What's new

Age-group cricket serves a limited purpose, says Rahul Dravid

giri26

T20I Debutant
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Runs
8,468
Post of the Week
1
Felicitations can sometimes be tricky affairs. Organisations do them ostensibly to honour people with extraordinary achievements but fail to strike a balance between that and their personal desire to gain maximum publicity for the same.

It was no different at a function for Mithali Raj and Jhulan Goswami. Organised by the FICCI Ladies Organisation (FLO) here on Tuesday with Rahul Dravid as the felicitator, the event soon descended into a chaotic affair.

While Mithali supported the idea of a women’s IPL saying, “It will lead to having a big pool of players and will give a push to the domestic and international cricket,” Jhulan admitted there were still issues in the Indian society that made sports as a career for women a problematic affair.

Dravid hailed the rise of women role models in the sport. “It’s fantastic to see the energy built up around women’s sport in general and cricket specially. Young girls now have their own role models to look up to, they don’t need a Rahul Dravid or a Sachin Tendulkar,” he told The Hindu after the function.

“One of the things I realised when I took over the Under-19 team was that people stay on and play too much of Under-19. They want to keep playing U-19 cricket, which is very dangerous.”

“So we took the decision of not allowing any player to play two U-19 World Cups. This meant five of the players from the last WC, who are eligible for the coming WC in January, won’t be playing.”

The India Under-19 and A team coach added that it was important to strike a balance between age-group cricket and the top level.

“Age group cricket has a purpose, but the players then have to go and ultimately play men’s cricket,” he said.

Given the myriad of avenues available for players now, Dravid admitted Under-23 cricket was not exactly very prominent, but insisted it still had a role to play. “I don’t think it will ever be redundant completely.

“Yes, the quality of cricket might not always be great but it still provides an opportunity for players. It’s hard to make it to the state teams at the Under-19 level. Not everyone can play for India and not everyone can make the state team immediately after Under-19. U-23 gives you a platform to push your case. It’s an important bridge,” he said.

And while Dravid was not too bothered with the new rules on bat sizes — It will have an impact (but) it’s the quality of pitch and ground which matters in cricket, not the bat, he insisted

http://www.thehindu.com/sport/crick...mited-purpose-says-dravid/article19913511.ece
 
Last edited:
Rahul Dravid makes a good point here in his interview
 
Under 19 can be good for finding talent but IMO isn't the be all and end all.
 
Back
Top