What's new

CPEC could develop into Pakistan’s debt trap

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
The Pakistani economy is going through a ‘Creative Destruction’ of sorts. Firms without value addition, global market connectivity and innovation are dying a ‘peaceful death’ or re-locating. Unemployment level remains high. The official data are not credible. There is a lack of implementation machinery for facilitating Chinese private sector’s MoUs, deals, contracts and agreements.

Only big ticket projects by state-owned enterprises are being monitored by officials. The Board of Investment (BoI) mandarins lack corporate capacity, knowledge of global best practices, legal and marketing professionalism and have only English-speaking and may be some drafting skills.

The private sector has failed to move beyond ‘family businesses’, better known by the acronym ‘seth culture’. The private sector has entrenched domestic lobbies in the economy, while the public sector confronts institutional tussles and adopts a solo flight approach. The ruling political class lacks vision, integrity and leadership, with a culture of nepotism, favouritism, and cronyism in governance.
There is also a lack of collective leadership, consensus, compromise, co-existence and teamwork among the various state organs of power along with a lack of consistency in public policies. The small intellectual elite has been either sidelined or has chosen a ‘monastic life’ disgusted to see the affairs of the state, ever since the departure of the founding father Quaid-e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and the first Prime Minister Shaheed Liaquat Ali Khan.

Pakistan needs to attract Chinese private sector investors by offering additional incentives. Their investment in small and medium enterprises by way of joint ventures will bring in 90% of the investment envisaged under industrial zones or SEZs of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The existing policies are inadequate with Pakistan unfortunately becoming a captive market for existing monopoly investors, who blackmail the government, and an import mafia which remains keen to import anything or everything, in cohort with the concerned state institutions that destroys domestic economic activity.

An indication of this is visible as to how Pakistan’s ‘Oil Bonanza Surplus’ of $14 billion from 2013-2017 due to falling oil prices, was dissipated on increasing consumer goods imports which has sent the current account deficit to a historic high.

Pakistan’s human resources with nearly two-thirds of the population below the age of 30 years are its greatest asset. Its strategic geographical location is also a great advantage, but not the only one. Social capital is yet another with the most resilient, passionate and determined population. Natural resource endowments are another plus with eleven minerals included in top ten of the world’s reserves and an irrigation system which is the world’s second largest.

Pakistan boasts of eight climatic zones, 14 vegetation zones and four topographic zones. The country is blessed with a natural solar belt and a wind corridor. Almost half of the country sits on Shale gas reserves, which can be exploited with the availability of affordable technology. The Makran coastline is richly endowed with ‘Condensed Ice Gas hydrates’. Now the technology to harness it has become affordable and available, with the Chinese showing the way. The list can go on and on.

CPEC worth $62 billion is a flagship project of the Belt and Road Initiative. Besides energy, infrastructure, transport and Gwadar Port development, the most important component of CPEC is the development of the industrial zones, nine of which have been prioritised. These industrial zones also called special economic zones (SEZs) will house the thousands of Chinese industries and enterprises which are planning to relocate to Pakistan.

Since fiscal year 2013-2014, China’s direct investment in Pakistan has been at the top among all the foreign countries, for three consecutive years. Chinese total investment in Pakistan has reached more than $5.4 billion, making it the largest investment destination in South Asia. The hype on the CPEC is justified as long as the necessary spade work on the various details of operational, technical, administrative, fiscal, security and institutional coordination aspects are addressed.

There is a great possibility for a quantum leap in Chinese investment with the relocation of Chinese industrial enterprises to the proposed ‘Special Economic Zones’ all along the routes of CPEC. The success of CPEC investments along with reforms will transform Pakistan’s economy like never before.

Pakistanis are used to present others with surprises, whether on cricket grounds, battlefields or in geostrategic games, but the CPEC has surprised all Pakistanis. A lot of Pakistan’s intellectual elite do not know frankly as to how to react. It is obvious that for a country which has been in ‘Intensive Care Ward’ of the international financial institutions (IFIs), struggling with a billion or two of FDI, to be offered the prospects of inflow of $62 billion (still evolving), is beyond imagination. Even more difficult to comprehend, is the fact that $20 billion of Early Harvest Power Projects are already nearing completion. It is apparent that Pakistan is fast catching up with the ‘Chinese speed of growth’.

Not only China, but Russia, Central Asia, Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Europe and Africa are finding the CPEC as an ‘economic bonanza’ opening up ‘new growth points’ for wealth generation, in a recession-prone global economy. No wonder there is growing interest in CPEC.

However, for ensuring the full success of CPEC, there is need for adoption of an ‘Enabling Policy of Comprehensive Reforms’, in consultation with the private sector and ‘Overseas Pakistanis’ to ignite ‘Chain Reaction’ for Pakistan’s industrial potential. In this respect, Pakistan could emulate the success of China in mobilising the overseas Chinese.

The comprehensive reforms could cover good governance, agriculture, industry, energy, taxation, SEZs, SMEs, civil service, electoral, land, labour, administrative structure, higher education, foreign trade, maritime, higher education, health, environment, social sector and community development, rural industrialisation, rural credit market and banking coverage.

The resultant consequences of inaction and lethargy to enact policy reforms have been a low rate of domestic savings, tax collection, FDI and low fixed capital investment, low factor productivity, poor innovation, low level of exports, poor innovation, backward vocational and technical skills level, widespread destruction of the cottage industry and decimation of the SMEs etc. Similarly, there is an urgent need for micro-level research in universities and think tanks, on the sector wise impact of CPEC on local industry (terms of trade), environment and society.

Pakistan also needs to strengthen the professional and institutional capacities of its private and public sectors in order to fully harness the openness of the Chinese market by promoting its exports, provide a level playing field to Chinese investments, promote interoperability with China’s private sector, benefit from China’s outgoing tourism boom by mutual relaxation of visas and develop the full potential of the border land route.

Those capacities will need to be created, which the ‘Macaulay’s system of education’ has not allowed to be developed in the colonial slave societies. The most important of these is the capacity to think, research and innovate. There is also the need for revival of Pakistani social capital, our age old soft power values and work ethics to enhance the ‘Total Factor Productivity’, learning from Global Best Practices and success stories including China.

CPEC is a means to an end which ultimately is the economic take off of Pakistan. CPEC will become only ‘supply side economics’ without policy reforms, and will be unable to trigger the ‘economic take off’. There is an absence of ‘soft infrastructure’, which increases the cost of doing business. It is important that Pakistan’s think tanks, research bodies and policy-making institutions begin in earnest, identifying, conceptualising and drafting a series of ‘policy reform packages’ in every sector of society and economy, for submission to the parliament for priority enactment and executive agencies for speedy implementation.

If it does not, without timely wide-ranging comprehensive policy reforms, CPEC could develop into a debt trap. Time is of essence to avoid subsequent anarchy and chaos which can mutate into a ‘colour revolution’ of sorts. Precious time has been already lost. There exists now only a narrow time space between 2017-2020 to conceptualise, enact and implement the first phase of policy reforms, in order to realise the full potential of the economy. Those holding back reforms are in fact aiding Pakistan’s return to the IMF with unpredictable consequences.

Once, China’s Premier Zhou Enlai was asked about his views on the ‘French Revolution’. He responded by saying that it was ‘too early to comment’. Pakistan is among the best blessed and placed societies in the world. Pakistan only needs to develop a sound political system through wide-ranging electoral reforms, creating a filtering mechanism to ensure integrity, merit, rule of law and justice.

Pakistan has the potential to emulate China’s success in less than two decades, if it can adopt wide-ranging policies and reforms under a collective leadership. The CPEC puts Pakistan at the ‘epicentre’ of a historic global transformation. Pakistan, however, needs a reformer, statesman and visionary like Deng Xiaoping, Lee Kuan Yew or Mahatir Mohammad, to make it happen. The 200 million people of Pakistan must have them.

The writer was Pakistan’s Ambassador to Germany, Singapore and Mauritius. He spent a decade in China and is an author of several books. He is currently the Director of Chinese Studies Centre in National University of Science and Technology, Islamabad.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1580950/2-cpec-develop-pakistans-debt-trap/
 
Very quickly, debt only matters as long as you're not able to raise capital on the international capital markets - or your debt servicing capacity has deteriorated. Most capital markets look at a country's debt/GDP ratio (I know I'm oversimplifying). As long as, Pakistan increases the denominator at the same rate as the numerator, it should be okay.

Now, whether Pakistan can increase the GDP (at the same rate as debt accumulation) is a matter for another debate. But debt alone means nothing. It only becomes worrisome when the international capital markets turn sour.
 
Last edited:
Another point that the article misses is that most of the debt is USD-denominated. So when USD goes up, so does our debt burden.
 
Struggling to pay its debt to Chinese firms, Sri Lanka formally handed over the strategic port of Hambantota to China on a 99-year lease last week, in a deal that government critics have said threatens the country’s sovereignty.

Pakistan needs to be careful.
 
Struggling to pay its debt to Chinese firms, Sri Lanka formally handed over the strategic port of Hambantota to China on a 99-year lease last week, in a deal that government critics have said threatens the country’s sovereignty.

Pakistan needs to be careful.
This has been said a billion times already, probably more, but apparently iron biradar is more important that anything else including independence & sovereignty not to mention their own future.
 
Lots of hullabaloo on CPEC on TP by both Indians and Pakistanis. Personally I don't think it's too big a deal whichever way to Pakistan's economy.
 
You can thank the Nooras for state of economy , rising debt and now this cpec which most of it is nothing but a white elephant
 
In CPEC talks, Chinese drive a hard bargain with Pakistan

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan appea*red to have been pushed hard by the Chinese side to give in more than it secured in return during the recently held 7th joint cooperation committee (JCC) meeting of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

This is evident from the minutes of the 7th meeting on a series of issues including revision in the completion deadlines of the energy projects, the Main Line-1 project and early activation of revolving fund in 30 days for payments to Chinese sponsors.

The JCC agreed that Pakistan’s agencies in power sector and Chinese project sponsors should sign the supplemental agreements at the earliest and decided that “Pakistani side will address timely payment of electricity charge in power projects under CPEC as soon as possible”.

In accordance with the governmental agreement on energy cooperation between the two sides, a revolving bank account should be created within 30 days after commercial operation date of the CPEC energy projects.

The two sides noted that some energy projects under CPEC had very tight construction schedules and agreed to urge the financial close and construction of relevant projects as soon as possible. It was also agreed to “make reasonable arrangement of the extension in financial close and construction through friendly negotiations” within the Power Generation Policy 2015 framework.

The joint working group on energy was asked to carry out joint studies on the current power status, future load forecast as well as the potential power market in Pakistan.

The Pakistani side also recognized the importance for assurance of water supply for SSRL Thar Coal Block-I Mine Mouth Power Plant during its construction and operation period by Government of Sindh (GOS).

China also demanded Pakistan not to adopt differential electricity charge policies towards CPEC power projects designed and constructed to Chinese standards, technologies and equipment. Pakistan will respond later.

On the railway side, the speed on the ML-1 has now been reduced to 160 kilomtres per hours from originally conceived speed of 260km per hour. It was reported that both sides have reached agreements on making fast track arrangements for completing all related task for ML-I implementation in a timely manner. The Chinese side did not immediately accept Pakistan’s demand for easing financial terms for the ML-1 project.

Given the strategic importance of ML-I project, both sides jointly decided that financing arrangement would be made proactively and work on ground could be started early. “Pakistan side proposed that financing arrangement for the project may have favorable terms and condition which Chinese side agreed to consider in financial negotiations”. It was agreed that work on Phase-I of ML1 Project would be started early 2018, and all requisite arrangement including preliminary design review, signing commercial contract, etc. would be completed through proactive approach in a timely manner.

Pakistan also proposed extension of ML-1 to Torkhum and the Chinese agreed to discuss the extension to at technical level after completion of the feasibility study being carried out.

JCC expressed satisfaction with the progress of the “Two Big Projects” and Chinese appreciated efforts for making safety and security arrangement of Chinese working on these project. Pakistan assured that the issues relating to tax on machinery/equipment and construction material as per commercial contract will be resolved by the end of 2017.

The JCC agreed to accelerate the preparatory work including technical and commercial feasibility study of the projects like EastBay Expressway Phase-II; Gwadar Port Breakwater and Gwadar Port Dredging.

The 7th JCC approved Mirpur-Muzaffarabad-Mansehra (MMM of 200km) for implementation and deferred for next joint working group meeting the projects including Gilgit-Shandoor-Chitral (359km), Nokundi-Mashkel-Panj*gur Road (290km) and Keti Bandar Sea Port Development Project

On the Gwadar port side, China Overseas Ports Holding Company (COPHC) has submitted the Feasibility Report of Gwadar Port (Phase II) Expansion and the Feasibility Report of Gwadar Free Zone (Phase II) to Gwadar Port Authority (GPA), and both sides supported to carry out relevant construction work as soon as possible.

The JCC expressed satisfaction on the progress of 300mw coal fired project at Gwadar. The Chinese proposed to replace its company for the coal power project and Pakistan agreed to make amendments but demanded that Chinese should deposit funds for the land acquisition while promising to ensure seamless security arrangements.

Pakistan side proposed to build fruit and vegetable base at command area around Mirani Dam, to build Gwadar Fish harbor & fishermen boat making industry on Gwadar West Bay, to build Beltway Municipal roads, and Solid Waste Treatment Plant for the Gwadar city. Both sides agreed to have an overall study on three new projects according to the actual conditions in the future development of Gwadar.

The Chinese conveyed that Dhabeji Industrial park at Thatta, Hattar Industrial Estate II of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and M-3 Faislabad, Punjab currently have more advantages than other proposed sites for provincial SEZs. However, Pakistan side expressed that Rashakai SEZ was its preference in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and an additional SEZ (M-2 / Quaid-a-Azam Park-Sheikhupura) in Punjab. The Chinese Expert Group noted that Khyber Pakhtunkhwa paid high attention to the development of SEZs especially has done abundant work in Rashakai SEZ. Therefore, it “suggested to make full use of the positivity of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to promote the construction of Rashakai SEZ at the earliest”.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1376231/in-cpec-talks-chinese-drive-a-hard-bargain-with-pakistan
 
Back
Top