that the charismatic and massively popular leader of Iran’s main opposition party had been arrested as part of a paramilitary assault that looks to many like a kidnapping.

Let’s suppose his lawyer had been brutally assaulted at the same time and that many senior members of the opposition had been detained alongside the leader amid a massive media clampdown.

Let's also imagine that several protesters had been killed in state-sponsored repression as the military took control of the country and that all this took place just six months before a general election the opposition was on course to win.

It needs no great effort of the imagination to envisage the scale of official condemnation, or the barrage of commentary denouncing Iran.

But the British government has not uttered one word of criticism of the Pakistan government's decision to detain Imran Khan, the country’s former prime minister who was released on Thursday, along with senior members of the party leadership.

Nor of the brutal methods used to attack Pakistani citizens who took to the streets in protest.

In the British parliament on Wednesday, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told MPs that Khan's arrest was "an internal matter for Pakistan".

This remark makes zero sense. Britain is habitually free with commentary on the affairs of other countries where democratic freedoms have come under assault. To give one current example, this week British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly denounced the decision to readmit Syria to the Arab League.

By contrast, Cleverly has not even taken the routine step of summoning Pakistan’s ambassador to the Foreign Office for a dressing down.

The situation is made all the more extraordinary by the fact that the arrest of Khan took place when Shehbaz Sharif, Pakistan’s new prime minister, was in London.

Sharif came to London for last Saturday’s coronation and, according to Dawn Newspaper, stayed on in the capital till Wednesday for talks involving Nawaz Sharif, Shehbaz’s brother who was himself for many years Pakistan prime minister.

The Pakistan government says that the decision to arrest Khan was made according to due process by the National Accountability Bureau in the country’s capital Islamabad. Be that as it may, a decision of such immense consequence could not have been made without the full knowledge and approval of Shehbaz Sharif, who appears to have been in London when it was made.

And the fact the decision was made in London raises the question of how much Britain knew of Sharif’s plan to arrest his main political opponent. Was the British government consulted? Did Britain even give tacit consent?

Events in Pakistan are of grave importance to Britain, for two reasons. First, this nation of more than 200 million people has vast strategic significance as Britain and its allies struggle to come to terms with the aftermath of the Afghanistan debacle and the rise of China.

Second, more than two million British citizens boast Pakistani heritage. Many of them travel regularly to Pakistan to see friends and family. The consequences for Britain if Pakistan collapses into chaos are vast.

Humanitarian disaster
There were no more than an estimated 4,000 British citizens and dual nationals in Sudan when the country subsided into civil war last month, yet Britain struggled to get her people to safety. Now Pakistan is hovering on the verge of something similar.

If, God forbid, this was to happen, the humanitarian disaster would be countless times worse.

Cleverly was asleep at the wheel when Sudan fell into civil war. Warning signs were ignored till much too late, meaning that Britain was obliged to rely on other nations to rescue trapped nationals.

In an ominous repetition of events in Sudan, there is no sign that Cleverly has woken up this time either. Is there any evidence that Britain has made plans to evacuate its citizens if chaos turns into mass disorder? Has the high commission in Islamabad assembled a list of British nationals?

Insha’Allah all this may never happen - and the sensible intervention of Pakistan's Supreme Court that ordered Khan's release seems to have calmed the situation. But Britain failed to prepare for the worst in Sudan, and we should do so now in Pakistan.

But most troubling of all is Britain’s inert posture over the mass round-up of the leadership of Pakistan’s most popular political party. Cleverly loves to claim that Britain stands four square in defence of human rights, freedom and democracy. Britain’s refusal to demand the release of Khan and other political prisoners from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) opposition party proves that claim is hollow.

Worse than that, Britain’s refusal to condemn the actions of the Sharif government is beginning to look awfully like complicity.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/pakistan-uk-failure-condemn-imran-khan-arrest-complicity

 

[MenInG]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Let’s translate that for UK PM, British Foreign Office, US State Dept: Punjab Police barged into the home of Usman Dar, a PTI politician and threatened his sister that unless Usman Dar surrenders to Police, they will rape his old mother; after issuing this threat; they took the… <a href="https://t.co/gQIKFagiVL">https://t.co/gQIKFagiVL</a></p>— Moeed Pirzada (@MoeedNj) <a href="https://twitter.com/MoeedNj/status/1657434997811208197?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 13, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[MenInG]

Good to see Rishi hearing some noise

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">PTI London demonstration outside 10 Downing Street: <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/%D8%A2%D8%A6%DB%8C%D9%86_%D8%A8%DA%86%D8%A7%D8%A4_%D9%BE%D8%A7%DA%A9%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%A8%DA%86%D8%A7%D8%A4?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#آئین_بچاؤ_پاکستان_بچاؤ</a> <a href="https://t.co/0rwMxWK9EM">pic.twitter.com/0rwMxWK9EM</a></p>— PTI (@PTIofficial) <a href="https://twitter.com/PTIofficial/status/1657794525673189384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 14, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[MenInG]

Let's try a mental experiment. Let’s suppose that the charismatic and massively popular leader of Iran’s main opposition party had been arrested as part of a paramilitary assault that looks to many like a kidnapping.

Let’s suppose his lawyer had been brutally assaulted at the same time and that many senior members of the opposition had been detained alongside the leader amid a massive media clampdown.

Let's also imagine that several protesters had been killed in state-sponsored repression as the military took control of the country and that all this took place just six months before a general election the opposition was on course to win.

It needs no great effort of the imagination to envisage the scale of official condemnation, or the barrage of commentary denouncing Iran.

But the British government has not uttered one word of criticism of the Pakistan government's decision to detain Imran Khan, the country’s former prime minister who was released on Thursday, along with senior members of the party leadership.

Nor of the brutal methods used to attack Pakistani citizens who took to the streets in protest.

In the British parliament on Wednesday, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told MPs that Khan's arrest was "an internal matter for Pakistan".

This remark makes zero sense. Britain is habitually free with commentary on the affairs of other countries where democratic freedoms have come under assault. To give one current example, this week British Foreign Secretary James Cleverly denounced the decision to readmit Syria to the Arab League.

By contrast, Cleverly has not even taken the routine step of summoning Pakistan’s ambassador to the Foreign Office for a dressing down.

The situation is made all the more extraordinary by the fact that the arrest of Khan took place when Shehbaz Sharif, Pakistan’s new prime minister, was in London.

Sharif came to London for last Saturday’s coronation and, according to Dawn Newspaper, stayed on in the capital till Wednesday for talks involving Nawaz Sharif, Shehbaz’s brother who was himself for many years Pakistan prime minister.

The Pakistan government says that the decision to arrest Khan was made according to due process by the National Accountability Bureau in the country’s capital Islamabad. Be that as it may, a decision of such immense consequence could not have been made without the full knowledge and approval of Shehbaz Sharif, who appears to have been in London when it was made.

And the fact the decision was made in London raises the question of how much Britain knew of Sharif’s plan to arrest his main political opponent. Was the British government consulted? Did Britain even give tacit consent?

Events in Pakistan are of grave importance to Britain, for two reasons. First, this nation of more than 200 million people has vast strategic significance as Britain and its allies struggle to come to terms with the aftermath of the Afghanistan debacle and the rise of China.

Second, more than two million British citizens boast Pakistani heritage. Many of them travel regularly to Pakistan to see friends and family. The consequences for Britain if Pakistan collapses into chaos are vast.

Humanitarian disaster
There were no more than an estimated 4,000 British citizens and dual nationals in Sudan when the country subsided into civil war last month, yet Britain struggled to get her people to safety. Now Pakistan is hovering on the verge of something similar.

If, God forbid, this was to happen, the humanitarian disaster would be countless times worse.

Cleverly was asleep at the wheel when Sudan fell into civil war. Warning signs were ignored till much too late, meaning that Britain was obliged to rely on other nations to rescue trapped nationals.

In an ominous repetition of events in Sudan, there is no sign that Cleverly has woken up this time either. Is there any evidence that Britain has made plans to evacuate its citizens if chaos turns into mass disorder? Has the high commission in Islamabad assembled a list of British nationals?

Insha’Allah all this may never happen - and the sensible intervention of Pakistan's Supreme Court that ordered Khan's release seems to have calmed the situation. But Britain failed to prepare for the worst in Sudan, and we should do so now in Pakistan.

But most troubling of all is Britain’s inert posture over the mass round-up of the leadership of Pakistan’s most popular political party. Cleverly loves to claim that Britain stands four square in defence of human rights, freedom and democracy. Britain’s refusal to demand the release of Khan and other political prisoners from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) opposition party proves that claim is hollow.

Worse than that, Britain’s refusal to condemn the actions of the Sharif government is beginning to look awfully like complicity.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/pakistan-uk-failure-condemn-imran-khan-arrest-complicity

Some brilliant points.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

It's Rishi's inner hindutva talking. Interesting, I'd heard he had connections with the BJP via his wife, but wasn't sure if his British upbringing might have over-ridden it, but the mask is slipping. Rishi needs to distance himself from BJP leanings, he needs to represent Brits not Modi.

 

[gani999]

It's Rishi's inner hindutva talking. Interesting, I'd heard he had connections with the BJP via his wife, but wasn't sure if his British upbringing might have over-ridden it, but the mask is slipping. Rishi needs to distance himself from BJP leanings, he needs to represent Brits not Modi.

Rishi Sunak's in-laws in India are known leftists and Congress supporters, BJP haters in other words.

You need to stop 'hearing' things from your latrine, captain. )

 

[cricketjoshila]

It's Rishi's inner hindutva talking. Interesting, I'd heard he had connections with the BJP via his wife, but wasn't sure if his British upbringing might have over-ridden it, but the mask is slipping. Rishi needs to distance himself from BJP leanings, he needs to represent Brits not Modi.

Yes, Rishi Sunak needs to represent Brits and not Pakistanis or PTI supporters.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Rishi Sunak's in-laws in India are known leftists and Congress supporters, BJP haters in other words.

You need to stop 'hearing' things from your latrine, captain. )

I think context is important here. What you call a leftist is probably a lot different to what the rest of the world considers as such. Rishi is a Conservative PM, not Labour for a reason. He's right wing, same as Modi, and he's actually gone out of his way to deflect criticism of the BJP leader. Maybe once you have latrines over there, you may hear some voices of reason to balance the RSS mantras.

 

[Technics 1210]

Rishi Sunak's in-laws in India are known leftists and Congress supporters, BJP haters in other words.

You need to stop 'hearing' things from your latrine, captain. )

BJP or Congress, the core identity and unification is based on Hinduism.

Get with the program.

 

[MenInG]

Pakistan-origin Brits should take heed of how the US based Paks are going about the situation

US lawmakers urge Blinken to ‘pressure’ Pakistan on democracy, human rights

More than 60 US lawmakers have signed a bipartisan letter sent to State Secretary Antony Blinken, urging him to “prioritise the promotion and protection of democracy and human rights in Pakistan”.

The letter, shared on Twitter by the Pakistani American Political Action Committee, urges Blinken to “use all diplomatic tools — including calls, visits and public statements — to demonstrate US interest and prevent the erosion of democratic institutions in Pakistan”.

It says Congress members are concerned by the “blanket bans on demonstrations and deaths of several prominent critics of the government”.

 

[MenInG]

The parliament’s accountability body has expressed its displeasure over interference in the internal affairs of Pakistan by foreign countries while seeking details of the response by various Pakistani missions and embassies to this unwarranted criticism.

“Propaganda is being spread against Pakistan and US congressmen are also involved in it,” Public Accounts Committee (PAC) Chairman Noor Alam Khan said on Thursday while chairing its meeting.

The PAC chief was referring to the concern raised by various politicians of western countries, including the US, about the ongoing crackdown against the PTI party.

Sixty-five members of the US Congress have written to US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, asking him to exert pressure on the Pakistan government in order to address the “continually worsening human rights violations in the country”.

The letter, co-authored by Congresswoman Elissa Slotkin and Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick, expressed the US lawmakers’ concerns over “the democratic backsliding and human rights abuses in Pakistan”.

“As proponents of a strong US-Pakistan relationship, we write to express our concerns about the current situation in Pakistan and urge you to use all diplomatic tools at your disposal to pressure the Government of Pakistan towards a greater commitment to democracy, human rights, and the rule of law,” the letter to Secretary Blinken said.

Taking exception to this criticism, Noor Alam Khan said he as a lawmaker does not interfere in the internal affairs of the US or the Great Britain.

“So why do they interfere in the internal affairs of Pakistan or the government of Pakistan? Who gave you the right to try to interfere in the internal affairs of my country?” he asked.

 

[MenInG]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">For popping by and listening in relation to my concerns for the people of Pakistan; I cannot thank enough my local MP <a href="https://twitter.com/AJRichardsonMP?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@AJRichardsonMP</a> . Your support <a href="https://twitter.com/BHAkhtar1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BHAkhtar1</a> has been super-thanks to your good self also. <br>Angela listened attentively with kindness and empathised as I reeled off… <a href="https://t.co/ZJ3kSpi81s">pic.twitter.com/ZJ3kSpi81s</a></p>— Saffina Ellahi PTI SMT (@SaffinaEllahi1) <a href="https://twitter.com/SaffinaEllahi1/status/1659898284930940928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 20, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[NishanKonar]

It's Rishi's inner hindutva talking. Interesting, I'd heard he had connections with the BJP via his wife, but wasn't sure if his British upbringing might have over-ridden it, but the mask is slipping. Rishi needs to distance himself from BJP leanings, he needs to represent Brits not Modi.

Rishi Sunak has better things to do in life than worry over a bunch of clowns screaming and abusing and making a fool of themselves outside Avenfield !

Nobody in the West really cares much about Imran Khan or Pakistan. Imran Khan whined about not even getting a phone call with Joe Biden or Blinken when he was PM. You think Biden or Sunak will care now when he is not even PM ?

Many reasons why nobody cares. Imran Khan often accused US for ousting him from power. Openly gloated about Taliban takeover and hailed Osama as martyr. On top Pakistan's economy is in deep trouble - so no real benefits in getting involved. Foreign policy is mostly about mutual benefits

 

[cricketjoshila]

Rishi Sunak has better things to do in life than worry over a bunch of clowns screaming and abusing and making a fool of themselves outside Avenfield !

Nobody in the West really cares much about Imran Khan or Pakistan. Imran Khan whined about not even getting a phone call with Joe Biden or Blinken when he was PM. You think Biden or Sunak will care now when he is not even PM ?

Many reasons why nobody cares. Imran Khan often accused US for ousting him from power. Openly gloated about Taliban takeover and hailed Osama as martyr. On top Pakistan's economy is in deep trouble - so no real benefits in getting involved. Foreign policy is mostly about mutual benefits

Why will anyone want to take sides in a Pakistani political problem? Whoever is in power, they will deal with that person. Army Imran Nawaz Bilawal they don't mind.

It will be surprising if any head of state makes any official comment supporting any side. It will simply not happen.

 

[Technics 1210]

No one cares about the unelected Sunak, he is a lame duck PM, parading his wife on G7 handouts, and will be indicted for fraud given his shenanigans as CE.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Rishi Sunak has better things to do in life than worry over a bunch of clowns screaming and abusing and making a fool of themselves outside Avenfield !

Nobody in the West really cares much about Imran Khan or Pakistan. Imran Khan whined about not even getting a phone call with Joe Biden or Blinken when he was PM. You think Biden or Sunak will care now when he is not even PM ?

Many reasons why nobody cares. Imran Khan often accused US for ousting him from power. Openly gloated about Taliban takeover and hailed Osama as martyr. On top Pakistan's economy is in deep trouble - so no real benefits in getting involved. Foreign policy is mostly about mutual benefits

That's quite a rant for someone who doesn't "care". I didn't mention Imran Khan, Taliban or Pakistan by the way, so quite a feat to get all of them into your reply to my post.

I said he needs to represent Brits not Modi.

 

[MenInG]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Pakistani-Americans are gathered in front of the White House in Washington DC to protest against human rights violations and the danger to democracy in Pakistan. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/PTIUSAProtest?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#PTIUSAProtest</a> <a href="https://t.co/zy9DS0Ss1S">pic.twitter.com/zy9DS0Ss1S</a></p>— PTI (@PTIofficial) <a href="https://twitter.com/PTIofficial/status/1660380045385388035?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 21, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[MenInG]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">&#55358;&#56821;Today <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ImranKhanPTI</a> was set to join a call with senior Conservative Party colleagues when, without warning, Pakistan's telecoms authorities cut off internet connections to his compound. I’m grateful to <a href="https://twitter.com/sayedzbukhari?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@sayedzbukhari</a> for speaking to us. 1/2 <a href="https://t.co/85oDhKwNBO">pic.twitter.com/85oDhKwNBO</a></p>— Sara Britcliffe MP (@SarBritcliffeMP) <a href="https://twitter.com/SarBritcliffeMP/status/1661437553831018503?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

[MenInG]

In the meantime, Australians showing more backbone

 

[emranabbas]

Why will he involve UK into a quagmire? Its a political fight in Pakistan, no nation will try to get involved and burn their hands.

And i am surprised, but do pakistanis really want foreigners to poke their noses into Pakistan?

Not long ago these same pti people were saying imran khan is very brave and bold for showing middle finger to the west

Absolutely not was pakistans slogan

Now they are begging for western involvement

Just don't make sense

I'm surprised turkey and Russia are quiet in this matter

 

[MenInG]

In the meantime, Australians showing more backbone

Australians are getting involved now. This is interesting. Not long before US makes a statement also

 

[MenInG]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">British Pakistanis have launched an awareness digital campaign to highlight the lack of democracy, violation of human rights, and illegal abductions happening in Pakistan. <br><br>The digital van will be moving in front of the House of Parliament, the British Prime Minister's… <a href="https://t.co/djmGfsglRe">pic.twitter.com/djmGfsglRe</a></p>— PTI UK (@UKPTIOfficial) <a href="https://twitter.com/UKPTIOfficial/status/1667210150900318220?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 9, 2023</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>