Princejain191
Tape Ball Regular
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2016
- Runs
- 422
Two of the most competitive test series in the last 2 years have been:
Australia and Pakistan weren't really expected to compete well, but they did. This brings me to my main topic, how important is starting early preparations?
Both Australia and Pakistan had one thing in common, they started to prepare for the tour more than a month before the first test. Australia set camps in UAE and prepared on slow and turning tracks. Similarly, Pakistan - not being a part of UAE - set camps in Pakistan first and then, had two full tour matches in England and about 15 days prep time there (they even had a tour match between the test matches).
To strengthen my hypothesis - without the same prep, Australia seemed mediocre against a side that is relatively inferior (Bangla) to India.
Similarly, Pakistan without the same camps and tour matches didn't fare well against Aus and NZ.
Of course, the resources to take wickets and to score runs are crucial to win, but I wonder how much of its translation into performance depends on prep time.
For this reason, though I think India currently has as good a team for away matches as it has had in the last 8 years (given its fast bowling and all-rounder options), I am not sure it can win away when it arrives in a country like SA just 7 days before the first test and that too after a soft series against SL.
- Australia vs. India - 2017
- Pakistan vs. England - 2016
Australia and Pakistan weren't really expected to compete well, but they did. This brings me to my main topic, how important is starting early preparations?
Both Australia and Pakistan had one thing in common, they started to prepare for the tour more than a month before the first test. Australia set camps in UAE and prepared on slow and turning tracks. Similarly, Pakistan - not being a part of UAE - set camps in Pakistan first and then, had two full tour matches in England and about 15 days prep time there (they even had a tour match between the test matches).
To strengthen my hypothesis - without the same prep, Australia seemed mediocre against a side that is relatively inferior (Bangla) to India.
Similarly, Pakistan without the same camps and tour matches didn't fare well against Aus and NZ.
Of course, the resources to take wickets and to score runs are crucial to win, but I wonder how much of its translation into performance depends on prep time.
For this reason, though I think India currently has as good a team for away matches as it has had in the last 8 years (given its fast bowling and all-rounder options), I am not sure it can win away when it arrives in a country like SA just 7 days before the first test and that too after a soft series against SL.