Hitman
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
- Runs
- 17,961
LOL, Amla, with an average of 47, is as much of an ATG as Stuart Broad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LOL, Amla, with an average of 47, is as much of an ATG as Stuart Broad.
Amla has maintained that test average home and away. And he averages 50 in ODIs and 34 in T20s.
If we are adding Steven Smith, Steyn etc to the list than Amla also deserves to be in there.
Amla’s away average is nearly 47, checked that on howstat. And simply because he is a giant limited overs cricketer (in both ODIs and T20s), that makes him a great. To compare him with Stuart Broad is a joke. Broad will not even make it to Aghanistan ODI/T20 eleven.Averages 44.7 away from home, good but nothing great. Test cricket is the main format where a player's greatness in judged, ODI cricket is an add on that enhances the already established greatness of a player. Amla is a brilliant batsman of his era, but calling him an ATG is as hilarious as calling Stuart Broad the same. Steyn is a bona fide ATG and one of the greatest Test bowlers ever. Steve Smith is not a great yet, in my opinion. But he will probably be one in a few years.
Amla’s away average is nearly 47, checked that on howstat. And simply because he is a giant limited overs cricketer (in both ODIs and T20s), that makes him a great. To compare him with Stuart Broad is a joke. Broad will not even make it to Aghanistan ODI/T20 eleven.
For a fast bowler to have an average of 29 considering he plays like 8 test matches at ideal home conditions every year does not speak high volume.Sorry, forgot to include Amla's neutral venue record while checking out his away record. But how is comparing him with Broad a joke? Broad has 433 Test wickets at an average of 28.92 and an away average of 32.11
Yes, Amla is a much better ODI player. But then again ODI cricket performances merely enhances the greatness of an already great player.
You are only looking at 3 years of away performances. Why?
Yeah Kohli and Steyn are right up there. Also agreed on Dhoni who has done well enough in all formats.Kohli, Steyn, Anderson, Dhoni, Shakib and Smith
For mine, there is a borderline ATG in Kohli, but he needs to maintain this consistency for another 5 years. Sadly, I think there are only two ATGs playing today : Steyn and Anderson.
Dhoni
I only consider great test performers as ATGs, as I don't really care about the other formats.
Dhoni is undoubtedly a limited overs cricket ATG.
Herath didnt do well against India, failed in his biggest test.
Flat wickets argument doesnt count for him. Like Ashwin, he has played on many spin friendly home wickets. Sl wickets are flat for pace bowlers not spinners. Away from home, he averages 36.
An SL great but not ATG.
Ben Stokes has entered the list.
He needs to be a little more consistent.
This is enough to be considered a great in this era but an ATG needs a few more performances like this.
Regardless, he has proved his haters (including myself) wrong after the 2016 WT20 Cup.
I’d say the ECB needs to take a gamble and make him captain. The responsibility will make him more disciplined and he can command respect in a manner that Root simply cannot.
Smith, Kohli and Stokes are the all time greats of this generation.
Starc is an ODI GOAT though.
Rohit and Starc are ATGs in ODIs.Of the players currently playing internationals
Tier 1
Steve Smith
Virat Kohli
Ben Stokes
Kane Williamson
Tier 2
Rohit Sharma
Joe Root
David Warner
Mitch Starc
Rohit and Starc are ATGs in ODIs.
The only ATGs across formats are Smith, Kohli and Stokes.
Kane missed his chance with the WC, he could have become NZ's Imran Khan if he led us to a WC. He's not like Smith or Kohli either who are ruthless run scoring machines either. Sure fire NZ great and second tier ATG in the bracket of Dravid, Laxman, Hayden etc..