What's new

Cricket Australia and players reach agreement after month-long dispute [Post #245]

On behalf of the FICA Board, Tony Irish, FICA Executive Chairman said:

“We commend the ACA and Australia’s male and female players for the unity they showed during this difficult process. The ACA and the players they represent have come under enormous pressure in trying circumstances over the last year, and the outcome they have achieved is testament to that unity.”

“We particularly acknowledge the players who have stood up and spoken out, on behalf of their fellow professionals, and we applaud them for their leadership.”

“The majority of Australia’s professional cricketers were forced into unemployment and told they would not be back-paid. The ACA was deprived of vital information for much of the negotiating period. Repeated calls for the involvement of CA’s chief executive and proposals to mediate the issues (both of which would have led to a resolution of this dispute at an earlier date) were ignored. Yet despite all this the players and their players’ association showed tremendous resolve in ensuring that a fair revenue share model was retained, and that Australia’s female players were included in this arrangement”.

“This outcome is significant not only for the Australian players but also for players elsewhere around the globe. Revenue share is a key component in ensuring that players are genuine stakeholders in the game and we consider it to be international best practice in professional cricket around the world. The inclusion of women cricketers in this also leads the way in the women’s game which continues to grow and professionalise globally.”

FICA looks forward to continuing to assist and support other member players’ associations, and the newly formed Scottish Cricketers’ Association, being the first formally established players association in an ICC associate country. FICA will also continue to assist professional cricketers who wish to establish players’ associations in those countries where they currently don’t exist.
 
Cricket Australia concedes control of all domestic and international scheduling to a committee with equal representation from the players.

Your OP said "The weakening of the position of the BCCI continues apace".

You do understand that the main reason the Aussie players want control of scheduling is to make sure they are able to participate in IPL, the most lucrative league of them all.
 
Cricket Australia and players reach agreement after month-long dispute

Cricket Australia and its players have reached a peace agreement, resetting and postponing last month’s financial revenue forecast.

They have been in dispute since last month when CA predicted a near 50% drop in revenue for the 2020-21 financial year.

On Saturday the Australian Cricketers’ Association withdrew its notice of dispute.

CA will retain the right to provide a new projection later in the financial year, given it was working off several models for the initial forecasting.

The move is seen as a win and a commonsense approach from both parties as the picture for the summer ahead remains so unclear.

It also signals the first real progression between the two in months, and comes just weeks after Nick Hockley replaced Kevin Roberts as interim chief executive.

Previously locked into providing the forecasting by the end of April in the MOU before a month-long extension was granted, officials will now be able to have a better idea of how the summer will progress.

Officials still hope for uncapped crowds for both the international summer – including four Tests against India – and the Big Bash League.

However, the recent coronavirus spike in Victoria has shown how unpredictable it is and what effect it could have on the summer.

The Twenty20 World Cup – scheduled for Australia in October and November – is also still to be cancelled in what is expected to be a $20m blow.

“Calculating revenue projections 12 months ahead during a once-in-a-century pandemic has not been without its challenges,” CA said.

“But we believe we have arrived at a position that provides all parties with greater certainty about how to navigate the next year ...

“Today’s agreement is a significant step forward in cricket’s response to the challenges presented by the Covid-19 pandemic.”

The ACR projections do not immediately affect player pay but rather the adjustment ledger at the end of the MOU. Changes in the forecasting happen every year but none have been as significant as during the coronavirus.

“This ‘reset’ is both welcome and sensible,” ACA’s chief executive, Alistair Nicholson, said.

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2...yers-reach-agreement-after-month-long-dispute
 
Cricket Australia (CA) has withdrawn a gloomy revenue forecast which led to the departure of chief executive Kevin Roberts last month and threatened an ugly standoff with the players' union.

The Australian Cricketers Association (ACA), which negotiated a revenue-share pay deal for the players in 2017, said the “reset” was “welcome and sensible” and agreed to drop its formal dispute of the projections.

“Under this reset, CA has agreed to withdraw its June 2020 notices containing its revised revenue forecast, and in its place, roll over its 'pre-coronavirus' April 2019 forecast,” the union said it a statement on Monday.

Despite the shutdown of sport having occurred at the end of the cricket season and Australia having been relatively successful in containing the pandemic, CA in early June forecast a drop in revenue of nearly 50% for the 2020-21 season.

The knock-on effect of this drop on grants to the powerful state bodies and player salaries triggered major discontent in the game and resulted in the ousting of Roberts last month.

Cricket Australia said in a statement on Monday that it had “agreed a way forward on Australian cricket's response to COVID-19” with the union.

“The parties have agreed to postpone the Australian Cricket Revenue projection until such time they are better able to assess the financial impact of the pandemic and calculate a clear projection for the year ahead,” the governing body said.

“Calculating revenue projections 12 months ahead during a once-in-a-century pandemic has not been without its challenges, but we believe we have arrived at a position that provides all parties with greater certainty ...”

CA said when the financial impact of the pandemic was clearer it would reassess the revenue forecast. The ACA said they were “free” to do so “should there be a material revenue event affecting cricket”.

https://sportstar.thehindu.com/cric...australia-financial-reset/article31999064.ece
 
Back
Top