What's new

Chernobyl (HBO)

shah_1

Senior T20I Player
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Runs
20,811
So far it's been a masterpiece for me 10/10.

The only problem is the Russians/Ukrainians speaking posh english accent, should have been like Narcos otherwise it's a flawless story
 
So far it's been a masterpiece for me 10/10.

The only problem is the Russians/Ukrainians speaking posh english accent, should have been like Narcos otherwise it's a flawless story

Looking forward to this. Which channel/plaform in the UK?
 
One of the heartbreaking story was of Anatoly Andreyevich Sitnikov. They are many in that but this hit me the hardest. He knew that it was a death sentence

D57czgAV4AAF2UJ.jpg
 
I think Sky Atlantic


Terrifying and brilliant.

What did you all think of the series so far?

I found the first two episodes incredible 10/10. Chills you to the bone , the writing and acting is very good too.
[MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION] Nuclear power should be banned imo, just a matter of time before something serious happens to the planet.
 
What did you all think of the series so far?

I found the first two episodes incredible 10/10. Chills you to the bone , the writing and acting is very good too.
[MENTION=7774]Robert[/MENTION] Nuclear power should be banned imo, just a matter of time before something serious happens to the planet.

It’s a stern warning about what can happen if you unleash sun-level physics inside a planetary system.

Though what is remarkable is how fast nature recovered.

We have all become addicted to limitless cheap power. Wind, solar and tidal are not enough yet so we use nuclear to pick up the slack. Perhaps in future we will have to live more simply.
 
It’s a stern warning about what can happen if you unleash sun-level physics inside a planetary system.

Though what is remarkable is how fast nature recovered.

We have all become addicted to limitless cheap power. Wind, solar and tidal are not enough yet so we use nuclear to pick up the slack. Perhaps in future we will have to live more simply.

As with any depiction of the USSR of that era, the perceived rot of the communist system is a big feature of this story. I think they could have been a bit more subtle with it, otherwise it can make a largely credible show indulge in creating a caricature of communism.
 
As with any depiction of the USSR of that era, the perceived rot of the communist system is a big feature of this story. I think they could have been a bit more subtle with it, otherwise it can make a largely credible show indulge in creating a caricature of communism.

Perceived? What aspects were caricature?
 
Perceived? What aspects were caricature?

I think the notion that people were in delusion and being marched to their deaths through orders to go check on the roof of the core was truly busted and no one listened to reason seems a bit contrived. For sure the big story with Chernobyl was always that it took time for the government to get a grip on nothings, but watching that first episode left me with the feeling that the system of communism itself (unity of command and no questioning of orders) was as central to the story as the accident itself. Life is never so black and white, in my opinion
 
I think the notion that people were in delusion and being marched to their deaths through orders to go check on the roof of the core was truly busted and no one listened to reason seems a bit contrived. For sure the big story with Chernobyl was always that it took time for the government to get a grip on nothings, but watching that first episode left me with the feeling that the system of communism itself (unity of command and no questioning of orders) was as central to the story as the accident itself. Life is never so black and white, in my opinion

I found that credible. Bureaucrats promoted because of who they know not what they know, strict authoritarianism enforced by threat of detention without trial or disappearance - this is what I thought CCCP was like.
 
Absolutely superb so far, particularly the first episode.

I liked how the key events kicked off straight away and there was no pointless “see you tonight have a good day hun / I can’t wait to pick my boy up from school today” buildup. This is about the disaster and the victims, not the character’s personal lives.

Paul Ritter (normally a comedy actor!) was a standout as the loyal foreman in denial. The moment where his mask slipped and the vomit poured out of his mouth onto the conference table in front of shocked pen-pushers: in a word, great.

I would add that the “comradely” communist language and the use of human beings as sacrificial lemmings in the Soviet Union for the protection of the “perfect state image” was accurate.

Looking forward to the rest of the series.
 
Last edited:
great show. crazy how well they build the tension.

Nuclear power should be banned imo, just a matter of time before something serious happens to the planet.

for the benefits of nuclear power the price to pay, namely extreme vigilance with respect to maintenance and upkeep is well worth it.

eventually we will reach a point in time where our solar efficiency will be enough to fulfill power requirements, until then nuclear has many merits.
 
great show. crazy how well they build the tension.



for the benefits of nuclear power the price to pay, namely extreme vigilance with respect to maintenance and upkeep is well worth it.

eventually we will reach a point in time where our solar efficiency will be enough to fulfill power requirements, until then nuclear has many merits.

What I found disturbing was the lack of consideration for the danger and instead a fear of criticism agaisnt the state after the incident. This led me to think there are various nations which have nuclear energy esp 3rd world nations. The worlds safety is in the hands of people who may be incompetent or neglect the safety required.

Do you think nuclear power will always remain for weapon purposes? Because the IAEA cannot even inspect facilities of nations which are not signed up to it unless they agree and there are others such as Israel who even deny their nuclear weapons exist.

Human nature is such there will be more wars and no doubt nuclear weapons will be used in the future. Surely it's just a matter of time before the world is ruined due to this technology?
 
I think the notion that people were in delusion and being marched to their deaths through orders to go check on the roof of the core was truly busted and no one listened to reason seems a bit contrived. For sure the big story with Chernobyl was always that it took time for the government to get a grip on nothings, but watching that first episode left me with the feeling that the system of communism itself (unity of command and no questioning of orders) was as central to the story as the accident itself. Life is never so black and white, in my opinion

The person that went to roof happened for real. He died recieving 1500 roentgen to his head.
 
What I found disturbing was the lack of consideration for the danger and instead a fear of criticism agaisnt the state after the incident. This led me to think there are various nations which have nuclear energy esp 3rd world nations. The worlds safety is in the hands of people who may be incompetent or neglect the safety required.

i think that partly has to do with how wide spread ignorance about nuclear and radio active fall out was back then, the vast majority of nuclear power generation capacity is in the developed world, and with the processes in place now there are means and ways of greatly limiting nuclear fall out, for example fukushima.

Do you think nuclear power will always remain for weapon purposes? Because the IAEA cannot even inspect facilities of nations which are not signed up to it unless they agree and there are others such as Israel who even deny their nuclear weapons exist.

Human nature is such there will be more wars and no doubt nuclear weapons will be used in the future. Surely it's just a matter of time before the world is ruined due to this technology?

yep, the genie of nuclear weapons is never going back in the bottle.

obviously the future is a long long time to speculate about, but within our lives i dont think any country would use a nuclear weapon, for strategic warfare objectives they serve very little purpose, and the fallout of the world turning against you would cost too much.

as weapons nuclear war heads are extremely useless, as massive death spreading symbols of the anarchy humans can unleash on each other, which may encourage countries to avoid direct protracted conflict they arguably serve some benefit. just compare the wars between pak and india pre and post nuclearisation.

im not saying they are good, simply that they increase the motivation of non involved parties in any conflict between nuclear armed nations to ensure peace is maintained.
 
i think that partly has to do with how wide spread ignorance about nuclear and radio active fall out was back then, the vast majority of nuclear power generation capacity is in the developed world, and with the processes in place now there are means and ways of greatly limiting nuclear fall out, for example fukushima.



yep, the genie of nuclear weapons is never going back in the bottle.

obviously the future is a long long time to speculate about, but within our lives i dont think any country would use a nuclear weapon, for strategic warfare objectives they serve very little purpose, and the fallout of the world turning against you would cost too much.

as weapons nuclear war heads are extremely useless, as massive death spreading symbols of the anarchy humans can unleash on each other, which may encourage countries to avoid direct protracted conflict they arguably serve some benefit. just compare the wars between pak and india pre and post nuclearisation.

im not saying they are good, simply that they increase the motivation of non involved parties in any conflict between nuclear armed nations to ensure peace is maintained.

In our lifetime, do you mean approx in the next 70 years? I would put my house on it nukes would be used in the next 70 years. The powerful in charge will have safe bunkers or perhaps space stations to hide out safely until they can return. Ie. Iran attacks Israel in self defence when the US launches strikes and prepares for invasion. Iran launches thousands of missiles into small Israel, they will nuke Iran.... just a hypothetical cenario. I wouldn't like to be around if such an event happens but we both may well.
 
In our lifetime, do you mean approx in the next 70 years? I would put my house on it nukes would be used in the next 70 years. The powerful in charge will have safe bunkers or perhaps space stations to hide out safely until they can return. Ie. Iran attacks Israel in self defence when the US launches strikes and prepares for invasion. Iran launches thousands of missiles into small Israel, they will nuke Iran.... just a hypothetical cenario. I wouldn't like to be around if such an event happens but we both may well.

wars are fought on proxy fronts now. Iranians despite their rhetoric are pragmatic people, of all the middle eastern countries, they have had the least conventional confrontations with Israel.

the period of unsuitability of soil for agriculture, water to drink, etc of all out nuclear war would far extend the lifetimes of geriatric politicians.

there is far too much economic interest in avoiding nuclear wars, and all wars, as they say, are fundamentally bankers wars.

also bro i dont know about you, but desi diet and western lifestyle, 70 might be pushing it, fifty more would be a decent surprise lol.
 
wars are fought on proxy fronts now. Iranians despite their rhetoric are pragmatic people, of all the middle eastern countries, they have had the least conventional confrontations with Israel.

the period of unsuitability of soil for agriculture, water to drink, etc of all out nuclear war would far extend the lifetimes of geriatric politicians.

there is far too much economic interest in avoiding nuclear wars, and all wars, as they say, are fundamentally bankers wars.

also bro i dont know about you, but desi diet and western lifestyle, 70 might be pushing it, fifty more would be a decent surprise lol.

Haha yes you are right but I dont do desi diet, although getting old isnt appealing to me bro.

Yes proxy war is the the major tactic but the bigger powers lose regularly . I was just using the Iran scenario as an example not suggesting it will happen but it's a possibilty. As for economic interests this is assuming those in power care for the people they claim to represent. For them a nuclear war would give them more power and more control in the aftermath.

The US have dropped nukes when they weren't neccesary. Today those bombs are weak compared to what is around now. What will trigger such a war will be an economic collapse which is on its way. You cannot keep printing money in a debt ridden world and expect things to run smoothly.

Probably going a bit off topic here so lets hope youre right.
 
Human nature is such there will be more wars and no doubt nuclear weapons will be used in the future. Surely it's just a matter of time before the world is ruined due to this technology?

We could ruin the northern hemisphere easy as wink, though the south would survive. All that culture and learning would be erased.

Reagan and Gorbachev managed to take out a whole class of weapons and halve their arsenals. So it can be done. But more countries will acquire these weapons and none have ever given them up except Ukraine (and I bet they wish they had kept them to prevent annexation of their territory by Russia).
 
Wow episode 4 is even better

Clearly the best thing on tv right now.
 
Read a lot of good things about it, will try to check it out.

A tragic event that shows the importance of properly enforced regulations and avoiding corner cutting in industries where so many lives are at risk.
 
Do people really smoke that much in West? Inside conference halls, meetings, laboratories, etc.

Coming to the show, it's brilliant baring minor digs at communist USSR.
 
Read a lot of good things about it, will try to check it out.

A tragic event that shows the importance of properly enforced regulations and avoiding corner cutting in industries where so many lives are at risk.

Same here. Been giving it a miss but after hearing good things from other people and the reviews on here, seems like I should get watching.
 
Do people really smoke that much in West? Inside conference halls, meetings, laboratories, etc.

Coming to the show, it's brilliant baring minor digs at communist USSR.

Or course a lot of people smoked in the eighties, and why do you have a problem with criticism of a totalitarian regime which remained in place due to mass surveillance by secret police?
 
Do people really smoke that much in West? Inside conference halls, meetings, laboratories, etc.

Coming to the show, it's brilliant baring minor digs at communist USSR.

Growing up in uk a lot of people smoked - in bed, at work, in pubs everywhere day and night

Thanks god thats all changed here
 
Do people really smoke that much in West? Inside conference halls, meetings, laboratories, etc.

Coming to the show, it's brilliant baring minor digs at communist USSR.

There are smoking restrictions in force in some countries now (not all) but yes prior to the 2000s people smoked anywhere and everywhere.
 
Chernobyl: HBO mini series.

One of the best tv drama series I have seen recently,Highly recommend it - based on the true events of the infamous nuclear disaster in the Soviet Union during 1986. Very haunting and disturbing but highly gripping. Background music is great as well, especially in episode 3.
9.5/10.
 
jst saw the season finale, one of the best made shows ive seen in a long time. also enjoyed how they tried there best to explain what happened.
 
jst saw the season finale, one of the best made shows ive seen in a long time. also enjoyed how they tried there best to explain what happened.

Agree it was a very gripping yet harrowing series. Brings home to what nuclear disaster can do to the human race. Its still a no go area, maybe for hundreds of years.
 
Agree it was a very gripping yet harrowing series. Brings home to what nuclear disaster can do to the human race. Its still a no go area, maybe for hundreds of years.

also they did it in a very classy manner, they could have gone overboard with the drama of a nuclear explosion, but made a very measured, even intimate portrayal of such a large magnitude
 
Final episode was the best of the lot. Loved the wrap-up at the end as well - after being gripped for hours, I’d almost forgotten that this all actually really happened - so a closing tribute was a great way to bring the viewer back down to earth.
 
Last edited:
Final episode was the best of the lot. Loved the wrap-up at the end as well - after being gripped for hours, I’d almost forgotten that this all actually really happened - so a closing tribute was a great way to bring the viewer back down to earth.

the one bright spot that meant more to me was the fireman’s widow being able to conceive and rear another child and live till modern day
 
Jarred Harris has done superb roles. He was superb for me, in Terror, which was probably the best show in 2018 and then to follow up with this. Awesome actor
 
Wonderful performance from Jared Harris, so understated and dignified, and he made the explanation of the reactor failure so fascinating and easy to understand.
 
Jarred Harris has done superb roles. He was superb for me, in Terror, which was probably the best show in 2018 and then to follow up with this. Awesome actor

I've got a soft spot for him anyway from his role as the quintessential Englishman in Mad Men. Just love that guy's acting, mainly because he doesn't look like he's acting. I did find it weird to start with that everyone had an English accent rather than Russian, but overlooked it once I found out he was a major player.
 
Amazing show, episode 4 in particular was just beyond a masterpeice.

The show does well in showing how the failures of the USSR caused this problem, but also how the USSR was also probably the only nation at the time who could have "fixed" this.

Everyone should watch this series
 
Great show about a massive tragedy.

The Russians will make their own version which will apparently prove the truth & that the US were behind it all.
 
Love how it’s the US that Russia are getting back at for this - despite the small fact that “Chernobyl” was only part-produced by HBO, in conjunction with British Sky Broadcasting.
 
I didn't find this particularly enjoyable viewing, but it was compelling. The sheer scale of the disaster and the miscalculation involved was something else. It does make you take a step back and think about where we are these days, that a whole continent was affected to some extent, yet at govt level the important thing was not to lose face in front of their rivals, so propaganda was put before lives.
 
I finished watching this last night and it is truly one of the best shows in recent times, especially in terms of a miniseries. The gradual build up of the horror, the inner workings of the USSR (not so dissimilar to other nations if we are being honest) and the fine performances have made it so watchable, despite all the real world horror and almost humourless script.
 
“Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth. Sooner or later, the debt is paid.”
 
Finally sat down to watch this over the weekend...

Really powerful TV...the soundtrack was brilliant...and what was haunting about it was just how much of it was true...

The stuff about the divers...the guys on the roof...and the Ludmilla story and the guys liquidating the dogs came from survivors testimonies...

The stuff with the puppies was horrible...a lot of courageous people stepped up to prevent tragedy...

What's disturbing is how much bureaucracy tried to cover up...it's incredible that it took a man's suicide to finally admit that there was fault...

And lol at the Russian 'true' version coming out...
 
I think we should also have a show for the Bhopal Gas tragedy. As a chemical engineer I can say with surety that chemical plants can be immensely hard to handle.

While I was doing an Internship at Fauji Fertilizers, a small turbine malfunction happened and one could see how tense everybody including the managers were just by looking at their face. I think some time ago a small disk ruptured in FFC Mirpur Mathelo and it was heard in Sadiqabad. Just to make the whole point clear, distance between Mirpur Mathelo and Sadiqabad is around 70 kilometers.
 
All this hoo haa about nothing. Started of well but got really boring in the middle, dozed off a couple of time during the 3rd and 4th episodes plus the slow mo scenes, some ridiculous plot lines like the Russian miners bullying the Minister of Agriculture, creation of a fictional main character etc, really took away from the reality and made it quite unbearable in some circumstances.

Still cant comprehend how it is the best rated TV series of all time at 9.7 with a 150k plus votes. It's an 8.7 at best imo, probably tells more about IMDB voters rather than the series itself I suppose.
 
All this hoo haa about nothing. Started of well but got really boring in the middle, dozed off a couple of time during the 3rd and 4th episodes plus the slow mo scenes, some ridiculous plot lines like the Russian miners bullying the Minister of Agriculture, creation of a fictional main character etc, really took away from the reality and made it quite unbearable in some circumstances.

Still cant comprehend how it is the best rated TV series of all time at 9.7 with a 150k plus votes. It's an 8.7 at best imo, probably tells more about IMDB voters rather than the series itself I suppose.

watch the companion podcasts, they actually explain that miners were quite a powerful block in the soviet union as initially almost all the energy needs came from them. I did some further reading and there is a lot there to back this up. Part of the reason the USSR was rushing and building so many reactors was to counter the power that miners had.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.06952c7ca9d8
 
Last edited:
Finished it. I’d say it’s high tier 2. Obviously “highest rated show of all time” was just silly since there are shows that are better. Still a great show
 
9.7/10 is a bit much, but I'd give it a strong 8/10.

I thought Episode 4 was the pick of the bunch, most notably the rooftop scene where even I was nervously shuffling in my seat. These poor men have been sent to where the radiation was at its highest. That scene perfectly captured the panic and heartpounding dread. And yes if you time it, it was 90 seconds. It's a brilliant production.

It's a miracle some of the volunteers actually did survive.

The show also explains the nuclear science well for the layman. What I don't know is whether Dyatlov really is the comic villain he's painted as here ? It seemed he had a breathtaking disregard for safety and protocol.
 
I think we should also have a show for the Bhopal Gas tragedy. As a chemical engineer I can say with surety that chemical plants can be immensely hard to handle.

While I was doing an Internship at Fauji Fertilizers, a small turbine malfunction happened and one could see how tense everybody including the managers were just by looking at their face. I think some time ago a small disk ruptured in FFC Mirpur Mathelo and it was heard in Sadiqabad. Just to make the whole point clear, distance between Mirpur Mathelo and Sadiqabad is around 70 kilometers.

I agree but the Yanks will never put money up.
 
The ending was just great.

A very powerful statement given in the end.

Most people who dont like it is because the show concentrates on the dialogues more

I loved how he explained the whole series in a very simple to the court. THat was just remarkable
 
Most people who dont like it is because the show concentrates on the dialogues more

Thats quite the presumption. Almost all series by nature are dialogue based as TV is a writers medium.
 
All this hoo haa about nothing. Started of well but got really boring in the middle, dozed off a couple of time during the 3rd and 4th episodes plus the slow mo scenes, some ridiculous plot lines like the Russian miners bullying the Minister of Agriculture, creation of a fictional main character etc, really took away from the reality and made it quite unbearable in some circumstances.

Still cant comprehend how it is the best rated TV series of all time at 9.7 with a 150k plus votes. It's an 8.7 at best imo, probably tells more about IMDB voters rather than the series itself I suppose.

that was not ridiculous, it showed how under communism everyone was told what to do. THose miners were being ordered to risk their life someting that was fault of the state.

Plus,we are made to believe everyone is equal under communism but the minors outllook and the minister of coals was contrasting.

THose miners ended up saving hte whole world

read this
https://decider.com/2019/05/23/chernobyl-miners-epsiode-3/
 
Thats quite the presumption. Almost all series by nature are dialogue based as TV is a writers medium.

nope, most series, people rely on the action to understand what is happening.

Here you have to listen to each and everyword to understand what is going on, to what extent does the problem exists.

The reason why the show was great was the focus was on the dialogues. Most series would had recreated an imaginary simulation of hte chain of events, but this shows explained everything that happpened through dialogue.


An amazing ending. One of the best endings i have ever seen. The whole chain reaction and all was explained in a very simple way. And the way he shifted the blame from that one person towards the state was incredible.

The way they showed KGB, and then the KGB chief givingthreats to the main lead actor.

I read articles, and it was true. The guy who was leading hte iinvestigation, he was socially boycotted when he revealed all that. Thus, his suicide made everyone to take thsoe tapes seriously.

The guy ended his own life for the world so that the soviet took there problem of such meltdowns in future very serious
 
Breaking Bad, Band of Brothers and Game of Thrones are all rated below Chernobyl on IMDB but I think they’re all better than it IMO. Chernobyl is a Top 10 of all time perhaps but not a GOAT.
 
Just finished watching this series right now, and while it made for interesting viewing I won't be one of those who gives it a full 10/10.

8/10 is more like it, but I wonder how much of it is because I like Wiki-ing and YouTube-ing stuff and knew a lot of Chernobyl beforehand.
 
There's also an accompanying podcast series which I got around to listening to this week. There's some useful behind-the-scenes insights with the director Craig Mazin.

- The accident occurred on April 26th, days before International Workers Day. Officials in Belarus and Ukraine begged their superiors to cancel the parades due to the radiation risk.

Their response was the parades won't be cancelled and you're marching with them.

- Dyatlov was previous involved in an industrial accident where he was exposed to a near fatal dose of radiation. It partly explained why Dyatlov was so casual about the effects of radiation.

- After Pripyat, a city designed for the families of the workers at the power plant, was evacuated, the Soviets built an entirely new city called Slavutych. It has a population of 25,000.
 
In the 35 years since the nuclear disaster at Chernobyl, the nearby main thoroughfare in Pripyat, Ukraine, has been taken over by plants, trees and wildlife.

Abandoned hours after the meltdown of the Soviet nuclear reactor in 1986, the town that once housed workers of the nuclear plant and their families has existed ever since as an eerie ghost town.

But now its central boulevard has been cleared of trees and shrubs, and even reconnected to the electricity grid. In 2020, the former residents of this once-thriving town visited it for the first time to mark five decades since it was first established in the then-Soviet Union.

While only a trickle of hardy tourists have made their way to Chernobyl and its environs over the last decade, the Ukrainian authorities believe this could soon turn into a stream - if not a flood.

Public awareness of what happened at Chernobyl 35 years ago on April 26 has been heightened by a popular and critically-acclaimed HBO mini-series about the disaster and its aftermath.

Mass tourism would not only help to keep the events of Chernobyl alive, the Ukrainian authorities believe, but also bring in cash to help with further restoration work.

As well as the restoration in Pripyat, the government plans a new museum showcasing rescue equipment used during the clean-up more than three decades ago.

In the aftermath of the world’s worst ever nuclear disaster, some 350,000 people were relocated from the region surrounding Chernobyl. A new town, Slavutich, was established to house plant workers and scientists around 30km from the site of the explosion.

But the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone remains a vast, empty monument to the massive human errors committed by the Soviet authorities 35 years ago, which led to Reactor No. 4 exploding, catching fire and then spewing radioactive material into the atmosphere.

The Soviet authorities attempted to keep the disaster quiet. The wider world only learned something had happened at Chernobyl after radiation levels were detected as far north as Sweden. In Kyiv, residents were initially not told about the meltdown, which occurred just 65 kilometres to the south.

The reactor was initially housed inside a huge sarcophagus, which as recently as 2019 was still leaking radiation. That year, it was finally encased in an arch-shaped shelter. Inside, robots continued the painstaking process of dismantling what remained of the reactor.

Only now are officials Ukrainian officials comfortable in suggesting that, eventually, the exclusion zone, Prypat and even the entombed reactor could become a tourist destination: a monument not only to mankind's past mistakes, but to its ability to pick itself up and carry on.

“Our tourism is unique; it is not a classic concept of tourism,” said Bohdan Borukhovskyi, Ukraine's deputy environment minister.

"This is an area of ​​meditation and reflection, an area where you can see the impact of human error, but [where] you can also see the human heroism that corrects it.”

The airing of the HBO series saw tourist numbers double in 2019, authorities say, before the COVID-19 pandemic had brought it to a complete halt by the middle of 2020. When the pandemic recedes, officials hope that they can harness Chernobyl’s tourist potential.

Hence the work in Pripyat, where as well as vegetation-clearing and electrification, the authorities plan to construct set paths through the ruins so tourists can take in sights such as the city’s abandoned swimming pool and amusement park.

Thriving wildlife

All four of the plant's reactors are in the process of being dismantled, but this work in itself will not be completed until 2064 at the earliest. Parts of the site could be radioactive for centuries but levels are now low enough for tourists to safely visit and for scientists to carry out their work.

Ukraine still forbids long-term habitation inside the zone, although about 100 people - mainly elderly former residents - are thought to have defied the order and continue to live there.

The absence of humans has led to the flourishing of wildlife, with bears, bison, wolves, lynx, wild horses, and dozens of bird species living around the site. It has also attracted scientists, who welcome the opportunity to study how animals respond to the relative absence of human development.

“This is a gigantic territory... in which we keep a chronicle of nature,” said biologist Denis Vishnevskiy, 43, who has been observing nature in the reserve for the past 20 years. “The exclusion zone is not a curse, but our resource ”

Now Ukraine is looking to have the exclusion zone listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

“Chernobyl should not become a wild playground for adventure hunters,” Ukrainian Culture Minister Oleksandr Tkachenko told AP.

“People should leave the exclusion zone with the awareness of the historical memory of this place and its importance for all mankind.”
 
Back
Top