Mamoon
ATG
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Runs
- 108,086
- Post of the Week
- 12
I usually don't like to create threads, but I have been forced to do so because I would like to touch on a few things and I can't find an appropriate thread.
It appears that every time Pakistan is going to win, people are going to line up like sheep and call it a fluke in order to score some cheap points and to have a go at me.
The clever ones, in order to provide some comic relief, are going to come up with gifs to make people laugh, showcasing their originality because it is something that has not been done before.
Every Pakistan win is not fluke. I have been on this forum for 6 years and I have over 70k posts. Please find a list of my posts where I have labeled Pakistan wins as fluke.
"Fluke" has been buzzword on PakPassion over the last year because I used it to describe Pakistan's Champions Trophy triumph, and I do not regret it. I am still adamant that it was a fluke, because I do not recall the last time things fell in place for a team to win the way it did for Pakistan over the course of those 4 games. Every single thing that could have gone right for Pakistan did.
That word seemed to have blasted a few nerves, and I do not know why or how, but it seemed to have caught up with Shoaib Akhtar and Younis Khan as well.
The matches that Pakistan have won over the course of its history have not been flukes, and this win at Lord's was not a fluke either. Pakistan simply played better cricket than England whoever extremely poor in all departments.
Now the snowflakes have a problem with calling the English performance as poor, because apparently it is an attempt to take credit away from Pakistan. No it is not.
England have some world class players, and obviously if they play to their potential, Pakistan would not romp to a 9 wicket win in 4 days, but that is how most cricket matches won - one team is better than the other on the day, so it is not an attempt to discredit the fact that Pakistan thoroughly outplayed England over the 4 days.
Moreover, people simply want everyone to stand in line and claim that everything is nice and dandy and every win is supposedly the start of a new golden era.
In my time on PakPassion, I have seen at least ten different instances that were supposedly the start of a new golden era, only for it to go up in ashes. The same people were tripping over each other to explain why the Champions Trophy winning golden Pakistan team got battered in New Zealand, and the same folks would have come up with the "it is a fluke" posts and stupid gifs to mock me had we won the New Zealand series.
I am sure they had their posts and gifs ready and were itching to post them, but unfortunately, the champions did not give them the opportunity.
Pakistani fans are the only group of fans where every important win has to be the start of a new golden era, because apparently, you cannot win matches in isolation.
The irony is that isolated victories is all that Pakistan has achieved in its history - we have never had prolonged periods of dominance because we have never been able to build up on our wins, and everything blows up soon after things look great.
We were supposed to be the best ODI team in the world after the Champions Trophy, and apparently only England in England and Australia in Australia could compete with us, and I can quote posts of the people who have spent the last four days having a go at me, but I would let it go because I don't think they deserve that humiliation at this time.
This inconsistency of Pakistan cricket has been repackaged and rebranded as "unpredictability" and "mercuriality", as if it is something to be proud of. No, it is nothing to be proud of. Only in Pakistan is inconsistency considered positive.
I do not mind people calling me a troll and an attention-seeker; people can say what they want, they are free to do so, but trolls do not explain their viewpoints and I am always prepared to argue my points. Whether people agree or not is not my problem, since it is not in my control.
The only thing that I can control is to explain my views. I don't have a problem with people insulting me or taking shots at me; the only problem I have when people misquote me, put words in my mouth, and take my comments out of context.
Moreover, I also have an issue with people thinking that I win when Pakistan loses, and vice versa.
Just because I think that Pakistan is a mediocre team does not mean that I don't want Pakistan to win. I have followed the game decades before I joined PakPassion, and I will follow the game decades after I leave, and I have spent more time in Pakistan than some of the expats who label me an Indian, just because I don't wear green-tinted glasses and think that India is a far better team.
We don't love the game because we post on this forum; we post on this forum because we love the game. None of us will post here forever, and we will all move on with our lives.
If Pakistan assemble a team that I think can become the best in the world, I will be the first one to admit. However, it has not happened yet, but I would love for it to happen. My so-called "character" of being a pessimist means absolutely nothing to me.
I am sorry for this rant, but I had to get it off my chest. I am not upset, but I am tired for getting criticized for presenting my opinions, because it prevents me from criticizing, appreciating and supporting in proper spirit.
Furthermore, it doesn't allow me celebrate because apparently I am gutted that Pakistan have won, just because I back Pakistan to lose more often than not.
The only thing I have seen over the last few days is people queuing up to call this win a fluke because apparently that is what I think. I have tried to play along a couple of times because that is what people want to hear from me apparently, for e.g. the Pakistan wins in Ramzaan thread etc., but every Pakistan win is not a fluke, and I have the right to celebrate wins as much as anyone else.
I am not sure if this thread is appropriate or not but I have been left with little choice because of the actions of a group of people.
Considering the obsession of some people, it appears that my views give them nightmares, yet I am the one blamed for "seeking attention".
It appears that every time Pakistan is going to win, people are going to line up like sheep and call it a fluke in order to score some cheap points and to have a go at me.
The clever ones, in order to provide some comic relief, are going to come up with gifs to make people laugh, showcasing their originality because it is something that has not been done before.
Every Pakistan win is not fluke. I have been on this forum for 6 years and I have over 70k posts. Please find a list of my posts where I have labeled Pakistan wins as fluke.
"Fluke" has been buzzword on PakPassion over the last year because I used it to describe Pakistan's Champions Trophy triumph, and I do not regret it. I am still adamant that it was a fluke, because I do not recall the last time things fell in place for a team to win the way it did for Pakistan over the course of those 4 games. Every single thing that could have gone right for Pakistan did.
That word seemed to have blasted a few nerves, and I do not know why or how, but it seemed to have caught up with Shoaib Akhtar and Younis Khan as well.
The matches that Pakistan have won over the course of its history have not been flukes, and this win at Lord's was not a fluke either. Pakistan simply played better cricket than England whoever extremely poor in all departments.
Now the snowflakes have a problem with calling the English performance as poor, because apparently it is an attempt to take credit away from Pakistan. No it is not.
England have some world class players, and obviously if they play to their potential, Pakistan would not romp to a 9 wicket win in 4 days, but that is how most cricket matches won - one team is better than the other on the day, so it is not an attempt to discredit the fact that Pakistan thoroughly outplayed England over the 4 days.
Moreover, people simply want everyone to stand in line and claim that everything is nice and dandy and every win is supposedly the start of a new golden era.
In my time on PakPassion, I have seen at least ten different instances that were supposedly the start of a new golden era, only for it to go up in ashes. The same people were tripping over each other to explain why the Champions Trophy winning golden Pakistan team got battered in New Zealand, and the same folks would have come up with the "it is a fluke" posts and stupid gifs to mock me had we won the New Zealand series.
I am sure they had their posts and gifs ready and were itching to post them, but unfortunately, the champions did not give them the opportunity.
Pakistani fans are the only group of fans where every important win has to be the start of a new golden era, because apparently, you cannot win matches in isolation.
The irony is that isolated victories is all that Pakistan has achieved in its history - we have never had prolonged periods of dominance because we have never been able to build up on our wins, and everything blows up soon after things look great.
We were supposed to be the best ODI team in the world after the Champions Trophy, and apparently only England in England and Australia in Australia could compete with us, and I can quote posts of the people who have spent the last four days having a go at me, but I would let it go because I don't think they deserve that humiliation at this time.
This inconsistency of Pakistan cricket has been repackaged and rebranded as "unpredictability" and "mercuriality", as if it is something to be proud of. No, it is nothing to be proud of. Only in Pakistan is inconsistency considered positive.
I do not mind people calling me a troll and an attention-seeker; people can say what they want, they are free to do so, but trolls do not explain their viewpoints and I am always prepared to argue my points. Whether people agree or not is not my problem, since it is not in my control.
The only thing that I can control is to explain my views. I don't have a problem with people insulting me or taking shots at me; the only problem I have when people misquote me, put words in my mouth, and take my comments out of context.
Moreover, I also have an issue with people thinking that I win when Pakistan loses, and vice versa.
Just because I think that Pakistan is a mediocre team does not mean that I don't want Pakistan to win. I have followed the game decades before I joined PakPassion, and I will follow the game decades after I leave, and I have spent more time in Pakistan than some of the expats who label me an Indian, just because I don't wear green-tinted glasses and think that India is a far better team.
We don't love the game because we post on this forum; we post on this forum because we love the game. None of us will post here forever, and we will all move on with our lives.
If Pakistan assemble a team that I think can become the best in the world, I will be the first one to admit. However, it has not happened yet, but I would love for it to happen. My so-called "character" of being a pessimist means absolutely nothing to me.
I am sorry for this rant, but I had to get it off my chest. I am not upset, but I am tired for getting criticized for presenting my opinions, because it prevents me from criticizing, appreciating and supporting in proper spirit.
Furthermore, it doesn't allow me celebrate because apparently I am gutted that Pakistan have won, just because I back Pakistan to lose more often than not.
The only thing I have seen over the last few days is people queuing up to call this win a fluke because apparently that is what I think. I have tried to play along a couple of times because that is what people want to hear from me apparently, for e.g. the Pakistan wins in Ramzaan thread etc., but every Pakistan win is not a fluke, and I have the right to celebrate wins as much as anyone else.
I am not sure if this thread is appropriate or not but I have been left with little choice because of the actions of a group of people.
Considering the obsession of some people, it appears that my views give them nightmares, yet I am the one blamed for "seeking attention".
Last edited by a moderator:

)
h: