What's new

A kid, a beach and a repairman: How Shahid Afridi helped unearth the 2010 spot-fix

Usman

T20I Debutant
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Runs
7,457
Post of the Week
3
From Game Changer:

It was in this spirit that I got hold of the original evidence in the corruption racket: phone messages that would eventually come into play against the players involved in the spot-fixing controversy. But when I took that evidence to the team management, what happened next doesn't inspire much confidence in those tasked with managing and running the affairs of Pakistan's national cricket team.

Here's my account: I was in Sri Lanka on a tour when the text messages of Mazhar Majeed - Salman Butt's 'agent and manager', who was also prosecuted - reached me, in transcript form. It is pure coincidence how I got hold of them. And it's got something to do with a kid, a beach and a repairman.

See, before the Sri Lanka tour, Majeed and his family had joined the cricket team during the championship. At one of the Sri Lankan beaches, Majeed's young son dropped his father's mobile phone in the water and it stopped working. When Majeed went back to England, he took his phone for repair to a mobile fix-it. The phone stayed at the shop for days. In a random coincidence, the shop owner turned out to be a friend of a friend of mine (this may sound like too much of a coincidence but the Pakistani community in England is quite closely connected). While fixing the phone, the shop-owner, who was asked to retrieve the messages, came across Majeed's messages to the players of the Pakistan team. Though he shouldn't have seen what he did, it was that leak from him to my friend and a few others (whom I won't name) that looped me in on the scam. Soon, word got around that something strange was happening with the cricket team. It was that leak which probably tipped off the reporting team from News of the World as well. It was sheer coincidence: a Pakistani repairman in London who couldn't keep his eyes and mouth shut about a broken cellphone from Sri Lanka. But I'm not surprised: when God has to execute justice, it happens in the most unexpected ways.

When I received those messages back in Sri Lanka, I showed them to Waqar Younis, then coach of the team. Unfortunately, he didn't escalate the matter and take it upstairs. Both Waqar and I thought it was something that would go away, something that wasn't as bad as it looked, just a dodgy conversation between the players and Majeed, at worst. But the messages weren't harmless banter - they were part of something larger, which the world would soon discover.

The rumour mill started churning. During the World T20 that year in the West Indies, Abdul Razzaq, one of our finest players in the shorter formats of the game and an old, solid hand in the team, told me in confidence that Salman, [Mohammad] Amir and [Mohammad] Asif 'weren't up to any good'. I shrugged off his comment. I told him he was imagining things, secretly hoping that their shady behaviour was just a sign of their youth and inexperience. I never told him about the messages I'd received from London,which were all the more damning, considering that a third-party player like Razzaq with a tendency to refrain from locker-room politics was of the same opinion: something wasn't right with Salman and the lads.

However, during that infamous England tour in the summer of 2010, before all hell broke loose with the News of the World sting of the spot-fixing scandal, I saw Mazhar Majeed and his cohorts make a re-entrance, lurking around and hanging out with the soon-to- be-accused players. For me, it was time to sound the alarm. That's when I decided to take up the issue officially with the team manager, Yawar Saeed. I put in a formal request that Mazhar Majeed should be distanced from the players, physically, and that no one in the team should associate with him even on a personal level. I had my own reputation at stake as well - I was the captain of the T20 side - and feared that any controversy would harm the performance of my squad.

When Saeed didn't take action, I showed him the text messages - I'd printed them out on paper. After going through them, Saeed, taken aback, eventually came up with a dismal response: 'What can we do about this, son? Not much. Not much.'

Time stood still for me as Saeed went into denial. I couldn't believe what I was hearing from such a senior official. 'Not much'? How could we do this to the team, to the country, to our millions of fans across the world? I didn't want to believe what he told me.

Disappointed, I didn't respond or protest much. But I kept the printout with me. Saeed didn't even bother asking for a copy of it. The next day, at a warm-up game in Northampton, Mazhar Majeed and his sidekicks were again hovering around the dressing room. So I approached Yawar Saeed once more and suggested that these guys shouldn't be seen anywhere near the team, as they didn't have the best of reputations.

By now, the exchanges between Majeed and the players via text messages had leaked out to others. Those in the Pakistani and the larger cricketing community knew that something was up. This is probably the same period when the News of the World executed their sting operation.

I had done my own due diligence on Mazhar Majeed and his posse by then. Through my friends and connections in England, I'd come to know that these guys were trouble. Thus, I wasn't just making these suggestions to the management of the Pakistan team based on second-hand SMS messages, or being a paranoid conspiracy theorist. I had it on good authority that these guys, who were officially engaged in conversations with Pakistani cricketers, were indeed not up to any good. So yes, I was building a case against Salman, Amir and Asif - one that could be dealt with internally.

However, the Pakistan team management continued to be in denial and said that nothing could be done about it. Frankly, I don't think the management gave a damn. It still was nobody's problem; that's why nobody wanted to tackle it or go to bat for it. Typical obfuscation and delay tactics; the Pakistani management's head was in the sand. Maybe the management was scared of the consequences. Maybe they were invested in these players as their favourites and future captains. Or maybe they didn't have any respect for their country or the game. I really can't say.

So there I was, on that cursed tour, playing match after match, with a rough idea that something was seriously wrong, knowing that the management wasn't really interested in listening to me. I started going insane, really. We played two T20s against Australia and won both. That provided some relief,of course. Then we started the first Test, which we lost as we didn't - couldn't, wouldn't - perform.

You see, doubt is our greatest enemy. Doubts had started setting in a few weeks ago. I remember I was in the dressing room in Dambulla, for the Asia Cup, playing against Sri Lanka, when Salman Butt got out in the second over. Abdul Razzaq warned me at that very moment that something was up. I brushed him aside and said that we all got paid enough as match fees. He just gave me a strange look and told me to watch out. In that game, I went on to score a century and forgot about his comment.

But when I came to England, I wasn't over it, clearly. I had signalled to the boys to stay away from Majeed and the likes. I had tried to talk to the coach and the management. Then the first Test began. Nothing changed. I could still see them lurking around the players and being part of the dressing room too.

In that first Test, at Lord's, I started doubting the whole project. What was wrong with Pakistan cricket? What was wrong with all of us?

That's when I decided to put an end to it, in my own way. In the middle of the match, around the fourth day, I told Salman Butt that he could take over.

I remember exactly when I made the decision. We were at 220 for 6. Marcus North was bowling. I swept and was taken in the deep. When the ball was in the air, I had taken my decision. I was done with all of this.

Yes, I shouldn't have quit my team. Yes, I should have played the second Test and not gone home. Yes, I was troubled, but I was in charge and should have done more. Much more.

So, I retired from Test cricket. Perhaps prematurely, but I had lost faith in the whole set-up, especially because the team management wasn't proactively investigating what was happening and instead letting the entire thing slide. I was angry and frustrated with everyone, including myself. That's why I didn't wrap up the Test series against Australia and decided to head back home to be with my family instead.

Yes. For the record, I gave up. I quit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, the only way to do something about corruption in the team is to ask the main suspect to take over the team and save your own backside by stepping down just in the nick of time. Well played Lala. Well played.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is really strange and irresponsible of Afridi. Weren't players supposed to report such incidents to ICC? Secondly, it is really messed up to give up captaincy to the person that was the main suspect. Thirdly, you're a Captain, bench these guys, or keep them out some how. If he really cared about the integrity of the team or the country, he wouldn't have done any of this. I'd rather him not know, than to know and do what he did, which was very little and weak. Disappointing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Afridi had suspicions about Butt yet handed the reins of captaincy over to him.

If Afridi had concerns, he should have reported them to ICC's ACU.
 
Good decision by Afridi to leave the team. We know you were not cheat. In Pakistani system the best thing is to step a side. I remember the case when Rashid & Basit with bag of evidences in their hands and they approached every concern authority but nobody bothered to listen. They took the same path and retired. In this country either you have to join the corrupt & cheat peoples or you have to isolate yourself for the sake of your own respect but you can't fight against them.
 
Either he was too naive or just didnt care much at that time.

How can't you report this or just quit the captaincy earlier if your demands are not met?

This is not just about getting your favourite bowler or batsman in it's about fixing! If Lala had acted earlier things could have been prevented. I think he knows this, but didn't care at the time.
 
Afridi had suspicions about Butt yet handed the reins of captaincy over to him.

If Afridi had concerns, he should have reported them to ICC's ACU.

No Afridi didn't handover the captaincy to butt, Butt was the vc and was automatic choice so it was PCB who appointed butt as captain.
 
Either he was too naive or just didnt care much at that time.

How can't you report this or just quit the captaincy earlier if your demands are not met?

This is not just about getting your favourite bowler or batsman in it's about fixing! If Lala had acted earlier things could have been prevented. I think he knows this, but didn't care at the time.

So many things behind this. He didn't have solid proof, just printout of double meaning messages & suspicious movement of players. Now the thing is if the trio wouldn't have prove cheater then what consequences afridi could have face. He don't want to labeled himself a traitor. In this sick society peoples sit the cheat and corrupt on their shoulders but called the traitor who speak the truth.
That is why why razzak kept his silence. He was observing to suspicious activities too but what he had done was only discussed it with afridi.
 
Then why did he recommend Salman to be his successor as Test captain?
 
One of the saddest and darkest chapters in the history of Pakistan cricket.

I remember waking up that Sunday morning and turning on the tv to see play delayed - heartbreaking to say the least.
 
One of the saddest and darkest chapters in the history of Pakistan cricket.

I remember waking up that Sunday morning and turning on the tv to see play delayed - heartbreaking to say the least.

For sure, but in hindsight, one of the best things to happen to Pakistan Cricket after Imran Khan!

Had 2010 not been exposed, who knows what situation Pakistan cricket would be in today.

Pakistan achieved so much after 2010, proving to the world, that if Pakistan cricket was not susceptible to corruption, then no team stands a chance with the mighty Pakistan!

Simply put, other teams beat us, because we let them. When we are free of corruption and play with full heart, we end up with performances like the CT17! :)
 
Last edited:
The rumour mill started churning. During the World T20 that year in the West Indies, Abdul Razzaq, one of our finest players in the shorter formats of the game and an old, solid hand in the team, told me in confidence that Salman, [Mohammad] Amir and [Mohammad] Asif 'weren't up to any good'.

So Amir, as per Afridi, had been at it for a good few months so his role not as naive as we thought it was.
 
So Amir, as per Afridi, had been at it for a good few months so his role not as naive as we thought it was.

Didn't Amir say as much during his interview with Atherton?
 
For sure, but in hindsight, one of the best things to happen to Pakistan Cricket after Imran Khan!

Had 2010 not been exposed, who knows what situation Pakistan cricket would be in today.

Pakistan achieved so much after 2010, proving to the world, that if Pakistan cricket was not susceptible to corruption, then no team stands a chance with the mighty Pakistan!

Simply put, other teams beat us, because we let them. When we are free of corruption and play with full heart, we end up with performances like the CT17! :)

The best thing about it was that Pakistan appointed Misbah-ul-Haq as skipper and with him in charge there was no way that any corruption would be possible from the players.
 
1 thing to note here is that Amir was not as naive and innocent as we thought. Afridi should have reported this to the ICC if our management didn't want to do anything.

Anyone who fixes should not be allowed to represent Pakistan again. Amir has set a bad precedent. By fixing and he allowed to play Pakistan again. Why should we select players who are more interested in making money than wearing the shirt with pride?

We need to stay far away from these characters. It's not something that fans and future players will be proud of. We need players who want to improve their game and players who will give a 100 percent on the field. Unfortunately a majority of Pakistan players these days don't have desire to improve once they are settled in the team.

For Pakistan to become 1 of the top teams again, we need to make a lot of changes in our domestic cricket and changes with the way we develop cricketers through media training and in the way they are brought up once they reach the international stage and just before.
 
The best thing about it was that Pakistan appointed Misbah-ul-Haq as skipper and with him in charge there was no way that any corruption would be possible from the players.

A huge debt of gratitude to Misbah and I am surprised that he had nothing to say about this for Misbah in his book.
 
Im a critic of Afridi and always have been, but if what he wrote is true, then fine by me.

Look afridi did report his findings to team manager Yawar Saeed. He reported to the coaches aswell and that was all that was required. Now Yawar Saeed should had reported to ASCU or taken action.

Problem here is Afridi himself wasnt sure as for him he was seeing such things for the first time.

2nd, Afridi has admitted his mistake in this section of the book. He has admitted that he should had not given the captaincy away. He has admitted his mistake and fair enough.

Also, this shows that Amir was not soo innocent, him and others were in it for a long time. I wonder what [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] will say on Asif now.


I would also like to add that this is why i appreciate what Najem Sethi did with Mohd Irfan and Nawaz. If one was not reporting then strict action is required by to board to ban such players who dont report.

Najem Sethi saved PSL 2.
 
Last edited:
A huge debt of gratitude to Misbah and I am surprised that he had nothing to say about this for Misbah in his book.

Going by the book, i bet Afridi also has differences with Misbah for he did not select him the Champions Trophy 2012 (when IQbal Qasim threw Misbah under the bus)

But as someone said earlier, due both not working on a charity project together, Afridi wouldn't want to bash Misbah in his book.

OH well, i was hoping to get an insight on the Afridi-Misbah clash, whether that ever existed or not. Maybe when Afridi comes up with a Volume 2 of his book, only then we will know.
 
One of the saddest and darkest chapters in the history of Pakistan cricket.

I remember waking up that Sunday morning and turning on the tv to see play delayed - heartbreaking to say the least.

In a perverse sort of way, we needed the scandal to cleanse the team of this sort of crap, which had been going on for 20 years. I would be amazed that if it hasn't since as we have seen with the PSL, IPL and more recently in SL with Jayasuriya. As much as we curse Notw , they did what the board couldn't do, and for that alone I am grateful to them.
 
Im a critic of Afridi and always have been, but if what he wrote is true, then fine by me.

Look afridi did report his findings to team manager Yawar Saeed. He reported to the coaches aswell and that was all that was required. Now Yawar Saeed should had reported to ASCU or taken action.

Problem here is Afridi himself wasnt sure as for him he was seeing such things for the first time.

2nd, Afridi has admitted his mistake in this section of the book. He has admitted that he should had not given the captaincy away. He has admitted his mistake and fair enough.

Also, this shows that Amir was not soo innocent, him and others were in it for a long time. I wonder what [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] will say on Asif now.


I would also like to add that this is why i appreciate what Najem Sethi did with Mohd Irfan and Nawaz. If one was not reporting then strict action is required by to board to ban such players who dont report.

Najem Sethi saved PSL 2.

The fixing had gone on for years. When Saleem Malik ran out Saqlain in Toronto, it was obvious as daylight to every man and his dog that he was fixing. The PCB are useless and unprofessional and they are the cancer that have allowed corrupt players to flourish.
 
The fixing had gone on for years. When Saleem Malik ran out Saqlain in Toronto, it was obvious as daylight to every man and his dog that he was fixing. The PCB are useless and unprofessional and they are the cancer that have allowed corrupt players to flourish.

you are right, but Najem Sethi took the right decision by giving short term bans to players who dont bother to report.

Atleast now Pakistani players will report approaches.
 
Looks like Salman Butt's resentment that Afridi was the whistle blower looks to have more credibility. I wonder if the ICC anti corruption officials can interview Afridi with regards to why was he mum for so long regarding his suspicions.
 
you are right, but Najem Sethi took the right decision by giving short term bans to players who dont bother to report.

Atleast now Pakistani players will report approaches.

It was but the problem is a structural one with the PCB where dealing with difficult problems is avoided.
 
Afridi had suspicions about Butt yet handed the reins of captaincy over to him.

If Afridi had concerns, he should have reported them to ICC's ACU.

Looks like Salman Butt's resentment that Afridi was the whistle blower looks to have more credibility. I wonder if the ICC anti corruption officials can interview Afridi with regards to why was he mum for so long regarding his suspicions.

Afridi seems not to understand that he has now confessed in writing to a serious breach of the ICC Anti-Corruption Code continuously from 2010 to the present day.

And the minimum sentence for failing to notify the ICC - not Waqar Younis or Yawar Saeed - is the same 5 year ban that Amir, Asif and Butt received.
 
Afridi seems not to understand that he has now confessed in writing to a serious breach of the ICC Anti-Corruption Code continuously from 2010 to the present day.

And the minimum sentence for failing to notify the ICC - not Waqar Younis or Yawar Saeed - is the same 5 year ban that Amir, Asif and Butt received.

I have just re-read the ICC Report into Amir, Asif and Butt.

According to the footnote on Page 4, Afridi’s failure to make an immediate full report to the ICC’s Anti-Corruption Unit breached Article 2.4.2 of the Anti-Corruption Code, and required a minimum ban of 5 years.
 
Afridi seems not to understand that he has now confessed in writing to a serious breach of the ICC Anti-Corruption Code continuously from 2010 to the present day.

And the minimum sentence for failing to notify the ICC - not Waqar Younis or Yawar Saeed - is the same 5 year ban that Amir, Asif and Butt received.

Lol. Hyperbole. Always exaggerating

Icc requires players to atleast report team managment. Which afridi did.
 
So Amir, as per Afridi, had been at it for a good few months so his role not as naive as we thought it was.
This is covered in paragraph 123 of page 43 of the ICC Report.

There is evidence of Butt exchanging corrupt SMS traffic with Mazhar Majeed in the West Indies in May 2010.

There is extensive corrupt SMS traffic featuring Amir, but only during BOTH the Oval and Lords Tests.

I should add, there is no such SMS or phone call traffic involving Asif. In addition, Asif was the only one of the four (the 3 players plus Majeed) not to have marked News of the World banknotes in his possession.

The evidence is overwhelming - especially when you bear in mind that Majeed confessed on tape to other members of the team fixing the Sydney Test eight months earlier.

As per the ICC Tribunal chaired by Michael Beloff QC:

1. Amir and Butt were corrupt for some time and were paid for their corruption.

2. Asif was not corrupt, and was not paid for any action. But he eventually gave in to Majeed’s request for him to bowl a single no-ball “as a sign for a wealthy Indian gambler”, and while he was not paid to do so, the act of bowling a deliberate no-ball even for no reward constituted an offence.

Having read Afridi’s account today, I’m clear as before about the guilt of Amir and Butt. But as of today, I consider Afridi to have confessed to a more serious offence than Asif was found guilty of.
 
Lol. Hyperbole. Always exaggerating

Icc requires players to atleast report team managment. Which afridi did.
That is categorically incorrect.

The Anti-Corruption Code in place in 2010 - and all players attended a lecture on it - required that any information about corruption be reported by the player to ACSU - the ICC’s Anti-Corruption Unit.

This in part was to ensure that team management - who earn much less money - could not be bribed to ignore or conceal fixing.

The ICC’s Report cannot be uploaded here because every page has printed on it a warning that to do so breaches the 1981 Contempt of Court Act.

But the final paragraph of Page 4 is clear: a player must notify ACSU without undue delay. Notifying your own management but not ACSU is itself an offence, because by notifying your management any day that passes without notifying ACSU - and Afridi has just confessed to at least a 3,100 day delay - is an offence.
 
Junaids is right. We all know Yawar Saeed was hopelessly ineffective as team manager as were the PCB.

So when you have such serious suspicions about three of your teammates, one of them your vice captain and successor no less, you go straight to the ICC !

Instead Afridi sat on this and wants to be patted on the back years later for saying I saw it coming.
 
Junaids is right. We all know Yawar Saeed was hopelessly ineffective as team manager as were the PCB.

So when you have such serious suspicions about three of your teammates, one of them your vice captain and successor no less, you go straight to the ICC !

Instead Afridi sat on this and wants to be patted on the back years later for saying I saw it coming.

Yep, if anything this shows how brainless Afridi was.
 
Question to everyone.

How many of the current and former Pakistani player would have gone to ICC after speaking to their manager, who they were probably more comfortable speaking to, ignored everything the player had told them?
 
Lol. Hyperbole. Always exaggerating

Icc requires players to atleast report team managment. Which afridi did.

Question to everyone.

How many of the current and former Pakistani player would have gone to ICC after speaking to their manager, who they were probably more comfortable speaking to, ignored everything the player had told them?

The Amir/Asif/Butt ICC Hearing was told by counsel for the PCB that EVERY Pakistan player had attended an Anti-Corruption Workshop in which they signed a form saying that they would report any information about corruption direct to the ICC and risked an automatic 5 year ban if they failed to do so.
 
The Amir/Asif/Butt ICC Hearing was told by counsel for the PCB that EVERY Pakistan player had attended an Anti-Corruption Workshop in which they signed a form saying that they would report any information about corruption direct to the ICC and risked an automatic 5 year ban if they failed to do so.

I get that part.

How many players would have bypass PCB straight to ICC? Even when after manager said "what can we do"?

Not too many.
 
This just (re) confirms how weak Afridi is as an individual. I mean according him this was going on for a LONG time. He was the captain, he always talks about being the senior and about having impact. Why did he keep playing them?

He knew Butt was the ring leader but gave the captaincy to him so he can ruin PAK cricket?!

Afridi already was low on respect given how is last couplenof years whent before finally retiring.

Fact is he didnt have the guts and also didnt have it in him to play TEST CRICKET.

He came back running once the white ball circus started.

Very very poor from him but at the same time not really a surprise.
 
Seems like half of British Pakistani community knew about it, much before the scandal broke out. With this new knowledge that the fixing was going on much before that particular test, shouldn't ICC reinvestigate the matter and come up with harsher punishment? It's not about whether the 3 are relevant anymore, but punishment should commensurate the crime.
 
Doesnt make any sense whatsoever

Why didnt Afridi go straight to the ICC with this if no one from the management was listening Also why quit when you know the stand in VC would be the captain - the same player you suspect of th fixing

Either afridi is very very stupid or hes making all this up
 
The Lala circus in full swing , what a joke this guy has become , doesn’t know how to cheat or lie.. lol
 
"Ijaz Butt had given me 3 names to choose from as Vice Captains in 2010; Salman Butt was a young player and in form so I said choose him" : Shahid Afridi

"When we went to England, then I came to know that some bad things were happening and I shared that with the management and told them I am leaving so you guys take care of it" : Shahid Afridi
 
Last edited:
So Amir, as per Afridi, had been at it for a good few months so his role not as naive as we thought it was.

Amir's age was also wrong. When he was found guilty he was lucky he did not go to an adult prison.

I still don't get why Amir never went to other senior players like Afridi to tell them what was going on.
 
Looks like Salman Butt's resentment that Afridi was the whistle blower looks to have more credibility. I wonder if the ICC anti corruption officials can interview Afridi with regards to why was he mum for so long regarding his suspicions.

Interesting point.

If Yawar did nothing, then surely go to the ACSU.
 
Junaids is right. We all know Yawar Saeed was hopelessly ineffective as team manager as were the PCB.

So when you have such serious suspicions about three of your teammates, one of them your vice captain and successor no less, you go straight to the ICC !

Instead Afridi sat on this and wants to be patted on the back years later for saying I saw it coming.

The team management were totally incompetent on that tour. The team manager and his deputy were basically on a holiday to the UK.
 
Amir's age was also wrong. When he was found guilty he was lucky he did not go to an adult prison.

I still don't get why Amir never went to other senior players like Afridi to tell them what was going on.

Don't western countries like the UK have advanced technology and methods to confirm a person's real age? Pcb needs to demand original birth certificates of cricketers under their wings and verify their authenticity
 
The team management were totally incompetent on that tour. The team manager and his deputy were basically on a holiday to the UK.

Yawar Saeed is no more so we may not know the truth. But Afridi mentioned he told Waqar many times as well and all Waqar did was shrug his shoulders and brush it under the carpet.

Maybe ICC can confirm if Afridi did any whistleblowing back then?
 
Doesnt make any sense whatsoever

Why didnt Afridi go straight to the ICC with this if no one from the management was listening Also why quit when you know the stand in VC would be the captain - the same player you suspect of th fixing

Either afridi is very very stupid or hes making all this up

Or get one of his associates to go to the ICC.
 
Regarding the Shoaib Akhtar Bay hitting controversy in 2007, he mentioned that it was a usual evening of deep banter bw the two and that they both had a ball of a time on that tour before that incident and it just happened that Afridi was on top that specific moment, in fact he blamed Asif for unnecessarily butting in and disrespecting Akhtar and going over the top and Akhtar lost it in a moment of madness. At the time under Nasim Ashraf the overall environment in the PCB was very poor for the senior players and the pcb was hell bent on promoting youngsters like Malik, Salman Butt etc and it was the worst dressing room environment in his career
 
Don't western countries like the UK have advanced technology and methods to confirm a person's real age? Pcb needs to demand original birth certificates of cricketers under their wings and verify their authenticity

The UK courts will have relied on information given to them by Amir's legal team, PCB etc if no birth certificate was available.
 
Yawar Saeed is no more so we may not know the truth. But Afridi mentioned he told Waqar many times as well and all Waqar did was shrug his shoulders and brush it under the carpet.

Maybe ICC can confirm if Afridi did any whistleblowing back then?

One of the Rana brothers was the assistant manager.

Whenever I saw him on tour in 2010 it looked like he was having a helluva time.
 
The UK courts will have relied on information given to them by Amir's legal team, PCB etc if no birth certificate was available.

Shocking oversight. Even in juvenile criminal trials, the courts direct the medical authorities to perform tests to confirm the suspects real age. It happened in the Shahzeb Khan Shahrukh Jatoi murder case where the defence kept claiming the murder suspect was a minor but the courts directed the medical authorities to perform tests and find out the truth and the tests confirmed he was above 18 contrary to the claims made by his legal team
 
Amir's age was also wrong. When he was found guilty he was lucky he did not go to an adult prison.

I still don't get why Amir never went to other senior players like Afridi to tell them what was going on.

How do we know Afridi is telling the truth?
 
The fixing had gone on for years. When Saleem Malik ran out Saqlain in Toronto, it was obvious as daylight to every man and his dog that he was fixing. The PCB are useless and unprofessional and they are the cancer that have allowed corrupt players to flourish.

You should watch the whole benson & hedges odi series down under in '93. I had the VHS tape and except for the first match that Pakistan won against the windies, they lost all remaining 7 or 8 in a row and did so in blatantly obvious and deliberate manner. It was both painful and comical to watch. Malik Saab pulling out of third run with a fake hamstring injury leaving poor Ramiz stranded middle of the pitch. Wasim bowling wides and no balls that even club bowlers would be embarrassed of. So it had been happening long before Toronto and both Malik and Akram were central characters, rather ring leaders.
 
You should watch the whole benson & hedges odi series down under in '93. I had the VHS tape and except for the first match that Pakistan won against the windies, they lost all remaining 7 or 8 in a row and did so in blatantly obvious and deliberate manner. It was both painful and comical to watch. Malik Saab pulling out of third run with a fake hamstring injury leaving poor Ramiz stranded middle of the pitch. Wasim bowling wides and no balls that even club bowlers would be embarrassed of. So it had been happening long before Toronto and both Malik and Akram were central characters, rather ring leaders.

Damn, that was before my time but please share more
 
How do we know Afridi is telling the truth?

Regarding my points:

Afridi won't have known Amir's age.

Regarding Amir not going to other senior players, he may have thought they were all in on it.
 
That is categorically incorrect.

The Anti-Corruption Code in place in 2010 - and all players attended a lecture on it - required that any information about corruption be reported by the player to ACSU - the ICC’s Anti-Corruption Unit.

This in part was to ensure that team management - who earn much less money - could not be bribed to ignore or conceal fixing.

The ICC’s Report cannot be uploaded here because every page has printed on it a warning that to do so breaches the 1981 Contempt of Court Act.

But the final paragraph of Page 4 is clear: a player must notify ACSU without undue delay. Notifying your own management but not ACSU is itself an offence, because by notifying your management any day that passes without notifying ACSU - and Afridi has just confessed to at least a 3,100 day delay - is an offence.

2.4.2 does not apply in this case. It would have if Afridi himself had been approached and he had failed to report that. But 2.4.5 does and if Afridi did have the sort of conclusive proof that he claims he did (I doubt he had anything material at that point) then he had a duty to report it. I think it is only to burnish his own reputation and add masala to his book that he is exaggerating his role and the extent of his knowledge but it will surely put him in trouble with the ICC.
 
Back
Top