What's new

Canada denies entry to CRPF officer for serving government that ‘violates human rights’: Report

WebGuru

Senior ODI Player
Joined
Mar 4, 2013
Runs
21,339
Post of the Week
3
The Indian Ministry of External Affairs called the description ‘completely unacceptable’.

Canada refused to give entry to a retired Central Reserve Police Force officer last week, allegedly because they considered that he had served an administration that engaged in “terrorism, systematic or gross human rights violations, or genocide”, Hindustan Times reported on Tuesday.

The Ministry of External Affairs responded to the report, saying that this characterisation of the CRPF is “completely unacceptable”, adding that it had taken up the incident with Canada, ANI reported.

Tejinder Singh Dhillon, who had retired as inspector general of police in 2010, was stopped at the Vancouver airport with his wife on May 18 and questioned for up to seven hours, the report said. He was “declared inadmissible” under a part of the country’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Dhillon was also given a document that said he had been a senior official in the government that “in the opinion of the Minister, engages or has engaged in terrorism, systematic or gross human rights violations, or genocide, a war crime or a crime against humanity”.

Immigration officials later issued a second report that had no mention of any human rights violations by the government. However, it still said Canada could not allow Dhillon entry to the country because he had worked for a force that had “committed widespread and systemic human rights abuses, for example torture, arbitrary detention, murder and sexual assault”.

Dhillon, 67, told HT that he has visited Canada several times, while he had served in the CRPF and afterwards, and that he holds a visa that is valid until 2024. The publication said Global Affairs Canada had not responded when they contacted it for a comment.

The report added that Dhillon claimed Vancouver immigration officials had behaved with him in an “unreasonable and indecent manner”. He was questioned for several hours and given a break because a former politician had intervened. He was then questioned again the next day, after which authorities cancelled his visa and deported him. Dhillon’s wife also returned with him.

India’s ties with Canada might be even more strained after this incident. In April, Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh had called the country’s defence minister a “Khalistani sympathiser” and had refused to meet him during a trip to India. India had also put down an Ontario resolution that had called the 1984 anti-Sikh riots “genocide”.



Source: https://scroll.in/bulletins/62/harv...iness-education-to-india-with-online-programs
 
India and Canada can never be natural allies, irrespective of how many Indian nationals live there.

Canada's involvement in multiple Indian matters and also the delay in air India blast case ,made it pretty evident of their support to the issue,only after their own nationals died did they clear out the militant outfits.

What is confusing to me as an Indian is Canada is seen as a front for Human rights even though their army was involved in a war with a country far away (Iraq) and the ones participating in that Sajjan is the current defense minister.

Remarkable how Western countries can not only fool their own ppl but also the world, at least in South Asia it's their own people.

Maybe Indian media should print this news in a way that a 'miltiancy' movement that killed Canadian nationals and the Indian officer that fought against it has been denied Canadian entry.
 
Canada denies ex-CRPF officer entry over 'human rights' violation, regrets after India strongly objects

Canada has regretted its officer telling the retired CRPF officer that he served in an organisation that allegedly engaged in "terrorism" and "gross human rights violations".In a statement, High Commissioner of Canada Nadir Patel said the language in the document "does not reflect the government of Canada's policy toward India or any particular organisation, including the Central Reserve Police Force of India. The Central Reserve Police Force plays an important role in upholding law and order in India".

http://www.indiatoday.in/story/cana...-rights-violation-india-protest/1/961577.html
 
The Canadian High Commission in New Delhi on Tuesday regretted any inconvenience that might have been experienced by the retired Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) officer who was not allowed to enter into the country.

"Form letters in use by the Government of Canada include generic language taken from Canada's legislation. In this case, the language does not reflect the Government of Canada's policy toward India or any particular organization, including the Central Reserve Police Force of India. The Central Reserve Police Force plays an important role in upholding law and order in India."



http://www.business-standard.com/ar...-entry-to-retired-crpf-ig-117052301841_1.html
 
India and Canada can never be natural allies, irrespective of how many Indian nationals live there.

Canada's involvement in multiple Indian matters and also the delay in air India blast case ,made it pretty evident of their support to the issue,only after their own nationals died did they clear out the militant outfits.

What is confusing to me as an Indian is Canada is seen as a front for Human rights even though their army was involved in a war with a country far away (Iraq) and the ones participating in that Sajjan is the current defense minister.

Remarkable how Western countries can not only fool their own ppl but also the world, at least in South Asia it's their own people.

Maybe Indian media should print this news in a way that a 'miltiancy' movement that killed Canadian nationals and the Indian officer that fought against it has been denied Canadian entry.

That is pure, unadulterated, realpolitik. When nation states speak of Human Rights and morality, they conveniently hold others to a higher standard than they'd ever hold themselves to. This is why you see the likes of India and Pakistan calling each other out for gross human rights violations in Kashmir and Balochistan, or state sponsored religious intolerance despite both being among the worst of the worst offenders on the face of the planet. This is the same reason a state like Qatar can cry racism when shady dealings behind their bid for the soccer world cup are questioned even though Qatar is one of the most racist states on earth.

This is just how the world works. There are winners and losers. They both do the same things (to varying degrees though) but the former get away with it while the latter feign righteousness and cry blue murder about the actions of others. The only countries that at least have some moral standing to lecture others are Germany, Sweden and, to a lesser extent, Norway.
 
Excellent decision taken by the best country on the face of the planet.
 
That is pure, unadulterated, realpolitik. When nation states speak of Human Rights and morality, they conveniently hold others to a higher standard than they'd ever hold themselves to. This is why you see the likes of India and Pakistan calling each other out for gross human rights violations in Kashmir and Balochistan, or state sponsored religious intolerance despite both being among the worst of the worst offenders on the face of the planet. This is the same reason a state like Qatar can cry racism when shady dealings behind their bid for the soccer world cup are questioned even though Qatar is one of the most racist states on earth.

This is just how the world works. There are winners and losers. They both do the same things (to varying degrees though) but the former get away with it while the latter feign righteousness and cry blue murder about the actions of others. The only countries that at least have some moral standing to lecture others are Germany, Sweden and, to a lesser extent, Norway.

So in general its about who is more creative about portraying the human rights violation,the ones that are clever portray using movies,literature,journalism.
Meaning at the end of the day there is no right or wrong in general,its basically politics and creative manipulation.
 
Back
Top