What's new

"Covid-19, which apparently is not a pandemic in Pakistan, is swallowing huge money" : CJP Gulzar

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
"Covid-19, which apparently is not a pandemic in Pakistan, is swallowing huge money" : CJP Gulzar

Chief Justice of Pakistan Gulzar Ahmed on Monday issued directions to reopen shopping malls across the country.

During a hearing of a suo motu case regarding measures taken to deal with the coronavirus crisis — being heard by a five-member bench comprising the CJP, Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel, Justice Sajjad Ali Shah and Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed — Justice Ahmed questioned the "logic" behind keeping malls closed.

In its written order, issued hours after the hearing was adjourned, the court noted that the Punjab government and Islamabad administration had approached the National Health Services and Research Centre (NHSRC) for permission to reopen malls and will likely obtain one today.

"If such can be done by the biggest province of Pakistan, i.e. Punjab, why the similar cannot be done by Sindh and apparently, we find no valid reason or justification for the same," the order read, directing Sindh government to approach the NHSRC for permission today.

It also observed that markets and shops were also opened in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan and Gilgit-Balitistan, and the governments had agreed to ensure that standard operating procedures (SOPs) are followed.

"We expect that after such application is made, the NHSRC shall give their decision today and if their decision is that shopping malls are allowed to open, the respective provincial government shall allow the shopping malls to be open and shall not create any hindrance or obstruction in this regard but ensure that SOPs are followed," the court order said.

The order also addressed the opening of markets on Saturday and Sunday, saying that the move was a "violation of Articles 4, 18 and 25 of the Constitution" and was not "justifiable".

"We do not find any justifiable rational or reasonable classification on the basis of which these two days are excluded from doing business, for that, all days of the week are the same. It is for the convenience of the human beings that the days have been given names, otherwise, there is no distinction between other days of the week from Saturday and Sunday."

The order "declared [the decision] to be illegal and accordingly set aside".

Earlier, during the hearing today, the chief justice had remarked: "Coronavirus does not go anywhere on Saturday and Sunday.

"What is the reason behind keeping markets closed on Saturday and Sunday?"

While responding to the queries by the bench, Sindh Advocate General Salman Talibuddin said that the province was implementing all decisions made by the National Coordination Committee (NCC), which is headed by Prime Minister Imran Khan.

The bench said that it will be the governments' responsibility to ensure that SOPs are being followed.

The court also restricted Karachi Commissioner Iftikhar Shallwani, who had appeared before court today, from sealing shops and markets.

"Instead of sealing shops, make sure that SOPs are followed," the chief justice said and directed the commissioner to reopen the shops that had been sealed. He inquired which "small markets" had been opened in the metropolis. The Sindh advocate general said that all markets, except shopping malls, were open.

"Are Zainab Market and Raja Bazar small markets?" the chief justice asked.

"About 70 per cent people go to malls for fun," Shallwani said. Earlier this month, the government had decided to ease restrictions across the country and had allowed businesses to operate with SOPs in place. Markets — that had been closed as part of measures taken to curb the novel coronavirus — were also reopened.

The SOPs went out the window once the lockdown was eased as hordes of people headed out to markets without taking any precautionary measures.

The Karachi administration had sealed multiple stores, markets and salons for allowing large crowds to gather.

Hours after the SC's written order was issued, Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari — the chairperson of the ruling party in Sindh — expressed his views on the decision regarding reopening malls.

Taking to Twitter, he said: "Hoping sanity prevails in the highest court of our land. I don’t want to believe that the superior judiciary would pass any judgment endangering the health and lives of the people of Pakistan."

"I’m sure all honourable judges will give judgements based on facts & medical realities."

In another tweet, he asked whether we are "doing all we can to support our heroes?", referring to medics.

NDMA quizzed on expenses

The top court bench, in its written order, said that it was "not at all satisfied" by the report presented by the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), saying that it could "find no reason why so much money is being spent on this coronavirus".

"There are other serious ailments prevailing in the country, from which people are dying daily and those ailments are not being catered and the coronavirus (Covid-19), which apparently is not a pandemic in Pakistan, is swallowing huge money."

The order went on to say: "We are not suggesting by any means that the governments should not attend to coronavirus but we expect that the governments should not put all its resources for this one disease, nor the country should be made all together dysfunctional, because of this disease, for its consequences will be highly detrimental to the people of Pakistan, and the federal government and all provincial governments should address itself on this point."

During the hearing, the bench had grilled NDMA over the money being spent to deal with the coronavirus crisis. The NDMA had submitted a report over the amount spent on medical equipment and quarantine centres for suspected patients.

"What is the reason behind spending hundreds and thousands of rupees on one patient?" the chief justice had asked the NDMA representative.

"Money has been spent on medical equipment, testing kits and quarantine centres," the NDMA representative explained.

The chief justice expressed concerns over the money allocated to cope with the health crisis and said: "Corona did not come so that someone can take away Pakistan's money."

"Billions of rupees are being spent on tin charpoys," he added.

Justice Amin expressed similar reservations. "I don't think money is being spent on corona with due consideration," he said.

The NDMA representative said that Rs25 billion had been allocated to the body and all of it had not yet been spent. The chief justice said that apart from the amount allocated to NDMA, the government had also handed out money to provinces. Money had also been allocated for the Ehsaas Emergency Cash Programme.

Justice Ahmed inquired about the steps NDMA has taken to deal with the locust attack and said that crops planted for next year would not be able to grow.

"The agricultural sector will not remain as important if industries become operational," the chief justice said.

The hearing was adjourned until tomorrow.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1558005/s...alls-closed-orders-to-reopen-shopping-centres
 
He has taken a sensible decision to open the markets. Clueless Kaptaan has shown despite all good minds combined he still makes pathetic decisions. A 4 day lockdown with limited timings will get masses out since it gives them little time. A 7 day business without time restriction is more sensible than what Kaptaan had opted for.
 
He has taken a sensible decision to open the markets. Clueless Kaptaan has shown despite all good minds combined he still makes pathetic decisions. A 4 day lockdown with limited timings will get masses out since it gives them little time. A 7 day business without time restriction is more sensible than what Kaptaan had opted for.

Thank God Nawaz Sharif isn't at the helm during this pandemic.
 
He has taken a sensible decision to open the markets. Clueless Kaptaan has shown despite all good minds combined he still makes pathetic decisions. A 4 day lockdown with limited timings will get masses out since it gives them little time. A 7 day business without time restriction is more sensible than what Kaptaan had opted for.

But the Nooras and their supporters are calling for lockdowns! You seem very confused.
 
But the Nooras and their supporters are calling for lockdowns! You seem very confused.

They have zero opinion or originality. All they do is say the opposite of what PM IK says. That's the extent of the politics of PML-N/PPP and their supporters.Tomorrow if IK says lockdowns should be done, they will be like but what about the poor and hungry daily wagers.
 
He has taken a sensible decision to open the markets. Clueless Kaptaan has shown despite all good minds combined he still makes pathetic decisions. A 4 day lockdown with limited timings will get masses out since it gives them little time. A 7 day business without time restriction is more sensible than what Kaptaan had opted for.

Lmao when few weeks ago the discussion was to have markets opens Nooras were against it and said it should be gradual easing of the lockdown

Like pick a side for once.

Don’t just see what IK says and then do opposite of it
 
Lmao when few weeks ago the discussion was to have markets opens Nooras were against it and said it should be gradual easing of the lockdown

Like pick a side for once.

Don’t just see what IK says and then do opposite of it

The most striking about PK politics is the badniyaati of the Nooras and PPP. They are literally praying for deaths and everything seems to based around looking to overthrow IK. No doubt he makes mistakes and will do so, but compared to these losers, IK is a Saint.
 
The most striking about PK politics is the badniyaati of the Nooras and PPP. They are literally praying for deaths and everything seems to based around looking to overthrow IK. No doubt he makes mistakes and will do so, but compared to these losers, IK is a Saint.

Sure but if IK and PTI are rightly criticised you cannot jump at the Nooras, wasting your time.

Instead discuss the subject.

IK gave into international pressure. Its not easy not to but is waiting for others to tell him how to run his country, this is poor. Good decision by the judge.
 
We have another activist CJP on our hands, know whatever lil this government will achieve is also going to drain because of these Politicion type CJP
 
We have another activist CJP on our hands, know whatever lil this government will achieve is also going to drain because of these Politicion type CJP

He's made the right decision. A country with less than 1000 deaths out of a population of 200 million should not be closing markets, taking away their incomes and making their children go hungry. IK has been average dealing with this 'pandemic'. He needs to stop spending time talking on the phone to world leaders and actually save his people having no money to feed their kids.
 
He's made the right decision. A country with less than 1000 deaths out of a population of 200 million should not be closing markets, taking away their incomes and making their children go hungry. IK has been average dealing with this 'pandemic'. He needs to stop spending time talking on the phone to world leaders and actually save his people having no money to feed their kids.
But it's not the job CJP to take these decisions.its the job of our nut case PM
 
Sure but if IK and PTI are rightly criticised you cannot jump at the Nooras, wasting your time.

Instead discuss the subject.

IK gave into international pressure. Its not easy not to but is waiting for others to tell him how to run his country, this is poor. Good decision by the judge.

There is a balance. He hedged his bets, and its a gamble either way. I am not sure if you know, PK owes over $100bn, If you ignore the international opinion totally and it goes pear shaped, you look stupid and you don't get help with repayments.
 
We have another activist CJP on our hands, know whatever lil this government will achieve is also going to drain because of these Politicion type CJP

Our best recent CJP was Nisar and he was an activist. It depends on what they active on. Kana was also active but all his appointments were crooks.
 
Our best recent CJP was Nisar and he was an activist. It depends on what they active on. Kana was also active but all his appointments were crooks.
They are all bad in the long run even though they suit your agenda at one point but they bring political instability which destroys our economy
 
They are all bad in the long run even though they suit your agenda at one point but they bring political instability which destroys our economy

Not all are bad. CJP was excellent, and has left a great legacy. Not least fining MR 400bn, a guy that was hitherto, untouchable.
 
Yes he can. Its called contempt of court. Gilani says hi
That's called breaking the law and than getting the kick

Only parliment can Sack a sitting PM but for court PM has to break rules of the country he can't just sack whomever he wishes

No wonder army takes over GOP after a couple of years cause people don't even know basic civil knowledge about how the system operates
 
That's called breaking the law and than getting the kick

Only parliment can Sack a sitting PM but for court PM has to break rules of the country he can't just sack whomever he wishes

No wonder army takes over GOP after a couple of years cause people don't even know basic civil knowledge about how the system operates

I am not sure why I am debating with you because your understanding is on par with your average Noora but here goes. If the SC gives an order, the PM cannot ignore it, so if they say the Shopping Malls have to be opened, and the PM refuses, he is in contempt. If the PM is done for contempt he can be sent home. I hope its not too difficult for you to understand, or maybe it is.
 
I am not sure why I am debating with you because your understanding is on par with your average Noora but here goes. If the SC gives an order, the PM cannot ignore it, so if they say the Shopping Malls have to be opened, and the PM refuses, he is in contempt. If the PM is done for contempt he can be sent home. I hope its not too difficult for you to understand, or maybe it is.
You said he can SACK PM there's a huge difference between sacking and than removing someone due to contempt of court, only parliment can sack someone in that sense

That was the point all along and unfortunately you cant get can you?
 
You said he can SACK PM there's a huge difference between sacking and than removing someone due to contempt of court, only parliment can sack someone in that sense

That was the point all along and unfortunately you cant get can you?

This is getting silly. You didn't know that contempt of court existed, I had to explain it to and now you are hiding behind semantics. Would IK lose his job on the orders of the CJP if he didn't obey SC orders, yes. I wonder what other way can we describe that?
 
This is getting silly. You didn't know that contempt of court existed, I had to explain it to and now you are hiding behind semantics. Would IK lose his job on the orders of the CJP if he didn't obey SC orders, yes. I wonder what other way can we describe that?
Of course I knew wth 😂 I am just showing that you don't know that CJ can't sack a PM yes he can remove (due to not following the law not because he doesn't like the PM) but not sack, only superiors can sack PM and since in democracies judiciary, executive, parliment are balanced in power so no one is superior to each other So none of that sacking funny business and I did this to correct the terminology cause with the word sacking we show that one branch of government is higher than another which leads to abuse of power but if we use the correct terminology than we'll know who is abusing his power
 
Of course I knew wth �� I am just showing that you don't know that CJ can't sack a PM yes he can remove (due to not following the law not because he doesn't like the PM) but not sack, only superiors can sack PM and since in democracies judiciary, executive, parliment are balanced in power so no one is superior to each other So none of that sacking funny business and I did this to correct the terminology cause with the word sacking we show that one branch of government is higher than another which leads to abuse of power but if we use the correct terminology than we'll know who is abusing his power

No you didn't. You are hiding behind semantics. The CJP has the power to remove the PM, and where I come from that is called a sacking. You said he can't and now you say, you knew all along. You are a very confused.
 
No you didn't. You are hiding behind semantics. The CJP has the power to remove the PM, and where I come from that is called a sacking. You said he can't and now you say, you knew all along. You are a very confused.
Damn I can sense that you are emotionally hurt or something, Please don't get hurt that's not my intentions 😂
But the way you are saying
No you didn't, you don't know, you are this you are that, Noora, phatoora 😁- baby voice, sounding more like whiney express to me🤣🤣 it just sounds off

Never did I say CJP can't remove PM but it can only happen when PM is acting unlawfully but the term sacking is wrong cause it's usually associated with a supervisor not happy with someone's performance

Ok let's make it easy for you to comprehend where I am coming from, Can a judge fire someone for not doing his job, it's not his job only a supervisor can but a judge can carry out a PUNISHMENT for stealing money but he cannot SACK there's a huge difference between these terms and my only intention was that the terminology was off and if we think like that than the balance of power will shift which shouldn't happen but come to think of it Pak is a pseudo democracy right know and the reason is mostly people not understanding their civic laws

But I think let's stop know cause you are clearly not there right know and I don't wanna hurt your sentiments any further or you'll resort to name calling which will ruin the fun of this schooling of yours 😆

And honestly it's a waste of time but hopefully next time you use correct terminology
 
Last edited:
Damn I can sense that you are emotionally hurt or something, Please don't get hurt that's not my intentions ��
But the way you are saying
No you didn't, you don't know, you are this you are that, Noora, phatoora ��- baby voice, sounding more like whiney express to me���� it just sounds off

Never did I say CJP can't remove PM but it can only happen when PM is acting unlawfully but the term sacking is wrong cause it's usually associated with a supervisor not happy with someone's performance

Ok let's make it easy for you to comprehend where I am coming from, Can a judge fire someone for not doing his job, it's not his job only a supervisor can but a judge can carry out a PUNISHMENT for stealing money but he cannot SACK there's a huge difference between these terms and my only intention was that the terminology was off and if we think like that than the balance of power will shift which shouldn't happen but come to think of it Pak is a pseudo democracy right know and the reason is mostly people not understanding their civic laws

But I think let's stop know cause you are clearly not there right know and I don't wanna hurt your sentiments any further or you'll resort to name calling which will ruin the fun of this schooling of yours ��

And honestly it's a waste of time but hopefully next time you use correct terminology

So what you are saying is that contempt of court isnt acting illegally. You are are very confused. If contempt Court isn't illegal then people have been sent down for not breaking the law? Lol
 
So what you are saying is that contempt of court isnt acting illegally. You are are very confused. If contempt Court isn't illegal then people have been sent down for not breaking the law? Lol
That's not called a SACKING it's a PUNISHMENT I only had a problem with terminology my on the spectrum friend
 
'Supreme Court not concerned about money being spent on Covid-19 but the quality of services being provided'

Chief Justice of Pakistan Gulzar Ahmed on Tuesday said that the top court was not concerned with the money being spent to cope with the coronavirus pandemic but the "quality of services" being provided across the country.

The top judge was hearing a suo motu case regarding measures taken to deal with the coronavirus crisis — being heard by a five-member bench comprising the CJP, Justices Mushir Alam, Sardar Tariq Masood, Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel and Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed. Initially, the bench included Justices Umar Ata Bandial and Sajjad Ali Shah but they were later replaced by Justices Masood and Alam.

The remarks come a day after the bench, in a written order issued after Monday's hearing, had said that it was "not at all satisfied" by the report presented by the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), saying that it could "find no reason why so much money is being spent on this coronavirus".

"There are other serious ailments prevailing in the country, from which people are dying daily and those ailments are not being catered and the coronavirus (Covid-19), which apparently is not a pandemic in Pakistan, is swallowing huge money," the written order had said.

During today's hearing, the chairperson of the NDMA appeared before the court in order to give an explanation of the money being spent to deal with the pandemic. The bench summoned NDMA chief Lt Gen Muhammad Afzal on the rostrum and discussed the report submitted by the body. The chief justice noted that the report mentioned a company that manufactured personal protective equipment.

"What is Desto Pakistan Army? Is this a private company?" Justice Ahmed asked, adding: "The machinery for this company has been brought through a special plane."

The NDMA chief explained that Desto (Defence Science & Technology Organisation) was a subsidiary company of Strategic Plans Division Force (SPD).

The chief justice inquired if the machinery for Desto was being ordered from a single Chinese company and said that Pakistan only received "third class" material from China. The bench, after questioning NDMA chief, said termed yesterday's report as "very useful".

Justice Ahmed raised questions over the condition of quarantine centres saying that "10 people are sitting side by side".

"What kind of quarantining is this?" he inquired, saying that centres did not have clean bathrooms and there was also no water.

The chief justice said that "videos of quarantine centres' poor conditions are being circulated on social media" with residents telling expatriates who wished to return "to die abroad but don't come to Pakistan".

He noted that Pakistan was a poor country, saying "We are playing with money and don't care for the people."

"Graduates are not being utilised in our country," Justice Ahmed lamented. "Pakistan has a lot of talent, it should be used."

The attorney general of Pakistan told the court that Pakistan now had the capability to make ventilators. The chief justice said that the country should be self-sufficient in everything, warning that "there will be a time when nothing, including medicines, will be available from abroad". He further said that all surgical instruments could be made in Pakistan.

'Court didn't say anything to Sindh govt'

During the course of the hearing, Sindh Advocate General Salman Talibuddin told the court that the lockdown was no longer as effective as it was before.

"Beauty salons and barbershops are opening," he said. The Sindh government had earlier imposed a strict lockdown, that included the closure of all businesses and activities that might lead to gatherings of people.

"They are not opening because of us," the chief justice insisted in today's proceedings. "Your inspectors are giving permission after taking money."

The top judge went on to say that the "court had not said anything to Sindh government."

In its order yesterday, the court had directed the Sindh government to obtain permission from National Health Services and Research Centre to open shopping malls across the province. It had noted that Punjab and Islamabad had done the same.

"If such can be done by the biggest province of Pakistan, i.e. Punjab, why the similar cannot be done by Sindh and apparently, we find no valid reason or justification for the same," the order had read.

In today's hearing, Justice Masood said that administrations of Punjab and Islamabad had decided to open malls and the court's order was "limited to Sindh".

"Do not blame the court for the opening of malls," he said.

"Malls were being opened in the rest of the country so there should be no prejudice against Sindh [in this regard]," Justice Masood observed. He said that the court's order issued yesterday was "completely clear" and added: "Malls are situated in limited spaces where precautions can be taken. There is a lot of rush at Raja Bazar, Moti Bazar, Tariq Road."

The top judge noted: "Sindh government has opened all government offices. You have opened the sub-registrar's office." He added that the sub-registrar's office was a "corrupt institute".

"Government offices have been opened, not those of public service."

The chief justice further said that the order to keep markets open on Saturday and Sunday was only applicable until Eid. When asked to "clarify" that the restrictions had only been relaxed until Eid, the chief justice said that it will be done in the next hearing.

The court directed the federal and provincial governments to submit their reports on the progress made so far and adjourned the hearing until June 8.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1558254/s...19-but-the-quality-of-services-being-provided
 
That's not called a SACKING it's a PUNISHMENT I only had a problem with terminology my on the spectrum friend

"it can only happen when PM is acting unlawfully" and contempt of court is not illegal? I may be on spectrum but at least a basic understanding of law is not beyond my comprehension.
 
The only capable argument PTI fans have to label everyone with nooras and bhuttos when their decisions are questioned.
 
Also this lack of tolerance and name calling is not surprising. Since their leader has been doing this throughout his political tenure.
 
If PTI fans have so much problems with PPP then why do they appoint finance minister that served Zardari, appoint Fardos begham their information minister when she was key part of PPP govt. and Fawad Chaudhary, Chand shb. The list goes on and on.
 
The only capable argument PTI fans have to label everyone with nooras and bhuttos when their decisions are questioned.

Thats because you are. You corrupt politics is over, no one cares, your leaders have run away or a looking to run away. They are cowards for stealing from a poor country, and their followers are total losers.
 
Did they consult medical experts before reaching their judgement ?

Why is the Supreme Court ruling on public health policy decisions ?
 
"There are other serious ailments prevailing in the country, from which people are dying daily and those ailments are not being catered and the coronavirus (Covid-19), which apparently is not a pandemic in Pakistan, is swallowing huge money."
The collective IQ of these judges must not reach double figures.

Other ailments like diabetes and hypertension aren't contagious...
 
The most striking about PK politics is the badniyaati of the Nooras and PPP. They are literally praying for deaths and everything seems to based around looking to overthrow IK. No doubt he makes mistakes and will do so, but compared to these losers, IK is a Saint.

A lot of similarities with the US; where the virus reaction is based on politics. Anti Trump people are hoping the economy gets worse and more people die so he can be made to look bad
 
He's made the right decision. A country with less than 1000 deaths out of a population of 200 million should not be closing markets, taking away their incomes and making their children go hungry.

To put it in perspective,

In any given day, including today, as many people die in Pakistan of various ailments and natural causes in the few hours between Iftar and Suhoor, than have died due to the virus in the last 2 or 3 months
 
"it can only happen when PM is acting unlawfully" and contempt of court is not illegal? I may be on spectrum but at least a basic understanding of law is not beyond my comprehension.
You are clearly ignoring what I am trying to say purposely, peace brotha 👍
 
SC hit a new low with this judgement somebody to tightened up them
Pak people have this obsession for a guy with a danda that's why most people support army, judiciary while ignoring what they can can't do one can clearly see in this judgement CJP is abusing his power

Can US supreme court ask for "logic" behind closing or not closing malls that would have been a big controversy if they did that

But here people are defending this clear abuse of power
 
A lot of similarities with the US; where the virus reaction is based on politics. Anti Trump people are hoping the economy gets worse and more people die so he can be made to look bad

But Trumps own reaction was based on his politics. Trump is happy for millions to die, as long as he gets re-elected, IK knows that in PK if the lockdown is continued for much longer, people will die of hunger.
 
ISLAMABAD: Amid the rising number of coronavirus cases with the masses throwing caution to the wind, the Chief Justice of Pakistan on Monday expressed concern over the violation of social distancing in the Supreme Court.

Heading a five-judge SC bench, Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed asked at a hearing why the courtroom was jam-packed. “What happened to the formula of social distancing? Who are you and why are you sitting here,” he asked while pointing at the lawyers, media persons and litigants/public present in the courtroom.

“I don’t want something to happen in this court. You should care about the social distancing and take precautionary measures,” the CJP remarked.

All the judges were wearing masks as per the latest SOPs given by the government as part of the precautionary measures against the Covid-19 pandemic.

WHO asks govts to ensure that essential services for ailments other than coronavirus are not disrupted

The chief justice showed his concern over the violation of the social distancing on a day when the World Health Organisation (WHO) released its report, confirming that the impact of Covid-19 is global but low-income countries are the most affected.

According to the study, which was conducted in Pakistan as well as 154 other countries during a three-week period of May, since the initial days of Covid-19 pandemic, the prevention and treatment services for non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have been severely disrupted.

This situation is of significant concern because people living with NCDs are at a higher risk of severe coronavirus-related illness and death.

“The results of this survey confirm what we have been hearing from countries for a number of weeks now,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organisation. “Many people who need treatment for diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes have not been receiving the health services and medicines they need since the Covid-19 pandemic began. It’s vital that countries find innovative ways to ensure that essential services for NCDs continue, even as they fight Covid-19.”

Widespread service disruptions
The main finding of the study is that health services have been partially or completely disrupted in many countries.

More than half (53pc) of the 155 countries surveyed have partially or completely disrupted services for hypertension treatment; 49pc for treatment for diabetes and diabetes-related complications; 42pc for cancer treatment, and 31pc for cardiovascular emergencies.

Rehabilitation services have been disrupted in almost two-thirds (63pc) of the countries though rehabilitation is key to a healthy recovery following severe illness from Covid-19.

In most (94pc) of the countries responding, the ministry of health staff working in the area of NCDs were partially or fully reassigned to support Covid-19.

The postponement of public screening programmes (for example for breast and cervical cancer) was also widespread, reported by more than 50pc of countries. This was consistent with initial WHO recommendations to minimise non-urgent facility-based care whilst tackling the pandemic. But the most common reasons for discontinuing or reducing services were cancellations of planned treatments, a decrease in public transport available and a lack of staff as health workers had been reassigned to support Covid-19 services. In one of the five countries (20pc) reporting disruptions, one of the main reasons for discontinuing services was a shortage of medicines, diagnostics and other technologies.

The survey also shows that alternative strategies have been established in most countries to ensure that people at a highest risk keep receiving treatment for NCDs. Around 58pc of the countries that reported service disruptions are now using telemedicine (advice by telephone or online means) to replace in-person consultations; in low-income countries this figure is 42pc. Triaging to determine priorities has also been widely used, in two-thirds of the countries responding.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1560678/covidiots-in-courtroom-irk-chief-justice
 
The only capable argument PTI fans have to label everyone with nooras and bhuttos when their decisions are questioned.

Also this lack of tolerance and name calling is not surprising. Since their leader has been doing this throughout his political tenure.

If PTI fans have so much problems with PPP then why do they appoint finance minister that served Zardari, appoint Fardos begham their information minister when she was key part of PPP govt. and Fawad Chaudhary, Chand shb. The list goes on and on.

But Trumps own reaction was based on his politics. Trump is happy for millions to die, as long as he gets re-elected, IK knows that in PK if the lockdown is continued for much longer, people will die of hunger.

Supreme fools.

A simple question to our honorable CJP and Courts. If Covid-19 is not a pandemic in Pakistan, shopping malls e.t.c should be re-opened and should stay open, there shouldnt be any Friday saturday and sunday off. Then why they have shut down Hangu District Courts, when Corona cases appeared in some of the workers in there? Why Kohat District Courts today has been ordered to close, due to Covid cases? And also Local media has been strictly ordered not to share any news regarding this situation :))
 
Back
Top