Don't worry India might fluke a win or two.![]()
Very remote possibility.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't worry India might fluke a win or two.![]()
Real and realistic have different meanings. Realistic is not an apt choice of vernacular.
If anyone believes Babar has not contributed to winning then they're flat out incorrect.
Actually no.
He batted a a SR of 50 during the early part of his innings.
I think he was like 15 of 30 balls.
A batsman who takes 60-70 deliveries to get going does not need any stopping.
Babar has been pacing his innings poorly for a while now, and his strike rate hovers around 65-70 for his 50 odd runs which is not good enough.
Unless Babar learns to ensure that his strike rate does not drop below 80 at any stage and minimizes his dot ball percentage, he will not be much of a threat to top flight opposition.
At the moment, Fakhar is the only player in the team who can hurt the opposition with the bat.
But you are the one who always used to praise Babar!!!! Why suddenly you think he is rubbish?
He is not rubbish. He is the best batsman Pakistan has produced since Yousaf, but he needs to change his approach and make a bigger impact instead of being the milestone man.
He has the ability to do so, but he needs to show more. If not, his runs would count for little against top flight opposition.
Teams cannot plan keeping only Babar in mind. There will be another batsman as well. For example, if two spinners are brought in, Babar can just take a single and give strike to the other batsman who will smack spinners.
you nailed it bro unlike some attention seekers here calling him nothing player.
He is one of the best player in world. Average & SR often is misleading, as it doesn't factor the context or opponent; but ICC batting ranking does - it does factor how much run is scored, against whom and when. Someone can't be in top 5 in ranking table for almost 2 years now just by piling soft, impact-less runs.
He is one of the best player in world. Average & SR often is misleading, as it doesn't factor the context or opponent; but ICC batting ranking does - it does factor how much run is scored, against whom and when. Someone can't be in top 5 in ranking table for almost 2 years now just by piling soft, impact-less runs.
I rarely disagree with you but here I have to a bit.
He is a good player but NOT quite close to best in the world.
Infact, if people prematurely call him that based on his bashing of West Indies and Sri Lanka mostly (agree there was a soft hundred vs Australia when Pakistan were chasing leather and he batted way too slow to make any change to result) as the best batsmen in the world, then he has do nothing about his game as he is already the best.
But he needs to improve majorly in pacing his innings.
However, he is the least of Pakistan's worries and should be a vital cog in our side for a long time.
He is one of the best player in world. Average & SR often is misleading, as it doesn't factor the context or opponent; but ICC batting ranking does - it does factor how much run is scored, against whom and when. Someone can't be in top 5 in ranking table for almost 2 years now just by piling soft, impact-less runs.
Bizarre thread.
Pakistani fans get together to discuss the thread posed by Babar on behalf of India and no Indian fans care.
Guys, stop pretending that Babar is Pakistani equivalent of Kohli, LMAO!
He averages 38 with SR 82 against top teams: Eng, India, Aus, NZ, SA. His averages is hugely boosted by playing against weak and minnow level teams.
38/82 isn't that bad a stats, considering his age and a horror last series in NZ - take out those 5 innings, I am sure it was in 40+/85+ range. If you do the same for MoHa, Malik or Sarfraz, you might be more surprised. Then, check the same for Kohli, AB, Smith on same criteria vs RSharma, Dhawan, Rahane; Warner, Finch, SMarsh; Amla, Cok, Faf ..... I am sure Babar won't look that bad.
Off topic but do you believe Umar Akmal was just as talented as Babar Azam or even more?
We all know he's finished most likely but would like to know your thoughts on Umar compared to Babar.
India are better off listening to VVS and Zaheer than some of the experts on this thread.
Nobody is saying he's a Kohli, AB or Buttler. He averages >50 in ODIs, 89 in the UAE and when he goes past 50, Pakistan usually win. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that he is a key wicket for the opposition.
Likewise in this Indian batting line there is no one that our bowling lineup would be losing sleep over. Sharma and Dhawan aren't that big of a threat. The rest are gully mohallah level.
Boy, I was so right.i dont think Indian want to stop him.They want him bat as long as possible and slow the run rate.
Likewise in this Indian batting line there is no one that our bowling lineup would be losing sleep over. Sharma and Dhawan aren't that big of a threat. The rest are gully mohallah level.
Likewise in this Indian batting line there is no one that our bowling lineup would be losing sleep over. Sharma and Dhawan aren't that big of a threat. The rest are gully mohallah level.
Good question.
He averages 65.66 in winning chases (13 matches) and 41.76 in all chases (24 matches).
Top winning contributions include:
1) 62* vs ENG (Abu Dhabi)
2) 31* vs SA (Birmingham)
3) 38* vs ENG (Cardiff)
4) 69* vs SL (Sharjah)
A reasonable gripe might be his ability to help chase larger totals.
Good question.
He averages 65.66 in winning chases (13 matches) and 41.76 in all chases (24 matches).
Top winning contributions include:
1) 62* vs ENG (Abu Dhabi)
2) 31* vs SA (Birmingham)
3) 38* vs ENG (Cardiff)
4) 69* vs SL (Sharjah)
A reasonable gripe might be his ability to help chase larger totals.
Likewise in this Indian batting line there is no one that our bowling lineup would be losing sleep over. Sharma and Dhawan aren't that big of a threat. The rest are gully mohallah level.
Likewise in this Indian batting line there is no one that our bowling lineup would be losing sleep over. Sharma and Dhawan aren't that big of a threat. The rest are gully mohallah level.
Likewise in this Indian batting line there is no one that our bowling lineup would be losing sleep over. Sharma and Dhawan aren't that big of a threat. The rest are gully mohallah level.
Likewise in this Indian batting line there is no one that our bowling lineup would be losing sleep over. Sharma and Dhawan aren't that big of a threat. The rest are gully mohallah level.
He's not.Stop Babar Azam from going back home?
Likewise in this Indian batting line there is no one that our bowling lineup would be losing sleep over. Sharma and Dhawan aren't that big of a threat. The rest are gully mohallah level.
#Savage![]()
Good question.
He averages 65.66 in winning chases (13 matches) and 41.76 in all chases (24 matches).
Top winning contributions include:
1) 62* vs ENG (Abu Dhabi)
2) 31* vs SA (Birmingham)
3) 38* vs ENG (Cardiff)
4) 69* vs SL (Sharjah)
A reasonable gripe might be his ability to help chase larger totals.