"Attack first should have been the option" : Rashid Latif

jeetu

PPCL Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 19, 2010
Runs
9,860
Post of the Week
4
http://tribune.com.pk/story/1237547/hagley-oval-new-zealand-run-circles-around-pakistan/

New Zealand made light work of Pakistan on the fourth day of their first Test to coast to a comfortable eight-wicket win and gain a 1-0 lead in the two-match series.

The Hagley Oval pitch had offered a lot of support for the fast-bowlers in the previous days but eased considerably on the fourth morning. However, Pakistan’s tailenders and batsman Asad Shafiq failed to make the most of the conditions, adding a mere 42 runs to their overnight score of 129-7.

Chasing just 105, New Zealand lost opener Tom Latham for nine but Pakistan’s hopes of making further inroads were quelled by captain Kane Willamson (61) and debutant opener Jeet Raval (36 not out).

Former Pakistan captain and wicketkeeper batsman Rashid Latif feels the visitors’ defensive mindset cost them after they had bounced back in the match to restrict New Zealand to a 67-run lead in the first innings.

“The team couldn’t prepare due to the rained-off practice match at Nelson and, since the Hagley Oval pitch was so green, the batsmen can be excused for the first-innings collapse,” he said. “However, they squandered a great opportunity to recover in the second innings by meaninglessly occupying the crease rather than looking for runs.”

Latif feels the batsmen should have been looking to take the attack to the bowlers. “Attack first should have been the option rather than the plan given by [coach Mickey] Arthur,” said Latif. “New Zealand’s tail-enders and Sohail Khan were successful in doing so. Hopefully Pakistan will be better prepared for the second Test.”

Pakistan were further jolted in the dying moments of the game when Misbah left the field after learning about the illness of his father-in-law, who passed away a short while later. The senior batsman and Pakistan’s most experienced Test captain flew back to Lahore with his wife and has been ruled out of the second Test.

The PCB announced that vice-captain Azhar Ali will lead the team in the second Test, while no replacement for Misbah is flying out since uncapped opener Sharjeel Khan and batsman Mohammad Rizwan are already in the squad.

The pitch for the second Test is also expected to assist pacers and Latif believes Pakistan need to play four fast-bowlers.

“Pakistan need to play four pacers if Hamilton’s conditions and pitch are similar to Christchurch — Imran Khan or Wahab Riaz can be included in place of Yasir Shah, while Mohammad Nawaz can replace Misbah and provide a holding option as the spinner for the four-pronged pace attack.”

Latif added that Sharjeel can also be brought in, with Azam dropping into the number six spot. “The second option in my mind is Sharjeel coming in as an opener with Sami Aslam,” said the Karachi-born. “Azhar can then drop down to number three while Azam can bat at six with Asad replacing Misbah at number five.”
 
There's a difference between tailenders and the top order.

Kiwis were going through the motions when Sohail Khan started hitting them around the park. How can anyone think they would have bowled like that to the top order?

It's a silly comparison.

I do agree, you need to rotate strike and playing somewhat "attacking", but Sohail Khan is not the example to give because it's an entirely different part of the game.
 
As is always the case, ex-players suddenly become much more attacking and adventurous once they retire and a mic is placed in front of them. To hear them talk about cricket you'd think they used to declare and set the opposition 200 to win with two days left in the test.
 
As is always the case, ex-players suddenly become much more attacking and adventurous once they retire and a mic is placed in front of them. To hear them talk about cricket you'd think they used to declare and set the opposition 200 to win with two days left in the test.

:)) Basically this.

I have no idea what these ex-cricketers wanted the team to do. Smash 200 in 50 overs on that green pitch? Where even NZ bowled out for ~180?
 
Attack,attack,attack. That is all our ex players think is the answer to a defeat.
 
To the posters above, scoring 30 runs in 170 balls surely worked out well for us didn't it?
 
Had they attacked and got out, they would have been accused of lacking commitment. The reality is that whatever you do, it will be criticised if it doesn't come off.
 
Controlled attack is the way to go. You don't go out with a mind set of hitting like mad either. Our problem is we play to avoid losing wickets more then scoring runs. We were further handicapped by not playing any practise matches on pitches where our batsmen will already struggle on. A batsman should be thinking of scoring at least 50 runs every session that is not asking or much. Mohsin Khan makes some good point in regards to how we bat.
 
To the posters above, scoring 30 runs in 170 balls surely worked out well for us didn't it?


That isn't the answer but Latif is acting as though swing our bats around like hacks is the answer.

Look what happened to Younis and Misbah when they tried to be attacking.
 
That isn't the answer but Latif is acting as though swing our bats around like hacks is the answer.

Look what happened to Younis and Misbah when they tried to be attacking.


I wonder why Younis and Misbah were trying to be attacking... hmmmmmm can't think of ANY reason.
 
Pakistan in 1st inns tried to play to many over aggressive/expansive and uncalled for shots and we flopped with the bat. Controlled aggresion was needed with the bat but more so we need to put decent totals on the board with the bat which we failed to do so in both inns of the match.
 
I wonder why Younis and Misbah were trying to be attacking... hmmmmmm can't think of ANY reason.

Lol cuz of Azhar slow innings. It's not about not hitting boundaries, not even rotating the strike is a crime.
 
Back
Top