What's new

"Ball tampering when Wasim & I did it, later same people called it reverse-swing" : Waqar Younis

Saj

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 1, 2001
Runs
96,141
"Ball tampering when Wasim & I did it, later same people called it reverse-swing" : Waqar Younis

A legend of world cricket and the pride and joy of Pakistan fans, Waqar Younis was one of the most feared and destructive bowlers in history. Boasting 789 international wickets at phenomenal strike rates in both Tests and ODIs, he was a nightmare for all batsmen, who collectively breathed a sigh of relief when he retired from the game in April 2004.

Waqar continued to be heavily involved with Pakistan cricket, enjoying stints as bowling coach from March 2006 to January 2007, and again in 2009. In February 2010 he succeeded Intikhab Alam as Head Coach of the Pakistan team and his tenure produced mixed results, including a defeat in the semi-finals of the 2010 World T20 and 2011 World Cup, and Pakistan’s first Test win over Australia in 15 years. He resigned from the position in August 2011 but was re-appointed in May 2014 for a two-year period which ended with him stepping down in April 2016 following Pakistan’s disappointing Asia Cup and World Twenty20 campaigns.

One of the pioneers of reverse-swing, Waqar Younis has made valuable contributions to Pakistan cricket both during and after his playing career, and in an exclusive interview with PakPassion.Net, the 44-year-old spoke about his most recent stint as Head Coach, his recommendations for improving Pakistan cricket, and his memories of the controversy-filled England tour in 1992.



IMG_02842.JPG


PakPassion.net : Given the pressure of the job, you must be feeling ten years younger since leaving the position of Head Coach of the Pakistan cricket team?

Waqar Younis : Yes I do actually to be honest. I'm on holiday travelling around Europe with my children which is enjoyable and yes I'm feeling younger and relieved. It's the sort of job that is full of pressure, regardless of how well you do, or how badly you do. When you are away from such a job regardless of results you will feel relieved. I guess it's nice to be on the other side of things and not having that constant pressure around you.


PakPassion.net : What was the most frustrating aspect of being Pakistan's Head Coach?

Waqar Younis : The most frustrating aspect of the role was that the people in the Pakistan Cricket Board running Pakistan cricket and the people who are working on the field are not on the same page and that's what I feel is the biggest problem. It doesn't matter whether the coach is Javed Miandad, Waqar Younis or anyone else, he is going to have problems if everyone is not on the same page and everyone isn't heading in the same direction. When that happens, then it becomes very frustrating for the coach. Everybody wants to win but when you are working at the international level you have to develop players and give them opportunities and wait for the good times to come. But in Pakistan cricket and not just at Board level there is a lot of frustration and they want to win everything quickly and that doesn't work when you lose your top players. It takes time for younger players to come through and this is what happened in the fifty-over format where we tried to bring through younger players and people started to get frustrated with the results. We need to develop a position within the Board where that individual brings everyone together, or the Board needs to give more powers to the Head Coach.


PakPassion.net : Do you think one of the problems within Pakistan cricket is that the Chairman is not a former cricketer himself?

Waqar Younis : It has been a problem for a number of years, it's definitely an issue. The people running Pakistan cricket should be former cricketers. If not the Chairman, then the key decision-makers advising the Chairman should be former cricketers. I've stated this fact in my recommendation reports to the Pakistan Cricket Board. You need a cricket committee who make the cricketing decisions. What's happening is that all of the decisions are coming from the Board of Governors and there are no cricketers amongst them. The wrong people are making the important cricket decisions. We need to give responsibility to those who have played cricket for Pakistan at the top level, such as Wasim Akram, Younis Khan, Misbah-ul-Haq and Ramiz Raja, all of who know and understand how cricket is changing and what is required in domestic cricket. It's great that Mudassar Nazar is back working for the PCB and I had been suggesting that Mudassar should be brought back for a long time. Wasim Akram needs to be utilised more by the Board for suggestions and ideas and to help Pakistan cricket move forward.


PakPassion.net : In your position as Head Coach, you've seen how Pakistan cricket is being run. Given what you have witnessed, how do you see Pakistan cricket's future in the coming years?

Waqar Younis : If international cricket does not come back to Pakistan in the next ten years we are done and our cricket will be finished. We have to make sure our domestic structure is improved and is of a better standard. Look at the example of South Africa who were out of international cricket for many years but I remember going to South Africa for the first time in 1994 and when playing against them I felt like this nation had never been away from international cricket. This was due to their strong domestic cricket structure that produced excellent cricketers.

Our stadiums are rundown and empty; nobody is watching domestic cricket apart from the major twenty-over tournaments. Our cricket committee needs to have eight to ten people who were top quality cricketers who have played around the world and at the highest level as their ideas can be beneficial to the Pakistan Cricket Board and Pakistan cricket's future. I gave the PCB the names of people who should be on the cricket committee, but sadly none of those people are there. Instead they have brought in Iqbal Qasim and Nadeem Khan who played cricket so long ago and are not really in touch with modern day cricket. I have nothing against these people but we need to move forward.


PakPassion.net : You must be smiling to yourself as each one of your suggestions gets implemented by the PCB after you have left the post of Head Coach?

Waqar Younis : I just wish they had made these changes in response to my first set of recommendations and then things would have been a lot better for me and the Board and the team. However, I'm glad things are moving in the right direction because that is the direction that other international cricket teams have been heading. I could have given them more ideas and suggestions, but I guess that wasn’t to be and this is where we are currently at. The most important recommendation I made to the Board was the running and the revival of the academies around Pakistan, which had been half-built and then left without any care or attention. I needed those academies to be functional and for those academies to have international coaches coming and working there. Look at Bangladesh and why they have improved, their academies and cricketers at Under 19 level have been coached by international coaches from Australia, England and other parts of the world. We need that change, we need to see international coaches who have no baggage coming to Pakistan and working at the academies around the country with our players. This will make a huge difference and will have the right impact.


PakPassion.net : Do you think your tenure as Head Coach would have been a lot smoother had Inzamam-ul-Haq been Chief Selector?

Waqar Younis : We would have done a lot better as a team because Inzamam understands me, we played a lot of cricket together, we have that understanding and relationship and Inzamam doesn't bring any baggage with him to the role. I had suggested in my first recommendations report to the PCB that Inzamam should be the Chief Selector and you will see the positive difference. Unfortunately, it didn't happen and that was detrimental to Pakistan cricket.


PakPassion.net : Umar Akmal and Ahmed Shehzad find themselves at a crucial point in their cricketing careers. What advice do you offer them?

Waqar Younis : I sat with them many times and told them what I wanted from them. I sat with them ahead of the 2015 World Cup and told them what I and the team expected and needed, and what the nation wanted from them. I worked hard on them but unfortunately the passion is not there. The cricketing passion is missing from them. They need to realise that cricket isn't just about making money, cricket is not a business and it's about passion. Sometimes I got the impression that these youngsters don't offer enough. They are thinking about too many other things and not about cricket. Look at the era when I played cricket, with the likes of Inzamam-ul-Haq and Wasim Akram, these guys thought about nothing other than cricket. This is an area where I feel these youngsters are lacking. Umar and Ahmed need to pull their socks up if they want to get back into the team. Talent will only take you to a certain level, after that it's hard work that will carry you forward. We have seen enough of their talent and if they are not prepared to work hard then we may not see them again in the Pakistan team.


PakPassion.net : Have you any advice for Mickey Arthur?

Waqar Younis : Be patient and be honest. I think that will be the key for him. I've heard he's a disciplinarian and I think that will work for him. He's an experienced coach and he's coached around the world and that will be beneficial. I think the Pakistan team will blossom under Mickey Arthur. Things are moving forward, Mudassar Nazar is there now and he will do a good job with the academies and we have to be patient. Everyone has to give Mickey some time and not expect too much, too soon.


PakPassion.net : You have been quoted as saying you have unfinished business as Pakistan Head Coach...?

Waqar Younis : I've been misquoted by some reporters regarding this unfinished business quote. I don't have unfinished business, this is ridiculous. All this, 'I will be back' stuff and 'have regrets', that's all untrue. I enjoyed my time as Head Coach and I feel that some cricketers improved under my supervision. Younger players were given an opportunity and now those players are coming though. The likes of Azhar Ali, Asad Shafiq and Sarfraz Ahmed have become established players now for Pakistan. In addition, Mohammad Rizwan, Wahab Riaz and now with Mohammad Amir, Pakistan has the makings of a good side. I feel I made progress and the team made progress but unfortunately because we lost some limited overs series as we were a young team, there was a lot of negativity and things did not quite turn out the way that everyone wanted them to.


PakPassion.net : There appears to be a lot of pressure on Mohammad Amir. Do you think he can cope with the expectations and in your opinion, just how good is he?

Waqar Younis : He's a seriously wonderful talent. The only thing that worries me is that we are putting him under a lot of pressure. We should allow him to go out there and just play cricket and enjoy his cricket. Expectations are going to be high as he's due to play some big series. Everyone's eyes will be on him at Lord's and instead of labelling him as a superstar and saying he will do this and that, we should sit back and allow him to get back into the Test match groove without too much pressure. He has the talent, he's a gifted cricketer, who is enthusiastic and energetic, but let him perform and let him get back into it. I think once he's back playing Test cricket and in rhythm he will trouble batsmen all around the world.


PakPassion.net : What are your memories of the 1992 controversy-filled Test series in England?

Waqar Younis : It was an amazing series and it's a series that will stay with me forever. In fact, 1992 as a year will always be special to everyone involved in Pakistan cricket and will be dear to our hearts forever. The World Cup win and then the successful Test series in England, beating New Zealand away from home; it was a great year.

When you are touring England, it doesn't matter where you are from, you just have to be careful with the controversies. There are hawks out there looking at you and that's what happened in 1992 with the ball-tampering allegations. But overall the memories of that series are great and I cherish those memories.


PakPassion.net : Ball-tampering one day, then labelled reverse-swing later. That must still frustrate you?

Waqar Younis : It was being called ball-tampering back then when Wasim and I did it, later the same people were calling it reverse-swing. I laugh at that now because I am glad that the art of reverse-swing was eventually recognised. People look up to the art and whenever people talk about reverse-swing they mention Wasim Akram and myself and the other names who bowled reverse-swing later are mentioned afterwards. It gives me immense happiness that we were the pioneers of reverse-swing and it's a skill that is now widely recognised and helps young fast bowlers.


PakPassion.net : Do you think the 1992 Test series in England was pivotal for the art of reverse-swing?

Waqar Younis : The 1992 Test series in England was a revolution when it comes to reverse-swing and fast bowling. The Pakistan team had three or four fast bowlers who were very good at reverse-swinging the ball around at that time and that skill has continued to this day when it comes to Pakistan's pace bowling attack. The 1992 series in England paved the way for future generations of bowlers perfecting the art of reverse-swing not only in Pakistan but later around the world. I feel proud that Pakistani pace bowlers are credited with the art of reverse-swing and that skill has continued through the generations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Must be painful to see everyone talking about reverse-swing like it was invented by them!
 
Must be painful to see everyone talking about reverse-swing like it was invented by them!

white privilege. But ultimatley the truth is simply the truth. And the fact is nobody can still do it like wiqi and waz used to. all the new age pretenders think they can do it like they did but the truth is I havent seen anyone like waqar in his prime!!

coming onto the patience part of his interview. He is right and this applies to the fans too who also idiotic and impatient too...just look at this forum at times? it goes from wrist slitting to euphoria in an over!!
 
Enjoyed reading this, a shame Waqar as a coach didn't work out. He had some faults but pcb not listening to a legend of Pakistan cricket is really disappointing and fustrating to hear.
 
Actually an insightful interview, enjoyed that. Whilst I had my criticisms of Waqar and his tactical nous as a coach, I don't doubt his sincerity and commitment to the job.
 
An insightful interview... he has the basics right. Don't agree on everything but I really respect his views on Pakistan cricket and how we can improve in the future. Interesting to see some of his changes being implemented now with the PCB getting the plaudits for it. Better late than never...
 
Last edited:
Good Interview. But i actually judge people by actions and what they do. Anyone can give a good talk. Waqar had many chances to coach Pakistan and failed every time. Don't be fooled by outburst against the PCB, i am patriotic, i am sacrificing so much to coach Pakistan, the guy was just saving face when the end was nigh.
 
Good Interview. But i actually judge people by actions and what they do. Anyone can give a good talk. Waqar had many chances to coach Pakistan and failed every time. Don't be fooled by outburst against the PCB, i am patriotic, i am sacrificing so much to coach Pakistan, the guy was just saving face when the end was nigh.

Facts state otherwise

He was a great coach.
 
No he wasn't a great coach. The teams odi and t20 fortunes tell a different story.

Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk

Performances didn't go down significantly in any aspect.

They improved significantly in Tests ( We hadn't won a test series in 2+ years before he came.)

In ODIs we were in disarray and had a terrible CT2013 where we lost every game. So by that standard we improved. Ofcourse no where near acceptable but Waqar's hands were tied and he had to make do with players he didn't want and influences which weren't the best

T20s you can say he had no impact on. Afridi was basically running the show himself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No he wasn't a great coach. The teams odi and t20 fortunes tell a different story.

Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk
To be honest our LOI teams will continue to suffer, no matter who is coach. The mind-set is just not there in these players. Couple that with poor techniques and poor habits, there is a reason we are languishing at the bottom. Waqar obviously has had personality issues, right from his playing days. You expect that from a player of his stature. But he cannot really be blamed for the performance of a LOI team that had no option but to go for Azhar Ali as ODI captain when Misbah retired. Thats how bad it is and will continue to be.

Mudassar Nazar is the last hope of Pakistan producing decent LOI cricketers. The culture has to be built where modern world batting tactics are given the utmost importance.

Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
 
excellent interview, well done pp.

once again the most prominent problem that i took away from the interview was the pcb. this seems to be an unfixable problem.
 
This set up needs to be persisted with for at least 5 years before we start seeing major results. I've said it before-Pakistan is a long term rebuild right now and people need to be patient.

I'm happy things are going in the right direction, but there are still a lot of bad people in powerful PCB positions.

I do think that you will see Arthur do a very good job. Discipline is what this team needs, and while it will take some time for him to establish that culture, the right things are already being done to move Pakistan in that direction.
 
I think Waqar got a bit of a rough deal as coach from some.

He had some good ideas and suggestions but they all seemed to be accepted too late by PCB.

Sadly the PCB brought in some individuals like Haroon Rasheed in key roles who made Waqar's job even harder.
 
http://www.samaa.tv/sports/2016/07/pcb-should-utilize-wasim-akram-more-waqar-younis/

ISLAMABAD: Former head coach Waqar Younis has urged the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) to utilize Wasim Akram more as his suggestions and ideas can help Pakistan cricket to move forward.

Waqar said the key decision-makers advising the Chairman should be former cricketers. “I have stated this fact in my recommendation reports to the Pakistan Cricket Board.”

“You need a cricket committee who make the cricketing decisions. What’s happening is that all of the decisions are coming from the Board of Governors and there are no cricketers amongst them,” he told Pakpassion.net.

“We need to give responsibility to cricketers such as Wasim Akram, Younis Khan, Misbah-ul-Haq and Ramiz Raja. Wasim needs to be utilised more by the Board for suggestions and ideas and to help Pakistan cricket move forward,” he said.

Waqar said we have to make sure our domestic structure is improved and is of a better standard. “Look at the example of South Africa who was out of international cricket for many years but I remember going to South Africa for the first time in 1994 and when playing against them I felt like this nation had never been away from international cricket. This was due to their strong domestic cricket structure that produced excellent cricketers”.

He said our stadiums are empty, nobody is watching domestic cricket apart from the major twenty-over tournaments. “Our cricket committee needs to have eight to ten top quality cricketers as their ideas can be beneficial to the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) and Pakistan cricket’s future.”

“I gave PCB the names of people who should be on the cricket committee, but instead they have brought in Iqbal Qasim and Nadeem Khan who played cricket so long ago and are not really in touch with modern day cricket. I have nothing against these people but we need to move forward,” he said.

Speaking about the new head coach Mickey Arthur, Waqar advised Mickey to be patient and honest. “He is an experienced coach and he has coached around the world and that will be beneficial. I think the Pakistan team will blossom under Mickey.”

“Things are moving forward, Mudassar Nazar is there now and he will do a good job with the academies and we have to be patient.

Everyone has to give Mickey some time and not expect too much, too soon,” he said. –APP
 
Waqar bashes critics of his and Wasim’s reverse swing skill

Former Pakistan head coach Waqar Younis believes people who criticised him and Wasim Akram for ball-tampering later revealed their bigotry by calling the same art reverse swing.

Known as the ‘Sultans of Swing’, the duo were lethal during the 1992 tour to England and ended up being accused of ball-tampering. However, nothing was proved against them.

“It was being called ball-tampering back then when Wasim and I did it; later, the same people were calling it reverse swing,” said Waqar. “I laugh at them now because I am glad that the art of reverse swing was eventually recognised. People look up to the art and whenever people talk about reverse swing, they mention Wasim and myself and the other names who reverse swung the ball later are mentioned afterwards. It gives me immense happiness that we were the pioneers of reverse swing and it’s a skill that is now widely recognised.”

Pakistani pacers are considered to be the finest when handling reverse swing and the 44-year-old thinks the 1992 series in England was pivotal for the development of this art.

“The 1992 Test series in England was a revolution when it comes to fast bowling,” said Waqar. “The Pakistan team had three or four fast-bowlers who were very good at reverse swinging the ball and that skill has continued to this day when it comes to Pakistan’s pace bowling attack.

“The 1992 series in England paved the way for future generations of bowlers who perfecting the art of reverse swing not only in Pakistan but around the world as well. I feel proud that Pakistani pacers are credited with the art of reverse swing,” he added.

The 2010 sting operation against Mohammad Amir, Salman Butt and Muhammad Asif by an English publication which led to a ban on the trio is an example of how critical the English media can be and Waqar thinks the behaviour is not limited to cricketers of any specific country.

“When you are touring England, it doesn’t matter where you are from; you just have to be careful with the controversies,” he cautioned. “There are hawks out there looking at you and that’s what happened in 1992 with the ball-tampering allegations.”

‘PCB needs to utilise Wasim more’

The former right-arm pacer said the Pakistan Cricket Board should utilise Wasim Akram more in order to push the country’s cricket forward.

“It [a non-cricketer chairman] has been a problem for a number of years, it’s definitely an issue,” said Waqar. “The people running Pakistan cricket should be former cricketers. If not the chairman, then the key decision-makers advising the Chairman should be former cricketers. I’ve stated this fact in my recommendation reports to the Pakistan Cricket Board.”

“You need a cricket committee which makes cricketing decisions. What’s happening is that all of the decisions are coming from the Board of Governors and there are no cricketers amongst them. Wrong people are making important cricket decisions,” he added.

“We need to give responsibility to those who have played cricket for Pakistan at the top level, such as Wasim, Younus Khan, Misbahul Haq and Ramiz Raja. All of them know and understand how cricket is changing and what is required in domestic cricket. It’s great that Mudassar Nazar is back working for the PCB and I had been suggesting that for a long time. Wasim needs to be utilised more by the PCB for suggestions and ideas and to help Pakistan cricket move forward,” Waqar further said.

‘Too much pressure on Amir a worry’

Mohammad Amir recently displayed his class against Somerset in the three-day match where he took four wickets and Waqar thinks he can be a class act if he can focus on cricket.

“He [Amir] is a seriously wonderful talent,” said Waqar. “The only thing that worries me is that we are putting him under a lot of pressure. We should allow him to go out there and just play cricket and enjoy it.

“Expectations are going to be high as he’s due to play a big series. Everyone’s eyes will be on him at Lord’s and instead of labelling him as a superstar and saying he will do this and that, we should sit back and allow him to get back into the Test match groove without too much pressure,” he added.

“He has the talent. He’s a gifted cricketer who is enthusiastic and energetic but let him perform. I think once he’s back playing Test cricket and in rhythm he will trouble batsmen all around the world,” said a hopeful Waqar.

Waqar Younis was interviewed by PakPassion.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1137769/waqar-bashes-critics-wasims-reverse-swing-skill/
 
Younis to Arthur: Be patient and be honest

Cape Town - Former Pakistan coach, Waqar Younis, has given new coach Mickey Arthur some advice ahead of the South African's first tour at the helm for Pakistan.

Younis has served as Pakistan coach twice in the past, and also believes Pakistan Cricket would benefit from taking advice from former players.

The former quick was asked what advice he would give to Arthur in a recent interview with pakpassion.net, and said: "Be patient and be honest. I think that will be the key for him.

"I've heard he's a disciplinarian and I think that will work for him. He's an experienced coach and he's coached around the world and that will be beneficial.

"I think the Pakistan team will blossom under Mickey Arthur. Things are moving forward, Mudassar Nazar is there now and he will do a good job with the academies and we have to be patient.

"Everyone has to give Mickey some time and not expect too much, too soon.

When asked if ex-players would be better suited to board positions than bureaucrats, Younis responded: "It has been a problem for a number of years, it's definitely an issue.

"The people running Pakistan cricket should be former cricketers. If not the Chairman, then the key decision-makers advising the Chairman should be former cricketers.

"I've stated this fact in my recommendation reports to the Pakistan Cricket Board. You need a cricket committee who make the cricketing decisions.

"What's happening is that all of the decisions are coming from the Board of Governors and there are no cricketers amongst them.

"The wrong people are making the important cricket decisions.

"We need to give responsibility to those who have played cricket for Pakistan at the top level, such as Wasim Akram, Younis Khan, Misbah-ul-Haq and Ramiz Raja, all of who know and understand how cricket is changing and what is required in domestic cricket.

"It's great that Mudassar Nazar is back working for the PCB and I had been suggesting that Mudassar should be brought back for a long time. Wasim Akram needs to be utilised more by the Board for suggestions and ideas and to help Pakistan cricket move forward."

http://www.sport24.co.za/Cricket/younis-to-arthur-be-patient-and-be-honest-20160708
 
Pakistan has all the potential to beat England: Waqar Younis

ISLAMABAD: Former head coach Waqar Younis believes Pakistan team has all the potential to beat England at their home saying the green-shirts just have to play at their best.

Waqar said this tour is very important for Pakistan and our team has the capability to beat England. Speaking about England’s leading Test wicket-taker James Anderson out of the test due to injury, he said it does not matter who England plays or not, the only thing which matters in this series is that we have to play at our best.

“English team is very good at the moment as they thumped Sri Lanka in the series,” he said while talking to a private news channel.

He said our openers are struggling at the moment and we have to pay special attention to it. “Though Muhammad Hafeez is looking lost in the English conditions but still we should open with him,” he said.

He said Hafeez has struggled outside Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). “England and Australia series are very important for Hafeez’s career.”

“He should know that he is not a youngster anymore and if he doesn’t perform then he won’t get many chances,” he said. Waqar said if Hafeez doesn’t go well as an opener in this series then we should try Sami Aslam.”

He said Pakistan will be facing many challenges in this series when it comes to British media, the pitches and the conditions there. “Fingers will also be raised on Mohammad Amir but our focus should be on winning the series,” he said.

He said our cricketers got plentiful of time prior to the series to practice well. “Now if they (players) fail they cannot complain that they did not get enough time to prepare themselves for the series,” he said.

Waqar said Amir is a very good bowler and can do well in any pitch. “Wahab Riaz, Imran Khan, Sohail Khan and Rahat Ali are good bowlers and can do well in the series depends on the conditions of pitches they are played on,” he said.

It may be mentioned that Waqar faced great criticism after Pakistan was unable to make it to the semi-finals of the World Twenty20 2016. After winning against Bangladesh in the World T20, the team lost against New Zealand, India and Australia, leading to their outing.

On April 4, Waqar resigned as head coach of the team, just after Shahid Afridi resigned as T20 captain.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/134058-Pakistan-potential-beat-England-Waqar-Younis
 
One question I would have liked you to ask Waqar is why did he want Azhar Ali as the odi captain
 
I think Waqar got a bit of a rough deal as coach from some.

He had some good ideas and suggestions but they all seemed to be accepted too late by PCB.

Sadly the PCB brought in some individuals like Haroon Rasheed in key roles who made Waqar's job even harder.
Waqar was way too stubborn as a coach, someone who refused to accept his mistakes. His handling of Sarfaraz was shocking.
 
Must be painful to see everyone talking about reverse-swing like it was invented by them!
I doubt it the art would die soon.
white privilege. But ultimatley the truth is simply the truth. And the fact is nobody can still do it like wiqi and waz used to. all the new age pretenders think they can do it like they did but the truth is I havent seen anyone like waqar in his prime!!

coming onto the patience part of his interview. He is right and this applies to the fans too who also idiotic and impatient too...just look at this forum at times? it goes from wrist slitting to euphoria in an over!!


Sent from my SM-J710F using Tapatalk
 
I was priviliged to see wasim and waqar at their prime 92 & 96 series.
The greatest fast bowlers of all time.
Never seen they like before and never likely to see their like again.
 
What is sadder in my view is the fact that we really have no successors to their brilliance! Mohammad Amir could be that but nothing else on the horizon.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The best so far!!! &#55357;&#56834;&#55357;&#56834;&#55357;&#56834; <a href="https://t.co/qaiiVCmBbA">pic.twitter.com/qaiiVCmBbA</a></p>— Adam Hollioake (@adamhollioake) <a href="https://twitter.com/adamhollioake/status/978516178019631104?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
It's hard to reverse swing the ball that too when ball is only around 30 odd overs old and also all in sudden right after drinks break without tampering with the ball. It's just my opinion.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The best so far!!! &#55357;&#56834;&#55357;&#56834;&#55357;&#56834; <a href="https://t.co/qaiiVCmBbA">pic.twitter.com/qaiiVCmBbA</a></p>— Adam Hollioake (@adamhollioake) <a href="https://twitter.com/adamhollioake/status/978516178019631104?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Ok that is hilarious :))
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The best so far!!! ������ <a href="https://t.co/qaiiVCmBbA">pic.twitter.com/qaiiVCmBbA</a></p>— Adam Hollioake (@adamhollioake) <a href="https://twitter.com/adamhollioake/status/978516178019631104?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I wouldn't be surprised if they really are chortling away to themselves. :)))
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The best so far!!! ������ <a href="https://t.co/qaiiVCmBbA">pic.twitter.com/qaiiVCmBbA</a></p>— Adam Hollioake (@adamhollioake) <a href="https://twitter.com/adamhollioake/status/978516178019631104?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 27, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Begs the question: Amateur because they don't know how to reverse a fair ball, or amateur because they got caught modifying a ball?
 
Begs the question: Amateur because they don't know how to reverse a fair ball, or amateur because they got caught modifying a ball?

If you think of the incident itself, it's obvious what this is implying.
 
Don't say Waqar did not warn us about Ahmed Shehzad and Umar Akmal

PakPassion.net : Umar Akmal and Ahmed Shehzad find themselves at a crucial point in their cricketing careers. What advice do you offer them?

Waqar Younis : I sat with them many times and told them what I wanted from them. I sat with them ahead of the 2015 World Cup and told them what I and the team expected and needed, and what the nation wanted from them. I worked hard on them but unfortunately the passion is not there. The cricketing passion is missing from them. They need to realise that cricket isn't just about making money, cricket is not a business and it's about passion. Sometimes I got the impression that these youngsters don't offer enough. They are thinking about too many other things and not about cricket. Look at the era when I played cricket, with the likes of Inzamam-ul-Haq and Wasim Akram, these guys thought about nothing other than cricket. This is an area where I feel these youngsters are lacking. Umar and Ahmed need to pull their socks up if they want to get back into the team. Talent will only take you to a certain level, after that it's hard work that will carry you forward. We have seen enough of their talent and if they are not prepared to work hard then we may not see them again in the Pakistan team.
 
Don't say Waqar did not warn us about Ahmed Shehzad and Umar Akmal

PakPassion.net : Umar Akmal and Ahmed Shehzad find themselves at a crucial point in their cricketing careers. What advice do you offer them?

Waqar Younis : I sat with them many times and told them what I wanted from them. I sat with them ahead of the 2015 World Cup and told them what I and the team expected and needed, and what the nation wanted from them. I worked hard on them but unfortunately the passion is not there. The cricketing passion is missing from them. They need to realise that cricket isn't just about making money, cricket is not a business and it's about passion. Sometimes I got the impression that these youngsters don't offer enough. They are thinking about too many other things and not about cricket. Look at the era when I played cricket, with the likes of Inzamam-ul-Haq and Wasim Akram, these guys thought about nothing other than cricket. This is an area where I feel these youngsters are lacking. Umar and Ahmed need to pull their socks up if they want to get back into the team. Talent will only take you to a certain level, after that it's hard work that will carry you forward. We have seen enough of their talent and if they are not prepared to work hard then we may not see them again in the Pakistan team.

Waqar is being over dramatic. Inzamam certainly did not focus on his cricket as much as he should have while Wasim was the first one to switch off after the days play
 
Don't say Waqar did not warn us about Ahmed Shehzad and Umar Akmal

PakPassion.net : Umar Akmal and Ahmed Shehzad find themselves at a crucial point in their cricketing careers. What advice do you offer them?

Waqar Younis : I sat with them many times and told them what I wanted from them. I sat with them ahead of the 2015 World Cup and told them what I and the team expected and needed, and what the nation wanted from them. I worked hard on them but unfortunately the passion is not there. The cricketing passion is missing from them. They need to realise that cricket isn't just about making money, cricket is not a business and it's about passion. Sometimes I got the impression that these youngsters don't offer enough. They are thinking about too many other things and not about cricket. Look at the era when I played cricket, with the likes of Inzamam-ul-Haq and Wasim Akram, these guys thought about nothing other than cricket. This is an area where I feel these youngsters are lacking. Umar and Ahmed need to pull their socks up if they want to get back into the team. Talent will only take you to a certain level, after that it's hard work that will carry you forward. We have seen enough of their talent and if they are not prepared to work hard then we may not see them again in the Pakistan team.

Words of wisdom.

Sadly both Umar and Ahmed have failed to deliver. Above all, they have let themselves down throughout their career.
 
Waqar is being over dramatic. Inzamam certainly did not focus on his cricket as much as he should have while Wasim was the first one to switch off after the days play

Focus? elaborate, and please do not come up with "He could have achieved more than he had", we are talking about Inzi, not Umar Akmal.

What did you wish Wasim had done after the days play? clean up the pitch with a broom? All players do the same.
 
Focus? elaborate, and please do not come up with "He could have achieved more than he had", we are talking about Inzi, not Umar Akmal.

What did you wish Wasim had done after the days play? clean up the pitch with a broom? All players do the same.

Lol Everyone knows that Inzi was very lethargic towards his cricket, did not take the game that seriously and only achieved everything he had on pure natural talent. Even IK to this day states Inzi was an under achiever with respect to the talent he had.

And what I am trying to prove about Wasim is that he was not all Cricket and nothing else like Waqar is talking about.
 
Lol Everyone knows that Inzi was very lethargic towards his cricket, did not take the game that seriously and only achieved everything he had on pure natural talent. Even IK to this day states Inzi was an under achiever with respect to the talent he had.

And what I am trying to prove about Wasim is that he was not all Cricket and nothing else like Waqar is talking about.

Inzamam was lethargic with his fitness not his practice or preparation You don’t score 20k intl runs and the World Cup on talent alone

Inzamam was very serious about batting and anyone saying anything else is talking nonsense
 
Last edited:
Inzamam was lethargic with his fitness not his practice or preparation You don’t score 20k intl runs and the World Cup on talent alone

Inzamam was very serious about batting and anyone saying anything else is talking nonsense

Lol Inzamam can. That is the talent the man possessed. And lol Bob Woolmer would single handedly run practice drills where the rest of the team participated while Inzi would just sit around, lie down, eat bananas.

Inzi was not really ambitious about his cricket otherwise he would have achieved so much more.
 
Pakistan’s inability to “prepare” the old ball for reverse swing was disappointing

Yes , the Pakistani batsmen were terrible , yes Yasir is no Warne but really we missed the crucial factor in our victories over England , REVERSE SWING, which even the English bowlers exploited in the second innings.

Don't know who the designated ball shiner is in the team but if the bowlers had gotten it to reverse just a little England would not have gone past 200.

This is where the inexperience showed and Azhar's lack of leadership does not help matters .
 
Lack of spit use means it will take some time for us to learn to get consistent reverse in post covid days
 
According to Ian Pont England didnt even reverse swing once.

Also the Sky commentators kept repeating that reverse swing isn't common @ Old Trafford because of the wet conditions and moisture in the ground.

Reverse swing is more common @ London where the wickets are drier. There is a reason we have always done well in London.
 
To Reverse or not to Reverse

What once was an art limited to the Pakistani bowling attack seems to be used and exploited by all teams apart from Pakistan.

The moisture in the outfield in the first 2 tests certainly inhibited reverse swing however, 94 overs into the innings of the 3rd test and we have not seen any inkling of reverse swing.

Is it just me or does it frustrate you when you see everyone palming the dry side of ball with their sweaty hands. It’s no wonder they can’t reverse swing the ball!
 
Wind was blowing quite heavily yesterday. It obviouely hampered the ability to swing it in the reverse direction
 
Interesting how English comms talking about reverse swing as if they invented it; What is sadder is that we cant do that any more!
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/OnThisDay?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#OnThisDay</a> in 1994. The brilliant duo of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis bowled Sri Lanka out for 71 on day 1 of a Test match in Kandy <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a> <a href="https://t.co/JpARoyDs2H">pic.twitter.com/JpARoyDs2H</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1298713297999376384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 26, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
You judge Smith and Warner because your precious Sharjeel was caught fixing. He needs to live with his actions. Don't do the fixing, if you can't live with the consequences.

Love you ignored my comment about Wasim,Imran,and Waqar. They admitted to tampering for years not once like Smith and Australia. They didn't get banned for a year as well. So why don't you question that? Oh I forgot, your morality stance is for none Pakistan players only.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Love you ignored my comment about Wasim,Imran,and Waqar. They admitted to tampering for years not once like Smith and Australia. They didn't get banned for a year as well. So why don't you question that? Oh I forgot, your morality stance is for none Pakistan players only.

Can you provide a credible source for when Wasim, Waqar etc admitted to cheating through the art of knowingly tampering the ball?

Steven Smith wouldn’t admit it until he was caught. I know it is painful for you to accept others besides Pakistan to be corrupt in sport. All I did was ask if the hypocrite Ramiz Raja would also have the same view about Smith and Warner returning for Australia who we’re struggling without them?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can you provide a credible source for when Wasim, Waqar etc admitted to cheating through the art of knowingly tampering the ball?

Steven Smith wouldn’t admit it until he was caught. I know it is painful for you to accept others besides Pakistan to be corrupt in sport. All I did was ask if the hypocrite Ramiz Raja would also have the same view about Smith and Warner returning for Australia who we’re struggling without them?


Imram Khan admitted in biography he used a bottle top to tamper with the ball. Waqar Younis was the first player to be banned for a game for ball tampering according to a cricinfo article. So according to your logic they should be banned for a year? I'm certain as the morale police officer you will chose to bury your head in the sand as it involves Pakistan players.

Ramiz is spot on in the OP. Your problem is you can't grasp the difference between fixing and tampering.
 
Imram Khan admitted in biography he used a bottle top to tamper with the ball. Waqar Younis was the first player to be banned for a game for ball tampering according to a cricinfo article. So according to your logic they should be banned for a year? I'm certain as the morale police officer you will chose to bury your head in the sand as it involves Pakistan players.

Ramiz is spot on in the OP. Your problem is you can't grasp the difference between fixing and tampering.

Hopefully more people will come out in the future and admit that they have tampered. The problem is, the Australians will not admit to anything unless they are caught with their pants down...
 
It is not a bigger offense because of the difference in intention. When you tamper with the ball, you are helping your team win. You are doing it for your team.

However, when you are spot-fixing, you are cheating against your team - you are betraying your teammates, and you are effectively risking the result of the match by deliberately conceding a few extra runs or by deliberately playing a few dots.

It is not about the level of bearing on the result but rather, it is about the distinction between cheating the opposition and cheating your teammates.

Cheating your teammates will always be a bigger crime than cheating the opposition, regardless of the magnitude. It is not about the financial implications.

Imran, Waqar, Sarfaraz Nawaz were all ball-tamperers and it would be completely laughable to state that their crimes were worse than that of Amir, Asif, Butt, Sharjeel, Saleem Malik, Ijaz Ahmed etc.
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ball tampering has been going on for decades and it ain't a new phenomenon, majority of the fast bowlers who have played have tampered in some way of form be it bottle tops, sand paper, zinc cream, mints, it's a sensitive topic for most as even michael Athertons expression shows guilt every time the subject is mentioned.
 
It is not a bigger offense because of the difference in intention. When you tamper with the ball, you are helping your team win. You are doing it for your team.

However, when you are spot-fixing, you are cheating against your team - you are betraying your teammates, and you are effectively risking the result of the match by deliberately conceding a few extra runs or by deliberately playing a few dots.

It is not about the level of bearing on the result but rather, it is about the distinction between cheating the opposition and cheating your teammates.

Cheating your teammates will always be a bigger crime than cheating the opposition, regardless of the magnitude. It is not about the financial implications.

Imran, Waqar, Sarfaraz Nawaz were all ball-tamperers and it would be completely laughable to state that their crimes were worse than that of Amir, Asif, Butt, Sharjeel, Saleem Malik, Ijaz Ahmed etc.
.

"Imran, Waqar, Sarfaraz Nawaz were all ball-tamperers" Wrong, this was a slur given to them because they were reverse swinging the Ball.
Because Reverse swing was a closely guarded secret of Pakistan until Wasim and Waqar gave it away first to their own Counties in England and then to Indian Pacers By Wasim Akram. Now it is something that everyone knows. In early 90s English papers were calling Reverse Swing as cheating now it is called an Art. There was an article in English paper were they demanded Pakistan to reveal how Reverse swing is done or they will ban Reverse Swing altogether.
Ball does not reverse swing unless the ball is polished or shined on 1 side while the others is allowed to roughed up. This method of shining the ball is not ball tampering. This was the task of the entire Pakistan side to shine 1 side of the ball. It was done by spit, other side roughed up quickly in Pakistan because lack of grass. And the bowlers tried to land the ball on the rough part so it will Scuff up faster. The other part of reverse Swing was the grip and Pace.

Imran Khan tampered a ball once with bottle cap in a County match, which he admitted in a book he wrote.
Ball tampering accusation was a Black Mail done by English Cricket to get Pakistan to reveal the Secret of Reverse swing.

What Pakistanis were Guilty of was Match Fixing. Which started in the 90s.
 
The unique technique of polishing one side was hinted many times by many Pakistan players before it became common knowledge, which was always picked out as admission of Ball tampering by other teams. Most Pakistani Players were and still are not media Savvy they always ended up saying what they didnt mean and it is easy to twist words and their meaning for a Media that is out to get confessions.
 
"Imran, Waqar, Sarfaraz Nawaz were all ball-tamperers" Wrong, this was a slur given to them because they were reverse swinging the Ball.
Because Reverse swing was a closely guarded secret of Pakistan until Wasim and Waqar gave it away first to their own Counties in England and then to Indian Pacers By Wasim Akram. Now it is something that everyone knows. In early 90s English papers were calling Reverse Swing as cheating now it is called an Art. There was an article in English paper were they demanded Pakistan to reveal how Reverse swing is done or they will ban Reverse Swing altogether.
Ball does not reverse swing unless the ball is polished or shined on 1 side while the others is allowed to roughed up. This method of shining the ball is not ball tampering. This was the task of the entire Pakistan side to shine 1 side of the ball. It was done by spit, other side roughed up quickly in Pakistan because lack of grass. And the bowlers tried to land the ball on the rough part so it will Scuff up faster. The other part of reverse Swing was the grip and Pace.

Imran Khan tampered a ball once with bottle cap in a County match, which he admitted in a book he wrote.
Ball tampering accusation was a Black Mail done by English Cricket to get Pakistan to reveal the Secret of Reverse swing.

What Pakistanis were Guilty of was Match Fixing. Which started in the 90s.

Waqar, in 2000, became the first bowler to be banned for ball-tampering.

The 1992 series in England saw an unprecedented level of ball-tampering. There was nothing legal or sporting about it.

All Pakistani fast bowlers were cheats. However, Wasim and Imran were genuine world class bowlers with the new ball as well unlike Waqar.

Waqar owed his career to ball-tampering. Without ball-tampering, he would not have half the career that he did.

If he bowled today, he would be a run of the mill bowler who would get smashed in LOIs 9 out of 10 times.

The “banana” yorkers that Waqar bowled were not possible with balls that were not heavily tampered.

What Asif said about Waqar few weeks back is true.

Mohammad Asif speaking in an interview:

"The reverse swing that Waqar Younis used to get, we in Punjabi call it 'dabbee ball'; He only learnt to use the new ball when he was close to retirement; Before that he would cheat with the ball"

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...-would-cheat-with-the-ball-quot-Mohammad-Asif

If the likes of Naseem, Rauf, Hasnain etc. were bowling in the 80s and early 90s with the type of balls that Waqar, Imran, Wasim etc. did and against tail-enders who could not even hold a bat, they would also run riot.

It is not surprising that the quality of Pakistan’s fast bowling tumbled with the rise of HD cameras and greater scrutiny on ball-tampering.
 
Waqar, in 2000, became the first bowler to be banned for ball-tampering.

The 1992 series in England saw an unprecedented level of ball-tampering. There was nothing legal or sporting about it.

All Pakistani fast bowlers were cheats. However, Wasim and Imran were genuine world class bowlers with the new ball as well unlike Waqar.

Waqar owed his career to ball-tampering. Without ball-tampering, he would not have half the career that he did.

If he bowled today, he would be a run of the mill bowler who would get smashed in LOIs 9 out of 10 times.

The “banana” yorkers that Waqar bowled were not possible with balls that were not heavily tampered.

What Asif said about Waqar few weeks back is true.



http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...-would-cheat-with-the-ball-quot-Mohammad-Asif

If the likes of Naseem, Rauf, Hasnain etc. were bowling in the 80s and early 90s with the type of balls that Waqar, Imran, Wasim etc. did and against tail-enders who could not even hold a bat, they would also run riot.

It is not surprising that the quality of Pakistan’s fast bowling tumbled with the rise of HD cameras and greater scrutiny on ball-tampering.


Mohd Asif Is a spot fixer and a lier. Who is angry he was not allowed back. Oppostion players will catch you within a day if you tampered with the ball, 1992 was when England tried to black mail Pakistan to give up their Reverse swing Secret. You Started watching cricket 1998 so you dont know.

You are making sweeping statements calling all Pakistan bowlers as cheats. Which is utterly false and a prejudiced statement. Waqar Younis Was highly rated by a long list of cricketing greats and people who played against nhim. So Geoff Boycott is Blind who still to this day Thinks Waqar was an All time great Pace Bowler? What About Alec Stewart was he blind as well? What about Martin Crowe?

I understand that you Hate Pakistan for some reason. But you are making False and derogatory statements. Like Hi def Cameras cause decline of Pakistan's Fast Bowlers. Great Bowlers don't come every day. So you just made up that accusation
 
Mohd Asif Is a spot fixer and a lier. Who is angry he was not allowed back. Oppostion players will catch you within a day if you tampered with the ball, 1992 was when England tried to black mail Pakistan to give up their Reverse swing Secret. You Started watching cricket 1998 so you dont know.

You are making sweeping statements calling all Pakistan bowlers as cheats. Which is utterly false and a prejudiced statement. Waqar Younis Was highly rated by a long list of cricketing greats and people who played against nhim. So Geoff Boycott is Blind who still to this day Thinks Waqar was an All time great Pace Bowler? What About Alec Stewart was he blind as well? What about Martin Crowe?

I understand that you Hate Pakistan for some reason. But you are making False and derogatory statements. Like Hi def Cameras cause decline of Pakistan's Fast Bowlers. Great Bowlers don't come every day. So you just made up that accusation

Asif might be a liar and a cheat but he was a far better bowler than Waqar with the new ball. If both of them played together there is no doubt Asif would have outshone him in Test cricket.

I don’t hate Pakistan cricket. However, I don’t see any reason why we should whitewash our ball-tampering history and shy away from the fact that all our fast bowlers back in the day tampered heavily with the ball to get it to reverse.

As far as getting caught by the opposition is concerned, ball-tampering was the norm at the time. Almost all teams tried to do it at some point, but obviously the likes of Imran, Wasim, Waqar etc. were more skilled at it.

I am not suggesting or implying that Pakistani bowlers were the only ones who tampered with the ball. With poor cameras and lack of vigilance by the umpires, a lot of teams/bowlers tried to tamper.

My point is that the Pakistani bowlers, especially Waqar, were huge beneficiaries of ball-tampering and if inflated their records. If Waqar played today, there is no doubt he would be a much lesser bowler and he would get bashed on PP for his high economy rate and for failing in Test cricket in venues in like Australia.

The narrative that our bowlers (or those in other teams) only shined the ball naturally and did not use bottle-caps and fingernails to scratch the ball, and that Imran used bottle-caps only once in a County match is an outright lie.

Read this from Kiran More:

Former wicketkeeper Kiran More has revealed that ball tampering was rife during the Test series between India and Pakistan in 1989 and how players from both teams would keep ‘scratching the ball’ to generate reverse swing.

The series More is referring to was India’s tour of Pakistan in 1989, which saw the debuts of Sachin Tendulkar and Waqar Younis.

However, as More pointed out, the real talking point of the series was how the players would tamper with the ball to suit themselves and umpires would have a minimal role in dishing out penalties for the offence.

“In those days, scratching the ball was allowed, so you used to get reverse swing, big time,” More said on The Greatest Rivalry podcast.

“It was like, nobody used to complain from both sides. Everybody used to scratch the ball and reverse swing the ball. It was difficult to bat, it was not easy to bat.

Even Manoj Prabhakar learned on that team how to scratch that ball and reverse swing that ball and Pakistan found it challenging.”

Also read this from umpire John Holder:

John Holder, one of the umpires from the series, had in an interview said that he tried to discuss the matter with the two captains – Imran Khan and Kris Srikkanth – but there would be no outcome since there weren’t many offences you could hand out punishments for. Holder, a former English First-Class cricketer, officiated in his first Test match in 1988 and retired after 27 seasons in 2009.

“A wicket would fall – and in those days the umpires didn’t necessarily get hold of the ball after every over – and the players would just stand there scratching it.

And it got to a point where despite what we had to say on the field, we had to get the two captains and the two managers together. We said this is illegal,” Holder had told Mid-Day in 2018.

“The problem was we were powerless, because there were no sanctions we could apply.

Later there was a rewrite of the laws and they decided to bring penalty runs in for ball-tampering. And then they decided you could ban the bowler from bowling for the rest of the innings.”

Also read this:

On the morning of the first day of the final Test at Faisalabad, Pringle decided to put what he had learned into practice.

He found an old bottle top, cut it into quarters, covered the serrated edge with tape, leaving a sharp point exposed.

At the first drinks interval the umpires did not ask to look at the ball and, with Pakistan making sedate progress, Pringle started scratching the ball with the bottle top.

Pakistan crashed from 35 for 0 to 102 all out. Pringle finished with his Test-best figures of 7 for 52.

If you want to say that Pakistani bowlers were the best ball-tampers and the most skilled bowlers to bowl with tampered balls, that would be a valid statement.

However, to claim that they did not tamper with the ball, or the methods that they use were simply natural would be a completely dishonest and disingenuous stance.

Pakistani bowlers were cheats. Were they better cheats than the other bowlers at the time? Yes. However, they were cheats nonetheless.

If that degree of ball-tampering was still achievable, there is no doubt Pakistan would have produced 2-3 more genuine strike bowlers over the last 30 odd years and at least someone who would have come close to the type of numbers and impact someone like Waqar had.

Shaheen Afridi is capable of bowling world class yorkers with balls that are far less helpful than the tampered balls Waqar wreaked havoc with in his prime. Give those balls to Shaheen today and watch what he does.

It goes for some other bowlers as well. Imagine Starc and Malinga bowling with those tampered balls in the 80s and early 90s against tail-enders who could not even hold a bat and were genuinely scared of facing anything above 85 mph.

They would run through lineups on almost daily basis.

You can actually check Starc’s stats before Australia got caught in Cape Town in 2018. They were involved in proper ball-tampering and Starc was producing ATG numbers in 2017-2018.
 
Asif might be a liar and a cheat but he was a far better bowler than Waqar with the new ball. If both of them played together there is no doubt Asif would have outshone him in Test cricket.

I don’t hate Pakistan cricket. However, I don’t see any reason why we should whitewash our ball-tampering history and shy away from the fact that all our fast bowlers back in the day tampered heavily with the ball to get it to reverse.

As far as getting caught by the opposition is concerned, ball-tampering was the norm at the time. Almost all teams tried to do it at some point, but obviously the likes of Imran, Wasim, Waqar etc. were more skilled at it.

I am not suggesting or implying that Pakistani bowlers were the only ones who tampered with the ball. With poor cameras and lack of vigilance by the umpires, a lot of teams/bowlers tried to tamper.

My point is that the Pakistani bowlers, especially Waqar, were huge beneficiaries of ball-tampering and if inflated their records. If Waqar played today, there is no doubt he would be a much lesser bowler and he would get bashed on PP for his high economy rate and for failing in Test cricket in venues in like Australia.

The narrative that our bowlers (or those in other teams) only shined the ball naturally and did not use bottle-caps and fingernails to scratch the ball, and that Imran used bottle-caps only once in a County match is an outright lie.

Read this from Kiran More:



Also read this from umpire John Holder:



Also read this:



If you want to say that Pakistani bowlers were the best ball-tampers and the most skilled bowlers to bowl with tampered balls, that would be a valid statement.

However, to claim that they did not tamper with the ball, or the methods that they use were simply natural would be a completely dishonest and disingenuous stance.

Pakistani bowlers were cheats. Were they better cheats than the other bowlers at the time? Yes. However, they were cheats nonetheless.

If that degree of ball-tampering was still achievable, there is no doubt Pakistan would have produced 2-3 more genuine strike bowlers over the last 30 odd years and at least someone who would have come close to the type of numbers and impact someone like Waqar had.

Shaheen Afridi is capable of bowling world class yorkers with balls that are far less helpful than the tampered balls Waqar wreaked havoc with in his prime. Give those balls to Shaheen today and watch what he does.

It goes for some other bowlers as well. Imagine Starc and Malinga bowling with those tampered balls in the 80s and early 90s against tail-enders who could not even hold a bat and were genuinely scared of facing anything above 85 mph.

They would run through lineups on almost daily basis.

You can actually check Starc’s stats before Australia got caught in Cape Town in 2018. They were involved in proper ball-tampering and Starc was producing ATG numbers in 2017-2018.

If you have ever been to a dressing room or a dug out where coaches and the Team sits. You would know that Opposition continuously monitors the condition of the ball. Waqar Younis would have been banned with in 6 months rather an have a long career that he did.
You are making it all up that balls were tampered. No matter how many times you repeat it is still a lie. You have no proof and no knowledge of the game either.
That series against India was a tame draw, so Tampering produced no result.

"Pakistani bowlers were cheats" So all Pakistani bowlers are cheats. That is a prejudiced statement
 
If you have ever been to a dressing room or a dug out where coaches and the Team sits. You would know that Opposition continuously monitors the condition of the ball. Waqar Younis would have been banned with in 6 months rather an have a long career that he did.
You are making it all up that balls were tampered. No matter how many times you repeat it is still a lie. You have no proof and no knowledge of the game either.
That series against India was a tame draw, so Tampering produced no result.

"Pakistani bowlers were cheats" So all Pakistani bowlers are cheats. That is a prejudiced statement

Not in the 80s and 90s. The batting dressing room did not even have the resources to continuously monitor the ball.

There were no HD cameras, few slow-mos, the umpires were not very strict and did not monitor the state of the ball closely. ICC on the whole was not very serious about ball-tampering.

At this point, you don’t even know what you are talking about and have no idea where you are going with your argument.

You just don’t want to acknowledge that Pakistani bowlers, starting with Sarfraz Nawaz, were ball-tamperers.

Yes that Indian series was a tame draw, but it does not mean that ball-tampering did not take place.

Ball-tampering does not always produce results but it does most of the time. If it produced result in every series and every match, Imran, Wasim and Waqar would be averaging in the early teens and not 20s.

Anyway, this is not the right thread to discuss this topic as directed by MenInG.
 
Not in the 80s and 90s. The batting dressing room did not even have the resources to continuously monitor the ball.

There were no HD cameras, few slow-mos, the umpires were not very strict and did not monitor the state of the ball closely. ICC on the whole was not very serious about ball-tampering.

At this point, you don’t even know what you are talking about and have no idea where you are going with your argument.

You just don’t want to acknowledge that Pakistani bowlers, starting with Sarfraz Nawaz, were ball-tamperers.

Yes that Indian series was a tame draw, but it does not mean that ball-tampering did not take place.

Ball-tampering does not always produce results but it does most of the time. If it produced result in every series and every match, Imran, Wasim and Waqar would be averaging in the early teens and not 20s.

Anyway, this is not the right thread to discuss this topic as directed by MenInG.

You are making this all up. You dont need HD cameras to check ball tampering, Batsmen in the middle know because they are looking at the shape of the ball continuously. Batsman and umpires. Coaches & others are also aware. That is true for even at club level. Dressing room knows because they are communicating with Batsmen in the middle, every time the 12 players brings a towel or a drink.

So According to Kiran More everyone was tampering, so You should by that logic start Calling Indian bowlers as cheats.
So we should discard all cricket that was played in 80 and 90s and before that because ball tampering can't Possibly be checked back then.

"ICC on the whole was not very serious about ball-tampering" Really who told you that. So While no one was checking only the Pakistanis Cheated and nobody else. If nobody was checking how do you know no one else were cheating.

You are just making up stuff, which is highly insulting to Pakistan cricket and full of prejudice.
 
Last edited:
You are making this all up. You dont need HD cameras to check ball tampering, Batsmen in the middle know because they are looking at the shape of the ball continuously. Batsman and umpires. Coaches & others are also aware. That is true for even at club level. Dressing room knows because they are communicating with Batsmen in the middle, every time the 12 players brings a towel or a drink.

So According to Kiran More everyone was tampering, so You should by that logic start Calling Indian bowlers as cheats.
So we should discard all cricket that was played in 80 and 90s and before that because ball tampering can't Possibly be checked back then.

"ICC on the whole was not very serious about ball-tampering" Really who told you that. So While no one was checking only the Pakistanis Cheated and nobody else. If nobody was checking how do you know no one else were cheating.

You are just making up stuff, which is highly insulting to Pakistan cricket and full of prejudice.

Not really, it's all common knowledge, unless you are insinuating that folks such as Martin Crowe lacked integrity.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/102573254/when-new-zealand-ball-tampered-got-away-with-it-and-nearly-won-a-test-in-pakistan
 
I think Waqar was a great of the game specially between 1990 and 1995. He would have found other ways of dominating the opposition if reverse swing was taken out his armoury.
 
Mamoon says Pakistan bowlers were cheats, but the only thing with his arguments are that they are heavily prejudiced against Pakistan bowlers.

If they tampered with the ball, they weren’t the only ones, and certainly did not invent tampering. It has been happening long before in county cricket, Australia with the sun creams etc. So why only highlight Pakistan?

Apart from you being obviously just always negative about Pakistan (as always), the simple fact is Wasim, Waqar, Imran were a lot more skilful and had pace to execute reverse swing. They were pioneers if it, and the W’s were so good like fiery boycott said they only needed a few oranges to bowl teams out.

All this nonsense Asif WOULD HAVE been this and that if he continued maybe true to an extent but the fact is it didn’t happen and he was the big match fixer cheat who got caught out. Wasim & Waqars record HAS been proven and any might have if this and that did or did not stuff is irrelevant.

Amazes me how a convicted cheat and match fixer like Asif (no morales and ethics there), all of a sudden has morals and ethics about ball tampering. It’s just jealousy and sour grapes which Asif gas himself to blame.
 
Bowling with the old ball is just as important and requires more skill probably than the new ball.

About Waqar, all this nonsense that he MAY or would have not been as good if he didn’t execute reverse swing are just speculation. How can anyone know or be so sure.

If Waqar didn’t have thee reverse swing he would have likely adapted as he had the skill and pace to adapt and wasn’t too different to Shoaib Akhtar. This isn’t speculation as such because when Waqar was overall in decline in the late stages of his career he did adapt and was good with the new ball. If he could learn that when he needed during the twilight of his career then he most definitely could have learnt the same early on and during his peak.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
After reading this thread I no longer consider Waqar Younis the great of the game. Too much proof against him to be the best.
 
Last edited:
What always made me laugh about this is that the English and the Aussies were loudest in their calls for "ball tampering" when the great Pakistani pace bowlers of the 80s and 90s were reversing the ball....but they themselves learned reverse swing from those fast bowlers. Fast forward to 2005 and the entire English press labelled it an "art form".

What makes this even more funny is that more non Pakistanis have been caught ball tampering than Pakistanis :yk

In my opinion and the opinions of many I suspect, the Australians have been caught in the worst case of what I label "ball corruption", systemic throughout their international set up AT LEAST. :rp
 
Wasim and Waqar took bowling to a new and different level.

They were leaders, others were followers, as the likes of Darren Gough have said.
 
Not really, it's all common knowledge, unless you are insinuating that folks such as Martin Crowe lacked integrity.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/102573254/when-new-zealand-ball-tampered-got-away-with-it-and-nearly-won-a-test-in-pakistan
















This is from the time Reverse Swing technique was a secret, oppostions resorted to tactics like that to counter something they didn't know how to do. Once Reverse Swing techniques were revealed it became an art form.

Part of the Technique to Reverse swing the ball was the unique technique of Polishing one side and letting the other side Rough up. This conditioning of the ball in this way is legal. Teams who did not knew this secret, invariably suspected something wrong. That's All. They tampered with the ball but the ball would still not reverse. They would get wickets with the tampered ball but it won't reverse like the Waqar and Wasim did

I am not Insinuting anybody.
 
Unfortunately the way it is, is that if players from some countries do something different or better, it's looked at with suspicion by some nations until they can do it as well.

This is exactly what happened with reverse-swing.
 
Bowling with the old ball is just as important and requires more skill probably than the new ball.

About Waqar, all this nonsense that he MAY or would have not been as good if he didn’t execute reverse swing are just speculation. How can anyone know or be so sure.

If Waqar didn’t have thee reverse swing he would have likely adapted as he had the skill and pace to adapt and wasn’t too different to Shoaib Akhtar. This isn’t speculation as such because when Waqar was overall in decline in the late stages of his career he did adapt and was good with the new ball. If he could learn that when he needed during the twilight of his career then he most definitely could have learnt the same early on and during his peak.

He would have adapted to new ball is also just an assumption, who stopped him to adapt when he was at his peak. On the other hand wasim was outstanding with the old ball and very good with the new ball too. Yes, waqar improved as a new ball bowler in the later stages but that too was just pretty average, it was not like that he transformed himself into a world beater. And during his peak also he was a one dimensional bowler whose only wicket taking delivery was inswinging one, maybe that's the reason he was successful only against weaker teams.
 
He could have learned with the new ball early on in his career but he was too damn good with the old ball, unplayable at times and that 'one dimension' worked so well for him so why stop and try something else when your so good at something working well.
 
He could have learned with the new ball early on in his career but he was too damn good with the old ball, unplayable at times and that 'one dimension' worked so well for him so why stop and try something else when your so good at something working well.
That worked only against weaker teams and that damn good thing was never reflected against Australia, South Africa or west Indies which were stronger teams of that era.
 
He should have learnt but he didn’t earlier on his career with the new ball. His record should have been better against them teams but wasn’t as good. ( I remember him almost alone destroying South Africa in an odi in 1993), but yes your right to an extent. Also he was lucky to have good bowlers in Wasim and Aaqib who bowled well with the new ball.

Whatever could have and should have happened but not many (apart from some few Pak fans) would argue against him being a very fine bowler.
 
He should have learnt but he didn’t earlier on his career with the new ball. His record should have been better against them teams but wasn’t as good. ( I remember him almost alone destroying South Africa in an odi in 1993), but yes your right to an extent. Also he was lucky to have good bowlers in Wasim and Aaqib who bowled well with the new ball.

Whatever could have and should have happened but not many (apart from some few Pak fans) would argue against him being a very fine bowler.
Yes that's what I meant that if he could have learnt early on his career then we would not have seen that dramatic downfall from 1996. And that would have helped him taking wickets against the quality sides. No doubt he was outstanding with the old ball but he used to get destroyed in his early spells whenever he takes the new ball against good teams.
 
I am sick to the core of this scripted narrative that both Waqar & Wasim use, that ‘Martin Crowe played reverse swing the best blah blah blah’

Today Bazid asked Waqar who other than Martin Crowe played reverse swing best and Waqar still went on about Martin Crowe and his technique. I mean how more dumb can Waqar be.

I know as a follower of the 90s cricket that for example Richie Richardson with his red hat on was impossible to get out even with reverse swing. Why does Waqar not recharge his brain batteries and say something new.
 
Last edited:
I am sick to the core of this scripted narrative that both Waqar & Wasim use, that ‘Martin Crowe played reverse swing the best blah blah blah’

Today Bazid asked Waqar who other than Martin Crowe played reverse swing best and Waqar still went on about Martin Crowe and his technique. I mean how more dumb can Waqar be.

I know as a follower of the 90s cricket that for example Richie Richardson with his red hat on was impossible to get out even with reverse swing. Why does Waqar not recharge his brain batteries and say something new.

Well if he reckons it was Martin Crowe then what's wrong with that?
 
I am sick to the core of this scripted narrative that both Waqar & Wasim use, that ‘Martin Crowe played reverse swing the best blah blah blah’

Today Bazid asked Waqar who other than Martin Crowe played reverse swing best and Waqar still went on about Martin Crowe and his technique. I mean how more dumb can Waqar be.

I know as a follower of the 90s cricket that for example Richie Richardson with his red hat on was impossible to get out even with reverse swing. Why does Waqar not recharge his brain batteries and say something new.

Bhai thats their opinion. Tendulkar once said he found Cronje the most difficult bowler. Atleast the 2Ws have taken the name of a truly world class player.
 
That worked only against weaker teams and that damn good thing was never reflected against Australia, South Africa or west Indies which were stronger teams of that era.

Simpleton mentality again. He did against West Indies in 1990/91 and 1993. You know the best team in the world at the time.

Did it vs England when they had the no1 and no2 batsmen in the world. The same england team that drew 2-2 to a still formidable West Indies team the year before.

The age old and tired Australia argument. The only time he played Australia near his peak was in 1994 and he took 8 wickets in the first test in Karachi that Pakistan won.

In 1996 he literally just returned from a back injury with a lengthy layoff and wasn’t fully fit and rusty. He still managed to polish off the tail in the last test.

1999 Waqar was past it but bowled a beautiful spell in Hobart.

Stop looking at silly stats and analyse for a change
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Stuart Broad on bowling with a reverse swing ball &#55356;&#57235;&#55358;&#56596; <a href="https://t.co/xDMwHkrMuL">pic.twitter.com/xDMwHkrMuL</a></p>— Sky Sports Cricket (@SkyCricket) <a href="https://twitter.com/SkyCricket/status/1601844614926897153?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 11, 2022</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
English bowlers have wiped the floor with the Pakistani pacers as far as reverse swing is concerned. Even Starc and Cummins reversed the ball way more effectively in comparison to the Pakistani bowlers.

Extremely alarming situation.
 
Back
Top