iPakistani
Tape Ball Captain
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2018
- Runs
- 1,051
It's mostly around 83-84 . It was 83 before last match .
Anyways, yes you want batsmen to provide stability in the middle but even the definition of stability has changed in modern day cricket FYI, anchoring the innings doesn't mean you have to suck all the momentum and consume deliveries just to hold an end and play with a SR of 83-84. Kohli and Root also provide stability but they don't play with SR of 80-85...Root's SR in last 3 years has been 90+ yet there were noises in Eng camp last year during WI tour that he is too slow for the modern standards and should be dropped. Kohli's SR is 92.
We provide free rides to our blue eyed boys that's why we have been in such a mess in ODIs for many years now. we need to put pressure on our favorites so that they can improve instead of getting complacent and think they are no 1 with SR of 83 with 0 match winning contribution in big match.
You really believe in ICC rankings? Faheem is in the top rankings too in bowling in t20s does that mean he becomes best pacer in the world?And also T20 ranking is even more flawed as it doesn't give consideration to the SR but to the runs scored. T20 is more about SR we all know that.. Test rankings are more valid because it give considerations to avg and babar is nowhere in those rankings.
Point is in modern day ODIs we need middle order batsmen with SR of 88-89 or more not less than that..
So which player would you suggest for that number 3? You're the same guy that wanted Shahzaib Hasan in the team am I correct in saying?