What's new

Donald Trump withdraws US from Iran nuclear deal [Post #21]

Strike Rate

Senior T20I Player
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Runs
19,788
A deal on limiting Iran's nuclear programme in return for sanctions relief has been reached at talks in Vienna, diplomats say.

The Associated Press cited an unnamed Western diplomat as saying final obstacles had been cleared.

The EU announced a "final plenary" meeting at 08:30 GMT, followed by a news conference.

Six world powers including the US, Russia and the UK have been negotiating with Iran at the talks.

Reuters cited two unnamed Iranian diplomats early on Tuesday as saying a deal had been reached.

"All the hard work has paid off and we sealed a deal. God bless our people," it quoted one of the diplomats as saying.

The so-called P5+1 - the US, UK, France, China and Russia plus Germany - want Iran to scale back its sensitive nuclear activities to ensure that it cannot build a nuclear weapon.

Iran, which wants crippling international sanctions lifted, has always insisted that its nuclear work is peaceful.


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33518524
 
Yahoo must be somewhere crying somewhere. He tried his best to stop the deal but Israeli leadership has no credibility these days.
 
:))) This is what he posted on his twitter.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In Vienna, world powers concede more and more to Iran. In Tehran, demonstrators burn American & Israeli flags. <a href="http://t.co/4pQRvQmfwL">pic.twitter.com/4pQRvQmfwL</a></p>— בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) <a href="https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/619978651799416832">July 11, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Good news. The trinity of Saudi Arabia-Israel-Republicans already kicking up a fuss about it.
 
:))) This is what he posted on his twitter.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In Vienna, world powers concede more and more to Iran. In Tehran, demonstrators burn American & Israeli flags. <a href="http://t.co/4pQRvQmfwL">pic.twitter.com/4pQRvQmfwL</a></p>— בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) <a href="https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/619978651799416832">July 11, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Shouldn't he be happy that Irani people are against the deal?
 
Shouldn't he be happy that Irani people are against the deal?

I am sure some are, just like some NeoCons and Israelis. But I doubt most Iranis are against this deal since the lower and middle class is usually the victim of sanctions. So most Iranis should be happy unless they love Ayatollah so blindly.
 
Why are Iranians against the deal?

Only the hardliners are against it, their youth wants the deal to happen as it opens new opportunities for them. Pictures posted by Netanyahu should't be taken as the opinion of all Iranians. They burn the flags of Saudis, Israelis and US every year on Qudas day and this will probably not stop even after the deal. But those affected by the sanctions for sure want the deal to happen. Here is one example
Saeed, a 29-year-old who works in publishing and the printing business, said the news has re-energised him and his co-workers. “I have a good feeling, and our business will gain from this because all the materials and equipment in our business comes from abroad. If the dollar gets cheaper, business will certainly go up,” he said.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/iranians-celebrate-nuclear-deal-tehran
 
Early reports say the deal will NOT allow at-will access to Iran's nuclear facilities. But Obama made a statement saying this deal is not based on trust but on verification. If early reports are true, how can any verification be done without at-will access? I don't trust the Iranians to hold true and not make nuclear weapons.

Obama, who was so hell-bent on closing any deal, took a mis-step just to cement his legacy as the president who "solved" middle-east. The consequences will be felt in the next 10 years or so. The majority of positives from lifting of sanctions will not go to ordinary Iranians but the regime. Expect more Iranian influence, more proxy wars and more Sunni-Shia conflicts in the region.

Also, the deal still has to pass through Republican-controlled Congress in 60 days.
 
Only the hardliners are against it, their youth wants the deal to happen as it opens new opportunities for them. Pictures posted by Netanyahu should't be taken as the opinion of all Iranians. They burn the flags of Saudis, Israelis and US every year on Qudas day and this will probably not stop even after the deal. But those affected by the sanctions for sure want the deal to happen. Here is one example

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/iranians-celebrate-nuclear-deal-tehran

Yeh its common sense for wanting this deal to go through, but what exactly do the hardliners have against it though?
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-34159461

Washington will remember the first visit of Saudi Arabia's King Salman for its royal extravagance.

The massive fleet of luxury cars for the hundreds of officials who accompanied the monarch. The full buy-out of the 222-room Four Seasons Hotel, reportedly outfitted with red carpets and gold-painted furniture for the occasion.

But the message the US and Saudi leaders wanted to send was one of a resilient relationship. "Strong", "deep" and "abiding" were some of the words they used.

Rhetoric aside, it was clear the Saudis had decided to move beyond deep reservations about the Iran nuclear deal which have strained relations with the Obama administration in recent months.

At the height of tensions in May, the king refused President Obama's invitation to visit, although the Saudis insisted it wasn't a snub.
Since then, negotiations on the deal have concluded successfully and, perhaps recognising a fait accompli, Riyadh expressed cautious support.

But Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir now gave ringing endorsement. After consulting US officials and European allies for two months, the Saudis were satisfied, he said, that the agreement would effectively contain Iran's nuclear programme.
Ha ! Typical Saudis - they'll issue threats and moan but ultimately will they lift a finger against their paymasters ?

Hell no. Good news stateside is that it looks like there'll be enough Democratic support in Congress that'll allow the deal to pass without the need for a Presidential veto when Republican-controlled Congress as expected will vote it down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So we can expect oil prices to fall further from now.

Iran Oil capacity is low (2 mln barrels per day) and will need atleast 18-24 months for infrastructure to come upto the level where it will have an impact on prices.

There is going to be a lot of investment there so for any adventurous people there will be a lot of jobs opening up soon over there :))
 
Iran Oil capacity is low (2 mln barrels per day) and will need atleast 18-24 months for infrastructure to come upto the level where it will have an impact on prices.

Yes but even the hint of Iran entering the oil market noticed more decrease in oil prices recently?
 
I read somewhere, "The best compromise pleases no one"

Seems apt on the reactions of the nuts from Iran, Israel and US!
 
2 years since the Iran nuclear deal - has all hell broken loose yet ? Has Israel been wiped off the map by the Ayatollahs yet ? All the scaremongering has been proven wrong.

Obama made his share of mistakes but one of the best things he did was to defy the GOP neocons and Saudi-Israel lobby by getting this done.

Even the Trump administration accepts Iran is complying with the agreement !

Trump administration expected to certify Iran is compliant with Obama's nuclear deal

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/13/politics/trump-iran-deal-certify/index.html

Washington (CNN) The Trump administration is expected to re-certify that Iran is complying with guidelines set by former President Barack Obama's nuclear deal, multiple Trump administration officials tell CNN, meaning President Donald Trump -- at least for the time being -- will go along with a deal he once promised to "tear up."

Trump is required to certify Iran's compliance every 90 days and the officials said the President is expected to do so, cautioning, however, that Trump can be unpredictable and could change his mind at the last minute. Trump, the officials said, is taking his cues from Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who has argued that sticking to the deal is the best way to verify Iranian compliance. The Trump administration last certified the agreement in April.

Obama's deal with Iran was a frequent focus of Trump's ire on the campaign trail. He railed against it at events snf said dismantling it was his "number one priority." A video posted to his Instagram account said the deal proved it was "time for a real negotiator" to handle Iran.

As President, Trump tweeted in February that Iran "should have been thankful for the terrible deal the U.S. made with them!" And in April he said the country was "not living up to the spirit of the agreement."

"I think they are doing a tremendous disservice to an agreement that was signed," he said. "It was a terrible agreement."

One official explained Trump's plan to certify the deal was more of a requirement than something the President wanted to do.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I will be announcing my decision on the Iran Deal tomorrow from the White House at 2:00pm.</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/993562242124865536?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 7, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Seems like he is going to withdraw from the nuclear deal. The nuclear deal involved multiple countries so would they be willing to go along with Trump? In the end the average Iranian will pay the price if the sanctions are back.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I will be announcing my decision on the Iran Deal tomorrow from the White House at 2:00pm.</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/993562242124865536?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 7, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Seems like he is going to withdraw from the nuclear deal. The nuclear deal involved multiple countries so would they be willing to go along with Trump? In the end the average Iranian will pay the price if the sanctions are back.

we all will pay price because withdraw from Iran deal means high oil price
 
World holds breath for Trump's Iran deal decision

Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump on Tuesday can land his most devastating blow yet on the legacy of Barack Obama, but a move to pull out of the Iran nuclear deal could also spark a dangerous global crisis.

The decision could mark a signature moment for Trump's presidency.
It gives him the chance to cement his "America First" philosophy but risks triggering unknowable consequences that in a worst case scenario could lead to war with Iran.

The decision gives the President a choice. Does he follow his instincts and honor a campaign promise to his loyal political base? Or does he risk dealing a severe rebuke to US allies who back the deal by re-imposing US sanctions on Iran?
Alternatively, he could claim the headline of refusing to continue waiving sanctions against Iran, but stop short of imposing new punishments immediately. That could keep open a narrow window for America's European allies to continue trying to broker a broader deal that could keep Trump on board.
Given that Trump's gut usually wins out over his concern for America's friends or complicated calculations of geopolitical ramifications down the road, it's no surprise most people think he will pull out of the deal.

"It's pretty obvious to me that unless something changes in the next few days, I believe the President will not waive the sanctions," CNN's Jim Sciutto quoted a European diplomat as saying.
"And that will have various consequences that I think we have yet to fully to understand and spell out."
Leaving the deal would represent another sharp turn away from the multilateral diplomacy that underpinned Obama's foreign policy and America's approach to the world for much of the 20th Century.
It would also introduce an illogical note into Trump's own diplomatic strategy, since he would be withdrawing from one nuclear deal with a US enemy, while trying to negotiate another, with North Korea.
'Insane' and 'ridiculous'
Yet Trump, who last month called the deal "insane" and "ridiculous" is notoriously unpredictable. He could still spring a surprise.
So all eyes in Washington, Tehran, Beijing, Moscow and EU capitals will be focused on the White House at 2 p.m. ET when he will stand in the global spotlight -- where he loves to be -- to make his announcement.
Trump has been teasing his decision for days and may have given a hint of his intentions on Monday when he slammed former secretary of state John Kerry and his reported initiative to save the deal.
"The United States does not need John Kerry's possibly illegal Shadow Diplomacy on the very badly negotiated Iran Deal. He was the one that created this MESS in the first place!" Trump tweeted.

If Trump does decide to pull out of the Iran agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, it will be because he thinks it's the "worst deal in history."
The President has frequently misrepresented the terms of the deal that froze Iran's nuclear program and complained that it does not halt Tehran's missile tests or power moves in the Middle East.
He repeatedly brings up the billions of dollars in unfrozen Iranian assets and funds held in escrow that were returned to the Islamic Republic after the deal was agreed in 2015.
Trump slams Kerry over 'shadow diplomacy' to save Iran deal

Obama's reasoning was that the prospect of an Iranian nuclear weapon was so dangerous that a deal to stop Tehran short of a weapons threshold was the most urgent priority.

Deal supporters say that the pact has stretched the "break out" time Iran would need to race to a bomb to at least a year, has mothballed most of its centrifuges and all but eradicated its uranium stockpile.

"Now that these handcuffs are in place, I see no possible advantage in casting them aside. Only Iran would gain from abandoning the restrictions on its nuclear program," British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson wrote in the New York Times on Sunday.

But critics say the deal includes sunset clauses that will eventually allow Iran to resume the production of highly enriched uranium that could be used for weapons.

The President promised to kill the deal on the campaign trail but allowed himself to be persuaded by cabinet members and allies several times to recertify Iran's compliance, to his evident fury.

But now, with a new foreign policy team including national security adviser John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who also oppose the deal, the President may have a freer hand.

Boris Johnson takes to Fox News in last-ditch effort to save Iran deal


Still, some Republicans in the national security establishment argue that the consequences of leaving could be worse than staying in.

Defense Secretary James Mattis last month told the Senate Armed Services committee that the verification provisions in the pact were "pretty robust" though he did not publicly back the deal.

Despite his criticism of the deal, neither Trump nor his aides have been able to say that Iran is infringing the agreement.

And there has been no detailed explanation from the administration about what happens next if the US tears it up.

Pulling out of the JCPOA would risk a serious split with leaders of America's traditional European allies, who have trekked to Washington in recent weeks to flatter, cajole and warn Trump.

'Walking away with no Plan B

Western diplomats have been trying for months to get Trump to stay in the deal or to negotiate measures on missiles and constraining Iran's geopolitical push that could stand alongside the Iran deal.

French President Emmanuel Macron raised the carrot of a "new" deal during a state visit to the White House last month, hoping to get around the President's antipathy to a pact that rates as his predecessor's biggest foreign policy achievement.

But privately, foreign diplomats have confided that the biggest problem with the agreement is the visceral distaste the President harbors towards anything that his predecessor achieved.

That's one reason why some observers believe that the decision on the Iran agreement is more dictated by politics than statesmanship.
"This agreement is highly flawed but it is functional," said Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East peace negotiator for Democratic and Republican presidents, this month on CNN.

US and Israeli officials intensify the drumbeat against Iran
US and Israeli officials

"Walking away from it without a Plan B I think is a political interest of the President but it is not in the national interest."

Iran has said there can be no renegotiation of the nuclear deal, a position shared by Russia and China, two other signatories.

If Trump does decide to pull out of the deal, his speech will be closely watched for details that could dictate what happens next.

He could simply say that the US does not intend to comply any longer and reimpose sanctions on Iran that were lifted in 2015. If he does not impose sanctions immediately, that could leave a small window for European allies to continue seeking a compromise.

If Trump does slap sanctions back on Iran right away, it could give European states an unpalatable dilemma -- do they follow suit or refuse in a move that could split the transatlantic alliance wide open?
Trump's move will also pose choices for Iran.

With its hobbled economy, Tehran could announce it is sticking with the deal in the hope of accruing the benefits of expanded trade with European firms -- and hope to split the US and Europe.

Or it could make a more aggressive move and start to enrich nuclear fuel again, a step that could force European states to reimpose their own sanctions and could precipitate a major international crisis.

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/05/08/politics/donald-trump-iran-deal/index.html
 
Trump announces he will withdraw from Iran nuclear deal.

Another act of diplomatic vandalism but unsurprising given the hawks he's surrounded himself with.

Iran is COMPLYING with the deal and the IAEA have inspected their facilities but because the deal was an Obama creation this petty manchild must do the opposite despite probably never even having read a paragraph of the deal.

Rouhani has made to look a fool and will suffer politically at home - which Iranian leader in their right mind will now engage with the wider world on the issue of nukes ? Why should North Korea now make a similar arrangement ?
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Trump: "The United States no longer makes empty threats. When I make promises, I keep them." <a href="https://t.co/rkk9crS8BH">https://t.co/rkk9crS8BH</a></p>— Meg Wagner (@megwagner) <a href="https://twitter.com/megwagner/status/993919570984419328?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">France, Germany, and the UK regret the U.S. decision to leave the JCPOA. The nuclear non-proliferation regime is at stake.</p>— Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) <a href="https://twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/993920765060878336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
No one including the European powers had a problem except for Trump.
 
This is no surprise Who expected any sensible decisions from this buffoon?
 
No one including the European powers had a problem except for Trump.
Because it's an Obama legacy. Trump is doing his utmost to wipe out anything and everything that will be / could be remembered in history as an Obama achievement. Trump hates anything Obama. Hence PeeGate.

And of course both Israel and Saudi Arabia also opposed the deal for their own reasons.
 
Trump: "The United States no longer makes empty threats. When I make promises, I keep them."

Well, Trump said he would get Shakil Afridi freed in 24 hour or something after coming in to power!:fizz
 
Trump further announced that Washington's chief diplomat Mike Pompeo is on his way to North Korea to prepare for a landmark nuclear summit.

“At this very moment, Secretary Pompeo is on his way to North Korea in preparation for my upcoming meeting with Kim Jong Un,” Trump said, in a White House address.

Pompeo, who met Kim in Pyongyang last month while he was still director of the CIA, will arrive in the North in “virtually an hour,” Trump said.

In addition to planning the summit, due later this month or early in June, Pompeo has been pressing the regime to release three detained US citizens.

So, Mr Pompeo going to North Korea for talks while his President broke US government's agreement with Iran and other countries.
 
On foreign policy he ranges from the sublime to the ridiculous, and there are always more short-sighted decisions than shrewd ones. For every peace brokered with North Korea, there is a clash with Iran and recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
 
Because it's an Obama legacy. Trump is doing his utmost to wipe out anything and everything that will be / could be remembered in history as an Obama achievement. Trump hates anything Obama. Hence PeeGate.

And of course both Israel and Saudi Arabia also opposed the deal for their own reasons.

This. The Republicans still can't get over the fact that a Black man did few things right..they will wipe out as much as they can.
 
This. The Republicans still can't get over the fact that a Black man did few things right..they will wipe out as much as they can.

Trump already deserves the Nobel after helping the historic Korean summit. Many times better than his predecessor who got the nobel just for rhetoric and was shameless enough to accept it.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">"If Iran is serious, they will sit down and negotiate. We'll see how serious they are. And as it relates to our allies, we're going to work very closely with them." - Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin reacts to Trump withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal <a href="https://t.co/GvtqqtTHe5">https://t.co/GvtqqtTHe5</a> <a href="https://t.co/51IMjQKoCp">pic.twitter.com/51IMjQKoCp</a></p>— OutFrontCNN (@OutFrontCNN) <a href="https://twitter.com/OutFrontCNN/status/994005013595860992?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 9, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Saudi Arabia, in a statement, also said:

The Kingdom reaffirms its support of the strategy previously announced by President Trump towards Iran, and hopes the international community will take a firm and unified stance against the Iranian regime, and its destabilizing aggression in the region, its support to terrorist groups, particularly Hizbollah and the Houthis militias, and its support of the Assad regime—who has committed heinous crimes against its people that led to the death of more than half a million civilians, including through the use of chemical weapons.
 
Here's what lawmakers are saying:

Sen. Mark Warner (D-Virginia): In a statement, he said that such a move drives "a wedge between us and our allies."

Sen. Bob Menendez (D-New Jersey): He said it was "a huge mistake to withdraw without a plan."
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Virginia): "I think he will be driving the wedge between the United States and our European allies," he said.

Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio): "Without proof that Iran is in violation of the agreement, it is a mistake to fully withdraw from this deal," he said in a statement.

Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tennessee): He said it was disappointing the White House couldn't reach an agreement with US allies, but is confident the President will work for a better deal.

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine): She said the Iran deal had been flawed, but she preferred an approach where the U.S would "remedy those flaws" with allies rather than walking away all together.
 
Turkey's president says he fears "new crises" will break out in the region

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan told CNN that he fears that “new crises” will break out in the Middle East as a result of the US abandoning the Iran deal.

“We don’t need new crises in the region,” Erdoğan told CNN’s Becky Anderson, adding that President Trump's decision is not just going to impact the region, but the entire world.

Erdoğan said Trump’s move will put the entire world economy at stake.

“That is the reason why as Turkey, we will be hit … and the United States might gain some certain positivity out of the withdrawal of this…or the rising oil prices … but many of the countries, in poverty, will be hit even harder and deeper,” he said.

When asked if he has concerns of a geopolitical war breaking out as a result, Erdoğan said, “that’s not what we would wish to see, of course … this is not what we'd like to expect."

Erdoğan said Trump should have respected the agreement, signed by the previous administration.

“This is not how the international mechanisms work," he said. "International covenants and international conventions, cannot be annulled upon will. If any document is bearing your signature, you need to respect that. You need to abide by that.”

https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-iran-nuclear-deal/
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Republican Senator Jeff Flake on President Trump withdrawing the US from the Iran nuclear deal: “I just don’t think it’s a wise move” <a href="https://t.co/zQdPdgKW7J">https://t.co/zQdPdgKW7J</a> <a href="https://t.co/m0BpkdpKyn">pic.twitter.com/m0BpkdpKyn</a></p>— The Lead CNN (@TheLeadCNN) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheLeadCNN/status/993947173157978112?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
On foreign policy he ranges from the sublime to the ridiculous, and there are always more short-sighted decisions than shrewd ones. For every peace brokered with North Korea, there is a clash with Iran and recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

Correct me if I'm wrong James but America has always recognised Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
 
Stupid move. How will he convince NoKo to sign on a deal now that he has withdrawn from his predecessors deal with Iran?

The europeans will continue to work with Iran and so will the other major economies. How many will be sanctioned by US now?

Trump has put all his eggs in the Saudi basket.
 
I have to agree with Trump.

How can you have a deal where one country says it will not do something unless other countries give them what they want.

If Iran are going to make nuclear bombs then they will also make themselves a nuclear target.

If at anytime Iran decides to resume making nuclear bombs then all these deals would have been a big waste of time and we all know that at some point Iran is going to make nuclear bombs.
 
I have to agree with Trump.

How can you have a deal where one country says it will not do something unless other countries give them what they want.

If Iran are going to make nuclear bombs then they will also make themselves a nuclear target.

If at anytime Iran decides to resume making nuclear bombs then all these deals would have been a big waste of time and we all know that at some point Iran is going to make nuclear bombs.

So they should. There's no reason to believe that Iran will be more irresponsible as a nuclear power than any other country, if anything nuclear weapons have proven to be a great deterrent. Not that I'm under any illusion that weapons of mass destruction are a bad thing, but when other hostile countries have them, they are a necessity.

Western powers should have more faith in their own belief systems to overcome ideological differences over the next century. Nuclear one-upmanship is not the way forward.
 
So they should. There's no reason to believe that Iran will be more irresponsible as a nuclear power than any other country, if anything nuclear weapons have proven to be a great deterrent. Not that I'm under any illusion that weapons of mass destruction are a bad thing, but when other hostile countries have them, they are a necessity.

Western powers should have more faith in their own belief systems to overcome ideological differences over the next century. Nuclear one-upmanship is not the way forward.

Plenty of Western powers do not have nuclear weapons, its not a west v east situation.
 
I guess you could if its your agenda to make it east v west.

I don't make the agenda, Donald Trump does. I think you are taking what I said out of context, obviously in this case America is a western country and Iran is an eastern one, but there's nothing to say every western country has to fall in line with USA.
 
Saudi Arabia, in a statement, also said:

The Kingdom reaffirms its support of the strategy previously announced by President Trump towards Iran, and hopes the international community will take a firm and unified stance against the Iranian regime, and its destabilizing aggression in the region, its support to terrorist groups, particularly Hizbollah and the Houthis militias, and its support of the Assad regime—who has committed heinous crimes against its people that led to the death of more than half a million civilians, including through the use of chemical weapons.
And of course Saudi Arabia financed all the jihadist groups fighting Assad's regime as well as each other, whilst killing civilians in the process, often deliberately, should be completely ignored. As should the fact that the Saudi Air Force is using the peoples of Yemen as target practice whilst at the same time the Saudi Navy and Air Force is blockading their seaports and stopping food and medicines reaching the starving civilians.
 
I have to agree with Trump.

How can you have a deal where one country says it will not do something unless other countries give them what they want.

If Iran are going to make nuclear bombs then they will also make themselves a nuclear target.

If at anytime Iran decides to resume making nuclear bombs then all these deals would have been a big waste of time and we all know that at some point Iran is going to make nuclear bombs.

What?

Iran decided not to pursue their plans of developing nuclear weapons so that sanctions against Iran could be lifted. They could once again have access to $100bn worth of assets that were frozen.

Are you suggesting countries should continue to impose sanctions against Iran and isolate them from the world for no reason?

FYI Iran reduced their uranium stock pile by 98% and have so far complied with all of the agreement under the close watch of the IAEA.

What a delusional war-mongering white supremacist thought process.
 
On foreign policy he ranges from the sublime to the ridiculous, and there are always more short-sighted decisions than shrewd ones. For every peace brokered with North Korea, there is a clash with Iran and recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

He got lucky with North Korea because they didn't call his bluff. It's quite obvious Trump is more concerned with deflecting attention away from his collusion with Russia and towards the boogeyman. He tried his best to make North Korea the boogeyman and it worked for a bit until North Korea realized that this man would stop at nothing even if it meant going to war. So North Korea decided to mend their relations with South Korea.

Now he has turned his attention towards Iran. In this situation, he has the big players of the region (Saudi and Israel) backing him for their own selfish agendas.
 
He got lucky with North Korea because they didn't call his bluff. It's quite obvious Trump is more concerned with deflecting attention away from his collusion with Russia and towards the boogeyman. He tried his best to make North Korea the boogeyman and it worked for a bit until North Korea realized that this man would stop at nothing even if it meant going to war. So North Korea decided to mend their relations with South Korea.

Now he has turned his attention towards Iran. In this situation, he has the big players of the region (Saudi and Israel) backing him for their own selfish agendas.

Yes, North Korea had a little do with the Trump, it was the NK leader who made the difference.


Iran should get the bomb now and do it quickly. Once it has nuclear weapons capability it will stop Zionist warmongers from attacking it and they will have to change their tune.
 
America should start by cleaning up its own nuclear stockpile if it really wants a nuclear free world.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong James but America has always recognised Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

I thought it was Tel Aviv until Trump’s statement. (Apologies if I am wrong.)
 
Correct me if I'm wrong James but America has always recognised Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

I thought it was Tel Aviv until Trump’s statement. (Apologies if I am wrong.)

Slightly more complicated.

"In 1995, Congress passed the Jerusalem Embassy Act, which declared that "Jerusalem should be recognized as the capital of the State of Israel."[14] The bill also stated that the American embassy should move to Jerusalem within five years.[13] Backing the legislation was viewed by some as reflecting American domestic politics. Clinton opposed the Jerusalem Embassy Act and signed a waiver every six month delaying the move.[13]

During the 2000 election campaign, George W. Bush criticized Clinton for not moving the embassy as he had promised to do, and said he planned on initiating the process himself as soon as he was elected. However, once he took office, he backed down on his promise.[13]

In 2008, then Democratic candidate Barack Obama called Jerusalem the 'capital of Israel'. On June 4, 2008, Obama told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), in his first foreign policy speech after capturing the Democratic nomination the day before, that "Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided." However, he backtracked almost immediately, saying "Well, obviously, it's going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues. And Jerusalem will be part of those negotiations."[15]

During the 2016 US Presidential election, one of Trump's campaign promises was to move the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, which he described as the "eternal capital of the Jewish people."[16] On June 1, 2017, Trump signed a waiver on the Jerusalem Embassy Act, delaying the move of the US embassy to Jerusalem for another six months, as had every president before him since 1995. The White House stated that this would help them negotiate a deal between Israel and Palestine, and that the promised move would come at a later time.[17]"

"On December 6, 2017 President Trump formally recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and stated that the American embassy would be moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem."


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_recognition_of_Jerusalem_as_capital_of_Israel
 
Stupid move. How will he convince NoKo to sign on a deal now that he has withdrawn from his predecessors deal with Iran?

Because when he makes promises, he keeps them.

So far, apart from getting Mexico to pay for the wall, he has kept all his major campaign promises:

- promised to ban Muslims from entering (partial check)
- promised to repeal Obamacare (check)
- promised tax cuts (check)
- promised to move the US embassy to Jerusalem (check)
- promised to rip up the Iran deal (check)

5 out 6 promises kept, that is a strike rate of 83.33.

The europeans will continue to work with Iran and so will the other major economies. How many will be sanctioned by US now?

US is allowing 90-180 days for companies to wind their business operations down. US Ambassador to Germany has already tweeted that German companies will be punished if they don't adhere:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">As <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> said, US sanctions will target critical sectors of Iran’s economy. German companies doing business in Iran should wind down operations immediately.</p>— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) <a href="https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/993924107212394496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Trump has put all his eggs in the Saudi basket.

Saudis are irrelevant here (and everywhere). They are just bandwagon fans who've jumped on the anti Iran train.

However, if the Iranians now go full steam ahead with nuclearization, MbS or other GCC nations might use this a perfect excuse to attempt their own nuclear arsenals.

At the end of the day, Trump is widely touted to get a Nobel Peace prize...Macron, Merkel, May, et al cannot brag about the same.
 
Because when he makes promises, he keeps them.

So far, apart from getting Mexico to pay for the wall, he has kept all his major campaign promises:

- promised to ban Muslims from entering (partial check)
- promised to repeal Obamacare (check)
- promised tax cuts (check)
- promised to move the US embassy to Jerusalem (check)
- promised to rip up the Iran deal (check)

5 out 6 promises kept, that is a strike rate of 83.33.

Obamacare is not repealed.
 
Because when he makes promises, he keeps them.

So far, apart from getting Mexico to pay for the wall, he has kept all his major campaign promises:

- promised to ban Muslims from entering (partial check)
- promised to repeal Obamacare (check)
- promised tax cuts (check)
- promised to move the US embassy to Jerusalem (check)
- promised to rip up the Iran deal (check)

5 out 6 promises kept, that is a strike rate of 83.33.



US is allowing 90-180 days for companies to wind their business operations down. US Ambassador to Germany has already tweeted that German companies will be punished if they don't adhere:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">As <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@realDonaldTrump</a> said, US sanctions will target critical sectors of Iran’s economy. German companies doing business in Iran should wind down operations immediately.</p>— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) <a href="https://twitter.com/RichardGrenell/status/993924107212394496?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>




Saudis are irrelevant here (and everywhere). They are just bandwagon fans who've jumped on the anti Iran train.

However, if the Iranians now go full steam ahead with nuclearization, MbS or other GCC nations might use this a perfect excuse to attempt their own nuclear arsenals.

At the end of the day, Trump is widely touted to get a Nobel Peace prize...Macron, Merkel, May, et al cannot brag about the same.

He will win the next Presidential Election.
 
He will win the next Presidential Election.

Inclined to agree with this. I can’t see any rising Democrats that could take his place tomorrow, and it is even less likely that the Republicans will turf him out for somebody else. The Americans will vote him back in because they don’t know who else to choose. It is 2.5 years to the next voting day and that isn’t too long really.
 
we all will pay price because withdraw from Iran deal means high oil price

You were right.
Global oil supplies were already getting tight before Trump vowed on Tuesday to exit the Iran nuclear deal and impose "powerful" sanctions on the OPEC nation.

Energy industry insiders say Trump's tough stance on Iran will probably keep oil and gasoline prices higher than they would otherwise be.

Iran ramped up its oil production by 1 million barrels per day after sanctions were lifted in early 2016. At least some of that oil will now be pulled from the market — at a time when oil prices are already rising because of production cuts by OPEC and Russia as well as instability in Venezuela.
http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/08/investing/oil-prices-trump-iran-sanctions/index.html
 
Trump just accelerated Iran’s implosion. He won’t like the results.
President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the nuclear deal signed with Iran and the European powers in 2015 doesn’t just make it likelier that Iran, too, will abandon the treaty and renew its push to make a bomb. It could also determine if the social unrest sweeping the Islamic Republic deepens and further destabilizes the regime. The government is facing perhaps its greatest opposition nationwide since the 1979 Islamic revolution. Trump’s decision will change how that story plays out in ways that will further destabilize the regime while giving conservatives more power for now.

The U.S. decision is sure to exacerbate Iran’s economic crisis, promoting more political unrest. Although the Iranian regime will blame the United States for an even greater decline of its economy if Washington reimposes sanctions, much of Iranian society no longer believes the claims of the regime. (During recent demonstrations, one chant from the protesters was: “Our enemy is here [at home]. It is not America.”)

There is no doubt the Iranian economy is faltering. According to the BBC, in real terms, Iranians have become 15 percent poorer during the past decade. While unemployment stands at an estimated 15 to 20 percent in urban centers such as Tehran, it is 60 percent in some rural areas. Unemployment for young people, who make up half of Iran’s population, is at 40 percent, the New York Times reported.

The value of the Iranian currency, the rial, has plummeted from 36,000 to the U.S. dollar, when President Hassan Rouhani took power in 2013, to 60,000 to the dollar today. According to Iranian sources, Iran’s Central Bank has restricted Iranians from withdrawing dollars from their private bank accounts because there is a shortage of foreign currency, forcing Iran to funnel U.S. dollars into the country from Iraq, where they are bought at reduced prices at auction. In 2017, the Iraqi Central Bank sold 15.7 billion in U.S. dollars, and previous media reports, such as one by Reuters, have indicated that much of the money sold at auction winds up in Iran and Syria.

Trump says the plan is to reimpose sanctions, and when that happens, Iran will have more difficulty selling its oil on the world market, particularly in Europe, where firms are afraid of being penalized by U.S. sanctions. Even if sanctions are not imposed now (the process is complicated), foreign investors will be less likely to take a risk by spending money in a country living under imminent threat of U.S. sanctions.

Iran sells approximately 2.62 million barrels of crude oil per day. Approximately 38 percent of these sales are to European companies, with the majority of sales going to patrons in Asia, according to the Financial Tribune, an Iranian economic publication. As foreign investors divert away from new investments in Iran, the country may be able to make up some of its lost sales by selling to China and India. (Before the nuclear deal was signed, it shipped just under 1 million barrels per day to Asia.) But Iran would be forced to do so at a discount. A reduction of oil sales, and thus a decline in foreign currency reserves, will make it difficult for Iran to meet its balance of payment obligations.
The European Union has suggested that it could put in place regulations to protect its firms doing business in Iran amid a new U.S. sanctions regime. France and Germany, also signatories to the deal, indicated this week that they would remain in the deal regardless of the U.S. decision.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2018/05/08/trump-just-accelerated-irans-implosion-he-wont-like-the-results/?noredirect=on
 
Inclined to agree with this. I can’t see any rising Democrats that could take his place tomorrow, and it is even less likely that the Republicans will turf him out for somebody else. The Americans will vote him back in because they don’t know who else to choose. It is 2.5 years to the next voting day and that isn’t too long really.

Not just that. By default, he will be the only republican running for re-election. And, now he has earned the bragging right of keeping his promise regardless of how stupid those promises are. Bringing back American prisoners from North Korea, etc has and will help him a great deal. Economy is doing great, not because of him, that’s all Obama but he will claim it was all due to his policies.

I agree, I don’t know what narrative can Democrats argue against, and it’s not the moral narrative that Demoracte can run on because that didn’t do anything in last election.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BREAKING?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BREAKING</a> Saudis will seek nuclear weapon if Iran does, minister says</p>— AFP news agency (@AFP) <a href="https://twitter.com/AFP/status/994274695565504514?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 9, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Will Trump and Yahoo allow the Saudis to acquire nukes to counter Iran?
 
Well it looks like its kicking off now

Israel hitting syria

And syrian army and iranians firing into occupied golan
 
What?

Iran decided not to pursue their plans of developing nuclear weapons so that sanctions against Iran could be lifted. They could once again have access to $100bn worth of assets that were frozen.

Are you suggesting countries should continue to impose sanctions against Iran and isolate them from the world for no reason?

FYI Iran reduced their uranium stock pile by 98% and have so far complied with all of the agreement under the close watch of the IAEA.

What a delusional war-mongering white supremacist thought process.


If you had of read my post instead of worrying about the color of my skin (which makes you racist) you would understand that I dont agree that deals should be set up to prevent countries from doing what they want. If Iran want to make nuclear bombs then they will have to deal with the outcomes of that.

If the US is going to impose sanctions against Iran for making nuclear bombs then Iran will include that in their decision making process and decide if they want to continue to make bombs.

Just like Iran can make bombs if they want the US can trade with whoever they want.
 
Iran and Israel - a new conflict in the making?

Alex Rossi
Middle East correspondent

The long war between Iran and Israel, which has been fought in the shadows for years, is now spilling out into the open.

Israel, along with its ally the United States, it seems, now favours a direct confrontation with Tehran in Syria to prevent the further build-up of arms.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has for many years seen Iran as an existential threat and has been making the case more vocally in recent days that it is better to deal with that danger now rather than later.

Israel has carried out more than a hundred airstrikes in Syria on Iranian and Hezbollah targets since the Syrian war started, but they are rarely confirmed officially.

Israel says its forces in the occupied Golan Heights were targeted by Iranian rocket fire.

More than 20 Fajr 5 and Grad rockets were launched - four of them were intercepted by Israel's Iron Dome defence system and the rest fell short, crashing into Syrian soil.

In response, the IDF says it retaliated on a "large scale" against "significant components" of the "Iranian establishment" in Syria.

It says its fighter jets struck intelligence sites, a logistic headquarters, military compounds, observation posts and the rocket launcher.

It is still not clear whether the Israeli response is over - it may well be that we see additional strikes.

And then there is also the possibility that Iran will retaliate in some shape or form.

Donald Trump's decision to pull out of the nuclear agreement - and his reasoning behind it - will be interpreted in Tehran as the first step towards regime change.

European diplomats have accused Washington of "diplomatic vandalism". It is also an enormous gamble.

The best case scenario is that after short-term tensions, a new deal will somehow be negotiated but equally, with Iran isolated, it could be what plunges the region into a new conflict.

The next few days will be pivotal.

https://news.sky.com/story/iran-and-israel-a-new-conflict-in-the-making-11366318
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">IDF illustration showing 35 sites Israel bombed in Syria tonight including Iranian targets & Syrian regime anti-aircraft batteries. "We warned the Syrian Army to stay out of this," IDF Spokesman said. <a href="https://t.co/dxc21D5H25">https://t.co/dxc21D5H25</a> <a href="https://t.co/sZxz2VKJyz">pic.twitter.com/sZxz2VKJyz</a></p>— Elizabeth Tsurkov (@Elizrael) <a href="https://twitter.com/Elizrael/status/994421866579324928?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 10, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Tweet shows the areas struck by Israel. Don’t think the clashes are related to nuclear deal though, it probably has more to do with this event https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/world/middleeast/strikes-syria-iran-israel.html
 
Both Trump and the corrupt Israeli need a war to save themselves by diverting peoples' attention.

Not surprised about this.

There is a correlation between Fifa/Uefa tourneys and Israel's murders.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BREAKING?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BREAKING</a> Saudis will seek nuclear weapon if Iran does, minister says</p>— AFP news agency (@AFP) <a href="https://twitter.com/AFP/status/994274695565504514?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 9, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Will Trump and Yahoo allow the Saudis to acquire nukes to counter Iran?

Nope, but they won't have to. Doubt the Saudis have any idea of how to build a conventional bomb forget about a nuke and the means of delivering one.
 
This whole situation can very quickly turn into a massive cluster **** that Pakistan will be dragged into

We have avoided this mess quite well so far, but our stated mandate in Saudia Arabia has always been the defence of the holy land.

If things continue to escalate between Iran and Israel, I worry that Saudia Arabia could suffer an attack, and if that happens the pressure on Pakistan to respond will be enormous and probably too big to refuse.

I don't think its a coincidence that recently Pakistani deployed a division in KSA on top of our usual garrison there.
 
Nope, but they won't have to. Doubt the Saudis have any idea of how to build a conventional bomb forget about a nuke and the means of delivering one.

Saudis bankrolled our Nuclear Program, stuff like that doesn't happen for free.

There is enough reporting to suggest that some kind of deal is in place. I don't think it will be that we just hand over a nuke to Saudia Arabia, but I do think that it would involve the deployment of Pakistani nukes in KSA
 
Last edited:
Europe it seems will continue to be in the deal with Iran. Russians Chinese and Indians too will keep their dealings. That means most major economies wont follow US. How many will Trump sanction?
 
This whole situation can very quickly turn into a massive cluster **** that Pakistan will be dragged into

We have avoided this mess quite well so far, but our stated mandate in Saudia Arabia has always been the defence of the holy land.

If things continue to escalate between Iran and Israel, I worry that Saudia Arabia could suffer an attack, and if that happens the pressure on Pakistan to respond will be enormous and probably too big to refuse.

I don't think its a coincidence that recently Pakistani deployed a division in KSA on top of our usual garrison there.

In which case Pakistan will have not 1 or 2 but 3 volatile borders: India, Afghanistan and Iran.
 
Europe it seems will continue to be in the deal with Iran. Russians Chinese and Indians too will keep their dealings. That means most major economies wont follow US. How many will Trump sanction?

Weren't the Russians supposed to have interfered in the American elections in favour of Trump? At least that is the spiel we have been fed in the media for the past couple of years, so this action seems go counter to that in that I can't see how Russia can be happy with aggression against two major allies in the region.
 
Weren't the Russians supposed to have interfered in the American elections in favour of Trump? At least that is the spiel we have been fed in the media for the past couple of years, so this action seems go counter to that in that I can't see how Russia can be happy with aggression against two major allies in the region.

US pissing off its Allies and slowly isolating themselves is what Putin would love to achieve.
 
Weren't the Russians supposed to have interfered in the American elections in favour of Trump? At least that is the spiel we have been fed in the media for the past couple of years, so this action seems go counter to that in that I can't see how Russia can be happy with aggression against two major allies in the region.

Russia should be happy because on one side we have European powers supporting to deal, and then we have Israel and US opposing the deal. So it creates rift between allies. As for the clashes in Syria, it weakens Iran’s position in Syria. Putin shouldn’t be worried as long as his bases are safe. The article below explains the Syria thing better though it just an opinion.

Notably, Russia appears to share Israeli interests at this stage and is using Israel’s strikes to compel Assad to tow its line and distance himself from Iran. The strikes across Syria last night happened only hours after a meeting between Netanyahu and Putin, Israel informed Russia about the details of the strikes in Syria ahead of time, and Russian air defense batteries stationed in Syria did not fire at the Israeli aircrafts. Israeli officials are reporting that Russia has adopted an “apathetic” stance regarding last night’s escalation.

This is an uncomfortable position for Assad: if he reduces Iranian influence in the country, and thus becomes more dependent on Russia, Moscow would find it easier to compel him to step down. On the other hand, continuing to allow Iran to entrench itself in Syria would lead him to a confrontation with Israel, which could destabilize his rule and possibly result in his overthrow and even death. Decreasing Iran’s clout in Syria would serve Russia’s long-term interests of stabilizing the Syrian state and increasing its influence in the ongoing process of shaping Syria’s post-war future.
https://forward.com/opinion/400883/israels-airstrikes-in-syria-were-a-message/?gamp&__twitter_impression=true
 
Iran nuclear deal: EU shields firms from US sanctions law

European foreign affairs chiefs have pledged to protect firms against the impact of US sanctions for doing business with Iran.

An EU "blocking statute" will take effect on Tuesday to nullify US legal action against European firms in connection with Iran.

Some US sanctions on Iran are expected to be reimposed later on Monday.

In May, President Donald Trump withdrew the US from an international 2015 deal to control Iran's nuclear ambitions.

Under that deal, nuclear-related Western sanctions on Iran were lifted.

Mr Trump argues that the deal will not prevent Iran from finding ways to develop nuclear weapons. Iran has always insisted that its nuclear research is strictly for civilian purposes.

A joint statement from EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the UK says the nuclear deal - or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) - is "crucial" for global security.

"We are determined to protect European economic operators engaged in legitimate business with Iran, in accordance with EU law and with UN Security Council resolution 2231," the statement says.

"This is why the European Union's updated Blocking Statute enters into force on 7 August to protect EU companies doing legitimate business with Iran from the impact of US extra-territorial sanctions."

They say they "expect Iran to fully implement its nuclear commitments under the JCPOA".

Iran agreed to limit its uranium enrichment programme in return for the lifting of crippling Western sanctions.

What is the updated blocking statute?
It will enable EU-based firms to recover damages resulting from the US sanctions.

It will also ban EU businesses from complying with those US sanctions, unless they get exceptional authorisation from the European Commission.

The existing blocking statute dated from 1996 and applied to the effects of US sanctions on Cuba.

The updated version - relating to US sanctions on Iran - will be published on Tuesday, and will take effect immediately.

The EU statement commits the remaining signatories of the JCPOA to "maintenance of effective financial channels with Iran and the continuation of Iran's export of oil and gas".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-45085205
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Winning!<br><br>Tehran...”now possesses about eight times as much nuclear fuel as was permitted under the nuclear accord that Mr. Trump abandoned two years ago.” <a href="https://t.co/kliHUKwVoe">https://t.co/kliHUKwVoe</a></p>— John Sipher (@john_sipher) <a href="https://twitter.com/john_sipher/status/1269235465565200385?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 6, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Time to restore this deal. Iran were complying with the deal until the reality TV fool destroyed it because the black guy signed it and the Saudis/Netanyahu lobby hated it.

Biden does not need Congress for this.
 
Iran's Rouhani says next U.S. administration should make up for Trump's mistakes

DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran’s president said on Sunday the next U.S. administration should use the opportunity to compensate for President Donald Trump’s mistakes, Iranian state TV reported after Joe Biden captured the U.S. presidency.

Tensions have spiked between the United States and Iran since 2018, when Trump exited a nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers, and then reimposed sanctions that have crippled Iran’s economy.

“Trump’s damaging policy has been opposed ... by the American people. The next U.S. administration should use the opportunity to make up for past mistakes,” President Hassan Rouhani was quoted as saying.

“Iran favours constructive interaction with the world.”

Biden has pledged to rejoin Iran’s 2015 nuclear accord with six powers, a deal that was agreed by Washington when he was vice president, if Tehran also returns to compliance.

In retaliation for Trump’s actions, Tehran has gradually reduced its commitments to the accord. But Iran’s clerical rulers have said those steps were reversible if Tehran’s interests were respected.

“The heroic resistance of the Iranian people proved that the policy of maximum pressure is doomed to failure,” Rouhani said.

Biden has said returning to the agreement would be “a starting point for follow-on negotiations” and that Washington would then work with allies to strengthen and extend the nuclear deal and address other issues of concern.

Iran’s leaders have so far ruled out any talks aimed at further curbing Tehran’s nuclear activity, halting its ballistic missile programme and limiting the Islamic Republic’s regional influence.

“The American people have spoken. And the world is watching whether the new leaders will abandon disastrous lawless bullying of outgoing regime - and accept multilateralism, cooperation & respect for law. Deeds matter most,” Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif tweeted.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...uld-make-up-for-trumps-mistakes-idUSKBN27O0BL
 
Iran 'resumes enriching uranium to 20% purity at Fordo facility'

Iran has resumed enriching uranium to 20% purity, in its most significant breach yet of the 2015 nuclear deal.

Government spokesman Ali Rabiei told state media the process had started at the underground Fordo plant near Qom.

Enriched uranium can be used to make reactor fuel but also nuclear bombs. Weapons-grade uranium is 90% purity.

Iran, which insists that its nuclear programme is peaceful, has rolled back a number of key commitments under the deal in retaliation for US sanctions.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Iran's decision "can't be explained in any way except as continued realisation of its intention to develop a military nuclear programme".

"Israel will not allow Iran to manufacture nuclear weapons," he added.

Mr Rabiei told Iran's state news agency Irna that the process of enriching uranium to 20% had started "a couple of hours ago" at Fordo.

President Hassan Rouhani had ordered the move because he was "bound" by a new law requiring the production and storage of at least 120kg (265lbs) of 20%-enriched uranium annually for peaceful purposes, he said.

Iran's parliament passed the law following the assassination in late November of the country's top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, which Iranian leaders blamed on Israel.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said its inspectors were monitoring activities at Fordo on Monday and that its director general would file a report to member states.

But the global watchdog said last week that it had been informed by Iran of its plan to enrich to 20%.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-55530366
 
Britain says 'deeply concerned' by Iran's 20% uranium enrichment

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain said it was “deeply concerned” by Iran’s commencement of 20% uranium enrichment on Jan. 4, in a joint statement with France and Germany.

“We strongly urge Iran to stop enriching uranium to up to 20% without delay,” the countries said on Wednesday.

Iran resumed 20% uranium enrichment at an underground nuclear facility, the government said on Monday, breaching a 2015 nuclear pact with major powers.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-by-irans-20-uranium-enrichment-idUSKBN29B1PU
 
Back
Top