Suleiman
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2014
- Runs
- 16,945
- Post of the Week
- 2
I know right now Ben Stokes went from being an anti-hero to a full on villain in the majority of cricket circles, but seriously speaking, don't we need a mix of characters in this game? Doesn't it get boring when every Tom, Dick and Ajmal playing cricket is a well behaved boy who doesn't sledge, doesn't get in your face, and is just generally passive?
Cricket to me is like a live action series. You can't have all the characters be protagonists (Kohli, Babar, Amir). You need antagonists (Stokes, Hales, Gayle) as well as filler characters (Amla, Mustafizur).
Of course what he did was absolutely wrong and he deserves whatever repercussions come his way from the law. But people attacking his character that he was always an on field bully need to cool it, because we need a mix of personalities on the cricket field if we want the game to live and breathe for the foreseeable future.
Cricket to me is like a live action series. You can't have all the characters be protagonists (Kohli, Babar, Amir). You need antagonists (Stokes, Hales, Gayle) as well as filler characters (Amla, Mustafizur).
Of course what he did was absolutely wrong and he deserves whatever repercussions come his way from the law. But people attacking his character that he was always an on field bully need to cool it, because we need a mix of personalities on the cricket field if we want the game to live and breathe for the foreseeable future.