Rana
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Runs
- 85,915
The Wasted Talents/ Under Achievers thread
Which players do you think had the talent to run riot in cricket, but either wasted their own talent or their boards wasted? Who could have been a legend but instead is a nobody, who is big but should have been bigger? my take....
Andrew Flintoff
Will be remebered as one of England's best players, best all-rounder and a fine talent. But retiring at 31, certainly does not do justice to the gift God had given him. Plagued with injury, Andrew Flintoff should have done better than just 2 Ashes home wins in his career. He was very much capable of being a key member for England to propel in One Day cricket. Such a fine fast bowler, brilliant hitter and bucket hand fielder. Certainly retired too early.
Azhar Mahmood
A very good all-rounder. Very handy with the bat and a decent bowler. He certainly could have achieved what Afridi and Razzaq did, if not more. Looks the better batsmen out of the three and at times a better bowler than Razzaq, but for what reason god knows only he did not serve his country the way he could have.
Shane Bond
Such a beautiful fast bowler, was a delight to watch. Had he been fit throughout his career, was certainly a 400-500 Test wicket taker. One of the saddest career's IMO.
Irfan Pathan
The reason for his downfall is still a mystery. Either Ian Chappel made him believe he was something that he didnt need to be or Stardom was too much for him to handle and he made the wrong decision. Had he stuck to his bowling only and opted to be a minor late innings hitter, he was well on course to be India's best fast bowler. Such an amazing out-swinger to the left hander and In-swing to the right, was a delight to watch on song! India didnt need him as a real genuine all-rounder, they had plenty to cover with the Bat, but for some reason, they wanted more.
please post more names
Which players do you think had the talent to run riot in cricket, but either wasted their own talent or their boards wasted? Who could have been a legend but instead is a nobody, who is big but should have been bigger? my take....
Andrew Flintoff
Will be remebered as one of England's best players, best all-rounder and a fine talent. But retiring at 31, certainly does not do justice to the gift God had given him. Plagued with injury, Andrew Flintoff should have done better than just 2 Ashes home wins in his career. He was very much capable of being a key member for England to propel in One Day cricket. Such a fine fast bowler, brilliant hitter and bucket hand fielder. Certainly retired too early.
Azhar Mahmood
A very good all-rounder. Very handy with the bat and a decent bowler. He certainly could have achieved what Afridi and Razzaq did, if not more. Looks the better batsmen out of the three and at times a better bowler than Razzaq, but for what reason god knows only he did not serve his country the way he could have.
Shane Bond
Such a beautiful fast bowler, was a delight to watch. Had he been fit throughout his career, was certainly a 400-500 Test wicket taker. One of the saddest career's IMO.
Irfan Pathan
The reason for his downfall is still a mystery. Either Ian Chappel made him believe he was something that he didnt need to be or Stardom was too much for him to handle and he made the wrong decision. Had he stuck to his bowling only and opted to be a minor late innings hitter, he was well on course to be India's best fast bowler. Such an amazing out-swinger to the left hander and In-swing to the right, was a delight to watch on song! India didnt need him as a real genuine all-rounder, they had plenty to cover with the Bat, but for some reason, they wanted more.
please post more names