I am not sure why I am heavily criticised when all I am advocating for is fair cricket.
How would you explain a debutant like Kuldeep Yadav running through the strong Aussie batting line up after they got to a thumping 131/1 at lunch. Or England falling apart the way they did in the final day of Chennai test match ?
The pitches have been so sub standard that they don't last beyond 2-3 days leave alone 5 full days of Test Match. It this gives unfair advantage to side bowling last. Pitches like Pune, Bengaluru or Nagpur have been outright substandard but even the others have been prepared considering it gives advantage to certain side.
To restore fairness and to give the Indian team a taste of their medicine when they tour overseas, the host nations must not be shy of preparing green mambas or bouncy tracks. That's all I am calling for.
I am not hateful of Indian team winning but winning fair and square is what has been lacking.
Forget my earlier post, suddenly i have nothing to do so i will attempt to try and make you understand why what happened, happened, though this would be a lot easier if you first read a lot about cricket and understand what it actually is, not to mention actually watching games rather than just looking at scoreboard and then coming to blab about conspiracies here also helps. So here it goes,
Firstly chennai pitch was a road, which is why england made 450+ and india replied with a 700, i hope you have conspiracies about this part atleast. What happened on the last day was not due to wicket but due to a bad tour and the resulting fatigue. You can go have a look at all wickets and you will see that barring 1 or maybe 2 atmost all the wickets that fell were down to bad shots by batsmen nothing to do with the pitch, i cannot explain why they played those shots though i am not a psychologist so please forgive me for that.
Kuldeep yadav got those wickets because of what he is rather than because of the pitch, any batsman hardly ever faces a china man in their whole careers so very few actually know how to handle them. But lets examine his wickets in the first innings just to assuage you doubts shall we
1. Warner - he is a bad player of spin i hope i don't have to explain that one to you, he was surviving dangerously in the first session riding his luck more than once, he tried going back to a fuller length ball and got beaten by bounce in the pitch not the turn, sort bounce which lyon and cummins are more used to than kuldeep yadav.
2. Handscomb - He could not read yadav off his hand like you should when playing a leggie which was the first problem for him, he looked uncomfortable against him from the onset due to that and was out because of the drift not the spin not the pitch but drift, so again can't blame the pitch for this one.
Now onto other stuff, so you reckon 3 pitches out of 17 were unfair
3. Maxwell - Had the same problem as handscomb, did not read the wrong one or the googly whatever you call it and got bowled, nothing to do with pitch or conditions.
4. Cummins - This was beautiful bowling, getting cummins to drive, he mistimed it giving kuldeep a simple catch.
Now onto other stuff, you reckon 3 pitches out of total 17 were unfair, about other pitches you say they still gave india advantage, well mate the game is played in india it is going to spin and not swing this is not england live with it, when india goes to south africa we won't get a spinning track we get a greenish track that's how it is. That is also the reason why i and others call you a troll, no england fan or cricketer had anything bad to say about pitches most called them docile but you the conspiratorial nut that you are call them dustbowls, NZ got a bloody green track for ***, again no fan or cricketer complained but you called them dustbowls too, and now the same tune for australia series.
