What's new

Every day is Groundhog Day with Misbah-ul-Haq as Chief Selector

Junaids

Senior T20I Player
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Runs
17,956
Post of the Week
11
I must confess to being flabbergasted by the contracts handed out on 13 May 2020.

As a practising psychiatrist I think that one of the most important personality features in any leader is an ability to learn from events and to make changes in direction. It is not a weakness, it’s a strength.

But looking at Misbah’s contracts it becomes clear that he intends to double down on his choices, with no consideration of the ravages of Father Time or the lessons learned during his first year in charge.

The saddest case is Azhar Ali. Here is a fine man who was a proudly solid batsman, who has been rendered a tailender outside Asia by Father Time. He averages 12.12 away since his 33rd birthday two years ago - and now he has been made captain for a further year.

And then there is Misbah’s catastrophic blind spot about all-rounders. He rose to power with the nonsensical claim that an all-rounder has to justify a position as a batsman or bowler alone.

Never mind that that team hasn’t had more than two functioning specialist bowlers at a time for the last five years, or more than three functioning specialist batsmen. Or that Yasir Shah has achieved more as a batsman than as a bowler in the last year.

The successful Test tour of England and Ireland two years ago was primarily due to Shadab Khan and Faheem Ashraf. Both of whom then did well in their only Test in South Africa seven months later. Only to be promptly dropped by Misbah.

I am no great fan of Mickey Arthur. But by playing two all-rounders he had ensured that in the six Tests in England, Ireland and South Africa the Pakistanis were at least bowling the opposition out every time.

But Misbah instantly returned to a four man attack....and took just 13 wickets in 2 Tests in Australia.

When your third seamer is Musa Khan or Imran Khan, I struggle to see how an all-rounder like Faheem who took 6-99 in his last Test counts as less of a bowler.

When you have elevated to the captaincy a Number 3 who has only averaged 12.12 away for the last two years, I struggle to see why you don’t ensure that you pack a couple of all-rounders to try to conceal the fact that your lame-duck has-been Captain is only going to contribute 24 runs per Test.

I’d be fine with Misbah if he learned from his mistakes. I’d respect him.

But carrying on making the same mistakes is insane. He took a young team and turned it into an elderly one. And now he keeps it together with everyone a year older.
 
Misbah's one dimensional captaincy is nothing new. Why should his coaching be any different
 
He's responsible for inducting Naseem and just recently Haider. He replaced 32 year old Sarfaraz with 27 year old Rizwan. He's made Babar Azam, a 25 year old, captain in 2 out of 3 formats. He promoted Shadab, a 21 year old, as captain of IU, only to see Shadab transform himself as a player.

You can't pick and choose facts to say Misbah has some fetish for old guys.
 
I do agree though about Faheem or at least some pace bowling AR needed for England.
 
He's responsible for inducting Naseem and just recently Haider. He replaced 32 year old Sarfaraz with 27 year old Rizwan. He's made Babar Azam, a 25 year old, captain in 2 out of 3 formats. He promoted Shadab, a 21 year old, as captain of IU, only to see Shadab transform himself as a player.

You can't pick and choose facts to say Misbah has some fetish for old guys.
This thread wasn’t really about his preference for age so much as his inability to learn from experience.

And no one on earth could have failed to pick Naseem after his start to the season. Nobody!
 
Biased and agenda driven thread from a usual Misbah hater.

There's 3 all rounders he picked - Imad, Shadab and Iftikhar, but OP has a preference for fast bowling all rounders so he/she's criticizing based on that. Tell me doctor, where's Misbah to find those when there isn't any quality fast bowling all rounder in the first place. And you can't blame him for trying...
One advantage that PCT got with Misbah coaching ISB is he was able to get a good look at both Faheem and Amad, the two contenders for the slot. For a majority of ISB's games, he picked both in playing XI at the expense of the franchise interest, just in hopes that maybe one of them will show form and make Misbah's job easier to select for national team. Guess what though, both are not good enough. So how do you want him to select someone that doesn't exist
 
Last edited:
This thread wasn’t really about his preference for age so much as his inability to learn from experience.

And no one on earth could have failed to pick Naseem after his start to the season. Nobody!

No one on earth could've failed to pick fawad and Sadaf in their primes. They weren't though as this is Pakistan cricket and possible can become impossible or vice versa. Give the man credit for what he gets right
 
No one on earth could've failed to pick fawad and Sadaf in their primes. They weren't though as this is Pakistan cricket and possible can become impossible or vice versa. Give the man credit for what he gets right

This!!!! Exactly.

This thread wasn’t really about his preference for age so much as his inability to learn from experience.

Your thread was about two specific points. First, that Misbah does not pick fast bowling ARs (Faheem Ashraf). Second, that he is making the team older by refusing to phase out the older guys (cherrypicking the example of Azhar while ignoring him phasing out a host of other players and phasing in kids).

I’ve responded to the second one.

Regarding the first — Faheem Ashraf is a half decent bits and pieces player. On paper, a fast bowling AR is needed, but... come on haha, Faheem Ashraf? You seriously want to give the guy a central contract?

Misbah is keeping him in the loop in general if you see the online coaching sessions with Pakistan greats. It’s very possible he will be part of the test plans. But your current thread is a knee jerk reaction to a central contracts list where someone like him has no place being.
 
Back
Top