What's new

Henry Kissinger passes away at age 100

Khaleefa

Local Club Captain
Joined
Aug 16, 2012
Runs
2,448
US Daily: Kissinger Predicts No Israel in 10 Years
There won't be any Israel 10 years later, the renowned US politician, Henry Kissinger, predicted.



In a recent article, The New York Post reported that former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger predicted the end of Israel in 10 years.

"Reported to me, Henry Kissinger has stated - and I quote the statement word for word: 'In 10 years, there will be no more Israel," NY Post's columnist Cindy Adams said.

Although some believe that Kissinger has stated his clear vision of future events, given the rising tides of the Arab Spring in the Middle-East and North Africa, others state that such statements are meant to portray the Zionists as some oppressed and growingly endangered people to coax Americans into intensifying their support for the White House's pro-Israeli policies and its ever-growing strategic partnership with Zionist lobbies.


http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9107110280
 
I listened to a recent Henry Kissinger interview and had to log out after 2 minutes, I couldn't understand a word he was saying due to his guttural and robotic voice.
 
Interesting to consider which angle the warmongering old fart was making this latest point of his from.
 
The Zionists are too clever for the inept and incompetent Arabs. How can all these Arab countries be humiliated by a small countyr?
 
I've already said on that forum that the USA has changed its perspective on the MidEast since the "Arab Spring", and Israel will be a forgotten history in two decades max.
 
The USA has always been a melting pot of different nationalities, it doesn't really have any permanent loyalties to anyone. For the recent history policy has been dominated by the powerful Jewish lobby, but as the make up of the nation changes through the influx of new immigrants from other communities there's no guarantee that the Jewish lobby will be able to wield the same influence in the future. If Pakistan could disappear from the map in 20 years, who's to say that Israel won't?
 
I've already said on that forum that the USA has changed its perspective on the MidEast since the "Arab Spring", and Israel will be a forgotten history in two decades max.

I would love to hear your reasons why you feel this to be the case?

Israel is the biggest receiver of US aid and a nation which the US and others have gone to war for it's protection. Kissinger has dedicated most of his life to Israel's cause, you will be hard pushed to find a bigger supporter. He is again using the tired, false narrative of Israel being under threat to promote an attack on Iran or any other nieghbours in the region.
 
As usual Kissinger is wrong...or he is deliberately obfuscating, there may not be a secular/zionist/apartheid entity of Israel that has existed up until now, but there sure will be Extreme Right-wing/Theocratic/fascist/apartheid entity of Israel...

As for Israel in all its form ceasing to exist...all of Europe and North Amercia will be sacrificed before that happens...
 
Last edited:
Before there will be no Israel, there will be no Pakistan.

It is interesting to note, Pakistan was created in 1947 on the basis of religion and next year, Israel was created for the religious grounds. If there would not have creation of Israel, Pakistan might would not come to its existence.

Delusional Pakistanis still think they created Pakistan, but in reality, it was created by the international forces ( including Hindus) to justify Israel's creation.

Indian Hindu played a smart card by giving a separate homeland to Muslims, otherwise eventually, all the Muslims of the subcontinent would get united to fight against Hindus to get their power back . At the moment, we are busy fighting among our self.
 
Before there will be no Israel, there will be no Pakistan.

Why? Because you say so?

It is interesting to note, Pakistan was created in 1947 on the basis of religion and next year, Israel was created for the religious grounds. If there would not have creation of Israel, Pakistan might would not come to its existence.

lol, Pakistan creation had nothing do with Israels.

Delusional Pakistanis still think they created Pakistan, but in reality, it was created by the international forces ( including Hindus) to justify Israel's creation.

Indian Hindu played a smart card by giving a separate homeland to Muslims, otherwise eventually, all the Muslims of the subcontinent would get united to fight against Hindus to get their power back . At the moment, we are busy fighting among our self.

:yk

Indians to this day hate the fact Pakistan was created, they wanted to rule over all the land but had no choice to accept partition.
 
Indians to this day hate the fact Pakistan was created, they wanted to rule over all the land but had no choice to accept partition.

This is typical Mullah and ISI branded propaganda, Indians have no desire to deal with the crazy and fanatic people.
 
Laughing at people who believe the OP. Isreal isn't going anywhere. Kissenger is simply adding fuel to the fire.

Smokescreen, blates!
 
This is typical Mullah and ISI branded propaganda, Indians have no desire to deal with the crazy and fanatic people.

ISI is internationally respected and known as the worlds best intellegence agency in the world... you should be proud
 
Israeli's like to show the world they are the victims of terrorism to gain sympathy and to deceive the world. Backed by the strong media it has actually managed to fool a lot of European and American citizens. This is what Kissinger was attempting to do here.

Kissinger was actually correct, there will be day Israel no longer continues to exists as such an entity, no crusader outpost has lasted, the previous one lasting much longer than Israel's existence to this day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It will probably be called Greater Arab Emirates or something with ArabiyoN ke Abba ji ( Israelis ) controlling everything . :danish
 
Good one!!

map-of-occupation-palestinian-lands-1946-2008-ptt.jpg


:moyo
 
Is there a particular point behind the above picture which you are trying to make?
 
Delusional Pakistanis still think they created Pakistan, but in reality, it was created by the international forces ( including Hindus) to justify Israel's creation.

Indian Hindu played a smart card by giving a separate homeland to Muslims,
otherwise eventually, all the Muslims of the subcontinent would get united to fight against Hindus to get their power back . At the moment, we are busy fighting among our self.

Interesting comment . There have been many topics which mention that most of the Hindu Nationalists ( who wanted the Muslim majority regions out of India ) at the time of partition held the Jews in high regard and were in support for a separate homeland for them in the middle east .

A note related to Veer Savarkars viewpoint on the issue - Savarkar was the man who coined the term "Hindutva "

Savarkar in a statement issued on 19 December 1947, expressed joy at the recognition of the claim of Jewish people to establish an independent Jewish state, and likened the event to the glorious day on which Moses led them out of Egyptian bondage. He considered that justice demanded restoration of entire Palestine to the Jews, their historical holy land and Fatherland. He regretted India's vote at the United Nations Organisation against the creation of the Jewish state terming the vote a policy of appeasement of Muslims.

From Wiki .
 
Interesting comment . There have been many topics which mention that most of the Hindu Nationalists ( who wanted the Muslim majority regions out of India ) at the time of partition held the Jews in high regard and were in support for a separate homeland for them in the middle east .

A note related to Veer Savarkars viewpoint on the issue - Savarkar was the man who coined the term "Hindutva "

Savarkar in a statement issued on 19 December 1947, expressed joy at the recognition of the claim of Jewish people to establish an independent Jewish state, and likened the event to the glorious day on which Moses led them out of Egyptian bondage. He considered that justice demanded restoration of entire Palestine to the Jews, their historical holy land and Fatherland. He regretted India's vote at the United Nations Organisation against the creation of the Jewish state terming the vote a policy of appeasement of Muslims.

From Wiki .


Thanks for the link.

Just like people in US are brainwashed by the Fox TV, majority of the people in subcontinent are brainwashed by their respective intelligence agencies and extremist forces and they tend to believe their propaganda.
 
Artificial countries get created by govt. mandrins using pencils to scribble straight lines on hand-drawn maps. They split up peoples, ethnic and religious groups, tribes, families, including their lands, properties and livelihoods.

They disregard natural boundaries consisting of rivers, mountains, seas, deserts and vegetation.

After many wars, and much suffering, new sets of mandarins redraw new lines on the old maps and re-start the process all over again.

Empires come into being, hang around for a while, and then break up into many pieces, often violently, leaving behind the map-drawn countries mentioned above.

Over decades, centuries and millennia the process is repeated over and over again all around the globe.

The USA, Israel and Pakistan are 3 of the countries around today that have been created by drawing lines on old hand-drawn maps.

Over time, perhaps in a century or two, or even a few decades, they will suffer the same fate as many others have done before, be broken up and redrawn, and cease to exist as they are now no more.

Who says I'm wrong?
 
If Assad's regime is toppled in Syria, could there be a chance the new government decides to take on Israel again to regain their lost territory? I highly doubt its army is in any shape to do so, especially given the civil war going on so it would be suicidal to attempt to take back the Golan Heights within the foreseeable future.

Maybe Egypt could try in the next few years but this too seems unlikely. Israel swatted away Egypt and Syria both in the Yom Kippur War and their martial superiority over these two countries has only increased ever since. Not sure where the threat is going to come from? Iran perhaps but its always seemed to me that their threat has been overblown ala Saddam's "WMD's".

In fact its arguable that Israel is now the strongest it has ever been.
 
If Assad's regime is toppled in Syria, could there be a chance the new government decides to take on Israel again to regain their lost territory? I highly doubt its army is in any shape to do so, especially given the civil war going on so it would be suicidal to attempt to take back the Golan Heights within the foreseeable future.

Maybe Egypt could try in the next few years but this too seems unlikely. Israel swatted away Egypt and Syria both in the Yom Kippur War and their martial superiority over these two countries has only increased ever since. Not sure where the threat is going to come from? Iran perhaps but its always seemed to me that their threat has been overblown ala Saddam's "WMD's".

In fact its arguable that Israel is now the strongest it has ever been.

Assad housed Hamas and Hezbollah...he supports the Iranian regime...the arming of insurgents and attempts to destablise Syria are to weaken Iran's clout...

In Egypt Morsi has been no different in regards to Israel...he has stated that all peace treaties will be respected...

The MB if they come into power will be used to fight against Hezbollah and to oppose Iran not Israel...it could also turn nasty between Hezbollah and Hamas...Muslims frankly prefer to oppose each other rather than Israel...

The Arab spring has nothing to do with Islamic regimes or bringing freedom to Muslims...it has just been about installation of new and more reliable clients...
 
The crusty old man is still alive? Animal predicts no Kissinger in 10 years.
 
I always find from a historical perspective the Nixon-Kissinger duo fascinating.

Nixon was the more interesting personality for me, and has a complex character. You don't get leaders like him anymore.

Historian and political scientist James MacGregor Burns observed of Nixon, "How can one evaluate such an idiosyncratic president, so brilliant and so morally lacking?"

Nixon saw his policies regarding Vietnam, China, and the Soviets as key to his place in history. George McGovern, Nixon's onetime opponent, commented in 1983, "President Nixon probably had a more practical approach to the two superpowers, China and the Soviet Union, than any other president since World War II.

Nixon had a complex personality, both very secretive and awkward, yet strikingly reflective about himself. He was inclined to distance himself from people and was formal in all aspects, wearing a coat and tie even when home alone. Nixon biographer Conrad Black described him as being "driven" though also "uneasy with himself in some ways". According to Black, Nixon "thought that he was doomed to be traduced, double-crossed, unjustly harassed, misunderstood, underappreciated, and subjected to the trials of Job, but that by the application of his mighty will, tenacity, and diligence, he would ultimately prevail".

Biographer Elizabeth Drew summarized Nixon as a "smart, talented man, but most peculiar and haunted of presidents". In his account of the Nixon presidency, author Richard Reeves described Nixon as "a strange man of uncomfortable shyness who functioned best, alone with his thoughts". Nixon's presidency was doomed by his personality, Reeves argues: "He assumed the worst in people and he brought out the worst in them ... He clung to the idea of being 'tough'. He thought that was what had brought him to the edge of greatness. But that was what betrayed him. He could not open himself to other men and he could not open himself to greatness."
 
Assalamu Alaikum!

There will be no Israel, no India, no Pakistan in the future, but when? Allahu Alim! Allaah knows best.

Pakistan will be invaded by India (with the help of others forces) successfully. The Pakistan we know, the system we are familiar with, will die pretty easily. That will happen. From what i have read the messages from late learned people blessed with unseen knowledge - given by Allaah, that it will be biggest turning point for new Pakistan. Let's see what is the future. Allahu Alim! May Allaah forgives me if i am wrong.
 
Last edited:
Assalamu Alaikum!

There will be no Israel, no India, no Pakistan in the future, but when? Allahu Alim! Allaah knows best.

Pakistan will be invaded by India (with the help of others forces) successfully. The Pakistan we know, the system we are familiar with, will die pretty easily, Insha'Allaah!

Before anyone get mad at me.

That will be the biggest turning point for new Pakistan will not only shock the Asia, but entire the world. That's something i struggle to understand after decoding the messages left by learned people who were blessed with unseen knowledge - given by none other than Allaah (SWT). Wait and see, i guess. Allaah knows best.

War always changes the map. Nothing remains the same after the war unfortunately. That's the way it's. If there's anything we have learned in the past, the superpower tends to suffer the most especially when it comes to war.

:))) :))) Fantastic imagination. I just hope you don't end up disappointed when 10/20/40 years down the line nothing of this sort transpires and no magical messiahs appear from thin air to save the day.

Once again :))) :))) at the mythical Ghazwa-e-Hind.
 
:))) :))) Fantastic imagination. I just hope you don't end up disappointed when 10/20/40 years down the line nothing of this sort transpires and no magical messiahs appear from thin air to save the day.

Once again :))) :))) at the mythical Ghazwa-e-Hind.

Well he's entitled to his view based on Islamic eschatology. If you're not a Muslim then obviously you won't accept this view but nothing to laugh at esp since many prophecies have come true.
 
Last edited:
this old fart is a mass murderer and deserves to guillotined, then burn in hell for eternity

this statement was to create more sympathy for the Zionist state on israel among the sheep, nothing more
 
Well he's entitled to his view based on Islamic eschatology. If you're not a Muslim then obviously you won't accept this view but nothing to laugh at esp many prophecies have come true.

Didn't know believing in elaborate and tenuous stories like "Ghazwa e Hind" were integral to the Islamic faith.

He is entitled to his loony opinions but its just laughable to say such far-fetched things in a thread where for the most part discussion has been firmly based on the realities of today and the current geopolitical situation in the Middle East. Not to mention that most of his post consists of India-Pakistan speculation which is tangential at best to the issue of Israel.
 
Didn't know believing in elaborate and tenuous stories like "Ghazwa e Hind" were integral to the Islamic faith.

He is entitled to his loony opinions but its just laughable to say such far-fetched things in a thread where for the most part discussion has been firmly based on the realities of today and the current geopolitical situation in the Middle East. Not to mention that most of his post consists of India-Pakistan speculation which is tangential at best to the issue of Israel.

I respect your opinion even if i don't agree. What happens to agree to disagree in very respectable manner?

Actually, Middle East dilemma and Khorasan goes together. You will be surprised. It's important that we concentrate on Pakistan-India as much as Middle East. Khorasan is very essential for middle east.

Time will tell. Feel free to disagree. Don't need to resort to this kind of tactics.
 
Didn't know believing in elaborate and tenuous stories like "Ghazwa e Hind" were integral to the Islamic faith.

These are prophecies coming from the Prophet(pbuh). It's fine if one has a different interpenetration but to call them stories especially if one claims to be a Muslim shows an enormous amount of ignorance. T

He is entitled to his loony opinions but its just laughable to say such far-fetched things in a thread where for the most part discussion has been firmly based on the realities of today and the current geopolitical situation in the Middle East. Not to mention that most of his post consists of India-Pakistan speculation which is tangential at best to the issue of Israel.

There are various approaches of addressing future geo-political events and how they are interlinked. If someone wants to use Islamic eschatology it's a valid enough opinion for Muslims to hear. In fact most of these make more sense than what you read in the newspapers.
 
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2290671/50-years-on-kissinger-hails-pakistans-role-in-us-china-breakthrough

As China marked the 50th anniversary Dr Henry Kissinger’s secret visit to Beijing from Islamabad, the former US secretary of state on Sunday hailed Pakistan’s pivotal role in bringing the United States and China closer in 1971.

Addressing a webinar titled ‘50 Years of China-US Relations’ organised by the China Development Forum, Dr Kissinger praised Pakistan for its key role during that period and how the then president, General Yahya Khan acted as a go-between China and US, communicating secretly with Chinese premier Zhou Enlai and US president Nixon, which led to Dr Kissinger’s path-breaking journey in a PIA plane from Islamabad to Beijing on July 9, 1971.

The former secretary of state recounted on how the first message from China was in the form of a handwritten note which was personally dictated to him in the White House by the then Pakistan’s Ambassador in Washington, Agha Hilaly.

Speaking next after Dr Kissinger, Senator Mushahid Hussain, representing Pakistan, said that this historic breakthrough in China-US relations became possible due to the “indispensable role of Pakistan which enjoyed the trust of both China and the United States, whose then president, Richard Nixon, had tremendous affection and goodwill for Pakistan”.

Senator Mushahid said that former president Yahya Khan, once entrusted with this task by both Nixon and Zhou Enlai, undertook this sensitive mission with “military precision, secrecy and deception”, with an official announcement of a decoy visit by Dr Kissinger to Nathiagali on the pretext that “the American official was resting due to an upset stomach”, while he had secretly flown to Beijing.

He said that president Yahya relied only on a two-man team of his top diplomats, former foreign secretary Sultan Mohammed Khan and ambassador Agha Hilaly.

The Pakistani diplomat said, “it was an honour for Pakistan to play such an important role in the shaping of history, as Dr Kissinger’s visit to China led to a tectonic shift in the global balance of power in 1971”. He said that normalisation of relations had been beneficial for not just China and the US but also Asia and the world overall.

China had helped the US win the Cold War and the US helped China come out of isolation which led later to China’s reform and opening up policy that has transformed China, he added.

Senator Mushahid maintained 50 years later, one lesson of China-US relations is that cooperation is good for both the countries, and there is no room for outmoded policies like containment or a New Cold War.

The China Development Forum was attended by a large number of high officials, policy makers, economists, opinion and business leaders in Beijing, while Dr Kissinger and Senator Mushahid Hussain spoke virtually from New York and Islamabad respectively.

The webinar took place a day after an unusually rancorous high-level meeting between officials of the two economic rivals in Alaska.

The top Chinese and US diplomats, in their first meeting of Joe Biden’s presidency on Thursday and Friday, publicly rebuked each other’s policies at the start of what Washington called “tough and direct” talks.

Last year, as tensions between Beijing and Washington worsened dramatically, the two countries expelled journalists and the United States shut China’s consulate in Houston, prompting China to shut the US consulate in Chengdu.
 
Former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has died at the age of 100.

He served as America's top diplomat and national security adviser during the Nixon and Ford administrations.

In a statement, Kissinger Associates, a political consulting firm he founded, said the German-born former diplomat died at his home in Connecticut.

During his decades long career, Mr Kissinger played a pivotal, and sometimes polarising, role in US foreign policy.

The statement from Kissinger Associates did not give a cause of death.

Following his death, former US President George W Bush said the US had "lost one of the most dependable and distinctive voices on foreign affairs".

New York City's former mayor, Michael Bloomberg, said Kissinger was "endlessly generous with the wisdom gained over the course of an extraordinary life".

Born in Bavaria in 1923, the school teacher's son first came to the US in 1938 when his family fled Nazi Germany.

He became a US citizen in 1943 and went on to serve three years in the US Army and later in the Counter Intelligence Corps.
After earning bachelor's, master's, and PhD degrees, he taught international relations at Harvard.

In 1969, then-President Richard Nixon appointed him National Security Adviser, a position which gave him enormous influence over US foreign policy.

As secretary of state during the Nixon administration - and later under President Gerald Ford - Mr Kissinger led diplomatic efforts towards China, helped negotiate an end to the 1973 Yom Kippur War between Israel and its neighbours and was instrumental in the Paris Peace Accords that ended the Vietnam War.

Over the years, however, Kissinger was also subject to scathing criticism from those who accused him of putting rivalry with the Soviet Union over human rights and supporting repressive regimes across the world, including Augusto Pinochet's regime in Chile.

Kissinger, however, was dismissive of this criticism.

"That's a reflection of their ignorance," he told CBS in an interview shortly before his 100th birthday.

In 1973, he was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize alongside North Vietnam's Le Duc Tho, who refused to accept.
The controversial award led to two members of the Nobel committee resigning.

While Kissinger left government service in 1977, he continued to be a prolific commentator on public affairs. His counsel was often sought by US presidents and lawmakers.

He also served on the boards of various companies and was a fixture of foreign policy and security forums, as well as penning 21 books.

Kissinger turned 100 years old in May and continued to be active even late in life, including a surprise visit to Beijing to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping in July.

During an interview with ABC on a book tour in July 2022 - when he was 99 - Mr Kissinger was asked whether he would take back any of his decisions in life.

"I've been thinking about these problems all my life. It's my hobby as well as my occupation," he said. "And so the recommendations I made were the best of which I was then capable."

He is survived by his wife of nearly 50 years, as well as by two children - Elizabeth and David - from a previous marriage and five grandchildren.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67574495
 
The number of regime changes and genocides that happened under his watch is amazing.. the man was shockingly evil for a US politician.
 
Not defending Kissinger's record but why does he cop the blame for these crimes and not the commander-in-chief ?

Why isn't there the same level of vitriol directed towards Presidents Nixon and Ford ? How exactly did Kissinger deviate from US Cold War policy before or after ?
 
Not defending Kissinger's record but why does he cop the blame for these crimes and not the commander-in-chief ?

Why isn't there the same level of vitriol directed towards Presidents Nixon and Ford ? How exactly did Kissinger deviate from US Cold War policy before or after ?

The POTUS along with all other high profile politicans are mere puppets. A good read.... The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy[1] is a book by John Mearsheimer,

Also those who think you cannot criticise a dead man are the types who have no understanding of the world.
 
Latin America remembers Kissinger’s ‘profound moral wretchedness’
US statesman’s encouragement of Pinochet’s coup in Chile and his backing for Argentina’s military dictatorship left lasting stain

Henry Kissinger’s death has brought out some bitter epitaphs from Latin America where the legacy of US intervention helped saddle the region with some of the most brutal military regimes of the 20th century.

Nowhere has been the reaction been more damning than in Chile, where Kissinger was instrumental in the 1973 coup that led to the death of a democratically elected socialist president, Salvador Allende and the installation of a dictator, Gen Augusto Pinochet, and his military junta.

Kissinger was a man “whose historical brilliance was never able to conceal his profound moral wretchedness”, wrote Juan Gabriel Valdés, Chile’s ambassador in the US, on X, formerly Twitter.

The coup was seen a major victory by Richard Nixon’s White House, but it marked the start of 17 years of autocracy in Chile.

“Henry Kissinger was an incredibly important figure in the breakdown of Chile’s constitutional order,” said the historian Gabriel Salazar. “He provoked the downfall of [Allende’s] developmental policies, and then the installation of the neoliberal economic model which is still in place today – that’s why we associate Kissinger with Pinochet here in Chile.”

Kissinger’s influence in Latin America spread far beyond Chile. He played a role in Operation Condor, which linked the military regimes in an intelligence-sharing network to hunt down leftwing dissidents.

“Henry Kissinger did not believe in the sanctity of self-determination. He didn’t believe in the sanctity of sovereignty for Latin American nations or the smaller nations of the third world. He believed in superpower might makes right – realpolitik,” said Peter Kornbluh, senior analyst at the National Security Archive (NSA) in Washington DC, which pressured the US government into declassifying Kissinger’s voluminous records. The veteran statesman did not want them made public until five years after his death.

“He didn’t believe in the sanctity of human rights either, which led him to embrace repressive authoritarian regimes as strategic chess pieces in the global chessboard of the cold war,” Kornbluh added.

“Latin America was – for the arrogant policymakers of whom Kissinger was the top dog – our backyard. If we did not have control of what happened in our sphere of influence, Kissinger’s argument went, the rest of the world would not take our exercise of power seriously further away."

...
 
The POTUS along with all other high profile politicans are mere puppets. A good read.... The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy[1] is a book by John Mearsheimer,

Also those who think you cannot criticise a dead man are the types who have no understanding of the world.
What I'm saying is how was Kissinger any different from his predecessors or successors ? He supported military regimes abroad - which American Govt during the Cold War didn't ?

Besides it's not like he was doing these things without the knowledge of his bosses Nixon and Ford. They should also be held accountable.
 
US Daily: Kissinger Predicts No Israel in 10 Years
There won't be any Israel 10 years later, the renowned US politician, Henry Kissinger, predicted.



In a recent article, The New York Post reported that former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger predicted the end of Israel in 10 years.

"Reported to me, Henry Kissinger has stated - and I quote the statement word for word: 'In 10 years, there will be no more Israel," NY Post's columnist Cindy Adams said.

Although some believe that Kissinger has stated his clear vision of future events, given the rising tides of the Arab Spring in the Middle-East and North Africa, others state that such statements are meant to portray the Zionists as some oppressed and growingly endangered people to coax Americans into intensifying their support for the White House's pro-Israeli policies and its ever-growing strategic partnership with Zionist lobbies.


http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9107110280
More than 10 years later Israel is still there..

May have gotten bigger now that most likely there may not be a Palestine after all the ground invasion is done...
 
The death of contentious former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger has drawn nostalgia and compliments in China at a time when relations between the two countries have nosedived.

"You are forever a friend of Chinese people, rest in peace," a top-liked comment on the country's social media platform Weibo reads.

Hours after news of the death broke, the related hashtag became the most searched trend in China, with millions of views.

"This is the end of an era," a top-liked comment says. "He witnessed decades of ups and downs. What would he think about current China-US relations?" another user asked.

Relations between Washington and Beijing have perhaps hit their lowest point since the two sides began talking officially in 1979 - a culmination of efforts kicked off by Mr Kissinger. While ties were "normalised" under President Jimmy Carter, it was his predecessor Richard Nixon who made that first historic trip to Beijing to meet Mao Zedong in 1972, putting an end to decades of hostility.

Mr Kissinger, who shaped US foreign policy during some of the most crucial Cold War years, was instrumental in brokering that trip, which many see as a pivotal moment in China's decision to engage with the West. In 1971, he paid a clandestine visit to Beijing to arrange the meeting.

Largely respectful and solemn, the comments on Chinese social media portray Mr Kissinger as an old and trusted friend from a time when the US and China had eagerly embraced each other.

It was also a time when America was trying to talk to the Soviet Union, and hoped better relations with China would increase the pressure. The Vietnam war was still raging - Mr Kissinger has both been lauded for crafting a peace deal, and also denounced for not ending the war earlier. And he was called a war criminal for his role in the bombing of Laos and Cambodia, which killed tens of thousands of civilians.

Disliked in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, he was nevertheless lionised in China for his role in launching what was the honeymoon period in US-China relations.

Mr Kissinger was one of the most well-known Americans among Chinese people. To this day, his name is taught in history lessons across the country, and so many see him as a friendly Western face - something that they believe has become increasingly rare.

Throughout his decades-long career, Mr Kissinger saw engagement with China as one of his main legacies.

"China is the country with which I have the longest and most in-depth contact. China has become a very important part of my life," he said in a 2011 interview with Chinese state media Can Kao Xiaoxi.

He was one of very few foreign leaders who met five generations of Communist leaders, from Mao to Xi Jinping. In a post on Weibo, state broadcaster CCTV called him a "living fossil" who witnessed the evolution of the countries' bilateral relationship.

His support for engagement between the two countries was so strong that he called the brutal crackdown on the 1989 Tiananmen student protests "inevitable".

"Its brutality was shocking," he wrote in the Washington Post in August 1989, but he also said "No government in the world would have tolerated having the main square of its capital occupied for eight weeks by tens of thousands of demonstrators."

He had written then that "China remains too important for America's national security to risk the relationship."

In recent years too, Mr Kissinger called for easing tensions between the US and China. He pushed for it even as China grew to become the world's second-largest economy and challenged the very American power Mr Kissinger had wielded for much of his life.

And he was always welcome in Beijing - both a reminder of the era of US engagement and a consistent advocate of it.

He visited China more than 100 times, long after he retired - the last visit was this July, where the 99-year-old former diplomat was welcomed by Mr Xi in Beijing despite the chill in relations between China and the US.

Mr Xi said to him China would never forget "our old friends" and China's top diplomat Wang Yi said that the US needed "Kissinger-style diplomatic wisdom" in its China policy.

The meeting took place just weeks after US Secretary of State Antony Blinken's high-stakes visit to China to rekindle contacts, and irked the White House. Mr Kissinger appeared to have better access in Beijing than current US government officials.

"China and the US must inherit and carry forward Dr Kissinger's strategic vision, political courage and diplomatic wisdom," foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said on Thursday after hailing Mr Kissinger as an "old and good friend of the Chinese people".

The Chinese Communist Party has been unabashed in its compliments to Mr Kissinger - a stark contrast to the reactions America usually draws.

"History will remember what the centenarian had contributed to China-US relations," Chinese ambassador to the US Xie Feng said.

State media outlet China News Service described him as someone who had "a sharp vision and could see through the world's affairs".

The view just across the strait - in Taiwan, where fear of Beijing's threats has grown - is less kind.

When the US normalised relations with China in 1979, it switched diplomatic recognition from the self-governed island of Taiwan, agreeing that there was only one China, whose government sat in Beijing.

Source: BBC

 
Henry Kissinger, an important American diplomat, is seen in history in a mixed way. Some people don't like him because of things he did. For example, during the Vietnam War, he secretly bombed Cambodia, causing problems. Also, he supported leaders who didn't treat people well in some places. People say he cared more about politics than doing what's right. So, from a historical view, some see Henry Kissinger in a negative light.
 
China likes Henry Kissinger because he helped make friends with the United States in the 1970s. He played a big role in improving relations, and Chinese leaders appreciate that. It led to better connections between the two countries.
 
China likes Henry Kissinger because he helped make friends with the United States in the 1970s. He played a big role in improving relations, and Chinese leaders appreciate that. It led to better connections between the two countries.
Good point however US gained more than China.
 
Back
Top