Stopped reading at the halfway point and skimed over the rest keep.repeating the pti twitter talking points but not addressed my point...
I say read my post again and actually respond to the specific points instead of acting like a broken record
" Isn't it true that most democracies have 4-5 year term limits and are successful"
"Btw lots of projects started under SS,NS did they refuse to take credit or do a opening ceremony cause they didn't plant the tree and it was a different gov? No infact they did huge cermonies and invited tons of pti members for the "celebration""
" if you're doing a good job people give you the time to implement if you're trash you get kicked out and not a given a seat at the table - simple democracy perform better or get kicked out cause plenty of countries have short term and long term policies you have to do both"

btw west reached this point after going through the third world problem you're only looking at now not the past when it comes to your talking points
Even in third world countries (with similar Pak problems) they are proggressing rn with democracy and 4-5 terms I don't hear them complaining about it saying make my term longer (hinting towards 8-10 year terms) for a long time and only than will I be able to perform
They win elections by performing instead of ranting
And if they're not good they get kicked out simple
But country keeps proggressing
IE look at turkey he performed for a long time resulting in election victories for over two decades
I don't hear him asking for longer terms he just wins elections