What's new

Harry Brook versus Saim Ayub versus Yashasvi Jaiswal versus Rachin Ravindra - Who will rule the next decade of cricket?

Bhaijaan

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Runs
69,118
Post of the Week
1
Brooke is laying the smack down and hitting some daddy knocks very early in his test career. Sounds like a great prospect and already a star. Averaging in 60s now.

Saim Ayub is Mr No Look, the most stylish batter ever since Azharuddin retired. He’s already winning matches for Pakistan and playing knocks that look royalty.

Jaiswal is also in a great form and is scoring some good runs and has a solid FC record behind him.

It’s clear that the future of batting belongs to these 3 kids.

Which one do you think will end up as the greatest of this generation?
 
Saim needs to do well in test cricket to be in the conversation with the other two. He certainly has the talent to be a great player though.

Right now I think its Harry Brook, Yashasvi Jaiswal, and Rachin Ravindra that are the most exciting future batting prospects.
 
No Rachin? I think he's just as gifted as the others. And more watchable than all of them too

Brook stands out because of his ability to score heavily off good length deliveries with damn good strike rotation.

You have to get him on tough spinning pitches or with seam movement before the kookaburra ages more than 30 overs.

After that , he's a nightmare to bowl and set fields for.

You can't drop him thrice like NZ did today. Criminal.
 
No Rachin? I think he's just as gifted as the others. And more watchable than all of them too

Brook stands out because of his ability to score heavily off good length deliveries with damn good strike rotation.

You have to get him on tough spinning pitches or with seam movement before the kookaburra ages more than 30 overs.

After that , he's a nightmare to bowl and set fields for.

You can't drop him thrice like NZ did today. Criminal.
Ya.. I think Rachin is criminal miss from the list.
 
Brooks and Jaiswal are your big deal.

Saim Ayub won’t have a successful international career and few years later Bhaijaan will move on from him.

Ravindra will be a good batter but I don’t see him being as prolific as Williamson in home conditions. He will be world class but most likely become a Conway in long run.
 
Jaiswal is heads and shoulders better than Saim and Brook skill and talent wise
 
@BouncerGuy

Brother, if it is acceptable can you please also add the name of Rachin Ravindra. I think I just forgot about him there and early posters have rightly pointed that out.

Thanks
 
No Rachin? I think he's just as gifted as the others. And more watchable than all of them too

Brook stands out because of his ability to score heavily off good length deliveries with damn good strike rotation.

You have to get him on tough spinning pitches or with seam movement before the kookaburra ages more than 30 overs.

After that , he's a nightmare to bowl and set fields for.

You can't drop him thrice like NZ did today. Criminal.
Bro you rate saim alot do you see him becoming next saeed anwar?
 
Very thought provoking thread as usual by @Bhaijaan.

I did a lot of analysis and looked at stats, correlations, memorable innings and potential paths for greatness etc.

After doing all of this I concluded that I don't really care, I am not interested in their achievements, and no matter what these guys do they won't be able to hold a candle to the epic duels we were used to in 90's and 00's.

Nowadays I am only watching cricket to see if Joe Root can break Tendulkars record. After that my friendship with cricket will end ( on a positive or negative note depending on outcome).
 
Bro you rate saim alot do you see him becoming next saeed anwar?

It all depends on Saim.
He has the spark in him. But does he have it in him to stay focussed and take this game to the next level? If he dedicates all effort towards it, he will become one of the premier batters in the world.
 
Saim is way more talented than anyone else. He already has a 53 ball 100 in Odis.
 
In terms of talent

1) Jaiswal
2) Rachin Ravindra
3) Saim Ayub
4) Harry Brooks (I don't rate him, just a flat track bully)

In terms of achievements atm

1) Rachin Ravindra
2) Brooks
3) Jaiswal
4) Saim ayub

No point in comparing achievements jaiswal is an infant and saim has flunked in t20 and been bamg avg in tests. Only showed promise in the 3 to 4 odi games he's played.
 
Anyone here thinks Tristan Stubbs deserves to be in this conversation?
 
In terms of talent

1) Jaiswal
2) Rachin Ravindra
3) Saim Ayub
4) Harry Brooks (I don't rate him, just a flat track bully)

In terms of achievements atm

1) Rachin Ravindra
2) Brooks
3) Jaiswal
4) Saim ayub

No point in comparing achievements jaiswal is an infant and saim has flunked in t20 and been bamg avg in tests. Only showed promise in the 3 to 4 odi games he's played.
Ya bro we have this so called talent harry brook got exposed big time by sajid and noman he just scores on highway pitches.
 
Ya bro we have this so called talent harry brook got exposed big time by sajid and noman he just scores on highway pitches.
I never liked Brook and thought he was a poor replacement for the fizzled out Jason Roy.

He's a solid and certified flat track bully and on such pitches he'll be an asset to England as he'll be a nightmare to the opposition.

However he's just a bootleg rohit sharma.
 
Bit sad that Shubhman Gill who was supposed to take the baton from Virat Kohli failed to be that guy.
 
I never liked Brook and thought he was a poor replacement for the fizzled out Jason Roy.

He's a solid and certified flat track bully and on such pitches he'll be an asset to England as he'll be a nightmare to the opposition.

However he's just a bootleg rohit sharma.
Ya true he doesn't even seem confident where ball even turns a inch i mean its one thing to struggle this guy just play the most weird shots against spin i seen his batting last 2 tests he just looked like a hack batting against noman and sajid.
 
Jaiswal, Rachin and Brook will have better stats, more match winning performances , impactful knocks and more overall achievements in their international careers.

But Saim Ayub is more talented as he's a Pakistani.
 
Kamindu, Brook, Rachin, Jaiswal are already Test stars. Saim is not. It is almost like we have no one to compare with Saim and end up with comparing with guys who are well aheado of him. May be we can compare with stubbs. But stubbs is a serious T20 batsman. Not so much in other formats.
 
Kamindu, Brook, Rachin, Jaiswal are already Test stars. Saim is not. It is almost like we have no one to compare with Saim and end up with comparing with guys who are well aheado of him. May be we can compare with stubbs. But stubbs is a serious T20 batsman. Not so much in other formats.
Stubbs just scored a lovely 122 in test bhai :ROFLMAO:
 
I think brook practically on the right path and have achieved some great milestones.. hopefully Jaiswal wil catch him up soon!
 
Brook smashes an ATG Test century today in NZ.

Jaiswal gets out on a golden duck
 
1) Jaiswal
2) Brooks
3) Rachin
4) Saim.

^^ This is all formats (Yes ik jaiswal hasn't played odi but talent wise he'll be >)

But in tests Brooks is no 1 atm.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brook and Jaiswal look ready to take on the world, Rachin needs to be more dominant. Kamindu deserved to be here.
 
Saim is the future of PAK batting. I said it from day one when everyone was doubting him, and now he is proving it. Believe in your players instaed of writing them off. When someone has the talent you should be able to judge it, even if they go through struggles or rough patches.

I would say the same for Rachin, Yashasvi and Harry Brook.
 
Age levels :-

Saim Ayub : 22 years
Yashasavi Jaiswal : 22 years
Harry Brook : 25 years
Rachin Ravindra : 25 years
 
Saim is the future of PAK batting. I said it from day one when everyone was doubting him, and now he is proving it. Believe in your players instaed of writing them off. When someone has the talent you should be able to judge it, even if they go through struggles or rough patches.

I would say the same for Rachin, Yashasvi and Harry Brook.

More than anything, this guy oozes class. You wanna see runs but you always wanna see them being made with a lot of style and class. Saim has it.
 
Saim is still not at the top. Number 3 for me.

Brook
Jaiswal
Saim
Rachin
 
No one will come close to Harry brook.
He is far ahead of the rest.
He is gonna break lots of record.
 
No one will come close to Harry brook.
He is far ahead of the rest.
He is gonna break lots of record.

His confidence is at a different level no doubt. Already a triple centurion and the way he’s batted in NZ has been a display absolute dominance.
 
as far as tests go, on current achievement harry brook and jaiswal are head and shoulders above the other youngsters. rachin i feel is the most over rated, he looks good but i just dont buy it. saim will have the toughest time playing in a rubbish set up.
 
as far as tests go, on current achievement harry brook and jaiswal are head and shoulders above the other youngsters. rachin i feel is the most over rated, he looks good but i just dont buy it. saim will have the toughest time playing in a rubbish set up.
Rachin is good on true wickets. He has a few weakness against off spinners. Harry Brook has an advantage of playing awful lot of test matches. So he will get better and better in a short period. That is the same advantage Root enjoyed. Lot of tests
 
Harry brook is terrible issues against spin .Rachin is not yet tested against Aussies or suffers away.saim has started looking good just now but still needs quite a good betterment. Jaiswal needs to be more consistent in sena .I will go with Jaiswal as he is all formmater and much better equipped technically than the rest.
 
Harry brook is terrible issues against spin .Rachin is not yet tested against Aussies or suffers away.saim has started looking good just now but still needs quite a good betterment. Jaiswal needs to be more consistent in sena .I will go with Jaiswal as he is all formmater and much better equipped technically than the rest.
Yea.. Technically pretty good. There are guys like Jacob bethell emerging.


Last 5 years among players who are 24 years old or below across the formats

Screenshot-2024-12-17-1941551.jpg
 
More importantly , Saim has emerged as a superior batter than Babar Azam
 
Test cricket - Brook, Jaiswal, Saim, Rachin
T20 - Jaiswal, Brook, Saim, Rachin
ODI - Saim, Rachin, Brook, Jaiswal
I more or less agree with this.
Tests are ok
T20s: Brook Jaiswal Saim Rachin
ODIs: Saim Jaiswal Rachin Brook
 
I more or less agree with this.
Tests are ok
T20s: Brook Jaiswal Saim Rachin
ODIs: Saim Jaiswal Rachin Brook
Jaiswal is yet to play a ODIs. Gill is world no.3 ranked ODI batsman Harry Brook 56th ranked player. Ravindra 55th ranked player. Ayub is ranked 79 at this point. He has to make some strides to be called as the best ODI player

Rachin did that in world cup. He almost hunted 389 runs against Australia.
 
Jaiswal is yet to play a ODIs. Gill is world no.3 ranked ODI batsman Harry Brook 56th ranked player. Ravindra 55th ranked player. Ayub is ranked 79 at this point. He has to make some strides to be called as the best ODI player

Rachin did that in world cup. He almost hunted 389 runs against Australia.
Yep jaiswal still has no ODIs but I think he will do good there as well. But yeah he should be at number 4 there.
 
1. Saim Ayub
2. Harry Brook
3. Yashasvi Jaiswal
4. Rachin Ravindra
 
Harry Brook is kind of a maverick player. Has multiple gears. Has some weaknesses. Rachin Ravindra looks the most compact. But he has issue against off spin. Bethell is another guy who is coming along. Looked good.
 
Jaiswal going strong

Another SENA test century for him
 
Saim Ayub hasn’t played even one decent test innings. It’s criminal to put him alongside other upcoming talented players. He has too many technical flaws. Also, Pakistani batsmen never live up to the hype.
 
Looks like jasiwal has issues against short bowling, i might be wrong.
He is struggling for sure when aimed at rib cage especially from outside leg stump.good thing is that he is hanging there like Steve Waugh , smith etc but not trying to hit and get out like few players such as ganguly, iyer ,Bevan (test matches) etc.very good or great players survive tough situations or spells to capitalise later.
 
Harry Brook played an outstanding innings today. Absolute box-office stuff

Shut up his detractors big time. Guys like @Devadwal who understand very little about cricket,and think the only country capable of producing talent is India
 
Harry Brook played an outstanding innings today. Absolute box-office stuff

Shut up his detractors big time. Guys like @Devadwal who understand very little about cricket,and think the only country capable of producing talent is India
Yes after 5 chance ( he was out on 0 as well but it was no ball ) . 🤡 :kp
 
Atm objectively its

1) Rachin
2) Brooks
3) Jaiswal
4) Ayub

Talent wise its

1) Brooks
2) Jaiswal = Rachin
3) Ayub
 
Saim is just another tullebaaz , don't belong to this club :kp

Jaiswal> Rachin> Brooks> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saim

:kp
 
Saim is just another tullebaaz , don't belong to this club :kp

Jaiswal> Rachin> Brooks> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saim

:kp

Brooks already proved himself to be clown against spin in sub continent even in limited formats. He was charging against bumrah on yesterday. Other than a hack or slogger, no test middle order batsman will charge a pacer early in his innings. It shows entire world he cant handle quality pace or spicy pitches. He was looking very awkward against bumrah bouncers too.it will be very interesting to see him in ashes down under against starc.Aussies will be noting down every loose aspect.
 
In terms of talent

1) Jaiswal
2) Rachin Ravindra
3) Saim Ayub
4) Harry Brooks (I don't rate him, just a flat track bully)

In terms of achievements atm

1) Rachin Ravindra
2) Brooks
3) Jaiswal
4) Saim ayub

No point in comparing achievements jaiswal is an infant and saim has flunked in t20 and been bamg avg in tests. Only showed promise in the 3 to 4 odi games he's played.
@mominsaigol doesnt rate him, yet another bogus call.
 
Atm objectively its

1) Rachin
2) Brooks
3) Jaiswal
4) Ayub

Talent wise its

1) Brooks
2) Jaiswal = Rachin
3) Ayub
In terms of talent

1) Jaiswal
2) Rachin Ravindra
3) Saim Ayub
4) Harry Brooks (I don't rate him, just a flat track bully)

In terms of achievements atm

1) Rachin Ravindra
2) Brooks
3) Jaiswal
4) Saim ayub

No point in comparing achievements jaiswal is an infant and saim has flunked in t20 and been bamg avg in tests. Only showed promise in the 3 to 4 odi games he's played.
Changed his opinion in 6 months :yk
What a fraud!
 
New indian logic, people can't change their opinion in a 6 month time frame 🫨🫨🫨🫨
 
The top one is for tests not all formats 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
@jeeteshssaxena Lets look at things objectively.

1) Rachin: Despite having a 38 avg, his performance vs India is > all of them. His 100 is a key factor in ending india's unbeaten streak at home.

2) Brooks: Gun batter but yet to be tested in asia(excluding Pakistan)

3) Jaiswal (Fraud)
 
Just like change the team he support from Pakistan to Australia . Not far away from changing another team :kp
Everywhere I go you keep getting clowned on with only a handful of chawal Indians supporting you.

You really want me to chip in and pummel you again? Be careful you're going up against the big dawg, aka Siraj is your fatha
 
Brook was affected badly by hazardous air conditions in India. We can't read too much into that series.
Yeah, 5th strongest economy wise cant produce quality air. Too many smokers 🥴, Rubbish cricket played on a rubbish stadium
 
Brook was affected badly by hazardous air conditions in India. We can't read too much into that series.
He was pathetic against pak too since second test in multan. Do u think it started with multan air pollution. Aqi of 2000 ?.

 
He was pathetic against pak too since second test in multan. Do u think it started with multan air pollution. Aqi of 2000 ?.

Those were complete lottery type pitches, likely the first time in his life he had played on these pitches.

By the way, I didn't make up the issue with smog, it is something he stated himself.

If he has stated it about Multan, you can provide the quote here; otherwise, we can conclude that you are relying on cheap trolling once again.
 
Back
Top