Major
T20I Star
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2013
- Runs
- 32,174
- Post of the Week
- 7
I think everyone the issue regarding faf who was charged and found guilty by the icc match referee for shining the ball while he had a mint in his mouth, as its sugary substance which is applied to a ball is assumed to affect how the ball might react when bowling.
Faf to prove his innocence jas appealed the charge.
Now there are two possible outcomes, either through his appeal Faf would be found guilty or not guilty.
Now if Faf's appeal finds him non guilty, it would be interesting to see whether ICC will have to change its rules and regulations regarding applying sugary saliva to the ball. If the sugary substance does have an affect, could this make way for semi ball tempring in to organized cricket?
If his appeal finds him guilty, then it would be interesting to see whether ICC will ban certain items being used by players which could be used unseen to change the conditions of the ball. Obviously, ICC should then apply the rule for all as Faf had said
Faf to prove his innocence jas appealed the charge.
Now there are two possible outcomes, either through his appeal Faf would be found guilty or not guilty.
Now if Faf's appeal finds him non guilty, it would be interesting to see whether ICC will have to change its rules and regulations regarding applying sugary saliva to the ball. If the sugary substance does have an affect, could this make way for semi ball tempring in to organized cricket?
If his appeal finds him guilty, then it would be interesting to see whether ICC will ban certain items being used by players which could be used unseen to change the conditions of the ball. Obviously, ICC should then apply the rule for all as Faf had said