What's new

Donald Trump picks Brett Kavanaugh for Supreme Court

giri26

T20I Debutant
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Runs
8,474
Post of the Week
1
Washington (CNN) - President Donald Trump has nominated Brett Kavanaugh to join the US Supreme Court, setting the stage for a dramatic confirmation battle over a stalwart conservative who could shape the direction of the court for decades to come.

If confirmed, Kavanaugh would replace a frequent swing vote on the bench, retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy, who often sided with his liberal colleagues on issues such as abortion, affirmative action and LGBT rights.
Kavanaugh, 53, is a judge on the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit and Yale Law School graduate who previously served in both Bush administrations. He also worked on independent counsel Ken Starr's investigation of President Bill Clinton.

"What matters is not a judge's political views, but whether they can set aside those views to do what the law and the Constitution require. I am pleased to say I have found without doubt such a person," Trump said as he announced Kavanaugh's nomination at the White House Monday evening.

Trump called Kavanaugh "one of the finest and sharpest legal minds of our time," saying he is "considered a judge's judge and a true thought leader among his peers."

"Judge Kavanaugh has impeccable credentials, unsurpassed qualifications and a proven commitment to equal justice under the law," Trump said.
Kavanaugh will begin meeting with senators on Tuesday.

He has never expressed outright opposition to the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which made abortion legal nationwide, and similarly has no record on gay rights and same-sex marriage, but he will face tough questions from Democrats on both issues. Kavanaugh has also suggested that presidents be shielded from civil and criminal litigation until they leave office, an issue that could be front and center as Trump faces the investigations by special counsel Robert Mueller and potential civil challenges.

"If confirmed by the Senate, I will keep an open mind in every case," Kavanaugh said Monday at the White House.

GOP hoping for quick confirmation

The nomination is Trump's second to the nation's highest court, a rare presidential privilege that could seal a key part of Trump's legacy less than two years into his first term.

Trump last week spoke with seven candidates, all drawn from a shortlist compiled by the conservative Federalist Society, about the Supreme Court. The nomination also comes just before the President leaves for a critical trip to Britain, a NATO summit in Belgium and a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The White House is hoping the Senate moves quickly to confirm Kavanaugh before the midterm elections in November threaten to unfurl the narrow Republican majority in the chamber and nix the precious leverage the GOP holds over some red state Democrats up for reelection in 2018.

Trump's legislative affairs director Marc Short told reporters Monday night that the White House expects a confirmation vote before October 1, when the new Supreme Court term begins.

Democrats are warning that Trump's nominee would jeopardize some of progressives' most important policy priorities in recent decades -- including rulings that legalized abortion and same-sex marriage, as well as former President Barack Obama's health care law.

Republicans hold 51 seats in the Senate, though Arizona Sen. John McCain has been absent as he battles brain cancer. Trump's nominee can win confirmation with only Republican votes, but attention will quickly shift to two moderate GOP senators, Maine's Susan Collins and Alaska's Lisa Murkowski, who are supportive of abortion rights.

Trump also hopes to pressure several Democrats into voting to confirm his nominee. Three Democrats up for re-election in states Trump won by double digits in 2016 -- Indiana Sen. Joe Donnelly, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin and North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp -- voted "yes" on the confirmation of his first Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, who once held a court seat open for nearly a year before the 2016 election to keep President Barack Obama from filling it, lambasted Democrats for announcing their opposition before Trump had decided on a nominee.

"Justice Kennedy's resignation letter barely arrived in the President's hands before several Democratic colleagues began declaring their blanket opposition to anyone at all -- anyone -- that the President might name," McConnell said Monday.

The sharply negative Democratic responses to Kavanaugh's nomination indicated a pitched battle over his confirmation is coming this fall.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement that by selecting Kavanaugh, Trump "has put reproductive rights and freedoms and health care protections for millions of Americans on the judicial chopping block."

"This nomination could alter the balance of the court in favor of powerful special interests and against working families for a generation, and would take away labor, civil, and human rights from millions of Americans. We cannot let that happen," the New York Democrat said.

Red-state Democrats keep their distance

Trump had invited four Democrats from deep-red states -- likely the four best chances the White House has of attracting Democratic votes for Kavanaugh -- to Monday night's announcement.

But Alabama's Sen. Doug Jones, Indiana's Sen. Joe Donnelly, North Dakota's Sen. Heidi Heitkamp and West Virginia's Sen. Joe Manchin all declined the invitations.

Donnelly, Heitkamp and Manchin are up for re-election this fall, three of the five Democrats, along with Missouri's Sen. Claire McCaskill and Montana's Sen. Jon Tester, up for re-election in states Trump won by double digits in 2016.

Most of those Democrats issued tepid statements saying they will review Kavanaugh's record, without commenting on whether they will vote for or against his confirmation -- a position that breaks with their party's progressive flank, which is demanding an all-out battle, but also doesn't promise Trump any Democratic votes.

Donnelly said he would "carefully review and consider the record and qualifications." Tester said he looks forward to meeting Kavanaugh and called on senators in both parties to "put politics aside and do what's best for this nation."

Moderate Republicans also held their fire. Collins said she is waiting for Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and to meet the nominee in her office.

"I will conduct a careful, thorough vetting of the President's nominee to the Supreme Court, as I have done with the five previous Supreme Court Justices whom I have considered," she said in a statement.

Veteran of DC
Kavanaugh is a classic Washington insider with a deep conservative legal record.

He worked in the George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush administrations, serving the younger president when he was torn among finalists for a Supreme Court seat in 2005.

He also spent 12 years on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where his record would place him to Kennedy's right and more in ideological sync with Justice Samuel Alito, who has been a reliable conservative vote on the court.

Last October, Kavanaugh dissented when the full DC Circuit prevented the Trump administration from blocking a pregnant teenage migrant at the southern border from obtaining an abortion. Kavanaugh stressed that the "government has permissible interests in favoring fetal life, protecting the best interests of a minor, and refraining from facilitating abortion."

George W. Bush praised Trump's selection of Kavanaugh in a statement, calling his selection an "outstanding decision."

"Brett is a brilliant jurist who has faithfully applied the Constitution and laws throughout his 12 years on the D.C. Circuit. He is a fine husband, father, and friend -- and a man of the highest integrity," Bush said. "He will make a superb justice of the Supreme Court of the United States."

At the White House, Kavanaugh described his mother as influential in his legal path. After teaching high school history, she went to law school, became a prosecutor and later a state court judge during his youth, and he said he thinks of her as the real "Judge Kavanaugh."

"Her trademark line was, 'Use your common sense -- what rings true, what rings false.' That's good advice for a juror and for a son," he said.

Says presidents should be shielded from litigation while in office

No stranger to controversy, including on issues that resonate today, Kavanaugh worked for Starr's investigation of Clinton in the 1990s. That initial Whitewater real estate inquiry expanded into an investigation of Clinton's relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

The then 33-year-old Kavanaugh became a lead author of the 1998 Starr Report that detailed Clinton's sexual involvement with Lewinsky and laid out 11 grounds for Clinton's impeachment, including obstruction of justice and lying under oath. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives voted to impeach Clinton, but the GOP-controlled Senate acquitted him in 1999.

A decade later, after Kavanaugh had worked closely with George W. Bush, he wrote in a law review that he had new appreciation for the demands of the presidency and the toll any legal proceeding could take on the White House. He recommended presidents be shielded from civil and criminal litigation until they leave office.

"Having seen first-hand how complex and difficult that job is," he wrote, "I believe it vital that the President be able to focus on his never-ending tasks with as few distractions as possible." He acknowledged that blocking litigation would suggest the President was "above the law," but he added, "the point is not to put the President above the law or to eliminate checks on the President, but simply to defer litigation and investigations until the President is out of office."

Kavanaugh noted in the 2009 Minnesota Law Review piece that a check against a "bad-behaving or law-breaking President" would still exist. "If the President does something dastardly, the impeachment process is available."

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/07/09/politics/trump-supreme-court-pick/index.html
 
Now we get the relentless Trump deranged syndrome sufferers complaining.
 
Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh hearing rocked by 'mob rule'

The confirmation hearing for President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee has descended into "mob rule", a Republican senator said.

John Cornyn of Texas spoke out as Democrats demanded an adjournment and two dozen protesters were dragged out of the room in chaotic scenes.

Brett Kavanaugh faces four days before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

If approved, he would be expected to tilt the court's balance to the right.

Minutes after Mr Kavanaugh, 53, entered the committee rooms on Tuesday, the hearing was disrupted by angry shouts from members of the public and lawmakers alike.

The Trump administration has angered Democrats by refusing to release thousands of documents relating to Mr Kavanaugh's work for President George W Bush.

The White House has cited "constitutional privilege".

Senator Cory Booker appealed to Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley's "sense of decency and integrity", but the Iowa Republican refused to delay the process.

As protesters continued to be arrested, Texas Republican John Cornyn called this "the first confirmation hearing for a Supreme Court justice I've seen basically according to mob rule".

Mr Grassley bridled at the suggestion that he had lost control of the proceedings, and accused Democrats of tacitly encouraging the disruption.

He also threatened to continue hearings into the weekend, if delays continued.

The demonstrators - who were mostly women - shouted out that Mr Kavanaugh would allow President Trump to pardon himself. Others claimed he would let people with pre-existing medical conditions to be stripped of medical coverage.

Democrats have warned that Mr Trump's choice would usher in a more socially conservative approach to abortion, gay rights and gun control.

Senators on the committee were also due to hear from witnesses for and against the nominee.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45403324
 
Brett Kavanaugh: Key senators back embattled Supreme Court pick

Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court seat looks all but confirmed after he won the backing of key senators despite an FBI investigation into sexual assault allegations.

Republican Senator Susan Collins and Joe Manchin, a Democrat, both indicated their backing for the judge on Friday.

Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation would tilt America's highest court in favour of conservatives.

The court has the final say on issues such as abortion and gun control.

A final vote on whether Judge Kavanaugh will join the nine-member panel is scheduled for Saturday. If confirmed, the position is for life.

Hours before the undecided senators indicated their backing, the US Senate narrowly advanced President Donald Trump's nominee to a final vote by voting to strictly limit debate on the issue.

Friday's "cloture" vote - 51-49 in favour - was a test of support for the embattled nominee who has faced sexual assault allegations from several women, including Prof Christine Blasey Ford.

What did the Senators say?
Senator Collins ended hopes she would side with her Democratic colleagues in the final vote, telling Senate colleagues she did not believe the "charges can fairly prevent Judge Kavanaugh from serving on the court".

"The facts presented do not mean that Professor Ford was not sexually assaulted that night or at some other time but they do lead me to conclude that the allegations failed to meet the more likely than not standard," she said.

Senator Manchin, who is up for re-election in West Virginia, a traditionally Republican state that Mr Trump won by a landslide, told the Senate moments later he "found Judge Kavanaugh to be a qualified jurist who will follow the constitution and determine cases based on the legal findings before him".

What has the reaction been?
The reaction has been swift, with former president George HW Bush and White House press secretary Sarah Sanders both tweeting their support for Ms Collins.

Mr Manchin, however, has found himself in the firing line.

A liberal group which raises money for Democratic candidates, Priorities USA, immediately said it would not be giving any funds to his re-election campaign.

Outside, protesters shouted "shame on you" as Mr Manchin spoke to reporters about his decision.

Meanwhile, a tweet asking someone to run for Ms Collins' seat in Maine when it comes up for re-election in 2020 from former White House communication chief, Jen Psaki, had a swift response from former UN ambassador Susan Rice.

She later clarified she was "not making any announcements" but was " deeply disappointed in Senator Collins' vote for Kavanaugh".

Alaska's Lisa Murkowski - a Republican who voted against the nomination earlier on Friday - is yet to officially say which way she will vote on Saturday.

However, former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin tweeted she could "see 2022 from my house", inferring she would fight for her seat should she not side with her Republican colleagues in the vote to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.

Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation to the Supreme Court is all but certain. The Republican Party has the votes and the battle appears over. The political war, however, is just beginning.

Donald Trump's court pick generated a controversy that captured the nation's attention in a way that few political issues do. It generated daily headlines rivalled only by the US quadrennial presidential elections.

Now that the bombs have been thrown, it's time to assess the fallout.

What was the FBI inquiry about?
Judge Kavanaugh has faced sexual assault allegations from several women, most prominently from Prof Ford.

In public testimony last week Prof Ford said she had been assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh when they were both teenagers in 1982.

Judge Kavanaugh denied the claim - and allegations that he drank to the point of memory loss at the time - in a feisty confrontation with senators.

After the testimony, President Trump agreed to a new FBI inquiry.

Federal agents are believed to have spoken to five witnesses regarding Prof Ford's accusations and another four other witnesses involving a separate accusation by Deborah Ramirez, who said the nominee had exposed himself to her when they were both at Yale University. He denies Ms Ramirez's allegations, too.

Mr Trump and his fellow Republicans said the new FBI report had cleared their nominee.

But Democratic senators said it had been incomplete.

The lawyers of both women have also complained that several witnesses they had offered to the FBI to corroborate their claims had not been contacted at all.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45766729
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Very proud of the U.S. Senate for voting “YES” to advance the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh!</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1048226225196552193?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 5, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
A new low for America to see the President mocking a sexual assault victim.

https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/1047589105008295936?s=19

This "limited in scope" FBI investigation, for which the White House set the parameters, was wholly insufficient with neither Ford or Kavanaugh interviewed. The probe ignored testimonies from fellow classmates who came forward saying Kavanaugh was lying. But it achieved its purpose in providing cover for Republican Senators who can claim Kavanaugh has been exonerated.

Ford's recollection of the individuals present at the July 1st party matches those that Kavanaugh names. Even the GOP hack Rachel Mitchell (a sex crimes prosecuter whose job was seemingly to interrogate Ford not the accused) couldn't break Ford's credibility. Meanwhile, Kavanaugh's testimony had many inaccuracies and exposed his hypocrisy. He refused to take a polygraph test dismissing them as unreliable yet in one of his OWN judicial decisions he SUPPORTED the use of polygraph tests for federal appointments.

Then there's references to a girl from a nearby Catholic school named Renate Schroeder in the yearbook. Unbeknownst to Renate - nine members of the football team that Kavanaugh was a part of wrote they were "Renate Alumnius" - a reference Kavanaugh laughably claimed was a display of friendship and not a boast of sexual conquest. This poor girl didn't even know some of these players yet these jock bullies made her out to be a *****.

Look many people behaved like jerks in High School and if we dug up everyone's High School records not many would be in a job. But don't claim you were a pious soul who was in Church every Sunday who only focused on academics and athletics when you clearly were boozing and partying to excess ! If Kavanaugh admitted from the outset he horribly mistreated women and had a drink problem back in the day, but has learned from his mistakes then he would be a more sympathetic figure. Instead he lied over and again.
 
Last edited:
He was also openly hostile to the Democrats during the second round of the confirmation hearings. This hostility seriously calls into question his impartiality, which is a necessary attribute for a judge to possess, let alone the Cheif Justice of the SCOTUS. So does he have to recuse himself if a redistricting case comes up to the Court or if the Court finds itself in a situation similar to Bush v. Gore? And if he doesn't can we be sure that justice was served? What an utter mockery! Thanks again Trump.
 
At last common sense prevails. Let's hope this momentum carries on to the midterms.
 
Quite a comfortable confirmation when it actually came down to the voting - the result was never in doubt.

What is it that T.S. Eliot said about things ending not with a bang but with a whimper?

This is the most conservative bench that the Supreme Court has had in years.

The Republicans now have firm control of the Executive and Judicial branches of the government - and if they perform above expectations next month then Trump can continue to do whatever he wants until the Americans get rid, which should be in 2020 but may yet be in 2024 at this rate.
 
I think Trump is a two-term President. His base is not getting any smaller and he keeps holding rallies. Meanwhile the US economy is doing really well.
 
Quite a comfortable confirmation when it actually came down to the voting - the result was never in doubt.

What is it that T.S. Eliot said about things ending not with a bang but with a whimper?

This is the most conservative bench that the Supreme Court has had in years.

The Republicans now have firm control of the Executive and Judicial branches of the government - and if they perform above expectations next month then Trump can continue to do whatever he wants until the Americans get rid, which should be in 2020 but may yet be in 2024 at this rate.

Unlike the President who has a fixed term (maximum 8 years), the judges are appointed for life, the ramifications of this decision will continue for much longer after Trump is gone.
 
Dr Ford is now scared to go home because of death threats.

Make America Hate Again.
 
Back
Top