What's new

[EXCLUSIVE] "We're not a settled team": Mudassar Nazar

Ball Blazer

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 13, 2025
Runs
5,437
In this exclusive interview, former Pakistan opener and legendary all-rounder Mudassar Nazar shares his strong opinions on the political manoeuvring behind the India-Pakistan clash, the instability plaguing the Pakistan team, and the ICC's unfair revenue distribution. The 76-Test veteran reflects on the pressure of facing India, the "silly selections" hurting the current side, and the silence of the cricketing world regarding Imran Khan's health — and much more.

Key revelations include:

•⁠ ⁠⁠⁠ICC revenue critique: "Pakistan must get a major share" - Mudassar expresses relief that the match is proceeding despite months of uncertainty. He criticizes the BCCI’s influence over the ECB and Cricket Australia, arguing that Pakistan deserves a larger share of the revenue generated by these matchups. He suggests the ICC should implement a $50 million fine for any country or government that pulls out of a tournament.

•⁠ ⁠⁠⁠Pressure of India clash: "That game we lost... I have not watched the highlights" - He notes that players on both sides try to "blank out" the noise, but the pressure from fans—especially those living and working together in the UAE—makes losing unthinkable. Mudassar admits he still cannot bring himself to watch highlights of the low-scoring loss to India in Sharjah years ago.

•⁠ ⁠⁠⁠Team instability: "We're not a settled team" - A major point of contention is Pakistan's unsettled lineup. He characterizes the middle order as unpredictable because players are not being utilized in their natural positions.

•⁠ ⁠⁠⁠Babar Azam debate: "He's not made to play like that" - Mudassar argues that playing Babar Azam at #4 is a mistake; he believes Babar must either open or bat at #3 to be effective.

⁠ ⁠⁠⁠Selection blunder: "We have a quality mystery spinner... not in the team" - While Pakistan’s strength lies in its spinners, Mudassar warns that the Indian lineup is packed with aggressive left-handers who excel against spin. He laments the exclusion of "mystery spinners" like Sufyan, noting that teams like India and Afghanistan have successfully integrated such bowlers while Pakistan has failed to develop them.

⁠ ⁠⁠Silence about ⁠Imran Khan: "There have been instances where people have suffered" - The interview concludes with a somber discussion on former captain Imran Khan's imprisonment and reported health issues. Mudassar expresses disappointment over the lack of public support from former teammates, attributing their silence to the current climate of fear and political instability in Pakistan.

Watch full interview with Saj here:

 
About Imran Khan, I think the cricketers should speak up regardless of the political spectrum they are on as it is something related to a persons health who is a former cricketer.
 
No middle order , players not playing in their natural position
Shadab khan used as a pinch hitter because he’s one of the only players in form currently

The fact is pakistans decision to not play the whole of dec and Jan to play in t20 leagues massively had a negative impact on both players forms and their confidence
 
He’s wrong about developing players. Most of them like sufyan are with shaheens or various other tournaments where they need to build up their experience and control.

He’s right about babar and middle order. Don’t see why babar can’t open. He might play slow but he can build a platform (but not at 4)

He’s right about middle order it is a little shaky
 
“He might be slow” is the whole point. It’s 20/20. Look at the power hitting skills of other successful teams and you will have your answer. He can’t cut it. 20/20 is about instant results NOT ACCUMULATION. It’s not test cricket!
 
“He might be slow” is the whole point. It’s 20/20. Look at the power hitting skills of other successful teams and you will have your answer. He can’t cut it. 20/20 is about instant results NOT ACCUMULATION. It’s not test cricket!
Are you answering me? “ he might play slow” is what I wrote. Not he might be slow. In that if you’re an opener your job is to lay a platform and then catch up. Not be slow for sake of it but play slow then accelerate There is a difference.

So if laying platform is the goal then he has a place. This can’t be done at 4. This is the point hesson is making. But now it’s a point of tension is a proper batsman needed at the top or players who waft at thin air who might connect or might not. Bumrah rabada etc 9 times out of ten will nail our hackers. A proper batsman playing slow has a chance.
 
Are you answering me? “ he might play slow” is what I wrote. Not he might be slow. In that if you’re an opener your job is to lay a platform and then catch up. Not be slow for sake of it but play slow then accelerate There is a difference.

So if laying platform is the goal then he has a place. This can’t be done at 4. This is the point hesson is making. But now it’s a point of tension is a proper batsman needed at the top or players who waft at thin air who might connect or might not. Bumrah rabada etc 9 times out of ten will nail our hackers. A proper batsman playing slow has a chance.
He is too slow, however you phrase it and there’s no room for accumulation in T20. As Gabbar Singh says in “Sholay” “Jo Dar gaya, samjho mar gaya”. Babar is slow - no brain as a captain. He also plays too slow AND is known to struggle against spin which he hasn’t addressed. No room for him in the team, however senior he is. Winning teams can’t afford to carry passengers.
 
Are you answering me? “ he might play slow” is what I wrote. Not he might be slow. In that if you’re an opener your job is to lay a platform and then catch up. Not be slow for sake of it but play slow then accelerate There is a difference.

So if laying platform is the goal then he has a place. This can’t be done at 4. This is the point hesson is making. But now it’s a point of tension is a proper batsman needed at the top or players who waft at thin air who might connect or might not. Bumrah rabada etc 9 times out of ten will nail our hackers. A proper batsman playing slow has a chance.
T20 openers job is to get as many runs on the board as possible seeking to utilise the power play.
 
Pakistan tried the same approach as SA after losing early wickets but didn’t work well but Saffers know how to go about it.. Brevis has so much power
 
Back
Top