What's new

Bangladesh will provide Sri Lanka with $200 million to $250 million dollars!

Imran Hasan

Local Club Regular
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Runs
1,328
In a first for Bangladesh, the country has extended a lifeline of sorts to the beleaguered Sri Lankan economy, offering to top up the island nation's depleting foreign reserves by as much as $500 million.

The global coronavirus pandemic has deprived Sri Lanka, which has $3.7 billion of foreign debt maturing this year, of important sources of foreign currency such as tourism and exports.


Its $4.5 billion tourism industry, which was already reeling from the 2019 Easter Sunday bombings that killed 279 people, was hit particularly hard, while its exports were down about 17 percent in 2020.

At the end of April, Sri Lanka's foreign exchange reserves stood at about $4 billion, which is enough to cover the import bills for three months.

On the other hand, Bangladesh's reserves are hitting a new high each month. At the end of April, reserves crossed the $45 billion-mark for the first time.

The two countries are hoping to enter into a currency swap arrangement, initiated during Sri Lankan Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa's visit to Bangladesh in March for the Golden Jubilee celebrations.

The arrangement would allow Colombo to exchange Sri Lankan rupees for $200 million from the Bangladesh Bank, with the amount rising to $500 million.

The BB board has approved in principal to provide $200 million initially at the meeting on Sunday, according to Md. Serajul Islam, its spokesperson.

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka is expected to return the amount in three months at the interest rate of LIBOR + 2 percent. If the tenure goes up to six months, the interest rate would be LIBOR + 2.5 percent, said Islam, also an executive director of the BB.

LIBOR, the acronym for London Interbank Offer Rate, is the global reference rate for unsecured short-term borrowing in the interbank market and acts as a benchmark for short-term interest rates.

This week, the three-month LIBOR is 0.16 percent and 0.18 percent.

For Sri Lanka, whose public and publicly guaranteed debt is estimated to have increased to 109.7 percent of GDP, this is not the first currency swap agreement it has entered into this year as it desperately looks for hard currency to bolster its reserves.

Earlier in March, it has inked a 10-billion-yuan ($1.54 billion) currency swap with China.

Sri Lanka, whose economy contracted 3.6 percent in 2020, its worst growth performance on record, had sought a $1 billion currency swap agreement with India in September last year.

But India, which had already extended a $400 million currency swap facility two months earlier, declined the request unless the island nation entered into an International Monetary Fund debt programme, which comes with a stringent fiscal consolidation prescription.

Only nine of the 16 IMF programmes in Sri Lanka were completed.

Besides, Colombo is loath to turning to the Washington-based multilateral lender. Over the past 55 years, Sri Lanka has needed IMF bailouts 16 times, second only to Pakistan, which has gone to the IMF 20 times.

Sri Lanka last went to the IMF in 2016, seeking a $1.5 billion extended fund facility.

But that programme came to an abrupt end after the Rajapaksa government came to power in November last year.

Sri Lanka's precarious public finances meant in September last year, Moody's, one of the three major rating agencies, downgraded the South Asian nation's sovereign credit rating by two notches: from "B2" (high credit risk) to "Caa1" (very high credit risk).

Moody's said the South Asian nation would be hard-pressed to secure funding to service its huge foreign debt, which amounts to approximately $4 billion (annually) between 2020 and 2025.

But extending financial help to its South Asian neighbour in its hour of need makes perfect sense to Bangladesh, which is at its wits' end over how to make the best use of its heaving foreign reserves in the face of negative interest rates in the Western world.

Usually, such currency swap arrangements happen between the central banks of a wealthier nation and a not too well-off one, said Ahsan H Mansur, executive director of the Policy Research Institute, a private think-tank.

"The fact that Bangladesh is the one providing the dollars is a good ego booster," he said, adding that Pakistan routinely enters into such agreements.

There are risks involved in such deals.

"There is an exchange rate risk involved, but that is on Sri Lanka. There is a country risk too -- what if Sri Lanka becomes insolvent?"

The sum being lent out is not a small amount, said Mansur, a former economist of the IMF.

"But what Bangladesh is getting is a good rate -- under the current circumstances."



https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...ladesh-steps-sri-lankas-hour-need-2098805?amp
 
Good from Bangladesh! In shallah, Pakistan will also be in a similar position in a few years time, our economy is picking up!
 
Getting freedom from Pakistan is the best thing that could have happened to Bangladesh. Imagine the state of its economy if it was still East Pakistan.
 
Good from Bangladesh! In shallah, Pakistan will also be in a similar position in a few years time, our economy is picking up!

Well done to Bangladesh and yes great things to come from Pakistan! Lets hope IK/PTI stay in Government for at least two more terms and by which time the mafia's back would have been broken.
 
Getting freedom from Pakistan is the best thing that could have happened to Bangladesh. Imagine the state of its economy if it was still East Pakistan.

That means that the creation of Pakistan was actually the best thing that could have happened to Bangladesh, otherwise they would have still been part of India.
 
Bangladesh under Sheikh Hasina has reached new heights and levels of maturity. I applaud her excellence. Well done !
 
Getting freedom from Pakistan is the best thing that could have happened to Bangladesh. Imagine the state of its economy if it was still East Pakistan.

Likewise, Pakistan has now freedom from crooks like Bhuttos, Sharifs and others. It can only flourish as the recent GDP growth during COVID has shown. Funny how you blame Pakistan but no fault lies with the political parties that you support. Funny how you ran away from my post where I exposed the incompetence of PMLN in its era. I know it is hard for you to digest now that Pakistan is getting back on its feet. Pakistan Zindabad!
 
That means that the creation of Pakistan was actually the best thing that could have happened to Bangladesh, otherwise they would have still been part of India.

Good to see that you jumped from tidbits from 1000 AD to 1947 momentarily but Bangladesh has had a great relationship with India and have more or less been relatively secular with their minority population at least compared to Pakistan since 1971. They focused on trade and diplomacy rather than rabid religious fanaticism.

Anyway baby steps. Might take a while to catch-up to 1971 for ya but your point would hold value if East Pakistan was a land of milk and honey from 1947-1971.
 
Good to see that you jumped from tidbits from 1000 AD to 1947 momentarily but Bangladesh has had a great relationship with India and have more or less been relatively secular with their minority population at least compared to Pakistan since 1971. They focused on trade and diplomacy rather than rabid religious fanaticism.

Anyway baby steps. Might take a while to catch-up to 1971 for ya but your point would hold value if East Pakistan was a land of milk and honey from 1947-1971.

My point was merely an expansion of the one raised by the poster I quoted. You can take it up with him if you have any issues, was not me who dragged Pakistan or India into this discussion.
 
Bangladesh has been heading in the right direction under the leadership Sheikh Hasina. She has successfully dealt with the right-wing with an iron fist, promoted trade, birth control and education instead of poking nose into others’s affairs and acting as the gatekeepers of Islam.

She has tried hard to elevate the living standards of her own people and the ground realities show her hard work and commitment. She has shown tremendous guts and bravery and took hard decisions and stuck to them. Our crop of politicians can learn a lot from her.

Bangladesh would never have prospered if it was still a part of Pakistan due to our illogical, dumb and inhuman policies.
 
Getting freedom from Pakistan is the best thing that could have happened to Bangladesh. Imagine the state of its economy if it was still East Pakistan.

Truer words have never been spoken.
 
bangladesh has been heading in the right direction for a long time. the precursor to everything was there succesful family planning program, they managed to control their population in the mid 90s and that has been one of the foundation policies of their success.

but bangladesh has a significantly more homogeneous ehtno-linguistic makeup than pakistan, furthermore good relations with its neighbours and significant urbanisation have also helped.

pakistan will get there eventually, but they need to learn from bangladesh that its the private sector that will drive long term growth.
 
Well done to Bangladesh.

They're clearly doing better than us too.
 
bangladesh has been heading in the right direction for a long time. the precursor to everything was there succesful family planning program, they managed to control their population in the mid 90s and that has been one of the foundation policies of their success.

but bangladesh has a significantly more homogeneous ehtno-linguistic makeup than pakistan, furthermore good relations with its neighbours and significant urbanisation have also helped.

pakistan will get there eventually, but they need to learn from bangladesh that its the private sector that will drive long term growth.

She may not be a true democratic leader, but whatever you think about Hasina, it seems that she did push hard on the private sector against some pretty staunch socialist mindset that was prevalent in BD at the time. Although the population control measures must have been a previous administration, maybe she is reaping some benefit of groundwork laid before her time.
 
Good to see that you jumped from tidbits from 1000 AD to 1947 momentarily but Bangladesh has had a great relationship with India and have more or less been relatively secular with their minority population at least compared to Pakistan since 1971. They focused on trade and diplomacy rather than rabid religious fanaticism.

Anyway baby steps. Might take a while to catch-up to 1971 for ya but your point would hold value if East Pakistan was a land of milk and honey from 1947-1971.

Yet their minority population has been declining since 71 (cant blame Pakistan for that), while Pakistan minority population has increased since 1951. Not to mention Pakistan gives religious quota for minority, in parliament and jobs.
 
Well done to Bangladesh.

They're clearly doing better than us too.
NEW DELHI: India has technically slipped below Bangladesh in terms of per capita income as the neighbouring country reported its per capita income at $2,227 in the financial year 2020-21— over 9 per cent jump from $2,064 in 2019-20. Latest official data show that India’s per capita income reached $1,947.417, thanks to the sharp contraction in the economic growth due to Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent nationwide lockdown.

https://www.newindianexpress.com/bu...beats-india-in-per-capita-income-2304942.html
 
Back
Top