What's new

Boris Johnson and Partygate saga

Should Boris Johnson resign as UK Prime Minister?

  • No, he should not

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    12
Question must be asked - why did he wait so long?

Cos he is jumping the band-wagon, and he failed the first time.

The irony is, what you see is what you get with Boris, a buffoon, liar etc, but these ministers who have resigned are the real liars and deceivers!
 
Question must be asked - why did he wait so long?

Final straw breaking the camel's back, I guess. Or he wants to be well clear when the ship sinks.

Fifteen resignations now...
 
Six ministers resign

Five ministers have resigned in a joint letter to the prime minister, and a sixth has sent a separate letter.

This means 27 members of the government have now stepped down.

Among the new resignations are Kemi Badenoch, Julia Lopez, Lee Rowley, Alex Burghart and Neil O'Brien, as well as Mims Davies.

The joint letter says: "It is with great regret that we are resigning as members of the government.

"It has been an honour to serve in your administration and we remain extremely grateful for the opportunity you have given us to serve our country.

"You have had the most difficult task in a generation. We hugely admire your fortitude, stamina and enduring optimism.

"You can be rightly proud of the significant decisions which you have, by common acclamation, got right.

"However, it has become increasingly clear that the government cannot function given the issues that have come to light and the way in which they have been handled.

"In good faith, we must ask that, for the good of the party and the country, you step aside."

lcimg-13d789e6-cb17-462d-bbc4-3b0d4dc273e6.jpg
 
MICHAEL Gove has told Boris Johnson he must go, The Mail+ can reveal.
At a meeting this morning, the Housing Secretary urged the Prime Minister to stand down.
Mr Gove helped Mr Johnson to prepare for Prime Minister’s Questions, but was noticeably absent from the frontbench as he faced MPs at noon.
Sources have told The Mail+ that beforehand the Cabinet minister told Mr Johnson he should quit.
A spokesman for Mr Gove did not dispute this.
It is understood the Housing Secretary is currently working in his Whitehall department and is not planning to lead a wider delegation of ministers to the PM.
Mr Gove famously torpedoed Mr Johnson’s Tory leadership bid following the Brexit referendum in 2016, when he withdrew support for his campaign and launched his own.
Despite a fresh wave of ministerial resignations today, Mr Johnson is defying calls to resign.
 
MICHAEL Gove has told Boris Johnson he must go, The Mail+ can reveal.
At a meeting this morning, the Housing Secretary urged the Prime Minister to stand down.
Mr Gove helped Mr Johnson to prepare for Prime Minister’s Questions, but was noticeably absent from the frontbench as he faced MPs at noon.
Sources have told The Mail+ that beforehand the Cabinet minister told Mr Johnson he should quit.
A spokesman for Mr Gove did not dispute this.
It is understood the Housing Secretary is currently working in his Whitehall department and is not planning to lead a wider delegation of ministers to the PM.
Mr Gove famously torpedoed Mr Johnson’s Tory leadership bid following the Brexit referendum in 2016, when he withdrew support for his campaign and launched his own.
Despite a fresh wave of ministerial resignations today, Mr Johnson is defying calls to resign.

His best mate has passed the silver revolver.

Death blow.
 
These resignation letters are a joke.

"Great honour to serve this government"

"Great leader through exceptionally challenging times"

"Best job ever"

Yet they stab the PM in the back! Proper snakes!
 
What's the issue? He's the most effective leader they have had since Gordon Brown.

Made 10 pledges when he came. All disregarded.
Pushed for second referendum yet has backtracked yesterday on any horrible deals done by Boris


Don't even know what his ideological policies are. Just a PR creation of a random suit with no personality. Only gets traction because he's not as much of a bufoon as Boris. He's just a Tory in a suit.

Boris has been a shambles all year, any opposition leader with nous would have torn Boris apart on a daily basis.

I won't be voting labor till he's in charge. Probably Greens
 
A group of cabinet ministers are about to tell the PM to resign, including the chief whip, the BBC understands.
 
Made 10 pledges when he came. All disregarded.
Pushed for second referendum yet has backtracked yesterday on any horrible deals done by Boris


Don't even know what his ideological policies are. Just a PR creation of a random suit with no personality. Only gets traction because he's not as much of a bufoon as Boris. He's just a Tory in a suit.

Boris has been a shambles all year, any opposition leader with nous would have torn Boris apart on a daily basis.

I won't be voting labor till he's in charge. Probably Greens

That sounds like Corbynistas talk. Everyone who isn’t hard left is a Tory?

A vote for Greens is a vote for the Tories as long as we have FPTP.
 
1922 rules already changed.

35 resignations now.

He’ll be gone in 24 hours.
 
Even if Boris resigns, liberals will find some excuse to discredit a new Tory leader, be it Gove, Mogg, etc.

Labour and LD are not interested in the future of this country, they are just hoping for voting attrition.

Unsurprisingly, LDs and Labour have never been tactical, because the longer Boris is at the helm, the more votes Labour and LD would garner - but no - L/LD want Boris out.
 
If Boris goes, so to the chances of LD and Labour coming into power.

Talk about shooting yourself in the foot, and mouth.
 
Tidal wave of resignations. Sooner than later you run out of people willing to take up government positions.

Hard to sympathise with these ministers however who failed to resist the temptation of ministerial red boxes and joined his cabinet three years ago despite knowing full well Boris's history.

That Liasion Committee hearing just now was bordering on comical. Even the Tory members didn't hide their contempt for Boris, especially the chair Bernard Jenkin.
 
If Boris goes this will only strengthen the Tories position for the next General election. Only in a snap election can labour come in, even though Starmer is a complete liability. Hes the reason why Boris has been allowed to prolong his stay as the PM due his ineptness.
 
Cos he is jumping the band-wagon, and he failed the first time.

The irony is, what you see is what you get with Boris, a buffoon, liar etc, but these ministers who have resigned are the real liars and deceivers!

Whatever their ultimate motives are, there is a tacit admission that Boris' lies and buffoonish behaviour can no longer be tolerated. This happens with any leader who is elected on popularity rather than ability or political nous. When times are good you can get away with it, but when the poop hits the fan - or in this case the economy - then people are less tolerant of clownish dopes with silly haircuts.
 
Whatever their ultimate motives are, there is a tacit admission that Boris' lies and buffoonish behaviour can no longer be tolerated. This happens with any leader who is elected on popularity rather than ability or political nous. When times are good you can get away with it, but when the poop hits the fan - or in this case the economy - then people are less tolerant of clownish dopes with silly haircuts.

Times were good under Thatcher, and Blair, economic booms under their premierships. Were they voted on their economic skills, or political nous?

Though agree, Boris' haircut is a joke.
 
That sounds like Corbynistas talk. Everyone who isn’t hard left is a Tory?

A vote for Greens is a vote for the Tories as long as we have FPTP.

I was 50-50 on Corbyn too

Starmer is just another suit, another Tory masquerading as a Labour.

Tories are losing next election anyway, they don't have anyone to present as a leader after the clown resigns. But I will not be voting Labour until Starmer stays.
 
I have mentioned time and time again, voters do not care who is in power, all they care about is money in their pockets. Blair turned out to be the biggest liar, proven, yet was voted into power 3 times? And to think we have peasants and snake ministers resigning? Why? They knew what Boris was about? I tell you why, the UK economy is in the ****!

Money in the pocket of voters. This is all that matters. The pockets of Tory, Labour, and yes, LD supporters were lined up, as their assets rocketed, no one cared about the lies of Blair and Iraq War, no one cared about the North/South divide under Thatcher, what mattered was money in the pocket. And when people do not have money in their pocket, what happens? Austerity, and what does austerity breed? Fascism. Weimar/NAZI Germany.

Since the crash of 2008, UK has suffered at the hands of the cancerous coalition, Tory + LD, then austerity lead the charge towards Brexit, Tory's had a slim majority by 2015, Brexit happened, Cameron bailed, since then its been back and forth, 3 GEs in 5 years.

Austerity and consequentially prosperity, is all that matters when it comes to voters. No one cares about hair cuts, of ideals, of track records, or speeches, or morals, or dignity, or integrity. Money in the pocket, you do not care who is in power, which is why Thatcher and Blair are the 2 longest serving PMs in UK history.

Thatcher and Blair ushered in prosperity, by promoting debt. There was no magic wand for economics, at best, embracing Reaganomics, debt. For which now we are paying the price.

So, to hell with the Labour supporters, to hell with the Liberal warmongering hypocrites, to hell with Remainers, Boris is like any other politician, the only difference is, the UK economy has suffered under his tenure, and like snakes, those who supported him, are now stabbing him in the back.
 
If Boris goes this will only strengthen the Tories position for the next General election. Only in a snap election can labour come in, even though Starmer is a complete liability. Hes the reason why Boris has been allowed to prolong his stay as the PM due his ineptness.

100% agree on Starmer

Starmer has been completely MIA and anonymous. With the amount of scandals Boris and the Tories have had, any even semi decent opposition would have buried the Tories.

Guy has no ideological policies, no personality. Nothing man
 
<b>Patel calls on Johnson to resign</b>

The BBC's Chris Mason says he's been told that Home Secretary Priti Patel, one of Boris Johnson’s closest senior allies, has told the prime minister he should resign.
 
<b>PM 'absolutely defiant' and won't resign - report</b>

The ITV deputy political editor says she has been told the PM is "absolutely defiant and is not going to resign".

"Sources tell me he told Cabinet colleagues that it was a choice between summer focused on economic growth or chaos of a leadership contest - followed by massive pressure for a general election," she writes.

Says she's been told the PM put his 14 million votes at the last general election on the table - and that those around him "think they will lose a couple more from cabinet but not all".

BBC/ITV
 
Man Parliamentary democracy is such a joke lol.. and majority of the world took this system.

US system might be terrible too but way better than this.
 
Not a single one of these resignations has triggered a bi-election. All these snakes have done is resign from a ministerial position bestowed by Boris.

Poisonous snakes.
 
100% agree on Starmer

Starmer has been completely MIA and anonymous. With the amount of scandals Boris and the Tories have had, any even semi decent opposition would have buried the Tories.

Guy has no ideological policies, no personality. Nothing man

When your enemy is making mistakes, let him carry on - Sun Tsu said that.

Starmer is boring but ok in my book. A council house kid who because a barrister and has given thirty years to public service.
 
When your enemy is making mistakes, let him carry on - Sun Tsu said that.

Starmer is boring but ok in my book. A council house kid who because a barrister and has given thirty years to public service.

UK is gutted and on its knees. It was on its knees when May went too but the public still voted Tories because of bad leadership.

There is no time to 'let him carry on' especially with now more than a decade long Tory government, who keep getting voted in, due to poor opposition. The time was to hammer them daily.

He's been a total joke I am sorry.
 
Fun fact. Starmer was pivotal in the Stephen Lawrence case, yes a racist murder case, which is how and why Starmer was gifted the title, Sir.

Look it up.

Starmer is no politician.
 
Whatever their ultimate motives are, there is a tacit admission that Boris' lies and buffoonish behaviour can no longer be tolerated. This happens with any leader who is elected on popularity rather than ability or political nous. When times are good you can get away with it, but when the poop hits the fan - or in this case the economy - then people are less tolerant of clownish dopes with silly haircuts.

This.

He burned his political capital with Partygate - people got sick of being lied and lied and lied to. He has been exposed as having bad judgement, making lazy decisions because he doesn’t do detail.

The guy doesn’t stand for anything, except his own ambition.

Utterly unsuited to high office, and the worst PM of my lifetime by a very long way.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Another senior Cabinet minister not going, and also not true that Brandon Lewis going. But many of them do think Boris Johnson can definitely not survive this. <a href="https://t.co/iGUWk10W3Q">https://t.co/iGUWk10W3Q</a></p>— Anushka Asthana (@AnushkaAsthana) <a href="https://twitter.com/AnushkaAsthana/status/1544767753579626496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 6, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Downing st sources saying the pm will fight a confidence vote. But also very clear that if he were to lose that vote- he would then go.</p>— Anushka Asthana (@AnushkaAsthana) <a href="https://twitter.com/AnushkaAsthana/status/1544758504937984000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 6, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Another vote maybe lol
 
Last edited:
After the Nazis in HoP changed the rules!

Funny how liberals are supporting this undemocratic action. Then again not funny considering Liberalism is fascism.

What’s the difference though.. Boris will go
some other white leader will take over, has there been any real difference in last 30-40 years irrespective of elections power change in the trajectory of current England’s economy/laws?
 
What’s the difference though.. Boris will go
some other white leader will take over, has there been any real difference in last 30-40 years irrespective of elections power change in the trajectory?

No difference other than the trajectory of economic prosperity vs austerity.

UK would vote a monkey into power into power if it meant money in the pockets of voters.
 
UK is gutted and on its knees. It was on its knees when May went too but the public still voted Tories because of bad leadership.

There is no time to 'let him carry on' especially with now more than a decade long Tory government, who keep getting voted in, due to poor opposition. The time was to hammer them daily.

He's been a total joke I am sorry.

Consider the extremely awkward position he is in. He’s had to turn the Party’s focus inwards, to clear out the far left / antisemites. It’s not clear who Labour stand for these days. The blue collar switched to Tory because of identitarianism / Brexit / Corbyn’s perceived lack of patriotism. Starmer has to keep quiet on Brexit to win the Red Wall back and have a chance of gaining power.

I think they would be in a better place under Wes Streeting or Andy Burnham but it’s not their time.
 
No difference other than the trajectory of economic prosperity vs austerity.

UK would vote a monkey into power into power if it meant money in the pockets of voters.

I guess I can understand the frustration then, South Asia for years voted for “subsidies”.. most parts of India still do for such state governments.
 
Brandon Lewis, I'm told, heckled by a fellow passenger on a flight from Belfast to London tonight. The passenger told him: "You are complicit in the betrayal of this country by Boris Johnson."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Home Secretary Priti Patel has turned on Boris & is now demanding he must go
 
Lol the Indian Boris is asking her mentor to leave 😂 ironical, she is bound to hurt her voting base.
 
Boris Johnson sacks Michael Gove

The prime minister has sacked Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Secretary, Michael Gove.
 
Consider the extremely awkward position he is in. He’s had to turn the Party’s focus inwards, to clear out the far left / antisemites. It’s not clear who Labour stand for these days. The blue collar switched to Tory because of identitarianism / Brexit / Corbyn’s perceived lack of patriotism. Starmer has to keep quiet on Brexit to win the Red Wall back and have a chance of gaining power.

I think they would be in a better place under Wes Streeting or Andy Burnham but it’s not their time.

Identity politics indeed.
 
Consider the extremely awkward position he is in. He’s had to turn the Party’s focus inwards, to clear out the far left / antisemites. It’s not clear who Labour stand for these days. The blue collar switched to Tory because of identitarianism / Brexit / Corbyn’s perceived lack of patriotism. Starmer has to keep quiet on Brexit to win the Red Wall back and have a chance of gaining power.

I think they would be in a better place under Wes Streeting or Andy Burnham but it’s not their time.

To be honest after Boris the Tories have noone they can put forward. These lot have completely burned their bridges by first backing Boris in No Confidence voting and now jumping ship because its sinking instead of any sense of morality. ANYONE from Labour would win. Let's see Starmer gets away with the upcoming decision of the case he's in, if he loses I'd rather thanks but goodbye from him.
 
Gove has been sacked.

Johnson has gone Full Trump, really thinks he can continue. He’s like Hitler in the bunker with the Russkis a mile away.
 
<b>Suella Braverman calls for PM to go and says she would stand for leadership</b>

The government's Attorney General Suella Braverman says it's "time to go" for Boris Johnson.

But despite calling on Prime Minister Boris Johnson to resign, she tells ITV's Robert Peston she will continue in her role.

Braverman adds "I don’t want to resign because I have that duty and we need an attorney in government”.

"The balance has tipped now in favour of saying that the prime minister - it pains me to say it - but it's time to go."

Asked whether she's considered standing in any leadership contest, she says she would put her name into the ring.
 
<b>Cabinet minister Simon Hart has just resigned</b>

Secretary of State for Wales Simon Hart has resigned from Boris Johnson's government.
 
The PM has fired Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Secretary Michael Gove, who earlier called for him to resign
 
At least 44 ministers and aides have quit since yesterday when Sajid Javid and Rishi Sunak said they were resigning.
 
Boris really digging his heels in here, he does not want to leave!
 
How is one man so desperate to hang on to power, uk political system is one big mess

This is what happens when you elect narcissistic sociopaths. Our systems are not set up to cope with people like Johnson. Thatcher was hard as nails but even she resigned when she lost the support of 40% of her MPs. She believed in the rules and had some sort of sense of duty.
 
Boris Johnson: Patel and Shapps join calls for PM to go

Boris Johnson is fighting to stay on in No 10 despite his support collapsing in another dramatic day of resignations.

The PM was defiant despite many previously-loyal supporters - including Priti Patel and Grant Shapps - calling for him to step down on Wednesday.

Welsh Secretary Simon Hart became the latest cabinet minister to quit, while Attorney General Suella Braverman launched a leadership challenge.

But the PM insisted he had a "colossal mandate to keep going" from voters.

Taking aim at his critics, the prime minister sacked Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove in a shock move, with a Downing Street source calling him a "snake" who "gleefully briefs the press that he has called for the leader to go".

Mr Gove, a former ally in the Brexit campaign but who derailed Mr Johnson's first bid for the Tory leadership, had urged the PM to resign earlier in the day.

His sacking on Wednesday evening came after more than 40 ministers and aides resigned - a record for a 24-hour period.

Even late into the night, the resignations continued, with Welsh Secretary Mr Hart standing down just before 23:00 BST.

Mr Hart said he had "no other option left", adding that colleagues had done their utmost in private and in public "to help you turn the ship around, but it is with sadness that I feel we have passed the point where this is possible".

He had been among a group of cabinet members who attempted to persuade the prime minister to stand down, which also included Mr Johnson's former close allies Home Secretary Ms Patel, Transport Secretary Mr Shapps and Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng.

Mr Johnson now has around 20 ministerial posts it needs to fill after the resignations.

Later on Wednesday night, former loyalist Ms Braverman joined the calls for Mr Johnson to stand down, telling ITV's Peston that he had handled matters "appallingly" in recent days.

She said she would not resign as it was her duty to carry on in her current job - but said: "If there is a leadership contest, I will put my name into the ring."

Former Health Secretary Matt Hancock also withdrew his backing for the PM, saying he had "supported him through thick and thin" but he now needed to go.

Mr Hancock - who said he would not be running for the leadership - predicted Mr Johnson would not be leader for much longer, "whether that's tomorrow or next week".

This morning, bluntly, there is a standoff.

A standoff between the prime minister and swathes of the Conservative Party, from the cabinet down.

The last two days have robbed Boris Johnson of much of his authority; but not yet his job.

He is still there in Downing Street - determined and defiant, his government pockmarked by unfilled ministerial vacancies after a slew of resignations.

Mr Johnson's career has been defined by a convention smashing attitude.

That style now confronts what some fear could soon be a constitutional conundrum: what happens if the prime minister won't budge.

The former Northern Ireland Secretary Julian Smith said it was a "disgrace" - "our system works on confidence, he has lost it," Mr Smith said, fearing what he called a "major constitutional situation".

Conservative backbenchers who want rid of the prime minister still have another option - changing the rules, next week, so another vote of confidence in him could be held.

2px presentational grey line
But some cabinet ministers - including Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab, Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries, Brexit Opportunities Minister Jacob Rees-Mogg remain loyal to the prime minister.

And justifying Mr Johnson staying in the role, a No 10 source said: "The prime minister has a mandate from 14 million people to get a job done... If the party wants to stop him they have to take that mandate away."

The BBC has also been told Mr Johnson has been stressing that "millions" voted for him, and questioning whether any of his would-be successors would be able to "replicate his electoral success at the next election".

Mr Johnson appeared in front of the Liaison Committee earlier on Wednesday - a group of MPs which scrutinises government decisions and policies.

He ruled out calling a snap general election, saying the earliest date he can see for one is 2024.

The PM survived a confidence vote last month and under current rules he is immune from another challenge for 12 months.

But there are elections next week to the top team of the 1922 Committee, which organises the confidence votes. Rebel Tories want to get elected so that they can push through a rule change so that a confidence vote can be held sooner.

The wave of resignations on Tuesday and Wednesday was triggered by revelations about the prime minister's handling of sexual misconduct allegations against former Deputy Chief Whip Chris Pincher.

On Tuesday, it emerged that Mr Johnson had been personally briefed about a complaint against Mr Pincher in 2019 when the Tamworth MP was a minister in the Foreign Office.

It contradicted days of denials from No 10 that the prime minister had known of any formal complaints about Mr Pincher, and prompted resignations that evening by two key cabinet colleagues, Chancellor Rishi Sunak and Health Secretary Sajid Javid.

Mr Javid told the Commons in his resignation speech on Wednesday that "enough was enough" and "the problem starts at the top and I believe that is not going to change".

The row is the latest issue to prompt Conservative MPs to question the prime minister's leadership and direction of government.

Mr Johnson's government has been dogged by a series of controversies in recent months, not least by a police investigation into parties in Downing Street during lockdown.

Some Tory MPs have also expressed dissent over tax rises, the government's response to rising living costs and its policy direction.

How could Boris Johnson go?
If party bosses change the one-year rule on leadership challenges, rebel Tory MPs could try again to oust him later this summer, or in the autumn.

If Mr Johnson lost a vote of no confidence in Parliament, he would have to resign or call an election.

Otherwise, he would have to resign himself - possibly in the face of cabinet pressure, like Margaret Thatcher - or after a fresh wave of ministerial resignations.

BBC
 
Amazing.

These back stabbing MPs are resigning over the handling of sexual misconduct *allegations* against former Deputy Chief Whip Chris Pincher, but remained dead silent when Westminster Peado ring allegations surfaced!

Boris should call a snap election, the polls have been wrong for the past few years, now it is time for these wet wipe MPs to find a proper job.
 
Helen Whateley and Brandon Lewis —

both just resigned.
 
More aides gone. 52 resignations now.

Can’t keep up with this.
 
Surely the only sensible solution is he has to resign. At this rate he won't have enough personnel for a workable Government.
 
Another resignation makes 53

James Cartlidge has stepped down as courts' minister.

He said: "As courts' minister, I have felt duty bound to remain in post because of the very challenging situation in the crown court. But it's clearly impossible to continue."

lcimg-21d8ef64-0ea7-4cce-b2a2-cce322bff228.jpg
 
Resignation statement being prepared in Number 10

A resignation statement is being prepared inside Downing Street, our deputy political editor Sam Coates understands.

Sam says: "Signs of splits even inside Number 10: one source says parts of Downing Street preparing a resignation statement but not clear the PM would read it and others insist Boris Johnson pressing on."
 
Alastair Campbell: Boris Johnson causing 'irreparable damage' to UK

Former communications director for Tony Blair, Alastair Campbell, says the current turmoil around Boris Johnson is "what happens when you put somebody like him in charge".

In his interview with Sky News yesterday morning (doesn't that feel a long time ago now!) newly appointed Chancellor Nadhim Zahawi seemed rather preoccupied with Mr Campbell - suggesting that it was commentators such as him who were behind attempts to derail the government.

Since then, dozens more members of the government have quit - it is unclear whether they had listened to Mr Campbell's own interview with Sky News and that was what persuaded them to go.

Regardless, the former spin doctor has been back on Sky News just now with his latest analysis of the extraordinary events in Westminster....

"We don't have a functioning government. We don't have a functional prime minister.

"Boris Johnson is somebody who thinks the rules don't apply to him, he's operated like that his entire existence and what you're seeing here is a single human testing massive constitutional principles."

Mr Campbell adds: "You can only govern with the support of parliament, which he is losing, and you can only govern with the support of your cabinet. which he is losing as well.

"And so he is now seeking yet again to say that the normal rules of life and of politics do not apply to him, and he's damaging the country in a way that I worry is irreparable."
 
Making a fool of himself Boris now.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Prime Minister: this is not sustainable and it will only get worse: for you, for the Conservative Party and most importantly of all the country. You must do the right thing and go now. <a href="https://t.co/F2iKT1PhvC">pic.twitter.com/F2iKT1PhvC</a></p>— Nadhim Zahawi (@nadhimzahawi) <a href="https://twitter.com/nadhimzahawi/status/1544950219657330688?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
You have to question why now? Because of Chris Pincher? No.

The reality is that Party-gate was the perfect opportunity to oust Boris, but never happened, because the government knew that Covid was a hoax all along.
 
BJ has now resigned.

Please use the new thread for thoughts, opinions, and reactions.
 
Boris Johnson and his allies have launched a legal fightback against a Commons inquiry into claims he lied to parliament about partygate.

The government has commissioned legal advice from a top QC, Lord Pannick, which the PM's supporters claim undermines the legitimacy of the inquiry.

Lord Pannick is a crossbench peer who has previously acted against the government for anti-Brexit campaigner Gina Miller and Shamima Begum over the removal of her British citizenship.

The inquiry into Mr Johnson, by the all-party Privileges Committee, has been denounced as "a witch-hunt" and "a kangaroo court" by his allies after the committee announced it could rule against him even if he did not deliberately mislead MPs.

As a result, Downing Street and the Cabinet Office called in Lord Pannick for a legal opinion, claiming the inquiry by the all-party committee could damage the functioning of government.

Supporters of the PM are now claiming Lord Pannick's advice should mean the end of the probe.

'Biased and chilling'

Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries told the Daily Mail: "This expert legal opinion shows that the inquiry was a biased, Kafkaesque witch-hunt - it should now be halted before it does any more damage.

"As a minister, you simply cannot verify every single piece of trusted advice and information you are given in good faith by well-intentioned and conscientious senior officials.

"What this potentially does is set a trap for every minister in the future, and it's a chilling prospect for the future of our democracy."

As Mr Johnson refuses to rule out plotting a political comeback, the stakes could not be higher for him. If he is found to be in contempt of parliament, he could be suspended or even kicked out of the Commons after a recall petition.

But ahead of the imminent publication of Lord Pannick's legal opinion, government sources are reported to be claiming it will be "absolutely devastating" for the committee's investigation.

'Paralyse democracy'

Tory leadership frontrunner Liz Truss signalled during party hustings she would like to scrap the inquiry. But that would engulf her in a cover-up and cronyism row similar to that over Owen Paterson, which badly damaged Mr Johnson.

Government sources approached by Sky News declined to comment on multiple reports about Lord Pannick's legal advice, but there was no attempt to deny their veracity either.

"This isn't for Boris, but for all future PMs and MPs," a source told The Daily Telegraph. "Ministers will never be able to say anything if they think they can be found in contempt by accidentally giving the wrong answer."

It is also claimed by Mr Johnson's supporters that the legal advice will show investigating ministers for misleading the House "in good faith" would create a chilling effect and would "paralyse democracy".

"Ministers will never be able to say anything if they think they can be found in contempt by accidentally giving the wrong answer," a source added.

The committee is poised to examine whether Mr Johnson misled the Commons when he claimed "all guidance was followed in No 10" and there was "no party" breaking lockdown rules.

There is fury among MPs loyal to Mr Johnson over the appointment of the Labour grandee Harriet Harman to chair the committee, because of her previous criticism of the PM over partygate.

She took over the chairmanship after another senior Labour MP, Chris Bryant, stood down because he had been a vocal and persistent critic of the PM over the accounts he gave to parliament.

Cabinet Office sources told The Daily Telegraph the advice was commissioned by the newly created Office of the Prime Minister, which is based in their department but reports to Downing Street. They suggested the advice will be published by No 10 rather than the Cabinet Office.

What do the rules say?

It had initially been assumed MPs on the Privileges Committee would have to prove Mr Johnson had "deliberately misled" the House of Commons over the extent of parties in Downing Street during the lockdowns.

This was based on parliament's ancient rulebook, Erskine May, which states that "the making of a deliberately misleading statement [is seen] as a contempt".

But when the committee published its motion in June, it only referred to whether Mr Johnson had "misled the House", lowering the burden of proof.

The committee is made up of seven MPs - four Tories, two Labour and one from the SNP - and has called for evidence of "Mr Johnson's knowledge of the activities in 10 Downing Street and the Cabinet Office under COVID-19 regulations, from the occurrence of those events until now", as well as "any briefing given to, or inquiries made by, Mr Johnson relating to those events".

The committee also said it would be "willing to take oral or written evidence from people who wish to remain anonymous", a move which has incensed Mr Johnson's allies on the Tory benches.

SKY
 
Boris Johnson is facing a fight for his political career after MPs said evidence strongly suggests breaches of COVID rules would have been "obvious" to the then-PM.

The cross-party privileges committee said the Commons may have been misled at least four times over Partygate allegations, and MPs are set to cross-examine Mr Johnson in the week beginning 20 March.

If the committee finds that Mr Johnson was in contempt of parliament he could face sanctions, including a suspension.

If the suspension is for longer than 10 days and the Commons agrees to it, his constituents in Uxbridge and South Ruislip could find themselves voting in a by-election.

The committee's preliminary report said: "The evidence strongly suggests that breaches of guidance would have been obvious to Mr Johnson at the time he was at the gatherings."

But Mr Johnson claimed the report "vindicated" his belief that he did not break any rules.

Mr Johnson said: "There's absolutely nothing to show that any adviser of mine or civil servant warned me in advance that events might be against the rules, nothing to say that afterwards they thought it was against the rules, nothing to show that I myself believed or was worried that something was against the rules."

https://news.sky.com/story/boris-jo...itical-career-after-partygate-report-12825069
 
Boris Johnson is less assured as the questions begin.

Sir Bernard Jenkin is no King's Counsel, but his slow methodical questioning about a farewell party for spin doctor Lee Cain suggests he has been closely watching former DPP Sir Keir Starmer at PMQs.

Then comes a piece of classic Johnson prose, claiming you can't expect staff in Number 10 to stay within an "electrified fence" without "wafting into each other's orbit".

I'm not sure if that helps his argument that social distancing was observed.

However, the inscrutable Lord Pannick hasn't yet felt the need to pass Mr Johnson any notes. He must believe it's going OK so far.

Sir Bernard appears to be in no hurry here.

And given the slow pace of his questioning here, we're in for a long afternoon…
 
Boris Johnson has sworn "hand on heart" he did not lie to MPs about partygate events in Downing Street - and said a gathering where he was pictured holding a glass in the air was "absolutely essential for work purposes".

The former prime minister also said the size of Number 10 made it difficult to social distance inside with staff following the guidance "to the best of our ability".

Mr Johnson is facing the cross-party Privileges Committee as they investigate whether he misled parliament by denying events in Number 10 while COVID regulations were in place. He could be suspended from the Commons and face a by-election as a result if they find he purposefully misled the House.

In his opening remarks, Mr Johnson swore "hand on heart, I did not lie to the House" after swearing an oath on the King James Bible to tell the truth during the session.

"When this inquiry was set up I was completely confident that you would find nothing to show that I knew or believed anything else, as indeed you have not," he said.

"I was confident, not because there has been some kind of cover-up. I was confident because I knew that was what I believed and that is why I said it."

He added that there is no evidence of officials raising issues about breaking rules "because that never happened" as he accused the committee of not giving people at the events the chance to explain themselves.

SKY
 
Boris Johnson to admit he 'unquestionably made mistakes' at COVID inquiry – report

Boris Johnson will reportedly tell the COVID inquiry that he "unquestionably made mistakes" during the pandemic, but his decisions helped save tens of thousands of lives.

The former prime minister is due to give evidence next week - and according to The Times, he will issue an "unreserved apology" and admit his government was "initially far too complacent" about the threats posed by the virus.

Mr Johnson is expected to express regret for boasting about shaking hands with patients on a coronavirus ward and defend the timings of the UK's three lockdowns.

He is set to argue that failing to act would have caused thousands more "miserable and unnecessary deaths - some of them in hospital car parks and corridors".

Last month, England's chief medical officer Professor Chris Whitty told the inquiry that he believes the first lockdown in March 2020 came "a bit too late".

But The Times is reporting that Mr Johnson will claim Prof Whitty was "instrumental in arguing for a delay" - and the possibility of a lockdown was first discussed three weeks before it was enforced.

The ex-PM is also expected to deny saying that he had a "let it rip" attitude towards COVID, with a view to achieving herd immunity.

Mr Johnson is expected to face difficult questions on multiple issues - including partygate, his communications with government colleagues, and the evidence heard so far.

The report suggests that the former politician is preparing to argue that his WhatsApp messages have been taken out of context, meaning "dark humour is lost or morphs into mockery".

Eat Out to Help Out is also likely to be discussed, amid claims that the government's COVID-19 taskforce was "blindsided" when the controversial scheme was announced.

Mr Johnson is expected to argue that the policy was "properly discussed" with Prof Whitty and former chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance.

According to the newspaper, then chancellor Rishi Sunak and de facto chief of staff Dominic Cummings are both set to be largely absent from Mr Johnson's written testimony, which is likely to be published after his appearance in front of the inquiry.

Aides to Mr Johnson have said they were not responsible for briefing The Times.

A spokesman was quoted as saying: "Boris Johnson will be at the COVID inquiry next week and is looking forward to assisting the inquiry with its important work."

SKY NEWS
 
Boris Johnson appears emotional as he recalls COVID hospital stay

Boris Johnson appeared to become emotional as he recalled being admitted to intensive care with coronavirus to reject suggestions he did not care about the suffering of the public.

The former prime minister insisted he was not "reconciled" to COVID deaths or thought it wise to "let it rip" in the autumn of 2020, as he faced a second day of questioning at the official inquiry into the pandemic.

Day two of his evidence

Mr Johnson called the partygate scandal a "travesty of the truth"
• He "fought and fought" to keep schools open during the third wave in 2021 but the Alpha variant made lockdown "inevitable"
• Eat Out to Help Out was not seen as a "gamble" at the time and he was "perplexed" at suggestion top scientists were unaware of the scheme
• He refused to accept the first lockdown, and other restrictions later in 2020, came too late

At one point, when pressed repeatedly about his apparent cavalier attitude to the elderly, Mr Johnson said: "I just want to remind you that when I went into ITU, intensive care, I saw around me... a lot of people who were not actually elderly. In fact they were middle-aged men and they were quite like me. And some of us were going to make it and some of us weren't.

"And what I am trying to tell you in a nutshell - and the NHS thank God did an amazing job and helped me survive - but I knew from that experience what an appalling disease this is. I had absolutely no personal doubt about that from March onwards.
also heard:

"To say that I didn't care about the suffering that was being inflicted on the country is simply not right."

Mr Johnson spent three nights in intensive care in April 2020, when then deputy prime minister Dominic Raab was tasked with running the country.


The emotional statement came after the ex-Tory leader was shown extracts from the diaries of former chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance which described Mr Johnson as saying, on multiple occasions in the second half of 2020, the government should "let it rip" (the virus) through the population.

Source : Sky News
 
You got to hand it to the media and the British public.

The Covid agenda was done and dusted and replaced with the Ukraine war. The Ukraine war was then replaced the cost of living crisis and interest rate rises, which was then replaced with Isreal war narrative.

Now that these narratives have been exhausted, what next? Ahh yes, lets get back to Covid and Partygate because it might boost Labour's numbers in the upcoming GE.

Where are all the lefties and agenda benders who were name calling those who didn't believe the Covid narrative, cancelling those who refused to take the Covid vaccine? The same lefties who went into hiding when the Telegraph released Whatsapp messages from government officials confirming the Covid agenda was planned from the sensationalist media reporting, to the misleading death certificates?

The truth ultimately won, but no, lets regurgitate Partygate from a few years ago in hope there gullible can make a difference!
 
Boris Johnson faces ‘serious questions’ over new business with uranium entrepreneur

Boris Johnson failed to disclose that he met a uranium lobbyist while prime minister before entering into a new business with a controversial Iranian-Canadian uranium entrepreneur, the Observer can reveal.

Johnson’s new company Better Earth Limited also employs Charlotte Owen, a junior aide with just a few years work experience whom he elevated to the House of Lords last year at the age of 29, sparking intense controversy.

Transparency campaigners say there appear to be “serious public interest questions to be answered” over the nature and timeline of Johnson’s relationship with his co-director, Amir Adnani, the founder, president and CEO of Uranium Energy Corp, a US-based mining and exploration company, championed by former Trump advisor Steve Bannon.

Amir Adnani, a Canadian citizen who is the director of a network of offshore companies based in the British Virgin Islands, incorporated Better Earth in December last year. On 1 May, Companies House filings reveal, “The Rt Hon Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson” was added as a director and co-chairman. And this summer, Charlotte Owen – now Baroness Owen of Alderley Edge – joined the company to work alongside him as its vice president.

The Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba), which oversees ex-ministerial appointments, explicitly warned Johnson in April 2024 that the “broad overlap” between his roles in office and at Better Earth may entail “unknown risks” because of the lack of transparency over the firm’s clients. A statement from the Cabinet Office noted the potential for a conflict of interests particularly because of “the unknown nature of Better Earth’s clients – specifically that there is a risk of a client engaging in lobbying the UK government.” The committee also told the former prime minister it feared “that you could offer Better Earth unfair access and influence across government”.

Acoba was reassured that Johnson “did not meet with, nor did you make any decisions specific to Better Earth during your time in office”. But the Observer can reveal that Johnson met Scott Melbye, the executive vice-president of Uranium Energy Corp – Adnani’s company – in the House of Commons in May 2022 when he was still prime minister.

Adnani’s social media post about the event claimed that Melbye and Johnson spoke about “nuclear power and uranium”.

Neither Johnson or Adnani have responded to press inquiries about this encounter or when they first met. The encounter was not recorded in the prime minister’s official diary.

Uranium is the raw ingredient for the enriched uranium needed to fuel nuclear reactors. Just days before leaving office, Johnson announced a £700m investment in the controversial Sizewell C reactor stating the country needed to “Go nuclear, go large!”. At the time, Caroline Lucas, the then Green MP and former party leader, described Sizewell C as “massively costly, achingly slow and carries huge unnecessary risks”.

Among those who cheered the Sizewell C investment was Adnani. He excitedly posted the announcement on his Twitter account: “Boris Johnson plans to sign off on new £30bn nuclear plant in his final week in power! #uranium.”

Adnani has appeared at least twice on former Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast, and on one occasion told him that his ambition was to achieve “full spectrum energy dominance”.

Headquartered in a serviced office building in Sevenoaks, Better Earth describes itself as an “energy transition company”. Its website, which is currently under construction, says it will “work directly with national governments and regions that are seeking both inward investment and/or to reduce their emissions ahead of 2030”.

The apparent lack of transparency extends beyond the nature of the firm’s clients: the company no longer has a person of significant control registered at Companies House. The initial filing states that its single share is owned by another company called “Emissions Reduction Corp” registered in Carson City, Nevada.

US company searches reveal the firm was previously called Carbon Royalty Corporation, a Delaware-based company whose directors include Adnani and Nicole Shanahan, who was until recently Robert F Kennedy Jr’s running mate in his campaign for US president before he endorsed Trump. Delaware is a “dark” jurisdiction but sources suggest Carbon Royalty Corporation has raised $40m since it was incorporated in 2021 and its investors appear “undisclosed”, although this is not illegal.

Baroness Margaret Hodge, the former Labour MP who led parliament’s Public Accounts Committee from 2010-2015 said there were “at least four very serious public interest questions” to be answered about the appointment.

“What on earth is an ex-prime minister of the United Kingdom doing, working for a company with an opaque structure? In my experience those who choose to have a UK company owned by a foreign entity only do that because they may have something to hide. What is it in this case? Given the sensitivities around nuclear capabilities we should know who he is in business with, where the money is coming from and why he is using a financial structure that appears to hide the beneficial ownership of the company.”

Better Earth, Amir Adnani and Boris Johnson declined to respond to the Observer’s inquiries about Better Earth’s line of work, funding or any other matters.

The appointment also raises further question marks over Johnson’s relationship with Baroness Owen, a previously unknown junior political adviser who had worked for a matter of months with Johnson at Number 10. Her appointment to the Lords, where she took the title Baroness Owen of Alderley Edge in July last year, became the subject of intense speculation. With just a few years’ job experience under her belt, she now holds the position for life. In her maiden speech in November last year, she thanked Johnson for “putting a great deal of trust in me”.

That trust has now been extended to a senior role in his new company, Better Earth, though her role has also not been widely publicised. She recently updated her House of Lords page to note that she has a paid position as “Vice President, Better Earth Limited (energy transition company)” though she does not appear on the company’s website, X feed or LinkedIn page.

Owen mentioned climate only briefly in her maiden speech earlier this year, preferring to showcase her interest in technology, and has no previous employment experience in environmental, nuclear, or green issues. She declined to answer any of the Observer’s questions about her role.

Owen joins two other former Conservative ministers at the firm: Chris Skidmore, who resigned the whip and the party over Rishi Sunak’s oil and gas plan, is Better Earth’s COO, while Nigel Adams, a Johnson ally and former minister without portfolio, is CEO. There is no suggestion that either Skidmore or Adams were in breach of transparency rules.

Before Johnson became a director of Better Earth in May this year, he wrote to Acoba, the government watchdog, alerting them to the appointment. This came during the same period Acoba had accused him of refusing to answer its questions about whom he’d met as a consultant on behalf of a hedge fund, Merlyn Advisors, during a trip to Venezuela.

The incident led the committee’s chairman, Eric Pickles, to warn that Johnson’s behaviour had proved its rules were “unenforceable”.

SOURCE: https://www.theguardian.com/politic...uestions-uranium-business-charlotte-owen-aide
 
Back
Top