What's new

Are we ever going to see a total of 500 in an ODI match?

Strike Rate

Senior T20I Player
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Runs
19,788
We have seen Lanka scoring 260 and Australia/South Africa scoring 248/241 in T20 which means a Run Rate of 12-13

We have also seen Lanka scoring 443 and Australia/South Africa coring 434/438 in ODI which means a Run Rate of around 9

So are we ready to see a total of 500 runs in in 50 overs with a run rate of 10? IMO we are not far away to witness it in this flat pitches and short boundary era where every thing goes in batsman favor from big bats to powerplays and shot boundaries .

If it happens i am sure it's going to happen in NZ or India
 
When India tours NZ and tees off from ball one, Rohit, Dhawan, Kohli, Dhoni and Raina can do it.
 
Did any one of you watch the innings from Rohit where he hit 264?

The Indian RR was 3 at one point and Rohit himself was 13 of 26 balls or something at one point.

So entirely doable.
 
The 1st 500 in ODIs, will happen either in New Zealand or India. Don't see 500 happening anywhere else
 
500 has happened in county cricket once, Somerset hit 502/4 against Devon some years back
 
It will be India vs Canada/Netherland/Ireland/UAE/Papua New Guinea in Chinnaswamy stadium lol.
 
The 1st 500 in ODIs, will happen either in New Zealand or India. Don't see 500 happening anywhere else

Nobody expected the first 400 to happen in SA, ODI wickets are flat the world over, all it requires is a relatively small ground and a strong batting team or a mismatch between the teams.
 
231 in today T20 match in SA so going by current form and scores, flat pitches and shot boundaries i think we are going to see big runs in this WC
 
231 in today T20 match in SA so going by current form and scores, flat pitches and shot boundaries i think we are going to see big runs in this WC

Being able to sustain that run rate over 50 overs is much more difficult than doing it over 20 overs though.
 
If indian batsmen face indian bowlers in banglore it could happen 2-3 times per year.
 
ODI???
a double century in a county T20 game has already been scored.
Soon someone will score 300 and then 400 and then what not in T20.

So what's gonna happen is that viewers will start getting bored by T20.
And then T20 will be reduced to 15/15, to 10/10, to 5/5 to finally a super over will be the entire match. Just like speed dating.
 
467 runs in 39.2 overs today t20 match wi vs sa. 232 successfully chased 4 batsmen together scored 310+ runs
 
Places like Wanderers have history of being high scoring grounds but the quality of bowling is hopeless.
 
500 will happen shortly. Only thing the ABD like knock has to come from an opener like Rohit or Warner.
 
SA can't do it unless Amla gets out early.

Aus have Warner, Finch and Watto - The most explosive top 3 currently. If they get a launching pad against one of the minnows in World cup. They will go well past 500. Cuz Smith can smoke 'em too.
 
SA can't do it unless Amla gets out early.

Aus have Warner, Finch and Watto - The most explosive top 3 currently. If they get a launching pad against one of the minnows in World cup. They will go well past 500. Cuz Smith can smoke 'em too.

This ABD innings would never have happened if the openers didn't put out the platform that they did. If the 500 barrier is ever breached, another solid, huge opening stand will have a big part to play in it.

It will most likely be India who will do it considering the pitches that they play on and their explosiveness on such pitches.
 
This ABD innings would never have happened if the openers didn't put out the platform that they did. If the 500 barrier is ever breached, another solid, huge opening stand will have a big part to play in it.

It will most likely be India who will do it considering the pitches that they play on and their explosiveness on such pitches.

Oh you need platform alright but then say Amla was out by 35th over. Miller in, who knows SA could've got to 500 today itself.. Amla is a run-machine but even he has his limitations.
 
India, SA and Aus have the potential to do it.
 
Pakistan can do it if shehzad umar akmal and afridi fire together.
:))) Lol if Shehzad fires, he will get 120 off 125. 500 is not possible for Pakistan. UA won't last enough to get a daddy ton and Afridi is way too inconsistent.

350 max for Pakistan which is still enough for their bowling in case it has Irfan and Junaid, along with Hafeez.
 
:))) Lol if Shehzad fires, he will get 120 off 125. 500 is not possible for Pakistan. UA won't last enough to get a daddy ton and Afridi is way too inconsistent.

350 max for Pakistan which is still enough for their bowling in case it has Irfan and Junaid, along with Hafeez.

They got 364 against you recently :p
 
To OP, as you stated in the other thread,
70 overs were played at the strike rate of 9.57

I am thinking about 2000 runs within two in the first innings of a test match. Looks like it maybe on the cards.
 
We have seen Lanka scoring 260 and Australia/South Africa scoring 248/241 in T20 which means a Run Rate of 12-13

We have also seen Lanka scoring 443 and Australia/South Africa coring 434/438 in ODI which means a Run Rate of around 9

So are we ready to see a total of 500 runs in in 50 overs with a run rate of 10? IMO we are not far away to witness it in this flat pitches and short boundary era where every thing goes in batsman favor from big bats to powerplays and shot boundaries .

If it happens i am sure it's going to happen in NZ or India

Depends who's bowling
 
It's extremely difficult against non-minnows. 400+ has been done few times in past as well but 500 would mean 2-3 gun knocks. If there are inconsequential games and openers fire big time in teams like Ind , Aus , SA or WI then I can see 500 possible but still it's very difficult.
 
There was IND v SL ODI in 2009 where India made 300 off 33 overs before Sehwag got out for 146. Dhoni promoted himself to no.3 and had some fun too. A collapose meant that India ended up with "only" 414 when we were looking all set for 450-475+
 
The 1st 500 in ODIs, will happen either in New Zealand or India. Don't see 500 happening anywhere else

I should add Johannesburg too

India v Australia ODI with weakened bowling attacks. And forget 500, we might see ODI 600 too :D
 
Ten years earlier, people used to question whether any team would be able to break Sri Lanka's 398 or Saeed Anwar's 194. Today we have 12 400+ scores and 3 double hundreds.

A 500 in ODIs is just round the corner, probably 2/3 years maybe and although an individual triple hundred is next to impossible, I also do feel it will eventually happen on day.

Once the 500 barrier is broken, you'll see quite a few teams in that club.

The million dollar question is:

When will Pakistan get to 400?
 
Ten years earlier, people used to question whether any team would be able to break Sri Lanka's 398 or Saeed Anwar's 194. Today we have 12 400+ scores and 3 double hundreds.

A 500 in ODIs is just round the corner, probably 2/3 years maybe and although an individual triple hundred is next to impossible, I also do feel it will eventually happen on day.

Once the 500 barrier is broken, you'll see quite a few teams in that club.

The million dollar question is:

When will Pakistan get to 400?

I get a feeling that we will make a big score against UAE and/or Zimbabwe if we bat first against them in the WC.
 
Only way Pakistan will score 500 runs in a match is to play 100 overs against Bermuda/png , even then there is a big question mark if their batsmen could last that long
 
Cricket is becoming pure nonsense.

This.

Thing is we're in the minority sadly. Average cricket fan loves 50m sixes and 400 plus scores, which is why sooner or later every country will be flat as hell.

I dont mind or care if domestic t20 leagues are like this, but the problem is the administrators are now trying to attract the t20 fanatic to ODI's and tests and as a result tests are on flat wickets and ODI's are going through a serious identity crisis. They should be a mix between tests and t20 but they're now turning into longer versions of t20, hell they'll probably be called t50 soon.

Honestly I have absolutely no interest in bilaterals played on dead wickets but the average Joe does. I havent watched a cricket match in months tbh, and its sad that I have to say that
 
This.

Thing is we're in the minority sadly. Average cricket fan loves 50m sixes and 400 plus scores, which is why sooner or later every country will be flat as hell.

I dont mind or care if domestic t20 leagues are like this, but the problem is the administrators are now trying to attract the t20 fanatic to ODI's and tests and as a result tests are on flat wickets and ODI's are going through a serious identity crisis. They should be a mix between tests and t20 but they're now turning into longer versions of t20, hell they'll probably be called t50 soon.

Honestly I have absolutely no interest in bilaterals played on dead wickets but the average Joe does. I havent watched a cricket match in months tbh, and its sad that I have to say that

You know what?

All stats these days are turning into a nonsense.

For example Kohli has 5 centuries in Aus in 1 tour. SRT had 5 in 6 tours. Gavaskar had 5 overall.

Kohli is good but cmon...this is crazy. That guy couldn't put bat on ball in England.

So if we keep things at this rate Kohli the test bat >>>>> Gavaskar, SRT, Dravid

For now, the memory of the kind of garbage pitches in Aus are fresh so we don't hear absurd claims like that.

A few years down the line, people will forget all about that. Every batsman is going to make crazy runs, going to get hyped like hell (better than Viv, Sobers, Lara, SRT, etc, etc) and then one day people will start wondering....."wait a min....are you sure we are judging it right? These pitches are so garbage that its fight between who is a bigger FTB"

Of course, its NOT the players fault they get these garbage pitches but fact is all the modern day (last year or 2) stats are alarmingly favoring batsmen (I created a thread posting the stats).

Cricket is turning into a big old nonsense.
 
It's not just ODI's, Tests are becoming very batter friendly as well.. I've become rather disinterested in cricket of late... None of the series interest me because it's all pretty much one way traffic. Bring the bowlers back into the contest and make the batsmen earn their runs again. None of this Kohli/Bradman style FTBing :kohli
 
You know what?

All stats these days are turning into a nonsense.

For example Kohli has 5 centuries in Aus in 1 tour. SRT had 5 in 6 tours. Gavaskar had 5 overall.

Kohli is good but cmon...this is crazy. That guy couldn't put bat on ball in England.

So if we keep things at this rate Kohli the test bat >>>>> Gavaskar, SRT, Dravid

For now, the memory of the kind of garbage pitches in Aus are fresh so we don't hear absurd claims like that.

A few years down the line, people will forget all about that. Every batsman is going to make crazy runs, going to get hyped like hell (better than Viv, Sobers, Lara, SRT, etc, etc) and then one day people will start wondering....."wait a min....are you sure we are judging it right? These pitches are so garbage that its fight between who is a bigger FTB"

Of course, its NOT the players fault they get these garbage pitches but fact is all the modern day (last year or 2) stats are alarmingly favoring batsmen (I created a thread posting the stats).

Cricket is turning into a big old nonsense.

Inspite of this we are not getting batsmen who average 70-80. So there is a balance some where. There have been more batsmen averaging 50+ but inspite of all our complaints, the upper limit is not getting breached. We still don't have a single modern batsman averaging 60.

Cricket has always had this rule of the thumb. Great batsmen average 50-60, very good batsmen between 45-50, and good batsmen between 40-45 over their entire career. Whatever the era, these rules have not been altered much. The only difference we see in the modern age is a number of good batsmen averaging like very good batsmen, and some very good batsmen averaging like great batsmen. But no one has been able to break the 60 barrier inspite of all this talk. The game is still balanced.
 
Inspite of this we are not getting batsmen who average 70-80. So there is a balance some where. There have been more batsmen averaging 50+ but inspite of all our complaints, the upper limit is not getting breached. We still don't have a single modern batsman averaging 60.

Cricket has always had this rule of the thumb. Great batsmen average 50-60, very good batsmen between 45-50, and good batsmen between 40-45 over their entire career. Whatever the era, these rules have not been altered much. The only difference we see in the modern age is a number of good batsmen averaging like very good batsmen, and some very good batsmen averaging like great batsmen. But no one has been able to break the 60 barrier inspite of all this talk. The game is still balanced.

Because the trend has turned for the worse JUST NOW.

Unless something is done, you will start seeing those averages within the next 5-10 years.

Here are the overall batting averages of Top 8 sides against each other (no minnow bashing).

1960s - 30.81 (298 centuries)

1970s - 30.76 (359 centuries)

1980s - 30.45 (444 centuries)

1990s - 29.58 (495 centuries)

2000s - 32.60 (783 centuries)

2010s (till now) - 32.31 (385 centuries)

Last 3 years – 32.24 (240 centuries till now)

Last 2 years - 32.78 (166 centuries)

Last 1 year - 35.22 (97 centuries)

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...t-Faces-Batting-Averages-In-Different-Decades

The game is anything but balanced.
 
Maybe, but it would probably be in NZ where someone has to play a DeVilliers like innings.


That was a freak innings along with the 264. Something like that won't be happening anytime soon.

Maybe in T20's though, the first 300 being scored.
 
On the basis of one year you concluded this? Have you checked out individual years like 2004, 2005 etc?

On the basis of the fact that...

1. 300 is a par score in ODIs these days in most places
2. Drainage systems are very effective thereby making pitches outside Asia flatter
3. Green tracks these days are becoming flat pattas by Day 3
4. Drop in Aus pitches are here to stay
5. 2 new ball rule in ODIs which kills reverse swing, reduces the effect of spinners and makes it easier for batsman to score well in the death overs (hard ball)
6. 4 fielder restriction (biggest crime)

The last 2 can be changed (but won't be) but the rest are here to stay.

If you can't see the trend what can I say bro?

Its not a case of unnecessary panic. Things are well and truly alarming.
 
360 today in 42 overs it looks like 300 is par score in this era and soon 350 will be par score
 
I remember the days when 250 was a par score on most grounds. That was some competitive cricket.
 
This is getting ridiculous.

Everyone criticized the flat highways made for Aus-India series in India.

What about now? Some of the WC grounds have absolute runways and it's totally killing the game when sides regularly post 330+ totals!
 
300 looks like a possibility in T20s i think we will see it one day maybe after a year or 2. Teams are getting 80-90 runs in 6 overs so they can get there if they maintain the run rate.
 
This inning of Eng showed it was possible if their scoring rate hadn't dropped in last 5 overs.
 
481 is the final score. There was a chance to touch 500 mark if the scoring rate hadn't dropped in last few overs
 
Alex Hales says England were targeting 500 during their ODI-record 481 against Australia

Alex Hales says England had their sights on a score of 500 during their ODI-record total of 481-6 against Australia at Trent Bridge.

Hales smashed 147 from 92 balls with Bairstow hitting 139 from the same number of deliveries as England surged past the previous record of 444, that they had set against Pakistan in 2016, also at Nottingham.

Jason Roy made 82 while Eoin Morgan (67) hit England's fastest one-day fifty, getting there from just 21 balls, and overtook Ian Bell as the country's leading run-scorer in ODIs.

It was shortly after Morgan's arrival at the crease, with England on 335-3 in the 38th over, that the prospect of reaching 500 was discussed.

"There was a moment when Morgs came out but we didn't quite get there unfortunately," Hales said of targeting 500. "He was saying 'if ever there is a chance, now is it' but I just couldn't quite get going at the end with those wide slower balls… but what a day!"

Bairstow confirmed that similar conversations were being had in the dressing room: "When Morgs got going with Baz it was definitely something that the lads were thinking about!"

As it was England had to settle for merely smashing their own world record while Bairstow was able to celebrate scoring his fourth ODI hundred in six innings.

"It was amazing," he said. "This ground is a special ground for us, it always seems to bring something exciting and what a pitch! Really, really good fun out there.

"I've got no idea (what the secret to scoring hundreds is), to be honest with you. It's just a case of relaxing and watching the ball.

"Each opposition gives you different challenges, each bowler is going to give you different challenges - you look at Stanlake at 6ft8in compared to Richardson who is smaller, skiddier. It's a case of maintaining your consistency, doing your same things day after day and keeping enjoying it, that's exactly what I'm doing at the moment."

Meanwhile for Hales, it was a timely century as he battles to try and keep his place in the side when Ben Stokes returns from injury.

"I'd say a little bit of both [excitement and relief], probably more excitement," he added. "As Jonny says, what a ground! We've had some great memories here as a team: chasing 380 against New Zealand and setting the previous record, which was done here as well. Great memories and today is another special day.

"[My plan was] just to keep the momentum going, I've got enough experience playing here to know it's a good pitch and a fast-scoring ground. It was good to come in and get off to a decent start, build a partnership with Jonny and it gave us a real platform to do something special."

http://www.skysports.com/cricket/ne...during-their-odi-record-481-against-australia
 
English wickets have become too batting friendly for LOIs. Expected though as England have an explosive batting line up. The India A team also scored 458 against LEICS (even though lots of them were rookies). So we should expect a lot of high scores in 2019 WC next year.
 
ODI???
a double century in a county T20 game has already been scored.
Soon someone will score 300 and then 400 and then what not in T20.

So what's gonna happen is that viewers will start getting bored by T20.
And then T20 will be reduced to 15/15, to 10/10, to 5/5 to finally a super over will be the entire match. Just like speed dating.

stop making stats up, highest 20/20 score is 175 by c gayle
 
Back
Top