What's new

2020 Democratic Party presidential candidates [Bernie Sanders drops out Update#741]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Welp. Lol. <a href="https://t.co/CCEVUbwFag">pic.twitter.com/CCEVUbwFag</a></p>— Tuxedo Mask (@TheLoveBel0w) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheLoveBel0w/status/1224490313529675777?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 4, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Welp. Lol. <a href="https://t.co/CCEVUbwFag">pic.twitter.com/CCEVUbwFag</a></p>— Tuxedo Mask (@TheLoveBel0w) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheLoveBel0w/status/1224490313529675777?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 4, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

If the two progressives really do take the top two slots, it would be a real blow to the party establishment. We will know in a couple of hours.
 
If the two progressives really do take the top two slots, it would be a real blow to the party establishment. We will know in a couple of hours.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Listening to this clip over and over bc it’s the dopest song I’ve ever heard �� �� �� <a href="https://t.co/HG2Bs536BH">pic.twitter.com/HG2Bs536BH</a></p>— Secular Talk (@KyleKulinski) <a href="https://twitter.com/KyleKulinski/status/1224481224997117963?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 3, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Muslims are coming out in numbers for <a href="https://twitter.com/BernieSanders?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BernieSanders</a>! <a href="https://t.co/MaAjv1afyY">pic.twitter.com/MaAjv1afyY</a></p>— Abshir Omar (@AbshirDSM) <a href="https://twitter.com/AbshirDSM/status/1224511086868692992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 4, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Results delayed, ostensibly for “quality control checks.”

I smell a rat. The establishment is indulging in dhaandli.
 
All the candidates are giving victory speeches. They're technically right too: each one is tied for first place with the ten other candidates at 0% of the vote.
 
The establishment trying to steal the election from Bernie. Biden was disappointing, he's a failure lol.
 
Results from Iowa's caucuses, the first vote in the race to pick a Democratic White House candidate, have been plunged into chaos by apparent technology issues.

The state's Democratic party said it had found "inconsistencies".

But they stressed the unprecedented holdup was a "reporting issue" and not because of a "hack or an intrusion".

Voters flocked to over 1,600 schools, libraries and churches across 99 counties on Monday to pick candidates.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51367291
 
Bernie's campaign had staff do their own counts at caucuses, and they have released 40% of their results, showing Bernie victorious on 29%, followed by Pete Buttigeg on 26%, Warren on 21%, and Biden on 13%.

On first count, Bernie won by an even larger margin (+8).
 
Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders are leading in Iowa's caucuses, according to partial results from the chaotic first vote in the race to pick a Democratic White House candidate.

Iowa's Democratic Party said data from 71% of precincts showed Mr Buttigieg on 26.8% with Mr Sanders on 25.2%.

Elizabeth Warren was third on 18.4% and Joe Biden fourth on 15.4%.

The eventual nominee will challenge President Donald Trump, a Republican, in November's White House election.

Amy Klobuchar was on 12.6%, and Andrew Yang on 1%, according to the other preliminary results released on Tuesday evening from all of Iowa's 99 counties. Tom Steyer and Tulsi Gabbard were on less than 1%.

But the state party has still not declared a winner from Monday's vote, which was derailed by technical malfunctions.

The results represent the share of delegates needed to clinch the party nomination under America's quirky political system. Iowa awards only 41 of the 1,991 delegates required to become the Democratic White House nominee.

But in the popular vote count, partial results showed Mr Sanders leading with 32,673 ballots, while Mr Buttigieg was second at 31,353.

Ms Warren was third with 25,692, followed by Mr Biden at 16,447 and Ms Klobuchar at 15,470.

Iowa was the first contest in a string of nationwide state-by-state votes, known as primaries and caucuses, that will culminate in the crowning of a Democratic White House candidate at the party convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in July.

Eleven candidates remain in a Democratic field that has already been whittled down from more than two dozen.

Where did it all go wrong?
Iowa Democratic party chairman Troy Price told a news conference on Tuesday evening the fiasco had been "simply unacceptable".

"I apologise deeply for this," he added of the turmoil, which has provoked calls for Iowa to lose its coveted spot atop the presidential voting calendar.

"This was a coding error," he said, while insisting the data was secure and promising a thorough review.

State party officials earlier said the problem was not the result of "a hack or an intrusion".

Officials were being dispatched across the Hawkeye state to retrieve hard-copy results.

They were matching those numbers against results reported via a mobile app that many precinct captains said had crashed.

Trump declares 'win' amid Democratic caucus chaos
Voters flocked on Monday to more than 1,600 caucus sites, including libraries, high schools and community centres.

President Trump said earlier that the Iowa Democratic caucuses had been an "unmitigated disaster".

Who is Pete Buttigieg?
If elected, 38-year-old Mr Buttigieg would be the first openly gay US president.

He is the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, a city of just over 100,000 people.

He is a former Harvard and Oxford University Rhodes scholar, who served as a military intelligence officer in Afghanistan and used to work for global management consultancy McKinsey.

Rivals say Mr Buttigieg, who is younger than Macaulay Culkin and Britney Spears, is too inexperienced to be US president.

But he says he is transformative outsider who can break the gridlock in Washington and defeat President Trump.

Campaigning in Laconia, New Hampshire, on Tuesday evening, Mr Buttigieg welcomed the preliminary results.

"A campaign that started a year ago with four staff members, no name recognition, no money, just a big idea, a campaign that some said should have no business even making this attempt, has taken its place at the front of this race to replace the current president with a better vision for the future," he said.

Flames lick at Biden's heels
We finally have some 2020 Iowa caucuses results to talk about. And they're going to generate a lot of talk - and hand-wringing.

There are clear winners, as Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg can both claim some kind of victory, depending on how the final tabulations come in.

There's also a clear loser - Joe Biden. He entered Monday leading in some polls and hoping for a strong showing that would put to bed concerns that he is a flawed front-runner.

Instead those concerns are wide awake and pacing the room.

Unlike candidates like Mr Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Mr Buttigieg, the Biden campaign coffers are thin - and this Iowa performance isn't opening any cash spigots.

It could have been worse for the former vice-president - he could have had to give a fourth-place concession speech on Monday night - but the end result is the same.

He was unable to land a knock-out blow on fellow moderate Amy Klobuchar, while Mr Buttigieg and Mr Sanders both exit Iowa strengthened, suggesting Mr Biden could be staring at a third-place finish - or worse - in New Hampshire.

Until proven otherwise, Biden still has his southern-state firewall, based on support from elderly and black voters. But the flames are licking at his heels.

How have the other campaigns responded?
After pumping nearly $800m (£610m) into campaigning in Iowa, the rival campaigns expressed dismay at the debacle.

Mr Sanders, a Vermont senator, told reporters he was "obviously disappointed" at the hold-up, which he said was "not a good night for democracy".

He said there was no reason to cast "aspersions" on the results, but criticised Mr Buttigieg's decision to declare victory on Monday night, despite the lack of any official results.

"I don't know how anybody declares victory before you have an official statement from the election results, we're not even declaring victory," Mr Sanders said.

Ms Warren, a Massachusetts senator, and former US Vice-President Biden earlier on Tuesday questioned the state party's decision to release partial results.

Biden campaign senior adviser Symone Sanders told reporters: "What we're saying is there are some inconsistencies, that the process, the integrity, is at stake."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51380686
 
Last edited:
Biden vows to press on despite Iowa 'gut punch'

White House hopeful Joe Biden has called his poor performance in the Democrats' first 2020 leadership vote, in Iowa's caucuses, a "gut punch".

Mr Biden has come fourth, according to incomplete results from the election to pick a Democratic presidential nominee.

"I'm not going to sugarcoat it," Mr Biden said. "This isn't the first time in my life I've been knocked down."

With most results declared in Monday's glitch-plagued caucuses, Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders are neck and neck.

But Mr Biden told an audience in New Hampshire: "I'm not going anywhere."

According to partial results from Iowa, the former US vice-president under Barack Obama has failed to pick up a single one of the delegates needed to clinch the Democratic White House nomination under America's quirky political system.

A simple guide to US primaries and caucuses
Each candidate's secret weapon against Trump
Who will take on Trump?

New Hampshire will be the next state to vote on 11 February in a string of nationwide votes culminating with the crowning of the party's presidential candidate in July.

Eleven contenders remain in the race to challenge President Donald Trump, a Republican, in November's election.

With 86% of precincts reporting, Mayor Pete Buttigieg is in first place with 26.7% of the vote
Iowa, which has long defended its position as the first race of the election year, was beset by problems when its app for reporting results crashed on Monday, spawning lengthy delays in results.
The Iowa caucuses present candidates with a golden opportunity to generate campaign momentum.

By Wednesday, 95% of precincts had reported:
Mr Buttigieg, the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, has 26.4% of the vote, awarding him 11 delegates

Mr Sanders, a Vermont senator, has 25.7%, also with 11 delegates
Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren has 18.3% and five delegates
Mr Biden has 15.8%, which leaves him with zero delegates
Those delegates will eventually represent these candidates when the Democratic nominee is chosen later this year.

Other candidates who failed to secure a single delegate include Amy Klobuchar (12.2%) and Andrew Yang (1%).

Iowa Democratic officials have said a "coding error" in the system caused the results delay, firmly rejecting suggestions that something more sinister, such as a hack or fix, might have swayed the outcome.

What else did Biden say?
On Wednesday, Mr Biden sharpened his attacks, targeting the two Democratic front-runners by name.
"We need a nominee who can help Democrats up and down the ticket," Mr Biden said.
He suggested that self-described democratic socialist Mr Sanders would be unelectable in a general election.

Mr Biden also said it would be a "risk" to nominate 38-year-old Mr Buttigieg, "someone who's never held an office higher than mayor of a town of 100,000 people".

Mr Buttigieg responded by saying "the bulk of the credit for the achievements of the Obama administration belong with President Obama".
Why did Biden come up short in Iowa?
By all accounts, Mr Biden failed to energise crowds to the extent that some of his rivals did in largely white, rural Iowa.

He has faced scrutiny for his verbal gaffes and his long and sometimes controversial political career, including his vote in favour of the Iraq war.
And Republicans have been hammering away at him for his son's lucrative board position with a Ukrainian natural gas firm at the time his father was US vice-president and in charge of American-Ukrainian relations, which came up in the Trump impeachment case.

Mr Biden, who remains the front-runner nationally, is hoping to shine in later primary contests with more diverse electorates, such as Nevada or South Carolina.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51394918
 
With 97% of precincts reporting, Bernie is almost level with Buttigieg in terms of delegates. On first voter preference, he’s far ahead, and ahead even after realignment. It would be great if he ends up ahead on the delegate count also, so he doesn’t have to share the plaudits with Mayor Pete.

On to New Hampshire. I first thought it would be a stroll for Bernie given how he’s from neighboring Vermont, but then I realized Warren is from neighboring Massachusetts.
 
The democrats once again showing their incompetence by trusting an app :))). No wonder that a clown like Trump was able to win the elections.
 
With 97% of precincts reporting, Bernie is almost level with Buttigieg in terms of delegates. On first voter preference, he’s far ahead, and ahead even after realignment. It would be great if he ends up ahead on the delegate count also, so he doesn’t have to share the plaudits with Mayor Pete.

On to New Hampshire. I first thought it would be a stroll for Bernie given how he’s from neighboring Vermont, but then I realized Warren is from neighboring Massachusetts.

Polling shows it's a battle between Bernie and Buttigeg. Unfortunately, Buttigeg got all the attention after Iowa.
 
Polling shows it's a battle between Bernie and Buttigeg. Unfortunately, Buttigeg got all the attention after Iowa.

They can both claim victory: Bernie for getting the most votes (even after second preferences were taken into account), and Buttigieg for the most delegates. But you're right that Buttigieg garnered the attention. That will change in NH.

I think SC will be the real test. If Biden can't win that one, he's done for, especially if its coupled with a strong Bernie showing.
 
Buttigeg is gay, bernie is too old, mike is too short (and old). Meh. Democrats why you didn't bring better candidates :sanga, what happened to Beto Orourke. Looking at these candidates they are brunch for trump. Bernie has great socialist ideas but America will never go full socialist, that's like going against bible. In which case Buttigeg is also out.
 
They can both claim victory: Bernie for getting the most votes (even after second preferences were taken into account), and Buttigieg for the most delegates. But you're right that Buttigieg garnered the attention. That will change in NH.

I think SC will be the real test. If Biden can't win that one, he's done for, especially if its coupled with a strong Bernie showing.

I don't think Biden can wait till SC, he must win Nevada otherwise it's over for him. He is already running short on funds, if he has 0 wins out of the first 3 states, then his billionaire friends will jump on Wall Street Pete bandwagon.
 
I don't think Biden can wait till SC, he must win Nevada otherwise it's over for him. He is already running short on funds, if he has 0 wins out of the first 3 states, then his billionaire friends will jump on Wall Street Pete bandwagon.

Or the Bloomberg bandwagon.
 
Buttigeg is gay, bernie is too old, mike is too short (and old). Meh. Democrats why you didn't bring better candidates :sanga, what happened to Beto Orourke. Looking at these candidates they are brunch for trump. Bernie has great socialist ideas but America will never go full socialist, that's like going against bible. In which case Buttigeg is also out.

Beto who? Looks like you don't follow American politics. He dropped out of the race in November 2019, his campaign didn't get same enthusiasm as he got in the 2018 senate race. His best bet was to run for the Senate seat of John Cornyn.

Bernie is not endorsing full-on socialism, he is campaigning for social democratic policies similar to Scandinavian countries.
 
Beto dropped out..

My personal view is that only Biden will have a realistic shot.. this country will ever go for radically socialist views of warren or sanders, the DEm establishment knows that’s which is why sanders was cheated out in favor of Clinton in 2016. They still don’t want him. They will heavily favor Biden.

And Clinton is right about tulsi. She is a Russian agent, funded by them to break democratic votes for trump.

Buttigieg is gay, warren and sanders are socialists. Go figure!
 
Beto who? Looks like you don't follow American politics. He dropped out of the race in November 2019, his campaign didn't get same enthusiasm as he got in the 2018 senate race. His best bet was to run for the Senate seat of John Cornyn.

Bernie is not endorsing full-on socialism, he is campaigning for social democratic policies similar to Scandinavian countries.

Yeah and that is unfortunate. He was the ideal candidate, coming from a big red state. Its too bad democrats are idiots and didn't see this as an opportunity to turn Texas blue.

I agree with somethings bernie says like about healthcare but honestly he has that socialism tag and thats a hard sell. Democrats are shooting themselves in the foot by not going with a fresh face who would be an electable.
 
Trying to win California by 90% rather than 70% won't help in swing states. To counter Trump, simply a sane individual in center was needed, but candidates are going too extreme.
 
Yeah and that is unfortunate. He was the ideal candidate, coming from a big red state. Its too bad democrats are idiots and didn't see this as an opportunity to turn Texas blue.

I agree with somethings bernie says like about healthcare but honestly he has that socialism tag and thats a hard sell. Democrats are shooting themselves in the foot by not going with a fresh face who would be an electable.

Beto was not a good candidate for White House, at least not in 2020. He couldn't turn Texas blue against Cruz, no way he would have turned Texas blue against Trump. Democratic leadership is stupid, they think people who got us Trump will beat Trump.
 
Beto was not a good candidate for White House, at least not in 2020. He couldn't turn Texas blue against Cruz, no way he would have turned Texas blue against Trump. Democratic leadership is stupid, they think people who got us Trump will beat Trump.

I don’t think it’s the people.. I think it’s the message.. the Dems have been lately found wanting on what sort of counter offer they can make to the American people that will be more appealing than trump. Simply bashing trump and whining about it won’t do. You have to give the people, especially swing voters something attractive to mobilize them.
 
Beto dropped out..

My personal view is that only Biden will have a realistic shot.. this country will ever go for radically socialist views of warren or sanders, the DEm establishment knows that’s which is why sanders was cheated out in favor of Clinton in 2016. They still don’t want him. They will heavily favor Biden.

And Clinton is right about tulsi. She is a Russian agent, funded by them to break democratic votes for trump.

Buttigieg is gay, warren and sanders are socialists. Go figure!

Biden has no chance against Trump. He is Hilary 2.0. Democratic establishment rigged and ran an experiment in 2016, and it blew up in their face.

Hilary is still salty about her loss. She is just trying to stay in limelight by making stupid accusations against Tulsi and Sanders. She has blamed everyone but herself for the 2016 loss.


I don’t think it’s the people.. I think it’s the message.. the Dems have been lately found wanting on what sort of counter offer they can make to the American people that will be more appealing than trump. Simply bashing trump and whining about it won’t do. You have to give the people, especially swing voters something attractive to mobilize them.


I agree Democrats have to talk about policies that improve the lives of average American. There is a reason why Bernie won Michigan and Wisconson primaries in 2016, and still relevant at the age of 78 years. Even Trump ran on populist policies in 2016, that Bernie has been fighting for since 80s. Democratic establishment is rigging against Bernie because they don't want to upset their billionaire bosses.
 
Biden is a safe bet.. sanders is good for some states but in swing states he won’t cut it..

The reason I think Biden is favored is because one he is not too radical and two he can scrap.. in a one on one debate he is the only one who can get as dirty as trump can.. he can be nasty if he wants to.. I think trump realizes that which is why the whole Ukraine gate happened. Trump genuinely wanted Ukraine to openly announce investigation into Biden’s son’s affairs just so he has some dirt to throw on his father. I don’t think he will be too worried with sanders or warren, etc.. Biden is a former VP and has the backing of the dem establishment.. he just has to find something that appeals to the voters.. but the Iowa results are very discouraging for him to be honest..
 
Biden is a safe bet.. sanders is good for some states but in swing states he won’t cut it..

The reason I think Biden is favored is because one he is not too radical and two he can scrap.. in a one on one debate he is the only one who can get as dirty as trump can.. he can be nasty if he wants to.. I think trump realizes that which is why the whole Ukraine gate happened. Trump genuinely wanted Ukraine to openly announce investigation into Biden’s son’s affairs just so he has some dirt to throw on his father. I don’t think he will be too worried with sanders or warren, etc.. Biden is a former VP and has the backing of the dem establishment.. he just has to find something that appeals to the voters.. but the Iowa results are very discouraging for him to be honest..

Biden is radical just on the wrong side. Iraq war vote, attacks on Libya without congressional approvals, calls through his career to cut social security and medicare, his record on busing, campaign finances, etc. He crumbles under pressure, whenever he doesn't have an answer he tells you to vote for someone else.
 
The battle between US Democratic presidential hopefuls Pete Buttigieg and Joe Biden has heated up this weekend following the chaos of last week's Iowa caucus.

Appearing on ABC's This Week, the two candidates continued to attack each other's record.

Their interviews came after Mr Biden shared a video mocking Pete Buttigieg's record as mayor of South Bend, Indiana.

The first primary of the election begins in New Hampshire on Tuesday.

Initial results of the Iowa caucus on 3 February, which was beset by technical problems, showed Mr Buttigieg in a narrow lead ahead of Bernie Sanders, with both candidates receiving around a quarter of the votes.

Mr Biden, however, came in fourth.

Buttigieg chokes up as he takes early lead in Iowa result

Why now?
Mr Biden's new campaign video, which has been viewed four million times since it was posted on Twitter on Saturday, launched a scathing attack on Mr Buttigieg, comparing his own achievements as vice-president to his opponent's record as mayor of the city of South Bend.

The video claimed that Mr Buttigieg had fired a black police chief and forced out a black fire chief during his time as mayor.

"The vice president's decision to run this ad speaks more to where he currently stands in this race than it does about Pete's perspective as a mayor and veteran," Buttigieg's national press secretary responded.

Asked in an interview with ABC News on Sunday if he thought Mr Buttigieg had "a race problem", Mr Biden replied: "No, I'm saying he hasn't been able to unify the black community, that's what I'm saying."

"Let's get something straight here," Mr Biden said. "I didn't attack Pete. Pete's been attacking me. He's been saying the reason we're in the problem we're in now is because of the recent past. That's 8 years of Obama and me. I don't get that."

When told that former Vice-President Biden's position appeared to essentially be that Buttigieg "is no Barack Obama", the former mayor responded: "Well he's right, I'm not Barack Obama, and neither is he. Neither is anyone running for president right now. And this isn't 2008, it's 2020, and this election is about where our country is headed next."

He responded to Biden's argument about the importance of winning the support of black voters by saying: "I'm going to have to work to earn that vote, just as I did in South Bend."

"We need to have a systemic vision for dismantling systemic racism," he went on to say.

Biden, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar: Who has what it takes to beat Trump?

There are now fewer than a dozen candidates left in the race to become the Democratic nominee for the 3 November presidential election.

The party's official nominee is announced in July during the Democratic National Convention, although a clear frontrunner usually emerges before this.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51437540
 
Biden is a safe bet.. sanders is good for some states but in swing states he won’t cut it..

The reason I think Biden is favored is because one he is not too radical and two he can scrap.. in a one on one debate he is the only one who can get as dirty as trump can.. he can be nasty if he wants to.. I think trump realizes that which is why the whole Ukraine gate happened. Trump genuinely wanted Ukraine to openly announce investigation into Biden’s son’s affairs just so he has some dirt to throw on his father. I don’t think he will be too worried with sanders or warren, etc.. Biden is a former VP and has the backing of the dem establishment.. he just has to find something that appeals to the voters.. but the Iowa results are very discouraging for him to be honest..

Actually it's the exact opposite. Bernie isn't radical, his proposals are simple common sense ideas that have already been adopted in most of the western world. His appeal is strongest in Midwestern swing states, where the politically apathetic working class don't think very highly of political establishment figures like Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton.

You don't take on a self proclaimed anti-establishment populist with someone from the establishment. You take them on with a true populist like Bernie. The likes of Biden will get absolutely clobbered in the Midwest.
 
For those of you saying Biden is a safe bet, have you even been watching the debates? He's getting worse and worse with each debate, looks like an old man who's completely lost it.
 
Bernie campaign releases Urdu poster:

Bernie-Sanders-Urdu-campaign.jpg.webp


His campaign manager is a Pakistani-American by the way, Faiz Shakir, a former director at ACLU.
 
For those of you saying Biden is a safe bet, have you even been watching the debates? He's getting worse and worse with each debate, looks like an old man who's completely lost it.
You didn’t understand my point. He is a safe bet for the establishment in terms of principles. And you are completely wrong about bernie’s appeal in the Midwest. The Mid-West is where trump won the election. Why? Because they were mobilized by trump using race based politics.. they don’t want bernie’s radical ideas.. they just wanted Obama’s policies folded up and put away. They want less immigrants.. they want less social welfare handout because blacks and Latinos are the biggest beneficiaries (according to them). Bernie promises the exact opposite.

Biden doesnt. That’s why I said what I said. His performance in the debates is a different issue.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ll vote for Bernie myself. And you are right, you need a populist to fight a populist, but bernie’s populism is limited to already blue states.
 
Bernie Sanders has won the New Hampshire Democratic primary contest, on a terrible night for former vice-president Joe Biden.

The left-wing senator took a tight victory over centrist former mayor Pete Buttigieg, who offered a different Democratic vision in the race to take on President Trump in November.

Mr Sanders declared the night "the beginning of the end" of Mr Trump.

The race moves next to the Nevada caucuses on 22 February.

Finishing behind the Vermont senator were two moderates - Mr Buttigieg and Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar, who emerged as a surprise contender by taking third place.

Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren and Mr Biden - two erstwhile frontrunners - finished in fourth and fifth places.

Technology entrepreneur Andrew Yang and Colorado senator Michael Bennet both dropped out of the race.

What happened in New Hampshire?
Some 280,000 Democratic voters cast ballots in the Granite State on Tuesday night, delivering 26% to Mr Sanders.

With 95% of the vote counted, Mr Sanders, 78, led Mr Buttigieg, the 38-year-old the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, by only 1.6%, or about 4,300 votes.

Mr Sanders hailed a "great victory" as he thanked supporters from a rally in Manchester, New Hampshire.

"This victory here is the beginning of the end for Donald Trump," he said, and promised to build an "unprecedented multi-generational, multi-racial political movement" to defeat the Republican.

The result will give Mr Sanders nine of the 24 delegates who will represent New Hampshire at the July Democratic national convention, where the party crowns a nominee based on the delegates won.

Although he had fewer votes, Mr Buttigieg will also get nine delegates. Thanking supporters, he warned against succumbing to "a polarised vision" of politics and pitched himself as the centrist to bring new voters into the party.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51470088
 
Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg's sexuality has become a campaign issue after a radio host questioned if voters would pick a man "kissing his husband on stage".

Firebrand conservative Rush Limbaugh said Democrats must realise America is still not ready to elect a gay man.

Mr Buttigieg's Democratic rivals leapt to his defence, and President Donald Trump said he would vote for a gay man.

Mr Limbaugh was last week awarded a top civilian honour by the president.

On his radio show which is nationally syndicated to millions of listeners, Mr Limbaugh on Wednesday imagined Demcorats' deliberations over who to vote for.

He said: "They're saying, 'OK, how's this going to look? Thirty-seven-year-old gay guy kissing his husband on stage, next to Mr Man, Donald Trump.'"

If elected, 38-year-old Mr Buttigieg would be the first openly gay US president. He is the former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, a city of just over 100,000 people.

Mr Buttigieg did not directly address the radio host's remarks during an event in Las Vegas, Nevada, on Thursday night, but said: "I'm proud of my marriage I'm proud of my husband."

His campaign declined to comment.

President Trump was asked in an interview with a Fox News journalist on Thursday if he would be open to voting for a gay candidate.

"I think so," the Republican president said. "I think there would be some that wouldn't, and I wouldn't be among that group, to be honest with you.

"I think that it doesn't seem to be hurting Pete Buttigieg."

According to Pew Research, the proportion of Americans in favour of same-sex marriage is at 61%, a number that has levelled out in the last few years after steadily rising for a decade.

Former Vice-President Joe Biden, who has been beaten by Mr Buttigieg in the first two votes of the presidential primary season, in Iowa and New Hampshire, lashed out at Mr Limbaugh.

He said on ABC's daytime chat show The View on Thursday: "It is part of the depravity of this administration… Pete and I are competitors, but this guy has honour, he has courage, he's smart as hell."

But conservative commentators defended Mr Limbaugh.

The Federalist magazine said the radio host's remarks were not homophobic.

"Operatives in Buttigieg's own campaign have asked these questions in deciding how he should approach being the first openly gay major presidential candidate," said its article.

Influential Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said: "I think the country is not going to disqualify somebody because of their sexual orientation."

But he rejected any suggestion that the Presidential Medal of Freedom, which First Lady Melania Trump last week bestowed on Mr Limbaugh, should be withdrawn.

"Well, my God. Free speech still exists," he said.

Ben Ferguson, a conservative radio host, said he has spoken to Democratic voters on his show who are unsure if Mr Buttigieg's sexual orientation could hamper him in defeating Mr Trump.

"There was a surprising number of Democratic voters who said it was an issue for them," he told CNN. "The reality is what Limbaugh was talking about."

In Iowa's caucuses last week one voter asked to rescind her ballot for Mr Buttigieg after learning he was gay.

"I don't want anybody like that in the White House," she said. "So, can I have my card back?"

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51506972
 
Bern-man bernie VS I-love-men Pete . So we are down to center left-ish and a socialist .Damn this race is gonna transform America , doesn't matter who wins.
 
You didn’t understand my point. He is a safe bet for the establishment in terms of principles. And you are completely wrong about bernie’s appeal in the Midwest. The Mid-West is where trump won the election. Why? Because they were mobilized by trump using race based politics.. they don’t want bernie’s radical ideas.. they just wanted Obama’s policies folded up and put away. They want less immigrants.. they want less social welfare handout because blacks and Latinos are the biggest beneficiaries (according to them). Bernie promises the exact opposite.

Biden doesnt. That’s why I said what I said. His performance in the debates is a different issue.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ll vote for Bernie myself. And you are right, you need a populist to fight a populist, but bernie’s populism is limited to already blue states.

Yup. Hilary didn't even go once to Wis. or Ohio thinking they were in the bag. Lost both states along with PA.
 
I honestly don’t see any outcome here without Bernie but the dem establishment will hate it and do their best to keep him out again like they did in 2016. Right now his campaign looks the most energized. Not looking good for Biden.
 
I honestly don’t see any outcome here without Bernie but the dem establishment will hate it and do their best to keep him out again like they did in 2016. Right now his campaign looks the most energized. Not looking good for Biden.

I'm afraid Biden will win South Carolina and then win on Super Tuesday, after that he'll finish off with the nomination by May.
 
I'm afraid Biden will win South Carolina and then win on Super Tuesday, after that he'll finish off with the nomination by May.

I don't think it's that straight forward for Biden. If Nevada results are anything like Iowa or New Hampshire then Biden is looking at serious trouble in South Carolina. Biden will most likely win South Carolina, but he was up by almost 25+ points in polls, now he might win that state by maybe 2-3 points. Bad results in Nevada will most likely mean that he won't have funds to aggressively campaign for the super Tuesday States. Even with the slow start, Biden's path to the nomination is still much better than #WallStreetPete and Amy Klobuchar.
 
I honestly don’t see any outcome here without Bernie but the dem establishment will hate it and do their best to keep him out again like they did in 2016. Right now his campaign looks the most energized. Not looking good for Biden.

Dems establishment is hoping for a brokered convention and then super delegates putting their weight behind Biden, if he is still in the race, or Bloomberg. If DNC tries to rig it again against Sanders, then it will be the end of the Democratic party.
 
Dems establishment is hoping for a brokered convention and then super delegates putting their weight behind Biden, if he is still in the race, or Bloomberg. If DNC tries to rig it again against Sanders, then it will be the end of the Democratic party.

Not gonna happen this time . I like bernie but he is too far left for my liking . I'd settle for a pete or even warren at this point. Biden doesn't really excite TBH. So far it seems like bernie is the man though ! The kind of excitement I see for bernie from both democrats and even working class republicans is unparalleled . He already got the black vote, it wont be so easy for the dem establishment and MSM to discredit bernie like 2016 .Back then the Clinton had a tight hold on the party,Now even grandma pelosi is scrambling to keep her chair and had to make concessions to the new progressive left of the party . Bernie has already transformed the Dem party even without being the president .
 
Not gonna happen this time . I like bernie but he is too far left for my liking . I'd settle for a pete or even warren at this point. Biden doesn't really excite TBH. So far it seems like bernie is the man though ! The kind of excitement I see for bernie from both democrats and even working class republicans is unparalleled . He already got the black vote, it wont be so easy for the dem establishment and MSM to discredit bernie like 2016 .Back then the Clinton had a tight hold on the party,Now even grandma pelosi is scrambling to keep her chair and had to make concessions to the new progressive left of the party . Bernie has already transformed the Dem party even without being the president .

It's okay if Bernie is too left, while not all of his ideas maybe great he can't pass any laws without congress and a lot of them won't get passed cause of that so we'll get something in between like a bargain, so we need Bernie's pressure and consistency of his track record and beliefs to get us a good bargain on healthcare, college debt and other issues. More importantly Bernie is anti-war unlike "I served in AFghanistan" - Pete and "lifelong Republican" - Warren. Need somebody like that as the executive, congress won't pass the radical liberal policies but like I said we'll get something close or at least much better than Butigegs plan.
 
It's okay if Bernie is too left, while not all of his ideas maybe great he can't pass any laws without congress and a lot of them won't get passed cause of that so we'll get something in between like a bargain, so we need Bernie's pressure and consistency of his track record and beliefs to get us a good bargain on healthcare, college debt and other issues. More importantly Bernie is anti-war unlike "I served in AFghanistan" - Pete and "lifelong Republican" - Warren. Need somebody like that as the executive, congress won't pass the radical liberal policies but like I said we'll get something close or at least much better than Butigegs plan.

I thought about that , and I feel that Bernman is too principled to walk back on his promises. If Bern delivers the presidency to demns then it'll be a bit like trump presidency where the president is a cult figure and any dems who wont fall in line will end up losing his support and probably be challenged in primaries with staunch bernie guys . I feel that warren ( fake liberal) or even pete are more center left and would probably be able to reach across the aisle more and compromise more.Just my $.02 . Trump for all his faults did deliver on the promises he made to his base. People like a guy who can walk teh talk . Bernie would be that guy for the left .
 
It's okay if Bernie is too left, while not all of his ideas maybe great he can't pass any laws without congress and a lot of them won't get passed cause of that so we'll get something in between like a bargain, so we need Bernie's pressure and consistency of his track record and beliefs to get us a good bargain on healthcare, college debt and other issues. More importantly Bernie is anti-war unlike "I served in AFghanistan" - Pete and "lifelong Republican" - Warren. Need somebody like that as the executive, congress won't pass the radical liberal policies but like I said we'll get something close or at least much better than Butigegs plan.

Bernie is a left-centre, at least from a European perspective. There’s plenty of politicians in Northern Europe who are far more left compared to Bernie.

The US media makes him seem like a fringe-politician which he really isn’t. It also doesn’t help that Bernie calls himself a Democratic Socialist when he really is a Social Democrat.
 
Bernie is a left-centre, at least from a European perspective. There’s plenty of politicians in Northern Europe who are far more left compared to Bernie.

The US media makes him seem like a fringe-politician which he really isn’t. It also doesn’t help that Bernie calls himself a Democratic Socialist when he really is a Social Democrat.

Yup, people are slow to realize this.
 
Bernie is a left-centre, at least from a European perspective. There’s plenty of politicians in Northern Europe who are far more left compared to Bernie.

The US media makes him seem like a fringe-politician which he really isn’t. It also doesn’t help that Bernie calls himself a Democratic Socialist when he really is a Social Democrat.

Well this ain't Europe. The whole country is built upon Capitalism and socialism wont work too ell here . We do need more checks and balances and universal healthcare but anything more than than will not make people too happy .
 
Bernie Sanders is firmly the front-runner in the race to become the Democratic challenger to Republican President Donald Trump, fresh from a victory this week in the second state-by-state contest. His support is fervent but is his party, let alone the country, ready to embrace such an unusual candidate?

Bernie Sanders likes to call his presidential campaign a revolution, but these days it feels more like a touring rock concert.

The Vermont senator may seem like an unlikely front-man for bands like Vampire Weekend and The Strokes, but both have served as his warm-up acts, playing at recent campaign rallies.

But the thousands of fans in packed arenas reserve their loudest cheers for the scruffy-haired 78-year-old candidate with a clipped Brooklyn accent.

After nearly a year marathon of rallies, meetings, debates and ground-laying, the Sanders campaign is now entering a sprint of near-nonstop activity that will carry it through dozens of states across the country - an impressive test of endurance for a man who just months ago was hospitalised for a heart attack.

"Bernie Sanders is the only candidate that has given me the courage to believe that we cannot only demand bold, radical change, but that it's actually very attainable," said Aletha Shapiro, who travelled to New Hampshire from Long Island, New York, to help the Sanders campaign.

"If the people stick together, we can actually put power back in the hands of the people."

The end result of all this effort was a split decision in Iowa, as former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg claimed the most delegates to the Democratic National Convention even though Sanders won a few thousand more votes.

In New Hampshire, Sanders finished narrowly ahead of Buttigieg again, with the two tied in the state's delegate count.

That didn't stop Sanders from claiming victory both in Iowa and New Hampshire on Tuesday night, however, and looking ahead to a showdown with Trump in November.

"The reason we won tonight in New Hampshire, we won last week in Iowa, is because of the hard work of so many volunteers," he said. "Let me say tonight that this victory here is the beginning of the end for Donald Trump."

The crowd, packed into a college gymnasium, responded with deafening applause, as though the volume of their cheers could will their beloved candidate to more victories in the days ahead.

"It was electric," said Scott Sandvik, a music teacher from Boston. "I really think it was a release of tension after a nail-biter of an election."

If the Sanders "revolution" does take hold - an outsider campaign pitted as much against the Democratic Party's establishment as it is the incumbent president - New Hampshire could very well be seen as where it all began.

But the campaign still has a long road ahead.

Another shot at the prize
Four years ago, Sanders also followed a tight result in Iowa with a victory in New Hampshire. That contest was actually more decisive - a 20-point win over Hillary Clinton, who was considered the prohibitive favourite entering the race.

Sanders' 2016 New Hampshire triumph, however, was a springboard into an empty pool.

He followed his win in the overwhelmingly white New England state with a narrow loss in Nevada and a drubbing in South Carolina, where the Democratic voting population is majority black. Although there were a few bright spots after that - victories in Michigan and Wisconsin - Clinton spent the next few months pulling away from Sanders in the nomination race.

Now Sanders is back, hoping history doesn't repeat itself. Facing a more crowded field, he appears to be in a much better position, as the nomination fight becomes a state-by-state slog on a battleground that stretches the breadth of the nation.

There is no Clinton machine waiting to do battle against the Sanders insurgency this time around. Instead, the Vermont senator heads out of New Hampshire along with a ragtag mix of candidates all scrambling for a foothold.

Joe Biden, the apparent front-runner through much of 2019, is grievously wounded by poor showings in in the first two contests. Elizabeth Warren, the other candidate appealing to the liberal wing of the Democratic Party, has finished behind Sanders twice now and shows no signs gaining any ground.

Meanwhile, the continued presence of Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar among the moderates of the party ensures middle-of-the road and establishment Democrats will remain divided.

Buttigieg has money, but a thin resume and doubts about his appeal to the more diverse rank-and-file of the Democratic Party. Klobuchar is counting on media coverage of her late surge in New Hampshire to make up for depleted campaign coffers and a virtually non-existent national organisation.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51507205
 
Bernie is a left-centre, at least from a European perspective. There’s plenty of politicians in Northern Europe who are far more left compared to Bernie.

The US media makes him seem like a fringe-politician which he really isn’t. It also doesn’t help that Bernie calls himself a Democratic Socialist when he really is a Social Democrat.

Yup, people are slow to realize this.

Yeah but everything is relative, for example in Pakistan the Republicans/Western conservatives would be considered liberal because of their lax attitudes towards drinking, fornicating, dating etc
 
Well this ain't Europe. The whole country is built upon Capitalism and socialism wont work too ell here . We do need more checks and balances and universal healthcare but anything more than than will not make people too happy .

Well could really use stricter gun control, better taxation - at least as good as it was before the 70s and also a high minimum wage, $7.25 doesn't cut it anymore.
 
Yeah but everything is relative, for example in Pakistan the Republicans/Western conservatives would be considered liberal because of their lax attitudes towards drinking, fornicating, dating etc

True. The left-right spectrum is relative.

I don’t agree with the latter part of your post though. Many Republicans in the US are even right-wing for Pakistani standards. They’re just like Pakistani conservatives: hawkish, want to bring in religious laws and to a certain degree homophobic.
 
Well this ain't Europe. The whole country is built upon Capitalism and socialism wont work too ell here . We do need more checks and balances and universal healthcare but anything more than than will not make people too happy .

There’s no socialist country in Europe as far as I know.

I think you’re referring to the The Nordic nations who are capitalist nations, and in many ways more pro-trade, pro-globalism and anti-protectionist compared to the US.
 
Well this ain't Europe. The whole country is built upon Capitalism and socialism wont work too ell here . We do need more checks and balances and universal healthcare but anything more than than will not make people too happy .

Actually this country is built on corporate socialism, but Americans are way too stupid to see this.
 
Bernie Sanders is firmly the front-runner in the race to become the Democratic challenger to Republican President Donald Trump, fresh from a victory this week in the second state-by-state contest. His support is fervent but is his party, let alone the country, ready to embrace such an unusual candidate?

Bernie Sanders likes to call his presidential campaign a revolution, but these days it feels more like a touring rock concert.

The Vermont senator may seem like an unlikely front-man for bands like Vampire Weekend and The Strokes, but both have served as his warm-up acts, playing at recent campaign rallies.

But the thousands of fans in packed arenas reserve their loudest cheers for the scruffy-haired 78-year-old candidate with a clipped Brooklyn accent.

After nearly a year marathon of rallies, meetings, debates and ground-laying, the Sanders campaign is now entering a sprint of near-nonstop activity that will carry it through dozens of states across the country - an impressive test of endurance for a man who just months ago was hospitalised for a heart attack.

"Bernie Sanders is the only candidate that has given me the courage to believe that we cannot only demand bold, radical change, but that it's actually very attainable," said Aletha Shapiro, who travelled to New Hampshire from Long Island, New York, to help the Sanders campaign.

"If the people stick together, we can actually put power back in the hands of the people."

The end result of all this effort was a split decision in Iowa, as former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg claimed the most delegates to the Democratic National Convention even though Sanders won a few thousand more votes.

In New Hampshire, Sanders finished narrowly ahead of Buttigieg again, with the two tied in the state's delegate count.

That didn't stop Sanders from claiming victory both in Iowa and New Hampshire on Tuesday night, however, and looking ahead to a showdown with Trump in November.

"The reason we won tonight in New Hampshire, we won last week in Iowa, is because of the hard work of so many volunteers," he said. "Let me say tonight that this victory here is the beginning of the end for Donald Trump."

The crowd, packed into a college gymnasium, responded with deafening applause, as though the volume of their cheers could will their beloved candidate to more victories in the days ahead.

"It was electric," said Scott Sandvik, a music teacher from Boston. "I really think it was a release of tension after a nail-biter of an election."

If the Sanders "revolution" does take hold - an outsider campaign pitted as much against the Democratic Party's establishment as it is the incumbent president - New Hampshire could very well be seen as where it all began.

But the campaign still has a long road ahead.

Another shot at the prize
Four years ago, Sanders also followed a tight result in Iowa with a victory in New Hampshire. That contest was actually more decisive - a 20-point win over Hillary Clinton, who was considered the prohibitive favourite entering the race.

Sanders' 2016 New Hampshire triumph, however, was a springboard into an empty pool.

He followed his win in the overwhelmingly white New England state with a narrow loss in Nevada and a drubbing in South Carolina, where the Democratic voting population is majority black. Although there were a few bright spots after that - victories in Michigan and Wisconsin - Clinton spent the next few months pulling away from Sanders in the nomination race.

Now Sanders is back, hoping history doesn't repeat itself. Facing a more crowded field, he appears to be in a much better position, as the nomination fight becomes a state-by-state slog on a battleground that stretches the breadth of the nation.

There is no Clinton machine waiting to do battle against the Sanders insurgency this time around. Instead, the Vermont senator heads out of New Hampshire along with a ragtag mix of candidates all scrambling for a foothold.

Joe Biden, the apparent front-runner through much of 2019, is grievously wounded by poor showings in in the first two contests. Elizabeth Warren, the other candidate appealing to the liberal wing of the Democratic Party, has finished behind Sanders twice now and shows no signs gaining any ground.

Meanwhile, the continued presence of Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar among the moderates of the party ensures middle-of-the road and establishment Democrats will remain divided.

Buttigieg has money, but a thin resume and doubts about his appeal to the more diverse rank-and-file of the Democratic Party. Klobuchar is counting on media coverage of her late surge in New Hampshire to make up for depleted campaign coffers and a virtually non-existent national organisation.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51507205

Yes, Bernie is the only one so far who is solid and can go all the way without going through a sudden drop in ranking, his base is solid. All others, particularly Buttigieg will run out of gas when he will enter states with lots of African American voters. I will not be surprised if Bloomberg surges , money talks.
 
The American jahiliya have utterly distorted the term socialism.. they have no idea what real socialism is. It’s even utterly stupid that Bernie himself refers to himself as a socialist.

Scandinavia, Canada, Europe, etc are believed by stupid brainwashed Americans as socialist countries where things are all doom and gloom.

No... they are NOT socialist countries. They are capitalist democracies with social welfare systems in place which are far far superior to anything US wishes had.

Nonetheless, I just don’t think Bernie’s ideas will fly with Swing voters.. I hope I am wrong though
 
Bern-man bernie VS I-love-men Pete . So we are down to center left-ish and a socialist .Damn this race is gonna transform America , doesn't matter who wins.

Pete will transform the US? He is another opportunistic neo-liberal, his policies change with who donates to his campaign. He will be status quo much like Biden.
 
Well could really use stricter gun control, better taxation - at least as good as it was before the 70s and also a high minimum wage, $7.25 doesn't cut it anymore.

Gun control - I'll give you . The problem is that its such a wedge issue along with abortion that its better to not touch it when running . We got gun loving people in all walks and parties. Gun rights cut across party lines .The $7.25 is fedral min wage. Nobody is stopping states to vote for a higher min wage . The issue is that the U.S is such a vast place that COL is way different for different states . $7.25 is still pretty low but the same $7.25 will go much farther in lets say Arizona than in cali .Its all relative.
 
Actually this country is built on corporate socialism, but Americans are way too stupid to see this.

Exactly!

Privatize profits and socialize losses. No republican batted an eye when Hank Paulson (GW's Treasury Sec) gave 750B in the first TARP round to all the Wall Street banks. Goldman Sachs was one of the biggest beneficiary of this largess and Hank Paulson owned over $500M in GS stocks.

There are talks of USAF buying new Boeing made F-15s (an aircraft that first flew in 1972!). This makes no sense when they are buying 5th Gen F-35 Stealth fighters (which by itseld is 1.5 Trillion over budget!)
This is being done to soften the loss Boeing has suffered due to the 737Max fiasco. If this is not corporate socialism then I don't know what is.
 
I thought about that , and I feel that Bernman is too principled to walk back on his promises. If Bern delivers the presidency to demns then it'll be a bit like trump presidency where the president is a cult figure and any dems who wont fall in line will end up losing his support and probably be challenged in primaries with staunch bernie guys . I feel that warren ( fake liberal) or even pete are more center left and would probably be able to reach across the aisle more and compromise more.Just my $.02 . Trump for all his faults did deliver on the promises he made to his base. People like a guy who can walk teh talk . Bernie would be that guy for the left .

Why are so-called "moderate democrats" running wild to get support from the other side and already talking about making compromises? How many compromises Trump and Republicans have made? None. Dems need to worry about independents and progressives, which is a bigger portion of the population compared to republicans who will cross the line and vote for Dems.

I will have 0 problems if Bernie supports a progressive challenger to oust some like Joe Manchin. We don't need senators who can't even rule out not supporting Trump in general election.
 
I have this feeling Trump is going to win again. Democrats have simply lost the plot.

They have been trying to impeach Trump since 2016 instead of trying to defeat his appeal/ideology. Even to this day, Democrats are incredibly disorganized.

Trump, at the end of the day, is an ideological candidate. Democrats need an equally appealing candidate. If Bernie doesn't get the nomination, I am afraid it should be too easy for Trump.

It has to be Bernie. Otherwise, forget it.
 
Last edited:
Well could really use stricter gun control, better taxation - at least as good as it was before the 70s and also a high minimum wage, $7.25 doesn't cut it anymore.

I will add money out of politics to that list, end of Citizens United.
 
Hilary is still salty about her loss. She is just trying to stay in limelight by making stupid accusations against Tulsi and Sanders. She has blamed everyone but herself for the 2016 loss. .

As an American Muslim and Pakistani-American I would not put Tulsi in the same sentence with Sanders, she is a Hindu nationalist that peddles Indian propaganda especially with regards to Kashmir and South Asian geopolitics, she is also a staunch zionist and supports the Assad regime in Syria that has killed countless innocent people. She no progressive especially considering her tacit support of the RSS/Modi.
 
As an American Muslim and Pakistani-American I would not put Tulsi in the same sentence with Sanders, she is a Hindu nationalist that peddles Indian propaganda especially with regards to Kashmir and South Asian geopolitics, she is also a staunch zionist and supports the Assad regime in Syria that has killed countless innocent people. She no progressive especially considering her tacit support of the RSS/Modi.

The Truth about Tulsi is known to most Dems and nobody wants her. She is a Russian plant, to break votes away from the probable candidates. Hilary was quite candid about her assessment of Tulsi in an interview and now Tusli is going to sue her over that comment. Then again nobody in the Dem establishment likes Bernie either!
 
23000 in Tacoma Dome for Bernie today, an omen for whats to come perhaps.

Bernie’s campaign is suddenly very very energized (out of nowhere) and I really don’t see this turning out with anybody other than Bernie as the winner in the primaries... if they try to cheat him out like last time, it will be pretty bad for the party.
 
As an American Muslim and Pakistani-American I would not put Tulsi in the same sentence with Sanders, she is a Hindu nationalist that peddles Indian propaganda especially with regards to Kashmir and South Asian geopolitics, she is also a staunch zionist and supports the Assad regime in Syria that has killed countless innocent people. She no progressive especially considering her tacit support of the RSS/Modi.

I am a Pakistani-American as well. I am not a supporter of Tulsi, but I do agree with her overall policy of negotiations and no more imperialistic wars.

Like I said not a big fan of her, but I will give credit where credit's due. Tulsi at one point was considered a rising star of the Democratic party, but everyone turned on her after she started to expose the hypocrisy of Democrats and decided to endorse Sanders in 2016. She showed more courage in 2016 than (then face of progressives) Elizabeth Warren.
 
I am a Pakistani-American as well. I am not a supporter of Tulsi, but I do agree with her overall policy of negotiations and no more imperialistic wars.

Like I said not a big fan of her, but I will give credit where credit's due. Tulsi at one point was considered a rising star of the Democratic party, but everyone turned on her after she started to expose the hypocrisy of Democrats and decided to endorse Sanders in 2016. She showed more courage in 2016 than (then face of progressives) Elizabeth Warren.

She has no courage, yeah she turned against the DNC however she's an Indian asset and her support of Indian imperialism/Hindutva in South Asia and particularly Kashmir is atrocious, I ain't ever casting a vote for her and any so called progressive should seriously research her ties to the RSS/Hindutva, a lot of these joebro type of guys think she's some kind of revolutionary, I would call her an ambassador of creepin' Hindutva.
 
Bernie’s campaign is suddenly very very energized (out of nowhere) and I really don’t see this turning out with anybody other than Bernie as the winner in the primaries... if they try to cheat him out like last time, it will be pretty bad for the party.

The worst if Bloomberg aka the Demcractic Trump ends up with the nomination, the man has a despicable past with racism, sexism, classism, corruption and has been in bed with the neocons/GOP for decades before deciding to join the DNC only a few years ago.
 
The Truth about Tulsi is known to most Dems and nobody wants her. She is a Russian plant, to break votes away from the probable candidates. Hilary was quite candid about her assessment of Tulsi in an interview and now Tusli is going to sue her over that comment. Then again nobody in the Dem establishment likes Bernie either!

I dislike both Hillary and Tulsi, I'd considered her an Indian asset rather than a Russian one. I'm just glad this Kashmiri/Muslim-hater won't ever rise to power as the DNC is against her albeit for different reasons lol.
 
I have this feeling Trump is going to win again. Democrats have simply lost the plot.

They have been trying to impeach Trump since 2016 instead of trying to defeat his appeal/ideology. Even to this day, Democrats are incredibly disorganized.

Trump, at the end of the day, is an ideological candidate. Democrats need an equally appealing candidate. If Bernie doesn't get the nomination, I am afraid it should be too easy for Trump.

It has to be Bernie. Otherwise, forget it.

While I agree only Bernie can beat Trumpet, I don't buy this whole "impeachment drama ruins our chances" argument. Throughout the Obama years the Republicans were relentlessly disrespecting him and pushing the Birther conspiracy theory, some even called to impeach him and then they kept moaning about Benghazi in 2016. Even in 2012 after Obama was reelected around 20 Republican states filed petitions for secession or thought of doing just cause he got a second term, being annoying is the oppositions job, people forget all the shenanigans the GOP pulled through Obama's 8 years.
 
I have this feeling Trump is going to win again. Democrats have simply lost the plot.

They have been trying to impeach Trump since 2016 instead of trying to defeat his appeal/ideology. Even to this day, Democrats are incredibly disorganized.

Trump, at the end of the day, is an ideological candidate. Democrats need an equally appealing candidate. If Bernie doesn't get the nomination, I am afraid it should be too easy for Trump.

It has to be Bernie. Otherwise, forget it.

Im hoping its Bernie, but Bloomberg has a chance as well. Never under estimate the power of money.

As far as impeaching him, the base wanted that. It would have hurt the democrats more if they did not do so.
 
Back
Top