What's new

Colonialism not all bad, says equality campaigner Trevor Phillips

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
A leading race relations campaigner has defended the consequences of colonialism, saying that the empire made Britain a diverse and multiracial modern nation.

Trevor Phillips said he had no personal reason to make a case for colonialism, given that the first years of his life were spent in a brutal state of emergency in British Guiana, with friends and family locked up for sedition. He said, however, that its outcomes should be continually re-examined.

Mr Phillips was defending Nigel Biggar, the academic who has ignited controversy with an article in The Times entitled “Don’t feel guilty about our colonial history”, in which he called for a balanced reappraisal of the past.

Mr Biggar, a Regius professor of theology at Oxford, is leading a five-year project entitled Ethics and Empire to reappraise colonialism.

Dozens of Oxford academics have responded to his work in an open letter calling his views simple-minded. They said his approach, which said that any benefits of colonialism balanced out atrocities, was not serious history. They added that their criticism was not an attempt to silence the professor or curb free speech and said he had “every right to hold and to express whatever views he chooses or finds compelling, and to conduct whatever research he chooses in the way he feels appropriate”.

Mr Phillips has criticised their approach, saying that it was important to look at the full picture. “I have no reason to defend colonialism. But we should constantly reappraise its consequences, one of which is today’s multi-ethnic Britain,” he said in a letter to The Times. “It may be that the 58 Oxford academics would prefer to inhabit the largely mono-ethnic, pre-Windrush Britain (a population mix somewhat preserved in their own university) but it is a fact that we are only here because you were there.”

He also warned Professor Biggar’s opponents to beware of their language. “Students’ misreading of history is entirely understandable if they are instructed by the academics who criticise Nigel Biggar for asking ‘the wrong questions, using the wrong terms’, an attack line of which Joseph Stalin would have been proud.”

Professor Biggar has also been defended by the Irish author Mary Kenny, who said that colonialism often brought progressive measures for women. Irish missionaries, working under the aegis of the British Empire, campaigned against foot-binding in China in the 1900s, she said in a second letter. The Church of Scotland attempted to end female genital mutilation in Africa from the 1920s, which Jomo Kenyatta, Kenya’s first president, denounced as imperialist “meddling”.

Professor Biggar has also been attacked by Oxford students. Common Ground, a race rights group based in Oxford, called him an “inappropriate leader” for the project and accused him of “whitewashing” the British Empire.

Oxford University said it supported Professor Biggar’s right to consider the historical context of the British Empire. It said he was an internationally recognised authority on the ethics of empire and was entirely suitable to lead the Ethics and Empire project.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...equality-campaigner-trevor-phillips-zvmbzdcst
 
Colonialism, imperialism or the basic subjugation anyone is unconscionable.

Unfortunately, people are very selective with their outrage. They will rally against European colonialism but whitewash history and categorise the exploits of their "tribe" as a golden era.
 
This guy is a complete and quintissential Uncle Tom

When you want to make a point to defend your own point of view it is very effective method to use someone from the other side to give the impression of fairness. Trevor Phillips, Majid Nawaz, the Pakistani judge in the Rochdale trial, the list goes on. That is not to say they are incorrect either, just making the point in how it can have more impact: "See? It's not just us saying it, it's coming straight from the horse's mouth!"

The Times has been giving a lot of space to the defence of colonialism for a while now.
 
Yes Islamophobe Rupert Murdoch's Times which is employing and paying off plenty of traitors who are rightly/then ostracisized from their communities

Sarah Champion
Iram Ramzan
Amina Lone
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Colonialism, imperialism or the basic subjugation anyone is unconscionable.

Unfortunately, people are very selective with their outrage. They will rally against European colonialism but whitewash history and categorise the exploits of their "tribe" as a golden era.

Afghans and Sikhs come to mind.
 
No sure what could be disagreed with by a reasoning person.

I don’t feel guilty about colonialism, I wasn’t even born, and Philips is right, it gave rise to the multiculture we enjoy today.
 
I mean that Phillips has not defended colonialism, but merely pointed out that the good of multiculturalism has grown from that evil.
 
I mean that Phillips has not defended colonialism, but merely pointed out that the good of multiculturalism has grown from that evil.

Trevor Phillips thinks multiculturalism has failed though.

There are many fruits born of injustce.

Integrity and humanity should dictate that there are costs that are too high to try and acheive certain outcomes.

The benefits of colonialism as a principle were to benefit the nation back home, for example, railroads to boost UK's coffers.

I would say that any good that came out of it was down to the good heart's of individuals and not the colonial master as a collective.
 
Slavery made America and many other nations more diverse and multiracial so it couldn't have been all that bad eh?
 
You won't get this revisionism about Hitler or the Holocaust. It's a racist and fascist construct. The Overton Window is only open to certain White Supremacist cliques
 
I think this is the guy who, even after everything, is still a massive Tony Blair fan, and made a documentary about how racial stereotypes are often accurate. Certainly not a person to be taken seriously - and, if we are going to be really cynical about it, I would be interested as to who really pays him.
 
Its a universal fact that over time some good (based on one's perception) comes out of every single act that one performs, even if it is an evil act. It certainly doesn't make the act any less evil though.

The Holocaust is a big reason that jewish zionists have their own state today (good as per the Jewish perception) but does it mean Holocaust wasn't an act of pure evil? Certainly not.
 
I think there is an argument that could be made for colonialism if it actually benefited the colonised people. I don't know the ins and outs of how it worked when Hong Kong was a colony up until quite recently, but that seemed to be quite successful. Would a lot of the failed states ( I won't mention any in particular) be better off if they were run as a colony? That of course also begs the question: if they were, would that still be worthwhile for the colonial power and their own residents back home?
 
I think there is an argument that could be made for colonialism if it actually benefited the colonised people. I don't know the ins and outs of how it worked when Hong Kong was a colony up until quite recently, but that seemed to be quite successful. Would a lot of the failed states ( I won't mention any in particular) be better off if they were run as a colony? That of course also begs the question: if they were, would that still be worthwhile for the colonial power and their own residents back home?

The whole point of maintaining colonies was to benefit the mother nation. Any development or infrastructure building in the colonies was purely done to assist the colonisers in exploiting the colonies more efficiently. So i am not sure how the failed states would have been any better under colonial rulers unless the colonisers left them after developing them which again would make this whole conversation pointless and hollow.
 
Back
Top