What's new

For two seasons, Ranji players have not been paid match fees by BCCI

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
As the curtains come down on the 2017-18 Ranji season, cricketers across the country, for the second successive season, still await their BCCI-disbursed domestic cricket match fees. While most players have received part payment from state units, none of them have received the lion’s share of their annual earning drawn from 10.6 per cent of the BCCI’s total gross revenue. This pro-rata payment depends on BCCI’s variable annual income but on an average a Ranji Trophy regular, who also plays shorter-version domestic competitions, earns Rs 12-15 lakh a year as match fees.

The delayed payment stems from the impasse between the Vinod Rai-led Committee of Administrators (CoA) and state units over implementing the Supreme Court-ordered Justice RM Lodha reforms. Another reason for the delay is the new payment plan that the CoA is working on. “There has been no general body meeting since the time CoA took charge. So the accounts have not been cleared and thus there is no clarity about what the players should be getting,” said an official.

The BCCI’s income distribution formula ensures that 26 per cent of the revenue goes to players. This is further broken into 13 per cent for international stars, 10.6 per cent for domestic players and the rest is allocated to women and junior cricketers. The Indian Express spoke to 25 teams across India and none of them had received the BCCI payment.

The state units are in dark about the issue. “The players have not received money from the Board. I have been told players will receive their full payment once the AGM (annual general meeting) takes place. But we don’t know when the AGM will happen. As far as MCA is concerned we have paid our players what we owe them but we are yet to receive the Board’s money,” Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) joint secretary Unmesh Khanvilkar said.

The issue has left players — there are at least 500 first-class cricketers — restless. Mumbai captain Aditya Tare confirmed he had not received domestic match fees that he gets from the BCCI, for two years now. “As professional cricketers, we should get what we deserve at the right time. Domestic cricketers are often forgotten when it comes to payments. Very few players bag IPL contracts, which is normally sufficient for that particular season. But many who work equally hard are just playing in the domestic circuit without knowing when and what amount they will make that year,” he said.

In some state units, like Jammu and Kashmir, things are worse. Former India player and J&K’s senior-most cricketer Parvez Rasool said his team has not received money from the home association and BCCI, for the last three years.

“We stay in five-star hotels across India for our domestic games. But the players have to spend their own money for food. We haven’t even got daily allowance over the last three years. Forget the BCCI revenue money,” Rasool said. He felt it was high time the Board increased the money for state players.

Niranjan Shah, chairman of the National Cricket Academy, said, “The COA must use their powers and pay domestic cricketers,” he said.

http://indianexpress.com/article/sp...ave-not-been-paid-match-fees-by-bcci-5087390/
 
As I keep saying, the BCCI’s own published Annual Financial Reports make simple reading.

The BCCI has huge revenue but it is massively overspending, and without enormous ICC welfare handouts the BCCI would be insolvent.

The BCCI is not the financial superpower of world cricket. It is an economic Banana Republic, which can’t balance the budget without massive amounts of overseas aid because it squanders most of its money in paying off its voting State Associations.
 
Surprising that there isn't a player union in the largest democracy of the world. What good are reforms when you don't pay your players on time?
 
As I keep saying, the BCCI’s own published Annual Financial Reports make simple reading.

The BCCI has huge revenue but it is massively overspending, and without enormous ICC welfare handouts the BCCI would be insolvent.

The BCCI is not the financial superpower of world cricket. It is an economic Banana Republic, which can’t balance the budget without massive amounts of overseas aid because it squanders most of its money in paying off its voting State Associations.

Overspending on what? Also, it's not a handout when u contribute a lion's share to the overall revenue of ICC
 
Overspending on what? Also, it's not a handout when u contribute a lion's share to the overall revenue of ICC
The BCCI contributes nothing to the ICC, let alone the lions share.

Private Indian TV stations do, just as Mexican and South Korean TV contribute more to FIFA than Dutch TV or Uruguayan TV. But that doesn’t mean that FIFA give Mexico or South Korea’s federations more money than the Netherlands or Uruguay.

The BCCI financial reports show that the State Cricket Associations receive multi-million dollar annual payoffs separate from player wages or ground and other infrastructure. There is no clear cricket development justification for this, nor is the use of these payoffs audited or scrutinised. I will word the next sentence carefully. For all we know, these could be payoffs for votes: there is simply no way of telling what this money is for.

Anyway, the BCCI ends up reliant on overseas aid due to the huge amounts of money allocated to these opaque and mysterious payoffs.
 
The BCCI contributes nothing to the ICC, let alone the lions share.

Private Indian TV stations do, just as Mexican and South Korean TV contribute more to FIFA than Dutch TV or Uruguayan TV. But that doesn’t mean that FIFA give Mexico or South Korea’s federations more money than the Netherlands or Uruguay.

The BCCI financial reports show that the State Cricket Associations receive multi-million dollar annual payoffs separate from player wages or ground and other infrastructure. There is no clear cricket development justification for this, nor is the use of these payoffs audited or scrutinised. I will word the next sentence carefully. For all we know, these could be payoffs for votes: there is simply no way of telling what this money is for.

Anyway, the BCCI ends up reliant on overseas aid due to the huge amounts of money allocated to these opaque and mysterious payoffs.

Man you have huge bucket of sour grapes.. Are you sure BCCI/Indians didn't do anything to your first born :) don't burn out so fast with rage, Indian cricket and BCCI will make lots of progress in the future and you need to live through that :)
 
Man you have huge bucket of sour grapes.. Are you sure BCCI/Indians didn't do anything to your first born :) don't burn out so fast with rage, Indian cricket and BCCI will make lots of progress in the future and you need to live through that :)

It’s just a fact.

Japanese TV pays FIFA twenty times as much money for TV rights as Argentinian TV.

But nobody claims that Japan is a football superpower but Argentina isn’t.

And FIFA aren’t daft enough to give Japan special treatment or huge welfare payments like the ICC gives the BCCI.

Indians repeatedly confuse the contribution to cricket of their private TV stations buying rights (huge) with the contribution of the BCCI (utterly worthless).

It’s quite funny in its absurdity really.
 
Last edited:
It’s just a fact.

Japanese TV pays FIFA twenty times as much money for TV rights as Argentinian TV.

But nobody claims that Japan is a football superpower but Argentina isn’t.

And FIFA aren’t daft enough to give Japan special treatment or huge welfare payments like the ICC gives the BCCI.

Indians repeatedly confuse the contribution to cricket of their private TV stations buying rights (huge) with the contribution of the BCCI (utterly worthless).

It’s quite funny in its absurdity really.

<s>I am sure without BCCI (or similar board capable of monetizing cricket) all TVs stations will line up to pay huge sum of money </s>

TV stations, like all business, will pay the least that they can get way with for the product they are buying. It is up to the seller (BCCI in this case) to make the most of what they are selling, which BCCI is doing rather well. Although the amount look very big it is still very less and potential is very high for Indian market. Hopefully BCCI will exploit it in the coming decades... Don't worry same thing will happen in Pak/BD once they get their act together.. there is no secret in that
 
The problem is due to the confrontation that BCCI is having with SC. They have got into this CoA mess and no-one, including SC, knows how to get out of it. My personal opinion is that this is an unnecessary judiciary overreach and SC has over extended themselves. But according to Juanid BCCI is not only corrupt but bankrupt as well and survives on ICC dole outs.

BCCI is certainly not the shining example of great management body, but they are not incompetent either. When compared to other boards they are really great.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"but but but Indian players get paid so well that they don't ever need a different career"
 
"but but but Indian players get paid so well that they don't ever need a different career"

Reality is that they do. When the BCCI finally does send those Ranji players those checks, they will be pretty big checks. BCCI allocates 26% of its income to player compensation - half of it goes to the national team, 10% to Ranji players. 10% of BCCI income is massive.

Like others have pointed out, there's a big power politics play going on with the BCCI, and the players are being used as pawns for now.


But please do feel free to gloat and enjoy the mismanagement snafus of the BCCI. Their actions deserve it.


And as always, thanks to Salty Junaid for the LOL. Oh how he wishes ICC was FIFA.


But it AIN'T, is it? :)

Unfortunately for him, the reality of Cricket isn't changing any time soon. Maybe he should start threads like does BCCI's bank balance of billions of dollars really count? :ashwin
 
Bcci can't manage to hold a day night test on it's own, so the pay delay shouldn't come as a surprise. COA is a joke. They are going to undo all the hard work bcci has done over the years.
 
embarassing!

must feel bad for these players

your employer claims to have lot of money but doesnt pay you
 
Reality is that they do. When the BCCI finally does send those Ranji players those checks, they will be pretty big checks. BCCI allocates 26% of its income to player compensation - half of it goes to the national team, 10% to Ranji players. 10% of BCCI income is massive.

Like others have pointed out, there's a big power politics play going on with the BCCI, and the players are being used as pawns for now.


But please do feel free to gloat and enjoy the mismanagement snafus of the BCCI. Their actions deserve it.


And as always, thanks to Salty Junaid for the LOL. Oh how he wishes ICC was FIFA.


But it AIN'T, is it? :)

Unfortunately for him, the reality of Cricket isn't changing any time soon. Maybe he should start threads like does BCCI's bank balance of billions of dollars really count? :ashwin

Relax there. No one asked for the breakdown. I already know BCCI got the $$$.....your post really doesn't tell me something that's not obvious knowledge.. And sounds like you're salty here about what Junaids said. You should just take it up with him.

I was just quoting what most Indian fans love sharing at any discussion related to player fees/pays.
 
"but but but Indian players get paid so well that they don't ever need a different career"

What can bcci do if the court appointed administrators are blocking everything. From payments to hosting day night tests. The CoA has been a curse to Indian cricket.
 
embarassing!

must feel bad for these players

your employer claims to have lot of money but doesnt pay you

Not BCCIs fault.

From the OP.

" The delayed payment stems from the impasse between the Vinod Rai-led Committee of Administrators (CoA) and state units over implementing the Supreme Court-ordered Justice RM Lodha reforms. Another reason for the delay is the new payment plan that the CoA is working on. “There has been no general body meeting since the time CoA took charge. So the accounts have not been cleared and thus there is no clarity about what the players should be getting,” said an official. "
 
ICC's estimated revenue from 2015 to 2023 $2.5bn.

IPL broadcast rights from 2018 to 2022 $2.55bn.

ICC saving its money for Australia tour?Or may be money in IPL doesnot count?
 
Not BCCIs fault.

From the OP.

" The delayed payment stems from the impasse between the Vinod Rai-led Committee of Administrators (CoA) and state units over implementing the Supreme Court-ordered Justice RM Lodha reforms. Another reason for the delay is the new payment plan that the CoA is working on. “There has been no general body meeting since the time CoA took charge. So the accounts have not been cleared and thus there is no clarity about what the players should be getting,” said an official. "

tbh the person not getting paid will just care about not getting paid from BCCI

He doesnt care about whose fault it is. His concern is who owes him
 
tbh the person not getting paid will just care about not getting paid from BCCI

He doesnt care about whose fault it is. His concern is who owes him

Everyone involved in Indian cricket knows how the CoA is blocking things. But its a temporary thing so people are being patient.
 
As I keep saying, the BCCI’s own published Annual Financial Reports make simple reading.

The BCCI has huge revenue but it is massively overspending, and without enormous ICC welfare handouts the BCCI would be insolvent.

The BCCI is not the financial superpower of world cricket. It is an economic Banana Republic, which can’t balance the budget without massive amounts of overseas aid because it squanders most of its money in paying off its voting State Associations.

Not again bhai.. even after BCCI selling rights for more than ICC world events your coming with this, expected little common sense from you !
 
without enormous ICC welfare handouts the BCCI would be insolvent.

The BCCI is not the financial superpower of world cricket. It is an economic Banana Republic, which can’t balance the budget without massive amounts of overseas aid because it squanders most of its money in paying off its voting State Associations.

Not again bhai.. even after BCCI selling rights for more than ICC world events your coming with this, expected little common sense from you !

Earth to Junaids "get a clue".

http://www.timesnownews.com/sports/...ure-ms-dhoni-misses-out-on-top-bracket/205507
 
Not again bhai.. even after BCCI selling rights for more than ICC world events your coming with this, expected little common sense from you !
So what?

Nobody disputes that the BCCI has huge revenue. The problem is that it’s spending is even bigger, and without ICC welfare handouts it can’t pay its bills.
 
So what?

Nobody disputes that the BCCI has huge revenue. The problem is that it’s spending is even bigger, and without ICC welfare handouts it can’t pay its bills.

How exactly do you know that? Who told you?
 
So what?

Nobody disputes that the BCCI has huge revenue. The problem is that it’s spending is even bigger, and without ICC welfare handouts it can’t pay its bills.

How exactly do you know that? Who told you?

Direct connection with BCCI accounts department, may be he works for BCCI secretly who knows .. lol :ishant

BCCI can't pay its bills without ICC handouts, yet it just increased Rohit, BK and Bumrah's contracts by 600% and Dhawan's by 1,300%.

I claim Britain would be bankrupt without handouts from Tata Motors in the form of taxes paid by its JLR subsidiary. Facts be damned, disprove my claim if you can.
 
BCCI can't pay its bills without ICC handouts, yet it just increased Rohit, BK and Bumrah's contracts by 600% and Dhawan's by 1,300%.

and all Domestic Players by 200%
 
BCCI can't pay its bills without ICC handouts, yet it just increased Rohit, BK and Bumrah's contracts by 600% and Dhawan's by 1,300%.

I claim Britain would be bankrupt without handouts from Tata Motors in the form of taxes paid by its JLR subsidiary. Facts be damned, disprove my claim if you can.

Cant pay bills yet have huge surplus. The guy is a gone case.
 
Cant pay bills yet have huge surplus. The guy is a gone case.

Australia exports to India totaled AU$13B in 2015-16, while imports were only AU$5B. The extra $8B "handout" that Australia received from India is keeping it solvent. Yes, the Australian economy produces a lot of stuff, but without the Indian handout it would be bankrupt, and [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION] would be out of a job. So basically we Indians are bailing him out with our handouts, otherwise he would be unemployed.

I have studied statistics for the Australian national economy in coming to this conclusion.

[MENTION=134300]Tusker[/MENTION] [MENTION=3327]Indiafan[/MENTION]2018 [MENTION=133315]Hitman[/MENTION]
 
Last edited:
So what?

Nobody disputes that the BCCI has huge revenue. The problem is that it’s spending is even bigger, and without ICC welfare handouts it can’t pay its bills.

How exactly do you know that? Who told you?

Direct connection with BCCI accounts department, may be he works for BCCI secretly who knows .. lol :ishant

BCCI can't pay its bills without ICC handouts, yet it just increased Rohit, BK and Bumrah's contracts by 600% and Dhawan's by 1,300%.

I claim Britain would be bankrupt without handouts from Tata Motors in the form of taxes paid by its JLR subsidiary. Facts be damned, disprove my claim if you can.
1. It’s all in the BCCI’s own published financial reports.

Take away the ICC welfare handouts - or indeed restore them to the pre-Big Three model of being the same for every country - and the BCCI would literally be bankrupt.

http://www.bcci.tv/about/2018/bcci-annual-reports

2. Overspending is the whole basis of the BCCI’s economic basketcase status.

It pays inflated wages - a bad thing, not a good one - but more importantly makes unexplained vast payments to state associations.

The BCCI is the equivalent of an ageing and about-to-retire sportsman, used to earning $10 million per year and spending every cent. It doesn’t know how to control its spending and would be insolvent if it stopped receiving the external revenue it gets.

But the ICC welfare handouts aren’t the BCCI’s money. Srinivasan knew that BCCI couldn’t meet its expenses and he effectively held the ICC hostage to try to divert a large part of the ICC’s surplus to the BCCI.

But if and when the post-Big Three ICC says “Time’s Up” to the BCCI, the BCCI won’t be able to meet its expenses.

It’s all in their own published Annual Financial Reports.
 
So the COA system works fine for international players who get bulk of the income and yet for the little guys in domestic it doesn't?.... confused!
 
So the COA system works fine for international players who get bulk of the income and yet for the little guys in domestic it doesn't?.... confused!

The "little guys" in the domestics just got a 200% pay raise. They will get paid some time in the future when the legal issues are sorted out.
 
1. It’s all in the BCCI’s own published financial reports.

Take away the ICC welfare handouts - or indeed restore them to the pre-Big Three model of being the same for every country - and the BCCI would literally be bankrupt.

http://www.bcci.tv/about/2018/bcci-annual-reports

I guess the concept is hard for you to understand, but people spend according to what they earn. Obviously, if BCCI wasn't getting fees/revenues from ICC, its spending would be different.

2. Overspending is the whole basis of the BCCI’s economic basketcase status.

Whatever Indians do, they don't over pay. Indians are "cost conscious".

Take a look at the budget of the Australian government:

http://www.budget.gov.au/2017-18/content/bp1/html/

If you take away the AU$8B that India is donating as a "handout" to the Aussies, the Australian government would be bankrupt and Junaids would be out of a job.

Of course you may claim that the AU$8B is not a "handout" and is actually payment for stuff Indians buy from the Aussies. However the same argument would then have to be applied to your claiming that ICC provides "handouts" to BCCI.
 
BCCI taught lesson by PCB.

Due to decreased income share from ICC and fighting legal battle with pcb, bcci is now broke!

Pakistan cricket should help BCCI. Now it has PSL it can spare some loan to BCCI so it can pay their domestic players.
 
I guess the concept is hard for you to understand, but people spend according to what they earn. Obviously, if BCCI wasn't getting fees/revenues from ICC, its spending would be different.



Whatever Indians do, they don't over pay. Indians are "cost conscious".

Take a look at the budget of the Australian government:

http://www.budget.gov.au/2017-18/content/bp1/html/

If you take away the AU$8B that India is donating as a "handout" to the Aussies, the Australian government would be bankrupt and Junaids would be out of a job.

Of course you may claim that the AU$8B is not a "handout" and is actually payment for stuff Indians buy from the Aussies. However the same argument would then have to be applied to your claiming that ICC provides "handouts" to BCCI.

Excellent post, that guy won't stop saying BCCI is bankrupt, similar to ex PCB chief 'Honour the MoU' ! :sharif
 
The "little guys" in the domestics just got a 200% pay raise. They will get paid some time in the future when the legal issues are sorted out.

They got a note of IOU of 200% you mean .. in the meantime you carry on paying out of your own pocket.

How come "legal issues" don't hamper payment to international players? It totals more than the payment to domestic players.
 
They got a note of IOU of 200% you mean .. in the meantime you carry on paying out of your own pocket.

How come "legal issues" don't hamper payment to international players? It totals more than the payment to domestic players.

There you have me. I have no idea why that is the case.
 
Looks like lot of PPers are more worried about our domestic cricketers salary...Thanks for the concern.

Internal issue, BCCI / CoA will work out solution within legal limits.

As desis, we should know if some financial clearance is dependent on court, usually delay in settlement is inevitable.

May be Pak courts are real quick, I guess :ashwin
 
Last edited:
Looks like lot of PPers are more worried about our domestic cricketers salary...Thanks for the concern.

Internal issue, BCCI / CoA will work out solution within legal limits.

As desis, we should know if some financial clearance is dependent on court, usually delay in settlement is inevitable.

May be Pak courts are real quick, I guess :ashwin

You went quickly into Bharat defence mode.

Do you know why the "legal issues" only affect domestic players?
 
You went quickly into Bharat defence mode.

Do you know why the "legal issues" only affect domestic players?

Non of others business... Few here can't even take valid criticism on ESL, preaching about how BCCI pays to domestic players.

Thanks for the concern anyway :ishant
 
You went quickly into Bharat defence mode.

Do you know why the "legal issues" only affect domestic players?

I just stated how legal system works in India, seeing so much love on our domestic players felt Pak legal system is pretty fast hence the expectations I thought !
 
What can bcci do if the court appointed administrators are blocking everything. From payments to hosting day night tests. The CoA has been a curse to Indian cricket.


Too much politicking in BCCI since a long time now, CJ chai. CoA have been terrible. I agree with you on that.
 
You went quickly into Bharat defence mode.

Do you know why the "legal issues" only affect domestic players?

This is not a legal issue.

Simply a matter of COA and BCCI hardening their stance and indulging in powerplay. BCCI mandarins would LOVE if COA were to freeze payments for national players but COA know better.

Withholding payment of national players would paint them in a negative light. On the other hand, denying payments to domestic players means BCCI is put under pressure from state boards.

Recall how BCCI asked the touring England side to bear their own expenditure in India because COA had freezed bank acocunts. The COA copped a lot of negative media coverage and they have wisened up since.
 
This is not a legal issue.

Simply a matter of COA and BCCI hardening their stance and indulging in powerplay. BCCI mandarins would LOVE if COA were to freeze payments for national players but COA know better.

Withholding payment of national players would paint them in a negative light. On the other hand, denying payments to domestic players means BCCI is put under pressure from state boards.

Recall how BCCI asked the touring England side to bear their own expenditure in India because COA had freezed bank acocunts. The COA copped a lot of negative media coverage and they have wisened up since.

Good points... looks like few neutral fans know better than we Indians about BCCI functinoning.

Certain board in mess, running around court / ICC to get India tour is in real mess financially, instead of worrying about that, guys give advice to successfull and wealthiest cricket board on earth :facepalm:
 
So what?

Nobody disputes that the BCCI has huge revenue. The problem is that it’s spending is even bigger, and without ICC welfare handouts it can’t pay its bills.

Can you please provide some evidence of your claims? The BCCI's financial reports will be a good start
 
This power struggle is really bad and Supreme Court should get CoA in line and get them to pay domestic players, it’s ridiculous players are not being paid.. Some of them are from real poor families and without pay it becomes difficult.. I hope media highlights this and puts pressure to get this resolved ASAP.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
They got a note of IOU of 200% you mean .. in the meantime you carry on paying out of your own pocket.

How come "legal issues" don't hamper payment to international players? It totals more than the payment to domestic players.

No one knows what the CoA does and why they do it. They blocked day night tests. Now they have put Shami's contract on hold. They have been holding back payments of domestic players for some reason.

The CoA was originally a 4 member team, 2 members resigned. No replacements. Its a basket case.
 
Why should the CoA even exist? SC should either force upon a new constitution on the bcci and be done with it or leave them. This CoA thing is a joke.
 
Why should the CoA even exist? SC should either force upon a new constitution on the bcci and be done with it or leave them. This CoA thing is a joke.

Power is Addictive :19:

Both parties (COA / BCCI administrators) are trying to hold-on to the same

#AppliesEverywhere
 
No one knows what the CoA does and why they do it. They blocked day night tests. Now they have put Shami's contract on hold. They have been holding back payments of domestic players for some reason.

The CoA was originally a 4 member team, 2 members resigned. No replacements. Its a basket case.

Where are the players unions? This is a joke! They seem to be going under the radar without any scrutiny. They are perfectly capable of releasing money because they do it for international players, but they hold onto the money for those who need it most at the bottom end of the ladder....
 
Is BCCI private or under government?

Wiki says:

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is the national governing body for cricket in India. The board was formed in December 1928 as a society, registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act. It is a consortium of state cricket associations and the state associations select their representatives who in turn elect the BCCI officials.
 
It’s just a fact.

Japanese TV pays FIFA twenty times as much money for TV rights as Argentinian TV.

But nobody claims that Japan is a football superpower but Argentina isn’t.

And FIFA aren’t daft enough to give Japan special treatment or huge welfare payments like the ICC gives the BCCI.

Indians repeatedly confuse the contribution to cricket of their private TV stations buying rights (huge) with the contribution of the BCCI (utterly worthless).

It’s quite funny in its absurdity really.

Could you stop bringing FIFA in every other post, it's a cricket forum for God's sake.

Stop comparing Apples with Oranges...little common sense helps.

Stop showing off your FIFA knowledge, no one cares as we all are cricket fans. Can discuss FIFA in related forums instead of spamming PP :ashwin :shh
 
1. It’s all in the BCCI’s own published financial reports.

Take away the ICC welfare handouts - or indeed restore them to the pre-Big Three model of being the same for every country - and the BCCI would literally be bankrupt.

http://www.bcci.tv/about/2018/bcci-annual-reports

2. Overspending is the whole basis of the BCCI’s economic basketcase status.

It pays inflated wages - a bad thing, not a good one - but more importantly makes unexplained vast payments to state associations.

The BCCI is the equivalent of an ageing and about-to-retire sportsman, used to earning $10 million per year and spending every cent. It doesn’t know how to control its spending and would be insolvent if it stopped receiving the external revenue it gets.

But the ICC welfare handouts aren’t the BCCI’s money. Srinivasan knew that BCCI couldn’t meet its expenses and he effectively held the ICC hostage to try to divert a large part of the ICC’s surplus to the BCCI.

But if and when the post-Big Three ICC says “Time’s Up” to the BCCI, the BCCI won’t be able to meet its expenses.

It’s all in their own published Annual Financial Reports.

OK. Answer me this simple question.

From where lion share of ICC revenue comes?
 
He's put a link in #34 above, no idea if it shows what he's saying tho

Just one simple fact - BCCI will get a huge chunk of the 2.5 billion dollars from IPL TV revenue. What are their IPL expenses? Zero. All of the expenses are paid by the Franchise teams. Just that IPL income alone is enough to pay for all of BCCI's expenses. And we haven't even talked about the income from Sponsors like Nike, OPPO, the TV revenue for Indian national team games etc.

But apparently in JunaidMath, those $$$ don't count.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where are the players unions? This is a joke! They seem to be going under the radar without any scrutiny. They are perfectly capable of releasing money because they do it for international players, but they hold onto the money for those who need it most at the bottom end of the ladder....

CoA is court appointed. So only way to challenge them is to go to the supreme court.
 
Indian private companies!!!
What’s that got to do with the price of fish?

FIFA gets huge revenue from private Mexican TV and private Japanese TV.

But it doesn’t give that money to the Mexican or Japanese Football Associations!
 
What’s that got to do with the price of fish?

FIFA gets huge revenue from private Mexican TV and private Japanese TV.

But it doesn’t give that money to the Mexican or Japanese Football Associations!

FIFA gets money from Japanese TV even if Japan is not playing - How much money does a Pak-SL game get from Indian TV companies?


ICC is not FIFA, where a Qatar or Russia can bribe its way to hosting the world cup. No matter how badly you want it to be. Your opinions "don't count"!

Any response on the BCCI's earnings from the IPL? As pointed out in Post #62?
 
Last edited:
OK. Answer me this simple question.

From where lion share of ICC revenue comes?

What’s that got to do with the price of fish?

FIFA gets huge revenue from private Mexican TV and private Japanese TV.

But it doesn’t give that money to the Mexican or Japanese Football Associations!

You obviously missed Itachi's point. You keep blabbing about ICC handouts to BCCI and Itachi was making the simple point that the bulk for ICC's revenues comes from India.

Not to forget, BCCI's tax payments to India are part of Indian handouts to Australia which enables a bailout of your medical practice.
 
Back
Top