What's new

Chat GPT and artificial intelligence

I did my bachelor's in business. After that, I decided to go into IT field and finished a 2-year diploma in computer programming. However, I didn't enjoy/do well with my software development career and I have been doing clerical jobs since then.

I have recently become interested in AI field. I feel like it is something I enjoy. How do you propose I approach it based on my background? ChatGPT gave me a roadmap but I would love to know what you and/or other IT professionals think.

:inti
I think the roadmap you shared is pretty good..but it ends where you are ready to be a data scientist although you will need some more stats background and SQL/ pyspark stuff for practical reasons. However MLE is more akin to a SWE and would need additional deployment skill sets and application building stuff. LLM engineer requires some additional skills which are also applied and easy to figure out. Not sure where you are located but SWE Is undergoing big changes and jobs might be lost or evolve...if you are willing to put the hard work..I would suggest get a online masters degree from OMSCS Georgia Tech and at the same time try to join some entry level job where you can build your experience. The latter is easier said than done but what you can do is try to become a data scientist focusing on business or finance..which is your domain and them build you software engineering chops. Hard to get a job nowadays without a degree due to layoffs AI etc. gone are the old days
 
@straighttalk Perplexity is a wrapper yes but its also one of the first business use cases that would be helpful for various educational fields with its ability to use multiple models.

On aspects like Langraph, MemGPT etc at least as an Integration person that’s why my current focus is.. but its still continuously improving field with every 6 months an improvement in MemoryOS for AI, just last week a Chinese university launched something that was better than Memgpt, Zap.

On security , which definitely is required and will make enterprise ready AI agents , seeing various “Control” Towers that have already come in the picture.
Yup agree with your last two points..
For the perplexity case I accept they were the first but I feel their technology has no moat or uniqueness..Google can easily do something better and so can open ai...these are easy things to do which Salesforce service now and IBM with deep enterprise roots will win and consumer market is fragmented. These companies are the first to go down when the bubble bursts.
 
Yup agree with your last two points..
For the perplexity case I accept they were the first but I feel their technology has no moat or uniqueness..Google can easily do something better and so can open ai...these are easy things to do which Salesforce service now and IBM with deep enterprise roots will win and consumer market is fragmented. These companies are the first to go down when the bubble bursts.
My assumption is they will be acquired, Apple, Salesforce etc might as well acquire them as they have done something that will be hard to make from bottom up.
Already rumours that Apple will try
 
I think the roadmap you shared is pretty good..but it ends where you are ready to be a data scientist although you will need some more stats background and SQL/ pyspark stuff for practical reasons. However MLE is more akin to a SWE and would need additional deployment skill sets and application building stuff. LLM engineer requires some additional skills which are also applied and easy to figure out. Not sure where you are located but SWE Is undergoing big changes and jobs might be lost or evolve...if you are willing to put the hard work..I would suggest get a online masters degree from OMSCS Georgia Tech and at the same time try to join some entry level job where you can build your experience. The latter is easier said than done but what you can do is try to become a data scientist focusing on business or finance..which is your domain and them build you software engineering chops. Hard to get a job nowadays without a degree due to layoffs AI etc. gone are the old days

Thanks.

I am based in Toronto, Canada.
 
What's stopping you guys from building a great AI company.

We have now seen many examples in last few years of startups of AI making it big and this is just the beginning.

So I'm just curious. What's stopping you?
 
What's stopping you guys from building a great AI company.

We have now seen many examples in last few years of startups of AI making it big and this is just the beginning.

So I'm just curious. What's stopping you?
Which AI startup has made it big except Perplexity?
Also AI company can’t be made by one person unless you are solving an AI problem.

Even newer companies like ZepAI has Y combinator backing, Letta has UC Berkley backing with solid Scientific paper foundation, not seeing anyone here having that level of Intellectual capacity except @Sachin136 maybe
 
I asked ChatGPT, "How much energy does ChatGPT consume per query?" :inti

Here was ChatGPT's answer:

====================================

Great question — and the answer varies depending on the type of model, infrastructure, and complexity of the query. Here’s a general breakdown of how much energy is used per AI query, using public estimates and research:

⚡ Estimated Energy Usage per Query (as of 2024–2025)

Model TypeEnergy per Query (Estimated)Notes
GPT-3 (175B)~0.5 Wh per queryDepending on prompt length and hardware used
GPT-4 / GPT-4-turbo~0.8–1.5 Wh per queryHigher accuracy and complexity = more compute
ChatGPT Average~0.3–1 Wh per queryVaries widely by prompt size and infrastructure
Search Engine (Google)~0.0003 Wh per queryMuch lower due to efficiency and simplicity

🔋 To Put That in Perspective:​

  • 1 Wh (Watt-hour) = The energy needed to power a 1-watt device for 1 hour.
  • Typical LED light bulb uses ~10W = 1 Wh every 6 minutes.
  • So one ChatGPT querycould use the same energy as:
    • Running an LED light for a few minutes
    • Charging your phone a small percentage
    • Boiling water for a single cup of tea (depending on the model)

🌍 Environmental Context​

  • OpenAI and other AI companies are increasingly optimizing model efficiency.
  • Work is ongoing to reduce carbon emissions through:
    • Efficient hardware (e.g., custom AI chips like NVIDIA A100s, Google TPUs)
    • Green data centers powered by renewable energy
    • Model compression and pruning

📌 In Summary:​

  • A typical ChatGPT query uses 0.3 to 1.5 Wh, depending on model complexity.
  • It's more than a Google search, but far less than watching a video or gaming.
  • The overall impact adds up with scale (millions/billions of queries).

==============================================

I then asked ChatGPT, "So, should I refrain from unnecessary queries? To save energy?" :inti

ChatGPT replied:

============================

That’s a thoughtful and responsible question — and the short answer is:

✅ Yes, being mindful of unnecessary queries can help reduce energy use — especially when done at scale — but you don't need to feel guilty for using ChatGPT responsibly.

🌍 Why It Matters
Each query, especially with large AI models like GPT-4, uses significantly more energy than a basic Google search.

At a global scale, this adds up — millions of queries per day means millions of watt-hours, much of which still comes from non-renewable sources.

Like all tech use (streaming, gaming, scrolling), there’s an environmental cost.

🧭 What You Can Do (Without Overthinking It)
You don’t need to stop using ChatGPT, but you can make choices that balance your goals with sustainability:

Be Conscious, Not Obsessive:
✅ Combine multiple questions into one when possible.

✅ Avoid “just for fun” queries if they don’t actually add value for you.

✅ Use lightweight resources (books, local docs, offline tools) when you can.

But Also:
❌ Don’t stress about every single query.

❌ Don’t replace useful AI guidance with low-quality or high-stress alternatives.

🌱 Bonus: Using AI to Reduce Waste

So in short:

Yes, be thoughtful — but don’t let it paralyze you. Smart, focused queries are exactly what AI should be used for.

Let me know if you want tips on digital sustainability or how to use AI to live more eco-consciously.
 
Yes never waste by saying — Thank you , Hi., greetings to GPT , it’s extremely resource intensive.

Directly fire questions only or ask queries
 
Yes never waste by saying — Thank you , Hi., greetings to GPT , it’s extremely resource intensive.

Directly fire questions only or ask queries

Yes. It wastes energy. I didn't know this or care about this. Learned about it recently.

I used to say good morning and good night to ChatGPT regularly. LOL.

Anyway, I want to be query-efficient moving forward. I don't want to waste energy for no reason. :inti
 
Yes never waste by saying — Thank you , Hi., greetings to GPT , it’s extremely resource intensive.

Directly fire questions only or ask queries
These don't consume a lot of energy. Most modern applications have caching built in. So if the query is the same as asked by others and the answer doesn't depend on context chatgpt will simply return the cached response. It won't go to the model which is the computationally intensive part
 
Yes. It wastes energy. I didn't know this or care about this. Learned about it recently.

I used to say good morning and good night to ChatGPT regularly. LOL.

Anyway, I want to be query-efficient moving forward. I don't want to waste energy for no reason. :inti
It got ignored in the news but OpenAI had said it not to do that, Next time I’ll post such news on this thread
 
Standalone hi hello messages won't even reach the model and will be filtered out.

If this is part of the query then that adds to the number of tokens being processed and probably adds to the cost in the aggregate but this will be a miniscule in the grand scheme of things.

So if your query is hi, can you please write me a complex program to do x, y and z, the first part of the sentence does have tokens that need to be processed but it will be very small. The bulk of the computational power will be used to process the relevant query.

I'm sure Google spends millions processing such words for its search engine. But it spends billions for the useful parts of the search engine crawling the Web and associating the keywords to Web pages
 
Standalone hi hello messages won't even reach the model and will be filtered out.

If this is part of the query then that adds to the number of tokens being processed and probably adds to the cost in the aggregate but this will be a miniscule in the grand scheme of things.

So if your query is hi, can you please write me a complex program to do x, y and z, the first part of the sentence does have tokens that need to be processed but it will be very small. The bulk of the computational power will be used to process the relevant query.

I'm sure Google spends millions processing such words for its search engine. But it spends billions for the useful parts of the search engine crawling the Web and associating the keywords to Web pages
As I said it depends upon context, but its entirely useless to do so esp if its above 2 words, the problem is this - when multiple do this, like those terrible whatsapp morning forwards, now imagine it being worse

Just me or you doing it wouldnt cause a dent but it does when thousands do it let alone millions.
 

“AI will replace…” Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas says this profession will vanish in 6 months​

Srinivas says Comet can, for example, find engineers from Stanford who’ve worked at top AI companies, collect their LinkedIn profiles, grab contact details, and even send personalised emails all without any human input.​


The future of some jobs might be on a ticking clock, six months to be exact. Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity AI, believes recruiters may soon be history, thanks to the rapid rise of AI tools.

In a recent chat on The Verge’s Decoder podcast, Srinivas made a bold claim: “A recruiter’s work worth one week is just one prompt.” He says AI is no longer about helping humans with small tasks—it’s getting ready to completely take over full workflows.

At the heart of this change is Perplexity’s new AI browser, Comet. It’s not just a smarter search engine, but what Srinivas calls a proper “AI agent”, a tool that can take instructions, process information, and complete tasks from start to finish, all on its own.

According to him, recruiters will be among the first to feel the impact. Why? Because most of their work—sourcing candidates, reaching out to people, scheduling interviews can be done much faster by AI. Srinivas says Comet can, for example, find engineers from Stanford who’ve worked at top AI companies, collect their LinkedIn profiles, grab contact details, and even send personalised emails all without any human input.

 

“AI will replace…” Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas says this profession will vanish in 6 months​

Srinivas says Comet can, for example, find engineers from Stanford who’ve worked at top AI companies, collect their LinkedIn profiles, grab contact details, and even send personalised emails all without any human input.​


The future of some jobs might be on a ticking clock, six months to be exact. Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity AI, believes recruiters may soon be history, thanks to the rapid rise of AI tools.

In a recent chat on The Verge’s Decoder podcast, Srinivas made a bold claim: “A recruiter’s work worth one week is just one prompt.” He says AI is no longer about helping humans with small tasks—it’s getting ready to completely take over full workflows.

At the heart of this change is Perplexity’s new AI browser, Comet. It’s not just a smarter search engine, but what Srinivas calls a proper “AI agent”, a tool that can take instructions, process information, and complete tasks from start to finish, all on its own.

According to him, recruiters will be among the first to feel the impact. Why? Because most of their work—sourcing candidates, reaching out to people, scheduling interviews can be done much faster by AI. Srinivas says Comet can, for example, find engineers from Stanford who’ve worked at top AI companies, collect their LinkedIn profiles, grab contact details, and even send personalised emails all without any human input.

Excellent research bro, thank you for sharing as always.
 

“AI will replace…” Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas says this profession will vanish in 6 months​

Srinivas says Comet can, for example, find engineers from Stanford who’ve worked at top AI companies, collect their LinkedIn profiles, grab contact details, and even send personalised emails all without any human input.​


The future of some jobs might be on a ticking clock, six months to be exact. Aravind Srinivas, CEO of Perplexity AI, believes recruiters may soon be history, thanks to the rapid rise of AI tools.

In a recent chat on The Verge’s Decoder podcast, Srinivas made a bold claim: “A recruiter’s work worth one week is just one prompt.” He says AI is no longer about helping humans with small tasks—it’s getting ready to completely take over full workflows.

At the heart of this change is Perplexity’s new AI browser, Comet. It’s not just a smarter search engine, but what Srinivas calls a proper “AI agent”, a tool that can take instructions, process information, and complete tasks from start to finish, all on its own.

According to him, recruiters will be among the first to feel the impact. Why? Because most of their work—sourcing candidates, reaching out to people, scheduling interviews can be done much faster by AI. Srinivas says Comet can, for example, find engineers from Stanford who’ve worked at top AI companies, collect their LinkedIn profiles, grab contact details, and even send personalised emails all without any human input.

All these Ceos are so annoying , they are behaving like know it all with a messiah syndrome, I’m almost 37, and I’m more annoyed by people of my generation and older than with the younger generation as these tech bros just talk and talk.
I hate the startup Blore scene in India as well, can’t believe I’m saying this but I prefer Delhi NCR, Gujarat, Mumbai startup over the B’lore ones.
 
@sweep_shot I have been using Claude(Sonnet) for last one week to learn about something for my future work, have to say in terms of education as a tutor on deeper "educational" topics it edges out GPT for me right now.

Give it a try esp if you are trying to learn something on work, example if you are in insurance domain, getting detailed education on that, I'm doing healthcare and manufacturing standards right now, and something that would had taken a long time ,with a lot of reading for me was so much faster using claude.

One has to be mindful though , I don't think it can give life perspectives like GPT, but i haven't explored that.
 
@sweep_shot I have been using Claude(Sonnet) for last one week to learn about something for my future work, have to say in terms of education as a tutor on deeper "educational" topics it edges out GPT for me right now.

Give it a try esp if you are trying to learn something on work, example if you are in insurance domain, getting detailed education on that, I'm doing healthcare and manufacturing standards right now, and something that would had taken a long time ,with a lot of reading for me was so much faster using claude.

One has to be mindful though , I don't think it can give life perspectives like GPT, but i haven't explored that.

Thanks. I may try it.

I have heard of Claude but never used it.

I have only used ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini thus far.
 

OpenAI prepares GPT-5 for roll out​


OpenAI's ChatGPT-5 could drop in the coming days, and it could be one of the best models from the Microsoft-backed startup.

As The Verge's Tom Warren first reported, GPT-5 is being prepared for an August release.

GPT-5 is believed to be the "unified" model, which means it combines the breakthroughs from the reasoning and multi-modal models, such as o3 and 4o respectively.

ChatGPT currently has too many capable models for different tasks. While the models are powerful, it can be confusing because all models have identical names.

OpenAI maintains an "o" lineup for reasoning capabilities, while the 4o and other models have multi-modality.

With GPT-5, OpenAI plans to unify the breakthrough in its lineup and deliver the best of the two worlds.

"We're truly excited to not just make a net new great frontier model, we're also going to unify our two series," says Romain Huet, OpenAI's Head of Developer Experience.

"The breakthrough of reasoning in the O-series and the breakthroughs in multi-modality in the GPT-series will be unified, and that will be GPT-5. And I really hope I'll come back soon to tell you more about it."

OpenAI previously claimed that GPT-5 will also make the existing models significantly better at everything.

"GPT-5 is our next foundational model that is meant to just make everything our models can currently do better and with less model switching," Jerry Tworek, who is a VP at OpenAI, wrote in a Reddit post.

GPT-5 drops in the next few weeks​


OpenAI might use "routing" initially, which means GPT-5 might call a reasoning model in the background when it feels the query could be best handled with "deeper thinking."

Details of how exactly GPT-5 works are unclear, but we'll likely learn more about it soon.

My sources tell me that GPT-5 could drop in the coming days, likely in the first week of August, but since we're talking about OpenAI, remember that plans are always subject to change.

Microsoft is already testing internal builds of Copilot and Microsoft 365 Copilot with GPT-5.

Microsoft Azure is also preparing for GPT-5 integration.

Source: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/artificial-intelligence/openai-prepares-gpt-5-for-roll-out/.
 

OpenAI's CEO says he's scared of GPT-5​


  • OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said testing GPT-5 left him scared in a recent interview
  • He compared GPT-5 to the Manhattan Project
  • He warned that the rapid advancement of AI is happening without sufficient oversight

OpenAI chief Sam Altman has painted a portrait of GPT‑5 that reads more like a thriller than a product launch. In a recent episode of the This Past Weekend with Theo Von podcast, he described the experience of testing the model in breathless tones that evoke more skepticism than whatever alarm he seemed to want listeners to hear.


Altman said that GPT-5 “feels very fast,” while recounting moments when he felt very nervous. Despite being the driving force behind GPT-5's development, Altman claimed that during some sessions, he looked at GPT‑5 and compared it to the Manhattan Project.

Altman also issued a blistering indictment of current AI governance, suggesting “there are no adults in the room” and that oversight structures have lagged behind AI development. It's an odd way to sell a product promising serious leaps in artificial general intelligence. Raising the potential risks is one thing, but acting like he has no control over how GPT-5 performs feels somewhat disingenuous.

Analysis: Existential GPT-5 fears​

What spooked Altman isn’t entirely clear, either. Altman didn’t go into technical specifics. Invoking the Manhattan Project is another over-the-top sort of analogy. Signaling irreversible and potentially catastrophic change and global stakes seems odd as a comparison to a sophisticated auto-complete. Saying they built something they don’t fully understand makes OpenAI seem either reckless or incompetent.


GPT-5 is supposed to come out soon, and there are hints that it will expand far beyond GPT-4’s abilities. The "digital mind" described in Altman’s comments could indeed represent a shift in how the people building AI consider their work, but this kind of messianic or apocalyptic projection seems silly. Public discourse around AI has mostly toggled between breathless optimism and existential dread, but something in the middle seems more appropriate.

This isn't the first time Altman has publicly acknowledged his discomfort with the AI arms race. He’s been on record saying that AI could “go quite wrong,” and that OpenAI must act responsibly while still shipping useful products. But while GPT-5 will almost certainly arrive with better tools, friendlier interfaces, and a slightly snappier logo, the core question it raises is about power.

The next generation of AI, if it’s faster, smarter, and more intuitive, will be handed even more responsibility. And that would be a bad idea based on Altman's comments. And even if he's exaggerating, I don't know if that's the kind of company that should be deciding how that power is deployed.

Source: https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/chatgpt/openais-ceo-says-hes-scared-of-gpt-5.
 
In India working for TCS was always a safe harbor and they have laid off 12,000 people!


On Sunday, Moneycontrol reported that TCS would trim its workforce by 2 percent, affecting 12,000 jobs, over FY26. "This is not because of AI giving some 20 percent productivity gains. We are not doing that. This is driven by where there is a skill mismatch or where we think that we have not been able to deploy someone," CEO K Krithivasan told Moneycontrol.
 
In India working for TCS was always a safe harbor and they have laid off 12,000 people!


On Sunday, Moneycontrol reported that TCS would trim its workforce by 2 percent, affecting 12,000 jobs, over FY26. "This is not because of AI giving some 20 percent productivity gains. We are not doing that. This is driven by where there is a skill mismatch or where we think that we have not been able to deploy someone," CEO K Krithivasan told Moneycontrol.
it wasnt always safe - always, they have fired 1% before too, 10 years ago or something.

Automation does such things.
 
I bought one year membership at Data Camp (a platform where you can study data science, AI, machine learning etc.).

I am currently studying "AI Ethics" there. It is a pretty cool topic.
 
Yeah looks like average coders are finished.. seems really into coding this model.
Basic CS might not age well at all.
 
@JaDed

What do you think about Data Camp? Do you think it is good? I bought one year membership there.

I don't think I will renew as I also have LinkedIn Learning for free due to my library membership. Also, YouTube has free tutorials.
 
@JaDed

What do you think about Data Camp? Do you think it is good? I bought one year membership there.

I don't think I will renew as I also have LinkedIn Learning for free due to my library membership. Also, YouTube has free tutorials.
Its very good at least used to be, esp if you are into data.

you can now learn Data skills there and vibe code in Gpt5 launched today.. should be ideal (just my opinion).
 
Its very good at least used to be, esp if you are into data.

you can now learn Data skills there and vibe code in Gpt5 launched today.. should be ideal (just my opinion).

I see. Thanks.

I am liking it so far. However, I think it is way too pricy. I can probably learn all these from Udemy for much cheaper. :inti

Here are all the certifications Data Camp is offering currently:

dsdfsdsf.jpg

sfdsfdsf.jpg

sddfsdfs.jpg

sddfsdfssd.jpg
 
I see. Thanks.

I am liking it so far. However, I think it is way too pricy. I can probably learn all these from Udemy for much cheaper. :inti

Here are all the certifications Data Camp is offering currently:

View attachment 156701

View attachment 156702

View attachment 156703

View attachment 156704
I had udemy free from my previous employer , while udemy is amazing with videos and I learnt a lot there the practical exercises werent the best at least in my skill.

Here Data cert path will help with designing data models along with tasks.

It used to have good exercises, also since you are beginning your journey of learning without actual projects experience this is very good , as it will teach how to approach a new project.
 
I had udemy free from my previous employer , while udemy is amazing with videos and I learnt a lot there the practical exercises werent the best at least in my skill.

Here Data cert path will help with designing data models along with tasks.

It used to have good exercises, also since you are beginning your journey of learning without actual projects experience this is very good , as it will teach how to approach a new project.

I see. That's true. Udemy is good for video tutorials but not many exercises.

Data Camp has more exercises.
 
While its awesome I don’t see why its called GPT5.. it seems more along the lines of 4..
The only major use seems to be coding on this one.
 
Would any of you guys accept AI in the realm of fiction writing, movie scripts etc And direct use for creative material in the entertainment business 🤔 Especially if you were aware of it and what of it if you didn’t, would there be a boycott of such media & publishers / distributors ?
 
Would any of you guys accept AI in the realm of fiction writing, movie scripts etc And direct use for creative material in the entertainment business 🤔 Especially if you were aware of it and what of it if you didn’t, would there be a boycott of such media & publishers / distributors ?

I personally wouldn't boycott it. As long as it is good quality, I don't care who made it (ChatGPT or a human). LOL.
 
Would any of you guys accept AI in the realm of fiction writing, movie scripts etc And direct use for creative material in the entertainment business 🤔 Especially if you were aware of it and what of it if you didn’t, would there be a boycott of such media & publishers / distributors ?
I already watch AI videos on youtube.. esp the focus kind.
I do love the AI train reels as well, makes me calm my mind.

AI for graphics yes esp in shows and movies, it will definitely help the crapy Bollywood graphics.

I do understand it’s creating a lot of issues though, and people’s livelihood.
 
I already watch AI videos on youtube.. esp the focus kind.
I do love the AI train reels as well, makes me calm my mind.

AI for graphics yes esp in shows and movies, it will definitely help the crapy Bollywood graphics.

I do understand it’s creating a lot of issues though, and people’s livelihood.

For graphics and non-fiction content I think it’s fine as a consumer, but how can an AI write say a compelling novel like a Stephen King or write a script similar to a Nolan movie? I personally wouldn’t be able to buy into that remotely.
 
I personally wouldn't boycott it. As long as it is good quality, I don't care who made it (ChatGPT or a human). LOL.

I don’t think AI is capable to create something creatively invigorating in the entertainment business outside providing some templates and simple graphics type of content. I think AI tools can be effective in fine tuning your own creative strategy, but substituting the writers altogether for AI? That’s not something I could ever get behind. I am aware of Meta using the books of some of my favourite writers to train their AI fiction writing tools, however, one way to counter this would be to keep content fresh and develop more of an unconventional voice, but at the same time, I can’t see how even the best robot, could mimic the creative output of a human.
 
For graphics and non-fiction content I think it’s fine as a consumer, but how can an AI write say a compelling novel like a Stephen King or write a script similar to a Nolan movie? I personally wouldn’t be able to buy into that remotely.
It can’t but it can help you write.
Students here use it to write their papers already.

At the end of the day its generative you can generate and people with great ideas and imagination will generate..
 
@LordJames

AI is basically a clever program, it doesn’t invent ideas out of nowhere like a person might, or like some magical all-knowing figure. Instead, it relies on the information it’s been trained on or what it can find online, and uses that to generate its responses. So, what it produces is really just a reflection of what’s already been fed into it, rather than something entirely new or original.

I wouldn’t trust it for political debates.
 
It can’t but it can help you write.
Students here use it to write their papers already.

At the end of the day its generative you can generate and people with great ideas and imagination will generate..

Oh absolutely, I think as a tool for creative people, AI can be effective for generating ideas and providing some structure, but using it to write a whole novel or script without you really doing anything is not something which I’d buy into as a consumer.
 
Oh absolutely, I think as a tool for creative people, AI can be effective for generating ideas and providing some structure, but using it to write a whole novel or script without you really doing anything is not something which I’d buy into as a consumer.
I don't think it can do an entire novel, chapters at best, entire novel requires a higher rate which is not even available to us right now.
 
@LordJames

AI is basically a clever program, it doesn’t invent ideas out of nowhere like a person might, or like some magical all-knowing figure. Instead, it relies on the information it’s been trained on or what it can find online, and uses that to generate its responses. So, what it produces is really just a reflection of what’s already been fed into it, rather than something entirely new or original.

I wouldn’t trust it for political debates.
Extreme simplification calling it a “program”, it’s anything but a program, it’s ability to generate is unique, generation is just not reflection unless you think Google is a reflection of yahoo search.
 
Only Gemini is something references Internet overall to make a direct response.

Generative AI is along the lines of an budding artist being inspired from another, not the greatest artist but an average one and thats huge for people to have over their fingertips and their command.

For all its shortcoming generative AI is not a program, it’s something using which a capable coder can write a program.
 
@LordJames

AI is basically a clever program, it doesn’t invent ideas out of nowhere like a person might, or like some magical all-knowing figure. Instead, it relies on the information it’s been trained on or what it can find online, and uses that to generate its responses. So, what it produces is really just a reflection of what’s already been fed into it, rather than something entirely new or original.

I wouldn’t trust it for political debates.
James uses it too much and as a replacement for thought process. @Bewal Express do you believe us now brother?
 
@LordJames

AI is basically a clever program, it doesn’t invent ideas out of nowhere like a person might, or like some magical all-knowing figure. Instead, it relies on the information it’s been trained on or what it can find online, and uses that to generate its responses. So, what it produces is really just a reflection of what’s already been fed into it, rather than something entirely new or original.

I wouldn’t trust it for political debates.
Dear Brother,

Sure.

Please point out where I have said that it can be trusted?

Thanks
 
I don't think it can do an entire novel, chapters at best, entire novel requires a higher rate which is not even available to us right now.

Apparently Meta is using the novels of prominent authors to train their fiction writing AI, I don’t know how far they will get, but I found out about it through a familiar UK horror writer, I heard that legally the authors can’t do much about it either.
 
Apparently Meta is using the novels of prominent authors to train their fiction writing AI, I don’t know how far they will get, but I found out about it through a familiar UK horror writer, I heard that legally the authors can’t do much about it either.
Yup .. the worse part is they didn’t license all but pirated many of it , not only them even claude(anthropic) has a case going on, but no one ll take on big tech anymore esp after the big beautiful new bill which gives them power to get away with anything.
 
Yup .. the worse part is they didn’t license all but pirated many of it , not only them even claude(anthropic) has a case going on, but no one ll take on big tech anymore esp after the big beautiful new bill which gives them power to get away with anything.

If they were able to produce full novels I would be curious to see how good they are, but in this age, with marketing being done on social media etc It wouldn’t be long before you figure out it is written by AI, as a consumer, why would you buy a novel written by a robot, now that’s a good question to ask.
 
If they were able to produce full novels I would be curious to see how good they are, but in this age, with marketing being done on social media etc It wouldn’t be long before you figure out it is written by AI, as a consumer, why would you buy a novel written by a robot, now that’s a good question to ask.
People are having relationships with Chatbots, I think they will buy Novel and watch contents wholly generated by AI, this is from over a decade ago

Sick and depraved people dancing to a half naked AI generated image

 
People are having relationships with Chatbots, I think they will buy Novel and watch contents wholly generated by AI, this is from over a decade ago

Sick and depraved people dancing to a half naked AI generated image


I bet it will start in the east, that’s how the beast shall emerge :yk

Ok an image maybe I can somewhat see that, but a book or a movie or a TV show?……..
 

Very interesting, I am not sure something like that could replace a Netflix, but perhaps it could carve out a niche of its own, we are already seeing such content being posted on social media and YT
 

Chatgpt overtakes tiktok & gram in Pakistan, what is it a therapist or mentor, definitely has helped me in recent decision makings.
While it's helpful. One should be cautious with AI on matters dealing with one's mental health. The AI chatbots are biased and have an inclination to affirm the chatters beliefs.

This slowly overtime can prove dangerous or ineffective for the chatter (even though in short term it's helpful). As a real therapist or a psychologist understands when to break a certain belief. Where to interject and not reaffirm your own belief about something.

There have been recent studies on this too.
 
From what I gather, GPT-5 is a bit underwhelming. Then again OpenAI is saying that they are directing the traffic to inferior models instead of the new GPT-5 model. We will know the truth in a few days.

As of now, Grok-4 seems to be the leader. It can change very quickly. Musk claims that it is going to discover new science and it is PHD level in almost all subjects out there. Grok-5 is coming in December. We have to wait and see what it offers.

I feel XAI will achieve AGI before OpenAI. The rivalry between them is enough to spur them to get better than the other quickly. The race is on.
 
From what I gather, GPT-5 is a bit underwhelming. Then again OpenAI is saying that they are directing the traffic to inferior models instead of the new GPT-5 model. We will know the truth in a few days.

As of now, Grok-4 seems to be the leader. It can change very quickly. Musk claims that it is going to discover new science and it is PHD level in almost all subjects out there. Grok-5 is coming in December. We have to wait and see what it offers.

I feel XAI will achieve AGI before OpenAI. The rivalry between them is enough to spur them to get better than the other quickly. The race is on.
Not sure how grok4 is leader unless u have Elon Bias.

It consistently ignores instructions, it’s top 3 yes but don’t think there is a single leader.
 
Not sure how grok4 is leader unless u have Elon Bias.

It consistently ignores instructions, it’s top 3 yes but don’t think there is a single leader.

I don't like Grok.

ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Claude are better to me.
 
As per Microsoft, these jobs are at risk by being taken over by AIs (source: Facebook):

1754788016434.png
 

AI startup Perplexity makes $34.5 billion bid for Google’s Chrome browser​

AI startup Perplexity said it made a formal offer to acquire Google’s Chrome browser for $34.5 billion, in anticipation of requirements that may be imposed on the search giant in antitrust proceedings.

The unsolicited bid was sent to Alphabet Inc.’s Google on Tuesday morning, a Perplexity spokesperson said. It comes not long after rival artificial intelligence startup OpenAI also expressed interest in acquiring Chrome, which together with the open-source Chromium software is the main way people access the web on PCs.


:inti @sweep_shot @JaDed
 

AI startup Perplexity makes $34.5 billion bid for Google’s Chrome browser​

AI startup Perplexity said it made a formal offer to acquire Google’s Chrome browser for $34.5 billion, in anticipation of requirements that may be imposed on the search giant in antitrust proceedings.

The unsolicited bid was sent to Alphabet Inc.’s Google on Tuesday morning, a Perplexity spokesperson said. It comes not long after rival artificial intelligence startup OpenAI also expressed interest in acquiring Chrome, which together with the open-source Chromium software is the main way people access the web on PCs.


:inti @sweep_shot @JaDed
Lol just because Perplexity has PE money they are making this bid.

I hope Google top-shots dont take this personally and brush it off if not heavy consequences incoming for Perplexity.
 

AI startup Perplexity makes $34.5 billion bid for Google’s Chrome browser​

AI startup Perplexity said it made a formal offer to acquire Google’s Chrome browser for $34.5 billion, in anticipation of requirements that may be imposed on the search giant in antitrust proceedings.

The unsolicited bid was sent to Alphabet Inc.’s Google on Tuesday morning, a Perplexity spokesperson said. It comes not long after rival artificial intelligence startup OpenAI also expressed interest in acquiring Chrome, which together with the open-source Chromium software is the main way people access the web on PCs.


:inti @sweep_shot @JaDed

Nice.

I use Chrome regularly.
 
A nice introductory course on AI (around 5 hours long). :inti

It is from an organization called "Edureka".

 
A nice introductory course on AI (around 5 hours long). :inti

It is from an organization called "Edureka".

Some of the Indian colleges provided even AI certifications from Edureka, they do simplify the subject to convey the point.

They are better than other Indian counterparts but not the best also avoid spending money on them as in Western part coursera is more recognised esp once you know the basics Edureka doesn’t seem that worth it.

The one in the link is good but its a gateway to their advanced courses if I'm not wrong.
 
Some of the Indian colleges provided even AI certifications from Edureka, they do simplify the subject to convey the point.

They are better than other Indian counterparts but not the best also avoid spending money on them as in Western part coursera is more recognised esp once you know the basics Edureka doesn’t seem that worth it.

The one in the link is good but its a gateway to their advanced courses if I'm not wrong.

Yes. It is a nice free resource.

Anyway, I purchased Udemy courses and Data Camp subscription to learn AI, machine learning, data science etc.
 
Some of the Indian colleges provided even AI certifications from Edureka, they do simplify the subject to convey the point.

They are better than other Indian counterparts but not the best also avoid spending money on them as in Western part coursera is more recognised esp once you know the basics Edureka doesn’t seem that worth it.

The one in the link is good but its a gateway to their advanced courses if I'm not wrong.
Yes. It is a nice free resource.

Anyway, I purchased Udemy courses and Data Camp subscription to learn AI, machine learning, data science etc.

Bought this Udemy course. It is an AI, ML, and data science bootcamp.


They also have a nice Discord group where you can get career advice and study AI/ML together.
 
Someone was making a analogy online that when computers came they asked the typists to move to computers but they still lost jobs, while that’s true utilising the computer like a typewriter was probably the reason, computers created so many jobs and automated so many.
 
Someone was making a analogy online that when computers came they asked the typists to move to computers but they still lost jobs, while that’s true utilising the computer like a typewriter was probably the reason, computers created so many jobs and automated so many.

Everyone should embrace AI. It can take away many jobs but also should create new jobs.

We have entered a new era.
 
Back
Top