What's new

Allan Donald vs Wasim Akram : Who’s the better Test bowler?

S

Statpadder Inc

Local Club Regular
Joined
Sep 28, 2023
Runs
1,560
Both Donald and wasim were 2 of the greatest fast bowlers ever, but if you had to pick one

Allan Donald stats:
Matches - 72
Wickets - 330
Average - 22.25

Wasim akram stats :
Matches - 104
Wickets - 414
Average - 23.62
 
Allan Donald has himself mentioned on numerous occasions that Wasim was the most skillful bowler of his generation.
 
If Akram had played all his home tests in South Africa than his wickets tally would have been 500.
 
greatest said:
If Akram had played all his home tests in South Africa than his wickets tally would have been 500.
Click to expand...
Well, Donald lost his prime years to apartheid. He still averages in the teens in the subcontinent.

Akram averages almost 40 in South Africa
 
Statpadder Inc said:
Well, Donald lost his prime years to apartheid. He still averages in the teens in the subcontinent.

Akram averages almost 40 in South Africa
Click to expand...
Akram played only a few Test in South Africa and that too when he was 30 plus and past his prime.
 
Will take Donald over Wasim as the superior Test bowler. But in an all-time World XI, I'll take Akram as he is comfortably the greatest left arm pacer and brought variety to an attack which is extremely important while Donald won't make a World XI .


From a purely Test bowling perspective from that era I'd go

McGrath > Ambrose> Donald > Wasim = Pollock > Walsh > Waqar
 
Statpadder Inc said:
@Buffet , @Ab Fan , @kron
Any thoughts, would love to hear what you have to say on this
Click to expand...
Personal preference wasim. In terms of ability they are very even. It's a tough one for me.

Clearly in odi wasim is better.

In tests, Donald had the advantage of playing in south african conditions.

Both dint do too great vs australia. I am going with donald as the better player.
 
Nikhil_cric said:
Will take Donald over Wasim as the superior Test bowler. But in an all-time World XI, I'll take Akram as he is comfortably the greatest left arm pacer and brought variety to an attack which is extremely important while Donald won't make a World XI .


From a purely Test bowling perspective from that era I'd go

McGrath > Ambrose> Donald > Wasim = Pollock > Walsh > Waqar
Click to expand...
I agree but do consider that Akram made his debut in 1984/85 and was past his prime by 1996. I think by then he had already played 70 plus Tests. On the other hand Donald started peaking from 1996 and by that time he had played half the Tests Akram had played.
 
Correct I meant wasim the better player. Donald slight edge in bowling. Like a feather
 
greatest said:
I agree but do consider that Akram made his debut in 1984/85 and was past his prime by 1996. I think by then he had already played 70 plus Tests. On the other hand Donald started peaking from 1996 and by that time he had played half the Tests Akram had played.
Click to expand...


It's close. But Wasim wasn't a great Test bowler in the 80's. His peak was in the 90's primarily.

Donald was a really good Test bowler until his very last season when the Aussies hammered him in 01/02 - his last series.

Wasim's unquestionably the greater cricketer( Test century in Australia, World Cup match winner etc.)
 
Akram was a much better odi bowler, absolutely no debate ( he is a top 3 in the format).

But Donald would have taken 500 wickets @22 or something if he hadn't misses a chunk of his career due to apartheid
 
Allan Donald debuted at the age of 27 because of apartheid. So stats will be skewed against him.

In tests, Donald, he also dominated India in India so wasn't a home bully. Overall Wasim Akram, because in ODIs his legacy is so great including WC win, also him being a left hander. All formats combines I will take Akram ahead of anyone except McGrath.
 
Nikhil_cric said:
It's close. But Wasim wasn't a great Test bowler in the 80's. His peak was in the 90's primarily.

Donald was a really good Test bowler until his very last season when the Aussies hammered him in 01/02 - his last series.

Wasim's unquestionably the greater cricketer( Test century in Australia, World Cup match winner etc.)
Click to expand...
Akram was only 17 when he made his Test debut and he was improving every series. He finally became a lethal fast bowler in the 1989/90 series against Australia. Before that he used to give good support to Imran Khan who was Man of the Series in away series wins against India, England and a close fought series in the West Indies. Until 1989 Imran was dominating the Pakistani pace attack, home and away.
 
Donald was just a super quick bowler in his initial years more like Devon Malcolm. His bowling improved from 1995 when Bob Woolmer started working with him as coach at Warwickshire and South Africa.
 
Swashbuckler said:
Allan Donald debuted at the age of 27 because of apartheid. So stats will be skewed against him.

In tests, Donald, he also dominated India in India so wasn't a home bully. Overall Wasim Akram, because in ODIs his legacy is so great including WC win, also him being a left hander. All formats combines I will take Akram ahead of anyone except McGrath.
Click to expand...
Akram unfortunately didn't played in India when he was at his peak in the early to mid 90's . When he toured in 1999 he was in his last few years of international cricket.
 
In ODI, Wasim.

In the Test, I rate both at the same level. Sometimes I may put Donald over Wasim and sometimes I may put Wasim over Donald. Not much difference.

Overall, I will rate Wasim higher considering all formats.
 
Statpadder Inc said:
Akram was a much better odi bowler, absolutely no debate ( he is a top 3 in the format).

But Donald would have taken 500 wickets @22 or something if he hadn't misses a chunk of his career due to apartheid
Click to expand...
True, but you have to rate bowlers based on whatever they did. For all we know, Donald may have been better than anyone in history if he had played international cricket earlier, but we can't rate anyone based on speculations.
 
Statpadder Inc said:
Well, Donald lost his prime years to apartheid. He still averages in the teens in the subcontinent.

Akram averages almost 40 in South Africa
Click to expand...
One venue does not make that much difference. Overall, Wasim was good in all conditions. We have seen enough of him.
 
Donald is underrated, he was very highly skillful bowler too. It's a myth that he was all pace and nothing else.

Donald could swing the ball both ways. Once Pollock debuted, he mastered reverse swing too and took up the responsibility with the old ball, had a very good yorker and was obviously lightning pace.

In terms of comparison with Wasim, I think Wasim is probably a shade better than Donald because he is a World Cup winner with a player of match performance in Finals and his record vs Australia, who were probably the top side was better than Donald.

Donald, nevertheless, was beast in all conditions, he did enough damage in few games he played in Asia and inspite of debuting at 26, he is an all time great of the game and arguably among the top 10 fast bowlers of all-time.

He is behind McGrath, Wasim and Ambrose only due to losing few years of his peak due to apartheid ban and bottling in World Cup 1999 while McGrath and Wasim were WC winners.
 
Wasim Akram & Waqar Younis were terrific ODI bowlers but their test records were bit underwhelming

Yes both had good stats in test cricket but that was partly bcoz of their ability to clean up the tail with reverse ( helped by doctored balls)

In pure skill & ability McGrath, Ambrose , Walsh & Donald were better than Wasim & Waqar in test cricket
 
Wasim Akram is far ahead of Donald in every department. We can better compare both of them in white ball cricket.
 
Cricket Warrior said:
Wasim Akram is far ahead of Donald in every department. We can better compare both of them in white ball cricket.
Click to expand...
How is he far ahead with an inferior average and strike rate. It's pretty neck and neck.

He is far ahead in odi cricket though, but not in tests
 
Buffet said:
True, but you have to rate bowlers based on whatever they did. For all we know, Donald may have been better than anyone in history if he had played international cricket earlier, but we can't rate anyone based on speculations.
Click to expand...
I think Donald did enough in tests to put him slightly ahead of akram
 
Dr_Bassim said:
There can be none like Mcgrath.
Click to expand...
So true! No bowler during a career for 10 years or more constantly bullied almost every great/good batsman of his time like McGrath did. Yes, McGrath didn't just have the better of everyone, he outright bullied them in the long run. There's not a single criteria where McGrath doesn't come out among the top. He is the GOAT in Test cricket. In ODI's from performing in World Cups, to World Cup Finals, Tournament finals, Tournament KO's, he comes out on top in every criteria.
 
Wasim is definitely better than Allan here. I don't think that Wasim will not be a choice for many when they make a dream 11 bowling line up.
 
Statpadder Inc said:
Well, Donald lost his prime years to apartheid. He still averages in the teens in the subcontinent.

Akram averages almost 40 in South Africa
Click to expand...

Akram played only 2 matches in SA.
Even Donald averages 33 in Pak as he only played 2 matches there. So less than 5 matches shouldn't be a sample size.
I'll choose Akram over Donald.
Donald played 32 less matches than Akram. It would've been extremely difficult for him to sustain that average for those many matches.
Also, do take Pakistan's fielding into account and compare it with SA's fielding.
Donald till late 90s was SA's prime bowler while Akram had to compete with Waqar for wickets.
Also, take into Akram's diabetes into the equation in his last 5-6 years.

So yes, Akram will be my choice.
 
worldlife92 said:
Akram played only 2 matches in SA.
Even Donald averages 33 in Pak as he only played 2 matches there. So less than 5 matches shouldn't be a sample size.
I'll choose Akram over Donald.
Donald played 32 less matches than Akram. It would've been extremely difficult for him to sustain that average for those many matches.
Also, do take Pakistan's fielding into account and compare it with SA's fielding.
Donald till late 90s was SA's prime bowler while Akram had to compete with Waqar for wickets.
Also, take into Akram's diabetes into the equation in his last 5-6 years.

So yes, Akram will be my choice.
Click to expand...
Valid points, but Donald lost the best years of his career due to apartheid, otherwise he picks up 500 wickets or so.

Donald being the strike bowler had more pressure to single handedly deliver, the best bowlers hunt in pairs.

They are both pretty equal for me, I personally prefer donald by a slight margin but you couldn't go wrong with wasim
 
I love Donald but it might make more sense to compare him with Darren Gough and Waqar Younis; all three shared similar qualities.

Wasim was a cricketing miracle, there’s not anything he couldn’t do as a bowler; he is the most complete bowler of all time, he did underachieve and I think we all know why; but despite that he had an incredible career, Donald would never make any XI or be picked in any circumstances over Wasim.
 
The topic of this thread is - Who is a better Test bowler - Wasim Akram or Allan Donald?
Allan Donald is a superior Test bowler in terms of speed and skills.

On a side note: Wasim Akram is one of my all-time top 5 pace bowlers.
 
kron said:
Kidding right. Wasim yea case can be made for either being better. Wasim is the better player. As a bowler they are roughly equal.

But no way anderson<<<<< mcg.

Mcg is the goat
Click to expand...
Numbers always define you in terms of greatness so when comparing Anderson to McGrath on paper Anderson appears to be ahead.
 
Cricket Warrior said:
Numbers always define you in terms of greatness so when comparing Anderson to McGrath on paper Anderson appears to be ahead.
Click to expand...
How? Bowling average shows otherwise. Performance vs top sides says otherwise. Just longevity alone isn't enough. Although Anderson has been a true great bowler in the last 10 years.
 
greatest said:
Akram unfortunately didn't played in India when he was at his peak in the early to mid 90's . When he toured in 1999 he was in his last few years of international cricket.
Click to expand...
Akram played in the 1987 series ....
 
Human786 said:
Akram played in the 1987 series ....
Click to expand...
Yes he did.
He was a 19 year old rookie and that series except the last Test was played on slow and dead pitches. Pacers from both sides struggled to get wickets. Btw, Akram did took 5 wickets at Kolkata.
 
greatest said:
Yes he did.
He was a 19 year old rookie and that series except the last Test was played on slow and dead pitches. Pacers from both sides struggled to get wickets. Btw, Akram did took 5 wickets at Kolkata.
Click to expand...
He had played international cricket for 2 years by then. Not an experienced player, but not a rookie for sure.
 
It's like comparing apples and oranges.

One was a superb right handed bowler and the other a left armer.
One also played on dust bowls and the other had gun fielders behind and in front of the stumps.

Let's just say both were brilliant
 
Hitman said:
He had played international cricket for 2 years by then. Not an experienced player, but not a rookie for sure.
Click to expand...
Agree mate!
But in those days hardly much cricket was played. All I want to say is that Akram became a complete bowler in 1989. During his best years he didn't played any Tests in India. The two series he did played in India were in 1987 and 1999, one at the beginning and the other at the end of his career.

Btw, Donald at his peak did struggle in Pakistan. That 1997/98 series in Pakistan he was very ordinary. I think he managed only 5 or 6 wickets in 3 Tests.
 
IMMY69 said:
It's like comparing apples and oranges.

One was a superb right handed bowler and the other a left armer.
One also played on dust bowls and the other had gun fielders behind and in front of the stumps.

Let's just say both were brilliant
Click to expand...
Can't agree more!
 
If you want to compare one bowler with Akram during that same era then it has to be Curtly Ambrose.
 
wasim akram is way ahead than donlad in every aspect so no comparison at all.. Waqar Younis would be a better comparison to Donald due to their similar pace.
 
Both Wasim & Donald were some of the greatest fast bowlers in their generation, along with McGrath, Ambrose, Walsh, Waqar, and Pollock. Even though all 7 of these bowlers have world-class stats and picked up plenty of wickets, the truth is that their own fraternity is likely to choose Ambrose, McGrath and Wasim as being a bit more special than the other 4. The likely reason is that the 3 of them transcend stats with some of the most memorable performances for their teams in their era along with big-match presence, and superstar persona. These are some of the things that transcend traditional stats. How many ex-cricketers who actually played with or against these bowlers have chosen Waqar over Wasim, or Pollock/Donald over McGrath, or Walsh over Ambrose on bowling ability alone?

On the original topic, if the assumption is that this test could potentially be played in any of the 7 (or 8 including SL) major test-playing nations, and their own team would have a team of similar batting, bowling, and fielding ability, I would pick Wasim Akram, as he was lethal with the old ball which is important in the subcontinent (though Donald was quite good because of raw pace), and he's still very capable with the new ball as well. I'd only pick Donald if the match was in SA or against England - a lot of Aussie and South African cricketers used England as a punching bag in that generation and got loads of wickets and runs against them. English batsmen for whatever reason did better against subcontinent teams.
 
To be fair though, in my opinion at least, Donald and Steyn are two bowlers that could've easily been considered the best fast bowlers of their generation if only they could have helped their very-good teams win something at multi-national tournaments (which is not test cricket, but the cricketers of their generation were never judged on test performances alone). And in test cricket unfortunately for South Africa, they were always going to be second to at least Australia throughout Donald's era. Even today I remember Donald more for his runout mixup at the '99 semifinal over any other performance!
 
That is not fair. Comparing 2 great bowlers of their time. Cannot pick 1 really. Both of them have been phenomenal.
 
Romali_rotti said:
Who has the better avg in Australia and overall vs Aus.
Click to expand...
And therein lies the difference. I've never seen Indian posters on PP disrespect Wasim Akram like classless Pakistani posters do to Sachin Tendulkar. They believe they achieve something by disrespecting Sachin Tendulkar, when in fact they merely show their own level the process.​
 
Cricket Warrior said:
wasim akram is way ahead than donlad in every aspect so no comparison at all.. Waqar Younis would be a better comparison to Donald due to their similar pace.
Click to expand...
Which aspect, exactly? Kindly name them. Average, strike rate, etc which one?
 
Hitman said:
And therein lies the difference. I've never seen Indian posters on PP disrespect Wasim Akram like classless Pakistani posters do to Sachin Tendulkar. They believe they achieve something by disrespecting Sachin Tendulkar, when in fact they merely show their own level the process.​
Click to expand...
That's because Indian fans admire Wasim, they know he is a magician and there is no obsession or jealousy involved. Where as when it comes to SRT,a lot of Pakistanis are so gutted he is Indian to a point it is affecting their lives with jealousy taking their mental peace😂
 
Why are Indians always on a cope mission about Pakistani bowlers of the 90s.

Whatever happens, no one talks about Donald, Ambrose, McGrath.

Waqar and Wasim are always mentioned when reverse swing comes up, Shoaib is always mentioned when extreme pace comes up, Imran is always mentioned about great allrounders.

You can split hairs about “oh at this time on this pitch, in this situation, stat XYZ, makes ABC looks worse” 🤓

you can keep McGrath, Donald, Ambrose etc. I would never swap any of our bowlers of that time to anyone else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the above is frankly a ridiculous comment to make considering McGrath and Ambrose are always brought up in the most important discussion of them all, the Greatest bowler of all time.

Regardless, think Wasim was the better of the two, absolutely insane between 1990 and 1997.
 
atreus said:
the above is frankly a ridiculous comment to make considering McGrath and Ambrose are always brought up in the most important discussion of them all, the Greatest bowler of all time.

Regardless, think Wasim was the better of the two, absolutely insane between 1990 and 1997.
Click to expand...
Wasim better bowler than McGrath? Do give us your thoughts on why.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MenInG
How does the present-day Jasprit Bumrah compare with the likes of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis?
19 20 21
Replies
2K
Views
44K
kron
K
T
Imran Khan vs Curtly Ambrose vs Dale Steyn vs Wasim Akram – Who is the better Test bowler?
Replies
20
Views
1K
Fanboy375
Fanboy375
T
Mitchell Starc versus Wasim Akram in ODIs/LOIs: Who is better?
Replies
30
Views
1K
Ab Fan
Ab Fan
R
Could Jasprit Bumrah make it into Pakistan's all-time XI, assuming he were a Pakistani cricketer?
Replies
23
Views
947
kron
K
T
James Anderson versus Andy Roberts: Who is the better Test bowler?
Replies
71
Views
2K
sindhiboy
S
Back
Top