What's new

Ben Stokes found not guilty of affray [Update Post #508]

Depends on the offence. A Magistrate can impose a two year custodial sentence for breach of the Health and Safety Act.

Th only way this gets kicked up to Crown Court is if Stokes is found guilty and appeals against the decision.

he court can give punishments including:

up to 6 months in prison (or up to 12 months in total for more than one offence)
a fine of up to £5,000
a community sentence, like doing unpaid work in the community

https://www.gov.uk/courts

This is a criminal charge so the maximum he can get in a magistrates is 12 months.

Its irrelevent as everyone knows he wont go to jail. Im sure he will play in the IPL and then be back to face Pakistan in the spring.
 
To me, any charge that can lead to a prison sentence is serious enough.
 
Bad news for England fans, [I'm an England fan but not English] but this is good news. No one is above the law, and after watching that video, there's no way Stokes deserves to be a free man after that.

He could've killed a person, homophobes don't deserve fractured eye sockets and people who do that deserve to be in prison.

If he was a nobody, no one would want the guy in that video to be walking the streets unpunished. If our players can spend time in an English prison over bowling some no-balls, then their players should be in prison for nearly killing someone and banned for a substantial period outside that sentence.

ECB don't want to stop him from playing IPL, but he's contracted to them and there's not even a legal justification for denying him an NOB.

I'm a big fan of Stokes, he's good for cricket in general as a player, but he's young and spending a year or two out of the game seems perfectly fair.
 
By most accounts, it sounds like Stokes intends to rely on the defence of "self-defence or defence of others". But the video shows that his actions went well beyond self-defence. I do not see how else he can get away with it.

The fact the 'victim' is being charged with the same offence suggest that the police obtained further evidence than simply just the video available to the public.
 
Oh dear, affray is a serious charge. Don't condone what he's done but for his future sake, hope he can avoid conviction as criminal record will have ramifications for his livelihood.

I mean to say this in a sincere and fair way, so I hope that's clear:

How would you feel if you saw this viral video and no one in it was famous?

Would you worry about their livelihood? Or if it was in your neighbourhood. Would you feel that your community is safe? Or that he shouldn't be punished?

He's lucky the charges aren't more serious. These are serious, but the charges could've been a lot worse.
 
[MENTION=43583]KingKhanWC[/MENTION] [MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION] thank you for your posts. Helpful for those of us who don't know much about UK law.
 
I mean to say this in a sincere and fair way, so I hope that's clear:

How would you feel if you saw this viral video and no one in it was famous?

Would you worry about their livelihood? Or if it was in your neighbourhood. Would you feel that your community is safe? Or that he shouldn't be punished?

He's lucky the charges aren't more serious. These are serious, but the charges could've been a lot worse.

I can only comment on the situation at hand, not on events that may or may not happen. My point was that regardless if your famous or not, a criminal conviction will hurt someone looking for employment amongst other things, especially if this is during the "unspent" period.

Of course, Stokes was very stupid to do what he did and does not absolve him from his misdemeanours. Also, as [MENTION=139981]HitWicket[/MENTION] states, the Police could have obtained further evidence in addition to a viral video. It will be down to the court to punish or not punish accordingly
 
They say one episode destroys your life. Stokes must be wishing that he kept his arrogance, ego in check and how mistaken he was that he could get away with anything.
 
https://www.gov.uk/courts

This is a criminal charge so the maximum he can get in a magistrates is 12 months.


Interesting, not what I was taught in Health and Safety school.

Affray is a common law charge not criminal law (so is murder, both having been common law offences long before there were even courts in England).
 
They say one episode destroys your life. Stokes must be wishing that he kept his arrogance, ego in check and how mistaken he was that he could get away with anything.

Oh come on, somebody came at his mate with a bottle in an alley in the dark, and he went into fight/flight mode. I doubt he thought anything at all, it was pure reaction.
 
Do high profile English players not get warned about getting into situations such as wandering around outside nightclubs at 3am, especially weeks from the start of the Ashes. Hence, minimising the risk of getting into touble yourself when someone comes at your mate with a bottle in a dark alley
 
I can only comment on the situation at hand, not on events that may or may not happen. My point was that regardless if your famous or not, a criminal conviction will hurt someone looking for employment amongst other things, especially if this is during the "unspent" period.

Of course, Stokes was very stupid to do what he did and does not absolve him from his misdemeanours. Also, as [MENTION=139981]HitWicket[/MENTION] states, the Police could have obtained further evidence in addition to a viral video. It will be down to the court to punish or not punish accordingly

You're right and no one should be punished after they've done their time. It ends up hurting their families as well. I can't be sympathetic to Stokes at this juncture, seeing as nothing's actually happened to him.

I don't want to get off. The way he was beating the guys up, I really can't accept that he isn't a veteran at beating people to a pulp. Men like him really can't learn better unless they have to suffer consequences of legal punishment.
 
Oh come on, somebody came at his mate with a bottle in an alley in the dark, and he went into fight/flight mode. I doubt he thought anything at all, it was pure reaction.

Not really, a lot of people can handle such situation tactfully and by involving the police. I know of one guy who dealt with someone who groped his partner in a club, he just threw one punch and that's it and eye witnesses testified it was self defence and the police accepted it because only one punch was thrown instead of 5-6 punches.
 
Following a full Board discussion, in which all considerations were taken into account, the ECB Board has agreed that Ben Stokes should now be considered for England selection.

Given the CPS decision to charge him and two others with affray, confirmation of his intention to contest the charge and the potential length of time to trial, the Board agreed that it would not be fair, reasonable or proportionate for Ben Stokes to remain unavailable for a further indeterminate period.

To date, Stokes has been unavailable for selection throughout the Police and CPS process around the incident in Bristol in September, a period which has included One-Day Internationals against West Indies, the Ashes tour and the start of the ODI series against Australia.

ECB fully respects the legal process and the player’s intention to defend himself against the charge.

England Selectors, management and players have been informed and Ben Stokes is expected to join the squad in New Zealand for February’s T20 matches.

ECB confirmed in December that the independent Cricket Discipline Commission [CDC] would stay the internal disciplinary process for both Alex Hales and Ben Stokes until the conclusion of court proceedings relating to the incident.
 
The only way I see the clearance aspect of this from the ECB is they most likely know Stokes won't get a heavy punishment and are expecting him to be playing very soon.
 
Surprised by this. I thought the conservative ECB would drop him until after he clears his name. If he clears his name.
 
Ben Stokes is now being considered for England selection and could make his international return in the T20I tri-series fixture against New Zealand on February 13, live on Sky Sports.

Stokes, absent from England duty, including the Ashes defeat in Australia, since being arrested outside a nightclub in Bristol in September, was charged with affray on Monday and will appear at Bristol Magistrates' Court at a later date.

But the all-rounder may line up for England at the Westpac Stadium in Wellington next month. We asked Sky Sports experts Nasser Hussain and Michael Atherton for their reaction...

NASSER HUSSAIN - 'An incredibly difficult decision'

It was an incredibly difficult decision to make for the ECB and I don't envy them - they were damned if they did and damned if they didn't. They have a person who has not been found guilty of anything in court of law and is going to contest the charge which means it is going to go on longer.

It seems odd that when he wasn't charged with anything he was not allowed to play for England and now that he has been charged with affray he is available, but you are innocent until proven guilty. It is a very complicated matter and they are saying this is going to drag on so long they are going to let him be available.

The ECB have to take a lot of things into the equation - the duty of care to the game, for a start. Do they want someone like Stokes, who has allegedly been involved in that sort of incident, to carry on playing?

They also have a duty of care to the individual - Ben must have been through hell in the last few months and don't think you are going to quietly sneak into New Zealand. It is an unforgiving place.

In the back of his mind he is going to have the fact that he has been charged with a very serious crime, so the selection panel have to put that in the equation. Is he fit mentally to perform at the highest level?

Will the media circus allow him to perform? Is it a risk worth taking? As a cricketer, there is no debate that he walks into any England side.

I'm not convinced the ECB could have handled the situation any differently. You can't have Stokes, under investigation, taking part in the Ashes - it was a no-no for me. England would have been a better team with him in it but with head-butt gate and people throwing beer over each other it would have become an absolute media circus, out of control.

The ECB did the right thing by taking him out of the firing line and looking after him.


MIKE ATHERTON - 'Illogical'

It seems illogical in certain respects given that they essentially suspended him for the last two or three months, since the event in Bristol, and are now allowing him to play, even though the CPS decision has still got some time to run. So it's hard to square the two positions. You'd think there would be some consistency shown all the way through.

Either you let him play for the past two or three months or you continue with the policy of what has happened up until now, with the effective suspension. It seems illogical to change course at this point and I think most people would find it hard to square the two positions.

There is going to be scrutiny whenever he comes back. Knowing Stokes, he is going to be thrilled to be allowed to play again but he'll obviously have to get fit and get some practice in.

He's only had that short amount of time in New Zealand, while the Ashes were going on, so he'll have to get himself in the right kind of physical shape and mental frame of mind to play. But he'll be desperate to get back.

http://www.skysports.com/cricket/ne...llogical-say-nasser-hussain-and-mike-atherton
 
The only way I see the clearance aspect of this from the ECB is they most likely know Stokes won't get a heavy punishment and are expecting him to be playing very soon.

How can the ECB know what the results of a charge will be before they go to court?

Admittedly I am now trying to figure out how serious a charge has to be to disqualify you from English selection. Obviously affray is not serious.
 
How can the ECB know what the results of a charge will be before they go to court?

Admittedly I am now trying to figure out how serious a charge has to be to disqualify you from English selection. Obviously affray is not serious.

Reports are because the case could take up to 18 months they can't suspend him for that length of time (without a conviction or guilty plea) without risking a legal case for restraint of trade as well as biasing the jury.
 
Last edited:
How can the ECB know what the results of a charge will be before they go to court?

Admittedly I am now trying to figure out how serious a charge has to be to disqualify you from English selection. Obviously affray is not serious.

It could be a case of Stokes' lawyers have spoken to the ECB and may have suggested [in their opinion] what could go down.

Also affray is a pretty serious offence but does have levels of seriousness too. Whatever Stokes' case is, I suspect it won't be the most serious offence of 6 months in prison and fine.
 
How can the ECB know what the results of a charge will be before they go to court?

Admittedly I am now trying to figure out how serious a charge has to be to disqualify you from English selection. Obviously affray is not serious.

Depends if he is found guilty of it.
 
England all-rounder Ben Stokes is "raring to go" after being made available for selection again, says head coach Trevor Bayliss.

The 26-year-old has been charged with affray after an incident outside a Bristol nightclub in September.

The England and Wales Cricket Board said on Wednesday that he is likely to join the squad for February's Twenty20 matches against New Zealand.

"He's a cricketer and just wants to be out there playing," Bayliss said.

"He's a very popular member of the team and the squad. I'm sure they'll be welcoming him back with open arms."

England#s T20 tri-series in Australia & New Zealand - schedule
Stokes, who has not played for England since the incident and intends to contest the charge against him, will join the squad for the second half of the triangular T20 series, which also involves co-hosts Australia.

He missed England's winter Ashes campaign and will play no part in the current limited-overs series against Australia, but the ECB allowed him to play domestic cricket in New Zealand in December.

"It might take him a little while to get back to speed but we'll just have to wait and see," Bayliss told BBC Sport.

"It's all about performance. I want him to be up and running and ready to go."

Bayliss said that he was happy with the board's decision to make Stokes available for selection, adding that the incident had not distracted the squad on their current tour of Australia.

"It was certainly something we'd much rather not had to deal with, but when the games came around they were fully focused on playing," the 55-year-old Australian said.

"I've got admiration for those guys that they were able to see past that and concentrate on the cricket."

Stokes and Anderson in ICC team of the year
Stokes was the only England player to be named in the International Cricket Council's men's one-day international team of 2017.

He also featured in the world governing body's Test side of the year, alongside pace bowler James Anderson.

The teams are selected based on performances between 21 September 2016 and 31 December 2017 - a period in which Stokes made three Test centuries and took two five-wicket hauls.

"I imagine Ben has been through quite a tough time and he'll probably relish the fact he can get out and do what he does best," Anderson said.

"He's so passionate - he loves playing for England. I think he'll be relishing the chance to get back out on the field."

Both sides were captained by India skipper Virat Kohli, who won the Sir Garfield Sobers Trophy for the overall World Cricketer of the Year.

ICC Test team of the year: Dean Elgar (South Africa), David Warner (Australia), Virat Kohli (India, capt), Steve Smith (Australia), Cheteshwar Pujara (India), Ben Stokes (England), Quinton de Kock (South Africa, wk), Ravichandran Ashwin (India), Mitchell Starc (Australia), Kagiso Rabada (South Africa), James Anderson (England).

ICC ODI team of the year: David Warner (Australia), Rohit Sharma (India), Virat Kohli (India, capt), Babar Azam (Pakistan), AB de Villiers (South Africa), Quinton de Kock (South Africa, wk), Ben Stokes (England), Trent Boult (New Zealand), Hasan Ali (Pakistan), Rashid Khan (Afghanistan), Jasprit Bumrah (India).

http://www.bbc.com/sport/cricket/42729182
 
Ben Stokes’s England return will be delayed once again after it was announced on Thursday morning that his first court date clashes with the start of the Twenty20 series in New Zealand.

The story took another twist when it was announced Stokes and two other men, Ryan Hale and Ryan Ali, have been called to appear at Bristol Magistrates Court on Feb 13 to answer charges of affray following an incident in Bristol in the early hours of Sept 25.

England are due to play New Zealand in Wellington on Feb 13, the first game that Stokes was available for selection.

Now his return will be delayed, probably until the start of the ODI series in Hamilton on Feb 25. It is just another twist in a case that has cast a long shadow over England’s winter.

Just when coach Trevor Bayliss thought he could call on Stokes, he will now have to wait a little longer.

Stokes was on Wednesday cleared to play international cricket again by the England & Wales Cricket Board, however, his comeback date was always subject to his legal position.

Stokes has indicated he will plead not guilty after releasing a statement this week vowing to clear his name. Affray can be heard at magistrates court but if he pleads not guilty it is more likely it will be heard at crown court, delaying the process significantly.

England are preparing to welcome him back with “open arms” whenever that will be after learning on Wednesday that his international suspension had been lifted by the ECB’s executive board. The board met over the course of several teleconference calls earlier this week after the Crown Prosecution Service announced it was charging Stokes with affray.

Trevor Bayliss, the England coach, was keen for Stokes to return and knows how important he is to the team. Speaking in Brisbane this morning as the team prepared for tomorrow’s second ODI at the Gabba against Australia, Bayliss said Stokes will easily return to the team environment.

“Happy he's been made available, players and coaches are looking forward to seeing him,” said Bayliss in Brisbane on Thursday morning.

“He's raring to go, he's a cricketer first and foremost and he just wants to be out on the field playing. He understands the reasons why he hasn't been playing, same as the team and management, but he's looking forward to getting back on the park.

“They (other players) are looking forward to seeing him, he's a very popular member of the team and the squad. I'm sure they'll welcome him back with open arms.

"It was certainly something we'd much rather not have to deal with. But all credit to the players, once the game came around they were fully focused on playing. I've got admiration for those guys that they were able to see past that and get on the with the cricket.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket/...return-delayed-court-date-clashes-t20-series/
 
Thought he would be cleared to play when he was cleared of all charges or when the case is over is and he knows his punishment.

Shows Englands desperation.
 
England cricketer Ben Stokes has pleaded not guilty after being accused of fighting outside a Bristol nightclub in September.

The 26-year-old Durham all-rounder is charged with affray after a man allegedly suffered a broken eye socket.

At Bristol Crown Court on Monday, Mr Stokes denied the charges via video link from New Zealand where he is on duty with the England squad.

Mr Stokes is accused jointly with Ryan Hale and Ryan Aslam Ali.

Mr Hale, 26, and 28-year-old Mr Ali, both from Bristol, also deny the same charge of affray.

The trial date has been set for 6 August and the three defendants were granted unconditional bail.

Mr Stokes, Mr Hale and Mr Ali were detained early on 25 September following a disturbance in the Clifton Triangle area of the city - several hours after England had played a one-day international against the West Indies.

As a result of the charge, Mr Stokes missed the Ashes series, which hosts Australia won 4-0, although he was allowed to play some domestic matches in New Zealand.

England declared him available once more after he indicated a plea of not guilty at Bristol Magistrates' Court in February.

England are due to play the first test match of a five-game series against India at Edgbaston Cricket Ground in Birmingham between 1-5 August, with Mr Stokes's trial due to start a day later.

The trial is expected to last between five and seven days, which means there is a risk Mr Stokes could miss the second test which starts at Lord's Cricket Ground on 9 August.

The England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) said: "We fully respect the legal process and the player's right to defend himself against the charge."

In January the ECB said that, "given the potential length of time to trial", it would not be "fair, reasonable or proportionate for Ben Stokes to remain unavailable for a further indeterminate period".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-43370325
 
We welcome back this violent criminal with open arms, just make sure you don't rustle a couple of weak men at the ECB Loughborough HQ; now that will end your career!
 
Ben Stokes to possibly miss Lord's Test series against India because of affray charges

England all-rounder Ben Stokes on Monday pleaded not guilty via video link to a charge of affray over a nightclub incident that forced him out of the Ashes tour. The powerful all-rounder, currently with the England squad in New Zealand, looks set to miss the second Test against India at Lord's, with his trial set for August 6. The trial is expected to last between five and seven days, coinciding with the Lord's Test which begins on August 9. Stokes and two other men pleaded not guilty to the charge during a 15-minute hearing at Bristol Crown Court, in the southwest of England.

Stokes, 26, wearing a grey shirt, said "hi judge" when he was introduced to Judge Peter Blair via the video link. The two other defendants, Ryan Ali, 28, and Ryan Hale, 26, appeared in person at the court.

"You must be here without fail for that trial," the judge told Stokes, Ali and Hale. "You will remain on bail as before."

Stokes missed the Ashes tour after being suspended from playing for England. Without him, the tourists lost to Australia 4-0.

England declared Stokes available again after he pleaded not guilty at Bristol Magistrates Court last month and he flew to New Zealand to join the squad after the court hearing.

Stokes, Ali and Hale are jointly charged with affray in Bristol on September 25 last year - several hours after England had played a One-day International against the West Indies.
It is alleged a 27-year-old man suffered a fractured eye socket in the incident, at which fellow England cricketer Alex Hales was also present. Hales faced no charges.

The charge states that their "conduct was such as would cause a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to fear for his personal safety".

Stokes featured in all five of England's one-day internationals in New Zealand, with the tourists winning the series 3-2.

England now have a two-Test series against New Zealand, which starts on March 22.
Stokes is due to play in the Indian Premier League after being sold for 1.4 million British Pounds (1.9 million US dollars) to the Rajasthan Royals.
https://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/ben...t-lords-with-affray-trial-on-august-6-1822894

Atm he is set to miss the first Test as the court hearings will be during that time period

However with an active court case going on it is possible he may miss the entire series. :stokes :bhajji
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well. that means he definitely misses the series against Pakistan. Good.
 
I will prefer if Anderson misses the series

This.

Stokes will be a loss. But not to an extent that decides the series.

Anderson will be the key. If he can swing the ball at pace like he did when India toured the last time, India will be in trouble again.
 
Only weather can save us from a 3 or 4-0 trouncing, Stokes or no Stokes.
 
This.

Stokes will be a loss. But not to an extent that decides the series.

Anderson will be the key. If he can swing the ball at pace like he did when India toured the last time, India will be in trouble again.

Anderson is getting old though, not sure how much longer he'll be playing for.

The venues suit Indian batsmen - Lord's is a slow pitch, The Oval suits sub-continental teams strengths (flat, decent carry so good value for batsmen's shots and conducive to reverse swing/spin) and Rose Bowl which is a flat, boring phatta.

Edgbaston and Trent Bridge are very difficult for touring teams as England have a strong record there and are the most seam/swing-friendly conditions. Or maybe you guys would prefer spicy pitches as it'd bring your seamers into it and English top order is weak at the moment.
 
Only weather can prevent an Indian series win, Stokes or no Stokes.

I guess those doubting the Indian team never watched what the Indian pacers did to the SA batsmen in the third Test.
 
India isn’t winning in England until at least Cook, Anderson and Broad retire, and Root and Stokes take a break.
 
India isn’t winning in England until at least Cook, Anderson and Broad retire, and Root and Stokes take a break.

I am praying that Cook plays all 5 of the tests against India - he's a weakness waiting to be exploited - except on the odd flat track that we will get out of the 5 tests.

Anderson is still good, but he's getting older and older - will have his moments, but will not be able to be a major factor in this series. Unless the Indian batsmen are not able to bat time, which I don't think will be the case.

Broad is also no spring chicken, and if he can get past his foot injury problems, he will be a bigger threat than Clouderson, who is incredibly good in his conditions, but is simply getting old, and fast.
 
And they also saw what SA bowlers did to Indian batsmen.

Yeah, we need to fix out batting and not do stupid things like dropping BK. Bowling is better than ever and should not be a problem. Anyway, bad as Indian batting may be, English batting is much worse.
 
So Ben Stokes will probably miss the second test match against India.His trial is set to start on the 6th of August,3 days before the 2nd test starts.
 
So Ben Stokes will probably miss the second test match against India.His trial is set to start on the 6th of August,3 days before the 2nd test starts.

Wow he will be missed by England.
 
How many people are excited for Ben Stokes imminent Conviction ? JUSTICE ! will be served

He will be missing the 2nd Test because proceedings shall begin, I for one can't be more excited ! almost like Eid and Christmas are coming at the same time !

I can't stand him, he is a petulant child who has been protected and persisted with overly by a very hypocritical set up and we should all relish his guilty verdict and permanent ban in the future hopefully.

Cricket is a gentleman's game and the standards for your behaviour as a representative of the National England Cricket Team should be very very high. Ben Stokes is a poor ambassador for England and the sport of cricket in general, quiet frankly we could do without him.

He has taken his position for granted and is hardly the sharpest tool in the box, he deserves to be punished severely because he never learns from his mistakes. If god forbid he is able to resume his career as an international, it will only get worse given how he believes himself to be invincible and is treated as such by his baby sitters.
 
Will this Help India. I have a feeling that India might take advantage of this. Stokes a match winner with the bowl especially if the conditions are dry. He could have hurt India in lords where the wicket is dry.
 
He will be missing the 2nd Test because proceedings shall begin, I for one can't be more excited ! almost like Eid and Christmas are coming at the same time !

I can't stand him, he is a petulant child who has been protected and persisted with overly by a very hypocritical set up and we should all relish his guilty verdict and permanent ban in the future hopefully.

Cricket is a gentleman's game and the standards for your behaviour as a representative of the National England Cricket Team should be very very high. Ben Stokes is a poor ambassador for England and the sport of cricket in general, quiet frankly we could do without him.

He has taken his position for granted and is hardly the sharpest tool in the box, he deserves to be punished severely because he never learns from his mistakes. If god forbid he is able to resume his career as an international, it will only get worse given how he believes himself to be invincible and is treated as such by his baby sitters.

If found guilty, it will be a first offence so I think he will get a community sentence.
 
If found guilty, it will be a first offence so I think he will get a community sentence.

Yeah, I've been reading more and more into this and you may well be correct. I can't see it being a prison sentence of any kind but more so a community service. He has a few good witnesses too, including those he was protecting/shielding.
 
Cricketer Ben Stokes ‘lost control’ during fight outside club, court told

England cricketer Ben Stokes “lost control” and knocked two men unconscious in an alleged fight outside a nightclub in Bristol after drinking, a court has heard.

The 27-year-old all-rounder is accused of punching Ryan Hale, 27, to the ground and then “after a time to pause for thought” allegedly knocked out Ryan Ali, 28.

Stokes, Hale and Ali are jointly accused of affray – a charge they all deny – and are on trial at Bristol Crown Court.

Prosecutor Nicholas Corsellis said an altercation took place in the Clifton Triangle area of the city on September 25 2017 shortly after 2am after the three defendants had all left the Mbargo nightclub having all been drinking.

He told the jury of six men and six women: “In the early hours of the morning of Monday September 25 2017, a fight took place between these three defendants in central Bristol in the area known as the Clifton Triangle.

“They were, the Crown say, all involved in threatening and/or using unlawful violence towards each other. Some participated to a greater extent than others as you will see.”

Mr Corsellis told the court that all the defendants had been drinking that night and had been at the Mbargo nightclub, with the alleged incident taking place after the club closed after 2am.

“How precisely it started is only known by the defendants. The violence that erupted could actually have stopped very quickly and it would have remained a relatively minor incident,” Mr Corsellis said.

“But during the incident Mr Stokes lost his control and started to attack with revenge, retaliation or punishment in mind. Well beyond acting in self defence or defence of another.

“He knocked Mr Hale unconscious and then – after time to pause for thought, to calm – he did exactly the same to Mr Ali.

“Mr Ali received significant injuries, including a fractured eye socket, and required hospital treatment.”

Mr Corsellis added: “This was not a trivial moment of unpleasantness. It was a sustained episode of significant violence that left onlookers shocked at what was taking place.

“A bottle was used at the beginning by Mr Ali and a broken street sign brought into the fray towards the end by Mr Hale.

“It is with regret that these defendants are before you, for they are all young men of promise.

“The defendant, Ben Stokes, is a professional cricket player who has reached the top of his profession and represented his country.

“Equally, Mr Ali has worked for the emergency services and Mr Hale has served his country in the armed forces.

“It almost goes without saying, but past success, fame or good deeds does not absolve you from your duty – and the law – to behave yourself. The law and court favour no person and all are to be judged equally.”

Wearing a blue suit and red tie, Stokes was driven to the city’s Crown Court in a silver people carrier and walked straight into the building flanked by the media.

Trial judge Judge Peter Blair QC, the Recorder of Bristol, had asked 16 potential jurors whether they were “extremely committed” cricket fans following either the England or India teams.

The potential panel were also asked whether they knew any of the three defendants and a number of other people who could be called to give evidence in the trial.

This includes Stokes’s teammate Alex Hales, William O’Connor and Kai Barry, nightclub doorman Andrew Cunningham, Clifton Triangle residents Maximilian Wilson, Lauren Sweeney and Jess Thomas, and police officers.

Stokes missed the Ashes after being suspended from playing for England.

Without him, England lost the series against Australia 4-0.

He has since played in the Test series against New Zealand, Pakistan and last week starred as England beat India at Edgbaston.

Stokes, of Stockton Road, Castle Eden, Durham; Ali, of Forest Road, Bristol; and Hale, of Burghill Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, are on bail.

http://www.itv.com/news/2018-08-06/...control-during-fight-outside-club-court-told/
 
Cricketer Ben Stokes 'mocked gay couple' before nightclub fight, jury hears

The cricketer Ben Stokes mocked two gay men, “mimicking their voices and mannerisms in a derogatory manner”, in an exchange captured on CCTV, Bristol crown court has heard.

A jury of seven men and five women was shown footage which the prosecution said depicted the Durham and England cricket star mocking the couple, Kai Barry and William O’Connor, and flicking the stub of a lit cigarette towards O’Connor’s head.

Stokes denies a charge of affray relating to a fight later in the evening which left another man with a broken left eye socket.

The prosecutor Nicholas Corsellis said that the incident, for which the firefighter Ryan Ali and the former serviceman Ryan Hale have also been charged with affray, was “not a moment of trivial unpleasantness, but a sustained episode of violence which left onlookers shocked”. Ali and Hale have also denied the charges.

Bristol crown court heard on Monday that Stokes “lost his control” and acted way beyond the realms of self defence during a fight outside Mbargo nightclub in the early hours of Monday 25 September last year. Stokes had attended the nightclub together with the England captain Joe Root and teammates Alex Hales and Jonny Bairstow after England’s ODI victory over the West Indies earlier in the day.

Stokes and Hales left the nightclub at about 12.45am but returned to Mbargo at 2.08am. The jury heard that they were refused entry and that Stokes attempted to bribe his way into the nightclub by offering the bouncer £60 and then £300.

The jury heard that Stokes then insulted the doorman Andrew Cunningham, telling him: “Look at the state of your teeth” – in reference to his two gold front teeth – “They make you look like a ****.”

Stokes arrived at Bristol crown court just before 9am and was greeted by a throng of photographers. There were eight police officers guarding the gate as he exited a silver people carrier with blacked out windows in front of his wife, Clare Ratcliffe, with whom he has two young children, and his agent Neil Fairbrother.

The all-rounder played a decisive role in England’s narrow Test victory over India at Edgbaston last week. The 27-year-old helped bowl England to a tense 31-run win, taking the key wicket of India’s star batsman Virat Kohli. Stokes celebrated his match-changing role at Edgbaston, which has been compared to some of the great pivotal moments in Test history, with a roar and a double fist pump in front of a 25,000 crowd.

But by 10.30am on Monday, just three days later, the former England vice-captain sat glumly in the dock of courtroom number one. He changed his position from staring intently to sitting with crossed arms as the jury was told he had made a v-sign towards Cunningham after he was refused entry to the nightclub.

Stokes, from Castle Eden, Durham; Ali, from Bristol; and Hale, from Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, are on bail.

The case, which is expected to last up to seven days, continues.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...-gay-couple-before-nightclub-fight-jury-hears
 
Mocked Katie Price's disabled son at pre drinks, then mocks a gay couple later on in the night, but we were told he was fighting to protect a gay person(s) at the end of the night.

I'm confused....
 
Mocked Katie Price's disabled son at pre drinks, then mocks a gay couple later on in the night, but we were told he was fighting to protect a gay person(s) at the end of the night.

I'm confused....

The incident over Katie Prices son was completely separate, it's just the footage got released shortly after the Bristol incident. The claims that he mocked a gay couple have come from a bouncer (who he had just insulted) and are presumably contradicted by the gay couple in question called him a real hero.
 
Last edited:
The incident over Katie Prices son was completely separate, it's just the footage got released shortly after the Bristol incident. The claims that he mocked a gay couple have come from a bouncer (who he had just insulted) and are presumably contradicted by the gay couple in question called him a real hero.

The claims of the bouncer and the gay couple would not necessarily be contradictory. It is conceivable that Stokes was looking to pick a fight with anyone he could. It is therefore possible that he first insulted the bouncer and the couple and, later in the night, saw the other two defendants and decided to physically attack them too. That may have had the unintended effect of rescuing the gay couple (who then saw him as a hero despite his earlier behaviour) but it was not Stokes's main motivation.
 
This trial doesn’t sound like it is going particularly great for him. As this is a first offence perhaps he will not go to jail, but it sounds like there is a definite chance of a conviction.
 
Ben Stokes mocked by two gay men for his gold-encrusted shoes moments before he knocked out two clubbers, court hears

Ben Stokes was mocked by two gay men for his gold encrusted shoes moments before he knocked out two clubbers, a court heard.

A jury at the 27-year-old's trial for affray was taken through footage of his white trainers being pointed at by Kai Barry and William O'Connor, who Stokes is accused of having mocked for being "flamboyant" and "camp".

Gordon Cole QC, representing Stokes, asked doorman Andrew Cunningham, a key witness, whether Mr O'Connor and Mr Barry were laughing and joking about his client's shoes.

Referring to the CCTV footage, Mr Cole said: "They are pointing down towards Mr Stokes's shoes. Did you hear any conversation about shoes and Mr Stokes's shoes having gold locks on the back of them?"

Mr Cunningham said he did not, but the jury is still waiting to hear Stokes' full version of events.

The cricketer is accused of knocking out his fellow defendants Ryan Hale and Ryan Ali, who he claimed had been homophobic towards Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor.

Jurors at Bristol Crown Court was taken through video footage in forensic detail. CCTV also shows Stokes and England teammate Alex Hales - who had been refused re-entry - waving at the club's security cameras before tempers flared.

Andrew Cunningham, 37, in charge of door duties at Mbargo on Bristol's Clifton Triangle, described Stokes as "spiteful" and a "bully" for picking on Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor, describing them as "two little guys".

Stokes, Mr Hales, Mr Barry and Mr Ali were outside the club after 2am before Ali and Hale walked out.

The doorman said he could see "no friction" between Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor as they walked away from the scene with Ryan Hale and Ryan Ali. But moments later, a fight ensued.

The court heart how two bottles were involved in the incident - one was held by Ali, and further footage showed Hale with another. Both Stokes and Mr Hales were unarmed.

Mr Cunningham, who is bald, with tattoos on his face and gold teeth, said Stokes initially singled out Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor because they were "a bit more demonstrative... flamboyant".

He told jurors: "The ginger guy picked up on this, he started to mimick their actions. He didn't actually speak, he made noises to sound like them.

"He was making stupid sounds and camp hand gestures."

Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor were "not impressed" when Stokes mocked them, but the pair "waited at the side for two other lads to come out", Mr Cunningham said.

"When he flicked the cigarette at him, that's when I interevened. I said if you want to start something start on me.... they hadn't done anything wrong. They were only little guys.

"When I said that, his friend (England teammate Alex Hales) looked confused, and he turned round to his friend and said 'Stokesy, don't do that'."

The doorman, who also has tattoos on his neck and hands, said Stokes and Hales had repeatedly asked to get back in after showing up after closing time.

Key allegations from yesterday's proceedings
  • Stokes verbally abused doorman after refusing entry
  • Stokes "mocked" gay men Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor
  • England cricketer accused of flicking cigarette at them
  • Ali and Hale left the club and started talking to gay men
  • Mr Barry appeared to touch Ali's groin inappropriately
  • Armed with a bottle, Ali made contact with Mr Barry
  • Stokes then charged at Ali, knocking him out
  • Hale "armed himself" with metal pole and was punched by Stokes

Last entry was 2am and "once they leave they cannot re-enter.... it's part of our licence," Mr Cunningham told the court.

"If we let people in after those hours we lose our jobs," he added.

He told the court he did not like cricket, adding, of Stokes and Hales, that "I didn't know they were famous".

"The ginger one offere me 60 pound. I said it wouldn't get him in. Then he asked his friend, and they offered me £300.

"I said no, I wouldn't have a job to go back to in the morning. Stokes got angry at this, he claimed.

"First of all he mentioned he mentioned my teeth...I have gold teeth. Then he told me I looked like a c***... then he mentioned my tattoos, how s*** they are.

"I said 'thank you'... it doesn't matter. I don't rise to it. I'm quite thick skinned like that."

Mr Cunningham added: "He had quite a spiteful tongue, quite and angry tongue."

Stokes and other England internationals had been drinking in Mbargo earlier. "They were as good as gold," he said of the players' initial behaviour.

Mr Cunningham said he had met Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor on several ocassions over the years as they had frequented clubs he had work at in the Park Street area.

When Mr O'Connor and Mr Barry eventually walked away from the club with Ryan Ali and Ryan Hale " they just chatted outside and there was no friction between them", Mr Cunningham claimed.

Mr Cunningham had refused to shake Stokes' hand before he left shortly later with Hales. He said: "He shook my buddy's hand. He then went to shake mine. I had no reason to shake his hand."

Cross-examined by Stokes' defence lawyer Mr Cole, it was suggested that it was Mr Cunningham being "aggressive", and that Stokes, Mr Hales, Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor were seen laughing and joking together in "banter" outside the club.

Mr Cunningham did not agree with the assessment. Stephen Mooney, representing Ali, asked the doorman whether Stokes and Mr Hales treated him with "respect and courtesy".

He said they did not. When asked whether Stokes had clearly been drinking, Mr Cunningham told the court: "Not excessively, no. He didn't seem drunk."

Yesterday the jury was told how the sports star mocked a gay man and flicked a cigarette butt at his head before knocking two men unconscious in a fight near a nightclub in Bristol.

Stephen Mooney, representing Ryan Ali, asked Detective Constable Daniel Adams, who led the case, whether there was anything that could explain why Stokes had flicked a cigarette butt at Mr O'Connor.

Det Con Adams replied: "No." Mr Mooney asked: "Would you describe that action as joking?" Det Con Adams said: "No."

Stokes, 27, is accused of punching Ryan Hale, 27, to the ground and then allegedly knocking out Ryan Ali, 28, a short time later during the fracas.

While outside, Stokes started speaking with Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor, and shortly after at 2.23am, the prosecution say Ali and Hale are seen on CCTV leaving the nightclub and walking off with Mr Barry and Mr O'Connor after the four men had started chatting.

The footage allegedly shows Stokes and Mr Hales catch up with the group, and Mr Barry appeared to touch Ali inappropriately on his groin, before returning and trying to take his arm.

Ali pushed Mr Barry away "with no significant force" before Stokes "charged" over to the group, Mr Corsellis said.

The jury heard only the defendants know how the alleged fight started but Ali raised a bottle as if to hit Mr Hales, instead making "glancing contact" with Mr Barry's shoulder.

Stokes then threw a punch at Ali, with both men falling to the ground. Mr Corsellis said all of those present, except for Stokes, then wanted the situation to stop - with Mr Hales telling him "Stokes, Stokes, that's enough".

Hale pulling a metal pole from a street sign before running back to the group, an eye witness said.

The incident was also witnessed by off-duty special constable Mark Spure.

Doctors diagnosed Ali with a fracture to the left of his face, a swollen left eye and a laceration above his eyebrow. He also had a cracked lower left molar.

Hale sustained a 1.5 inch superficial laceration and bruising to his forehead, consistent with blunt force trauma.

"Mr Stokes had no obvious injuries save for an area of swelling over the metacarpals on his right hand," Mr Corsellis added.

The Durham cricketer was arrested at the scene and the officers' body-worn footage captures Hale saying that he did not wish to press charges as Stokes "ain't done anything to me".

"The footage also captures Mr Hales stating that he was not present during the incident, contrary to the CCTV footage," Mr Corsellis said.

"When being told by the officers the reason for his arrest, Stokes said that he had acted in the way that he did: 'Because he was abusing my two friends for being gay'."

He claimed he saw Ali and Hale speaking to the two gay men in a "harsh and abusive" way that was homophobic in nature, and denied being abusive or flicking a cigarette.

Prosecutors allege that Stokes was not acting in self-defence, but with "revenge, retaliation or punishment in mind".

Stokes, of Stockton Road, Castle Eden, Durham; Ali, of Forest Road, Bristol; and Hale, of Burghill Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, each deny a joint charge of affray.

The trial continues.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...-cricketer-arrives-court-day-two-affray-case/
 
This trial doesn’t sound like it is going particularly great for him. As this is a first offence perhaps he will not go to jail, but it sounds like there is a definite chance of a conviction.

Do we know it would be his first offence? Even if it is, I reckon he deserves a jail sentence for it.

I thought yesterday that maybe the testimony of the two gay men would be decisive. But now I am not sure it would be important at all (assuming they give evidence). It is clear from every bit of objective evidence that Stokes is guilty of affray, should have been charged with assault and is lucky not to be standing trial for murder.
 
The whole situation is contradictory. He supposedly mocked/insulted a gay couple, then in the same night helped/protected them/some other couple?

Something doesn't add up :-/
 
Last edited:
The claims of the bouncer and the gay couple would not necessarily be contradictory. It is conceivable that Stokes was looking to pick a fight with anyone he could. It is therefore possible that he first insulted the bouncer and the couple and, later in the night, saw the other two defendants and decided to physically attack them too. That may have had the unintended effect of rescuing the gay couple (who then saw him as a hero despite his earlier behaviour) but it was not Stokes's main motivation.

A fair point, but with the bouncer being the sole witness to these insults/mockery Stokes's chances have probably been aided by bouncer making a few statements today that would potentially make the jury view him as an unreliable witness.
 
Do we know it would be his first offence? Even if it is, I reckon he deserves a jail sentence for it.

I thought yesterday that maybe the testimony of the two gay men would be decisive. But now I am not sure it would be important at all (assuming they give evidence). It is clear from every bit of objective evidence that Stokes is guilty of affray, should have been charged with assault and is lucky not to be standing trial for murder.

Nobody was killed so it's can be murder. However if he has broken eye socket, it's ABH or even GBH which is a very serious offence. Affray also carries a custodial sentence.

I can't see him being found not guilty after the evidence submitted so far. He could have also escaped jail by pleading guilty but by pleading non-guilty, he could very well see himself locked up for a 6 months to a year.
 
I'll be shocked if he's jailed. Btw, this was the prosecution first up and I expect some balance when his defence is called upon. It's sounds bad as per, but it's only the start.
 
I'll be shocked if he's jailed. Btw, this was the prosecution first up and I expect some balance when his defence is called upon. It's sounds bad as per, but it's only the start.

You have the door security, police and other eye witnesses making a strong case not to mention the video evidence. He could have Johnnie Cochran as his defence lawyer but even he wont be able to get away from the evidence.
 
The witness today said Benstokes and Alex Hales were like football holligans.........Stokes reputation preceeds him, it might be a seperate incident but making fun of Katie Price's son who is disabled is the lowest of the low, he deserves to be convicted and dont have any respect for him at all now.
 
You have the door security, police and other eye witnesses making a strong case not to mention the video evidence. He could have Johnnie Cochran as his defence lawyer but even he wont be able to get away from the evidence.

The security guard could be seen as having an issue beforehand with Stokes so that may not be a big indicator either way.

The Police [I don't know what exactly they stated barring he was too drunk and rowdy]

He also has witnesses that state he was only helping the couple that were being harassed.
 
The security guard could be seen as having an issue beforehand with Stokes so that may not be a big indicator either way.

The Police [I don't know what exactly they stated barring he was too drunk and rowdy]

He also has witnesses that state he was only helping the couple that were being harassed.

Btw, me stating he was drunk and rowdy is just me thinking out loud. I don't know what the Constable present thought of Stokes' behaviour.
 
The amateur video footage from the third floor shows that he beat two young men unconscious.

Yes, one of the two men - now his fellow defendants - had improvised a weapon.

But Stokes has been charged with the lower crime of affray rather than Grievous Bodily Harm because apparently there is no need to prove intent - just that he threw the punches.

So a conviction seems overwhelmingly likely.

Which means that India look likely to face England Minus Stokes for the rest of the summer followed by Australia Minus Smith and Warner.
 
You have the door security, police and other eye witnesses making a strong case not to mention the video evidence. He could have Johnnie Cochran as his defence lawyer but even he wont be able to get away from the evidence.

Not even if he used the Chewbacca Defence?
 
The amateur video footage from the third floor shows that he beat two young men unconscious.

Yes, one of the two men - now his fellow defendants - had improvised a weapon.

But Stokes has been charged with the lower crime of affray rather than Grievous Bodily Harm because apparently there is no need to prove intent - just that he threw the punches.

So a conviction seems overwhelmingly likely.

Which means that India look likely to face England Minus Stokes for the rest of the summer followed by Australia Minus Smith and Warner.

India is also playing without Bhuvi and Bumrah, so its not a big deal if Stokes misses out. Also remember, Eng playing at home...so 1 player wont make much difference. If the series in India...I would back us to beat Poms even without Kohli.

Yes, Smith and Warner will be a big loss for Aust. But remember, last time even against full Aust side we drawn 2 tests there, almost won the Adelaide game. So I would expect a series win this time around. Even if not series win, we will atleast perform at a level where likes of Ian Chappel wont be able to mock us like he did when a certain other Asian team toured Aust.
 
But Stokes has been charged with the lower crime of affray rather than Grievous Bodily Harm because apparently there is no need to prove intent - just that he threw the punches.

So a conviction seems overwhelmingly likely.

Wonder why he pleaded Not Guilty?

Might get a suspended sentence. So he could carry on playing for England at home, depending on the terms of his contract, but touring might prove to be a problem.
 
India is also playing without Bhuvi and Bumrah, so its not a big deal if Stokes misses out. Also remember, Eng playing at home...so 1 player wont make much difference. If the series in India...I would back us to beat Poms even without Kohli.

Yes, Smith and Warner will be a big loss for Aust. But remember, last time even against full Aust side we drawn 2 tests there, almost won the Adelaide game. So I would expect a series win this time around. Even if not series win, we will atleast perform at a level where likes of Ian Chappel wont be able to mock us like he did when a certain other Asian team toured Aust.

Australia have a world class pace attack in their own conditions just like SA and England. Starc / Hazlewood and Cummins and Mitch marsh with back up of chad sayers and James Pattinson are lethal. Plus unlike SA AND ENG , AUS have a world class spinner in Lyon who always troubles India.

As far as batting is concerned yes AUS will struggle but in their home soil you can expect them to still make around 300 minus smith and warner . Matt renshaw joe burns , Khawaja, hands comb and marsh brothers are decent if not class.
 
Australia have a world class pace attack in their own conditions just like SA and England. Starc / Hazlewood and Cummins and Mitch marsh with back up of chad sayers and James Pattinson are lethal. Plus unlike SA AND ENG , AUS have a world class spinner in Lyon who always troubles India.

As far as batting is concerned yes AUS will struggle but in their home soil you can expect them to still make around 300 minus smith and warner . Matt renshaw joe burns , Khawaja, hands comb and marsh brothers are decent if not class.

Regardless to what you say which might be true. India tour of AUS will be their best chance ever to win in Aus. Any team would miss the band duo
 
Ben Stokes trial shown CCTV footage of 'melee outside nightclub'

Jurors have been shown CCTV footage of England cricketer Ben Stokes involved in an alleged "melee" outside a nightclub with two other men.

The Durham all-rounder is one of three men accused of fighting in Bristol on 25 September.

Bristol Crown Court previously heard Ryan Ali, 28, and Ryan Hale, 27, were knocked unconscious by 27-year-old Mr Stokes, who denies affray.

Mr Ali and Mr Hale also deny affray and are on trial alongside the cricketer.

The CCTV footage shows Mr Stokes approaching a retreating Mr Ali, jurors were told.

Mr Hale collapsed to the floor outside a shop window before picking himself up after 20 seconds, disappearing from view and then returning.

Det Con Daniel Adams, the officer in the case, told the court Mr Hale "returns with what appears to be a metal pole with a t-bar on it".

The officer told the jury it was "very difficult to tell" from the footage what Mr Hale was doing with the pole, but he "made his way back towards the melee carrying the bar".

Nicholas Corsellis, prosecuting, asked if he saw Mr Hale "put that implement down before he gets to the group?" Det Con Adams replied: "No."

Mr Stokes, of Castle Eden, Durham, was arrested in the early hours along with Mr Ali, of Bristol, and Mr Hale, of Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol.

The fight took place several hours after England had played a one-day international against West Indies at the city's County Ground.

The trial continues.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-45111213
 
Wonder why he pleaded Not Guilty?

Might get a suspended sentence. So he could carry on playing for England at home, depending on the terms of his contract, but touring might prove to be a problem.

Probably because the 2 people he supposedly attacked didn't want to press charges, and he thought he'd get away with a slap on the wrist?
 
He’s quite lucky just to get away with a charge of affray here. This could easily have been complemented with some variety of ABH charge. Sounds like he has been a complete thug and he is probably going to pay the price for it as well.
 
Probably because the 2 people he supposedly attacked didn't want to press charges, and he thought he'd get away with a slap on the wrist?

What do people mean when they say the victims did not want to "press charges"? I don't think the victim has much say in whether a person is prosecuted or not, although obviously it is more difficult to secure a conviction without the evidence of the victims (although not so much in Stokes's case). The concept of "pressing charges" seems to be an American thing.
 
He’s quite lucky just to get away with a charge of affray here. This could easily have been complemented with some variety of ABH charge. Sounds like he has been a complete thug and he is probably going to pay the price for it as well.

I think we’ve had this discussion before.
Anyway, I really think Stokes needs to be removed from the England set up and have some anger management counselling...

Didn’t he sprain a wrist or damage a knuckle or two in Australia after smashing a wall or something a few years ago?

He clearly has issues
 
What do people mean when they say the victims did not want to "press charges"? I don't think the victim has much say in whether a person is prosecuted or not, although obviously it is more difficult to secure a conviction without the evidence of the victims (although not so much in Stokes's case). The concept of "pressing charges" seems to be an American thing.

What I said wasn't a fact, it was a theory - hence the question mark at the end.

You're right in that it doesn't matter what the victim says or does. It's the prosecution/state that has the final say as to move the case to the court.
 
Ben Stokes 'was main aggressor in nightclub fight'

England cricketer Ben Stokes was the "main aggressor" in a fight outside a nightclub, a court has heard.

The Durham all-rounder is one of three men accused of fighting in Bristol on 25 September.

Bristol Crown Court previously heard Ryan Ali, 28, and Ryan Hale, 27, were knocked unconscious by 27-year-old Mr Stokes, who denies affray.

Mr Ali and Mr Hale have also pleaded not guilty to affray and are on trial alongside the cricketer.

Witness Mark Spure, an off-duty police community support officer (PCSO), said that after he left Mbargo nightclub he spotted "three to five" people involved in a "scuffle" on a nearby street.

In a statement, Mr Spure said he had tried to separate Mr Stokes and Mr Ali, with the others continuing their behaviour behind him.

"The individual seemed to be the main aggressor or was progressing forward trying to get to another individual," he told the court.

"In my statement I describe him as a gentleman with ginger or light brown hair. He had a green t-shirt on."

Mr Ali "seemed to be trying to back away or get away from the situation" before he was punched by Mr Stokes, he added.

Mr Spure told the court he had tried to move Mr Ali out of the road, as there were passing cars, but he was "completely unable to move".

The jury heard he then identified Mr Stokes to police officers, who arrested the cricketer.

Mr Stokes first hit Mr Hale, knocking him to the ground, before rendering Mr Ali unconscious in the punch seen by the PCSO, jurors have been told.

Mr Ali is alleged to have threatened Mr Stokes' England teammate Alex Hales with a bottle during the altercation, while Mr Hale broke off a metal pole from a nearby road sign after being allegedly knocked out by Mr Stokes.


'Squaring up'

The jury heard Mr Ali had suffered a fractured left eye socket, a cracked tooth and cuts and bruises, while Mr Hale suffered bruising and a cut to his forehead.

Footage from a body camera worn by PC Stacey Alway, who arrested Mr Stokes, was shown to the jury.

She told the court the cricketer had been "squaring up" to a group of men at the side of the road as she approached them.

"I didn't know who these males were because I was unable to identify them," PC Alway said.

"From the moment I approached [Mr Stokes] he calmed down and he was completely compliant with me."

The court heard that when PC Alway said to Mr Stokes "a guy over there was covered in blood and I've been told you punched him", he replied "because he was abusing my two friends for being gay".

Nottinghamshire batsman Mr Hales told PC Alway he had not seen the alleged fight, the court was told.

"I came after you guys turned up," he told her.

After Mr Stokes had been put in a police car and PC Alway told Mr Hales to leave, he replied: "I feel bad. He's my best friend. I saw him after everything happened."

Mr Stokes, of Castle Eden, Durham; Mr Ali, of Bristol; and Mr Hale, of Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, all deny a joint charge of affray.

The trial continues.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-45111213
 
I think we’ve had this discussion before.
Anyway, I really think Stokes needs to be removed from the England set up and have some anger management counselling...

Didn’t he sprain a wrist or damage a knuckle or two in Australia after smashing a wall or something a few years ago?

He clearly has issues

I find it difficult to see him being picked for a while after this trial, not saying the door is closed forever because anyone can be given another chance, but definitely 6-12 months out at least.
 
Justice shall be served. I've complete faith in British justice system :ik

That said, it will be a pity if he were to miss the whole series vs India.


Why Stokes why :facepalm: Acting like English youth in Mallorca :facepalm:
 
Back
Top