What's new

Do Pakistanis and Indians have an unhealthy obsession with skin colour?

At least in the Humsaaya Mulk, they’ve probably just thrown in the towel, but instead of acknowledging that their product doesn’t work, will declare it proof that they’re in step with the zeitgeist.
 
NEW DELHI: Unilever is facing calls to scrap a range of skin lightening products in South Asia, where critics said a rebranding announced on Thursday was a “gimmick” that did not fully resolve the problem.

“Fair & Lovely” products are sold across Asia, but the brand has long been criticised as perpetuating negative racial stereotypes and the company has faced intensified pressure in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement.

On Thursday, Unilever announced it was dropping the word “fair” from the name, a move applauded by some but criticised by others, with many people on social media in India saying it did not go far enough.

One Twitter user urged the company to “pull the plug on the product”, while another said if the brand was “targeting the same set of people even with a different name, it doesn’t become any less problematic”, calling the change “a gimmick”.

A spokeswoman for the company said it was removing all references to whitening and lightening from its branding and that the name change was “not the end destination”.

“We will also continue to evolve our advertising, to feature women of different skin tones, representative of the variety of beauty across India and other countries. We are fully committed to caring for and celebrating all skin tones,” she said.

After years of criticism and campaigns against such products, many brands moved to calling them “skin brightening”, “whitening” or “lightening” creams and face washes. Unilever said it would remove the words “fair/fairness”, “white/whitening”, and “light/lightening” from all its products and rename “Fair & Lovely” in the next few months.

Source Dawn
 
New Delhi: Actress Richa Chadha on Friday welcomed Hindustan Unilever's decision to rename their product and drop "Fair" from "Fair & Lovely" and added that it will hopefully change mindsets too. "I welcome this decision by the brand... and it's not easy... I hope slowly and steadily mindsets change," she wrote on Instagram. Richa Chadha accompanied the post with a picture of herself wearing a t-shirt which read "Not Fair But Lovely," which she got printed in 2015. She said, "We have been told since we were children, that fairness is the only definition of beauty. It is also another unfortunate by-product of colonialism and casteism! But it is 2020 and a lot of ** is getting dismantled! It took me many years of unlearning to gain confidence and start loving my complexion."

Supporting the brand for renaming their product, Richa also said, "Yesterday, the brand and I were finally in agreement! Yesterday, they dropped the word "Fair" from their product name... Before you attack the brand for only paying 'lip service', please remember, it takes many generations for ideas to change. There is demand and hence there is supply... We must continuously and without any influence of the West, define our own idea of beauty. Beauty must be inclusive! Bravo."

Actors Nandita Das and Abhay Deol, who have long criticised celeb endorsements of fairness creams, also welcomed the brand's decision to rename the product. Actress Bipasha Basu talked about her personal experience of skin colour bias over the years, in the wake of Hindustan Unilever renaming of "Fair & Lovely" products.

https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/...-lovely-post-2252668?pfrom=home-lateststories
 
The Bollywood film industry is a global phenomenon built on glitz and glamour. But it has also faced accusations of being among the biggest purveyors of racism for glorifying fair complexions in its hyperbolic love stories and catchy songs. Now, amid anger over what some consider Bollywood’s hypocritical stance on Black Lives Matter, the industry has finally been forced to confront one of its most enduring taboos.

Bollywood has witnessed considerable liberalisation in recent years. But while taboos such as same-sex relationships have been relegated to a past in which stars hid behind a rose bush to steal a kiss, the industry’s determination to cling to colourism – prejudice against people of your own race on the basis of skin colour – has become a cause of anger and dismay.

The issue erupted earlier this month when a number of stars, including the industry’s biggest export, Priyanka Chopra Jonas, posted their support of BLM on social media. While Chopra’s message was perhaps aimed at her western fan base, Bollywood enthusiasts swiftly seized on her post to highlight her appearance in an advertising campaign for skin-lightening products and for perpetuating what many consider racial stereotypes in films such as Fashion.

Chopra and other stars were also criticised for protesting against racism in the west while allegedly remaining silent on issues in India such as attacks on Muslims and other communities, and the abuse of migrant workers, particularly from Africa.

While the country’s obsession with skin colour has its roots in the caste system and its history of colonial subjugation, a new kind of caste system is emerging now, defined by symbols of success. The film industry is built on marketing an aspiration in which fair skin is seen as much a status symbol as designer handbags and sports cars.

Pallavi Sharda is bridging the gap between Bollywood and the west.

“The Indian Hindu caste system is part of the problem of colourism in India and was exploited under colonialism. These power relations are still seen in Bollywood today,” said Dr Rajinder Dudrah, author of The Bollywood Reader.

“Bollywood is associated with glamour and promotes aspirational Indian values of wealth and success. It sells that aspiration via its stars, who promote skin-lightening creams as part of their star personas. This has highlighted the ways in which Bollywood mirrors attitudes to skin colour and social hierarchies prevalent in Indian society.”

Million-dollar skin lightening contracts were once considered as much a part and parcel of Bollywood stardom as red carpet premieres, but a new generation of young actresses has been vocal about the industry’s obsession with fair skin.

Among those is Pallavi Charda, star of the ITV drama Beecham Place, who is one of a growing number of actresses bridging the gap between Bollywood and the west. “There’s no doubt there is bias against darker- skinned actors in Bollywood. I was often called ‘dusky’ for my tanned skin. I’ve been offered advertising contracts for skin-lightening products, but declined them.

“India has a fair-skin complex. It’s sad how this has been perpetuated through popular culture, with fair as good and dark as bad.”

According to a World Health Organization study, an estimated 61% of women in India use skin-lightening creams, and the industry is forecast to be worth $31.2bn globally by 2024.

While headlines have focused on British-Dutch company Unilever’s decision last week to change the name of its infamous ‘Fair and Lovely’ range (though it didn’t withdraw the product from sale), many skin-lightening products in India are manufactured by brands which are household names in the UK, including Garnier and L’Oreal. Women on low incomes are often forced to resort to cheap, domestically manufactured alternatives which can contain harmful ingredients such as mercury.

Despite being one of India’s most celebrated actresses for her performances in films such as Deepa Mehta’s Fire, Nandita Das said she has faced discrimination in the industry. Her experience inspired her to get involved in the “India’s Got Colour” campaign, which encourages young women to embrace their natural skin tones. “The glorification of fair skin has been present in our films for a very long time and reflects the bias of our society,” said Das. “When I play a slum dweller or a Dalit (untouchable caste) woman, my skin is perfect, but directors tell me to make my skin lighter to play affluent upper-class roles.

“Films associate fairness with beauty, success and love and acceptability. It becomes about making women feel inadequate.

“It’s hypocritical to protest and say #blacklivesmatter, yet discriminate against people with dark skins and endorse fairness products in our own country,

“Now society is more vocal about these hypocrisies and many actors have been called out for it. The more we call out discrimination, the more we address the issue,” she said.

https://www.theguardian.com/film/20...-skin-bollywood-stars-in-their-own-racism-row
 
A new Netflix show about an Indian matchmaker catering to the high demands of potential brides and grooms, and their parents, has stoked an online debate about arranged marriages in the country.

The eight-part series, Indian Matchmaking, premiered on Netflix last week and is currently among its top-ranked India shows. It features Sima Taparia, a real-life matchmaker from Mumbai, who offers her services to families in India and abroad.

Arranged marriages in India are mostly guided by parents who want to find a "suitable match" for their children.

The show has become the subject of memes, jokes, and criticism, about the pickiness of the potential spouses and their parents, with long lists of demands centring around factors like caste, height or skin colour.

Indian Matchmaking isn't just about the liberal colorist and sexist fabric South Asian cultures are steeped in. It's about Brahmanical patriarchy. It's shaped by gender, caste, and economic relationships, and Indian Matchmaking depicts exactly that.

— Sharmin Hossain (@sharminultra) July 19, 2020
The show "makes very clear how regressive Indian communities can be. Where sexism, casteism, and classism are a prevalent part of the process of finding a life partner," wrote Twitter user Maunika Gowardhan.

Thousands of Twitter and Instagram posts echo that view. "The show is simply holding a mirror to the ugly society we are a part of," Vishaka George, another Twitter user, wrote.


Created by Oscar-nominated director Smriti Mundhra, the show focuses on matchmaker Taparia's visits to the homes of families who want her to help find an ideal spouse.

After listening to their wishlists, she presents the resumes of prospective matches and then arranges for meetings.

"The two families have their reputation and many millions of dollars at stake. So the parents guide their children," Taparia says at one point in the show, referring to some of her wealthier clients.


In the first episode titled Slim, Trim and Educated, we see Taparia sitting with an Indian mother. Just as she says: "So you want a smart, outgoing, height ..." the mother interjects, "I won't even consider [a girl] below 5 feet 3 inches."

The mother tells Taparia her son had received a lot of marriage proposals, but none have panned out because, in most cases, the prospective bride's education or height were not ideal.

In India, an arranged marriage proposal can involve the parents of either bride or groom reaching out to the families of prospective matches.

Some have praised the show for its honesty and treating its subjects respectfully.

"The hate against it is, frankly, baffling ... Indian Matchmaking is well on its way to becoming a cultural phenomenon," a column in Mint newspaper said.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020...s-triggers-online-debate-200721054100651.html
 
Indian TV star Chethana Raj has died at the age of 21 after having fat removal surgery.

The actress was reportedly admitted into a private plastic surgery hospital in Bengaluru, Karnataka, on Monday, but is said to have developed complications as fluid began to accumulated in her lungs.

She later died of a cardiac arrest, after being rushed to another hospital where doctors were unsuccessful in reviving her through CPR.

Chethana had starred in popular Indian TV series Geetha, Doresaani and Olavina Nildana, as well as in Kannada film Havayaami.

According to reports, she had not informed her parents about the surgery and went to Shetty’s Cosmetic Centre with her friends, where unfortunately the surgery did not go to plan.

She was then rushed to Kaade Hospital but died at 6.45pm after suffering a cardiac arrest, despite emergency doctors trying to resuscitate her for 45minutes.

Chethana’s parents are now alleging negligence on part of the surgeons who they claim conducted the operation without proper equipment.

Speaking to Indian news outlet, The Tribune, her father Govinda Raj said his daughter was admitted to the hospital at 8:30am on Monday morning without his knowledge.

He only found out after the surgery had started, and has claimed there were no proper facilities in the ICU.

‘My daughter died due to the negligence of the hospital. The doctors have conducted surgery without parental consent and without proper equipment,’ he stated.

‘My daughter was hale and hearty. She was absolutely fine.’

He added to the publication: ‘Someone has suggested to her that she had more fat in the waist and without consulting any family member she had come for the surgery. I will initiate legal action against hospital authorities.’

Speaking to IndiaToday.in, Chethana’s uncle Rajappa said, ‘She is my younger brother’s daughter and she was acting in Kannada TV serials.

‘Somebody had told her to reduce weight as she appeared fat. So, she went to Shetty hospital to remove the excess fat.

‘The hospital is not equipped with an ICU and the surgery was done. After the surgery, water accumulated in her lungs. Later, they shifted her to another hospital nearby where she was declared “brought dead”‘.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/worl...sedgntp&cvid=5fd780e558944324beb0c9f789dc6e18
 
There's alot of casual racism in Pakistan no doubt about it, but I think it's mostly due to ignorance most of the time. I've never seen straight "I don't like dark skinned people" racism in Pakistan.
 
Back
Top