What's new

"Change Quetta Gladiators’ name if you’re not including Baloch cricketers in PSL"

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,977
"Change Quetta Gladiators’ name if you’re not including Baloch cricketers in PSL"

QUETTA: Cricket associations of Balochistan were infuriated over the non-inclusion of local Balochi cricketers in Quetta Gladiators, SAMAA TV reported on Wednesday.

Cricket associations of Balochistan were furious at the non-inclusion of Baloch players in the Pakistan Super League edition 3.

"If you cannot include local Baloch cricketers in the Pakistan Super League then change the name of Quetta Gladiators," said Hammad Mengal, Secretary of the Quetta Cricket Association.

A member of PCB's Governing Board, Murad Ismail, declared his support for the stance taken by the cricket associations of Balochistan.

PSL's Quetta Gladiators team represents the province of Balochistan in the competition. Other teams taking part in the competition are Islamabad United, Peshawar Zalmi, Lahore Qalandars, Multan Sultan and Karachi Kings.

https://www.samaa.tv/sports/2017/11/balochistan-cricket-association-fumes/
 
I can see this becoming an issue soon. Think a little bit of smart thinking could solve the issue.
 
Poor stuff from Quetta Gladiators...

While all the franchises were busy conducting talent hunts in their respective regions Quetta is busy selecting Azam Khan,son of Moin...

They have every right to be angry at QG

Coming from a QG fan
 
I am assuming that now they will pick a player from Quetta since the number of players per team has increased to 21..
 
The problem could be solved by mandating atleast 2 mandatory local players in some category such as emerging etc.

I do sympathize. How will they support Quetta Gladiators made with no local players. Same for other teams.
 
I can see this becoming an issue soon. Think a little bit of smart thinking could solve the issue.
They shouldn't have gone the nepotistic route, selecting Azam Khan instead of Bismallah. Bismallah is not a bad player and was a regular part for two years, now coach's son wants to play.
 
If admin. allow I can post a vdo clip of program where Quetta Gladiator owner Nadeem Omar and Moin Khan were guests, and they were probed about all the issues from inclusion of Azam Khan to absence of Balochistan regional players.

Firstly Quetta is the only franchise that selected all the top performers from recent QEA, like Saad Ali, Ramiz Raja jr and Saud Shakeel,which no other franchise did or had the foresight of doing. Also these players and most in the top 10 of QEA are part of Pakistan cricket Academy managed by Nadeem Omar so it was really great decision as no other franchise was interested in supporting new talent and kept their onus on TTFs.

Nadeem Omar also stated Bismillah Khan will be traveling with the side as he is ambassador of QG from Balochistan and there is one or 2 more players of Balochistan-origin they'll pick who would be with the team in the UAE. There is a Balochistan player Nazar Hussain who also was discussed he can be picked as 21st player. They also complained about zero support from Balochistan govt. to help QG in logistics an other major issues, to help train and find talent in the province. QG did organize some inter-school cricket tournament in Quetta, and there were 5-6 players who made to the U-19 trials and were picked..

With regards to Azam Khan, Ndeem Omar had wanteed him in the team last year but Moin Khan himself refused. Azam Khan is a wicket keeper/batsman who Nadeem Omar compared with Chris Gayle as he has same hitting ability. He has played for Omar Associates and played an international T20 for Dallas T20 League in US which I checked. His average was around 13, with one score of 44 and strike rate of 183.
 
Last edited:
If admin. allow I can post a vdo clip of program where Quetta Gladiator owner Nadeem Omar and Moin Khan were guests, and they were probed about all the issues from inclusion of Azam Khan to absence of Balochistan regional players.

Firstly Quetta is the only franchise that selected all the top performers from recent QEA, like Saad Ali, Ramiz Raja jr and Saud Shakeel,which no other franchise did or had the foresight of doing. Also these players and most in the top 10 of QEA are part of Pakistan cricket Academy managed by Nadeem Omar so it was really great decision as no other franchise was interested in supporting new talent and kept their onus on TTFs.

Nadeem Omar also stated Bismillah Khan will be traveling with the side as he is ambassador of QG from Balochistan and there is one or 2 more players of Balochistan-origin they'll pick who would be with the team in the UAE. There is a Balochistan player Nazar Hussain who also was discussed he can be picked as 21st player. They also complained about zero support from Balochistan govt. to help QG in logistics an other major issues, to help train and find talent in the province. QG did organize some inter-school cricket tournament in Quetta, and there were 5-6 players who made to the U-19 trials and were picked..

With regards to Azam Khan, Ndeem Omar had wanteed him in the team last year but Moin Khan himself refused. Azam Khan is a wicket keeper/batsman who Nadeem Omar compared with Chris Gayle as he has same hitting ability. He has played for Omar Associates and played an international T20 for Dallas T20 League in US which I checked. His average was around 13, with one score of 44 and strike rate of 183.

Should be mandatory to select 5 local players maximum from the pool of 20 you have at your disposal. There is a lot of raw talent in that province going to waste. Azam Khan might very well be a very talented guy but Moin Khan has done no favours on himself because it looks like blatant nepotism.

Can name so many local players from each team that did not make it

Peshawar Alone - Taj Wali, Gauhar Ali, Khushdil Shah, Adil Amin, Nabi Gul, Musadiq Ahmed, Imran Khan (These guys win domestic T20 for their team) and do not make it
 
Last edited:
If admin. allow I can post a vdo clip of program where Quetta Gladiator owner Nadeem Omar and Moin Khan were guests, and they were probed about all the issues from inclusion of Azam Khan to absence of Balochistan regional players.

Firstly Quetta is the only franchise that selected all the top performers from recent QEA, like Saad Ali, Ramiz Raja jr and Saud Shakeel,which no other franchise did or had the foresight of doing. Also these players and most in the top 10 of QEA are part of Pakistan cricket Academy managed by Nadeem Omar so it was really great decision as no other franchise was interested in supporting new talent and kept their onus on TTFs.

Nadeem Omar also stated Bismillah Khan will be traveling with the side as he is ambassador of QG from Balochistan and there is one or 2 more players of Balochistan-origin they'll pick who would be with the team in the UAE. There is a Balochistan player Nazar Hussain who also was discussed he can be picked as 21st player. They also complained about zero support from Balochistan govt. to help QG in logistics an other major issues, to help train and find talent in the province. QG did organize some inter-school cricket tournament in Quetta, and there were 5-6 players who made to the U-19 trials and were picked..

With regards to Azam Khan, Ndeem Omar had wanteed him in the team last year but Moin Khan himself refused. Azam Khan is a wicket keeper/batsman who Nadeem Omar compared with Chris Gayle as he has same hitting ability. He has played for Omar Associates and played an international T20 for Dallas T20 League in US which I checked. His average was around 13, with one score of 44 and strike rate of 183.


But they are all from Karachi, of course they deserve to be selected but that is the problem people have, Omar is using the Quetta name to groom players from Karachi and at the same time ignore whatever talent the province has, why did they not select Muhammad Asghar? They had the chance in the very first year or Nazar Hussain, Chaman and Pishin respectively, do you think they bid for Quetta intentionally as a first choice? I am pretty certain their first choice was Karachi but were out bid by ARY.

Like I said should be compulsory to include 5 local players from each region to avoid stuff like this, the situation there is sensitive anyway, why stoke the fire, entire local Quetta fanbase is fuming.
 
PCB has a duty to promote cricket in all regions of Pakistan.It is unfair to neglect cricket in Balochistan.Players from Balochistan
should be selected in all formats of cricket.PSL is a very high profile competition hence selected local players will benefit cricket in the long term.
 
Quetta Gladiator should never have been a team. How many players are there in Balochistan that have played for Pakistan? Another lack of common sense from PCB especially Sethi when they devised their strategy for this tournament.
 
If it was up to me, there should be a rule wherein at least 3 players should from the squad should be born in the city of the PSL franchise.
 
Poor stuff from Quetta Gladiators...

While all the franchises were busy conducting talent hunts in their respective regions Quetta is busy selecting Azam Khan,son of Moin...

They have every right to be angry at QG

Coming from a QG fan
I have the same feelings bro, and that is why I hope they finish in last place.
 
All franchises are privately owned by businessmen. They bought teams to make more money, not to fulfill our desires. They will do what is best for their business. They are more concerned about selecting a better player who could make them win than the people sitting behind the keyboard.

People will always find many problems in everything, but the bottom line is there are 180 players playing in PSL and teams would pick those 180 players THEMSELVES for the teams THEY OWN.
 
As I said earlier The Quetta team has zero connection with Balochistan.

And it's also unfair to make it mandatory to select players from the franchise province/city as there is big difference in talent existing in other cities compared to Quetta.

However that does not mean QG should not invest and make talent hunts in Balochistan.
 
All franchises are privately owned by businessmen. They bought teams to make more money, not to fulfill our desires. They will do what is best for their business. They are more concerned about selecting a better player who could make them win than the people sitting behind the keyboard.

People will always find many problems in everything, but the bottom line is there are 180 players playing in PSL and teams would pick those 180 players THEMSELVES for the teams THEY OWN.

That's not correct. They are using a name of a place. The people of those places has every right to voice their opinion. If the people of those places has no connection with the team it will not be succesful in the long run.
 
That's not correct. They are using a name of a place. The people of those places has every right to voice their opinion. If the people of those places has no connection with the team it will not be succesful in the long run.

Being successful or not is another topic. Here we are talking about a franchise owned by Nadeem Omar not by the people of Balochistan. When you're investing in a business you are not looking for sentiments or making connection, you want your business to be successful and you will do what you feel best for making it successful.

They are owning a franchise that is not particularly representing the people of Quetta. Yes, everyone has every right to voice their opinion but owner will always do whatever he feels is best for their franchise.
 
Wondering if IPL had a Srinagar team and no Kashmiri players were included, the same logic around "franchise business sense" will be applied by PPers.
 
Yes I don't identify with the Karachi Kings team either... most of the Karachi players are playing in Quetta
 
How is it the fault of the franchises if there is not a single high quality cricketer is coming from Balochistan
 
Apparently quetta gladiators look like they have the poorest owners... they also look clueless as to their representation of Balochistan.

Another reason is security, there was just another terrorist attack recently and 15 punjabi students killed today.

You can't promote cricket there if there is no place thats safe besides some areas of Quetta.
 
PCB is making the same mistake it did in the 1960s

West Pakistan 45% of the population=12 teams
East Pakistan 55% of population=ONLY 1 TEAM

No wonder no bengali player could play for Pakistan.....
The same will happen with Quetta if they do not set a regional quota..
 
Wondering if IPL had a Srinagar team and no Kashmiri players were included, the same logic around "franchise business sense" will be applied by PPers.

Yes but in your case..team ki nobat nahi aye LOL

It is far worse in your situation..
 
Anyone would angry... this is total crap.. local player have to play.. They should be a quetta for local player.. Not picking any local player is just absurd
 
A business always involves atleast two parties. The franchise owners are in it for their business but we also should not forget who they are doing business with: people of Pakistan.

It is supply and demand after all.

The issue of including at least one local player can't be shrugged off by saying it's business and franchises are only looking to improve their chances of winning by whatever means possible, when in reality the franchises already have to fulfill certain requirements such as a limited number of foreign players they can field and to select at least two emerging ie unproven/untested players.

Who are we kidding? It's obvious most of the time it's just a friend helping out another friend to make money. If I am somewhat involved in the league I am going to make some silly excuse to get my friend involved too. How else can you explain so many bizarre and ridiculous decisions. For example Saeed Ajmal isn't good enough to play in the IU team as a player so they made him a coach instead. Such kind of things just disgust me. All you need to do is take a closer look at the squads and the franchises and you can easily judge how many of them are really there because they are actually qualified to be there.

We ourselves claim that cricket is one of the few things which brings joy to the whole nation. So we can't just play it down as just another sports league, no different to leagues all around the world. When in reality it can be used to build bridges among each others.

No one is asking the franchise owners to throw huge money on unproven and unknown local player. The sad reality is that only just a little bit of attention and consideration can have a huge effect. We just fail to realize the opportunities at hand and are just hell-bent upon shooting ourselves in the foot. Instead of making excuses to promote the game and to promote those with less opportunities we are finding reasons to excuse those who profit the most from showing some kind of responsibility.
 
These would be cosmetic changes and anyone suggesting otherwise is fooling themselves.

The other quotas have merit.

With "Foreign Players" or "Emerging Players" the restriction has to do with an abundance of options. Teams often want to have one more!

With a "Local Players" quota, you're asking for an unnecessary change that will lead to random players getting selected before being benched. Any competent local player would already have been selected with or without the quota.
 
Anyone would angry... this is total crap.. local player have to play.. They should be a quetta for local player.. Not picking any local player is just absurd

The QG had my sympathy in the previous seasons because of their "association" with an underrepresented region. I remember reading " Shan-e-pakistan, shan-e-balochistan" on the Quetta Gladiators shirt in the previous seasons. If I were from there I would be heavily disgusted by such shameless, opportunistic and emotionally manipulative slogans with no real world application.
 
These would be cosmetic changes and anyone suggesting otherwise is fooling themselves.

The other quotas have merit.

With "Foreign Players" or "Emerging Players" the restriction has to do with an abundance of options. Teams often want to have one more!

With a "Local Players" quota, you're asking for an unnecessary change that will lead to random players getting selected before being benched. Any competent local player would already have been selected with or without the quota.

The point behind such a category would be that the franchise owners and the highly competent "coaching staff" would have to take some responsibility and have a look at the local talent. They can't just be lazy and pick any random kid passing by. We already know there is a talented opening batsman named Bismillah Khan. Such an incentive would only give rise to more and more locals taking interest in the game and seeing it as an viable option.

We can't fool ourselves. A kid in Quetta doesn't have access to the same facilities than a kid in lahore. Hence the franchises should at least be willing to invest a bit in the region whose name they are using to promote themselves. The squad consists of 20players and some of them wouldn't get a single game to play why can't a local guy be among one of those 20? Especially when you already have a local who is more than worthy of playing in the starting XI.

It's also obvious that the currently selected players aren't the best of the best in the draft.
 
The point behind such a category would be that the franchise owners and the highly competent "coaching staff" would have to take some responsibility and have a look at the local talent. They can't just be lazy and pick any random kid passing by. We already know there is a talented opening batsman named Bismillah Khan. Such an incentive would only give rise to more and more locals taking interest in the game and seeing it as an viable option.

We can't fool ourselves. A kid in Quetta doesn't have access to the same facilities than a kid in lahore. Hence the franchises should at least be willing to invest a bit in the region whose name they are using to promote themselves. The squad consists of 20players and some of them wouldn't get a single game to play why can't a local guy be among one of those 20? Especially when you already have a local who is more than worthy of playing in the starting XI.

It's also obvious that the currently selected players aren't the best of the best in the draft.

There might be a better way to approach this.

What about an incentive for teams to select local talent? For example, 1-2 slots where the cap hit doesn't count against the salary cap as long as the player is from your region?

This would ensure it's not mandatory but gives teams financial incentive to pick at least 1 local player. I'm sure all teams would take advantage of it.
 
To be frank this is an issue with the IPL as well. Franchises are so hung up with winning the title, developing local talent is least of their concerns.
 
Aftab Baloch played for PAK though I am not sure if he is Balochi or not.

It should have been mandatory to pick at least 2/3 players from local city/state and may be one in playing XI. As of now, PSL names are thematic because there is no home for clubs, but in future ideally 6 (or 8) teams will have their home ground and matches will be played on Home & Away basis (For QG, it’ll be Bugti stadium or may be at Gawadar), then indeed it will be an issue. I believe Nazar Hussain, Asghar & Bismillah are ethnically Baloch, there must be few other young players from that city, which has a metro population of 2.5 mn - that’s actually more than any BPL city apart from Dhaka, Chittagong and may be Sylhet.

Omar Associates have done great for PAK cricket, but I feel they haven’t come out of Karachi first mentality - couldn’t compete with Salman Iqbal, so went for QG; but they should have thought for this. 2/3 players in 20 men squad doesn’t make it much difference for a squad cheapest & comfortably the weakest in PSL on papers. Asghar wasn’t released by PZ, but that could have been managed also.
 
PCB is making the same mistake it did in the 1960s

West Pakistan 45% of the population=12 teams
East Pakistan 55% of population=ONLY 1 TEAM

No wonder no bengali player could play for Pakistan.....
The same will happen with Quetta if they do not set a regional quota..

You are making absurd statements since the start.

Many cricketers from East Pakistan region team played for Pakistan like Naseem ul Ghani or Munaf.
Ethnic Bengali who almost made to the side was Roquib ul Hassan, in Dhaka,1969 test series against New Zealand. Aftab Baloch and Asian bradman Zaheer Abbas made intl. debut for the side. Many ethnic Bengali players from Pakistan first class represented Bangladesh like Shafi ul Hassan.

Bangladesh initially favored football, it was Pakistani players like Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis in the 80s who went to their country and generated interest in the game.
[MENTION=141768]GudduBadmash[/MENTION]

Franchises are free to do as they please, there is no rule mandated by the PCB for them to take regional players who they represent. Even the emerging player is not compulsory he should be from the same region he represents.

From all the franchisee, Nadeem Omar is the only person in PSL who has history of financially supporting/backing players from poor background who went onto represent Pakistan e.g. Anwar Ali
Nadeem Omar did'nt take players of his club he took the 3[saud, saad ali, ramiz] of the top 10 performers from the Quaid e Azam trophy who would've been ignored by the rest of franchisee, there is a lack of vision and imposing commercial interest which will be more important in the future. Due to the nepotism from the PCB, where Akmals, Wahab Riaz and Malik are unofficially mandatory, all young talent from Punjab to KPK to Karachi are at a disadvantage and lesser opportunities, Balochistan-residing who are already few in the circuit are further away. Most of the Balochistan-resident players are Pakhtun and very few are ethnic Baloch. Football and boxing are more popular sports amongst the Baloch, cricket comes much later in their priority. The biggest losers in PSL are talented cricketers from KPK.


Balochistan suffers from lot of issues, biggest issue is lack of physical infrastructure which changed just recently with highways built. For a youngster from poor/student background to travel from South Balochistan [Gwadar, Lasbela] to his capital Quetta he has to reach Karachi, Sind first and from there he'll take a road to Quetta, the expensive travel fare makes it impossible for youngster to take the route knowing it is a tough gamble. The cricket structure there is also factionalised like rest of Pakistan meaning every club pushes their own players and do politics. Murad from Balochistan Assoc. must be looking to get his favored player in the QG team than a talented Balochistan player .
 
Franchise cricket is like football clubs; it doesn't have much to do with regions. Imagine people demanding that Manchester United must sign players born in Manchester lmao.
 
Disappointing from Quetta's management
1. They had the whole year to search for 1 or 2 talented/emerging players from balochistan. Now only due to media pressure will they choose one as the 21st player at the last minute.
2. Could have requested Peshawar to release asghar, with this becoming such a sensitive issue im sure they would have understood.
3. Azam Khan, however talented he is claimed to be, has only played club cricket he does not deserve to b fast tracked into the system only due to his privilege.

But the security situation is also a valid issue there. For now 1 or 2 players in the squad won't hurt the franchise much and they should aim for developing emerging talent as a long term plan and talent hunts (maybe with the help of Pak army,govt. and pcb) with patience from fans as well
 
21st player will be from Balochistan, as per the team's twitter feed.

Things should become subdued a bit I suppose
 
You are making absurd statements since the start.

Many cricketers from East Pakistan region team played for Pakistan like Naseem ul Ghani or Munaf.
Ethnic Bengali who almost made to the side was Roquib ul Hassan, in Dhaka,1969 test series against New Zealand. Aftab Baloch and Asian bradman Zaheer Abbas made intl. debut for the side. Many ethnic Bengali players from Pakistan first class represented Bangladesh like Shafi ul Hassan.

Bangladesh initially favored football, it was Pakistani players like Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis in the 80s who went to their country and generated interest in the game.
[MENTION=141768]GudduBadmash[/MENTION]

Franchises are free to do as they please, there is no rule mandated by the PCB for them to take regional players who they represent. Even the emerging player is not compulsory he should be from the same region he represents.

From all the franchisee, Nadeem Omar is the only person in PSL who has history of financially supporting/backing players from poor background who went onto represent Pakistan e.g. Anwar Ali
Nadeem Omar did'nt take players of his club he took the 3[saud, saad ali, ramiz] of the top 10 performers from the Quaid e Azam trophy who would've been ignored by the rest of franchisee, there is a lack of vision and imposing commercial interest which will be more important in the future. Due to the nepotism from the PCB, where Akmals, Wahab Riaz and Malik are unofficially mandatory, all young talent from Punjab to KPK to Karachi are at a disadvantage and lesser opportunities, Balochistan-residing who are already few in the circuit are further away. Most of the Balochistan-resident players are Pakhtun and very few are ethnic Baloch. Football and boxing are more popular sports amongst the Baloch, cricket comes much later in their priority. The biggest losers in PSL are talented cricketers from KPK.


Balochistan suffers from lot of issues, biggest issue is lack of physical infrastructure which changed just recently with highways built. For a youngster from poor/student background to travel from South Balochistan [Gwadar, Lasbela] to his capital Quetta he has to reach Karachi, Sind first and from there he'll take a road to Quetta, the expensive travel fare makes it impossible for youngster to take the route knowing it is a tough gamble. The cricket structure there is also factionalised like rest of Pakistan meaning every club pushes their own players and do politics. Murad from Balochistan Assoc. must be looking to get his favored player in the QG team than a talented Balochistan player .

I stand corrected..

But the domestic system of the 1960s was the worst we had in our history
No wonder we could not produce any good cricketers that decade
 
Apparently quetta gladiators look like they have the poorest owners... they also look clueless as to their representation of Balochistan.

Another reason is security, there was just another terrorist attack recently and 15 punjabi students killed today.

You can't promote cricket there if there is no place thats safe besides some areas of Quetta.

for your kind information distance from quetta to turbat is 800kms . almost 15 hours drive.
 
Franchise cricket is like football clubs; it doesn't have much to do with regions. Imagine people demanding that Manchester United must sign players born in Manchester lmao.

Completely different dynamics; can't compare the two. The concerns and complaints here legit.
 
Completely different dynamics; can't compare the two. The concerns and complaints here legit.

It's just silly, would you rather have 3 absolutely mediocre players from Islamabad playing for IU instead of deserving cricketers from other cities just to fill up some quota?

Franchise-based sports leagues are the same all over the world, period. Nobody cares if someone born outside New York plays for New York Knicks. This sort of simplicity can only be expected from Pakistanis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't even think of any Balochistan player who's capable of getting into the franchise teams on merit. While the idea of having locals play for the city they are born in is refreshing, you also have to look at the limitations. Quetta does not possess any noteworthy cricketers who can push for a place in the team so are we going to impose a quota system ala what South Africa does with black and colored players? You're going to demean the quality of the league further by imposing this stupid rule. We need merit not quota!!!
 
[MENTION=47617]Red Devil[/MENTION]

Manchester United, New York Knicks and other franchises etc. are apple and oranges comparison if you are relating them to PSL franchises especially teams like Quetta, where geopolitics also play a significant role.

Firstly, unlike the other franchises, PSL teams are not able to play their matches at home. Imagine if Manchester United was established today without any local Manchester player, and they would be playing all their matches in some other country and a few matches in some other city in the UK.

How much support do you think will it garner from the people of Manchester? Not much, since apart from the name, there will be absolutely no connection of the city with the club.

It is almost impossible for the fans to connect with the club if there is no local representation and more importantly, no local matches. If Manchester United and Manchester City were to play their matches in Barcelona instead of Manchester, there will be no real rivalry between the two teams.

On what basis are the people in Balochistan going to support Quetta? Just because they stole the name from their capital?

There are no Balochi players, there are no matches in Quetta, the owners are based in Karachi, and the franchise has made no efforts to promote Balochi culture. This is where Zalmi has done better than other franchises; they have incorporated Pashtun culture deep within the team, and the people of KP can relate to the franchise even if Zalmi wouldn't have had any Pashtun players.

If the owners of Quetta Gladiators had any marketing sense, they would have incorporated some Balochi theme in the logo and used a Balochi name instead of lazily ripping off Kolkata Knight Riders and using the word 'Gladiator', to which the people of Balochistan cannot relate at all.

A Balochi name would have immediately resonated with the public just like the name Zalmi has resonated with the people in KP, and everyone can relate it to irrespective of their social class. Other than the name Quetta, the team is pretty much a second Karachi franchise. From owners to team management, it is Karachi through and through.

Considering the fact that they made a marketing blunder and the fact that they will not be able to play matches in Quetta, having some local Balochi representation would certainly help in promoting the franchise in Balochistan. Adding 2-3 local players will not hamper the chances of the team, and you don't have to play them in every game, but some representation is crucial when you consider the context.

Aspiring cricketers in Balochistan do not have access to the facilities and the opportunities that players in other provinces have, and the PSL is a great platform to bridge that gap. Unfortunately, by trying very hard to be Karachi B, Quetta Gladiators are simply making no efforts to promote the local talent.

People are looking at this very simplistically by arguing that the only thing that matter is winning and local players cannot be given a chance if they aren't good enough. However, there are other important things to consider as well, and if the owners are only interesting in winning and making money, then I believe that the Quetta Cricket Association has made a valid point. If you do not have anything to do with Quetta and Balochistan, by what right are you carrying their name?

It is very easy to say that they are not producing good enough cricketers, but the fact is that they do not have the opportunities and the exposure. In my opinion, Quetta Gladiators do bear some responsibility for developing cricket in that region as long as they are carrying their name.
 
They did hold a trial hunt in Balochistan before PSL 2. Anyone know what became of that?
 
for your kind information distance from quetta to turbat is 800kms . almost 15 hours drive.

I'm not saying that, apologies if you think so. I'm saying generally players and cricketing admin might refrain to go there because they hear on the news the security issues there.
 
Funny how empathy is being used as logic to include Balochistan players into the team rather than merit. Even KK have only 3 or so players in their squad of 21 who are Karachi born which should be a bigger travesty given the talent pool Karachi produces. And those 3 aren't even going to play the PSL. Don't see any furore there.
 
Corridor of Uncertainty;9507795[B said:
]The problem could be solved by mandating atleast 2 mandatory local players in some category such as emerging etc.[/B]

I do sympathize. How will they support Quetta Gladiators made with no local players. Same for other teams.
This is a good rule. Bismillah Khan can easily make any T20 squad on merit but still he was not selected :facepalm: Shame on Sarfraz
 
Franchise based sports league is too democratized of a system for Pakistanis to understand. Giving the teams a free hand is a bad thing and regulating/directing who the teams pick is considered fair and the "right thing to do".

I'll go out on a limb and say the people who put PSL together are actually way ahead of their time but it just might be the wrong product for the wrong crowd.
 
Funny how empathy is being used as logic to include Balochistan players into the team rather than merit. Even KK have only 3 or so players in their squad of 21 who are Karachi born which should be a bigger travesty given the talent pool Karachi produces. And those 3 aren't even going to play the PSL. Don't see any furore there.

Karachi still has a few players in their franchise and they are going to play a few games in Karachi as well. In addition, cricket in Sindh has not been neglected like cricket in Balochistan, and the Balochi people are not going to see their team playing in Quetta. That's a luxury only Lahore and Karachi can enjoy for now.
 
Next time I should enter a company and demand them to include me in the workforce because I'm from Karachi regardless of my skills.
 
Franchise based sports league is too democratized of a system for Pakistanis to understand. Giving the teams a free hand is a bad thing and regulating/directing who the teams pick is considered fair and the "right thing to do".

I'll go out on a limb and say the people who put PSL together are actually way ahead of their time but it just might be the wrong product for the wrong crowd.

Actually it is the other way round. Some people in Pakistan have a better understanding of how things work here, and how a generic franchised based sports league will not work in Pakistan considering the fact that they are not going to play their matches at home.

That is the biggest hurdle, more so than the lack of local representation. If the Gladiators were playing their matches in Quetta, there wouldn't have been an uproar even if they wouldn't have had any local representation.

People in Quetta won't get to see the games at home, there is no local representation and no gimmick to which the fans can relate to. On what basis are the Balochi people going to support the team? I gave the example of Manchester United few posts earlier. If it was to be established today in a different country with no local representation, how much support would it garner from the people in Manchester?

This was something that was also going to happen one way or the other, and this is where the marketeers at Zalmi were smart enough to 'localize' the franchise in terms of branding and image. Which is why the Zalmi franchise is relatable to people in KP even if it doesn't have any local representation anymore.

Their counterparts hired by Omar Associates were lousy enough to not incorporate a Balochi theme and ended up copying Kolkata Knight Riders and adopting the name 'Gladiator'. A Marketing dropout can do a better job than that.
 
Actually it is the other way round. Some people in Pakistan have a better understanding of how things work here, and how a generic franchised based sports league will not work in Pakistan considering the fact that they are not going to play their matches at home.

That is the biggest hurdle, more so than the lack of local representation. If the Gladiators were playing their matches in Quetta, there wouldn't have been an uproar even if they wouldn't have had any local representation.

People in Quetta won't get to see the games at home, there is no local representation and no gimmick to which the fans can relate to. On what basis are the Balochi people going to support the team? I gave the example of Manchester United few posts earlier. If it was to be established today in a different country with no local representation, how much support would it garner from the people in Manchester?

This was something that was also going to happen one way or the other, and this is where the marketeers at Zalmi were smart enough to 'localize' the franchise in terms of branding and image. Which is why the Zalmi franchise is relatable to people in KP even if it doesn't have any local representation anymore.

Their counterparts hired by Omar Associates were lousy enough to not incorporate a Balochi theme and ended up copying Kolkata Knight Riders and adopting the name 'Gladiator'. A Marketing dropout can do a better job than that.

The issue of getting the local fans to support or connect with their respective cities can be solved in other ways. Zalmi is an example you mentioned. I don't see a need to regulate the teams picks...it defeats the purpose of a franchise system. It's an oxymoron.

You might think I lack empathy or this is a simple way of thinking but putting a regional quota on teams will eventually turn PSL in to a two tiered league. This open selection actually evens out the playing field between the expensive franchises and the less expensive ones like is the case with QG.

There can be a push for teams to adopt a local home base or play games in their cities (even if it's the talent hunt games we see LQ doing). The issue with Quetta is unique...they don't have grounds, no great players, and security is a big concern. Team owner of QG was actually complaining how they could not go to the parts outside of Quetta due to security issues during their "talent hunt".

The onus is on the PCB to provide Baloch players a chance and to improve cricket infrastructure in the province. This is not the job PSL or PSL franchises should be doing.
 
I just can't believe that there isn't a single player better then Azam khan in Balochistan.
 
[MENTION=47617]Red Devil[/MENTION]

Manchester United, New York Knicks and other franchises etc. are apple and oranges comparison if you are relating them to PSL franchises especially teams like Quetta, where geopolitics also play a significant role.

Firstly, unlike the other franchises, PSL teams are not able to play their matches at home. Imagine if Manchester United was established today without any local Manchester player, and they would be playing all their matches in some other country and a few matches in some other city in the UK.

How much support do you think will it garner from the people of Manchester? Not much, since apart from the name, there will be absolutely no connection of the city with the club.

It is almost impossible for the fans to connect with the club if there is no local representation and more importantly, no local matches. If Manchester United and Manchester City were to play their matches in Barcelona instead of Manchester, there will be no real rivalry between the two teams.

On what basis are the people in Balochistan going to support Quetta? Just because they stole the name from their capital?

There are no Balochi players, there are no matches in Quetta, the owners are based in Karachi, and the franchise has made no efforts to promote Balochi culture. This is where Zalmi has done better than other franchises; they have incorporated Pashtun culture deep within the team, and the people of KP can relate to the franchise even if Zalmi wouldn't have had any Pashtun players.

If the owners of Quetta Gladiators had any marketing sense, they would have incorporated some Balochi theme in the logo and used a Balochi name instead of lazily ripping off Kolkata Knight Riders and using the word 'Gladiator', to which the people of Balochistan cannot relate at all.

A Balochi name would have immediately resonated with the public just like the name Zalmi has resonated with the people in KP, and everyone can relate it to irrespective of their social class. Other than the name Quetta, the team is pretty much a second Karachi franchise. From owners to team management, it is Karachi through and through.

Considering the fact that they made a marketing blunder and the fact that they will not be able to play matches in Quetta, having some local Balochi representation would certainly help in promoting the franchise in Balochistan. Adding 2-3 local players will not hamper the chances of the team, and you don't have to play them in every game, but some representation is crucial when you consider the context.

Aspiring cricketers in Balochistan do not have access to the facilities and the opportunities that players in other provinces have, and the PSL is a great platform to bridge that gap. Unfortunately, by trying very hard to be Karachi B, Quetta Gladiators are simply making no efforts to promote the local talent.

People are looking at this very simplistically by arguing that the only thing that matter is winning and local players cannot be given a chance if they aren't good enough. However, there are other important things to consider as well, and if the owners are only interesting in winning and making money, then I believe that the Quetta Cricket Association has made a valid point. If you do not have anything to do with Quetta and Balochistan, by what right are you carrying their name?

It is very easy to say that they are not producing good enough cricketers, but the fact is that they do not have the opportunities and the exposure. In my opinion, Quetta Gladiators do bear some responsibility for developing cricket in that region as long as they are carrying their name.

Not being able to play at home obviously presents a big problem to the entire league but hopefully that won't be an issue in the long run. Thing is, Quetta isn't the only team that doesn't have local players. Islamabad, Peshawar and even Multan barely have any local players. It's a franchise-based league, that's just how it works.

However, there's no restriction on the franchises if they want to pick local players for marketing reasons. And I can see where you're coming from; wouldn't mind if Quetta pick a couple of local players for marketing purposes.

I just think it shouldn't be mandatory. Quota systems are never a good idea and deserving talent invariably gets the short end of the stick.
 
In theory, it would be far better for every Region to have players from the region in the squad IF they replace the undeserving average players that are in every team.

However the reality is that if they are forced to pick a set number from their region, these will be at the expense of deserving younger players. For example, for Quetta, replacing Shafiq with a young local Quetta batsman would be great for Pakistan and for the area, however what will happen is that the local person will replace Saad Ali or Saud Shakeel and results in the best possible players not being on show due to a quota system. Plus hinders the development of a potential talent.

For that reason, in practicality, a quota is not the way.
 
People do demand that. Which is why football clubs invest heavily in setting up academies. Marcus Rashford and Danny Welbeck are two recent examples of local lads that were developed by Manchester United. Both went on to represent England.
 
Bad PR from the owners and PCB. With nationalism on the rise because of mismanagement and corruption by the local and national parties, the last thing you need is more perceived injustices.
 
If it was up to me, there should be a rule wherein at least 3 players should from the squad should be born in the city of the PSL franchise.

Excellent suggestion . Particularly local talent must be included in QG team . Baluchistan is already deprived region , so by not including local players we are adding fuel to the fire .PCB should take care of this matter in the greater perspective.
 
The PSL franchises instead of wasting millions on some foreign players and coaches should invest that money on local facilities and local cricketers via talent hunts in the region they represent.

In addition how about investing money in local schools cricket in the region that the franchise represents.
 
Bad PR from the owners and PCB. With nationalism on the rise because of mismanagement and corruption by the local and national parties, the last thing you need is more perceived injustices.

Very well articulated!

Unfortunately most posters cannot see the forest for the trees. It's disappointing to see that we are unable to consider such an important aspect. The issues we as a nation are faced with aren't trivial and it sure isn't how things all around the world work but it is a ground reality which deserves proper consideration.

It's a fact that Cricket is one of the few common denominator with the ability to capture the interest of our nation. It would be just plain stupidity form us to treat our cricket league as just another league, especially when the teams are marketed to be representing various regions which differ vastly from each other in terms of development and local population.
 
Funny how empathy is being used as logic to include Balochistan players into the team rather than merit. Even KK have only 3 or so players in their squad of 21 who are Karachi born which should be a bigger travesty given the talent pool Karachi produces. And those 3 aren't even going to play the PSL. Don't see any furore there.

Can you for once not think about your own self-interest and be willing to care for the sentiments of those who are less well off and are heavily underrepresented?

While growing up as a kid in a city in Punjab, which wasn't Lahore, as a 100% punjabi and belonging to the majority ethnic group of Pakistan, I was always curious about the other ethnicities and people with different cultural background than me, residing beside me in my beautiful country. In particular, I do remember being fond of the nation's biggest city so far in the south right next to the sea. As far as I can remember nobody in my surrounding taught me to differentiate between people from different background or taught me the virtues of regional bias. Hence this sort of thinking is totally alien to me and it is possible that I am amongst the minority in this regard.

I am sharing my personal information to let you know how insulting and inconsiderate your post come across to me. I am completely alien to this Karachi vs Lahore fight but since I have been on this forum, I have learnt that such a thing exists. It might be banter, light joking, whatever and it can have its place and time. However this posts of yours on this topic, where you are uselessly playing the victim card, makes me think that perhaps there is indeed some sort of a complex involved behind such a thinking. Before you just sarcastically play down the issue and ridicule it to the extreme, I want you to be a bit considerate and look at the bigger picture. I want you to consider whether you want Pakistan Super League to be something that unites the nation rather than divides it.

Look closely and you will see that originally the discussion was started in a much broader sense. In another thread the issue was raised about including a local player from the same region as the team's name. Yes, Quetta Gladiators is indeed the team discussed most commonly but that's only because it represents the most extreme case. However the motivation behind the discussion was not to solely promote players from Balochistan. At least I did not take part in the discussion with this as my motivation.

My personal suggestion was to make it mandatory for each team, to have at least one local player, who is young and upcoming, in the SQUAD and not necessarily in the playing XI. This also implies more Karachi player in Karachi Kings team. Here I want to make it clear that this is only my suggestion. Another or better idea can be implemented instead, I don't mind, as long as it guarantees that the team would have some kind of association with the region it is named after, so that the people of the region would be motivated to invest and root for their team.

This is not Europe or the US. You can't look at leagues all around the world and wish to copy paste the same formula while hoping for big success. That would be foolish. This is Pakistan, our country which has its own unique market and if you truly want the league to be successful in the long term and you truly want it to be a league which is followed in different regions and by the whole nation then you can not overlook this important aspect. It's already obvious that the teams were initially named after different regions to get the fan following going. But you cannot foolishly name the teams after different regions without considering the sentiments of the people and expect it to successful. This is short term thinking. You cannot expect to create a fan following of the different cities by the local population out of thin air. Previously I pointed out that without considering the sentiments of the local population you are only going to alienate them from their team and here you have it the cricket associations of Balochistan is already starting to express their discontent.

If you as a franchise ignore the sentiments of the local population, especially in regards to QG, you will lose a vast majority of your potential source of income. You will end up with only a handful of fans spread across the country who are only supporting you because their favorite player is in your team, the moment their favorite players goes their loyalty goes.

I am focused on the long term success and firmly believe that if we are able to keep this league alive for next few years and are able to keep the local population of various regions engaged then down the road people would eventually stop caring whether a player from Balochistan is playing in QG or not, because people would have already been emotionally invested in the team over the years. The problem is right now there is almost zero emotional investment by the local population in your brand, since the initial interest of having a team named after their region is fading away, due to a lack of any meaningful connection with the team.

I also want to address the general sentiment that if their was local talent then QG would have selected it. In the 2016 edition a kid from Balochistan, Bismillah Khan was part of the QG squad. In the last game of the group stage QG decided to give him a chance. While chasing a target of 200+ runs he opened the innings and scored 55 runs off 30 balls 10 4s and one six at a SR of 183+. QG successfully chased down the target. Bismilliah Khan was his team's highest run scorer and was awarded the MOM. In his next two games he scored 0. So you could say two consecutive failures. In the 2017 edition he was selected as a supplementary player and never got to play a single game. Basically you could say he was downgraded and now here we are in the 2018 edition he has been dropped as a player though I did read about some lame excuses of him still being the team's ambassador and all that. The kid is a cricketer and wants to play, you cant just have him as your mascot and think you fooled the people.

There you have it, a typical example of how someone form a weak background who has no source of support, is treated. The guy did absolutely nothing wrong to be dropped or to not be given a proper chance again. It's a t20 game, two consecutive ducks aren't something unheard off. It's not just about him specifically, it is about what kind of a message we are giving to the rest of the upcoming local kids who are watching all this closely, when we allow and tolerate such kind of treatment. What do we expect when there is no proper regulation to prevent such things from happening and give support to those with lesser means. If there is no proper incentive and no real structure through which someone with determination and willpower can become successful than no wonder you don't see new faces. What's the use of pushing myself and working hard when it wont be recognized? When despite a match winning performance and a promising start a local kid is not selected in a 21 man squad then of course there will be resentment and anger.

The name Bismillah Khan might me new to our ears and we might have to look at old scoreboards to realize the kid scored 50+ runs in his first match but you can be sure that over there in Quetta he is every kids hero and they remember his knock as if he had played it yesterday. Now imagine those kids feelings upon finding out he is dropped from the squad, would they really be motivated to pursue a career in cricket themselves?
 
The PSL franchises instead of wasting millions on some foreign players and coaches should invest that money on local facilities and local cricketers via talent hunts in the region they represent.

In addition how about investing money in local schools cricket in the region that the franchise represents.

Instead logic doesn't apply here. PSL need foreign players to make it successful.
 
Instead logic doesn't apply here. PSL need foreign players to make it successful.

Where did I say not to have foreign players at all?

There needs to be some support for local home-grown talent from the areas of each of the franchises. It's not just about the foreign players who frankly are mainly just there for the money.
 
Can you for once not think about your own self-interest and be willing to care for the sentiments of those who are less well off and are heavily underrepresented?

While growing up as a kid in a city in Punjab, which wasn't Lahore, as a 100% punjabi and belonging to the majority ethnic group of Pakistan, I was always curious about the other ethnicities and people with different cultural background than me, residing beside me in my beautiful country. In particular, I do remember being fond of the nation's biggest city so far in the south right next to the sea. As far as I can remember nobody in my surrounding taught me to differentiate between people from different background or taught me the virtues of regional bias. Hence this sort of thinking is totally alien to me and it is possible that I am amongst the minority in this regard.

I am sharing my personal information to let you know how insulting and inconsiderate your post come across to me. I am completely alien to this Karachi vs Lahore fight but since I have been on this forum, I have learnt that such a thing exists. It might be banter, light joking, whatever and it can have its place and time. However this posts of yours on this topic, where you are uselessly playing the victim card, makes me think that perhaps there is indeed some sort of a complex involved behind such a thinking. Before you just sarcastically play down the issue and ridicule it to the extreme, I want you to be a bit considerate and look at the bigger picture. I want you to consider whether you want Pakistan Super League to be something that unites the nation rather than divides it.

Look closely and you will see that originally the discussion was started in a much broader sense. In another thread the issue was raised about including a local player from the same region as the team's name. Yes, Quetta Gladiators is indeed the team discussed most commonly but that's only because it represents the most extreme case. However the motivation behind the discussion was not to solely promote players from Balochistan. At least I did not take part in the discussion with this as my motivation.

My personal suggestion was to make it mandatory for each team, to have at least one local player, who is young and upcoming, in the SQUAD and not necessarily in the playing XI. This also implies more Karachi player in Karachi Kings team. Here I want to make it clear that this is only my suggestion. Another or better idea can be implemented instead, I don't mind, as long as it guarantees that the team would have some kind of association with the region it is named after, so that the people of the region would be motivated to invest and root for their team.

This is not Europe or the US. You can't look at leagues all around the world and wish to copy paste the same formula while hoping for big success. That would be foolish. This is Pakistan, our country which has its own unique market and if you truly want the league to be successful in the long term and you truly want it to be a league which is followed in different regions and by the whole nation then you can not overlook this important aspect. It's already obvious that the teams were initially named after different regions to get the fan following going. But you cannot foolishly name the teams after different regions without considering the sentiments of the people and expect it to successful. This is short term thinking. You cannot expect to create a fan following of the different cities by the local population out of thin air. Previously I pointed out that without considering the sentiments of the local population you are only going to alienate them from their team and here you have it the cricket associations of Balochistan is already starting to express their discontent.

If you as a franchise ignore the sentiments of the local population, especially in regards to QG, you will lose a vast majority of your potential source of income. You will end up with only a handful of fans spread across the country who are only supporting you because their favorite player is in your team, the moment their favorite players goes their loyalty goes.

I am focused on the long term success and firmly believe that if we are able to keep this league alive for next few years and are able to keep the local population of various regions engaged then down the road people would eventually stop caring whether a player from Balochistan is playing in QG or not, because people would have already been emotionally invested in the team over the years. The problem is right now there is almost zero emotional investment by the local population in your brand, since the initial interest of having a team named after their region is fading away, due to a lack of any meaningful connection with the team.

I also want to address the general sentiment that if their was local talent then QG would have selected it. In the 2016 edition a kid from Balochistan, Bismillah Khan was part of the QG squad. In the last game of the group stage QG decided to give him a chance. While chasing a target of 200+ runs he opened the innings and scored 55 runs off 30 balls 10 4s and one six at a SR of 183+. QG successfully chased down the target. Bismilliah Khan was his team's highest run scorer and was awarded the MOM. In his next two games he scored 0. So you could say two consecutive failures. In the 2017 edition he was selected as a supplementary player and never got to play a single game. Basically you could say he was downgraded and now here we are in the 2018 edition he has been dropped as a player though I did read about some lame excuses of him still being the team's ambassador and all that. The kid is a cricketer and wants to play, you cant just have him as your mascot and think you fooled the people.

There you have it, a typical example of how someone form a weak background who has no source of support, is treated. The guy did absolutely nothing wrong to be dropped or to not be given a proper chance again. It's a t20 game, two consecutive ducks aren't something unheard off. It's not just about him specifically, it is about what kind of a message we are giving to the rest of the upcoming local kids who are watching all this closely, when we allow and tolerate such kind of treatment. What do we expect when there is no proper regulation to prevent such things from happening and give support to those with lesser means. If there is no proper incentive and no real structure through which someone with determination and willpower can become successful than no wonder you don't see new faces. What's the use of pushing myself and working hard when it wont be recognized? When despite a match winning performance and a promising start a local kid is not selected in a 21 man squad then of course there will be resentment and anger.

The name Bismillah Khan might me new to our ears and we might have to look at old scoreboards to realize the kid scored 50+ runs in his first match but you can be sure that over there in Quetta he is every kids hero and they remember his knock as if he had played it yesterday. Now imagine those kids feelings upon finding out he is dropped from the squad, would they really be motivated to pursue a career in cricket themselves?

I don't know what part of my post did you find insulting? Did you find it insulting for me to prefer merit over quota? Or did you find it insulting for me to mention that Karachi Kings also does not have many Karachi born players in its team but everyone is focused on Quetta?

What I understand from your post is that you feel insulted that Quetta gladiators has not picked a single Quetta based player in its team. And on top of that you felt insulted because of my post saying that empathy should not be used to induct players in the team.

Firstly, I stand by what I said. And I will say it again. No to quota system. Yes to merit. If we have 11 great Balochistan players, I would like to have all 11 of them in the Pakistan national team. But if we have none, I would have precisely 0 players in the playing team. I would not sacrifice merit over some quota system that forcibly allows someone to be a part of the team if there are better deserving players in the pecking order. I do not want us to go the way of South Africa who makes its mandatory for the national team to have some black and colored players.

Secondly, Balochistan may be less well off and severely underrepresented in the Pakistan cricketing fraternity but that is because the regional cricket association and the PCB never played its part to develop cricket in that region. The fault lies with those organizations. The fault does not lie with the owners of the Quetta Gladiators franchise who decided not to pick any Baloch player in its squad because there was no great talent available to select. I would love it for you to provide me a list of how many Balochistan players were available to pick in the draft in the first place from the total list of 501 players.

Which brings me to the point of Bismillah Khan. To be honest he's got a quiet mediocre domestic record but for arguments sake lets say he deserved a chance to play the PSL. Please tell me why is it the prerogative of only the Quetta Gladiators franchise to pick him? Why aren't the 5 other franchises picking him for their team? The answer is simple. None of the teams think he deserved a spot in their squad. Hard luck. Khurram Manzoor wasn't selected in the first two PSLs either. That's how it goes. Now are you suggesting that Bismillah is better than Khurram? It's up to Bismillah Khan to prove that he deserved a call up to the PSL by scoring heavily in the domestic setup.

Thirdly, stop this culture of telling who's less well off and who's not. I know you didn't mean it that way but by labeling Balochistan as less well off, you are not helping their cause one bit. You are indirectly lowering their self esteem. By indirectly alluding that Bismillah is less well off and demanding his inclusion in the team just because he's from Quetta and that Quetta Franchise needs to have him, you are unconsciously perpetuating the demarcation of classes. Let him know that he's going to be treated just like the others i.e. if you perform well in the domestic, you'll be selected. Not tell him that you should be selected just because of your ethnicity and geography. And you talk about emotions and feelings. Imagine the emotions and feelings of that cricketer who scores in the domestic and is a superior player by all means than the local player, but gets bypassed for selection just because a franchise needs to have a local player in its team. What justice is that?

Lastly, I just want to say, that I am all for regional development but franchises have no obligation to play that role which should be PCBs and the Regional Cricket Association's in the first place. Franchises will pick who they believe is the best talent from the country. That's not wrong because they are not non-profit enterprises. Yet if they do, hats off to them.

Here's a fun fact for everyone. Rajashthan Royals had precisely 0 players from Rajasthan in its squad from 2008-2010.
 
[MENTION=135134]CricketAnalyst[/MENTION]

The main issue here is the fact that people of Quetta/Balochistan do not have anything to support the team for. Apart from stealing their city's name, the franchise has absolutely nothing to do with the region.

No local players, no branding, no local ownership and they will probably never see the team play in their home ground. Teams like Lahore and Karachi will play many games at home, the likes of Islamabad and Multan have some local representation, and Zalmi has been very smart with the way they have localized the brand.

If Quetta Gladiators would have been playing in Quetta, there would have been no (or very little) uproar on the lack of local representation. The fans would still support the team.

Rajasthan Royals didn't have local players but they still played their home matches in Jaipur. Do you think the region would have been able to connect with the team if they were playing all their matches in Dubai and a couple of other cities in India?

Certainly not, and the only way of attracting the fan base would have been to promote some local talent.
 
[MENTION=135134]CricketAnalyst[/MENTION]

The main issue here is the fact that people of Quetta/Balochistan do not have anything to support the team for. Apart from stealing their city's name, the franchise has absolutely nothing to do with the region.

No local players, no branding, no local ownership and they will probably never see the team play in their home ground. Teams like Lahore and Karachi will play many games at home, the likes of Islamabad and Multan have some local representation, and Zalmi has been very smart with the way they have localized the brand.

If Quetta Gladiators would have been playing in Quetta, there would have been no (or very little) uproar on the lack of local representation. The fans would still support the team.

Rajasthan Royals didn't have local players but they still played their home matches in Jaipur. Do you think the region would have been able to connect with the team if they were playing all their matches in Dubai and a couple of other cities in India?

Certainly not, and the only way of attracting the fan base would have been to promote some local talent.

As long as sarfaraz keeps selecting his buddies and supporting nepotism then this team will have 0 fans from anywhere
 
Back
Top